BEST SELLERS! -- 2023 Honda CR-V vs. 2023 Toyota RAV4: Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 июл 2024
  • Today we're doing the HOT COMPARISON of the all-new 2023 Honda CR-V vs. the 2023 Toyota RAV4! Our testers today are fully loaded out; a Limited Hybrid for the Toyota and a Sport Touring Hybrid for the Honda! So which of these gas-sipping family SUVs should you choose for your family?? Go ahead: CLICK to find out :) Also, be sure to LIKE, SUBSCRIBE and tap the notification bell if you enjoyed this review -- it helps us more than you can imagine!
    #hondaCRV #toyotaRAV4 #carconfections
    Also, follow us for shorter-form content on our other social media!
    TikTok: @carconfections
    Instagram: car_confections
    Website: www.carconfections.com
    Merch: carconfections.creator-spring...
    0:00 Intro
    1:00 Pricing Information
    1:54 Detailed Exterior Comparison
    4:19 Interior Design & Technology Comparison
    8:46 Rear Seats & Cargo Comparison
    10:15 Test Drive Comparison
    © Car Confections, LLC 2022. All rights reserved.
    “Sampling the Latest Automotive Delicacies!”
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 616

  • @Kmasse8
    @Kmasse8 Год назад +204

    Cant go wrong with either of these excellent cars. RAV4 has some advantages: 1. Spare tire, 2. Panoramic roof option, 3. Ventilated seats, 4. Rear camera is better, and perhaps most important of all 5. Better fuel economy. CRV has 1. More interior space, 2. More cargo space, and (subjective) 3. Better looks

    • @larrysmoovejohnson4238
      @larrysmoovejohnson4238 Год назад +28

      Imo, that Rav-4 still looks better

    • @edwinbanliongchua824
      @edwinbanliongchua824 Год назад +5

      Honda servicing fee more expensive that Toyota.

    • @arnoldguisa4155
      @arnoldguisa4155 Год назад +2

      I also like the 2 year complimentary maintenance saves you $$$ in this inflation. Thank you Toyota and Honda 👌

    • @joannego856
      @joannego856 Год назад +21

      I’m shocked that the Honda does not have a spare tire. What happens if you get a flat?

    • @buckfutter7774
      @buckfutter7774 Год назад +6

      @@joannego856 they include an emergency inflation device on the left side of the trunk.

  • @peterandrewj
    @peterandrewj Год назад +114

    I like the tech in the RAV4 but the CR-V looks like a good place to spend time: comfy leather seats, rich sound quality, spaciousness, not to mention ride and handling.

  • @williamzhang963
    @williamzhang963 Год назад +17

    It's interesting that you guys are comparing the top trim from each model, while the most popular models are usually the mid-trims.

  • @adampainter103
    @adampainter103 Год назад +9

    Got the 2023 RAV4 base trim and I absolutely love it. Don't need anything fancy, and I appreciate how you actually get to use keyed entry/cranking.

  • @marz6243
    @marz6243 Год назад +81

    Remote start is important to me ( and I don’t want to pay a subscription!). I have ventilated seats in my old cars. Never used them. Seldom use my sun roof. Cargo space and passenger comfort, efficiency and reliability. I have owned a Rav 4 and 2 CRV. Definitely leaning to CRV.

    • @wshaq986
      @wshaq986 Год назад +1

      They both have remote start

    • @jamesb.armstrong5433
      @jamesb.armstrong5433 Год назад +10

      I wouldn't buy something I need a subscription for either.

    • @jamesb.armstrong5433
      @jamesb.armstrong5433 Год назад +11

      @@wshaq986 Yes, but he said you have to buy a subscription for the Rav4 for it to work.

    • @wshaq986
      @wshaq986 Год назад +14

      @@jamesb.armstrong5433 no you don't, it's built into the key fob, just press the lock button 3x and press and hold on the 3rd time, same for lexus. They just don't advertise it. Probably so people can buy the subscription.

    • @jamesb.armstrong5433
      @jamesb.armstrong5433 Год назад

      @@wshaq986 I was just going by what he said in the video.

  • @ledwards3376
    @ledwards3376 Год назад +20

    I really appreciate the side by side views. It’s extremely helpful. Thanks also for doing the decibel testing because interior noise is a key factor for me.

  • @limitedreach4446
    @limitedreach4446 Год назад +89

    CR-V all day. More upscale interior, slightly better looks, better handling, and more room. Though, I’m not sure why it’s lacking so many features.

  • @hellkitty1014
    @hellkitty1014 Год назад +43

    You brothers just get better and better each week!
    The blue with black trim on the CRV definitely helps to remove some of its dullard characteristics. It gives me a touch of Volvo in styling(especially in the rear) and proportions. Its odd, this loaded RAV4 is only $4400 less than a Highlander Limited. Sheesh.
    I think its definitely time for the RAV4 to be refreshed now.

  • @jeffreywong6842
    @jeffreywong6842 Год назад +79

    I was rooting for the CR-V until you mentioned that "ventilated seats" was only available on the Rav4.. instant win for the Rav4 in my book.

    • @davewilson7602
      @davewilson7602 Год назад +7

      It’s already 4 grand cheaper, I feel like they could have added 1-2k for a pano roof and ventilated seats

    • @Fadic4
      @Fadic4 Год назад +14

      Really bad decision from Honda on this. A pano roof, 360 camera and ventilated seats are offered by the majority of the competitors.

    • @joshgutierrez7380
      @joshgutierrez7380 Год назад +2

      They’re keeping it exclusive to Acura which is honestly smart

    • @Fadic4
      @Fadic4 Год назад +16

      @@joshgutierrez7380 but someone shopping for CR-V hybrid wouldn’t be cross shopping with an RDX in my opinion.

    • @jraheemjefcoat429
      @jraheemjefcoat429 Год назад +3

      And panoramic roof for the win for the Rav4!

  • @HaJassar
    @HaJassar Год назад +91

    Honda for me. I just like the design better.

    • @indranimaharaj507
      @indranimaharaj507 Год назад

      Totally agree. There's sadly no 2023 cr vs in Trinidad, just the 2017-2022 unfortunately 😞

    • @Ketoswammy
      @Ketoswammy Год назад +7

      I like the RAV4 design better.

    • @angrut
      @angrut 6 месяцев назад

      Crv always lack asthetic design but this new gen crv looks great and aggressive

  • @minogoda
    @minogoda Год назад +27

    The CR-V looks like the Volvo CX60 which I really like 👍

  • @nickgrnr
    @nickgrnr 9 месяцев назад

    You guys are well versed in each of your reviews. The fact that you guys do your homeowork is very evident and appreciated.

  • @TheKingkingg
    @TheKingkingg Год назад +14

    Both are awesome and offers some difference for different people, I love Honda products because the offer more room and still some fun...and race pedigree includes this weekend as F1 racing world champion engine supplier 2 years in a row

  • @hiyahandsome
    @hiyahandsome Год назад +27

    Toyota RAV4 has more features: fog lights, heated and ventilated seats and better mileage so it gets my vote.

    • @dipeshpatel7623
      @dipeshpatel7623 Год назад

      And get ready to pay for subscription for remote start 😂

    • @kerth6662
      @kerth6662 Год назад +2

      Right for those you are paying a higher price. But I agree Honda should atleast offer those as an add on.

    • @markmason5443
      @markmason5443 Год назад

      Honda dual light system IS A BUILT IN fog light. You’ll see any Honda approaching , they all have 4 lights, anytime they’re on

  • @tobtoo
    @tobtoo Год назад +2

    Great review and comparison, it helped me make my decision to get a Nissan Frontier Truck, Thank you!

  • @draperw86
    @draperw86 Год назад

    Great review!! , it definitely helped me out . I will say if you could please do some post recording editing as I was listening to the review while driving and when you started to say certain words the volume would go up significantly. I would say that you need a pop filter. Either way I it was more noticeable because I was just listening.

  • @asadurrahim1275
    @asadurrahim1275 Год назад +14

    Rav 4

  • @jmrocks49
    @jmrocks49 Год назад +7

    I have a 2020 CR-V EX-L, and I love it. It’s the first car that I’m seriously considering a lease buy-out. I’ve been looking at hybrid vehicles this time (lease ends in July), but the residual value of my CR-V too good to pass up, compared to the new car prices which are ridiculous! When I was in the market for a new car in 2020, I considered the RAV-4, but I just couldn’t get past the cheap interior feel and the over-all cheap looking exterior. The same is true this year.

  • @andrewopinko3887
    @andrewopinko3887 Год назад +16

    19inch rims are not a pro for the crv. Give me some sidewall and better priced tires

  • @tomleung8753
    @tomleung8753 Год назад +1

    We have a heavy snow fall this year.
    And my 2023 crv saying goodbye to all those vehicle that got stuck.
    I was very impressed with the performance I got another today

  • @texasjoe557
    @texasjoe557 Год назад +8

    Went CRV Touring. Buying is very difficult because MSRP is not where it ends. In this market the dealers are adding mandatory accessories (low jack, door guards, wheel locks, etc and so forth) to raise margin even more. Also availability is horrible in general across the industry. No one seems to have cars on the ground ready to sell. You have to wait and only buy what has been allocated to the dealer which alienates consumers and gives you no ability to negotiate price at all. Honda had the easiest process, no market adjustments to the already HIGH msrp.

  • @willie3213
    @willie3213 Год назад +5

    A very helpful comparison. I looked at where each vehicle nudges out the other and gave it a personal weighting in terms of importance to me. As a result a simple bottom line sum isn't my personal sum and my sum will no doubt differ from others who went through a similar exercise. Living in Canada, traction in poor driving conditions is important to me but not part of the comparison. Hard to do in a California testing environment. I have found comparisons elsewhere and will leave it up to people to do their own research if this is important to them.

  • @iSucrose
    @iSucrose Год назад +6

    I really wanted the RAV4, but they were 5-7K above MSRP, so I ended up getting the CRV, which isn't a bad vehicle, but I like all the technology the RAV4 comes with.

  • @bmlove81
    @bmlove81 Год назад +18

    Alright fellas, you've done it again! Another fantastic automotive comparison, between. The Rav-4 hybrid and the all new CR-V hybrid!! It's not an easy choice, regarding which one I think is better. The Rav-4 has more horsepower, but I think the CR-V has more torque. The fully loaded price is less with the CR-V, but the Rav-4 has more options like heated rear seats. Overall, both are great SUV'S!! Thanks again guys!!👍🏾

  • @leecourt8509
    @leecourt8509 Год назад +7

    Love your split-screen edit to compare things instantaneously 🙂

  • @DannyMNable
    @DannyMNable Год назад +34

    Great review. But...So you chose not to give the CRV a point for remote start? How about the mechanical AWD system that only the CRV has... 🤔

    • @colinmakams
      @colinmakams Год назад +3

      Also thought they were a bit biased there!

  • @Ham30
    @Ham30 Год назад +11

    Honda should add rearview mirror camera, otherwise, it looks better than Rav4, but Rav4 is still the best.

  • @veer6241
    @veer6241 Год назад +3

    Nicely done. Love also your RX vs MDX one. Thank you

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  Год назад

      Thanks! Glad you've been enjoying the content 😁

  • @Matthew-rn3ds
    @Matthew-rn3ds Год назад +80

    I think the crv deserves a point for having a mechanical AWD system

    • @hellkitty1014
      @hellkitty1014 Год назад +8

      Yep, I agree.

    • @chrispnw2547
      @chrispnw2547 Год назад +6

      Me too. The Toyota AWD system was noted as only providing off the line traction and not above 40 MPH.

    • @gurpreetdhaliwal4902
      @gurpreetdhaliwal4902 Год назад +8

      They missed this important difference

    • @Phrancis5
      @Phrancis5 Год назад +4

      Came here to mention that too. It's a big differentiator in driving feel over the e-awd and a big reason why the mpgs are slightly less

    • @johnmartin7158
      @johnmartin7158 Год назад +1

      You have a good point. I own a new RAV4. But yes mechanical would be good.

  • @eirosgame8701
    @eirosgame8701 Год назад +4

    I have both but I feel rav4 is little luxurious for long distance traveling.I drove 2 days from Pennsylvania to Northern Carolina and back.I feel comfortable with rav4 than crv.But it’s personal choice
    2022

  • @tinmandw
    @tinmandw Год назад +55

    If the Honda Hybrid had more color choices for the inside and ventilated seats, I'd be all on board

    • @everythinghondapro5548
      @everythinghondapro5548 Год назад +5

      The reviews paid by Toyota

    • @tinmandw
      @tinmandw Год назад +8

      @@everythinghondapro5548 Just because I prefer one of the two, that doesn't mean I'm paid by the other. I do like the CR-V redesign. Just a few small things different, I'd probably buy one tomorrow lol

    • @kirillivanilov1593
      @kirillivanilov1593 Год назад

      You will need to find another way to ventilate your bottom…

    • @saravega-junge4422
      @saravega-junge4422 Год назад +3

      Yes. Once you have ventilated seats it is hard to give them up!

    • @kazpredki5972
      @kazpredki5972 Год назад

      it's true...!!!!

  • @williwyo
    @williwyo Год назад +40

    Great comparison. Both are great vehicles that have always been competitive. We had to decide between the two back in 2009 and went with the RAV. Even though the RAV does offer more features at this point, this time we went with the CRV because one was actually available at our local dealer! We would have to wait for months for a RAV. Personally I like the looks of the new CRV better. RAV looks like some sort of transformer.

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  Год назад +1

      Thanks!

    • @masternobody1896
      @masternobody1896 Год назад

      @@CarConfections looks outdated as f both.

    • @puzer1
      @puzer1 Год назад +1

      "RAV looks like some sort of transformer." lol, both of these vehicles are nearly identical aesthetically...every design cue is the same...

    • @steve8803
      @steve8803 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@puzer1 the cr-v looks significantly nicer(but beauty is in the eye of the beholder). And their interior is significantly nicer. But in my country they are also a few thousand more than the rav. We currently own a 2020 cr-v, but won't be buying another due to pricing. No interest in a rav either.

  • @Jesamazin04
    @Jesamazin04 Год назад +17

    That CRV has the aggressive look that I love . I saw this vehicle in person while getting my Accord serviced . Let me tell you , that thing is so beautiful in glossy black . Very nice looking vehicle. I fell in love with it .

    • @candaceellison7147
      @candaceellison7147 Год назад +1

      Yes that black really caught my eye and i was only driving past the dealership in my 2015 Camry not thinking about a new car. Then boom here i am looking at buying this suv lol

  • @hjinlareal
    @hjinlareal 10 месяцев назад +1

    I live in a hot climate zone, so the cooled seats from the rav 4 come in handy and I love the panoramic sunroof!

  • @johnfrymyer8346
    @johnfrymyer8346 Год назад +4

    I just bought a 2020 Rav4 XLE. My wife bought a 2021 CRV HYbrid XLE a few months ago. Crazy but I get to try both and still love the Rav 4. My fear with a Hybrid is still teh problems of batteries and cost of changing them, my CONventional Rav 4 gets great mileage when compared to most any Gas powered SUV, I get power and still about 26 city and I have not had it on a long drive as I just bought it two weeks ago. I also did not like the Electric push buttong Transmission and am surprised Honda went back to the old Stick SHifting feel. The ability to pull a stick into gear sold me and was a major reason I did not go with a Honda. I also found that both are still hard to find USed and Longo Toyota (worlds largest car dealership) says they will not take anymore new orders as they already are backed up 2 years of orders. THey told me TOyota did not increase their produciton after COVID and is behind. So, I hope to be able to find a 2023 Rav 4 in about 3 years to buy. In any case, buying a Used Rav 4 or CRV, regardless of trim is expensive and usually minimum of $3000 more than the car cost when new. I can't even imagine the problem with buying a new TOyota and have no idea what buying a new CRV is like. One last thought is that the quality is great and they both are rated to run over 250,000 miles. It is hard to beat that, I was a BMW owner until I saw the Japanese by far beat them in Quality for price and length of time their products stay on the road.

  • @ricky3506
    @ricky3506 Год назад +2

    You guys always have the best reviews.

  • @itsatrap4986
    @itsatrap4986 Год назад +35

    The CRV should get 1 point for free remote start.

    • @tsizzle
      @tsizzle Год назад +1

      2022 RAV4, if you have the Audio Plus option, you can still do free remote start. However for 2023 RAV4, they got rid of the Audio Plus option… due to the new head unit. No idea if will support free remote start now. No RUclips channels so far have gone into details to find this answer.

  • @Sunjib12345
    @Sunjib12345 Год назад +8

    Hi Car Confections Can You Make The 2023 Toyota Sienna XSE

  • @immunity4soul
    @immunity4soul Год назад +6

    I have a 2019 accord hybrid and it is pretty awesome. I did have some issues with the electronics during the winter and had to take it in but Honda fixed it with a software update. it did it again and they did something and fixed it. I also have the rav4 limited hybrid 2022 and it is pretty good on gas. better than the accord hybrid. I wanted a crv but couldn't wait so I went with the rav. I am happy with it, drives like a tank and feels like it will last a long time. I wouldn't buy the first year model of the crv, I am pretty sure it will have some bugs to work out. The rav seems pretty sorted out and reliable. Was crazy rushing a pregnant wife to the hospital in the accord in a snow storm and having some weird malfunction where the headlights didn't work or wipers, all abs lights and dash lights on. but the car drove fine, was scary with no wipers or lights but we made it. I think Toyota as far as hybrids go, seem to have better all round reliability and gas mileage. Oddly the rav gets less gas milage in the winter than the accord but only by 2mpg average around 32mpg in the winter and 40 in the summer with the rav. in the accord 34mpg in the winter and 37 in the summer. The Honda feels way more sporty than a camery hybrid tho, it is way more enjoyable to drive. And the regen on the Honda with the paddles is bliss for trail braking into corners, I can roast people in the Honda, it takes turns amazing. IM sure the new crv is probably funner to drive than the rav4. It looks like the new crv has those regen paddles too.

    • @bgy1
      @bgy1 Год назад

      Your RAV4 Hybrid is better on gas than your Accord hybrid? I have a '22 Accord Hybrid Sport and always average 50mpg in mixed drives (in decent weather). I didn't think the Rav4 even cracks 40mpg.

    • @immunity4soul
      @immunity4soul Год назад

      @@bgy1 in the winter the Honda gets better but in the summer the rav gets 40 consistent and the Honda does 37. maybe mine is different. its a 2019 accord hybrid touring with the 17inch wheels. maybe it has 18 inch but not the sport wheels just the hybrid ones. the ride is softer with the smaller rims. I like the accord it drives amazing the rav drives like a bus but it dominates the city. Honda definitely more enjoyable to drive. The rav just has more utility, if they had the new crv available I probably would have Gone for it instead of the rav. few mpg is not a big deal for better driving position and feel.

    • @zl1David
      @zl1David Год назад

      I've really enjoyed my '22 Insight also. In the most demanding conditions for a hybrid - cold, rain, nighttime driving- it still averages just under 50 mpg. Ideal conditions render about 65 mpg.

    • @immunity4soul
      @immunity4soul Год назад

      @@zl1David thats awesome milage!! I dont know much about the specs of the insight but sounds like honda figured it out. Maybe the newer accords do better than mine, i think i got the first year model of new design accord. They might be using better batteries by now and im sure that changes the mpg.

  • @kimbright5208
    @kimbright5208 Год назад +15

    CR-V for me! Can't wait for them to come out. This will be my 4th CR-V. Keeping my '15 since it is paid off.

    • @professorlayabout4878
      @professorlayabout4878 Год назад +2

      Lol, my family has a 2007 and a 2014, I will buy the 2023 and give the 2007 to my daughter soon!

  • @MrNamdang2011
    @MrNamdang2011 Год назад +11

    Honda use CR-V transmission belt drive which is not suitable for towing while Toyota Rav-4 still use the traditional gear drive automatic transmission. People who study mechanical engineering very much can tell that the gear drive system can provide much bigger load than the belt drive system.

    • @technicalitems731
      @technicalitems731 Год назад +1

      Well. The Toyota wins in the transmission department. The Transmssion is the scariest repair cost.

    • @georgiafan6618
      @georgiafan6618 Год назад +1

      Exactly. The RAV4 has 8 spd and no turbo. It’s reliable. I drove it and had no complaints. Amazing that small cars have 8 speeds! We live in a good time.

    • @markmason5443
      @markmason5443 Год назад

      Wrong. Toyota has bands, Honda does not. Re watch the video & listen

    • @georgiafan6618
      @georgiafan6618 Год назад

      @@markmason5443 Toyota has an 8 spd transmission (no bands) in its gas only rav4. Their hybrids have CVTs (bands). Toyota makes one of, if not the best, CVT transmissions.

    • @yt-user7639
      @yt-user7639 Год назад

      Hybrid Honda has no any transmission!

  • @pdg61met
    @pdg61met Год назад +15

    For the cost of the Rav4 you can just buy a lexus or an Acura

    • @xclusivetheslayer490
      @xclusivetheslayer490 3 месяца назад

      Good luck finding a dealer that won’t mark it up by 5k

  • @AbleRiot
    @AbleRiot Год назад +2

    Wanted the updated 2023 RAV4 XSE with advanced tech package but ended up with a 2023 CR-V Sport touring because it was available. Still waiting on two deposits I have for the Rav4🤦🏽‍♂️

  • @gabrielrogers2971
    @gabrielrogers2971 Год назад

    Great job

  • @sennis1361
    @sennis1361 Год назад +1

    Great comparison video
    Wait! The RAV4 in your video had LED Front Turn Signals! WTH?!
    Let me get off the floor !!!
    Omg. Is this all trim levels or just what you tested? Now if we can get the rear turn signals to become LED !!!
    I would be helpful to have ground clearance comparisons
    And turning radius comparisons in all of your videos
    Thank you

  • @TobiHamed
    @TobiHamed Год назад +3

    Lack of a spare tire on the highest trim is really stupid, I've had several flats on my 2021 crv, and the inability to change your tire just ruins your whole day dealing with tow trucks and tire repair shops

  • @johnnguyen2376
    @johnnguyen2376 Год назад +2

    I owned crv, civic, acura, ridgeline, all got no any problem . My neighbour has camry and rav 4 ,complaint about burning oil on both ! I would pick crv again for sure.

  • @adamesd3699
    @adamesd3699 Год назад +30

    It is difficult to convey how much larger the new CRV is compared to the RAV4 in terms of interior space. It’s half way between the RAV4 and a Highlander. The rear seat legroom is huge!
    What annoys me about the CRV is that Honda didn’t include even an option for 360 degree camera and ventilated seats. I understand that this way they could keep the price under $40K for even the top trim, but still.

    • @ibrahimbashir6634
      @ibrahimbashir6634 Год назад +1

      Rav4 has more cargo space with rear seats up !!
      Legroom is more or less same too !

    • @adamesd3699
      @adamesd3699 Год назад +4

      @@ibrahimbashir6634 If you are referring to the current RAV4, then the CRV definitely has more rear legroom. Cargo space is similar.

    • @bryanmarcia4104
      @bryanmarcia4104 Год назад +3

      360 view isn't even necessary of your a competent driver😂😂

    • @ching5235
      @ching5235 11 месяцев назад +2

      If CR-V has 360 camera, it would have been my choice among the many cars we are looking at. Living in the city we have to maneuver through tight spaces and fast so not to block traffic. 360 camera has been the life saver. Love everything else about the new 2024 CR-V.

    • @michaelmi7903
      @michaelmi7903 7 месяцев назад

      360 view is helps with parking, not driving @@bryanmarcia4104

  • @joshgutierrez7380
    @joshgutierrez7380 Год назад +2

    Fog lamps are being discontinued in Hondas lineup as well as Toyotas slowly because of how powerful led headlights are. Fog lights don’t do a whole lot anymore

  • @bench175
    @bench175 Год назад

    Thanks for the details. I was done at 4:53 with the seat vents

  • @Dulitzlives
    @Dulitzlives Год назад

    Excellent review

  • @kennglee
    @kennglee Год назад +6

    They both seem to have noisy interiors, road noise. That’s my biggest complaint with my current Honda.

  • @ryanfrisby7389
    @ryanfrisby7389 Год назад

    Excellent comparison!😸

  • @soryounnarro9913
    @soryounnarro9913 Год назад +11

    I definitely go with RAV4,....it will stay long lasting if compare to Honda CR-V

    • @john2951
      @john2951 4 месяца назад

      I have a 2012 CRV that has no issues. Out Accord is 24 years old with no issues. I'm don't think that is a true statement.

  • @andrewlnguyen
    @andrewlnguyen Год назад +42

    I've been deciding between these two for my next vehicle. It's really tough but at the end of the day the Rav4 has the most features for the price which makes it a better value for me. If CRV had those features available I would pick CRV with no hesitation.

    • @longle6167
      @longle6167 Год назад +11

      Rav4 is a 6 year old model this is its last year. Crv is a new totally redesigned model.

    • @curiosityredpill7030
      @curiosityredpill7030 Год назад +3

      @@longle6167 that’s means Honda should be disappointed in itself for costing more with less features vs a 6yr old design

    • @nicklk132
      @nicklk132 Год назад

      What features does the rav have over the CR-V?

  • @markhu7454
    @markhu7454 Год назад +1

    cabin noise? power output smooth?

  • @joecox9958
    @joecox9958 Год назад

    thanks! what are they battery difference? true leather would have higher grade. CTV difference/ reliability? Both have small screens. Honda AT never fail? 4K more is not acceptable and I doubt a larger engine can save more oil.

  • @MrMlyarber
    @MrMlyarber Год назад +13

    4K difference is huge, I wish the CRV had vent seats but I want to drive it for sure to make up my mind. Great review!

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  Год назад

      Thanks!

    • @williamfreeman6935
      @williamfreeman6935 Год назад +1

      Fuel mileage would offset the price difference over time.

    • @blackwhirlwind1245
      @blackwhirlwind1245 Год назад

      I would definitely go with CRV if only CRV has ventilated seats, HUD and 360 Camera, all 4 door smart entry even if I have to pay 4K extra.

  • @chrispnw2547
    @chrispnw2547 Год назад +12

    The Comparison Kings strike again. Much respect.

  • @AUMA86
    @AUMA86 Год назад +12

    Spare tires usually are only good for up to 50 miles and so is the flat fix machine, so is really a draw there. Beside the cooling seats on the Rav 4, Honda takes it. Plus the Crv's AWD system is actually a AWD with 50-50 split unlike the Rav 4.

    • @cdraynes5129
      @cdraynes5129 Год назад

      The Rav 4 space takes a full size spare

  • @Uncommonsensetoo
    @Uncommonsensetoo Год назад +18

    How they handle on rougher road and off-road situations is really what I am interested in and the only reason I am considering an SUV as I am into going off the beaten path for outdoor adventures. None of that was discussed unfortunately. The missing spare tire on the Honda CR-V would definitely be a disqualifier though. I have had too many flat tires in remote locations with no cell-signals.

    • @gcb345
      @gcb345 Год назад +5

      Neither vehicle is what you'd call an off-roader. Better off with a Jeep, Bronco, or 4Runner.

    • @Uncommonsensetoo
      @Uncommonsensetoo Год назад

      @@gcb345 99% of the time I will be driving on standard roads so gas mileage is important too. So is reliability. That pretty much excludes those 3.

    • @iskdude9922
      @iskdude9922 Год назад

      @@Uncommonsensetoo rav4 adventure model? The hybrid needs to have an a-trac like mechanism and it would be perfect. You could look at subaru also. Theres aftermarket rear lockers for those.

    • @spooner1
      @spooner1 Год назад

      If thats a concern you can purchase a spare at a tire center. Much cheaper than dealer.

    • @whodeenidog4
      @whodeenidog4 11 месяцев назад

      I can not believe Honda didn't come up with 1. Actual spare tire 2. Panoramic Moon roof! How 'stodgy'!! If it weren't for those two items, I would flat out buy the Honda! But I am now going with a different model all together!

  • @westleymoeun1336
    @westleymoeun1336 Год назад

    Looking at one of these for my dad. Wished the crv didn’t have black as their only wheel color on the hybrids because it is nice

  • @kash9893
    @kash9893 Год назад +17

    I hope you guys can review the 23 RAV4 hybrid xse or limited with the bigger screens now😊

    • @sarunassurvila7857
      @sarunassurvila7857 Год назад

      The one in the video has already larger display than those until 2022. Do the higher spec one have even bigger screens?

    • @kash9893
      @kash9893 Год назад

      No, for 2022 i think the one they showed is the biggest offered but the 2023 offers a bigger one

    • @georgiafan6618
      @georgiafan6618 Год назад

      It’s a 10.5” screen. I have a 10” screen in my truck aftermarket. It’s plenty big and I can read the screen without my glasses. The old standard 7” RAV4 screen wasn’t up to date but it connected to my iPhone 13pro every time I got into the veh. So the software on new unit should be just as good. The old radio had great sound too. I was shocked. It’s gonna be excellent.

  • @wshaq986
    @wshaq986 Год назад +4

    I've noticed that Toyota aswell as Lexus have auto start by pressing the lock button three times but choose not advertise it guessing that they want people to use their app

  • @hamidmghazi
    @hamidmghazi Год назад +9

    Honda drop the ball with this one

  • @ZKTheGreat
    @ZKTheGreat Год назад +7

    Toyota wants a subscription for autostart on a $44,500 cars.... wth thats absurd.

    • @Jesamazin04
      @Jesamazin04 Год назад

      Exactly. That’s crazy. My Honda Accord came with auto start.

  • @dpmac1341
    @dpmac1341 Год назад +7

    Two great vehicles. Choose the one that suits you. (If a spare tire can’t be added, I wouldn’t buy a CR-V.)

  • @JoseCalderon04
    @JoseCalderon04 Год назад +7

    The RAV4 is not $4k better than the CR-V... with that said, both are great vehicles.

  • @oldriflela7286
    @oldriflela7286 Год назад +1

    I hope you to compare to their chassis, thanks.

  • @AntonioDiaz
    @AntonioDiaz Год назад +3

    Definitely into the crv more but both great options!

  • @davidhanson3345
    @davidhanson3345 Год назад +11

    These AWD systems are different. If you live in snow country, make sure you try them out in snow before buying. My last RAV-4 was not good, even with small amounts of snow. I felt my 2018 RAV-4 did not do well in snow. Paying $40,000 for a vehicle that does not fit your needs could be an expensive mistake.

    • @georgiafan6618
      @georgiafan6618 Год назад +1

      My older Audi A4 w/Quattro didn’t do well in snow. I swapped in snow tires (for Audis) and it made big difference. Just gotta swap em off when weather changes. I’d do same if I had the AWD hybrid RAV4

    • @Onlyinbean
      @Onlyinbean 9 месяцев назад

      AWD doesn’t magically make you drive in snow perfectly… you still need good tires for the snow

  • @marcellef8302
    @marcellef8302 Год назад

    Excellent comparison review 👍

  • @kurdapyarose8461
    @kurdapyarose8461 Год назад

    Thank you soooooo much for the info. It helps me decide which one i buy ehheh! I go with rav because of spare
    tire first of all

  • @dmitriibabaev8414
    @dmitriibabaev8414 Год назад +1

    Why does the car have exhaust pipes on the front bumper?

  • @leprechaunking4656
    @leprechaunking4656 Год назад

    So, what's the final scoring?

  • @kirkkronenberger877
    @kirkkronenberger877 Год назад

    Excellent review as always, men.

  • @Unsalted375
    @Unsalted375 Год назад +11

    This time I gotta say Honda dethrones rav4 in terms of exterior and interior styling now, nice job Honda.

  • @dbascb
    @dbascb Год назад +1

    I like CR-V Audio and remote start. As a bonus it’s a Honda.
    Excellent Review, Thank you

  • @fmstudio085
    @fmstudio085 Год назад +6

    In my opinion CR-V is more safe and comfortable than RAV4. But RAV4 has more options.

    • @mh0Ang95
      @mh0Ang95 Год назад +2

      Yea CR-V really sticks with best comfort in class. After all, you spend the most time in the cabin and its the more upscale feeling one imo

  • @sixthsky5376
    @sixthsky5376 Год назад +2

    Always bought Honda. They feel better and look better to me. Toyota is good but they are still stuck in 2013 with designs.

  • @disneyfoodie8774
    @disneyfoodie8774 Год назад +11

    Both are amazing cars. Honda has bigger cabin and looks better. But the toyota/lexus hybrid system is unmatched in reliability. We went Rav4 because we take weekend roadtips two times a month, drive about 3k miles a month, and in the end, we just wanted an efficient vehicle that will work with no issues for years to come.

  • @DeepakKumar-Welostinplaces
    @DeepakKumar-Welostinplaces Год назад

    Can we have a compare of 23 Rav4 Hybrid and 23 Tuscan Hybrid, please.

  • @KingIstvan
    @KingIstvan Год назад +2

    My friend Franck has cry and loves it

  • @Slim1986
    @Slim1986 Год назад +7

    I would pick the CRV, even tho it's missing some features

  • @ChristisKing117
    @ChristisKing117 11 месяцев назад +1

    I looked at both. The Honda feels like it has a lot more room and less blind spots. I don’t like Toyota’s subscription stuff either. Spend $40,000, but you have spend more to use features it has built in already. No thank you!

  • @kevinharbeson775
    @kevinharbeson775 Год назад +19

    Why didn't the CRV get at least a half point for auto start on the key without paying for a subscription that Toyota charges?

    • @azeeze1391
      @azeeze1391 Год назад +2

      I was thinking the same.

    • @wshaq986
      @wshaq986 Год назад +2

      The Toyota actually does have the auto start on the key fob aswell by pressing the lock button three times but they don't advertise it for some reason and most people won't know until figuring it out

    • @pt93music
      @pt93music Год назад +1

      Toyota offers remote start as a standard feature with the smart key system. You press the lock button twice and press and hold the lock button a 3rd time and it starts right up.

  • @JJ-xl2zu
    @JJ-xl2zu Год назад +2

    The Toyota hybrid seemed REALLY loud when accelerating or on the highway. Do you find that to be the case?

  • @JatinKumar-tu7xm
    @JatinKumar-tu7xm 11 месяцев назад

    Both are good . But from my POV Honda ditched the fog lights and there is no Fully digital 10 inch instrument cluster in CR-V.

  • @cheng6227
    @cheng6227 Год назад +2

    what about mazda cx-5 or cx-50?

  • @muhammadharits3237
    @muhammadharits3237 Год назад +3

    Mazda CX-5, KIA Sportage, hyundai Tucson 👍👍

  • @zak5715
    @zak5715 Год назад +61

    Would definitely go with the RAV4 for all the upscale features (cooled seats, pano moonroof, surround view camera) that aren’t even options on the CR-V.

    • @louis5555gmail
      @louis5555gmail Год назад +8

      What about the cable corrosion problem that plagues the RAV4 hybrid. Has it been solved?

    • @georgiafan6618
      @georgiafan6618 Год назад +12

      I rented a gas ‘22 RAV4 for 3 months. (I drive a full size truck). Brakes and handling were excellent. I avg’d 28 mpg - reaching 35 Hwy. Four cyl was buzzy and had a delay on initial throttle input but ride was excellent. Cargo space was good, interior space adequate for my 6’ - 3” frame. I just wish the hatch opening was taller. Interior quality really good and ergonomics were first rate. Dash lighting was very good, cloth seats comfortable. I’d get the faster hybrid with 40 mpg city. Rav4 has more features than the new Honda, another good car. RAV4’s small screen, base radio connected to my iPhone effortlessly and sound was surprisingly good. I recommend renting any car you’re thinking of buying. The rav4 is a very good crossover. 👍

    • @nancyhoesch9073
      @nancyhoesch9073 Год назад +4

      @@louis5555gmail that cable problem and reading about the Canadian owners' class action lawsuit has turned me away from the hybrid RAV4

    • @mr.t9529
      @mr.t9529 Год назад +3

      @@louis5555gmail it has been resolved! Since 2022 they have had the issue addressed 😎👍

    • @georgiafan6618
      @georgiafan6618 Год назад

      @David Each yet What I did was I hit the throttle before I took off to get the revs up. There might be a chip you can install that will change a setting in the computer. I’d contact a few of those performance companies who may make a tune for the rav4. Banks has a product called “pedal monster” which changes computer settings so the throttle is instantaneous. The vehicle feels faster but might not be faster. Look into it. If I had a diesel, I’d get it. RUclips videos seem to like the unit. The RAV4 is a good veh.

  • @angusmacdonald5300
    @angusmacdonald5300 4 месяца назад +1

    Really like the side by side comparisons on split screens! I test drove both these in 2024 models and I went for the nicer driving experience of the CRV (Sport L). Also, the RAV4 looks a bit dated now. Maybe the 2025 will have a sharper design. It would be nice to have a spare tire, though, Honda!

  • @cpl8168
    @cpl8168 Год назад +4

    The CR-V has gas struts for the hood. That's worth 1/2 point!

  • @blackbellanow
    @blackbellanow Год назад

    Please when listing price also state the currency. Ex - USD
    Also another review stated the dual exhaust for the CRV really only has 1 operational exhaust. The other one is there for looks.

  • @adeoyeisijola4987
    @adeoyeisijola4987 Год назад +6

    Am a fan of Honda but I just don’t understand why they are always behind in technology. No HUD, 360 camera, ventilated seat and rear view camera in this new age. It’s just too sad….

  • @Briguy1027
    @Briguy1027 Год назад +1

    LOL -- great review but you had different audio clips in your video so the RAV-4's audio actually sounded better to me through my speakers here at home. No worries, I love these type of reviews. I feel I can get the Sportage -- well when I can get it at MSRP and get the best of both of these sans the reliability for a lesser price.

    • @markmason5443
      @markmason5443 Год назад

      And a really poor trade value in the end

  • @Just-a-guy926
    @Just-a-guy926 Год назад +2

    Honda interiors are well designed with high quality plastic but if you take a closer look cost cutting is very obvious same for exterior.

  • @HumbleBearcat
    @HumbleBearcat Год назад +1

    How is the real world drivability at freeway speed with partial throttle? I wish the CRV comes with a spare tire. I don't care for panoramic roof because here in Southern California the weather is too hot.

  • @pinakmiku4999
    @pinakmiku4999 9 месяцев назад +2

    Honda is better looking! Honda killed it. Hope to get it soon!

  • @disco.lemonade
    @disco.lemonade Год назад +3

    If you aint loyal to any brand, just toss a coin. You just can't go wrong with literally the kings of the segment.