I'm so happy to see a Deep sky videos upload featuring Dr Becky again!! I believe that DSV is how I found Dr. Becky's channel to begin with. Both get me beyond excited when I see new uploads! Thank you so much for the TOP NOTCH content friends!
This is my favorite Messier object galaxy in this region of Coma Berenices. Saved one of the very best for nearly last! And so many supernovae!!!! I can’t wait to see the 6D map of this area so we can see the effect of ram pressure stripping and correlated motion in this cluster and supercluster. Looking forward to your award speech BTW. I wish I could see the universe played back like a movie, and watch all these described processes happening in real-time! Each galaxy is like a person, wearing the scars and history of their interactions with their fellows and their environment. We like the crow’s feet on the face of galaxies betraying hints of their life experience.
Also worth mentioning that M100 is famous for the Hubble telescope comparison photos: one photo of it was a blurry picture taken by Hubble before its first orbital servicing mission, when the overbuffed side of the main mirror was preventing it from focusing well, & a second picture of the same spot in M100 after the servicing mission. The M100 comparison photo is probably the most often used pair of pictures that exemplifies how poor Hubble’s vision was prior to servicing & how much better it became after.
That's what I'm wondering. Is there different types of light or radiation coming from the jellyfish outflow that can be differentiated from the galaxy itself?
I think they could tell if stars were behind or in front of it based on redshift. Not sure if it works on distances that “small” but I’m confident they have some way of telling if it’s jellyfishy or not
Jellyfished Galaxies are Commonly found on Center of well crowded galaxy clusters... The Jellyfished galaxies had been Developed from Tidal Stripping of Gas, Taking away much of its Star Forming gas,well example is Messier90 and 4 more others found on Virgo Cluster Comet Galaxy is the farthest Jellyfish Galaxy catalouged ESO 137-001 is the Well Detailed Example
Dr Becky do you think you will eventually do a video on viscous stripping on your channel? The other three mechanisms make sense but viscous stripping sounds like it is difficult to visualise and I didn't find any videos of it on youtube when I searched.
Thank you very much for sharing your research and excitement with us. Understanding what I am seeing through my telescope really enhances not only my knowledge but also my awe. Sooooo cool !!! :) P.S. "probably a little bit of both" hahahahahahah LOL :) This really did make me LOL. :)
Books to elevate the laptop and screen, the age old permanent temporary solution 😁 An ergonomist actually told us at my office to elevate our screens with books or the like. They should make sure manufacturers makes the screens sufficiently adjustable instead.
I’m trying to understand how the emoji for “triumph” or “determination” at 7:41 relates to viscous stripping of galaxies... actually, I’m a little perplexed by *all* the anthropomorphic language. I understand using more relatable or “human scale” language when describing fundamentally alien phenomenon (creating a bunch of jargon terms does nothing to aid comprehension) but the language used seems to unnecessarily impose human values of aesthetic symmetry and purposeful construction onto purely physical phenomena. A spiral galaxy is in no way “better” than an elliptical, galaxies are under no obligation to maintain a particular shape nor to transform into another. I probably sound over-sensitive but I have seen first hand how anthropomorphic language relating to biological evolutionary processes can cloud rather than clarify human thinking, when people believe that the “purpose” of evolution has been to create ever more “superior” organisms *culminating* in humans. I worry that to think of spiral galaxies as the “best” type of galaxy is as harmful to rational scientific inquiry as to think Homo sapiens the “best” or “most evolved” type of animal.
My impression was that it's not the emotion the emoji represents that mattered in that case, but rather the air being blown out of the nose representing the outflow of gasses.
It's a delicate balance, but I think it improves clarity here. I doubt, for example, that people are going to start thinking of galaxies as triumphantly expelling their gas Evolution is a more 'human' thing, it relates directly to us ad our place in the world. Galaxies are more remote, even with touches of personification. I can see why the big concern is the names of the processes, they're definitely more likely to mislead with their violent undertones.
Could it be that m100 is simply much farther away and thus not influenced by the other galaxies? Maybe we are just THINKING it's part of the cluster 😉? I am sure the experts thought of this centuries ago and the distances are well established, but I was just thinking ...
Yes, that's essentially the idea. Early galaxies would have been comprised almost entirely of gas and stars. As those first generation of stars age they release dust grains from their atmosphere in the form of mostly silicates and carbon based compounds. Then as some of those stars go supernova, they form and then release a lot of dust which then gets spread throughout the galaxy and recycled into the next generation of stars, and on, and on.
18 remaining messier objects
M14 : Globular Cluster
M39 : Open Cluster
M47 : Open Cluster
M55 : Globular Cluster
M59 : Elliptical Galaxy
M61 : Spiral Galaxy
M69 : Globular Cluster
M72 : Globular Cluster
M80 : Globular Cluster
M81 : Spiral Galaxy Bode's Galaxy
M84 : Lenticular Galaxy,
M86 : Lenticular Galaxy,
M88 : Spiral Galaxy
M91 : Barred Spiral Galaxy,
M94 : Spiral Galaxy Cat's Eye Galaxy
M95 : Barred Spiral Galaxy,
M107: Globular Cluster
M108: Barred Spiral Galaxy,
1 Elliptical Galaxy
2 Lenticular Galaxy
3 Barred Spiral Galaxy
4 Spiral Galaxy
6 Globular Cluster
2 Open Cluster
They already did messier 81
I'm so happy to see a Deep sky videos upload featuring Dr Becky again!! I believe that DSV is how I found Dr. Becky's channel to begin with. Both get me beyond excited when I see new uploads! Thank you so much for the TOP NOTCH content friends!
Dr Becky is so good at explaining this stuff!
This is my favorite Messier object galaxy in this region of Coma Berenices. Saved one of the very best for nearly last! And so many supernovae!!!! I can’t wait to see the 6D map of this area so we can see the effect of ram pressure stripping and correlated motion in this cluster and supercluster. Looking forward to your award speech BTW. I wish I could see the universe played back like a movie, and watch all these described processes happening in real-time! Each galaxy is like a person, wearing the scars and history of their interactions with their fellows and their environment. We like the crow’s feet on the face of galaxies betraying hints of their life experience.
We really got lucky to have Dr Becky talk about her specialty. I think I need to watch this again to understand though.
Also worth mentioning that M100 is famous for the Hubble telescope comparison photos: one photo of it was a blurry picture taken by Hubble before its first orbital servicing mission, when the overbuffed side of the main mirror was preventing it from focusing well, & a second picture of the same spot in M100 after the servicing mission. The M100 comparison photo is probably the most often used pair of pictures that exemplifies how poor Hubble’s vision was prior to servicing & how much better it became after.
Deep sky videos and Dr Becky in my subscription feed, make coffee and viewing as soon as possible.
Funny you still had such a magnificent object left over, after all those years :)
The professor mentioned last episode that they purposely left some good things (or at least a higher percentage) for the end :)
Bonus Becky week again woohoo!!!
Becky is back!
Could this galaxy have 'jellyfished' but the gas trails are directly behind it out of view?
That's what I'm wondering. Is there different types of light or radiation coming from the jellyfish outflow that can be differentiated from the galaxy itself?
I think they could tell if stars were behind or in front of it based on redshift. Not sure if it works on distances that “small” but I’m confident they have some way of telling if it’s jellyfishy or not
Jellyfished Galaxies are Commonly found on Center of well crowded galaxy clusters...
The Jellyfished galaxies had been Developed from Tidal Stripping of Gas, Taking away much of its Star Forming gas,well example is Messier90 and 4 more others found on Virgo Cluster
Comet Galaxy is the farthest Jellyfish Galaxy catalouged
ESO 137-001 is the Well Detailed Example
I think that jellyfish trails have rapid starformn in them (emmitting UV which can be seen with UV telescopes !!!
Therefore they can check
Yes!!!!!! New DSV! Brady , make no mistake you're an essential worker!
I was kinda waiting for the singing and the bloopers.
Pavlov teehee
"Flocci" literally means "a shock of wool," As in the word "floccinaucinihilipilification"
This comment is worthless....
@@fewwiggle ya right
1:35 the centre of the galaxy resembles a witch standing over a glowing cauldron
So basically... You got gas? You're a star ! 😆😄
Raise your hand if you would watch a video where Dr. Becky talks about sheep.
The high rate of supernovas in it is probably also adding to quenching star formation.
Yes I wish they would do M39 such a nice cluster.
Such a magnificent galaxy!
Such a magnificent presenter for this magnificent galaxy!
Dr Becky do you think you will eventually do a video on viscous stripping on your channel? The other three mechanisms make sense but viscous stripping sounds like it is difficult to visualise and I didn't find any videos of it on youtube when I searched.
You're so great !! Thanks a lot :D
All I hear is gas, gas, gas and more gas. And happens to be I'm gasy right now 😄 Wait, so does that mean that galaxies fart a lot? 😭
11:38 "they could find safer places for the crown than on the head of a senior citizen"
lol
:) That episode is at: ruclips.net/video/ERY4FvZxyts/видео.html or Unmade Podcast on your podcast player
@@DeepSkyVideos ty :) :)
Beautiful!
Thank you very much for sharing your research and excitement with us. Understanding what I am seeing through my telescope really enhances not only my knowledge but also my awe. Sooooo cool !!! :)
P.S. "probably a little bit of both" hahahahahahah LOL :) This really did make me LOL. :)
Yay Dr. Becky!!
That title had me diving for the dictionary!
Now I don't know whether this is a crossover episode of DeeSkyVideos with Dr Becky or this is a normal video of the channel :0
Kind of normal in the more recent videos.
Love you mam.
Hats off for your efforts to popularize science globally.
There is no bar in the center...and there are plenty of single, non-interacting spirals in clusters...
Books to elevate the laptop and screen, the age old permanent temporary solution 😁 An ergonomist actually told us at my office to elevate our screens with books or the like. They should make sure manufacturers makes the screens sufficiently adjustable instead.
Who could possibly "dislike" this?! Are there flat-earthers in here, or some of those electric universe people or something?! Smh...
Close enough: "beh-reh-NEE-keh".
bɛ.rɛˈniː.keː
I’m trying to understand how the emoji for “triumph” or “determination” at 7:41 relates to viscous stripping of galaxies... actually, I’m a little perplexed by *all* the anthropomorphic language. I understand using more relatable or “human scale” language when describing fundamentally alien phenomenon (creating a bunch of jargon terms does nothing to aid comprehension) but the language used seems to unnecessarily impose human values of aesthetic symmetry and purposeful construction onto purely physical phenomena. A spiral galaxy is in no way “better” than an elliptical, galaxies are under no obligation to maintain a particular shape nor to transform into another.
I probably sound over-sensitive but I have seen first hand how anthropomorphic language relating to biological evolutionary processes can cloud rather than clarify human thinking, when people believe that the “purpose” of evolution has been to create ever more “superior” organisms *culminating* in humans. I worry that to think of spiral galaxies as the “best” type of galaxy is as harmful to rational scientific inquiry as to think Homo sapiens the “best” or “most evolved” type of animal.
Did they even say "better"/"superior"/whatever? I heard about galaxy "death"-the end of start formation-which is a different thing.
My impression was that it's not the emotion the emoji represents that mattered in that case, but rather the air being blown out of the nose representing the outflow of gasses.
It's a delicate balance, but I think it improves clarity here. I doubt, for example, that people are going to start thinking of galaxies as triumphantly expelling their gas Evolution is a more 'human' thing, it relates directly to us ad our place in the world. Galaxies are more remote, even with touches of personification. I can see why the big concern is the names of the processes, they're definitely more likely to mislead with their violent undertones.
imagine alien in m100 talking about milky way in their world
Is it just me that sees Dr Staphen Hawking's face in the top right of the Hubble photo of M100? :)
Dr Becky 😍
If the arms are pressure waves what causes the bar?
I swear I thought they were saying 'crayon' at the end there instead of 'crown'.
TF? How? How do you picture them stealing 'the crayon' instead of The Crown? You do lots of coloring in kindergarten today?
Unquenched Spiral Galaxy M100 ?
Can a galaxy suffer black holevation or globular clustervation or planetvation?
Could it be that m100 is simply much farther away and thus not influenced by the other galaxies? Maybe we are just THINKING it's part of the cluster 😉? I am sure the experts thought of this centuries ago and the distances are well established, but I was just thinking ...
How many Messier objects left to cover on this channel?
Only eighteen remain.
Is the "dust" essentially "ash" left by the burning in a star?
Yes, that's essentially the idea. Early galaxies would have been comprised almost entirely of gas and stars. As those first generation of stars age they release dust grains from their atmosphere in the form of mostly silicates and carbon based compounds. Then as some of those stars go supernova, they form and then release a lot of dust which then gets spread throughout the galaxy and recycled into the next generation of stars, and on, and on.
@@J_Cera This is fascinating--thank you so much for your informative reply! It was kind of you to take the time.
Nice
hell yeah. galaxies.
Hey, where are the bloppers and a song?
Wrong channel.
@@rhoddryice5412 I know. It just doesn't feel right.
Editing Becky probably has a well deserved day off.
Teaching to the lowest common denominator; listening is soooo tedious. I know what intra means.
Galactic domestic violence.
🤩🤩🤩♥️
Your hair is very flocculent today :)
Creep
hello!! : )
Hi.
o whey ,Dr climate emergency Becky
got the rona reading your comment
Dr Becky 😍