Lawyer Tsikata as usual wanted his delay tactics but it won't work this time around. The justices are just tired with his antics. Lawyer Damey is waiting for him in the future after this.
Tsikata is old school lawyer and lacks the tenacity and the drive to be a lead Counsel for the NDC. Anyway, the value is the same - indecision and incompetence is the Trade Mark of John Mahama and Tsikata. Asem oooo.
Tsikata was too smart and the judges hands are bang imagine the supreme court ruling against their own precedence, that is ice beg ,it has exposed the judges
Tsikata just wanted a way to prolong the case. There’s nothing smart about this when he sought answers for questions which they’ve not raised anywhere in their own petition.
You are very ignorant and the saddest part is u spk with conviction. The supreme court is not mandated to accept processes of lower courts (ci 47) its discretionary and therefore not binding! However the supreme courts rejection is to do with relevance! John Mahama has no case and all these interlocutory applications are delay tactics! You lodge a petition and yet ur not ready...all u want to do is waste the courts time with issues irrelevant to the substantive case!
@@akronfostopthem2043 the precedent ur talking about is based on ci47 which is based on high courts proceedings...again as i said discretionary provisions are not binding..n dealt with by merits! There is no merit for this request as it is irrelevant. The law is based on interpretation and therefore nothing is binding! Precedents can be departed from if there is something materially different from the previous!
What Tsikata said is very important in the petitioners case. He's trying to box them into a corner. Akoto Ampaw has seen that so he is requesting the case move quickly. The justices hands are tied because they'll have to give the petitioners certified copies of the ruling. Then Tsatsu will sneak in more evidence to circumvent the new litigation process. That's the hallmark of a good lawyer. This is because the justices hands are tied
The law lies in the bosom of the the Judges. No lawyer can tie their hands. If Tsatu disagrees with their decision the only option he has is to seek a review which is not possible under the circumstance since the decision is Unanimous.
@@westafricacharles7588 yes I agree that the law lies in the Bossom of the judges but the justices have to be fair to the parties. In the attempt to show fairness, some layers use it to their advantage and it is those lawyers who are smart and know the law that benefit. This is not to say someone has won a case.
Please throw away the wigs. Ain't they ashamed to be wearing the symbol of colonialism in 2021. 2013 you were not wearing wigs, 2021 you all wearing wigs. Ghana is going backwards.
We don't have judges of a particular president. All judges are appointed by different presidents. Who appointed Atuguba, Gbedebe and Adinyira? You must be ashamed of your frivolous comment.
@@twikwamegh397 How many Supreme Court Judges did Akuffo Addo appoint in just 4 years? Why’s Akuffo Addo’s New Judges selected for the election petition instead of senior Judges? Where are the senior Judges before Akuffo Addo’s Appointees? USA of over 350 million population has 9 Supreme Court Judges but Akuffo-Addo has turned the Ghanaian Supreme Court into super-market for power-grab.
Why is the NDC being intolerant to accept defeat? The NDC dangerous ignorance questions aided at disputing the election results 'childishly' is obvious. Forget it, Ghanaians have grown pass your twisting intelligence with all due respect. Please do give Ghanaians some due respect. Stop pushing to subvert the majority of Ghanaians mandate. Please please please
Na wow for brainwashed persons like you oh! Its so sad when our institutions are used as political football! In 2012 was it Mahama's paymasters who decided on ruling which clearly showed Akufo Addo won but for the sake of peace in Gh they just gave it to Mahama 5-4? N are all the 7 judges new judges? A child born an hour ago can see this case is without merit! How can u bring a petition based on an inadvertent error which was corrected, when u urself have made so many errors on ur so called petition! The petitioner is just trying to delay...a joke and a half!
@@LB-xo6in CAN I ASK 1 SIMPLE QUESTION. I AM AN NPP BUT I CAN TELL U PLAINLY THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED AND YOU KNOW IT.I DONT SUPPORT A PARTY FOOLISHLY.NANA ADDO AND JEAN MENSAH RIGGED THE ELECTION.THE JUDGES KNOW IF JEAN MENSAH CAME TO THE PRE TRIAL SHE WILL BE EXPOSED BIG TIME IN PROCEEDINGS BY TSATSU AND SHE MIGHT COMPLICATE HERSELF WHEN THE MATCH STARTED.THE REASON THEY ARE PREVENTING HIM.IN 2012 NANA ADDO WAS GRANTED PRE TRIAL BY SUPREME COURT THE REASON TSATSU REMIND THE CHIEF JUSTICE.HE WAS A JUDGE IN 2012 NOT TO CHANGE THE LAW BUT YET THEY SWEPT IT UNDER THE CARPET.ALL 7 JUDGES SUPPORT THE MOTION.SO DONT COMPARE THOSE SET OF JUDGES WITH MAHAMA FAIR NEUTRAL JUDGES THAT HAD JUDGES NOT VOTING UNANIMOUSLY.THIS JUDGES CANT ACCEPT EVIDENCE BEFORE THEM BECAUSE NANA AND JEAN MUST BE CLEARED BY HOOK OR CROOK.NOBODY CAN BRAINWASHED ME.I DONT FOLLOW PARTY WITH MY STOMACH AND TRIBE.I AM AN NPP N ASHANTI MAN BUT WHAT IS WRONG IS WRONG.THIS JUDGES WILL BE BIASED THROUGHOUT.
@@llyodgarmodon7115 I am sorry sheep in wolves clothing what was ur question again? You are not npp...we have no time for people like u...nothing u said in ur long essay makes sense. If those questions are so important Tsatu can ask when he does his cross examination. What fool says election was rigged but the same EC didn't rig the parliamentary...I guess u are happy with the parliamentary. This election was the fairest, most transparent election ever held in Ghana...thats why Mahama is going to court with no evidence and wasting time with irrelevant questions n tactics. Have you taken a look at the petition? Do you know Mahama is not disputing even 1 polling station result? He is simply saying because the EC inadvertently made a mistake with the declaration...the figure she based the declaration on will give Nana Addo 49 plus %. Are u out of ur mind. Get the f#ck out of here!
This Akuffo Addo's lawyers must always remember that, all the 6 out of 7 Lawyers sitting on this case, were appointed by Akuffo Addo. So when cases of the NDC are being dismiss, that does not mean, they are better lawyers than the NDC lawyers. As usual, these same SC judges made a U - turn on their own ruling regarding our Birth Certificate and the Old Voter ID Card all because of politics. Today, they can not stand by their own precedent set in 2012 election petition, all because of politics, for it was the same thing Tsatsu was asking for? Why are they refusing Jean Mensa from being question?
Firstly, do you understand that because of the same delay tactics that led to the 2012/13 petition lasting 8months new rules was set for all new petitions? Secondly ci 47 which Tsatu is relying on is lower courts procedure which is not binding...it is discretionary, however the courts rejection is based on relevance! What he is asking for has no relevance to the substantive issues... Thirdly the fact that u still dont understand that ur birth certificate does not prove citizenship in countries where there is no birth right citizenship goes to show ur ability to objectively deal with issues. Lastly ur remarks abt the judges are untrue and distasteful! Lets stop using out institutions for political football!
@@LB-xo6in U meant asking the court to go by their own precedent set in 2012 would amount to delay tactics? Total Rubbish. Why are they protecting Jean Mensa to the extent that, even mentioning her name is even a problem. No wonder takiing goat and yam is what they are good at. They can do all that they want, the fact remains that, the useless Jean Mensa rigged the election for Akuffo Addo.
@@wasawawawasa8307 You can only rely on precedent when all material facts are identical wai...again take not that ci47 is a procedure from a lower court, if a higher court patronises it..its still not binding because it is discretionary. However the courts reason for departing from it, is that the facts are materially different. Educate urself and stop screaming and insulting! Empty barrels makes the most noise. I can't even believe u have the nerve to talk about rigging. After weeks of claiming they won the election ndc is now in court claiming they want a run off cos they got 46% and Akufo Addo had 49% plus based on an inadvertent error of announcements. That the whole case! Shameless inbreds! Sometimes im not sure if ndc and their followers are as dumb as they sound or they are just being intellectually dishonest. In 2012 npp went to court with real evidence of voter fraud and wide spread rigging..the decision was a narrow one, 5-4. You can tell whn you read the judgement that even the judges knew nana won but to avoid chaos in Ghana, they gave a narrow judgement in favour of the incumbent...even then whn the winning margin was lower.
How many Supreme Court Judges did Akuffo Addo appoint in just 4 years? Why’s Akuffo Addo’s New Judges selected for the election petition instead of senior Judges? Where are the senior Judges before Akuffo Addo’s Appointees? USA of over 350 million population has 9 Supreme Court Judges but Akuffo-Addo has turned the Ghanaian Supreme Court into super-market for power-grab.
Lawyer Tsatsu Tsikata is a smart guy. 🔥🔥
Lawyer Tsikata as usual wanted his delay tactics but it won't work this time around. The justices are just tired with his antics. Lawyer Damey is waiting for him in the future after this.
Precedence always bounces back. Time will tell.
Tsikata is old school lawyer and lacks the tenacity and the drive to be a lead Counsel for the NDC. Anyway, the value is the same - indecision and incompetence is the Trade Mark of John Mahama and Tsikata. Asem oooo.
Lawyer Tsatsu Tsikata as usual wanted to prolong matters like they did in the other case passed. The case is dead on arrival.. .
This was exactly what I expected
Mr. You have to leave office
Tsikata was too smart and the judges hands are bang imagine the supreme court ruling against their own precedence, that is ice beg ,it has exposed the judges
Tsikata just wanted a way to prolong the case. There’s nothing smart about this when he sought answers for questions which they’ve not raised anywhere in their own petition.
You are very ignorant and the saddest part is u spk with conviction. The supreme court is not mandated to accept processes of lower courts (ci 47) its discretionary and therefore not binding! However the supreme courts rejection is to do with relevance! John Mahama has no case and all these interlocutory applications are delay tactics! You lodge a petition and yet ur not ready...all u want to do is waste the courts time with issues irrelevant to the substantive case!
@@LB-xo6in
It's not about lower court ,its abt supreme court own precedent
@@LB-xo6in by the way were you graduated from npp university school of Lies kumarica?
@@akronfostopthem2043 the precedent ur talking about is based on ci47 which is based on high courts proceedings...again as i said discretionary provisions are not binding..n dealt with by merits! There is no merit for this request as it is irrelevant. The law is based on interpretation and therefore nothing is binding! Precedents can be departed from if there is something materially different from the previous!
The npp lawyers are shivering as if they are suffering from joundis
What Tsikata said is very important in the petitioners case. He's trying to box them into a corner. Akoto Ampaw has seen that so he is requesting the case move quickly. The justices hands are tied because they'll have to give the petitioners certified copies of the ruling. Then Tsatsu will sneak in more evidence to circumvent the new litigation process. That's the hallmark of a good lawyer. This is because the justices hands are tied
lol..who's hands are tied?😂
@@kwesibravo5064 for fair trial, they'll have to allow Tsatsu's request. Then now, he can sneak in further issues.
Who's hands are tied unnecessary speculations just to create tension. Allow the system to work.
The law lies in the bosom of the the Judges. No lawyer can tie their hands. If Tsatu disagrees with their decision the only option he has is to seek a review which is not possible under the circumstance since the decision is Unanimous.
@@westafricacharles7588 yes I agree that the law lies in the Bossom of the judges but the justices have to be fair to the parties. In the attempt to show fairness, some layers use it to their advantage and it is those lawyers who are smart and know the law that benefit. This is not to say someone has won a case.
The question can be asked during cross examination. Why
Interesting
What's a military man in a uniform doing in civilian court?
Hahahahaaaa are these Supreme Court Judges of Ghana? Seriously?
Please throw away the wigs. Ain't they ashamed to be wearing the symbol of colonialism in 2021. 2013 you were not wearing wigs, 2021 you all wearing wigs. Ghana is going backwards.
Exactly my thoughts! Even the colonialists who introduced these wigs have stopped wearing them.
True ooooo
It stands for grey hair which means that they will be telling truth. In fact, nothing but the truth. But here we are.......??
In...ghana....no....mam....no.....soldier....
Another Saga of Akuffo Addo’s appointed Judges. Why should Akuffo Addo’s newly appointed Judges form the majority in the election hearings?
Go and ask Atugunba, who presided over the same election petition in 2012.
We don't have judges of a particular president. All judges are appointed by different presidents. Who appointed Atuguba, Gbedebe and Adinyira? You must be ashamed of your frivolous comment.
@@twikwamegh397 How many Supreme Court Judges did Akuffo Addo appoint in just 4 years? Why’s Akuffo Addo’s New Judges selected for the election petition instead of senior Judges? Where are the senior Judges before Akuffo Addo’s Appointees? USA of over 350 million population has 9 Supreme Court Judges but Akuffo-Addo has turned the Ghanaian Supreme Court into super-market for power-grab.
There the pastor goes...........
Hmmm ghana 🇬🇭
Much I do about nothing! Beasts of no nation.
This is not court is tsikata vs npp machinery.
Hahaha i can see this case is a paybact to Justice Atuguba
Heeeyyy
Why is the NDC being intolerant to accept defeat?
The NDC dangerous ignorance questions aided at disputing the election results 'childishly' is obvious.
Forget it, Ghanaians have grown pass your twisting intelligence with all due respect. Please do give Ghanaians some due respect. Stop pushing to subvert the majority of Ghanaians mandate.
Please please please
Corrupted court.
What is CORRUPT about the court?
Please stop making thoughtless statements about our Supreme Court.
We called mumu judges, shame
How can 7 Akuffo Addo appointees n friends listen to Tsatsu.They cant favour Mahama over their pay master.Nana
Na wow for brainwashed persons like you oh! Its so sad when our institutions are used as political football! In 2012 was it Mahama's paymasters who decided on ruling which clearly showed Akufo Addo won but for the sake of peace in Gh they just gave it to Mahama 5-4? N are all the 7 judges new judges? A child born an hour ago can see this case is without merit! How can u bring a petition based on an inadvertent error which was corrected, when u urself have made so many errors on ur so called petition! The petitioner is just trying to delay...a joke and a half!
@@LB-xo6in CAN I ASK 1 SIMPLE QUESTION. I AM AN NPP BUT I CAN TELL U PLAINLY THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED AND YOU KNOW IT.I DONT SUPPORT A PARTY FOOLISHLY.NANA ADDO AND JEAN MENSAH RIGGED THE ELECTION.THE JUDGES KNOW IF JEAN MENSAH CAME TO THE PRE TRIAL SHE WILL BE EXPOSED BIG TIME IN PROCEEDINGS BY TSATSU AND SHE MIGHT COMPLICATE HERSELF WHEN THE MATCH STARTED.THE REASON THEY ARE PREVENTING HIM.IN 2012 NANA ADDO WAS GRANTED PRE TRIAL BY SUPREME COURT THE REASON TSATSU REMIND THE CHIEF JUSTICE.HE WAS A JUDGE IN 2012 NOT TO CHANGE THE LAW BUT YET THEY SWEPT IT UNDER THE CARPET.ALL 7 JUDGES SUPPORT THE MOTION.SO DONT COMPARE THOSE SET OF JUDGES WITH MAHAMA FAIR NEUTRAL JUDGES THAT HAD JUDGES NOT VOTING UNANIMOUSLY.THIS JUDGES CANT ACCEPT EVIDENCE BEFORE THEM BECAUSE NANA AND JEAN MUST BE CLEARED BY HOOK OR CROOK.NOBODY CAN BRAINWASHED ME.I DONT FOLLOW PARTY WITH MY STOMACH AND TRIBE.I AM AN NPP N ASHANTI MAN BUT WHAT IS WRONG IS WRONG.THIS JUDGES WILL BE BIASED THROUGHOUT.
@@llyodgarmodon7115 I am sorry sheep in wolves clothing what was ur question again? You are not npp...we have no time for people like u...nothing u said in ur long essay makes sense. If those questions are so important Tsatu can ask when he does his cross examination. What fool says election was rigged but the same EC didn't rig the parliamentary...I guess u are happy with the parliamentary. This election was the fairest, most transparent election ever held in Ghana...thats why Mahama is going to court with no evidence and wasting time with irrelevant questions n tactics. Have you taken a look at the petition? Do you know Mahama is not disputing even 1 polling station result? He is simply saying because the EC inadvertently made a mistake with the declaration...the figure she based the declaration on will give Nana Addo 49 plus %. Are u out of ur mind. Get the f#ck out of here!
Lies
The same way Mahama relation Atuguba was chairman of the 2012-13 election petition.
If the court doesn't work Action will do
Exactly
Fool what can u do
@@ank1982 war will do
From we won to court to grant run-off...brain washed F*******
@@yahushabloodpower3021 KWASIA GYEA GYIMIII NO
U CANT DO FUKU NDC TILL NEXT 1206727473years remain opposition
This Akuffo Addo's lawyers must always remember that, all the 6 out of 7 Lawyers sitting on this case, were appointed by Akuffo Addo. So when cases of the NDC are being dismiss, that does not mean, they are better lawyers than the NDC lawyers. As usual, these same SC judges made a U - turn on their own ruling regarding our Birth Certificate and the Old Voter ID Card all because of politics. Today, they can not stand by their own precedent set in 2012 election petition, all because of politics, for it was the same thing Tsatsu was asking for? Why are they refusing Jean Mensa from being question?
Firstly, do you understand that because of the same delay tactics that led to the 2012/13 petition lasting 8months new rules was set for all new petitions? Secondly ci 47 which Tsatu is relying on is lower courts procedure which is not binding...it is discretionary, however the courts rejection is based on relevance! What he is asking for has no relevance to the substantive issues...
Thirdly the fact that u still dont understand that ur birth certificate does not prove citizenship in countries where there is no birth right citizenship goes to show ur ability to objectively deal with issues.
Lastly ur remarks abt the judges are untrue and distasteful! Lets stop using out institutions for political football!
@@LB-xo6in Thank you, good job.
My advice is once you know 6 out of the 7 were appointed by Nana Addo, then it is better you don't go to court.
@@LB-xo6in U meant asking the court to go by their own precedent set in 2012 would amount to delay tactics? Total Rubbish. Why are they protecting Jean Mensa to the extent that, even mentioning her name is even a problem. No wonder takiing goat and yam is what they are good at. They can do all that they want, the fact remains that, the useless Jean Mensa rigged the election for Akuffo Addo.
@@wasawawawasa8307 You can only rely on precedent when all material facts are identical wai...again take not that ci47 is a procedure from a lower court, if a higher court patronises it..its still not binding because it is discretionary. However the courts reason for departing from it, is that the facts are materially different. Educate urself and stop screaming and insulting! Empty barrels makes the most noise. I can't even believe u have the nerve to talk about rigging. After weeks of claiming they won the election ndc is now in court claiming they want a run off cos they got 46% and Akufo Addo had 49% plus based on an inadvertent error of announcements. That the whole case! Shameless inbreds! Sometimes im not sure if ndc and their followers are as dumb as they sound or they are just being intellectually dishonest. In 2012 npp went to court with real evidence of voter fraud and wide spread rigging..the decision was a narrow one, 5-4. You can tell whn you read the judgement that even the judges knew nana won but to avoid chaos in Ghana, they gave a narrow judgement in favour of the incumbent...even then whn the winning margin was lower.
How many Supreme Court Judges did Akuffo Addo appoint in just 4 years? Why’s Akuffo Addo’s New Judges selected for the election petition instead of senior Judges? Where are the senior Judges before Akuffo Addo’s Appointees? USA of over 350 million population has 9 Supreme Court Judges but Akuffo-Addo has turned the Ghanaian Supreme Court into super-market for power-grab.
STOP bleeding BRO. Remember most of the senior judges retired in 2018. Abaa y3de bo Tekyi no y3de b3bo Baah. Karma is at work my brother.
No wonder , something like this normally comes from u people.... Mtewww
Tsatsu is the law
Tsatsu is the law
Supreme goats get ready
They can not even speak english.
Low life comment. With your English have worked even as a court clark before? Lol