@@anonimosd.2872 I agree, but there are pieces of vital information left out that could have easily been included to make the movies make more sense as a stand-alone project. For example, the origin of the Marauders’ Map would explain how Professor Lupin knows how to use it, and yet it was omitted anyway. For me, the problem isn’t the lack of book parallels. It’s the tactless omission of information crucial to the story.
I've never in my 20 years of being a harry potter fan saw better reactions to the movies, you pay so much attention to the details, I never want your reactions to end but at the same time I can't wait for you to watch the last one 😂
@loveyousomuchdear Hi there! It`s always challenging to find good reaction channels. I loved the HP reactions on the following channels: - Rob & Trin react - The Dork Side TV - The Cocoa Couch and two more eccentric ones: - Veggie Gamer - Sincerely, K.S.O. Maybe you don`t know them yet and will like one or two of these :)
@@lechat8533 hi same here l also loved all the reaction chann you mentioned ,l found those while looking Harry Potter reactions as l am a big fan of the books and the films
5:06 The wand chooses the wizard, which is why Harry had the brother wand. He chose Lucius’ wand as a power move. To put Lucius further in “his place”.
41:29 The scene where Grindelwald is stealing the wand was decades before Harry Potter takes place, 35:58 the young man jumping from the window and the old man Voldemort was talking to are the same person, Gellert Grindelwald.
I work as a nanny & I helped one of my young charges do a school report about the wand lore of Harry Potter. The books & the official HP website were the only sources used for the report & we scoured all of them for every tidbit about wands. Most magical youngsters get their first wand when they start secondary school at 11-12 years old. The WAND chooses the wizard, as Olivander stated in the first book/movie & though a witch/wizard can use any wand they get the absolute best results with a wand that is loyal to them. A wand’s loyalty is gained in a couple of ways. The wand choosing its master is the most common way to get its loyalty. Ron & Neville were using hand-me-down wands in the first few movies. Ron was using his brother Charlie’s old wand & Neville had his father’s. That’s why they struggled with casting spells. They were using wands that were not loyal to them & didn’t recognize them as their true masters & were reluctant to serve them. Once they got new wands that chose them Ron & Neville’s magic improved significantly. The second way of gaining a wand’s loyalty is defeating the wands master through stealth or fighting. If you defeat another witch/wizard by outsmarting them (stealth) or defeating them in a fight their wand will switch its allegiance to you since you’ve proven you are better or stronger. Intent is important. In the 5th movie when the kids were practicing disarming in the Room of Requirement they didn’t lose the loyalty of their wands if they were disarmed since they weren’t truly fighting each other & the person who disarmed them wasn’t trying to defeat them. Dumbledore won the loyalty of the Elder Wand in a duel against the Dark Wizard Grindelwald. Grindelwald won it by stealing it from the wand maker Gregorovitch. It is customary to bury a witch/wizard with their wand. Most magical people never lose the loyalty of their wand & when they die the wands power is “broken” since their true master is gone. They will not work properly for anyone else so they are buried with their master. Badly damaged wands are nearly impossible to repair as we saw in Chamber of Secrets when Ron snapped the end off his brother’s old wand. He tried to repair it but couldn’t so he wrapped tape around it. As we saw the wand didn’t work properly. It backfired, shot sparks at odd times & sometimes didn’t work at all. That’s why he got a new one in the summer before third year. His new wand chose him & was loyal to him so Ron’s magic improved. Wands & their masters have a symbiotic relationship. They are bonded with each other & learn together & from each other. A wand that’s good for Transfiguration will help its owner quickly learn how to transfigure. A wand whose properties lend it toward performing charms will help its owner master the skill. A wizard who prefers the Dark Arts will bend his wand into performing powerful curses. The relationship between wand & owner is very much a partnership/marriage. I wish the movies had had time to explain the complex dynamics between the two since it’s so important to the overall story.
Not all wands will switch allegiance, usually dragon heartstring wands are the most likely to. A unicorn one for example will never change allegiance, at least while they still live, which is why Neville could never master his fathers.
A wand’s flexibly is more important than the core in forming allegiance. Bellatrix’s wand has a dragon heartstring core but Ollivander describes it as rigid. It did not change loyalty when Bellatrix was disarmed at Malfoy Manor. Draco’s wand had a unicorn hair core & Ollivander said it was reasonably pliant. It changed allegiance. Not saying anything more about it at this point.
Splinching is when you don't move the entirety of your body from one place to the destination in exactly the right proximity to itself. Basically part of your body teleports an inch away from the rest of it, resulting in an injury like Ron gets. It can actually be a lot worse though. Wizards have left whole parts of themselves at the start location.
For your wand questions at the beginning: The wand chooses the wizard, Harry got his wand because it chose him. You can use other people’s wands but they won’t work as well. Voldemort chooses Lucius’s wand as punishment for his failings mainly regarding his failure of getting the prophecy, because now Lucius doesn’t have a wand and even if he finds another one it won’t work as well. Dragon Heartstring is a powerful wand core so Voldemorts disgust at the wand is more likely do to his disgust at Lucius.
Love that you remembered that little detail in the streets about the poster for Fenrir Greyback. Fenrir is also the werewolf who attacked Remus Lupin when he was only a child and turned him into a werewolf. *sniffles* Unfortunately,, yes, that was Avada Kedavra on Hedwig :( Any time a spell fires off green in this movie, it is the killing curse :( In the book, it does a better job of explaining the reasoning of the fight in the beginning. They all figured that the Death Eaters would assume that Harry would be the one with the most powerful wizard, so that is why they went after Moody first as he's a powerful and very well respected Auror. Oh, and the Death Eater that curses off George's ear -- -- it was Snape. If you remember at the beginning of Half-Blood Prince, Horus Slughorn says his condolences towards Harry for his Godfather's death and shows Harry a picture with Regulus in it, saying that he had taught the whole Black family...all except Sirius. So that was a name drop quite early on. And on the matter of House Elves..I am not sure if you can order around just any house elf, though Harry was able to do it to Kreacher, because he belongs to the Black family, and when Sirius died, he passed the house down to Harry, so Kreacher came with it. I wish they would have included in the movies the character growth of Kreacher...he really had a nice redemption arc in the books. Polyjuice does still take that long to make - the movies don't really make the time spent hunting down the Horcruxes as well...they were really camping out and getting information for *months*! But you don't really feel that time gone. Also there are ways of doing spells without saying the words for the spell - like in the battle in The Order of the Phoenix, all you see in the Order vs DeathEater battle is wizards just whipping their wands around, silent for the most part. The ability to perform wordless magic is definitely much more advanced technique.
Fenrir Greyback was not only a notoriously savage werewolf who liked to place himself near children before he "turned," but he is the werewolf who purposely bit Remus Lupin just before Remus turned 5 years old.
The Elder Wand was stolen from the Gregorovitch the wand maker by young Gellert Grindelwald sometime in the early 1900’s. That was shown in the scene of the young man jumping out of the window with the wand in his hand. It’s unknown how Gregorovitch got the wand. Grindelwald was the Voldemort of the late 1930’s through the mid 1940’s. Dumbledore defeated Grindelwald in a duel in 1945 & won the Elder Wand from him. Grindelwald was imprisoned in a fortress & that’s where Voldemort questioned him about the wand in 1998. Voldemort kiIIed Grindelwald after learning the whereabouts of the Elder Wand.
Wow you’re so observant 🤩 Some of the potholes you’ve noticed and questions you had are actually explained in the book. For example, Hermione stole the rest of Mad Eye’s stock of polyjuice potion. Also in HBP, as 6th years they learn non-verbal spells and Apparition. Hermione earned her license to Apparate, Ron just failed the exam because he left part of an eyebrow behind, and Harry CAN Apparate but as he didn’t turn 17 before the end of the school year, so he couldn’t take the test at Hogwarts.
Hallows vs Horcruxes. Voldy only knew about horcruxes. He didn't know about the Hallows, he didn't know about wandlore, how wands worked. He thought the Elder Wand would make him undefeatable.
Unpacking "The Tale of the Three Brothers" The story goes back more than a thousand years, from before Hogwarts was founded. Back then, few people were literate, so oral history had to pass down information. Some oral history was in song, some in poetic verse, some in storytelling. "The Tale of the Three Brothers" was storytelling. To make stories easier to remember, they needed to be exciting, so the facts tended to get 'embellished'. There was never an anthropomorphized entity of 'Death' bearing tricky gifts. The artifacts were created by the Brothers Peverell themselves. Antioch created the Elder Wand. Problem was, his pride and arrogance got the better of him. Instead of keeping it quiet that he owned such a powerful item, he flashed it around and was robbed of it. Likely he was killed to keep him from coming after the thief. The Wand passed through many hands over the ages, eventually coming to Grigorovich the Wandmaker, then stolen by Gellert Grindelwald, lost in a 3way duel to Albus Dumbledore who disarmed him, then Draco disarmed Dumbledore and Draco became its true master without even knowing it. Its loyalty can only be acquired by disarming Draco of a wand. Cadmus created the badly-named 'Resurrection' Stone. The Stone DOES NOT bring people back to corporeal life; it's only power is to summon and hold captive the spirits of those who have died. The longer they are held, the more they suffer. But they cannot return to life; they do not 'resurrect' in the sense we understand. It passed from person to person before coming into the possession of Salazar Slytherin. When he died, it became a family heirloom, eventually passing down through the Gaunt family. Ton Riddle Jr's mother was a Gaunt, and when she died, he inherited it set as a stone in a ring. Tom eventually turned the ring and Stone into a horcrux, which Dumbledore was able to destroy at personal price (remember the black color of his hand?) while maintaining the power Cadmus had invested in the Stone to summon and capture spirits. Ignotus created the Cloak of Invisibility, the only one ever made that retains its ability make the wearer invisible. All others either fully fail or must be 'recharged'. As the story says, it was passed down to the eldest son (or, if no son, the eldest daughter) over the ages. Eventually James Potter received it from his mother and was inherited by Harry. Hermione found the grave of Ignotus Peverell under a dusting of snow in the graveyard at Godric's Hollow on Christmas Eve. As far as having all three artifacts make one 'master of death', that's pure nonsense; there is no evidence of that. It's misdirection, a red herring.
The "problem" with the spells is that you have to put a meaning into the incantation and its mostly based in latin for the english spells. So mostly the incantation describes the effect like for example "protego" to errect a shield in front of you. "Expecto patronum" means "I await a guardian." and so on.
Dobby's death hits me every time. He was so endearing. I am so excited to see your reaction to the finale where there are so many unexpected revelations and so many storylines that come together in one glorious, stressful, emotional rollercoaster of a film!! I promise that you will be satisfied in the end that you took this long trip, despite the pain and loss!!
also bathilda bagshot isnt a muggle she wrote the history of magic (one of the school books) and nagini (voldemorts snake) took her shape as voldemort knew she was close to the dumbledores so assumed to have nagini stay there incase harry showed up
I really wish they had put more information about the house and Kreacher in this movie. Harry, Herminie, and Ron a lot of time there and there's a lot of information about Kreacher that shows his arch and is very important in this book.
In the books there was a painting of Serius Black’s mum who hated the fact that Harry and Hermione were in her house 😂😂😂 Kreacher followed her footsteps on hating muggles that is why he was so rude to Hermione
Hermione thought Harry tasted better than Crabbe and Goyle. BTW, she took the Polyjuice Potion most number of times of the three. She developed an addiction, said it was for research. It was Moody's supply of Polyjuice Potion. They did not cook it up.
Snapey Poo taught them non verbal spells in The Half Baked Prince. The Fool Director didn't show it. So you don't utter the spell out loud, so your enemy will know. Hermione was expert at it. The rest had expressions of U No Poo while practicing it.
Remember in the first movie when Harry had to get a wand the first 2 wands blew up everything and the last one shone and chose him, and he was told funny that wand should choose you when it's brother gave you that scar? Also in this movie when the wand Voldemort took from Lucius cracked and blew when he tried to use it. The wand has to chose you as well to answer your queries
I have to say, to go from another channel just starting on the first film and then straight onto this in one sitting, as I'm doing now - the tonal change is just...! 🤯
Absolutely love your reactions. When you got emotional over Dumbledore, I was wondering how you'd manage this one. To this day. Dobby's death hurts me. You're one of the best reactors. I get immersed too so you're not alone. You're nice, keep going. ❤
About Petrificus Totalis, in one of the books, they actually start learning how to do spells without words. I think saying the words is supposed to be a help in focusing the magic--more experienced wizards don't always need to say them.
In the book Harry at the wedding was under the influence of polyjuice potion in the form of a red haired muggle from town that had a hair taken by George and/or Fred. (So he was playing at being a nonexistant Weasley relative)
The deal with the mirror is this: In Harry's 5th year (order of the phoenix) Sirius gave it to him. It was part of a pair of mirrors (small enough to fit in your pocket) that Sirius and James had created during their time at Hogwarts so they could communicate with each other when they would get seperate detentions. So Sirius gave one of them to Harry so that he can contact him if he ever needed help. After Sirius died, Mundungus used to steal things from the Blacks' house in order to sell them. One of these things was the mirror Sirius had kept for himself. Someone (You 'll find out who in the next movie) bought it from Mundungus so he could keep an eye on Harry.
No, that was a piece of a mirror that Sirius had given him before his death. It was connected to one that Sirius himself owned so that the two of them could see one another. Harry had accidentally broken his but kept a piece in the hopes that he could see Sirius once more.
Grindelwald stole the elder wand when he was much younger, in Godric's Hollow we get a flashback of him taking it in his youth. Then it came into Dumbledore's possession later on. I'm not sure how as I haven't read the books but I'm sure someone in the comments does 😅
7 books 7 movies 7 horcrox or something like that! Ohh fun fact I think Ron’s sister has been feeding Harry love potion and we never got to see it just like how hermine ( I can’t spell her name for the life of me ) had that neckless that was helping her go back in time
Grindewold (a dark wizard like Voldemort) stole the elder wand from Gregoravitch. Grindewold and Dumbledore were best friends/lovers as teenagers and had plans to take over the magical world as tyrants, but then Dumbledore had a change of heart after his sister was killed in the crossfire of a 3 way fight between Dumbledore, Grindewold and Dumbledore's brother Aberforth. Eventually he confronted and defeated Grindewold and took the elder wand for himself. It's too bad that the movies only hint at the backstory of Dumbledore in this book but never really explore it.
They learnt to apparate in the fifth book or potentially sixth book if memory serves me correctly. I’d definitely recommend reading the books, they’re a great read and have so much more detail properly linking things together.
I can't wait till you read the books. Some of your questions are book explained things so I don't want to answer them and spoil the books. I get why they left some things out but honestly they're quick one line explanations. I will say Sirius did talk about his brother in the 5th film and mentioned he was a death eater who was killed by Voldemort himself ( i hope that was in the film i'm sure it was). also never for get what Ollivander said in the first film "It's the wand who chooses the wizard."
The reason Kreacher was acting differently towards Harry than he did to Hermione is because Sirius not only left Grimauld Place (the former headquarters of the Order of the Phoenix) to Harry in a will but Harry also inherited Kreacher as well. As a result Kreacher is magically bound to obey Harry. Harry never freed Kreacher because Dumbledore asked Harry not to due to Kreacher knowing way to much about The Order of the Phoenix secret group. When Harry found out about Regelus Black being R.A.B Kreacher told Harry about how Regelus use to be a Deatheater during the first war. But one day Regelus found out that Voldemort was using his favorite house elf to experiment on when he was creating the evil magical defenses in the cave where the Slytherin locket was originally located. When Kreacher told Harry about how he was tortured by Voldemort and how Regelus sacrifice himself to save Kreacher, Harry felt sorry for Kreacher to the point that he gifted Kreacher the fake Slytherin locket that use to belong to Regelus. From that moment on, Kreacher changed his attitude not only towards Harry but he began to be kind to Hermione and Ron as well. 📿🪄
There's a scene coming up in the next one (and we all know the one I'm referencing) that, based on things you've said in this one.... well, it's going to blow your mind, and I'm SO looking forward to it! 😂 Great video, dude. Do you do your own editing? Because it's solid, and I think I actually have picked up some good editing ideas from you. Stay awesome! 💜
The wand lore is complex, is not explained to deeply in the films but basically every wand is a kind of sentient thing. All wands have "will" and "loyalty" the wand choose the wizard not otherwise, that's why Harry had the wand that he had, because that wand choose him. And that's why Hermione's wand or the one that Ron provided didn't work too well, because they didn't choose Harry and they're not loyal to him. They can do the work more or less, but not too well. When a witch or wizard lose a duel against other wizard/witch the wand can change its loyalty to favor the winner an will work better than a random wand. Yes, you can have multiple wands through your lifetime but it's not ideal. You have to take care of your wand, it's more than a tool, it's an extension of the wizard himself. And yes, the material (wood and core) you use to craft a wand influences its channeling power and can even favor aspects such as being better for enchantments or being better for hexes, etc. Some wands will be stronger depending on the personality of the wizard, some are ideal for ambitious wizards, others are for wizards of a healer nature, others will favor dark magic and so on. I hope this helps you and sorry for my English. ❤ Oh! Something else! The more advanced magic control a wizard has, the faster he or she can cast spells. More advanced wizards can make use of non-verbal magic, meaning they don't have to say out loud the spell they want to use, but instead channel the intention of their magic to cast it. You may notice that older wizards don't always cast their spells out loud.
It was horribly straining to be on the run. Often starving, because you can't conjure food out of thin air. I guess that contributed to Ron being "off". We know how much he appreciate good food and pudding. His mum is an excellent cook and the food at Hogwarts was also tasty and served regulary. As if it wasn't enough with his injury and the ever lingering bad self confidence. His brothers were head boys, or really popular, as is his only sister. His besties are 1) the most famous boy in the wizarding world and 2) the cleverest witch at her age, that Remus Lupin had ever met. We see in movie one in front of The Mirror Of Erised that Ron's most intense wish was to not stand in everyone else's shadow, but to shine himself, to stand out in his own right.
Annoyingly, the mirror is never explained! It isn’t from the mirror of erised, it was a gift Sirius gave Harry to allow him to communicate with him. Harry never used it because he was scared that Sirius might do something rash and leave his hiding place in OotP. Irony is that if Harry had just used the mirror to talk to Sirius, he would have known Voldemort had faked the dream and Sirius was fine and he wouldn’t have died…
they learn how do spells without talking year 6 well arer supposed to so with it being a movie its more fun to hear the spells but youll see magic without words also
Harry can order Kreacher around because Sirius left his house to Harry in his will, and Kreacher is bound to serve the master of the house.
There are so many things they missed out, little explanations from the books that would’ve helped the last film so much.
@@Lake420HThat goes for the whole series to be honest. Rather disappointing.
@@wolfe_tactics9075 it definitely does yeah
@@wolfe_tactics9075 There are many things left out, but it's not realistic to expect such little details in 2 hour long movies.
@@anonimosd.2872 I agree, but there are pieces of vital information left out that could have easily been included to make the movies make more sense as a stand-alone project. For example, the origin of the Marauders’ Map would explain how Professor Lupin knows how to use it, and yet it was omitted anyway.
For me, the problem isn’t the lack of book parallels. It’s the tactless omission of information crucial to the story.
I've never in my 20 years of being a harry potter fan saw better reactions to the movies, you pay so much attention to the details, I never want your reactions to end but at the same time I can't wait for you to watch the last one 😂
@loveyousomuchdear
Hi there! It`s always challenging to find good reaction channels.
I loved the HP reactions on the following channels:
- Rob & Trin react
- The Dork Side TV
- The Cocoa Couch
and two more eccentric ones:
- Veggie Gamer
- Sincerely, K.S.O.
Maybe you don`t know them yet and will like one or two of these :)
@@lechat8533 hi same here l also loved all the reaction chann you mentioned ,l found those while looking Harry Potter reactions as l am a big fan of the books and the films
@@lechat8533 thanksssss I'll def check them out 🎀💖💖
@@lechat8533 Also Jake Reacts is one of my favorites.
Def check out veggie gamer he legit takes notes lmao he’s amazing
I don't think there has ever been a time where i don't get emotional at Dobby's death, dude.
The movies omitted how Harry got that sliver of mirror in the 5th movie so it just suddenly appears with no explanation.
Yes, it was so frustrating rewatching the movies as an adult and it makes me feel like i missed something
Never clicked on a notification faster in my life
Same!
me too stopp
Absolutely!!
Definitely! I am loving his reactions to HP so much.
Normally I wait to I get home but I had to play this on the drive home.
5:06 The wand chooses the wizard, which is why Harry had the brother wand. He chose Lucius’ wand as a power move. To put Lucius further in “his place”.
41:29 The scene where Grindelwald is stealing the wand was decades before Harry Potter takes place, 35:58 the young man jumping from the window and the old man Voldemort was talking to are the same person, Gellert Grindelwald.
I work as a nanny & I helped one of my young charges do a school report about the wand lore of Harry Potter. The books & the official HP website were the only sources used for the report & we scoured all of them for every tidbit about wands.
Most magical youngsters get their first wand when they start secondary school at 11-12 years old.
The WAND chooses the wizard, as Olivander stated in the first book/movie & though a witch/wizard can use any wand they get the absolute best results with a wand that is loyal to them.
A wand’s loyalty is gained in a couple of ways. The wand choosing its master is the most common way to get its loyalty. Ron & Neville were using hand-me-down wands in the first few movies. Ron was using his brother Charlie’s old wand & Neville had his father’s. That’s why they struggled with casting spells. They were using wands that were not loyal to them & didn’t recognize them as their true masters & were reluctant to serve them. Once they got new wands that chose them Ron & Neville’s magic improved significantly.
The second way of gaining a wand’s loyalty is defeating the wands master through stealth or fighting. If you defeat another witch/wizard by outsmarting them (stealth) or defeating them in a fight their wand will switch its allegiance to you since you’ve proven you are better or stronger.
Intent is important. In the 5th movie when the kids were practicing disarming in the Room of Requirement they didn’t lose the loyalty of their wands if they were disarmed since they weren’t truly fighting each other & the person who disarmed them wasn’t trying to defeat them.
Dumbledore won the loyalty of the Elder Wand in a duel against the Dark Wizard Grindelwald. Grindelwald won it by stealing it from the wand maker Gregorovitch.
It is customary to bury a witch/wizard with their wand. Most magical people never lose the loyalty of their wand & when they die the wands power is “broken” since their true master is gone. They will not work properly for anyone else so they are buried with their master.
Badly damaged wands are nearly impossible to repair as we saw in Chamber of Secrets when Ron snapped the end off his brother’s old wand. He tried to repair it but couldn’t so he wrapped tape around it. As we saw the wand didn’t work properly. It backfired, shot sparks at odd times & sometimes didn’t work at all. That’s why he got a new one in the summer before third year. His new wand chose him & was loyal to him so Ron’s magic improved.
Wands & their masters have a symbiotic relationship. They are bonded with each other & learn together & from each other. A wand that’s good for Transfiguration will help its owner quickly learn how to transfigure. A wand whose properties lend it toward performing charms will help its owner master the skill. A wizard who prefers the Dark Arts will bend his wand into performing powerful curses. The relationship between wand & owner is very much a partnership/marriage.
I wish the movies had had time to explain the complex dynamics between the two since it’s so important to the overall story.
Not all wands will switch allegiance, usually dragon heartstring wands are the most likely to. A unicorn one for example will never change allegiance, at least while they still live, which is why Neville could never master his fathers.
A wand’s flexibly is more important than the core in forming allegiance. Bellatrix’s wand has a dragon heartstring core but Ollivander describes it as rigid. It did not change loyalty when Bellatrix was disarmed at Malfoy Manor.
Draco’s wand had a unicorn hair core & Ollivander said it was reasonably pliant. It changed allegiance. Not saying anything more about it at this point.
In the films you get Dobby only in 2 and 7. In the books, he is also in 4,5,6
So fun fact about the announcement of Moody's death, the guy who plays Bill Weasley who announced his death is played by his actual son!
Dobby has a grave just outside Swansea. It’s covered in painted pebbles and socks. ❤
Not sure if you picked up on this, but the Harry Potter storyline takes place during the 1990’s.
Splinching is when you don't move the entirety of your body from one place to the destination in exactly the right proximity to itself. Basically part of your body teleports an inch away from the rest of it, resulting in an injury like Ron gets. It can actually be a lot worse though. Wizards have left whole parts of themselves at the start location.
Or doesn't go with you at all
For your wand questions at the beginning: The wand chooses the wizard, Harry got his wand because it chose him. You can use other people’s wands but they won’t work as well. Voldemort chooses Lucius’s wand as punishment for his failings mainly regarding his failure of getting the prophecy, because now Lucius doesn’t have a wand and even if he finds another one it won’t work as well. Dragon Heartstring is a powerful wand core so Voldemorts disgust at the wand is more likely do to his disgust at Lucius.
Love that you remembered that little detail in the streets about the poster for Fenrir Greyback. Fenrir is also the werewolf who attacked Remus Lupin when he was only a child and turned him into a werewolf. *sniffles* Unfortunately,, yes, that was Avada Kedavra on Hedwig :( Any time a spell fires off green in this movie, it is the killing curse :(
In the book, it does a better job of explaining the reasoning of the fight in the beginning. They all figured that the Death Eaters would assume that Harry would be the one with the most powerful wizard, so that is why they went after Moody first as he's a powerful and very well respected Auror. Oh, and the Death Eater that curses off George's ear -- -- it was Snape.
If you remember at the beginning of Half-Blood Prince, Horus Slughorn says his condolences towards Harry for his Godfather's death and shows Harry a picture with Regulus in it, saying that he had taught the whole Black family...all except Sirius. So that was a name drop quite early on. And on the matter of House Elves..I am not sure if you can order around just any house elf, though Harry was able to do it to Kreacher, because he belongs to the Black family, and when Sirius died, he passed the house down to Harry, so Kreacher came with it. I wish they would have included in the movies the character growth of Kreacher...he really had a nice redemption arc in the books.
Polyjuice does still take that long to make - the movies don't really make the time spent hunting down the Horcruxes as well...they were really camping out and getting information for *months*! But you don't really feel that time gone. Also there are ways of doing spells without saying the words for the spell - like in the battle in The Order of the Phoenix, all you see in the Order vs DeathEater battle is wizards just whipping their wands around, silent for the most part. The ability to perform wordless magic is definitely much more advanced technique.
Fenrir Greyback was not only a notoriously savage werewolf who liked to place himself near children before he "turned," but he is the werewolf who purposely bit Remus Lupin just before Remus turned 5 years old.
That's actually super cool how you remembered Draco wanted to befriend Harry
"bloody hell" .. nothing more English than that. 😂
The Elder Wand was stolen from the Gregorovitch the wand maker by young Gellert Grindelwald sometime in the early 1900’s. That was shown in the scene of the young man jumping out of the window with the wand in his hand. It’s unknown how Gregorovitch got the wand.
Grindelwald was the Voldemort of the late 1930’s through the mid 1940’s. Dumbledore defeated Grindelwald in a duel in 1945 & won the Elder Wand from him. Grindelwald was imprisoned in a fortress & that’s where Voldemort questioned him about the wand in 1998. Voldemort kiIIed Grindelwald after learning the whereabouts of the Elder Wand.
'That looks like Dumbledores..' My instant reaction, '😮 Oh he LOCKED in!'
Such a beautiful place, to be with friends, Dobby is happy to be with his friend, Harry potter''
Wow you’re so observant 🤩
Some of the potholes you’ve noticed and questions you had are actually explained in the book. For example, Hermione stole the rest of Mad Eye’s stock of polyjuice potion.
Also in HBP, as 6th years they learn non-verbal spells and Apparition. Hermione earned her license to Apparate, Ron just failed the exam because he left part of an eyebrow behind, and Harry CAN Apparate but as he didn’t turn 17 before the end of the school year, so he couldn’t take the test at Hogwarts.
Hallows vs Horcruxes. Voldy only knew about horcruxes. He didn't know about the Hallows, he didn't know about wandlore, how wands worked. He thought the Elder Wand would make him undefeatable.
Bruh we need part 2 lol this has been a good ride great reactions brother!
Every HP fan….”the wand chooses the wizard!”
Unpacking "The Tale of the Three Brothers"
The story goes back more than a thousand years, from before Hogwarts was founded.
Back then, few people were literate, so oral history had to pass down information.
Some oral history was in song, some in poetic verse, some in storytelling. "The Tale of the Three Brothers" was storytelling.
To make stories easier to remember, they needed to be exciting, so the facts tended to get 'embellished'.
There was never an anthropomorphized entity of 'Death' bearing tricky gifts.
The artifacts were created by the Brothers Peverell themselves.
Antioch created the Elder Wand. Problem was, his pride and arrogance got the better of him. Instead of keeping it quiet that he owned such a powerful item, he flashed it around and was robbed of it. Likely he was killed to keep him from coming after the thief. The Wand passed through many hands over the ages, eventually coming to Grigorovich the Wandmaker, then stolen by Gellert Grindelwald, lost in a 3way duel to Albus Dumbledore who disarmed him, then Draco disarmed Dumbledore and Draco became its true master without even knowing it. Its loyalty can only be acquired by disarming Draco of a wand.
Cadmus created the badly-named 'Resurrection' Stone. The Stone DOES NOT bring people back to corporeal life; it's only power is to summon and hold captive the spirits of those who have died. The longer they are held, the more they suffer. But they cannot return to life; they do not 'resurrect' in the sense we understand. It passed from person to person before coming into the possession of Salazar Slytherin. When he died, it became a family heirloom, eventually passing down through the Gaunt family. Ton Riddle Jr's mother was a Gaunt, and when she died, he inherited it set as a stone in a ring. Tom eventually turned the ring and Stone into a horcrux, which Dumbledore was able to destroy at personal price (remember the black color of his hand?) while maintaining the power Cadmus had invested in the Stone to summon and capture spirits.
Ignotus created the Cloak of Invisibility, the only one ever made that retains its ability make the wearer invisible. All others either fully fail or must be 'recharged'. As the story says, it was passed down to the eldest son (or, if no son, the eldest daughter) over the ages. Eventually James Potter received it from his mother and was inherited by Harry. Hermione found the grave of Ignotus Peverell under a dusting of snow in the graveyard at Godric's Hollow on Christmas Eve.
As far as having all three artifacts make one 'master of death', that's pure nonsense; there is no evidence of that. It's misdirection, a red herring.
That was Ron who disarmed the guy who chased them out of the Ministry. Without looking, mind you
The "problem" with the spells is that you have to put a meaning into the incantation and its mostly based in latin for the english spells. So mostly the incantation describes the effect like for example "protego" to errect a shield in front of you. "Expecto patronum" means "I await a guardian." and so on.
Dobby's death hits me every time. He was so endearing. I am so excited to see your reaction to the finale where there are so many unexpected revelations and so many storylines that come together in one glorious, stressful, emotional rollercoaster of a film!! I promise that you will be satisfied in the end that you took this long trip, despite the pain and loss!!
also bathilda bagshot isnt a muggle she wrote the history of magic (one of the school books) and nagini (voldemorts snake) took her shape as voldemort knew she was close to the dumbledores so assumed to have nagini stay there incase harry showed up
“Everyone should I die I don’t even want us to win anymore” had me cackling
I clicked on this SO FRIGGIN FAST!
"fun" fact, Dobby was 100% practical during filming and everyone was sad during filming of those scenes.
Harry's godfather left him all of his possessions, which included the house and the house elf. So he is bound to serve his new master, Harry.
I really wish they had put more information about the house and Kreacher in this movie. Harry, Herminie, and Ron a lot of time there and there's a lot of information about Kreacher that shows his arch and is very important in this book.
In the books there was a painting of Serius Black’s mum who hated the fact that Harry and Hermione were in her house 😂😂😂 Kreacher followed her footsteps on hating muggles that is why he was so rude to Hermione
MY DAY HAS BEEN MADE
I've watched pretty much all the HP reactions out there and you are my favorite!! You're so clever, too
I’ve been waiting on the edge of my seatttt for thissss
Hermione thought Harry tasted better than Crabbe and Goyle.
BTW, she took the Polyjuice Potion most number of times of the three. She developed an addiction, said it was for research.
It was Moody's supply of Polyjuice Potion. They did not cook it up.
Yes, I was waiting for this let's goo 😊😊
Snapey Poo taught them non verbal spells in The Half Baked Prince. The Fool Director didn't show it. So you don't utter the spell out loud, so your enemy will know. Hermione was expert at it. The rest had expressions of U No Poo while practicing it.
Bro watching you see this for the first time is like reading it for the first time again
Remember in the first movie when Harry had to get a wand the first 2 wands blew up everything and the last one shone and chose him, and he was told funny that wand should choose you when it's brother gave you that scar?
Also in this movie when the wand Voldemort took from Lucius cracked and blew when he tried to use it. The wand has to chose you as well to answer your queries
I have to say, to go from another channel just starting on the first film and then straight onto this in one sitting, as I'm doing now - the tonal change is just...! 🤯
Absolutely love your reactions. When you got emotional over Dumbledore, I was wondering how you'd manage this one. To this day. Dobby's death hurts me.
You're one of the best reactors. I get immersed too so you're not alone.
You're nice, keep going. ❤
Opens it with “vengeance.” 😂😂😂 this is gonna be good
About Petrificus Totalis, in one of the books, they actually start learning how to do spells without words. I think saying the words is supposed to be a help in focusing the magic--more experienced wizards don't always need to say them.
Dobby was just happy to be free and to die surrounded by friends.
i swear i heard KP say see you in 2 hours, my eyes are burning its been 22 hours! guess i can wait a little longer
The first 2 words that Dobby speaks are also his last 2......
Harry Potter
😢😢😢😢😢
R.I.P. DOBBY
In the book Harry at the wedding was under the influence of polyjuice potion in the form of a red haired muggle from town that had a hair taken by George and/or Fred. (So he was playing at being a nonexistant Weasley relative)
Harry and Hermione were both using polyjuice as a random muggle couple and using the invisibility cloak in Godric Hollow in the book.
The deal with the mirror is this:
In Harry's 5th year (order of the phoenix) Sirius gave it to him. It was part of a pair of mirrors (small enough to fit in your pocket) that Sirius and James had created during their time at Hogwarts so they could communicate with each other when they would get seperate detentions. So Sirius gave one of them to Harry so that he can contact him if he ever needed help.
After Sirius died, Mundungus used to steal things from the Blacks' house in order to sell them. One of these things was the mirror Sirius had kept for himself. Someone (You 'll find out who in the next movie) bought it from Mundungus so he could keep an eye on Harry.
The trio stole MadEye's supply of polyjuice potion.
No, that was a piece of a mirror that Sirius had given him before his death. It was connected to one that Sirius himself owned so that the two of them could see one another. Harry had accidentally broken his but kept a piece in the hopes that he could see Sirius once more.
wish these would come out faster, really enjoy your reactions my guy
the scene of hermoine and harry dancing w the music is my fav scene in all the movies. :((
Everytime you think it's all going to be fine now, it's never fine. RIP Dobby
Grindelwald stole the elder wand when he was much younger, in Godric's Hollow we get a flashback of him taking it in his youth. Then it came into Dumbledore's possession later on. I'm not sure how as I haven't read the books but I'm sure someone in the comments does 😅
I love how invested you are. I can't freaking wait for the next part. Be prepared
KP, you are doing a great, great job.
The attention to detail is what’s gonna make the last part great!!
“I need retribution. I need justice.” *Me: I need part two* 😂
I saw the notification and suffered through the day to finally watch this at night. You’re an s tier react channel
7 books 7 movies
7 horcrox or something like that! Ohh fun fact I think Ron’s sister has been feeding Harry love potion and we never got to see it just like how hermine ( I can’t spell her name for the life of me ) had that neckless that was helping her go back in time
Genuinely one of my favorite RUclipsrs. So happy I stumbled on your channel.
Love it KP. Wish you the best from your cousin across the pond.
37:04 This rant about Draconius is my favourite part of this reaction 😂
not only a wand is brother. If only that will not have the second part it would be ending after 10 mins of the film 😂
Bruh that reaction as to why Hermione hit Harry with the Jinx when they were getting caught. Love these reactions!
‘I told you … dentist salary … in this economy.’
Grindewold (a dark wizard like Voldemort) stole the elder wand from Gregoravitch. Grindewold and Dumbledore were best friends/lovers as teenagers and had plans to take over the magical world as tyrants, but then Dumbledore had a change of heart after his sister was killed in the crossfire of a 3 way fight between Dumbledore, Grindewold and Dumbledore's brother Aberforth. Eventually he confronted and defeated Grindewold and took the elder wand for himself. It's too bad that the movies only hint at the backstory of Dumbledore in this book but never really explore it.
Yayyy you dropped can't for the second part !!!❤❤🎉
He is lip locking with your sister LMAO
You mentioned not being able to say the incantation quickly enough, well in the books it goes into the idea of casting without speaking.
Hell yea, here we go
what happened to doing both together ?
14:14 Eventually, wizards learn to cast spells without always needing to speak them aloud.
They learnt to apparate in the fifth book or potentially sixth book if memory serves me correctly. I’d definitely recommend reading the books, they’re a great read and have so much more detail properly linking things together.
Harry can give orders to Kreacher, because he inherited Kreacher from Sirius, along with everything else belonging to him.
loving this series bro
I can't wait till you read the books. Some of your questions are book explained things so I don't want to answer them and spoil the books. I get why they left some things out but honestly they're quick one line explanations. I will say Sirius did talk about his brother in the 5th film and mentioned he was a death eater who was killed by Voldemort himself ( i hope that was in the film i'm sure it was). also never for get what Ollivander said in the first film "It's the wand who chooses the wizard."
The reason Kreacher was acting differently towards Harry than he did to Hermione is because Sirius not only left Grimauld Place (the former headquarters of the Order of the Phoenix) to Harry in a will but Harry also inherited Kreacher as well. As a result Kreacher is magically bound to obey Harry. Harry never freed Kreacher because Dumbledore asked Harry not to due to Kreacher knowing way to much about The Order of the Phoenix secret group.
When Harry found out about Regelus Black being R.A.B Kreacher told Harry about how Regelus use to be a Deatheater during the first war. But one day Regelus found out that Voldemort was using his favorite house elf to experiment on when he was creating the evil magical defenses in the cave where the Slytherin locket was originally located. When Kreacher told Harry about how he was tortured by Voldemort and how Regelus sacrifice himself to save Kreacher, Harry felt sorry for Kreacher to the point that he gifted Kreacher the fake Slytherin locket that use to belong to Regelus. From that moment on, Kreacher changed his attitude not only towards Harry but he began to be kind to Hermione and Ron as well.
📿🪄
So excited for him to see what Molly does in the next film ikyky
There's a scene coming up in the next one (and we all know the one I'm referencing) that, based on things you've said in this one.... well, it's going to blow your mind, and I'm SO looking forward to it! 😂 Great video, dude. Do you do your own editing? Because it's solid, and I think I actually have picked up some good editing ideas from you. Stay awesome! 💜
Could you imagine having a wizard duel with Busta Rhymes?
I love your contemplations. I'm like thinking along with you.
The wand lore is complex, is not explained to deeply in the films but basically every wand is a kind of sentient thing. All wands have "will" and "loyalty" the wand choose the wizard not otherwise, that's why Harry had the wand that he had, because that wand choose him. And that's why Hermione's wand or the one that Ron provided didn't work too well, because they didn't choose Harry and they're not loyal to him. They can do the work more or less, but not too well. When a witch or wizard lose a duel against other wizard/witch the wand can change its loyalty to favor the winner an will work better than a random wand. Yes, you can have multiple wands through your lifetime but it's not ideal. You have to take care of your wand, it's more than a tool, it's an extension of the wizard himself. And yes, the material (wood and core) you use to craft a wand influences its channeling power and can even favor aspects such as being better for enchantments or being better for hexes, etc. Some wands will be stronger depending on the personality of the wizard, some are ideal for ambitious wizards, others are for wizards of a healer nature, others will favor dark magic and so on. I hope this helps you and sorry for my English. ❤ Oh! Something else! The more advanced magic control a wizard has, the faster he or she can cast spells. More advanced wizards can make use of non-verbal magic, meaning they don't have to say out loud the spell they want to use, but instead channel the intention of their magic to cast it. You may notice that older wizards don't always cast their spells out loud.
👏 👏 👏 I can't wait for ur last reaction to the final film
“Hey listen”
It was horribly straining to be on the run. Often starving, because you can't conjure food out of thin air. I guess that contributed to Ron being "off". We know how much he appreciate good food and pudding. His mum is an excellent cook and the food at Hogwarts was also tasty and served regulary. As if it wasn't enough with his injury and the ever lingering bad self confidence. His brothers were head boys, or really popular, as is his only sister. His besties are
1) the most famous boy in the wizarding world and
2) the cleverest witch at her age, that Remus Lupin had ever met.
We see in movie one in front of The Mirror Of Erised that Ron's most intense wish was to not stand in everyone else's shadow, but to shine himself, to stand out in his own right.
"Yep, we're screwed." 😅😂
Annoyingly, the mirror is never explained! It isn’t from the mirror of erised, it was a gift Sirius gave Harry to allow him to communicate with him. Harry never used it because he was scared that Sirius might do something rash and leave his hiding place in OotP. Irony is that if Harry had just used the mirror to talk to Sirius, he would have known Voldemort had faked the dream and Sirius was fine and he wouldn’t have died…
Brother we better not have to wait a full week for Part 2!!!!!! I knowwwwww you watched it already damn!
The sliver of mirror harry got sent from Sirius in the 5th book. They left it out of the movie which was silly.
❤❤❤ finally!! I am love your reaction's. 🎉🎉🎉 I am waiting for this. 😊
Really enjoying the uploads. Hopefully you're gonna watch the 20th anniversary return to Hogwarts reunion.
I assume you've seen the other movies recently before this one, because you ask questions that are explained in the movies and very clearly as well.
On the subject of spells you can actually *say* in a hurry: There's always silent casting, or else, just using a simple "STUPEFY!"
You need the books ❤
The horcrux made Hermione cook bad mushrooms and wear perfume.
The Second Wizarding War was brutal in my opinion.
they learn how do spells without talking year 6 well arer supposed to so with it being a movie its more fun to hear the spells but youll see magic without words also
you have tto be 17 to learn to apparate so hermione and maybe ron learned the year before then took the test when they hit the required age.