I have been visual observing for some time and decided to try astrophotography. This video made a difference me. I don't know cameras and processing lingo or processing at all. As I am getting frustrated I ran across this video. I now produce decent pictures of Jupiter and Saturn. I'm getting better every session because of this video. Thank you. I was about to get the eyepieces back out.
This comment means a great deal to me and is exactly why I wanted to put together a video like this! I will have an imaging video out for Mars this month and then Saturn after that. If I can help you with anything else please let me know! Clear Skies!
Great video. Thanks Again. For me, my biggest struggles are camera settings and processing. Example; I have a monochrome camera with RGB files of jupiter. I can't get any color from them. I feel like I'm one check box away from adding color but I can't figure it out.
This is going to be a big help to learn how to stack Saturn using PIPP Autostakkert and Registax. Been waiting weeks for clear skies but like waiting for a bus they will all come at once.
Really appreciate that you went through the entire image processing process. Your explanations clarified things and have made the various software manipulations comprehensible. Thank you for taking the time and effort to make this tutorial.
@@LateNightAstronomy Thank you, the telescope covered with ice but I managed to get these: imgur.com/a/7C5us2P Question: I have tons of Nebulae and Galaxies over the last near-year since I've started, mostly the same settings for the camera, I never used the other calibration frames and all I ever did was stack light frames for my results, as nice as they still are it's obvious I have some vignetting, and trying to merely edit it away with programs causes other issues with the image. Is it possible to retroactively add at the very least flat frames and see an improved result? I don't want all that data to go to waste! Thanks!
@@jasonnikolic You have to capture the flat frames using the same imaging setup and orientation as the night you took the original shots. There wouldn't be much benefit to go back and try to retake them.
@@LateNightAstronomy That doesn't sound difficult though. I'm always using the exact same orientation and setup. Basically it sounds like there WOULD be some benefit to at least try :)
Hi very helpful in my quest to understand Autostakkert and Registax. I did note that at 7.39 based on how i understood your explanation, i think you are misinterpreting what % of frames meet the 50% quality threshold. You need to find the point where the green line crosses the horizontal . you may have since worked that out since the video was posted but I thought I woudl point it out, for other people like me on a quest, it may help. I only know this due to the great video Emil did and which is linked to RUclips from the AS download site. 22.47 in that video he covers this point. This may improve further the great image of Jupiter. Clear Skys! :-)
Thanks for your comment and video suggestion from the AS website. For this video, I wanted to try out a high percentage of frames so I picked 90 percent even though the quality of some of those dipped below the 50 percent threshold as you mentioned. It is probably better practice to want to stay above the 50 percent threshold line which would have made my total stacked frames for this footage be more around 45% or so. Great comment and great suggestion for others on how to get the most out of these images. What type of equipment are you working with for planetary imaging?
Excellent video - I have beat myself up so may times trying to process images. I get pretty darn good snap-shot level images of Jupiter but fail miserably at processing them. I never knew how to use all four of the software packages you showed in your video. I am going to get there yet - Thank you for your video and instruction.
Followed step by step, first time with dslr, and the result was great! Learning the software was tricky, and the GIMP download crashed my computer. None-the-less, I have a photo of Jupiter that I never thought possible! I wish I could show you!
That's amazing. Feel free to go to the about section of my RUclips page. There you will find my email address if you click for it. Feel free to send me your Jupiter shot. I would love to see it!
Thanks. Just got into astrophotography. Started with solar images. Didn't really need registax for that, but with the planets I just stafted imaging, registax was a game changer. Noise was an issue thoigh, but you just schooled me on that. Also the RGB alignment helped. Side note, gotta hand it to tue Orion XT8s. Scope I've used for 20 years. It's amazing what you can do with those things. The ultimate starter scope that will last most people a life time. Amazing image from a $500 scope, without the goto features.
thank you for this ! after watching i dont know how many videos from other people I have found one that actually helps. Subscribed to your channel sometime ago but finally had time to take a proper look, wish had looked before. really well explained process that makes sense!
I appreciate that, Mark. Thanks for the support and stop back by again soon. I'll have more video coming out soon on deep sky imaging and some upcoming meteor showers to catch.
This was very helpful, and easy to follow demonstration. After watching your video I was able to process a clip I took of Jupiter with my cellphone, and was pleasantly surprised with the end result. I had taken several clips of Jupiter, and I want to know how to combine more than one clip to process one image, if that's possible. So what I want to be able to do is stack two or three one minute clips together, to get one final image.
Thanks so much for letting me know that! If the videos were taken back to back it may work, but Jupiter rotates quickly and details will start to blur.
Been doing visual astronomy since 2019 and this year i wanted to do some astrophotography. My telescope is not so much powerful but i can get decent stuff from it. Thank you for the video it really helped me a lot. I was looking for a tutorial like this.
@@LateNightAstronomy I wonder if you could do a similar video on Saturn. I tried it out but wasn't able to get a lot of detail, especially the Cassini Division and the North Pole. It would be great to see what magnification works best, as well as the best Registax and GIMP settings. Thanks again!
Keep it real and to the point and thanks for the video.Do use Sky and Telescope Pocket Sky Atlas and recommend this to everyone so they can find the objects you suggest. Thanks
@@LateNightAstronomy First try was a bit small, so I got a 2x Barlow adapter. That made for a bigger image, although a challenge to keep in view. But I'm happy with the outcome - nice bands and decent color. I know I could do better with more attempts and better equipment (I have a Meade ETX125 and Canon T5i.) The learning is the best part of all this. Again, thanks so much for this helpful tutorial!
I'd just like to thank you for the video (quality of the video could be a little better to see the options you're selecting) but your tutorial has helped me get pictures that I just couldn't do alone. Much appreciated from here!
@@LateNightAstronomy I'll continue working on improving, now that I've been able to align the scope I've been trying to capture at 640x480, it's much harder than I expected to keep it in frame. How many frames do you think is minimum for deeper textures?
@@LateNightAstronomy just a quick question, and I am sorry to bother you. I have an older Acer laptop that probably has XP Pro or Vista... I forget. My brother is going to wipe it and put in the latest Linux os. Will the programs that you used for the video be available in a Linux format? Thank you, again, for all of your help... you really walk everyone through the procedures with such a simplistic ease that even a dinosaur like me will be able to work it out!
@@meninomichael I believe most of them shown in this video are windows only but in the download description of autostakkert3 for examples it does say that "it does run fine using Wine under both Linux". My guess is that may be true for the others as well!
Hello Michael. This video really helped me to process an image of Jupiter and I'm quite pleased so far. I do have a question: With the extendable adaptor, you just connect that with the camera and Barlow lens, right? There is no other lens that you placed inside of the adaptor? And just how important is an extension tube? Is that something that a beginner astrophotographer will need?
Correct, there is nothing else in my imaging chain except. Extendable adapter, 2x barlow lens and the DSRL. I needed the extendable adapter because of the point where my telescope focuses at. Some telescopes are different and might night require it.
Thank you for taking this step-by-step. My final image still looks exactly like the original video -- absolutely no added clarity. I don't know what I am doing wrong, and there is so little instruction on using these software packages that I cannot troubleshoot.
@@LateNightAstronomy I use a Canon M50 through a Celestron C90. Prime focus, since I can never get it to focus through an eyepiece. The result is not particularly big, as one might expect.
@@LateNightAstronomy I did end up getting a barlow, and I have been able to get some decent pictures through it and a 12.5mm eyepiece. I figured out where I was falling short, though I did get a good picture before I fixed the problem (which made things very frustrating -- knowing that I got it right one time, and that I could not reproduce the result). I rewatched the video a few times, and had overlooked that you use manual video mode. I neglected to go into manual, so planets ended up looking like fuzzy tennis balls. That simple fix -- all the way at the beginning -- saved me frustration throughout the software steps. Thanks again for this video. It's got all the info a newcomer would need, without bogging us down with too many details.
@Late Night Astronomy Great video - thanks for taking the steps one-by-one to explain PIPP and Autostakkert in particular. Tell me, what would be the effective focal length of your telescope system? I ask because I have 800mm f6.3 lens for my camera and wonder how it would compare.. thanks again for excellent instruction. Cheers..
With the imaging setup I used in this video, I had a 3x barlow lens on my 1200mm f5.9 telescope so I would have been shooting at 3,600mm and F18. These were also shot on a Canon cropped sensor which adds a bit more as well.
@@LateNightAstronomy thanks so much for the reply and info. That really helps set my expectations. I'm shooting with Olympus Micro Four Thirds so 2x crop factor and full frame equivalent of 800mm. I can add a 2x teleconverter making total of 1600mm @f13. Will practice and see what I can accomplish. Thanks again
Echoing ArtofAngels comments below. I downloaded the software you recommended and followed your tutorial, step by step. The result isn't great the first time I've done it, because I overexposed my videos and didn't "bracket" with different ISOs. However, the stacked, sharpened result of Jupiter's disk and its four satellites was already excellent. Looking forward to a clear sky to repeat the process using correctly-exposed frames. Do you have any more similar videos? What about one using DSS and AstroTools for deep-sky objects? Thank you.
Thanks for a fantastic video. Very easy to follow and helps no end. Through this I've realised that my old data is actually OK, it's been my processing which has caused issues. I have a video with a blue filter which brings out a lot more of the band details. How could I change or combine this to bring back the real colours?
Hello, Really great video. You made it sound simple enough to make me want to try :) Quick question though, how long is the recorded video on your scope?
Great video, very informative. Why 1080P and not higher res like 4K? Also, why not do a sequence of raw photos rather than video? Wouldn't that yield better resolution? Just getting started, myself.
Great questions. My camera can only shoot 1080p. If yours can shook 4k, go for it. It's more important to get a faster frame rate to pic out the best frames to stack. 1080p at 120 FPS could yield better results than 4k at 30 FPS.
Great Video, I have only just begun this superb hobby and I have a celestron starsense explore dx130 and a canon eos 250d, if I attach a x2 barlow and extender will i be able to reproduce images like this? tbh I have struggled with phone mounts to get anything decent. Also do we need to set metering to anything specific?
I think you've got a great setup to get started. Jupiter is still out right now and is a great target to test your equipment on. Give it a try with a 2x or 3x barlow lens and let me know how it goes.
This is excellent, with this I'm going to attempt my first real imaging session with Jupiter. Question though, does the stacking have to be done with a video or can individual photos be stacked? I haven't been able to find a tutorial on how to do that.
When doing the planets you want as many frames as possible which is why I shoot at the highest quality fps my camera can handle. When I shoot long exposure shots of deep sky objects it's RAW files all the way!
Superb instructions, I am working my way through following your instructions after my first ever night imaging using AVI of a planet. Only issue is my image of Jupiter is so bright no detail can be seen, even at an ISO of 200 using prime focus. Should I use a moon filter next time? (Telescope: 127mm mak, Canon 1000D).
Yes, try out a lunar filter. Try out iso 100 and if you are able to adjust the shutter speed, do that as well to dim your target. Glad you found this helpful.
Thank you very much for this tutorial. It helped me out. I would like to ask if it is better to shoot in 4K 30fps than 1080p 60fps? Which one do you prefer for getting the best quality possible? Thank you. 😀
This is a great question. My gut would tell me to try out 4K 30fps just to test out that higher pixel count on the planet. Give both a try on the same night and go through the same processing techniques to see which worked best. Stop back by and let me know which wins.
Hi Michael. How are you? Thank you for the great video. I have read that Autostakkert can do all of the functions of PIPP & that PIPP is no longer needed - is that true, or do I lose quality by doing that? I have a GoTo feature on my telescope. Am I better off locking on the planet with the GoTo while I make my video, or is it better to not track and just let the planet pass through the field of view? Thanks again!
I'm doing great and am glad you found the video helpful. I have not read that about Autostakkert but hope it is true. Anything to simplify the process is a good thing. If you have a goto and it can track use that feature! You will be able to capture many more frames than me which could lead to much better results. Remember that there is a limit as to how much you can capture even with tracking due to the rotation of the planets. I believe the limit is typically 1 to 2 minutes but it varies from planet to planet. An internet search of that should provide you with some more accurate answers on planet rotation and imaging.
Very good video. I have tinkered with a friends NexImage camera and plan to try my DSLR. Curious...why do you try to focus on the passing Jupiter image, rather than just focus the whole train on a bright star to make it as small as possible when zoomed? Isn't focus for a particular optical train focused for all celestial objects?
Thank you for your comment! I have found it frustrating to center stars (even brighter ones) with the DSLR connected due to how dim they can be when they are slightly unfocused and how magnified they are with the Barlow Lens connected. You are correct that a very bright star like Vega would work just as well and probably even better at getting sharp focus before the imaging begins. Thanks for the suggestion and clear skies!
@@LateNightAstronomy Yes. Very dim until I crank the ISO up and shutter speed on live view. I sometimes use a magnifying glass to exam it in live view. I have marked the tube on my focuser tube with black sharpie at 25mm eyepiece and Nikon D5300 to get near focus fast. Shows up great on those silver Orion tubes even in the dark.
Good question. You can by atmospheric dispersion correctors for visual and imaging of planets. The effectiveness will vary but it may be something to look up and see if it interests you.
I'm learning so much from your channel, thank you! I'm new to this incredible field and I can't wait for clearer skies. What kind of eyepiece would you recommende me for observing Jupiter?
I appreciate your kind words. Check out this video I did on budget eyepieces for telescopes and let me know what you thing of some of the options I mention in the video. ruclips.net/video/8utkTFhDK5c/видео.html What telescope you have?
@@LateNightAstronomy I will definitely check your video, thanks! I have a dobson skywatcher 150p and I'm a little indecisive about buying a new eyepiece (I already have a 25mm and a 10mm that came with the telescope) or a barlow lens 2x!
@@Dances_With_Skies I use those for deep sky imaging but not for planetary imaging. I don't believe they would be beneficial for how the planets are imaged and processed.
New subscriber. Question; between the Orion StarShoot 3mp Solar System V Imaging Camera and the 1.3mp, which would you choose for imaging Jupiter. Telescope is Orion XT8 plus, seeing conditions usually moderate, sometimes good (minimal light polluted area).
Thanks for your support! Having not used either of them I would recommend going with the 3mp simply based off of reviews. Before you purchase that, have you ever tried connecting a cell phone adapter to your telescope to image the moon and planets. Check out this video I made to see how the process works. ruclips.net/video/C8EIyocVRJI/видео.html
Great simple tutorial thank you. I have an Orion xt8 too. I have no Barlow yet only 12mm bst eyepiece. I am thinking of buying a 3x Barlow but I will be using a phone to record for now. Do you think that's the right setup?
Does your phone have optical zoom? I would probably go with a 2x barlow lens at this point. Best for visual use and imaging with your current equipment.
Hey. Great informative video, thank you for this! I have question, Jupiter is best when it’s zoomed 3x4 times with phone’s zoom. So it won’t be like a 45 second long video with my 80mm Powerseeker f/11 Refractor. It’s rather 4-5 second video, do you think it’ll be good enough as a 45 sec. video? Or do you have any advice like should I rather take as many photos I can and put them in the software? Cheers!
Am I correct that you use the digital zoom only for adjusting focus? You don't say you turn it off for actual recording, but your video shows Jupiter in record is much smaller than when your fine tuning the focus.
I'm responding to the overall thread and not whoever that user is shown. I deleted it once thinking I hit reply on someone's comment. But it did it again.
Thank you for this video . Can you please tell me what telescope you’re using and how you were able to get the image so large and clear Does the magnification of the 3x Barlow depend on how the adjustable adaptor is set ( full in vs full out ? ) Thank you
Good question. The setup consist only of my telescope, a 3x barlow lens, canon adapter and my dslr camera. I try to shoot the planets when they are highest in the sky and conditions are very calm. That gives me a focal ration of roughly 3600mm for the scope I am using.
@@LateNightAstronomy thank you for your reply . I have an Orion 8” diameter x 1000 mm focal length . My 2x Barlow did not make the image large enough - so I used eye piece projection with a 6mm eyepiece . From experimentation - the 6mm eye piece gives me a 9x magnification over prime . The image was still not as large as yours . I’m missing something . Thank you for your help .
That is a great suggestion. I have had moderate success with doing that. If I figure out a way to do it without a telescope that tracks I'll put it in a future Jupiter video.
Hi, Great videos, what telescope do you use to get your images? I have a Celestron Astro Fi 5 its an SCT just under 5" with 1250 focal length, can I get the same kind of images attaching my Canon 1200D to it. Thanks
Thanks so much. I use the Orion XT8i telescope. For the brighter planets, I bet you could get images that rival mine if the sky is clear and steady! Let me know if you have anymore questions!
typically fine video, thanks. A somewhat related question: is that the Bubble Nebula atop the page? I was just photographing it the other night, thinking it would be a nice blue color, and my images are all bright red. I wonder if it's a color calibration issue. Or is that a different nebula or star cluster?
Thanks so much for the compliment! The image at the top of my banner is the Orion Nebula. Is the bubble nebula itself red or the entire frame? Also, what do you use to image and process? My Deep Sky images used to have a heavy green tone to them due to my DSLR but once I started using PixInsight's background extraction and color calibration tools it took care of it.
Thanks for this wonderful video! Two questions: a) what eyepiece did you use with your telescope?; b) When I am trying to take movie using my Canon camera, 600D, I get over saturated image at 3200 ISO. I have experimented with different parameters but the situation did not improve much. I know I am stretching the limits of my 6" OTA. I will appreciate your advise.
Thanks very much! I don't use an eyepiece for this type of setup. Just the telescope, 3x barlow, T-ring Extendable Adapter and Camera. Try shooting at iso's below 3200 and if things are still too bright maybe try throwing a lunar filter on the barlow lens. My guess is though that an ISO around 400/800 or so should solve your problem.
@@christopherleveck6835 Are you shooing video of the planets. For video, I tend to find 800 good for Jupiter and 3200 good for Saturn. The noise after stacking the planets video frames can often be dealt with in Registax.
can i ask why you needed the extendable camera adapter ,,,would a fixed extender work the same ? i have a 10 inch dosonian and a canon 60d not tried this setup yet but your video is awesome.
Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. Without the extendable adapter I can't get proper focus for some reason. That may be different for certain telescopes and cameras, but for mine its the case!
Thank you for the video. It was very helpful. I have tried to photograph Jupiter with the settings you suggested but the image is blown out and so there isn't very much detail. I am using a Canon Mark IV 5D attached to an 8" Celestron on a AVX mount. I am also using a 3x barlow lens. I am able to center and track Jupiter with no problem but the video image of Jupiter is more white than dark like yours. So, I used a lower ISO to darken it but I'm still not getting very many clear details. Should I try using a Bahtinov Focus Mask on Jupiter first in order to try to attain better focus?
@@iFindSermons That's intersting. If you'd like to share the picture with me to take a look at it feel free to email it to the email account listed in the about section of my youtube channel.
I have a Celestron 130EQ Astromaster telescope. Whenever I look at Jupiter I just see a bright ball of light with its moons surrounding it. I purchased a 6mm planetary viewing eyepiece, hopefully I can get a better view. Do you think this will change anything? Thanks for the video, really helped me out!
The 6mm eyepiece should give you about 108x magnification with your telescope. I get some great views of Jupiter at that magnification through my telescope. Let me know how the change looks once you get it!
Good questions. I have the Orion XT8i. It is a manually push to telescope with no motors. I find the planets and let them float along the field of view to capture the images I take of them. I do not use a coma corrector but have read good things about them for fast scopes and visual observing.
Hi. Great image. Unfortunately, all my laptop, computer, phone are Apple. I have nothing Windows whatsoever so I believe I cannot use Registax or Autostakkert etc. Do you know if there are any. mac equivalents?
@@LateNightAstronomy I'm hopeless trying to get anything set up on a computer which is not just download and set up/open. The idea of going into Bootcamp (I don't even know how it all works) fills me with dread and I've read even people who know this stuff come up with issues when using it. I'm zero skilled at debugging.
When you use the Astromania 1.25" Extendable Camera Adapter do you use a eye piece too. Its not stated and I guess you dont your using the tube to help to get to correct focal lenght or if you do use and I piece what power is it
Thank you for the reply, Im using a 2x barlow with my DSLR and can obtain focal distance and go to 5 or 10x to bring it it focus, but as soon as I hit record it drops out of 5 or 10x zoom and records as a small target and when viewed the file its small unless I zoom in and processing is the same, was wondering if its the 2x barlow causing the problem and should go with a 3x barlow. Tnx agian
@@LateNightAstronomy I finally thought it might be the telescope its William Optics 73mm f/5.9 ZenithStar FPL53 Doublet APO Refractor Ive got an older Meade reflector Starfinder 10". Ive been try to get it set up on the Orion atlas II mount but just scope, rings and camera pushes it close to the 44 pound rating.
@@mikelarson1018 That is a very nice scope for deep sky imaging but the 430mm is going to be tough to use for planets! The images I end up with in this video were captured with a 1200mm focal length x 3x barlow lens. Effectively making it a 3600mm scope.
I'm about to try your process, but in previous attempts to image Jupiter it was just too over exposed, you make no mention of any filters used, if you did, can you elaborate please?
I did not se any filters with this setup. Try adjusting down the ISO or possibly after that using a lunar filter for its brightness. But in most cases taking video and adjusting the ISO should do the trick
This might seem like sorta a dumb question but your tutorial is helping really nicely but my photos of jupiter are very small as i dont have a high magnification, of course when i zoom in on the photo it gets more blurry, is there some way to counteract the blurryness but still have a fairly good sized image? Or is that not possible
@@LateNightAstronomy a nextstar4se i thought that too but im already on the edge of my magnification so wont the barlow double it and exceed the max magnification?
If you stack a 2x or 3x barlow onto that I bet you could get some nice results on a clear and steady night as long as your telescope could handle the weight of that setup.
The 5x magnification is a digital zoom I use on the camera just for focusing. The camera can't record at 5x digital and I like to only record with optical zoom.
Wish I could image Jupiter... My telescope isn't able to make the bands out sadly so its not so interesting to look at as it's just a white circle. If you have any recommendations on how I could get the bands to appear please let me know I have been trying for a while now and have tried many solutions but wasn't successful. I have the Orion 10015 4.5 inch tabletop telescope!
I have been visual observing for some time and decided to try astrophotography. This video made a difference me. I don't know cameras and processing lingo or processing at all. As I am getting frustrated I ran across this video. I now produce decent pictures of Jupiter and Saturn. I'm getting better every session because of this video. Thank you. I was about to get the eyepieces back out.
This comment means a great deal to me and is exactly why I wanted to put together a video like this! I will have an imaging video out for Mars this month and then Saturn after that. If I can help you with anything else please let me know! Clear Skies!
Great video. Thanks Again. For me, my biggest struggles are camera settings and processing. Example; I have a monochrome camera with RGB files of jupiter. I can't get any color from them. I feel like I'm one check box away from adding color but I can't figure it out.
This is going to be a big help to learn how to stack Saturn using PIPP Autostakkert and Registax. Been waiting weeks for clear skies but like waiting for a bus they will all come at once.
I appreciate that! I've got another version of this video coming out soon and Mars and then one on Saturn after that! Clear skies!
Thanks, I followed your steps and installed the mentioned programs and I successfully created my first Jupiter image.
Congratulations on your image! I was out trying to image Saturn last night but a thin layer of clouds hurt the image a bit.
You don't even understand how grateful I am for this video. Thank you
You're welcome. That's very nice of you to say and please let me know if you have any questions.
Really appreciate that you went through the entire image processing process. Your explanations clarified things and have made the various software manipulations comprehensible. Thank you for taking the time and effort to make this tutorial.
Your comment means a lot to me. I enjoy putting together these videos and am glad you find them helpful.
I did this step-by-step with you and finally learnt how to edit. Thank you! My Jupiter turned out great!
That's exactly the type of comment I want to hear! Take care and clear skies!
@@LateNightAstronomy Thank you, the telescope covered with ice but I managed to get these: imgur.com/a/7C5us2P
Question: I have tons of Nebulae and Galaxies over the last near-year since I've started, mostly the same settings for the camera, I never used the other calibration frames and all I ever did was stack light frames for my results, as nice as they still are it's obvious I have some vignetting, and trying to merely edit it away with programs causes other issues with the image. Is it possible to retroactively add at the very least flat frames and see an improved result? I don't want all that data to go to waste! Thanks!
@@jasonnikolic You have to capture the flat frames using the same imaging setup and orientation as the night you took the original shots. There wouldn't be much benefit to go back and try to retake them.
@@LateNightAstronomy That doesn't sound difficult though. I'm always using the exact same orientation and setup. Basically it sounds like there WOULD be some benefit to at least try :)
Hi very helpful in my quest to understand Autostakkert and Registax. I did note that at 7.39 based on how i understood your explanation, i think you are misinterpreting what % of frames meet the 50% quality threshold. You need to find the point where the green line crosses the horizontal . you may have since worked that out since the video was posted but I thought I woudl point it out, for other people like me on a quest, it may help. I only know this due to the great video Emil did and which is linked to RUclips from the AS download site. 22.47 in that video he covers this point. This may improve further the great image of Jupiter. Clear Skys! :-)
Thanks for your comment and video suggestion from the AS website. For this video, I wanted to try out a high percentage of frames so I picked 90 percent even though the quality of some of those dipped below the 50 percent threshold as you mentioned. It is probably better practice to want to stay above the 50 percent threshold line which would have made my total stacked frames for this footage be more around 45% or so. Great comment and great suggestion for others on how to get the most out of these images. What type of equipment are you working with for planetary imaging?
Excellent video - I have beat myself up so may times trying to process images. I get pretty darn good snap-shot level images of Jupiter but fail miserably at processing them. I never knew how to use all four of the software packages you showed in your video. I am going to get there yet - Thank you for your video and instruction.
Best of luck to you and please feel free to share what you capture with me over on Instagram @latenightastronomy
Followed step by step, first time with dslr, and the result was great! Learning the software was tricky, and the GIMP download crashed my computer. None-the-less, I have a photo of Jupiter that I never thought possible! I wish I could show you!
That's amazing. Feel free to go to the about section of my RUclips page. There you will find my email address if you click for it. Feel free to send me your Jupiter shot. I would love to see it!
Nice presentation
Thank you!
He can do better not possessing it then me possessing it. Props to this man
This is the best video I've seen online on capturing jupiter! Great work!
I really appreciate that and am glad you found it helpful!
I don't usually leave comments but this was an excellent video. Easy to follow steps. Thank you for taking the time to share this. Much appreciated.
That is very kind of you to say and I appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! Take care and clear skies!
I like you did this without tracking. That helps keep the cost down.
Exactly! High dollar equipment is wonderful but there is so much we can do with imaging even without it.
Thanks. Just got into astrophotography. Started with solar images. Didn't really need registax for that, but with the planets I just stafted imaging, registax was a game changer.
Noise was an issue thoigh, but you just schooled me on that. Also the RGB alignment helped.
Side note, gotta hand it to tue Orion XT8s. Scope I've used for 20 years. It's amazing what you can do with those things. The ultimate starter scope that will last most people a life time.
Amazing image from a $500 scope, without the goto features.
I could not agree with you more about an 8 inch dobsonian. Thanks for your comment and clear skies!
Very nice video. I Never thought about keeping the histogram open to see what differences the wavelets produce to it.
Thank you 👍
You are very welcome. Clear skies and stop back by if you have any questions!
thank you for this ! after watching i dont know how many videos from other people I have found one that actually helps.
Subscribed to your channel sometime ago but finally had time to take a proper look, wish had looked before.
really well explained process that makes sense!
I appreciate that, Mark. Thanks for the support and stop back by again soon. I'll have more video coming out soon on deep sky imaging and some upcoming meteor showers to catch.
Really this is my most awaited video!!! Thanks Michael sir👍👍
Glad to hear it! Thanks for your support!!!
Finally started using PIPP after watching the video
Glad to hear it. Clear skies and let me know if you have any questions!
This was very helpful, and easy to follow demonstration. After watching your video I was able to process a clip I took of Jupiter with my cellphone, and was pleasantly surprised with the end result. I had taken several clips of Jupiter, and I want to know how to combine more than one clip to process one image, if that's possible. So what I want to be able to do is stack two or three one minute clips together, to get one final image.
Thanks so much for letting me know that! If the videos were taken back to back it may work, but Jupiter rotates quickly and details will start to blur.
Excellent, excellent end-to-end tutorial. Many thanks!
That's very kind of you! Glad you enjoyed it!
Very helpful step by step explanation of how to do this - got my first Jupiter image results! Very impressive.
Glad it helped! Congratulations on your image!
Been doing visual astronomy since 2019 and this year i wanted to do some astrophotography. My telescope is not so much powerful but i can get decent stuff from it.
Thank you for the video it really helped me a lot. I was looking for a tutorial like this.
I hope this you find this and my other content helpful as you continue to explore the night sky!
Excellent example and tutorial. I tried it out and worked out great! Awesome pictures of Jupiter! Thank you!!
I appreciate your feedback! Congrats on some awesome images of Jupiter and clear skies!
@@LateNightAstronomy I wonder if you could do a similar video on Saturn. I tried it out but wasn't able to get a lot of detail, especially the Cassini Division and the North Pole. It would be great to see what magnification works best, as well as the best Registax and GIMP settings. Thanks again!
@@thereisaidthat You have read my mind. I will be doing a similar video for Saturn in September and Mars in October!
your channel is so underrated you are a good guy and i hope you will get blessed with high subscribers
That is very kind of you to say. I appreciate your support!
Cheers to a properly produced demo video. Your videos are ripe with knowledge.
Thank you very much!
Keep it real and to the point and thanks for the video.Do use Sky and Telescope Pocket Sky Atlas and recommend this to everyone so they can find the objects you suggest. Thanks
Great suggestion and thanks for your comment!
excellent result. I have just bought a basic kit to get into astro and im in a dark area in UK so I will get imaging! Thanks for the editing tutorial
Anytime! Let me know how it goes for you!
Thank you - Your tutorial really improved my work with planetary imaging
I appreciate you saying that! Let me know if you ever have any questions!
Thank you for this vid. It will pull me on to the next level with my various sharpcap captures so far with my 8"SCT. 👍
I'm so glad to hear that!
Thanks! So many people have recommended various software packages, but I haven't seen how to USE them.
Glad it was helpful and thank you so much for supporting me and the channel!
This is really a great tutorial. I'm heading out now to try!
Thanks so much and let me know how it turned out for you!
@@LateNightAstronomy First try was a bit small, so I got a 2x Barlow adapter. That made for a bigger image, although a challenge to keep in view. But I'm happy with the outcome - nice bands and decent color. I know I could do better with more attempts and better equipment (I have a Meade ETX125 and Canon T5i.) The learning is the best part of all this. Again, thanks so much for this helpful tutorial!
Wow! First guide that actually helped me, the image turned out great! Thanks a lot!!
I appreciate you sharing that with me! Take care and clear skies!
this was what i was looking for, when i finally buy my telescope i will put it into practice
Glad to hear. What scope? Stop back by and let me know how everything goes! Clear Skies.
@@LateNightAstronomy I have a 90/500 mm refractor in mind, luckily I live in the cleanest skies in the world
@@MegaNIKONIKO Wonderful! You will take good advantage of those skies.
New subscriber. Thanks for your excellent videos. I don't know why you haven't ten times as many subscribers yet.... but you will, I'm sure.
I appreciate your support! Help me spread the word about the channel. It's been enjoyable posting regular content over the past year.
I'd just like to thank you for the video (quality of the video could be a little better to see the options you're selecting) but your tutorial has helped me get pictures that I just couldn't do alone. Much appreciated from here!
I'm glad you found it helpful. Let me know if I can help you with anything else.
@@LateNightAstronomy I'll continue working on improving, now that I've been able to align the scope I've been trying to capture at 640x480, it's much harder than I expected to keep it in frame. How many frames do you think is minimum for deeper textures?
@@davidgargan5330 It’s hard to say. I normally am working with 2,000 to 3,000 frames. If seeing conditions are excellent you won’t need as many.
Wow, that was amazing! Thank you very much. Looking forward to wearing one of the t-shirts... when Winter is over here in New York!
I appreciate that! Take care and clear skies!
@@LateNightAstronomy just a quick question, and I am sorry to bother you. I have an older Acer laptop that probably has XP Pro or Vista... I forget. My brother is going to wipe it and put in the latest Linux os. Will the programs that you used for the video be available in a Linux format? Thank you, again, for all of your help... you really walk everyone through the procedures with such a simplistic ease that even a dinosaur like me will be able to work it out!
@@meninomichael I believe most of them shown in this video are windows only but in the download description of autostakkert3 for examples it does say that "it does run fine using Wine under both Linux". My guess is that may be true for the others as well!
@@LateNightAstronomy great. Thank you very much, and clear skies to you, too.
Thank you for this detailed video ,it helped me to capture Callisto's shadow on the planet as well as the great red spot
You're very welcome
I love Jupiter!!! One of my fav planets in this galaxy.🤪
Me too!!!!!
*in this solar system*
There are much better planets in the galaxy you see.
Best tutorial! Was able to get some details out of my puny Jupiter captures :-)
So glad to hear that! Stop back by if you ever have any questions!
Amazing video, I'll hopefully get to use all of your techniques tonight and tomorrow!
Wonderful! Let me know if you have any questions along the way.
Hello Michael. This video really helped me to process an image of Jupiter and I'm quite pleased so far. I do have a question: With the extendable adaptor, you just connect that with the camera and Barlow lens, right? There is no other lens that you placed inside of the adaptor?
And just how important is an extension tube? Is that something that a beginner astrophotographer will need?
Correct, there is nothing else in my imaging chain except. Extendable adapter, 2x barlow lens and the DSRL. I needed the extendable adapter because of the point where my telescope focuses at. Some telescopes are different and might night require it.
@@LateNightAstronomy That's good to know. Thank you so much for your help.
Thank you for taking this step-by-step. My final image still looks exactly like the original video -- absolutely no added clarity. I don't know what I am doing wrong, and there is so little instruction on using these software packages that I cannot troubleshoot.
What equipment are you using to capture your image of Jupiter?
@@LateNightAstronomy I use a Canon M50 through a Celestron C90. Prime focus, since I can never get it to focus through an eyepiece. The result is not particularly big, as one might expect.
@@joshmeyer7384 Yeah, the only suggestion I would make it to maybe put a 2x barlow on it to see if it can handle that.
@@LateNightAstronomy I did end up getting a barlow, and I have been able to get some decent pictures through it and a 12.5mm eyepiece. I figured out where I was falling short, though I did get a good picture before I fixed the problem (which made things very frustrating -- knowing that I got it right one time, and that I could not reproduce the result).
I rewatched the video a few times, and had overlooked that you use manual video mode. I neglected to go into manual, so planets ended up looking like fuzzy tennis balls. That simple fix -- all the way at the beginning -- saved me frustration throughout the software steps.
Thanks again for this video. It's got all the info a newcomer would need, without bogging us down with too many details.
@Late Night Astronomy Great video - thanks for taking the steps one-by-one to explain PIPP and Autostakkert in particular. Tell me, what would be the effective focal length of your telescope system? I ask because I have 800mm f6.3 lens for my camera and wonder how it would compare.. thanks again for excellent instruction. Cheers..
With the imaging setup I used in this video, I had a 3x barlow lens on my 1200mm f5.9 telescope so I would have been shooting at 3,600mm and F18. These were also shot on a Canon cropped sensor which adds a bit more as well.
@@LateNightAstronomy thanks so much for the reply and info. That really helps set my expectations. I'm shooting with Olympus Micro Four Thirds so 2x crop factor and full frame equivalent of 800mm. I can add a 2x teleconverter making total of 1600mm @f13. Will practice and see what I can accomplish. Thanks again
Really Nice Tutorial!
I appreciate that! Thank you.
Great video, thank you for sharing your technique.
That's very kind of you to say! Take care and clear skies!
Another great video!! Thanks!!
My pleasure!
Echoing ArtofAngels comments below. I downloaded the software you recommended and followed your tutorial, step by step. The result isn't great the first time I've done it, because I overexposed my videos and didn't "bracket" with different ISOs. However, the stacked, sharpened result of Jupiter's disk and its four satellites was already excellent. Looking forward to a clear sky to repeat the process using correctly-exposed frames. Do you have any more similar videos? What about one using DSS and AstroTools for deep-sky objects? Thank you.
If you go to my playlist on Astrophotography I've got video tutorials on several planets and also how to captured deep sky objects. Take care!
Excellent tuto: simple et efficient ; à pratiquer asap 👍
Best of luck with your image!
@@LateNightAstronomy thx. Posted on FB in few group (Siril, astronomie pour débutant, site webastro)
Thanks for a fantastic video. Very easy to follow and helps no end. Through this I've realised that my old data is actually OK, it's been my processing which has caused issues. I have a video with a blue filter which brings out a lot more of the band details. How could I change or combine this to bring back the real colours?
Good question. I would suggest working with the RGB settings in registax or a program like GIMP. Pull back on the blue and see what happens.
great as always...
I'm glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for the comment!
Very helpful video. - Thank you. Happy holidays. :)
Glad you enjoyed it. Happy Holidays and let me know if you have any questions about astrophotography!
Awesome vid! Would you mind linking the "extendable camera adapter"?
Of course, I'll add it to the description of the video and thanks for your comment!
Hello, Really great video. You made it sound simple enough to make me want to try :) Quick question though, how long is the recorded video on your scope?
Thanks and I'm glad you enjoyed the video! The recorded video from my scope that I used to process the image was about 35 seconds shot at 60 FPS.
Great video very helpful 👍
Thank you!
Well done lad.
I appreciate that! Clear Skies!
Great video, very informative. Why 1080P and not higher res like 4K? Also, why not do a sequence of raw photos rather than video? Wouldn't that yield better resolution? Just getting started, myself.
Great questions. My camera can only shoot 1080p. If yours can shook 4k, go for it. It's more important to get a faster frame rate to pic out the best frames to stack. 1080p at 120 FPS could yield better results than 4k at 30 FPS.
Great Video, I have only just begun this superb hobby and I have a celestron starsense explore dx130 and a canon eos 250d, if I attach a x2 barlow and extender will i be able to reproduce images like this? tbh I have struggled with phone mounts to get anything decent.
Also do we need to set metering to anything specific?
I think you've got a great setup to get started. Jupiter is still out right now and is a great target to test your equipment on. Give it a try with a 2x or 3x barlow lens and let me know how it goes.
Mr. Martin. That was a great video. How did you learn all this? Amazing.
Thanks so much for your support and let me know if you ever have any questions!
thanks alot! this was a really good straight forward turtorial, definitely helped.
I'm glad it helped you. Let me know if you have and more questions along the way.
thanks for the tutorial.
Anytime. Let me know if you have any questions during the process.
@@LateNightAstronomy ok
This is excellent, with this I'm going to attempt my first real imaging session with Jupiter. Question though, does the stacking have to be done with a video or can individual photos be stacked? I haven't been able to find a tutorial on how to do that.
I've only ever seen it done with video. Let me know if you have any questions along the way.
Great great video. Why not shooting raw? Would that not get better data or is it just easier to work with a movie.
When doing the planets you want as many frames as possible which is why I shoot at the highest quality fps my camera can handle. When I shoot long exposure shots of deep sky objects it's RAW files all the way!
Superb instructions, I am working my way through following your instructions after my first ever night imaging using AVI of a planet. Only issue is my image of Jupiter is so bright no detail can be seen, even at an ISO of 200 using prime focus. Should I use a moon filter next time? (Telescope: 127mm mak, Canon 1000D).
Yes, try out a lunar filter. Try out iso 100 and if you are able to adjust the shutter speed, do that as well to dim your target. Glad you found this helpful.
@@LateNightAstronomy thanks I will try that :D
great video, what telescope did you use for this
I took these pictures using the Orion XT8i dobsonian telescope.
Thank you very much for this tutorial. It helped me out.
I would like to ask if it is better to shoot in 4K 30fps than 1080p 60fps? Which one do you prefer for getting the best quality possible? Thank you. 😀
This is a great question. My gut would tell me to try out 4K 30fps just to test out that higher pixel count on the planet. Give both a try on the same night and go through the same processing techniques to see which worked best. Stop back by and let me know which wins.
very good tutorial, thank you
I appreciate that! Thanks for such a nice comment!
Hi Michael. How are you? Thank you for the great video.
I have read that Autostakkert can do all of the functions of PIPP & that PIPP is no longer needed - is that true, or do I lose quality by doing that?
I have a GoTo feature on my telescope. Am I better off locking on the planet with the GoTo while I make my video, or is it better to not track and just let the planet pass through the field of view?
Thanks again!
I'm doing great and am glad you found the video helpful. I have not read that about Autostakkert but hope it is true. Anything to simplify the process is a good thing. If you have a goto and it can track use that feature! You will be able to capture many more frames than me which could lead to much better results. Remember that there is a limit as to how much you can capture even with tracking due to the rotation of the planets. I believe the limit is typically 1 to 2 minutes but it varies from planet to planet. An internet search of that should provide you with some more accurate answers on planet rotation and imaging.
Very good video. I have tinkered with a friends NexImage camera and plan to try my DSLR. Curious...why do you try to focus on the passing Jupiter image, rather than just focus the whole train on a bright star to make it as small as possible when zoomed? Isn't focus for a particular optical train focused for all celestial objects?
Thank you for your comment! I have found it frustrating to center stars (even brighter ones) with the DSLR connected due to how dim they can be when they are slightly unfocused and how magnified they are with the Barlow Lens connected. You are correct that a very bright star like Vega would work just as well and probably even better at getting sharp focus before the imaging begins. Thanks for the suggestion and clear skies!
@@LateNightAstronomy Yes. Very dim until I crank the ISO up and shutter speed on live view. I sometimes use a magnifying glass to exam it in live view. I have marked the tube on my focuser tube with black sharpie at 25mm eyepiece and Nikon D5300 to get near focus fast. Shows up great on those silver Orion tubes even in the dark.
@@MrGp3po Excellent technique!
Thanks for that super tutorial! I would like to ask, Is there any way to correct atmospheric dispersion?
Good question. You can by atmospheric dispersion correctors for visual and imaging of planets. The effectiveness will vary but it may be something to look up and see if it interests you.
I'm learning so much from your channel, thank you! I'm new to this incredible field and I can't wait for clearer skies. What kind of eyepiece would you recommende me for observing Jupiter?
I appreciate your kind words. Check out this video I did on budget eyepieces for telescopes and let me know what you thing of some of the options I mention in the video. ruclips.net/video/8utkTFhDK5c/видео.html
What telescope you have?
@@LateNightAstronomy I will definitely check your video, thanks!
I have a dobson skywatcher 150p and I'm a little indecisive about buying a new eyepiece (I already have a 25mm and a 10mm that came with the telescope) or a barlow lens 2x!
Do you ever use darks, flats and darkflat frames or is that not possible when using video footage?
@@Dances_With_Skies I use those for deep sky imaging but not for planetary imaging. I don't believe they would be beneficial for how the planets are imaged and processed.
I fitted an extra finder scope so I have one for using optical and another for usb camera.
That's a great idea! Thanks for sharing!
@@LateNightAstronomy I made a small vid of it. I`m not the best utuber lol.
ruclips.net/video/gAxYaUxrCjQ/видео.html
2:20 Wow!
It looks so impressive with the digital zoom!
New subscriber. Question; between the Orion StarShoot 3mp Solar System V Imaging Camera
and the 1.3mp, which would you choose for imaging Jupiter. Telescope is Orion XT8 plus, seeing conditions usually moderate, sometimes good (minimal light polluted area).
Thanks for your support! Having not used either of them I would recommend going with the 3mp simply based off of reviews. Before you purchase that, have you ever tried connecting a cell phone adapter to your telescope to image the moon and planets. Check out this video I made to see how the process works. ruclips.net/video/C8EIyocVRJI/видео.html
@@LateNightAstronomy Thanks for taking time to reply, I'll get a phone holder to start.
Great simple tutorial thank you. I have an Orion xt8 too. I have no Barlow yet only 12mm bst eyepiece. I am thinking of buying a 3x Barlow but I will be using a phone to record for now. Do you think that's the right setup?
Does your phone have optical zoom? I would probably go with a 2x barlow lens at this point. Best for visual use and imaging with your current equipment.
Thanks so much again ! That really helps me a lot and I am going to try again tonight !!! what an awesome hobby
I couldn't agree more. Our hobby is the best! Thanks and let me know how your results turn out!
Hey. Great informative video, thank you for this! I have question, Jupiter is best when it’s zoomed 3x4 times with phone’s zoom. So it won’t be like a 45 second long video with my 80mm Powerseeker f/11 Refractor. It’s rather 4-5 second video, do you think it’ll be good enough as a 45 sec. video? Or do you have any advice like should I rather take as many photos I can and put them in the software? Cheers!
Good question. 4 to five seconds at 60 or 120fps can still give you some nice frames to work with. Give it a try and let me know how it goes.
Am I correct that you use the digital zoom only for adjusting focus? You don't say you turn it off for actual recording, but your video shows Jupiter in record is much smaller than when your fine tuning the focus.
I'm responding to the overall thread and not whoever that user is shown. I deleted it once thinking I hit reply on someone's comment. But it did it again.
Yes, my camera won't record with digital zoom on and I also don't suggest using it for any type of video or imaging with astronomy!
Up next: Saturn! :)
You read my mind. I hope to have a version of this out for Saturn later this month!
Excellent content
Much appreciated
Thank you for this video .
Can you please tell me what telescope you’re using and how you were able to get the image so large and clear
Does the magnification of the 3x Barlow depend on how the adjustable adaptor is set ( full in vs full out ? )
Thank you
Good question. The setup consist only of my telescope, a 3x barlow lens, canon adapter and my dslr camera. I try to shoot the planets when they are highest in the sky and conditions are very calm. That gives me a focal ration of roughly 3600mm for the scope I am using.
@@LateNightAstronomy thank you for your reply .
I have an Orion 8” diameter x 1000 mm focal length . My 2x Barlow did not make the image large enough - so I used eye piece projection with a 6mm eyepiece . From experimentation - the 6mm eye piece gives me a 9x magnification over prime . The image was still not as large as yours .
I’m missing something . Thank you for your help .
Can you make a video on how to take a timelapse of jupiter and its moons .
That is a great suggestion. I have had moderate success with doing that. If I figure out a way to do it without a telescope that tracks I'll put it in a future Jupiter video.
Hi, Great videos, what telescope do you use to get your images? I have a Celestron Astro Fi 5 its an SCT just under 5" with 1250 focal length, can I get the same kind of images attaching my Canon 1200D to it.
Thanks
Thanks so much. I use the Orion XT8i telescope. For the brighter planets, I bet you could get images that rival mine if the sky is clear and steady! Let me know if you have anymore questions!
typically fine video, thanks. A somewhat related question: is that the Bubble Nebula atop the page? I was just photographing it the other night, thinking it would be a nice blue color, and my images are all bright red. I wonder if it's a color calibration issue. Or is that a different nebula or star cluster?
Thanks so much for the compliment! The image at the top of my banner is the Orion Nebula. Is the bubble nebula itself red or the entire frame? Also, what do you use to image and process? My Deep Sky images used to have a heavy green tone to them due to my DSLR but once I started using PixInsight's background extraction and color calibration tools it took care of it.
Thanks for this wonderful video! Two questions: a) what eyepiece did you use with your telescope?; b) When I am trying to take movie using my Canon camera, 600D, I get over saturated image at 3200 ISO. I have experimented with different parameters but the situation did not improve much. I know I am stretching the limits of my 6" OTA. I will appreciate your advise.
Thanks very much! I don't use an eyepiece for this type of setup. Just the telescope, 3x barlow, T-ring Extendable Adapter and Camera. Try shooting at iso's below 3200 and if things are still too bright maybe try throwing a lunar filter on the barlow lens. My guess is though that an ISO around 400/800 or so should solve your problem.
@@LateNightAstronomy Thanks.
@@LateNightAstronomy Does ISO introduce a lot of noise? I end up using 100 or 200 and adjust the brightness with the exposure length.
@@christopherleveck6835 Are you shooing video of the planets. For video, I tend to find 800 good for Jupiter and 3200 good for Saturn. The noise after stacking the planets video frames can often be dealt with in Registax.
@@christopherleveck6835 It's a balancing act and can vary from camera to camera.
can i ask why you needed the extendable camera adapter ,,,would a fixed extender work the same ? i have a 10 inch dosonian and a canon 60d not tried this setup yet but your video is awesome.
Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. Without the extendable adapter I can't get proper focus for some reason. That may be different for certain telescopes and cameras, but for mine its the case!
@@LateNightAstronomy brill thank you
@@LateNightAstronomy i got the same extender as you thank you.
Thank you for the video. It was very helpful. I have tried to photograph Jupiter with the settings you suggested but the image is blown out and so there isn't very much detail. I am using a Canon Mark IV 5D attached to an 8" Celestron on a AVX mount. I am also using a 3x barlow lens. I am able to center and track Jupiter with no problem but the video image of Jupiter is more white than dark like yours. So, I used a lower ISO to darken it but I'm still not getting very many clear details. Should I try using a Bahtinov Focus Mask on Jupiter first in order to try to attain better focus?
Focus could be part of it. What is the focal length of your telescope? You also may want to try a 2x barlow lens.
@@LateNightAstronomy it is 1000mm.
@@iFindSermons Are you taking video or pictures of Jupiter? Also, you may want to check your shutter speed either way.
@@LateNightAstronomy I'm taking video. My shutter speed is 60.
@@iFindSermons That's intersting. If you'd like to share the picture with me to take a look at it feel free to email it to the email account listed in the about section of my youtube channel.
I have a Celestron 130EQ Astromaster telescope. Whenever I look at Jupiter I just see a bright ball of light with its moons surrounding it. I purchased a 6mm planetary viewing eyepiece, hopefully I can get a better view. Do you think this will change anything? Thanks for the video, really helped me out!
The 6mm eyepiece should give you about 108x magnification with your telescope. I get some great views of Jupiter at that magnification through my telescope. Let me know how the change looks once you get it!
Hi, do you have a electrical motor for your telescope? and which Telescope do you use? and haha do you have a coma corrector?
Good questions. I have the Orion XT8i. It is a manually push to telescope with no motors. I find the planets and let them float along the field of view to capture the images I take of them. I do not use a coma corrector but have read good things about them for fast scopes and visual observing.
Great video
Question
Some of my. Video’s don’t get centered after PIPP process
Make sure "Pkanetary" is checked and you also might need to adjust the "Object Detection Threshold" under Processing Options.
Hi. Great image. Unfortunately, all my laptop, computer, phone are Apple. I have nothing Windows whatsoever so I believe I cannot use Registax or Autostakkert etc. Do you know if there are any. mac equivalents?
I don' know that there are. Could you run "Boot Camp" on your mac to get them up and running?
@@LateNightAstronomy I'm hopeless trying to get anything set up on a computer which is not just download and set up/open. The idea of going into Bootcamp (I don't even know how it all works) fills me with dread and I've read even people who know this stuff come up with issues when using it. I'm zero skilled at debugging.
When you use the Astromania 1.25" Extendable Camera Adapter do you use a eye piece too. Its not stated and I guess you dont your using the tube to help to get to correct focal lenght or if you do use and I piece what power is it
I do not use an eyepiece with this setup.
Thank you for the reply, Im using a 2x barlow with my DSLR and can obtain focal distance and go to 5 or 10x to bring it it focus, but as soon as I hit record it drops out of 5 or 10x zoom and records as a small target and when viewed the file its small unless I zoom in and processing is the same, was wondering if its the 2x barlow causing the problem and should go with a 3x barlow.
Tnx agian
@@mikelarson1018 What telescope are you using?
@@LateNightAstronomy I finally thought it might be the telescope its
William Optics 73mm f/5.9 ZenithStar FPL53 Doublet APO Refractor Ive got an older Meade reflector Starfinder 10". Ive been try to get it set up on the Orion atlas II mount but just scope, rings and camera pushes it close to the 44 pound rating.
@@mikelarson1018 That is a very nice scope for deep sky imaging but the 430mm is going to be tough to use for planets! The images I end up with in this video were captured with a 1200mm focal length x 3x barlow lens. Effectively making it a 3600mm scope.
I'm about to try your process, but in previous attempts to image Jupiter it was just too over exposed, you make no mention of any filters used, if you did, can you elaborate please?
I did not se any filters with this setup. Try adjusting down the ISO or possibly after that using a lunar filter for its brightness. But in most cases taking video and adjusting the ISO should do the trick
🌸🌸🌸🌸
This might seem like sorta a dumb question but your tutorial is helping really nicely but my photos of jupiter are very small as i dont have a high magnification, of course when i zoom in on the photo it gets more blurry, is there some way to counteract the blurryness but still have a fairly good sized image? Or is that not possible
What size telescope are you shooting with. My initial answer to you is to buy a solid 2x or 3x barlow lens.
@@LateNightAstronomy a nextstar4se i thought that too but im already on the edge of my magnification so wont the barlow double it and exceed the max magnification?
Jupiter is back. Means one thing. I need to relearn to use Registax lol
Haha! Yes. I feel the same way every year!
Does the T-ring adapter work with all cameras? I have a Nikon D600.
The T-Ring Adapter I use is built for Canon DSLR cameras. Nikon versions are sold for a very similar price!
Can I get a usable result with a Skywatcher MAK90 and a Canon EOS 200D II . Thanks. Anantha
If you stack a 2x or 3x barlow onto that I bet you could get some nice results on a clear and steady night as long as your telescope could handle the weight of that setup.
Just a query, - you focused with 5x mag, why did you not also video record at 5x mag?
The 5x magnification is a digital zoom I use on the camera just for focusing. The camera can't record at 5x digital and I like to only record with optical zoom.
Wish I could image Jupiter... My telescope isn't able to make the bands out sadly so its not so interesting to look at as it's just a white circle. If you have any recommendations on how I could get the bands to appear please let me know I have been trying for a while now and have tried many solutions but wasn't successful. I have the Orion 10015 4.5 inch tabletop telescope!
Jupiter will be better positioned this Summer and Fall which should help. What evepiece are you using with that telesocpe?
@@LateNightAstronomy Lets hope! I was using a 17mm with my 2x barlow, and I also tried my 6mm alone and a 6x with my 2x barlow.