Nasaan ang suporta ng gobyerno sa SABAH CLAIM ---Senator Robinhood "Robin" Padilla
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 фев 2024
- #senate #sultan #sabah #muslim #robinpadilla #tolentino #mindanao #china #malaysia #philippines #pbbm #sara #duterte #maritime #zone
@jesnabsvlog
Yes senator idol 100% tama po kayo sa lahat ng senator ikaw lng tlaga ang my malasakit sa sovereignty ng ating bansa d nasayang ang boto ko po sa iyo sir senator idol .... Mabuhay po kayo
Nag paka hero ngayon si Robin sa saba pero sa WPS. Pabor siya sa china
tama yan kailangan kunin ang ating mga lupain dahil atin yan.
Ha ha ha ha ha. What evidence do you have to include Sabah in the sovereign territory of the Republic of the Philippines? Read my earlier comment and rebut with facts and references. NOT HEARSAY.
For the first time napabilib ako ni Robin Padilla on his stand on the North Borneo territory ( Sabah ) for clear and defined inclusion in the sovereign territory of the Republic of the Philippines.
Ha ha ha ha ha. What evidence do you have to include Sabah in the sovereign territory of the Republic of the Philippines. Read my earlier comment and rebut with facts and references. NOT HEARSAY.
Ofcourse they have the evidence panoorin mo the whole video po kasi
@@tjyu1778 Ha ha ha ha. They DO NOT have any evidence. That is why Sulu/PH lost many court cases including at ICJ in 2001 and arbitration court in Europe in 2023.
Wala na bagkabayaran na jan nag iba ang ihip na hangin jan sa saba claim
Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, after the second point above, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay.
Ang claim ng Pilipinas sa Sabah ay nakasaad sa batas ng Pilipinas sa pamamagitan ng Republic Act.
@@Fortune-md5jkHa ha ha ha. What law are you talking about? The 1987 PH Constitution which is the supreme law of the land did not mention Sabah. It overrule all the other PH constitutions before 1987. Even the PH Baseline Law RA 9522 also do not mention Sabah too. Go and read.
Sabah ka ng sabah e wala ka namang sinasabi tungkol sa WPS huwag mong iliko ang publiko WPS ang dapat minang isaayos at ung sabah e. madali na un!!!
.Ang Sabah claim ay ilan dekada na at dumaan na sa ilang presidente hanggang ngayon ay nganga pa rin ang Pilipinas samantala ang West Philippine Sea ay nagsimula ang sigalot nung panahon lang ni President Noynoy Aquino na unico hijo ng bayaning si Sen. Ninoy Aquino.
Aii tagalogin muna lng..
Si Tolentino din panay ang English bakit hindi mo siya kastigohin.
Ayon kay Sen Padilla, ang Sabah ay pag aari ng mga Muslim. Diba ang mga Muslim dito sa Pilipinas ay mga Filipino? Diba mas maganda at karapatdapat na sabihin na ang Sabah ay pag aari ng Pilipinas at ng mga Filipino?
Ha ha ha ha ha. What evidence do you have to include Sabah in the sovereign territory of the Republic of the Philippines? Read my earlier comment and rebut with facts and references. NOT HEARSAY.
@@hopelope1703 Padilla was the one who said so. Just reacted to his pronouncement that it is owned by the Muslims. What Muslims was he referring to? Was it the Filipino Muslims or Muslims of other countries?
@@ariesalbert Ha ha ha ha. When you make such a claim on Sabah, make sure you have the evidence. That is why PH and Sulu lost many court cases pertaining to ownership on Sabah. Read many of my previous comments. You and him just based on hearsay. Rebut with facts and references.
@@hopelope1703 I'm not arguing with you. Can we please understand it's other. Mahina ba ang pang intindi mo? Ang pinupunto sa aking comment ay tungkol sa sinabi ni Padilla na pagaari daw ng mga Muslim. Bakit ang mga Filipino Muslims ba ay may sarili ng Bansa? Ang problema, ngawa ka ng ngawa, hindi naman yang issue mo ang issue ko. Wala akong problema kung sino man ang nagmamay ari niyan dahil hindi yan ang punto ko.
@@ariesalbert My contention is that when you make any reference regarding statement from anyone, make sure you check it out first.
ENGOT Robin.... wala na pag asa ang SABAH question... too late to get it from Malaysian control
TaKOT BA ANG PILIPINAS SA MALAYSIA AT HINDI TAKOT SA CHINA KASI MAY BACKER NA US.
@@Fortune-md5jkHa ha ha ha. Did you read all my comments? It is a hopeless case. Even PH lost the court case at ICJ in 2001 pertaining to Sabah. All arbitration court cases brought up by Sulu in Europe were lost.
Aabutin yan ng magdamag sa istorya mo
Si Tolentino din ay kilometro ang sagot pero ang napansin mo lang ay si sen. Robin. Yun kay Robin ay hindi istorya kundi base sa historical fact at hindi kwentong kutsero.
Ayusin mo ang pagdeliver mo ng privilege speech
Hoy… d po yan privilege speech…
Interpolation yan….
Bago ka mag interpellate ay dapat magbigay ka muna ng premise or laying the predicate, hindi mo yata alam sa parliamentary procedure basta lang makapagbatikos kay Sen. Robin,, at yun ay precisely ang ginawa ni Sen. Robin bago niya tanugin si Tolentino. Pinaghandaan niya ang pag interpellate kay Tolentino.
Pilipinas Ito..Mag Tagalog ka.
Pati si Tolentino.
Tumpak yun sinabi ni idol Sen. Robin Padilla, puro West Philippines Sea at nakaligtaan na yun tungkol sa Sabah na lupain yun samantala ang West Philippine sea ay dagat yun na hindi puwede na matirhan ng tao. Historically ay ang Sabah belongs to the Philippine. Hindi kaya ang isyu ng West Philippine Sea ay may naguudyok na paigtigin ng tensyon na nasa likod ang pagsusulsul ng America at ang mga allies nito katulad ng UK, Australia na lahat sila ay xenophobia na iisa ang kanilang lahi na ancestry.
Ha ha ha ha what history are you talking about Sabah belongs to PH? You can't even show me evidence that Brunei Sultanate gave Sabah to Sulu as a gift.
Nagmamarunong ang hunghang!
Nakupo! Alam na ng lahat yan! Wla na ata masabi si senador pa pogi nmn
Muslim daw dapat Pilipino Hai Nakupo talaga nmn
@@noeljrrosas47 kokonti ang mga pilipino lalo na ang mga kabataan na may alam tungkol sa Sabah claim kasi busy sila sa TikTok at hindi tinuturo sa eskwelahan.
Oy Robin kahit ikaw pa pinaka makapangyarihang tao Dimo makukuha ang gusto mo
Wala akng pakialam syo robingok
Wala kang pakiaalam eh bakit ka nakikinig sa interpellation ni Sen. Robin kay Tolentino, ha ha ha?
Ano ba yan,Hindi nga West Phil Sea. Sabah na naman.
Gusto lang ni sen. Robin na ilagay sa tamang perspective na walang pagkakaiba ng claims ng Pilipinas sa Sabah at sa WPS.