I have played multiple times on BGA and this game is growing on me, the art style and mechanics is so reminiscence of classic euros, so many replay value in this game. Definitely backing this game. Hopefully, the final design improve the 3 players experience to free up more ports for ally + advanced cards purchases.
With Edicts, you can choose whether to add or remove for each icon individually, you don't have to do the same for all three. The only exception is when there are two of the same type, in which case you have to do the same for both of them
I believe you start with 1 grain and 1 stone. With edict tiles you can decide each individual symbol to add or remove. Not just all remove or add. Only when there are two of the same symbols you treat them both to remove or add.
At 19:17 I don't think the King can have lower than one. So you would have to raise the stone and grain. Also I'm pretty sure you don't have to either add or subtract all of the edict options, I think you can choose independently for each one.
I think Monique could have tied it? At 58:18 she trades 1 coin for one stone. However, her worker has been promoted to the +1 trade spot, meaning she could have made the trade again. This would give her one stone left over at the end, which becomes 2 coins (minus the extra she would have spent) pushing her 5 coins to 6 to make up the last point. Does this check out? (Just curious to work out the puzzle. Great playthrough!!)
I really like this game! But here are my first attempts at a comment: “I like this game, but I think the name is stu…” “I like this game! I looked up its name and it means “Marvel of the World” or “Wonder of the World.” I can see why they chose the name, but won’t English speakers think the name is stu….” I’m wondering if they’ll come up with a more marketable name. But is the name marketable in of itself? It could draw attention of curious eyes who will find a great game inside the box 😊
You guys are so good at explaining and making an entertaining playthroughs. Greetings from Mexico
Thank you so much!!
I'm glad you guys made a video! After I finish watching, I'll write a tutorial for BGA. :)
@julienmarneffe3716 I'm glad you like them! :D
I have played multiple times on BGA and this game is growing on me, the art style and mechanics is so reminiscence of classic euros, so many replay value in this game. Definitely backing this game. Hopefully, the final design improve the 3 players experience to free up more ports for ally + advanced cards purchases.
Curious to see how things get altered in the final copy!
@@BeforeYouPlaydo you think it was good at 2?
Feels like it's been forever since you guys played a dry euro, love it!
This was my second favorite game I played last year (under Hegemony). Just a fantastic game.
With Edicts, you can choose whether to add or remove for each icon individually, you don't have to do the same for all three. The only exception is when there are two of the same type, in which case you have to do the same for both of them
50:50 when a card disappears from the table caught me so off guard when I first saw it 😅
I believe you start with 1 grain and 1 stone. With edict tiles you can decide each individual symbol to add or remove. Not just all remove or add. Only when there are two of the same symbols you treat them both to remove or add.
Every game that Naveen wins is a victory for all of us.
🫡
Naveeeeen!!!! 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
Every game that Naveen wins is poorly balanced.
When building its 4th tower at the end of the game (59'), Monique forgets to resolve an edict, that could have made her win the game !
the edicts available wouldn't have made her 3rd ally score max points.
Looks good but why is a yellow player’s color also present on cards and allies? Very very confusing
This is an early prototype, hoping those things will get cleaned up in the final production run.
At 19:17 I don't think the King can have lower than one. So you would have to raise the stone and grain.
Also I'm pretty sure you don't have to either add or subtract all of the edict options, I think you can choose independently for each one.
This looks so euro-y good!!
I think Monique could have tied it? At 58:18 she trades 1 coin for one stone. However, her worker has been promoted to the +1 trade spot, meaning she could have made the trade again. This would give her one stone left over at the end, which becomes 2 coins (minus the extra she would have spent) pushing her 5 coins to 6 to make up the last point. Does this check out? (Just curious to work out the puzzle. Great playthrough!!)
Close game! Wow. I'm gong to read through the rulebook on BGA and try my hand at a solo game on there.
Love your gameplay! We also do one of this game!
Did you find this game good at 2?
Cool looking game.
Sold!
Thanks for checking out our video!
Could you please try the Terraria game also?
I believe it will come out soon
Haven’t heard of that one. Is it crowdfunding or retail release?
@@BeforeYouPlay ruclips.net/video/ABKPmDaH01k/видео.htmlsi=u96Wqw3kTuUCLhGI
@BeforeYouPlay I don't know
I tried sending the link, but my comment gets deleted
I really like this game! But here are my first attempts at a comment:
“I like this game, but I think the name is stu…”
“I like this game! I looked up its name and it means “Marvel of the World” or “Wonder of the World.”
I can see why they chose the name, but won’t English speakers think the name is stu….”
I’m wondering if they’ll come up with a more marketable name. But is the name marketable in of itself? It could draw attention of curious eyes who will find a great game inside the box 😊
learning what this phrase meant made me wonder (heh) how "wonder" became "drunken"
@@daem0nfaust good one! 😂
Stupor Mundi was the nickname of Frederic II emperor of the Holy Roman empire
LOL, it was apparently the nickname of Frederick II
Isn't that the far right action to get cards? 53:59
Fixed it literally one second latter. 😂
Haha!!
🙂👍