Why Cessna 182 Skylane Is Even Better Than 172 Skyhawk?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 янв 2025

Комментарии • 17

  • @Storm____
    @Storm____ Год назад +3

    Your channel is super underrated you deserve way more subscribers

    • @bigmetalbirds
      @bigmetalbirds  Год назад

      Thank you so much! Doing my best for the moment. Feel free to share with the people who might like it as well!

  • @luizaquino5935
    @luizaquino5935 7 месяцев назад +1

    Eu voei no garimpo Brasil ( Pará, região de Itaituba) em alguns C182, a carga operacional era 520 kg (mais meus 65 kgs). Pistas de 350 mts ou menos, freios mais robustos, as vezes menos combustível, hora mais apropriada... e foi assim! Grande aeronave.❤

  • @anthonycyr9657
    @anthonycyr9657 10 месяцев назад +1

    Why does it show a 206 on the very first photo? sad..

  • @doctaran
    @doctaran Месяц назад

    There were almost twice as many 172s built and yet there are half as many on the market- and before you try and get smart the crash data shows that accidents and airframe losses are almost twice as high in a 182 vs a 172. That should tell you everything you need to know about which Cessna is best.

    • @Steve-qn8gn
      @Steve-qn8gn 9 дней назад

      Or maybe the fact that 172 is used mostly for training and you’ve got an experienced instructor in the -lane most of the time

  • @blahblahseesaw6715
    @blahblahseesaw6715 11 месяцев назад

    What is the average flight Mission miles for the 182? 400 miles or 500 miles in a day?

  • @charleslewis564
    @charleslewis564 Год назад +1

    I see that you are Cessna fan, can you do one on the Cessna 162 sport light? Good information about all the Cessna planes, thus far

    • @bigmetalbirds
      @bigmetalbirds  Год назад

      I'm a fan of all great planes haha! 162 also is an interesting plane, not the best in class, but ill do a video about it too! Thank you!

    • @charleslewis564
      @charleslewis564 Год назад

      @@bigmetalbirds thank you, I am pursuing my sports pilot license, that is the reason, looking for the pros and cons

  • @petesheppard1709
    @petesheppard1709 4 месяца назад

    The 182 is a fun bird, very solid in the air.
    In aviation, everything is a tradeoff. FUN (and important) FACT: With full fuel, the 182's useful load is LESS than a 172 with full tanks.

  • @AllenPortman
    @AllenPortman 10 месяцев назад

    I would like to have a 177R!

  • @JetBirdZ
    @JetBirdZ 2 месяца назад

    The Turbo model is a beauty !

  • @DC-_-
    @DC-_- 9 месяцев назад +6

    With Bidenomics, your new price is way low. Try 850k for a new one now.
    $550k will get you a decent 2006 ish era plane with 1200 hrs.
    Thanks Biden and his voters

  • @darthheretic129
    @darthheretic129 10 дней назад

    This fool said affordable!

  • @jnick1909
    @jnick1909 9 месяцев назад +3

    Affordable for whom ? 😂😂😂😂