Yeah it's definitely not the sharpest image, but the price point makes them a good value. I would personally save my money and go with better glass though. But if you are on a budget and don’t want to spend more than 200, I would say they are not bad.They are definitely better built then the diamondbacks I own.
Haha I was trying to be nice, but I don’t disagree with you necessarily. I do think their build quality is better than some of the other models in that price range but that glass is not great.
I agree the image on these binoculars is definitely soft.
Yeah it's definitely not the sharpest image, but the price point makes them a good value. I would personally save my money and go with better glass though. But if you are on a budget and don’t want to spend more than 200, I would say they are not bad.They are definitely better built then the diamondbacks I own.
Why is it Sirui Sportich and not just Sirui?
I don’t know really…I think it is odd myself. The first few prototypes were just Sirui, but I’m sure they have there reasons.
Selten so ein scheiß Fernglas gesehen, Randschärfe ist ein Fremdwort und das Bild beim Durchblick ähnelt der Durchsicht durch eine Milchtüte.
Haha I was trying to be nice, but I don’t disagree with you necessarily. I do think their build quality is better than some of the other models in that price range but that glass is not great.