Great video. You have no idea how much this has helped me since you’ve told me. Only thing I would say is in your example at 15:20 instead of outside leverage I would play inside leverage for 2 reasons. If for some reason your pressure doesn’t get home a crosser would be wide open if he was able to get across the field because your Lb simply won’t be able to keep up from outside leverage. 2 you have a cloud flat to the outside so any out breaking routes would have to be thrown at the top of the break for that route to be available. Which if they make that throw I would live with but adjust as the game goes on if they are consistent with that kind of throw.
@jamaaljohnson9124 I'm always in fear of a go route om that cause he'd play under it I believe. Unless I'm wrong. Then again too....soft squat will jump the flat route leaving the window open for the corner
@@XandoFootball call cover 9 show 2 get jam on #1, Nickel still has time to get over. What u did before was have the Nickel play a vert hook he jam the point. You can then crash the Flat if 3 goes flat you now read 3-2. 3 goes flat you work to get there. I sent you a message to your gamer tag
Just a heads up, this might not work to the left side. Match coverage is super weird this year in that vs certain formations, match will work on the right side, but not the left. for example cover 6 vs trips works when the trips is to the right. but when its to the left, the matching breaks and you get a busted coverage.
@XandoFootball question have you. Made them other videos for the cover weakness like you did cover 2. I know you said you was going to do it just checking to see if you made them videos already. Appreciate your content that you make
As I continued to watch the video, I realized the idea behind this coverage is the same as what the MUT community calls “Double Mable”, where your essentially getting 3 layers of defense outside the numbers the account for the high low stretch on the flat defender and maddens poor coding of defensive play against bunch
Hey xando. How do you deal with 3x1 trips offenses with a speedy receiver on the single side. I’ve been getting torched by a guy with zay flowers when I was playing quarters
You may want to check out my quarters family video against trips sets. ruclips.net/video/STXcAVEoqc4/видео.html But . . . When you play quarters against 3 x 1, you are essentially stealing the backside safety and inserting him on the frontside. He is taking the vertical of the number 3 on the strong side. The weakness of this is, you are 1 on 1 on the backside with the X and the backside back on your weakside backer. When guys attack weakside of quarters in trips, you want to play a coverage that keeps the safety on that back side. Playing Palms or Cover 6 does this. In cover 6, you are playing cover 2 on that side with a safety topping that weakside player . . . In palms, you can do whatever you want with the backside safety. You could double him on the X....or user him to help on deep routes by the x.
@XandoFootball I use it from bnog. And when u come out in it the line is already in an under front. If u shift the line right, the strong safety come down to the line. Knowing this can make some crazy defensive looks. This also works from quarters and palms coverage as well in BNOG.
I think nowadays madden has seen so many coverage busts due to the original rules of the game and ppl complained, that instead of getting it right, they just have some sort of “anti-coverage bust logic”, which just does a ton of mental gymnastics to make it so unreliable, which is the worst thing you can do. I’m fine if certain concepts cause coverage busts, if the concept to stop it is also on the game…
No. You cannot call cover 3 cloud and run this. Game won't match. You have to call a specific quarters defense and make the adjustments. Against bunch, you can call any quarters defense . . .reg or palms. Cloud flat the outside corner . . . Frontside safety has to be changed to outer third over the bunch. . . backside safety plays inside third . . . User the 3rd defender in and squeeze the bunch taking the 1st route inside. Against 3 x 1 . . . You have to call palms . . . and make all of the same adjustments. You have to have a safety package or a weird sub package called so you can make the safety adjustments. If text is kind of hard to explain . . . just use the time stamps to locate what you need. But you can't call cover 3 cloud and do this. Most important thing in response to your question. MATCH has to be on btw.
@@CalvinKandie so the coverage rolls strong here (safety on the weak side is rolling to the deep middle, while the other rolls deep over top) A wk rotation (safety rolls to deep middle from strong side) buzz coverage (LB in flat safety in hook curl).
It’s really annoying madden still hasn’t fix the issue. It just shows how lazy they are and they don’t play their own game. They’re more worried about MUT instead of fixing their shitty game lol
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I want to say . . . Cover 2 buster . . . a variant of 2 man from what I've read . . . Absolutely SMASHES flood concepts. Wish it was in Madden.
is there a way to add it?
brody you continue to put out the best madden content of all time. props
Great video. You have no idea how much this has helped me since you’ve told me. Only thing I would say is in your example at 15:20 instead of outside leverage I would play inside leverage for 2 reasons. If for some reason your pressure doesn’t get home a crosser would be wide open if he was able to get across the field because your Lb simply won’t be able to keep up from outside leverage. 2 you have a cloud flat to the outside so any out breaking routes would have to be thrown at the top of the break for that route to be available. Which if they make that throw I would live with but adjust as the game goes on if they are consistent with that kind of throw.
Beautiful insight. Were you the one that asked about how to defend flood?
Yes I was. Flood was killing me i’ve been doing a lot better with it. That was literally my only trouble play defensively.
Great video. This will definitely be a tool for my trips to the boundary defense. Another banger!
This guy drops the best stuff
This has been awesome. I have to go back and review for the rest of the defenses
This will hinder flood...not full proof though due to cloud corner not getting good depth sometimes
@@XandoFootballwhy not call quarters Cloud or Soft Squat the CB ,have Nickel take #1 and still squeeze it with 3rec
@jamaaljohnson9124 I'm always in fear of a go route om that cause he'd play under it I believe. Unless I'm wrong.
Then again too....soft squat will jump the flat route leaving the window open for the corner
@@XandoFootball call cover 9 show 2 get jam on #1, Nickel still has time to get over. What u did before was have the Nickel play a vert hook he jam the point. You can then crash the Flat if 3 goes flat you now read 3-2. 3 goes flat you work to get there. I sent you a message to your gamer tag
Another coverage to utilize. Appreciate everything!
great video again
Where is the pentagon defense adjustment video?
Dropping today
Just a heads up, this might not work to the left side. Match coverage is super weird this year in that vs certain formations, match will work on the right side, but not the left. for example cover 6 vs trips works when the trips is to the right. but when its to the left, the matching breaks and you get a busted coverage.
RUclips G.O.A.T 🐐
Will Big Nickel Over G (Cover 9) stock simulate Cloud M? Will you still have to MEG backside CB and Curl-Flat?
@XandoFootball question have you. Made them other videos for the cover weakness like you did cover 2. I know you said you was going to do it just checking to see if you made them videos already. Appreciate your content that you make
As I continued to watch the video, I realized the idea behind this coverage is the same as what the MUT community calls “Double Mable”, where your essentially getting 3 layers of defense outside the numbers the account for the high low stretch on the flat defender and maddens poor coding of defensive play against bunch
Yeah, what’s crazy is that the coverage he just showed is closer to what true “Mable” actually is…
Can you possibly make a series on how you deal with I form and strong formations
Them play action post & crossers be killing me
Hey xando. How do you deal with 3x1 trips offenses with a speedy receiver on the single side. I’ve been getting torched by a guy with zay flowers when I was playing quarters
You may want to check out my quarters family video against trips sets.
ruclips.net/video/STXcAVEoqc4/видео.html
But . . . When you play quarters against 3 x 1, you are essentially stealing the backside safety and inserting him on the frontside.
He is taking the vertical of the number 3 on the strong side. The weakness of this is, you are 1 on 1 on the backside with the X and the backside back on your weakside backer.
When guys attack weakside of quarters in trips, you want to play a coverage that keeps the safety on that back side.
Playing Palms or Cover 6 does this.
In cover 6, you are playing cover 2 on that side with a safety topping that weakside player . . .
In palms, you can do whatever you want with the backside safety. You could double him on the X....or user him to help on deep routes by the x.
Thanks,xo
Very good video xando. That’s all I see when I play mut lol.
Hey can u make video that uses cover 6 invert. Its a very sneaky 2 read defense
Unfortunately I dont have 6 invert in my baltimore defensive playbook..what playbook you use...i can take a look at it.
@XandoFootball I use it from bnog. And when u come out in it the line is already in an under front. If u shift the line right, the strong safety come down to the line. Knowing this can make some crazy defensive looks. This also works from quarters and palms coverage as well in BNOG.
I think nowadays madden has seen so many coverage busts due to the original rules of the game and ppl complained, that instead of getting it right, they just have some sort of “anti-coverage bust logic”, which just does a ton of mental gymnastics to make it so unreliable, which is the worst thing you can do. I’m fine if certain concepts cause coverage busts, if the concept to stop it is also on the game…
Is this any cover 3 cloud, and do you have match on
No. You cannot call cover 3 cloud and run this. Game won't match.
You have to call a specific quarters defense and make the adjustments.
Against bunch, you can call any quarters defense . . .reg or palms.
Cloud flat the outside corner . . .
Frontside safety has to be changed to outer third over the bunch. . .
backside safety plays inside third . . .
User the 3rd defender in and squeeze the bunch taking the 1st route inside.
Against 3 x 1 . . .
You have to call palms . . . and make all of the same adjustments.
You have to have a safety package or a weird sub package called so you can make the safety adjustments.
If text is kind of hard to explain . . . just use the time stamps to locate what you need.
But you can't call cover 3 cloud and do this. Most important thing in response to your question.
MATCH has to be on btw.
Xando do you free-form or nah
Yes
This is really cool, and I think instead of a strong rotation cloud coverage, a wk rotation buzz coverage could be nice to kill Bunch verts…
Could you elaborate, I’m curious bro..
@@CalvinKandie so the coverage rolls strong here (safety on the weak side is rolling to the deep middle, while the other rolls deep over top)
A wk rotation (safety rolls to deep middle from strong side) buzz coverage (LB in flat safety in hook curl).
LOVE IT LOVE IT LOVE IT!!!! BE BLESSED BE LOVE!!! NOTHING BORING GET THAT STINKING THINKING OUT OF YOUR HEAD!!!
It’s really annoying madden still hasn’t fix the issue. It just shows how lazy they are and they don’t play their own game. They’re more worried about MUT instead of fixing their shitty game lol
This is facts. Worst developers ever.
Bro nothing you drop is boring lol
I'm hard on myself. Thanks for the support big dawg.