This sensor is still rocks! Honestly, I glad Nikon chose to keep it instead if putting a higher mpx one into it. I did a lot of tests wit various apsc sensors and I think this is still the best. Very good low light performance, excellent dynamic range and great color rendering. Why change it?
I also got Z50 four years ago for video mainly. No problem with weird screen because I don't film myself. And I have external monitor. Can you guess the image sensor looking at youtube videos? No? So why care about old sensors? What exactly you want from new sensor? Planning on getting Z50 II. 60P? Why would anyone use 60P? And for me audio monitoring and 10bit is very good upgrade.
It uses a sensor that was introduced 8 years ago with the D500. One can hope we won't get the same 8-year-old sensor in a newly released camera. Probably is not a deal breaker, but still disappointing (to me, you might disagree). Screen inconveniences I talked about are a non-issue for you obviously as you have different use cases. Same as for the 60p, but people who shoot slow motion video would want to use 60p. If you don't, it's likely useless to you.
@@RawansReviewsfor an entry level camera that 20 mpx is fine. This is not a prosumer+pro body. They just used the tried n tested sensor. To be the Processor makes a difference too. Exspeed 7 and ISP are tuned for Mirrorless means it can give a superior performance than D500 on paper. Even the same performance sounds good to me for anything which is selling for
Question for people who know this stuff better than me-I got the z50ii, it’s my first good camera and it’s been working really well for me, but I was watching videos about the different autofocus settings in the z series and I can’t figure out how to use subject tracking. Is that not a feature on the 50ii or is it automated and not selectable anymore or something?
Interested to know if there exists a so called "PERFECT CAMERA".A master photographer is the one who takes a Perfect Image from an Imperfect camera!!!
This sensor is still rocks! Honestly, I glad Nikon chose to keep it instead if putting a higher mpx one into it. I did a lot of tests wit various apsc sensors and I think this is still the best. Very good low light performance, excellent dynamic range and great color rendering. Why change it?
I also got Z50 four years ago for video mainly. No problem with weird screen because I don't film myself. And I have external monitor.
Can you guess the image sensor looking at youtube videos? No? So why care about old sensors? What exactly you want from new sensor?
Planning on getting Z50 II. 60P? Why would anyone use 60P? And for me audio monitoring and 10bit is very good upgrade.
It uses a sensor that was introduced 8 years ago with the D500. One can hope we won't get the same 8-year-old sensor in a newly released camera. Probably is not a deal breaker, but still disappointing (to me, you might disagree). Screen inconveniences I talked about are a non-issue for you obviously as you have different use cases. Same as for the 60p, but people who shoot slow motion video would want to use 60p. If you don't, it's likely useless to you.
@@RawansReviewsfor an entry level camera that 20 mpx is fine. This is not a prosumer+pro body. They just used the tried n tested sensor. To be the Processor makes a difference too. Exspeed 7 and ISP are tuned for Mirrorless means it can give a superior performance than D500 on paper. Even the same performance sounds good to me for anything which is selling for
Question for people who know this stuff better than me-I got the z50ii, it’s my first good camera and it’s been working really well for me, but I was watching videos about the different autofocus settings in the z series and I can’t figure out how to use subject tracking. Is that not a feature on the 50ii or is it automated and not selectable anymore or something?
not for video but for bird and mammals photography and much much better than the first Z50