This interview makes me so glad that I am just a simpleton and stick to the consistent literal, historical, and grammatical method of interpretation. Keeping authorial intent and passage priority always at the forefront.
Hello @Johnturley6091. Dr. Kuruvilla is defending a consistent literal, historical, and grammatical method over and against those who are not. He is all about authorial intent and passage priority. I am thankful for his good work and for him being able to engage at a high level providing and able defense of your view (and mine).
Thank you for the reply. I must have been hearing a different interview. What I heard him convey to the audience left a lot of room for subjective spiritual interpretation of biblical text especially in the specific examples he spoke of. I will listen to the interview again to see where I may have misheard him.
This interview makes me so glad that I am just a simpleton and stick to the consistent literal, historical, and grammatical method of interpretation. Keeping authorial intent and passage priority always at the forefront.
Hello @Johnturley6091. Dr. Kuruvilla is defending a consistent literal, historical, and grammatical method over and against those who are not. He is all about authorial intent and passage priority. I am thankful for his good work and for him being able to engage at a high level providing and able defense of your view (and mine).
Thank you for the reply. I must have been hearing a different interview. What I heard him convey to the audience left a lot of room for subjective spiritual interpretation of biblical text especially in the specific examples he spoke of. I will listen to the interview again to see where I may have misheard him.