At the very last radio communications comming from the Estonia you can clearly hear water rushing in to the bridge. Now I understand how that came to be.
That creepy alarm all the time and then that metallic creak is so terrible. The bang at the end of the recording made me think that something had fallen over and smashed somewhere, but it could also be the water entering. I read somewhere that the high pressure and forces created by the flowing water alone could possibly be enough to be fatal. And then they probably capsized completely, upside down, in complete darkness, maybe hit their head and passed out, and then they drowned. A recording like a black box would have been so interesting and of course sad, we will never know whether they were aware of what might have just happened.
The estonia suffered complete blackout once it was on its side which makes comms unavailable. And during the last comms between estonia, the bridge was still not in contact with water.
@@ellipsis101 The pressure of the water entering the cabin was just... normal pressure unlike the titanic where the pressure could kill you because it actually fell down fast.
What is missing here is the deadweight of cars and semi trucks onboard and it’s cargo.. That would have slammed to the side of the ship making it’s list worse
The car ramp was never open like this, this is where I have a problem with the sinking like this. If the ramp was closed it should have taken much longer to actually sink
It's a fake Model, the ship sunken with closed ramp and closed Nose. The Sinking comes from the hole in the right hule side. The fist wather incoming registration was 2 decks under the Parking Deck.
One survivor stated the ramp was wide open right when the ship was about to plunge. When the ship went vertical as many states it did as it went down. Thats where the ramp could had possibly closed
This speculation is wrong, because no matter was the visor blown off or not, the ramp was fully closed in the first dive made by the Rockwater. There was a red mattress between the ramp and hinges to keep the biggest masses of water out. In the second recorded film that red mattress was removed.
Exactly, and two Estonians guys who survived said after the disaster that they, when the visor was gone, climbed down the backside of the ramp to reach the sea. This also tells us that the ramp was in place during the sinking and that the official explanation isn't true.
And after a recent dive, the visor is now completely open. I want to believe it was a tragedy and it wasn't a premeditated incident but there are WAY TOO MANY sinister facts and "coincidences" to make me believe it was just an accident
The ramp was fully open, there are clear marks on the bottom side from the impact with the fore peak. When the list exceeded 90 degrees, it was closed due to normal gravity.
So she sank this way only from taking in water on the car deck? Why didn't she capsize properly? Can unleashed cargo do this? Unsealed doors on the car deck? There are witnesses saying water was rushing in from below the car deck. A massive hole and an indent were found in the hull along the waterline, splitting between the car deck and the cabins below. Experts say it doesn't seem to be tension damage - rather impact damage. The ocean floor where she laid to rest is full of soft clay. No cliffs or stony hills to make an impact according to research. No wonder conspiracy theories boil up to the surface when there are so many questions unanswered. All we have is shitty journalists to explain things they don't understand when there are folks out there who actually know things, I'm sure.
Its true but there are just far too many cases about the ms estonia . Specially the one which raises suspisions is the murder of igor kristapovits who worked at the port when ms estonia sunk. So he most likely found out about the cargo because he was a costums officer . And some time after the conspiracy of weapon smuggling started igor kristapovits got shot 3 times in the head by unknown person..
The hole has to be the second place where water came in, together with the car deck, which leaded to rapid capsize and sinking at the same time. How the hole got there is a mystery. Collision with the loose bow visor in the water? Expert in the new documentary series from Discovery calculated that it must have been a very heavy object...
Soft clay near the bow and stern, hard rock in the middle.(close to where the three "new" holes in the hull are) The ship took in water below the water line via the air ducts on deck 4 to the engine room(decks 0 and 1). When the list was approx, 35 degrees, the vents came below the water line and ~300 tons of water per minute could flow into the engne room.
In Theory, why not. 10cm of water on Cardeck shifting to one side is inoff for the boat to list heavely, then there are Doors on Side of the Cardeck, if there open, water can rush down. But yeah, usually on Cardecks the Door to go up or down are in the Center/Middle Core if i remember rightly, if so, i dont know...
@@SdH76zhEU All passages up and down are in the middle from the cardeck and down according to deck plans. Some ferry's that have cardecks even higher up will have passages in the sides because water can't get up there, so that's probably where you're getting it from. There is a possibility for water to enter downwards at specific heeling angles, but the issue is that the ship wasn't in that position for a long enough duration. Somehow it lost it's buoyancy and the official report never goes into detail on how it happened. That's because the cause of the incident was already declared by Swedish PM Carl Bildt the same morning the ship was lost. Survivors hadn't even embarked their rescue vessels when it was declared that the visor was the culprit. And the media didn't even ask what his sources were; they just fed it to the public.
The vent needs to be there, you need it to simulate the air being compressed inside the real ship. A model ship does not behave like a real ship when it sinks due to water pressure and so on
This model doesn't make sense if there isn't a hole below the waterline. No other ferry in history has behaved like this without a hole, there are some similar disatsers with a hole in the history, for example a disatser with a Greek ship. On the contrary compare for example with the ferry Jan Heweliuz where there only was water on the cardeck and she flipped around and stayed afloat for days before sinking. M/s Estonia would have behaved in the same way if the official explanation was true! Politicians can do a lot but they can't change the laws of nature.
Really nice looking sinking video of a model:). But why there is that long antenna-like mast pointing from the chimney? It breaks up at the time 21:44. That kind of lever surely fucks up the whole demonstration of the actual sinking of Estonia, since it affects to the center of gravity of the whole system
I wonder, was the cardeck surface below the waterline.? If it was over waterline it would have emptied by itself of they they would have turned the rear against the waves. And shouldn't all doors between cardeck and rest of the boat have been closed automatically.?
Had she only had water entry from the bow then that would not explain the water that was already in the decks below. She should've floated capsized but was already flooded. Which to me suggests another entry point for water below her waterline. The hole recently found on her starboard side is the smoking gun.
Commenters out there. For those who love ship models, this is for you. Buy an Estonia model that has a bow visor opening feature. Put it in the water. It will probably float level. Now rip off the bow visor, and put it in the water. Water will start splashing and gushing into the small car deck. If you make waves with your water, the water in the model will start sloshing side to side, and the entire model will just… roll onto one side! Now, if you have toy vehicles in there, the cars will also move to that one side. And if the model’s opening goes below the water line, then the weight of the toy cars and the water will bring it to the bottom of your pool.
Scary situation. Probably a combination of the hole and broken visor sank the ship....however, I'm not sure why the the visor gave way as the captain said that the weather was nothing unusual...Could the visor have been damaged/repaired from a previous accident? It is often said that major disasters occur after a series of many factors...visor, hole, weather, submarine collision, military armaments, etc....Could the ferry have hit rocks or the bottom of the sea...even more scary, I undertsand that there were cabins BELOW the car deck! Reminds me of the Titanic, passengers struggling to get to the upper deck...
@@davidwittberg683 False! 'Fokus Estonia' has debunked that. There are witnesses on the first deck starboard side (right side where the hole is) who heard a loud metal-on-metal crashing sound. That is why TWENTY people survived on the first deck even though they had by far the farthest to go and most stairs to climb, because they saw water IMMIDETELY after the loud crashing sound on starboard side on the first floor and thus they knew FIRST that something was wrong.
@@Mere-Lachaiselongue Ofc you are correct, Elvis is alive, the moon landing is fake and jet fuel can't weaken metal beams, any more truths you wish to share?
Not that it was his decision, but at least the headline didn't read (the captain was the first off the ship) as is with a great many of these disaster's.
Jo ja 20 min kohdalla tulee ilmat pois styrbordin puolelta että se kallistuisi enemmän. Tuon ajoramppi historiaan en oikeen usko. Se oli pystyssä kun konemiehet tarkasti sen ennen uppomista ja se oli pystyssä pohjalla. Nyt se on siis ihan auki...Ei ollu auki 2020....
@@petriisoaho lisäksi jos hiukan katsoo kuvia visiirin rakenteesta ja merestä nostetusta visiiristä niin ihmetyttää miten visiirin hydraulisylinterit ovat visiirissä kiinni ja toinen täydessä mitassaan. Sylinterit ovat pituudeltaan kahden kansivälin korkuisia ja koteloitu niin että niiden on ollut pakko nousta kotelostaan ylöspäin. Eli visiiri ei ole voinut vain kaatua eteenpäin kuten animaatioissa näytetään. Sen on pitänyt nousta kahden kannen korkeuden verran ja silloin visiirin ramppikotelo ei enää selitä rampin avautumista. Myöskin kahden kannenmitan verran korkeammalle noussut visiiri on ollut pakko näkyä komentosillalle
@@Cognizant-ut9oj The pumps only worked on deck one (two floors beneath the parking deck) and they were put on immediately because water was found on deck one before the parking deck. Survivors on deck one recall there being water immediately after a loud metal-to-metal crashing sound was heard on starboard side. See 'Fokus Estonia' for proof.
@@Mere-Lachaiselongue The MS Estonia was in an eviroment that she never was bild for and in a bad condition. Not a single pump system in the the world can withstand an open car deck and an big crack in the Hull.
The sound of a bow visor twisting and getting ripped of? Sounds like metal to me. And a monstrous ramp dropping on the förpiksbulb. Metal-To-Metal? I get that you believe in your theories. I believed that the official story was bs for many years and researched all strange theories i could find. After Evertssons docu i focused on researching and checking the official explanation and i have no doubts anymore. All the hard evidence is there. It makes sense. There are no holes there. I dont know why you advertised 200 times for Fokus Estonia in this comment section saying the same things over and over again, avid fan of that channel i guess. Watch Estoniaveckan instead people. He fact checks all kind of theories in his videos and uses evidence, logic and science in his testing. Great channel.
Something is so strange about estonia.. Really really strange.. I can bet my life that it was not just an ordinary "accident".. Smells coverup all the way
There is needed an explanation why Estonia lie down on the starboard-side if the water was pouring in from the bow. Estonia should either went upsidedown or sinking straight up because the weight from the water from the bow should have made a stability inside the ship. If you read about missiled ships from second world war (wilhelm gustloff as an example) all ships sank the same way as Estonia. They lie down on the same side the hole was and sank quickly. Estonia must have had a hole on starboard-side when she sank. Another strange thing is that i have not found another ship that has lost its bow visor. I have heard of damages on other bow visors but the way Estonias bow visor fell off seem to be unique.
Why do they shift to underwater camera then the most importat part should be filmed from above .. they dont want us to see the air valve hidden in the underside of the hull let the the air out so she could sink ..
Hallo..... Fakt und Tatsache ist das die ESTONIA versenkt wurde und zwar durch zwei Sprengungen d.h. im Bereich Maschinenraum und Vorschiff ! , das beweist die Sinkgeschwindigkeit sowie die Tatsache das wäre Wasser auf das Hauptdeck gelangt wäre sie durchgekentert und nicht kentert . Beim durchkentern hätte sie noch mindestens 72 Stunden kieloben treiben müssen ! . Ich lese und höre seit fast 30 Jahren nur dauernd den Namen ESTONIA.... wenn man ordentlich recherchiert dann stellt man fest das die ESTONIA das Meisterstück quasi war und das Gesellenstück war nachweislich die JAN HEWELIUSZH welche ebenso versenkt wurde ! . Das die ESTONIA ihr Bugvisier beim Untergang am Rumpf hatte beweist die Tatsache das es Sonarbilder gibt die deutlich zeigen das das Bugvisier auf der ESTONIA d.h. auf der BB-Seite liegt ! . Wäre die ESTONIA wirklich so gesunken wie es von offizieller Seite behauptet wird dann hätten mehr Menschen gerettet werden können und ich empfehle sehr sich das Mayday hier auf RUclips anzuhören d.h., nur widerwillig wird eine Position bekannt gegeben und diese ist fast 30sm von Utö entfernt . Das selbige im Fall JAN HEWELIUSZH wo ebenfalls sehr widerwillig eine Position genannt wird beim Mayday .
There a hole in her side the survivors that worked on her said water rushed into her mid compartments not the visors there's also a submarine wreck ot to far from her with red blue and red paint on its bow. They think it hit the Estonia
Playing this in 1.75x makes it look hauntingly realistic. Like the speed and movement of the waves and the overall swinging.
Thanks for suggestion
1.5 better i think
At the very last radio communications comming from the Estonia you can clearly hear water rushing in to the bridge. Now I understand how that came to be.
That creepy alarm all the time and then that metallic creak is so terrible. The bang at the end of the recording made me think that something had fallen over and smashed somewhere, but it could also be the water entering. I read somewhere that the high pressure and forces created by the flowing water alone could possibly be enough to be fatal. And then they probably capsized completely, upside down, in complete darkness, maybe hit their head and passed out, and then they drowned. A recording like a black box would have been so interesting and of course sad, we will never know whether they were aware of what might have just happened.
The estonia suffered complete blackout once it was on its side which makes comms unavailable. And during the last comms between estonia, the bridge was still not in contact with water.
Imagine being on the ship while the blackout and the waves smashing the windows to enter the ship
@@ellipsis101 The pressure of the water entering the cabin was just... normal pressure unlike the titanic where the pressure could kill you because it actually fell down fast.
What is missing here is the deadweight of cars and semi trucks onboard and it’s cargo.. That would have slammed to the side of the ship making it’s list worse
That weight would actually be negligible.
@@robbieglass4905 How so?
The car ramp was never open like this, this is where I have a problem with the sinking like this. If the ramp was closed it should have taken much longer to actually sink
It's a fake Model, the ship sunken with closed ramp and closed Nose. The Sinking comes from the hole in the right hule side. The fist wather incoming registration was 2 decks under the Parking Deck.
One survivor stated the ramp was wide open right when the ship was about to plunge. When the ship went vertical as many states it did as it went down. Thats where the ramp could had possibly closed
@@Nomannium probably delusional, check the actual wreck record and notice the position of the ramp.
We dont know that
@@thedevilneveraskstwice7027 the actual wreck was upside down tho?
its almost scary that we today can either recreate or even anticipate how a ship will/did sink in small scale for research....
Sad part is 😢 the government left all the bodies in the ship 🛳
@@_Tony_87 yes, she took 852 souls with her
@@_Tony_87 Sad part is people believe the official story despite it being horribly flawed.
Well, it seems how Estonia sinks on a politically correkt way
The fact the this is nearly accurate to the real sinking gives the chills
This speculation is wrong, because no matter was the visor blown off or not, the ramp was fully closed in the first dive made by the Rockwater. There was a red mattress between the ramp and hinges to keep the biggest masses of water out. In the second recorded film that red mattress was removed.
Exactly, and two Estonians guys who survived said after the disaster that they, when the visor was gone, climbed down the backside of the ramp to reach the sea. This also tells us that the ramp was in place during the sinking and that the official explanation isn't true.
And after a recent dive, the visor is now completely open.
I want to believe it was a tragedy and it wasn't a premeditated incident but there are WAY TOO MANY sinister facts and "coincidences" to make me believe it was just an accident
The ramp could have closed again during the way down to the bottom, since the ship turned upside down.
That's a fake model. It sunks from the hole in the right hule side.
The ramp was fully open, there are clear marks on the bottom side from the impact with the fore peak. When the list exceeded 90 degrees, it was closed due to normal gravity.
So she sank this way only from taking in water on the car deck? Why didn't she capsize properly? Can unleashed cargo do this?
Unsealed doors on the car deck?
There are witnesses saying water was rushing in from below the car deck.
A massive hole and an indent were found in the hull along the waterline, splitting between the car deck and the cabins below.
Experts say it doesn't seem to be tension damage - rather impact damage.
The ocean floor where she laid to rest is full of soft clay. No cliffs or stony hills to make an impact according to research.
No wonder conspiracy theories boil up to the surface when there are so many questions unanswered.
All we have is shitty journalists to explain things they don't understand when there are folks out there who actually know things, I'm sure.
Its true but there are just far too many cases about the ms estonia . Specially the one which raises suspisions is the murder of igor kristapovits who worked at the port when ms estonia sunk. So he most likely found out about the cargo because he was a costums officer . And some time after the conspiracy of weapon smuggling started igor kristapovits got shot 3 times in the head by unknown person..
The hole has to be the second place where water came in, together with the car deck, which leaded to rapid capsize and sinking at the same time. How the hole got there is a mystery. Collision with the loose bow visor in the water? Expert in the new documentary series from Discovery calculated that it must have been a very heavy object...
How coud the holes be made when she hit the seafloor upside down?
That's a fake model. The Ramp was colsed and the nose was in closed position. She sink from the big hole in the right side of her hule.
Soft clay near the bow and stern, hard rock in the middle.(close to where the three "new" holes in the hull are)
The ship took in water below the water line via the air ducts on deck 4 to the engine room(decks 0 and 1). When the list was approx, 35 degrees, the vents came below the water line and ~300 tons of water per minute could flow into the engne room.
This floats far longer than Estonia did.
Estonia took 30 minutes to sink, I do not think so
Ah did the Estonia also have a convenient vent below waterline to allow air to go out just like this model?
In Theory, why not. 10cm of water on Cardeck shifting to one side is inoff for the boat to list heavely, then there are Doors on Side of the Cardeck, if there open, water can rush down. But yeah, usually on Cardecks the Door to go up or down are in the Center/Middle Core if i remember rightly, if so, i dont know...
@@SdH76zhEU All passages up and down are in the middle from the cardeck and down according to deck plans. Some ferry's that have cardecks even higher up will have passages in the sides because water can't get up there, so that's probably where you're getting it from. There is a possibility for water to enter downwards at specific heeling angles, but the issue is that the ship wasn't in that position for a long enough duration. Somehow it lost it's buoyancy and the official report never goes into detail on how it happened. That's because the cause of the incident was already declared by Swedish PM Carl Bildt the same morning the ship was lost. Survivors hadn't even embarked their rescue vessels when it was declared that the visor was the culprit. And the media didn't even ask what his sources were; they just fed it to the public.
The vent needs to be there, you need it to simulate the air being compressed inside the real ship. A model ship does not behave like a real ship when it sinks due to water pressure and so on
@@Estoniaveckan Then why do a model test?
@@norbertmayer7005 to confirm the theories?
This model doesn't make sense if there isn't a hole below the waterline. No other ferry in history has behaved like this without a hole, there are some similar disatsers with a hole in the history, for example a disatser with a Greek ship. On the contrary compare for example with the ferry Jan Heweliuz where there only was water on the cardeck and she flipped around and stayed afloat for days before sinking. M/s Estonia would have behaved in the same way if the official explanation was true! Politicians can do a lot but they can't change the laws of nature.
Whilst I agree there’s more to this story, the herald of free enterprise sunk similarly. Albeit in different conditions
How can the model not make sense?? Lol.. the whole point in the model is it provides proof.
It was a heavy storm and the cars being placed in a way that made the ship off balanced didn't really help its case
I'm sorry dude but if it was a big hole in the ship at the time of the sinking she would have sunk much faster.
Really nice looking sinking video of a model:). But why there is that long antenna-like mast pointing from the chimney? It breaks up at the time 21:44. That kind of lever surely fucks up the whole demonstration of the actual sinking of Estonia, since it affects to the center of gravity of the whole system
I can imagine generators and other machinery trying operate upside down, until they ran dry.
I wonder, was the cardeck surface below the waterline.? If it was over waterline it would have emptied by itself of they they would have turned the rear against the waves. And shouldn't all doors between cardeck and rest of the boat have been closed automatically.?
Mistä materialiista toi o n tehty
Very interesting! 😊👌✌
Вроде - моделька , а всё равно - жутко .
Если там такой крен был ...
Бедные пассажиры ...
Had she only had water entry from the bow then that would not explain the water that was already in the decks below. She should've floated capsized but was already flooded. Which to me suggests another entry point for water below her waterline. The hole recently found on her starboard side is the smoking gun.
But possibly what happened was that when the visor broke off, it hit the starboard side, creating the hole.
@@guedezzz2362 I think the investigation that the new documentary made showed that to be unlikely. However, not implausible.
What is the old expected sinking time vs new time? I remember it being 12min
@@guedezzz2362 See 'Fokus Estonia', they have been filtered a lot so their videos ain't getting rec mmend to people.
I remember the audio being alot better.
awesome!
can i use a part in my video?
Estonia video comming soon
@@potaxie. 🤫
@@xmarcosnavigator New Estonia video
No problem. 😊
Commenters out there. For those who love ship models, this is for you. Buy an Estonia model that has a bow visor opening feature. Put it in the water. It will probably float level. Now rip off the bow visor, and put it in the water. Water will start splashing and gushing into the small car deck. If you make waves with your water, the water in the model will start sloshing side to side, and the entire model will just… roll onto one side! Now, if you have toy vehicles in there, the cars will also move to that one side. And if the model’s opening goes below the water line, then the weight of the toy cars and the water will bring it to the bottom of your pool.
This has the same audio recording as an old 5$ Chinese phone
That’s because it was filmed in the mid 1990s in a post-Soviet state
Scary situation. Probably a combination of the hole and broken visor sank the ship....however, I'm not sure why the the visor gave way as the captain said that the weather was nothing unusual...Could the visor have been damaged/repaired from a previous accident? It is often said that major disasters occur after a series of many factors...visor, hole, weather, submarine collision, military armaments, etc....Could the ferry have hit rocks or the bottom of the sea...even more scary, I undertsand that there were cabins BELOW the car deck! Reminds me of the Titanic, passengers struggling to get to the upper deck...
my theory is that the visor was in disrepair after encountering many storms before and that's why it broke away
The hole is from weight stress and came about as it sank or there after. Similar to how Tintanic snapped in two.
@@davidwittberg683 False! 'Fokus Estonia' has debunked that. There are witnesses on the first deck starboard side (right side where the hole is) who heard a loud metal-on-metal crashing sound. That is why TWENTY people survived on the first deck even though they had by far the farthest to go and most stairs to climb, because they saw water IMMIDETELY after the loud crashing sound on starboard side on the first floor and thus they knew FIRST that something was wrong.
@@Mere-Lachaiselongue Ofc you are correct, Elvis is alive, the moon landing is fake and jet fuel can't weaken metal beams, any more truths you wish to share?
Such asmr sound
very cool this model
Beutiful Estonia model
Can someone tell something about the scale ?? Thx a lot !!!!👍✌️🤞🍀 PS: 1 : 100 ??
1:1 scale
@@germanfisch 👍🤝🤪
"A scale model of MV Estonia with a scale factor of 1:40 was used for these tests."
Wheres the sub?
Not that it was his decision, but at least the headline didn't read (the captain was the first off the ship) as is with a great many of these disaster's.
31min kohdilla nypätään mallin pohjasta tulppa irti, siksi kuvattu alapuolelta
Jo ja 20 min kohdalla tulee ilmat pois styrbordin puolelta että se kallistuisi enemmän. Tuon ajoramppi historiaan en oikeen usko. Se oli pystyssä kun konemiehet tarkasti sen ennen uppomista ja se oli pystyssä pohjalla. Nyt se on siis ihan auki...Ei ollu auki 2020....
@@petriisoaho lisäksi jos hiukan katsoo kuvia visiirin rakenteesta ja merestä nostetusta visiiristä niin ihmetyttää miten visiirin hydraulisylinterit ovat visiirissä kiinni ja toinen täydessä mitassaan. Sylinterit ovat pituudeltaan kahden kansivälin korkuisia ja koteloitu niin että niiden on ollut pakko nousta kotelostaan ylöspäin. Eli visiiri ei ole voinut vain kaatua eteenpäin kuten animaatioissa näytetään. Sen on pitänyt nousta kahden kannen korkeuden verran ja silloin visiirin ramppikotelo ei enää selitä rampin avautumista. Myöskin kahden kannenmitan verran korkeammalle noussut visiiri on ollut pakko näkyä komentosillalle
They should do a model test sinking Simulation of the titanic
The movie is literally one.
Without bomb total unrealistic.... :)
LOL
@@magnuslarsson5242 I bet you feel dumb now two years later when it's been confirmed there were one or more detonations. See 'Fokus Estonia'
The car deck ramp was closed when ship sank!!! This is fake
The ramp could have closed on the way down to the bottom, since the ship turned upside down.
@@Edvinaronson That is what happened yes, but it's not sufficient for the quick sinking of the ship. 'Fokus Estonia' has confirmed it in their videos.
Subscribed
😀
What a fucking animation
If in car deck would have been valves to get water out, nothing was not happening except free car wash.
Nonsense
@@Cognizant-ut9oj The pumps only worked on deck one (two floors beneath the parking deck) and they were put on immediately because water was found on deck one before the parking deck.
Survivors on deck one recall there being water immediately after a loud metal-to-metal crashing sound was heard on starboard side.
See 'Fokus Estonia' for proof.
@@Mere-Lachaiselongue The MS Estonia was in an eviroment that she never was bild for and in a bad condition. Not a single pump system in the the world can withstand an open car deck and an big crack in the Hull.
The sound of a bow visor twisting and getting ripped of? Sounds like metal to me. And a monstrous ramp dropping on the förpiksbulb. Metal-To-Metal?
I get that you believe in your theories. I believed that the official story was bs for many years and researched all strange theories i could find. After Evertssons docu i focused on researching and checking the official explanation and i have no doubts anymore. All the hard evidence is there. It makes sense. There are no holes there.
I dont know why you advertised 200 times for Fokus Estonia in this comment section saying the same things over and over again, avid fan of that channel i guess.
Watch Estoniaveckan instead people. He fact checks all kind of theories in his videos and uses evidence, logic and science in his testing. Great channel.
Where did you get the model from?
From the government?!
Something is so strange about estonia.. Really really strange.. I can bet my life that it was not just an ordinary "accident".. Smells coverup all the way
Every accident seem to have their share of conspiracy theories. It’s almost like no accidents ever happens.
@@ghostviggen dont you think there are to many strange things surrounding the "accident"?
@@mrGW No
@@magnuslarsson5242 yes.. I does
@@mrGW it is strange, but i wouldn't go out of my way to say a submarine encountered and struck the estonia's visor during an emergency surface
А из чего он сделан
No entiendo mucho 💘pero parece una gran calamidad €🔪🪓🗡o un móvil 📱 o unas puertas abiertas 🧿pobre gente
There is needed an explanation why Estonia lie down on the starboard-side if the water was pouring in from the bow. Estonia should either went upsidedown or sinking straight up because the weight from the water from the bow should have made a stability inside the ship. If you read about missiled ships from second world war (wilhelm gustloff as an example) all ships sank the same way as Estonia. They lie down on the same side the hole was and sank quickly. Estonia must have had a hole on starboard-side when she sank.
Another strange thing is that i have not found another ship that has lost its bow visor. I have heard of damages on other bow visors but the way Estonias bow visor fell off seem to be unique.
не хочет тонуть то модель! ))
Она не железная
Can i buy this ship
Is this a VHS tape?
RUclips.
Why do they shift to underwater camera then the most importat part should be filmed from above .. they dont want us to see the air valve hidden in the underside of the hull let the the air out so she could sink ..
Hallo.....
Fakt und Tatsache ist das die ESTONIA versenkt wurde und zwar durch zwei Sprengungen d.h. im Bereich Maschinenraum und Vorschiff ! , das beweist die Sinkgeschwindigkeit sowie die Tatsache das wäre Wasser auf das Hauptdeck gelangt wäre sie durchgekentert und nicht kentert . Beim durchkentern hätte sie noch mindestens 72 Stunden kieloben treiben müssen ! .
Ich lese und höre seit fast 30 Jahren nur dauernd den Namen ESTONIA.... wenn man ordentlich recherchiert dann stellt man fest das die ESTONIA das Meisterstück quasi war und das Gesellenstück war nachweislich die JAN HEWELIUSZH welche ebenso versenkt wurde ! .
Das die ESTONIA ihr Bugvisier beim Untergang am Rumpf hatte beweist die Tatsache das es Sonarbilder gibt die deutlich zeigen das das Bugvisier auf der ESTONIA d.h. auf der BB-Seite liegt ! .
Wäre die ESTONIA wirklich so gesunken wie es von offizieller Seite behauptet wird dann hätten mehr Menschen gerettet werden können und ich empfehle sehr sich das Mayday hier auf RUclips anzuhören d.h., nur widerwillig wird eine Position bekannt gegeben und diese ist fast 30sm von Utö entfernt . Das selbige im Fall JAN HEWELIUSZH wo ebenfalls sehr widerwillig eine Position genannt wird beim Mayday .
There a hole in her side the survivors that worked on her said water rushed into her mid compartments not the visors there's also a submarine wreck ot to far from her with red blue and red paint on its bow. They think it hit the Estonia
Where have you seen the sub wreck near by?
would be nice to see this Simulation be repeated but with the new evidence "hole" there aswell. And compare the 2 of how long it takes for it to sink.
The crack came about after the ship already began to sink from the stress of the weight. Titanic even snapped in two.
@@davidwittberg683 yes but i mean it cracked on the stormy sea and then cracked even more on the bottom
@@CreativeHuckleBerry Don't listen to him, what he said was already debunked when he wrote that comment. See 'Fokus Estonia' for proof.
submarine
Terrifying
Seawater destroyed a car so why not it also perished the humans.
🌹🚢
Rofl
Terrible 😢
Not even close
Google.com