New Experiment at CERN to look for “hidden” particles

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
  • 💰Special Offer!💰 Use our link joinnautilus.com/SABINE to get 15% off your membership!
    New articles have been popping up recently about CERN’s new experiment that supposedly looks for “ghost particles.” What are ghost particles? Is CERN haunted? What is this new experiment? Let’s have a look.
    🤓 Check out my new quiz app ➜ quizwithit.com/
    💌 Support me on Donatebox ➜ donorbox.org/swtg
    📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ sciencewtg.substack.com/
    👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ / sabine
    📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle...
    👂 Audio only podcast ➜ open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXl...
    🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
    / @sabinehossenfelder
    🖼️ On instagram ➜ / sciencewtg
    #science #sciencenews #physics
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 651

  • @alieninmybeverage
    @alieninmybeverage Месяц назад +265

    As a potential ghost in 2030, this is an invasion of my privacy.

    • @Jossandoval
      @Jossandoval Месяц назад +22

      You talk as if we still have privacy to be invaded.

    • @alieninmybeverage
      @alieninmybeverage Месяц назад +11

      @@Jossandoval ... occupation of my privacy, then?

    • @christopherellis2663
      @christopherellis2663 Месяц назад +7

      Schrodinger Cat is in two minds about this

    • @Jackiee_Chann
      @Jackiee_Chann Месяц назад +3

      @@Jossandovallol speak for your self, some of us take a lot more precautions than others

    • @borttorbbq2556
      @borttorbbq2556 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@Jossandoval Call we have privacy... barely

  • @PenguinDT
    @PenguinDT Месяц назад +181

    Of course they're using proton beam to catch "ghosts". Life imitates art again.

    • @Mevi
      @Mevi Месяц назад +24

      Don't cross the streams

    • @DJWESG1
      @DJWESG1 Месяц назад +5

      The new one just come out in cinemas

    • @MiltonRoe
      @MiltonRoe Месяц назад +3

      One imagine that the scientists naming this project were well aware of that movie reference. Pretty clever.

    • @daveE5000
      @daveE5000 23 дня назад +1

      Who you gonna call? CERN!

  • @jeffryborror4883
    @jeffryborror4883 Месяц назад +60

    Wavelength the size of a galaxy! Now that wave function collapse would be spooky action at a serious distance. That guy's head would bobble off his body.

    • @tenbear5
      @tenbear5 Месяц назад +1

      hahahaha 😂

    • @aqdrobert
      @aqdrobert Месяц назад +1

      That would need one huge CB antenna, good buddy. Keep your shiny side up, and your dark matter down.

    • @Posesso
      @Posesso Месяц назад

      golden

    • @gubx42
      @gubx42 Месяц назад +1

      These are ghost particles, of course they are spooky.

    • @andrewclimo5709
      @andrewclimo5709 Месяц назад

      Indeed.

  • @timmolzberger537
    @timmolzberger537 Месяц назад +3

    Ahhhh, nice to see some coverage for our lovely detector! I'm from the SHiP collaboration and worked on the electronics for detector - and boy, this will be fun. Thank you for covering our work!

  • @trekguy66
    @trekguy66 Месяц назад +100

    Always check the couch cushions first.

    • @rwarren58
      @rwarren58 Месяц назад +3

      A Heinlein man? Smart.

    • @ITisandiamIT
      @ITisandiamIT Месяц назад +2

      :) Good one!

    • @yakirfrankoveig8094
      @yakirfrankoveig8094 Месяц назад +3

      Then proceed to check everyehre else only thatn can you check the couch again to find it there

  • @FxTR22
    @FxTR22 Месяц назад +21

    Sabine: Can we please stop calling them "ghosts"?
    Scientists: ok, lets call it "Magic"

    • @Bildgesmythe
      @Bildgesmythe 25 дней назад

      Never let scientists name anything.

  • @sjzara
    @sjzara Месяц назад +53

    But aren’t they always looking for hidden particles? If the particles weren’t hidden, we wouldn’t need to look for them.

    • @edwardlulofs444
      @edwardlulofs444 Месяц назад +9

      No, you can’t get money by saying that you want to look for particles. You need something specific that many bureaucrats and scientists think is a good use of money.
      The days of just looking for things ended decades ago.

    • @Lund.J
      @Lund.J Месяц назад +2

      When a "particle" is spread out, like a densification of "aether," covering a wide area, like a waveform in a medium, and this is its ("particle's") coarsest possible state, then how could it be measured ?
      It is present; it is "dark", but unmeasurable (like "aether").
      It is easier to say that: "It does not exist" (AS PARTICLE).
      It is a local quality of space rather than a particle.
      If, for example, we imagine that the "cosmological constant" has a local variation or transformation, how could it be measured ?

    • @D1N02
      @D1N02 Месяц назад +1

      @@Lund.Jor how do you get away with calling it a particle at all :p

    • @bjornfeuerbacher5514
      @bjornfeuerbacher5514 Месяц назад +3

      They aren't only looking for hidden particles. They also are examining the properties of the known particles more closely.

    • @edwardlulofs444
      @edwardlulofs444 Месяц назад

      @@bjornfeuerbacher5514 those are usually funded.

  • @steveellis2829
    @steveellis2829 Месяц назад +32

    I'm just glad they're not looking for hidden Tachyons - That acronym would have to be re-thought!

    • @SiqueScarface
      @SiqueScarface Месяц назад +14

      You are talking about the Baryon Utilizing Large Lasso to Search for Hidden Tachyons?

    • @steveellis2829
      @steveellis2829 Месяц назад +8

      @@SiqueScarface Yes well spotted! Although I would imaging we're also talking Capture Radius Aperture Protocol.

    • @SiqueScarface
      @SiqueScarface Месяц назад

      @@steveellis2829It could be Well Oriented Research into Singular Events.

    • @Al-cynic
      @Al-cynic Месяц назад +1

      @@steveellis2829 The whole time the video was going, I was looking for a synonym of particle that begins with T.

    • @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515
      @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515 Месяц назад

      Fermi Radius Axion Universal Detector
      Baryon Organic Galvonometric Uranium Sensor
      Comprehensive High Energy Accumulator Project
      Big Array of Retroreflective Flashlights
      Interactive Near Field Anisotropic Neutron Transmutation Indicator of Left handed Electrons
      Plenipotent Obtuse Obfuscative Publication Syndicate
      Any sense made is purely accidental.
      Just acronaming. 😅

  • @calvinjonesyoutube
    @calvinjonesyoutube Месяц назад +6

    Sabine, when i heard this story i thought, how can they write a piece that tells me, a scientifically literate person no clue what they are talking about. I eventually found that same experiment website. I then wondered if you would make a nice little video about it improving on the story and enlightening us all. So glad you got to it and glad i wasnt alone in being puzzled by the story.

  • @dr.victorvs
    @dr.victorvs Месяц назад +20

    Sabine, I used to comment on all your videos. As a psychometrician I feel we have quite a bit in common with physics (the whole measuring "invisible" things). Anyway, I can't do that anymore-you're on a roll these days. Thank you.

    • @SabineHossenfelder
      @SabineHossenfelder  Месяц назад +8

      👋 Good to see you here!

    • @Posesso
      @Posesso Месяц назад

      To me, it's quite a human faith restoring thing that felt compelled to comment that. Thanks

    • @someone3195
      @someone3195 Месяц назад

      ​@@SabineHossenfelder Hello Sabine, in your other video, you mentioned that you think most of the research done in your field, was BS. Do u also think this way ab the research at CERN?

  • @aupotter2584
    @aupotter2584 Месяц назад +19

    I think it's indeed the best way to describe dark matter as ghost because nobody ever has a glimpse of it, and maybe I can finally interact with it after becoming a ghost upon my death years later lol... 👻

    • @seriousmaran9414
      @seriousmaran9414 Месяц назад +3

      And it might not even be real, although what is these days? 😊

    • @shawns0762
      @shawns0762 Месяц назад +4

      Dark matter is dilated mass. G.R predicts dilation not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote -
      "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of G.R. predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
      He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A "time dilation" graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated.
      Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no singularity/black hole at the center of our galaxy. It can be inferred mathematically that dilation is occurring there. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass.
      Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. To date, 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 have been confirmed to show no signs of dark matter. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal.
      The concept of singularities is preventing clarity in astronomy. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that they cannot exist. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.

    • @never2yield20
      @never2yield20 Месяц назад

      @@shawns0762 Interesting, I have always thought that as well. "matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily" Singularities are a result of the mathematics used to solve the equations. If a very large black hole got moving fast enough, perhaps space might rip apart. Anyway this video is interesting. Space is "something", and time as we consider it, is also somewhat an artifact. You can't measure it without expending energy. Energy state transitions have to propel everything. Perhaps the mathematical constructs and descriptions are flawed / limited in terms of actually describing reality. Perhaps a ghost math exists and we should hunt for that instead.

    • @shawns0762
      @shawns0762 Месяц назад

      @@never2yield20 Einstein's reasoning on why singularities do not exist is solid as a rock. Television and movies popularized singularities beginning in the 1960's. The recent discovery that very low mass galaxies have predictable star rotation rates is virtual proof that dark matter is dilated mass.

    • @never2yield20
      @never2yield20 Месяц назад

      @@shawns0762 Yep, the "dilated mass" is a concept I haven't heard of before. Guess I will have to do some research. My physics has gotten old. But I have never been fond of the "dark matter" explanation. I also find the large universal structures interesting. Does "dilated mass" explain or being applied to explain ?
      Singularities are a result of flaws in our mathematics. Infinities in a sense could be flaws. Since do they really exist in reality or are just needed to make out mathematical frameworks operate properly.

  • @jackthetford7558
    @jackthetford7558 Месяц назад +5

    Awesome work, Sabine!

  • @DrJ3RK8
    @DrJ3RK8 Месяц назад +3

    Absolutely LOVE the way everything is phrased in this video. :) As always, thank you! It also occurs to me when watching particle physics related videos how well researched (even if far fetched and fictional) much of the writing for Ghostbusters was. ;)

  • @carlbrenninkmeijer8925
    @carlbrenninkmeijer8925 Месяц назад +13

    I think that in 5 years they have a nre project called Search for Hidden Targets.

  • @hedgewitch2801
    @hedgewitch2801 Месяц назад +8

    Wow. Most of us just search for Easter eggs at this time of year.

  • @ucantSQ
    @ucantSQ Месяц назад +2

    I commend the BBC for avoiding the phrase "dark matter." I was just complaining yesterday that "dark matter" is the headline of every mystery of physics. Ghosts makes me stop and scratch my head.

  • @ispamforfood
    @ispamforfood Месяц назад +4

    Interesting stuff! Thanks Sabine!

  • @rywilk
    @rywilk Месяц назад +1

    I'm glad I wasn't the only one confused by those headlines; it took me a while to figure out what "ghost particles" was referring to.

  • @Ryanisthere
    @Ryanisthere Месяц назад +27

    ive already seen several conspiracy theorys about how cern is gonna open the demon portal

    • @jeremywilliams5107
      @jeremywilliams5107 Месяц назад +10

      Damnation. We were being very quiet about the Large Demon Collider. The Small Demon Collider was quite successful.

    • @marianagyorgyfalvi3659
      @marianagyorgyfalvi3659 Месяц назад +2

      Goodbye Fermi paradox!

    • @vilefly
      @vilefly Месяц назад +5

      Still working on the BFG9000.....oh, yeah.

    • @alankott3129
      @alankott3129 Месяц назад

      @@vilefly I now have the music from the original game in my head!

    • @Rob2k22
      @Rob2k22 Месяц назад

      X is packed with cern conspiracy theories

  • @markdowning7959
    @markdowning7959 Месяц назад +55

    You should have saved this episode for Halloween. 👻👻👻

    • @dewiz9596
      @dewiz9596 Месяц назад +4

      It would have been thoroughly debunked by then😉

    • @sampsqwantch4612
      @sampsqwantch4612 Месяц назад

      bless your heart

    • @matttzzz2
      @matttzzz2 Месяц назад

      Title of the video has a question mark (?)
      Thus the answer to the question is always: NO.

  • @bobusa1960
    @bobusa1960 Месяц назад +48

    I can’t believe she said “bullshit” hahaha

    • @daveh7720
      @daveh7720 Месяц назад +14

      You should hear her when she talks about politics.

    • @thstroyur
      @thstroyur Месяц назад +5

      @@daveh7720 Or multispectral glasses.

    • @pauljs75
      @pauljs75 Месяц назад +13

      She's German, no time wasted in getting to the point.

    • @daveh7720
      @daveh7720 Месяц назад +3

      @@pauljs75My kind of people!

    • @seriousmaran9414
      @seriousmaran9414 Месяц назад

      She says it as it is, bullshit is bullshit is bullshit no matter who you are.
      Brexit is bullshit too. So are many politicians.

  • @QuadDog77
    @QuadDog77 Месяц назад

    Sabine, you are awesome. Thanks for your RUclips stuff.

  • @broli123
    @broli123 Месяц назад +15

    They should have called it SHiT: Stubborn Hunt for Imaginative Theories.

  • @MorgDragon
    @MorgDragon Месяц назад +1

    I saw a video talking about "rogue" planets that are wondering around the galaxy (and presumably all galaxies). It was postulated that there are a lot more of these "dark" planets out there then we thought and this could even be the source of dark matter. the idea was that if there were enough planets without stars to orbit around, they would be very dark and hard/impossible to detect, but would add up to a large gravitational force.
    did you ever think of doing a video on this idea?
    thanks Sabine for all the hard work on your videos. i really enjoy them.

    • @nickcarroll8565
      @nickcarroll8565 Месяц назад +1

      Not that it isn’t possible, but there would have to be an absurd number of them to be the entire cause of dark matter.

    • @frankcl1
      @frankcl1 Месяц назад +1

      Stars are just so massive compared to planets, if dark matter is 80% of all mass in galaxies can you imagine how many planets it would represent?

    • @carlsderder
      @carlsderder Месяц назад

      The point with dark matter is that what we observe is that it has a gravitational effect, but it doesn't interact with electromagnetism or weak and strong nuclear.
      If there were just many planets that we can't see, we indeed would see these gravitational effects, but we would also see more effects appart from gravity.
      That is all the point with dark matter and its difference with normal matter, it is not just normal matter that is in a dark place.

  • @Ivan-fs7go
    @Ivan-fs7go Месяц назад +4

    Hidden practicals are also looking for creative scientists. I hope they find each others 😅

  • @nickharrison3748
    @nickharrison3748 Месяц назад

    Good. nicely explained.

  • @FenrirKi
    @FenrirKi Месяц назад +2

    I found the particle responsible for dark matter but I lost it at home. My mother always tells me "you're always losing those damm particles and I must find them later!!"

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 Месяц назад

      Why do you think it's a particle? Astrophysicists call dark matter an "observable effect for which a cause has not yet been found." It's effect is easily seen. What causes it is unknown.

  • @adriang6424
    @adriang6424 Месяц назад +9

    CERN , now specialising in proton exorcisms .... rid yourself of ghost particles now 🤣 {only 100m euro per service!}

    • @JosePineda-cy6om
      @JosePineda-cy6om Месяц назад +3

      seems a proton pack, or simply calling a priest, might be more cost effective

  • @DragoNate
    @DragoNate Месяц назад +3

    "it's not super expensive, only one-hudred-million"
    Sabine's sponsorships be PAYIN'! :P

    • @MicroageHD
      @MicroageHD Месяц назад

      Relax, I work for SHiP and we barely get any money. This experiment has a developement + running time of roughly 30 years. 100.000.000 is not a lot, trust me.

    • @DragoNate
      @DragoNate Месяц назад

      @@MicroageHD I am relaxed lol I'm just making a joke about her saying 100 mil isn't expensive lol
      yes, i know comparatively to other experiments that cost billions, it's cheap, but that comparison wasn't explicitly mentioned which makes it funny.
      relax :D
      i'm not trying to say SHiP is a waste or not worth it or trying to call anyone out. it simply sounds funny to say, out of context, "100 mil isn't much" take note of the 'tongue sticking out face' emoji in my original comment.

  • @nkronert
    @nkronert Месяц назад +6

    Now I'm conCERNed...

  • @ericlipps9459
    @ericlipps9459 Месяц назад +3

    I'd certainly consider 100 million euros expensive, but particle physics operates on a different scale these days.

  • @shidoking627
    @shidoking627 Месяц назад +1

    As a stiens gate fan i cannot allow CERN to mess with dark particles 😂

  • @Whysicist
    @Whysicist Месяц назад +6

    “Poke and Hope”… works as a strategy playing pool and now it’s applied to Physics…good luck. Experimentalists are easy! heehee…

  • @nunomaroco583
    @nunomaroco583 Месяц назад

    Brilliant, nice experiment....

  • @deth3021
    @deth3021 Месяц назад +3

    Dark matter of the gaps.

  • @Yezpahr
    @Yezpahr Месяц назад +10

    Calling them "ghosts" is a literal zeitgeist.

    • @mikemondano3624
      @mikemondano3624 Месяц назад +2

      You literally do not know what the word means.

  • @michaelgilbey6692
    @michaelgilbey6692 Месяц назад +1

    The hardest thing in the universe to find is something that does not exist. as far as i know, a Nothing Detector has yet to be invented.

  • @rweninger
    @rweninger Месяц назад

    I thought a part of the SPS was demolished and the remaining part is a pre-collider to the LHC? Cool if they reactivate it.

  • @benverhaag8191
    @benverhaag8191 Месяц назад

    what is the frequency of a particle that has a wavelength of the universe? and is such a thing really observable?

  • @rickdworsky6457
    @rickdworsky6457 Месяц назад

    Could regions of reinforcement from overlapping gravitational waves explain what we observe as 'dark matter'?

  • @Lucius_Chiaraviglio
    @Lucius_Chiaraviglio Месяц назад

    I was wondering about the possibility that we might have missed something rarely produced or hard to detect in an energy range lower than the maximum of our particle accelerators, and had been thinking to ask it in the comments to some future Fermilab video . . . and here it is, under actual consideration.

  • @fricc33
    @fricc33 Месяц назад

    Lol, I used to work at CERN with the CHORUS collaboration experiment, looking for neutrino oscillations out of the same tungsten target. I bet this is at the same experimental location.
    Ironically the neutrino oscillations couldn't be detected at CERN because we were too close to the source of neutrinos...

  • @skellingtonmeteoryballoon
    @skellingtonmeteoryballoon Месяц назад

    They gonna love them hidden particles, this is exciting

  • @petepanteraman
    @petepanteraman Месяц назад

    All that build up for something so short and sweet, 😆 i don't envy having to make videos like Sabine does 👍👍

  • @anothersquid
    @anothersquid Месяц назад +6

    you get neutrinos from your bananas too! oh no! :)

  • @RaimarLunardi
    @RaimarLunardi Месяц назад +2

    What I don't get is how a massive particle is less interactive than a neutrino? isn't the dark matter neutral and more massive? how is that something similar but way bigger is less interactive?

    • @carlsderder
      @carlsderder Месяц назад +1

      That is what they thought in the past, what i understood is that the theory shifted to defend that hipotetical dark matter particles are actually less massive.
      There is also the opposing theory, modified gravity, that doesn't need new particles.

  • @FrancisFjordCupola
    @FrancisFjordCupola Месяц назад +1

    Ah, next to Bosons and Fermions we will finally have Casperons.

  • @frogandspanner
    @frogandspanner Месяц назад

    2:23 _Tantalium_ - perhaps we should regularise the name to fit in with Aluminium.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations Месяц назад +1

    Thanks, Sabine! 😊
    I've heard ghosts are good people. Or were, I'm not sure.
    Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

  • @AathielVaDaath
    @AathielVaDaath Месяц назад

    Someone behind the project needs to find a way to get the device officially designated the PKE. They are already using positron coliders (though sadly, while probably for the best, this one is licensed)...

  • @thomasgoodwin2648
    @thomasgoodwin2648 Месяц назад

    Try looking for temporal particles. We seem to forget that time bends as well as space.
    🖖😎👍

  • @SeanSpecker
    @SeanSpecker Месяц назад

    the experiments have been done. the papers written. the results ignored for more costly endeavors. good job.

  • @Thomas-gk42
    @Thomas-gk42 Месяц назад +4

    Thank you for your insights. Maybe it has more explanatory power to assume that the particles also go through the superfluid phase transition that you were working on? (name it superghosts)

    • @SabineHossenfelder
      @SabineHossenfelder  Месяц назад +4

      Yes, the masses of particles that can form superfluids are in the same range. I've actually spent quite some time trying to come up with estimates for direct detection experiments, but in the end I couldn't find a way to say anything sensible about it. (So I said nothing...)

    • @Thomas-gk42
      @Thomas-gk42 Месяц назад

      @@SabineHossenfelderThank you

  • @doomVoxel
    @doomVoxel Месяц назад +1

    that was sabine dancing around in a ghost costume 🤣

    • @Thomas-gk42
      @Thomas-gk42 Месяц назад

      That might be, she moves very nice in her music videos

  • @terapode
    @terapode Месяц назад

    Your videos are more interesting, fun and easy to understand than videos from PBS Spacetime.

  • @david_porthouse
    @david_porthouse Месяц назад

    Tungsten is prone to corrosion. Tantalum cladding fixes that.

  • @natthaphonhongcharoen
    @natthaphonhongcharoen Месяц назад

    Shoutout to whoever have to machine those Tungsten to spec

  • @donwolff6463
    @donwolff6463 Месяц назад +1

    We love Sabine ❤❤❤ but, my gal asks: do you have only one shirt? Every time she looks at the screen you have the same shirt on just about. For the sake of my ear, please bring in changes for when you shot sets. :-) ... see i cant even get through this response without her adding: its a nice shirt, but variety is the spice of life, girl! Have fun with it!

    • @Thomas-gk42
      @Thomas-gk42 Месяц назад

      She explained it already som e other commenters: it´s because of the sponsors

  • @carmencardenas9639
    @carmencardenas9639 Месяц назад

    Im not a scientist but I have videos recorder with nvg where light, energy orbs clearly go thru objects. Also they react to laser and will approach to interact if they choose to. I only see them in one area . Tried in other cities and I didn't see any. Are these ghost particles?

  • @dr.merlot1532
    @dr.merlot1532 Месяц назад +1

    I always believed that apparitions are real. Physicists will soon find out.

  • @alicemiller8031
    @alicemiller8031 Месяц назад +2

    There is of course hidden machinery: its an outgrowth of mirror symmetry.

  • @howtoappearincompletely9739
    @howtoappearincompletely9739 Месяц назад

    The fact that there isn't an eye-watering price-tag attached to this experiment makes me a lot less cynical about this than I usually am about particle-physics experiments.

  • @ormrinn
    @ormrinn Месяц назад +1

    What if dark matter is the fabric of the universe, the quantum foam, or the ether, or whatever you want to call it? Fabric bunches and if more is gathered in a spot we would expect to see stars gathering more in these gathered folds, you know like that supercluster.

  • @csabanagy8071
    @csabanagy8071 Месяц назад

    I do not think Dark Matter is a particle what can be found in an accelerator.
    I'm more thinking toward that dark matter is an effect of the moving space-time. In principle frame dragging. More over, I think the "empty" space has mass and momentum too and it is very "elastic" (gravity wave)...

  • @markc4176
    @markc4176 Месяц назад

    One big problem with this approach is that if we are wrong about how “weakly” they interact, and they end up being highly attracted to one another (or to other particles), creating a highly concentrated area of them could be extremely dangerous.
    Imagine if these particles are actually those responsible for singularity-like behavior, and we’re about to create a room full of them.

  • @osmosisjones4912
    @osmosisjones4912 Месяц назад

    The why files is the most honest debunction channal

  • @mtheory85
    @mtheory85 Месяц назад

    I think dark matter is inferred to be dynamically cold, which rules out very low mass particles such as neutrinos (which are accelerated to nearly the speed of light by pretty much anything).

  • @cybervigilante
    @cybervigilante Месяц назад

    To misquote "Field of Dreams," "Build it and the particles will come!" 🤪

  • @anthonyowen6204
    @anthonyowen6204 Месяц назад +8

    To a hammer everything is a nail to a physicist everything is a particle

    • @douglaswilkinson5700
      @douglaswilkinson5700 Месяц назад +2

      For particle physicists. For astrophysicists everything is a star: main sequence stars, neutron stars, white dwarf stars, red giant stars, black stars (now called black holes), star nurseries, star clusters, binary stars, etc.

  • @richardzeitz54
    @richardzeitz54 Месяц назад

    Sabine, you could write an excellent guide to writing science articles! It would be great to read about Karl Popper and falsification, how to write about science without writing oversimplified bulls*t that "isn't even wrong," to borrow one of my favorite critiques of bad arguments. I was fully expecting you to call bullsh*t at first, just on the basis of the headline of the BBC article, so it was interesting to discover what a reasonable experiment it really is and WHY it's a good one, and to realize it was merely the BBC that was full of it. So much bad science writing in the world!You're a gem amongst so much drek.

  • @MrJermeyp
    @MrJermeyp Месяц назад

    I always felt like camera film cases could possibly contain the secrets to dark matter. 🧐

  • @SaltyPirate71
    @SaltyPirate71 Месяц назад +1

    Dark matter, the Easter bunny, string theory, Bigfoot and UFOs...

  • @aurelienyonrac
    @aurelienyonrac Месяц назад

    Hello. Could gravity be caused by how virtual particles recombine? Thank you

  • @dryft7906
    @dryft7906 Месяц назад

    "It's not- It's not shutting down!"

  • @jerry5149
    @jerry5149 Месяц назад

    Sabine, can you please tell me where the evidence is of all the planetary motions that we know are going on, including galactic motions? I am looking for something that has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And, especially, evidence within the domain of particle physics. BTW are there any experiments that model the planetary and Galactic motions, physical models not computer simulations? If not, but some physical models exist how deeply nested are those models?

  • @antongromek4180
    @antongromek4180 Месяц назад

    They should look into old lighthouses👻

  • @atoth62
    @atoth62 Месяц назад

    The Scooby-Doo gang should poke around CERN. See if they can catch a guy in a mask.

  • @nevadahamaker7149
    @nevadahamaker7149 Месяц назад

    1:38 Should've said, "...maybe they should call someone."

    • @Posesso
      @Posesso Месяц назад

      who you're gonna call?!?! (say it!)

  • @peterhall6371
    @peterhall6371 Месяц назад

    Does anyone else think that dark matter is really just local variations in the topology of space? It seems (to me) like such an obvious possibility, and they're really not finding anything anyway.

  • @393miha
    @393miha Месяц назад

    SPS operates at 450 GeV, not at 5 GeV like Sabine said.

  • @bico1592
    @bico1592 Месяц назад +1

    We can forget that brains can have a sense of humor. Thanks Sabine...

  • @chaknorrisvattake
    @chaknorrisvattake Месяц назад

    Hello, Sabine. Great video as always! I am watching your channel because I like your "no bullshit" method)))
    I have offtopic question, i am a simple person without deep knowledge in physics or math, so I wanted to ask real professor about this. Sir Roger Penrose has his CCC theory, I am amazed by it and i think that I understand it's abstract principle. But to me it looks like everybody in scientific world ignoring it. So my question is why? Is it because there is some holes or errors in that theory and everybody do not want to upset Sir Roger? Or there is some other reason? Please explain it to me because it's bothering me for years.

  • @mrx1278
    @mrx1278 Месяц назад +1

    What conversation tidbits would hold your attention on a first date Sabine?

  • @thomasweber7444
    @thomasweber7444 Месяц назад

    Wie lange kann man dieses Publikationstempo durchziehen?

  • @johnarmstrong3861
    @johnarmstrong3861 Месяц назад

    hi i have a thoery that when light is captured with in a blackhole the the blackhole uses this to produce dark energy ( as i call it dark light )and this is the fuel that powers the expansion of the universe without this mechanism the universe would collaspe on it self

  • @John-zz6fz
    @John-zz6fz Месяц назад

    Ok, so CERN is going to use a proton accelerator to try and catch ghosts... 1984 me just got really really excited. Any chance we can get Murray, Aykroyd and Hudson to make an appearance on this?

  • @TheAncientAstronomer
    @TheAncientAstronomer Месяц назад +1

    Well one thing is certain. I ain't afraid of no ghost and neither does CERN!😁

  • @not2busy
    @not2busy Месяц назад +1

    . . . and I suppose that SHiT stands for "Search for HIdden Things"

  • @crazieeez
    @crazieeez Месяц назад

    Dark matter travels faster than the speed of light. You cannot catch it because it travels faster than light can bounce to detect. You will need a gravitational detector to detect dark matter and how fast it is traveling. LIGO plus machine can do it.

  • @nigelapsey9822
    @nigelapsey9822 Месяц назад

    There is another ghost in my view, its E=mc². There is a time component in c², so methinks that time t can mess with mass and energy. Try asking ChatGPT.... So when you run light through dark matter, light speed accelerates...?

  • @Zen_Power
    @Zen_Power Месяц назад

    There’s actually an employee named “particles” who works at CERN. He hides everyday and they look for him.

  • @tajiroller
    @tajiroller Месяц назад

    It seems to me the Dark Matter is the Ether. When atoms come together their Electron Orbital Shells come together and form Electron Valance Shells. When atoms come together and form a matter like earth, then all the Electron Valance Shells come together to form a Massively Multilayered Electron Valance Shell. The MMEVS is a pressure gradient and generates a buoyancy force which we call gravitational field. The MMEVS field is a field which is made up of electric field AND magnetic field shells. Through this field, light passes as radiation waves. Gravity-wise, it is same with the moon and the sun and any other matter which exists in this universe and beyond. The Ether is the fundamental field and matters are created from the Ether, I think as cavitation bubbles. I hope it helps.😅

  • @bugeyedwillypetfarm9625
    @bugeyedwillypetfarm9625 Месяц назад

    My ghost is getting ptsd before im ready

  • @olibertosoto5470
    @olibertosoto5470 Месяц назад +1

    Maybe it's an excuse to fire those big, powerful things more often - that's got to be a lot of fun.

  • @Killer_Kovacs
    @Killer_Kovacs Месяц назад

    Sabine is a Ghostbuster now

  • @GlassDeviant
    @GlassDeviant Месяц назад +3

    How many ghost particles in the average ghost?

    • @Thomas-gk42
      @Thomas-gk42 Месяц назад

      😅one should ask the ghostbusters

  • @egirl2040
    @egirl2040 Месяц назад

    Why isn’t this all over the news like what

  • @wisedonkey_
    @wisedonkey_ Месяц назад +1

    Who you gonna call…? Ghostbusters!

  • @preferredimage
    @preferredimage Месяц назад +1

    Who ya gonna call? CERN!

  • @kurakuson
    @kurakuson Месяц назад

    Sounds as if Star Trek's Transporter could become a scientific reality someday.