It’s funny how each one of us is basically the universe looking back at itself, yet we think we are “insignificant”. You are it, you are anything but insignificant.
@@ManiBalajiC thats why materialism lead to existential depression :D ... Even just by logic the most "fantastic" creation (by chance or by design) hardly can be call "insignificant" .
@@ManiBalajiC Small, but not insignificant. Otherwise, not one idea or statement would be worth considering or commenting on... insignificance can cover vast amounts of thought.
I'm confused how this "inflation material" can decay, yet never run out. He said the half that's left is much much larger due to expansion rates being more frequent than decaying rates, but that doesn't define endless. Not to mention, every time it decays into "normal matter", that matter now has gravity instead of repulsive capabilities. Everything I can find says inflation was a temporary phenomena as well, literally lasting only a few seconds after the big bang before giving way to hubble expansion instead. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that the local energy minimum (the only mechanism that allows for inflation to continue forever) must fluctuate, and that it would inevitably reach a lower vacuum state in the process. This would prevent endless inflation.
Our universe could be expanding into hyperspace interacting with virtual particles and those virtual particles decay rate is so brief we could never detect them. Yet we see the after effects of the decay. Expansion.
I remember reading Guth's theory in Scientific American some 40 years ago, and it blew my mind. Later I found out that nothing was expanding nor inflating but paradoxically inflation became an important piece in the puzzle that contributed greatly towards understanding The All. But I digress. The three clues that explain multi-universes is black holes, dimagnetism and the dancing Shiva - who would have thought?
One must have condensates of energy_to_mass down pat to know, how is a near-perfectly equal-opposite made in mechanics other than fluids which can throw pairs of a droplet of a charge entity with neutrinos galore about ? That is my assertion, a charge_fluid droplet exists under those conditions, it's not accounted for in the StdModel, it's a property of a particle. Ymmv 🍺
It seems to me that the term “multiple universes” is an oxymoron since the word “UNI-verse” implies one entity or concept which includes all other. So, if what was originated by the big bang constitutes the universe, all these other “universes” or “pocket universes” that are being discussed here owe their origin to the same big bang as well and therefore are elements of that same big-bang-originated universe. Perhaps we should call these elements “universe pockets” or “universe fragments” and what we live in should be called “our universe fragment”?
That definition of Universe implies that everything there is to exist already exists in this one Universe, which we currently cannot know. The Multiverse is much more plausible than skeptics believe it to be, I’d say it’s even inevitable.
It would be good if they discussed the reasoning of boundary between universes. How would one know when our universe ends and some other universe begins?
Inflation also doesn't state, that we are the first universe in some chain of universes. Just that we are a universe molded by C.I. I gather that scale in a universe is self referential. As such, successive U's aren't bigger, they just are. ie "Let size equal 1"
If the number of these universes is infinite as he says, then regardless of how small a fraction of them would turn out like ours with the possibility of advanced life, that number would also be infinite.
"Scientists really only understand about 5 percent of what the universe is made of".If that is the case then almost anything you can imagine is possible.Personally I hope the new James Web will open our tired eyes a bit more.
The universe is one. the reason is the words "tautology" and "uni". We will continue to learn more about the extent but there will always be something beyond that is there now or caused by something now.
This short discussion about a very extraordinary physics topic is remarkably clear and intellectually grasp able for even the common normal sized brain. Astonishing for sure..but believable as an extrapolation. What we know is vast..but what we don't know is infinitely more vast. What we can never know but only imagine..no words
What has given rise this mysterious material at high energy density in the first place which is getting bigger as the universe expands and remain eternally there?
Love to listen to Profesor A . Gluth. This idea of many universes Maybe there are many universes but we don’t live in Universe, maybe we live in the wast unimaginable space between Universes We know that what we see has a diameter of 92 billion light years, but no curvature, not even 1 degree. Maybe?,space in which universes are “ floating “ is perfectly cold, absolute 0. K. For a brief moment stuff was “pump” in from One of the universes wich like a black hole “ate to much “and had to get rid of excess stuff into infinit space. Space between universes is trying to get rid of this flu like problem ( temperature went up from absolute O to 1-3.K. Speed of galaxies 13 billion light from us almost moving with speed of light, matter will eventually become a light. Close to us, dark energy and dark matter is trying to bring visible matter into galaxies, eventually to dissolve through black holes, takes billions of years, but is not our time table. At the end perfect space with absolute perfect temperature O. K. Maybe this cycle is happening more often since one of the mathematician predicted 500 hundred trylion universes 👀
My respect for Einstein is growing with each new idea popular scientists come up with, simply because man set at least some limits to those cosmological fairy tales. They try to break speed of light limit also, some crack pots invented faster than light travel of mass because they didn't know how to explain uniformity of space objects otherwise. It started with Hubble, who used Doppler effect principle on light captured by telescopes and noticed galaxies are moving away from each other, with increased acceleration from expanding space-time. Then they used radio telescopes and find limits of how far we can see, it appears everything is submerged into some kind of microwave background noise. They researched further and realized there's a wall around all the galaxies we can see, in a form of some sort of energetic fluctuations, making patches of nothing radiate slightly different temperatures. So they figured out this heat must come before any other matter was created and caused all that stuff to inflate around us. Now, how could that be, at first they proposed an idea that was the most like religious BS fairy tale of creation, except they didn't call it the first day when God decided to actually build something, they used the more punchy word Big bang instead. Hoping nobody will notice similarity with Genesis and ask stupid questions, like why was that and why is that, nobody knows anything anyway. Inflation is only one of those ideas, each one has in build one or another fundamental flaw, forcing theoretical scientist to invent some kind of magical phenomena, like faster than light motion in Big bang model or antigravity in inflation. None of those was ever observed in reality, and there are no theoretical foundations for their existence. It's a make believe game, they compete who will come up with more exciting and interesting idea, not real theoretical physics, based on only what really exist out there and can be confirmed by anybody. So we are far away from any useful model, can't explain what we can observe as is, nobody ordered even more universes.
This really reminds me of the maha-vishnu conception of the universe in Hinduism which states that the transcendental entity is in a dream like sleep in the causal ocean, breathing out universes from the pores of its body. Much like the inflation of multiple universes! An interesting coincidence. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahavishnu
Imagine being in a packed movie theater. There is a single reality being experienced by many consciousnesses. In THIS divine movie/simulation, there is a singular(ity) consciousness experiencing many realities. So in this model, every sentient life is itself a realm/world. So the multiple universes are all present here. Occam would approve. That which is looking through those eyes is that which is looking through these eyes...
In a nut shell, I believe that as infinite as our universe is, there are inner and outer universes Beyond numbers. I like to think all the above are within a living one.
If we understand the language used to describe quantum mechanics etc. we understand what they are. But we don't so we can't. A scientist in frock with his name tag on it's pocket is looking through the most powerful microscope possible. He sees a scientist in a frock with his name tag on it's pocket looking through . . . It is the essence of "animism." What earliest hominids lived.
Why do the different pocket universes not collide ? Why has ours not collided ? It certainly seems plausible given that each pocket Universe might also probably be expanding at a rapid rate, and the base material of those pocket universes were proximal initially?
No, quantum formalism forbids decision between the different reformulations, they all generate same empirical results! You begin to understand quantum world, if you think all reformulations together, because they all have the special gap just moved to another position!
Maybe it's like every new bubble universe is just a decay into a lower vacuum state. The new lower vacuum state universe expands at the speed of light like a bubble. The universe we know is growing faster than the speed of light over large distances due to dark energy making the vacuum decay part (if its outside our observable sphere) unable to swallow up our part of the universe fast enough to destroy it. maybe there are many vacuum decays already happening, creating new big bangs within our known universe, already, and maybe ours was created out of another with a higher vacuum state in the same way. I haven't factored in exponential expansion though, as vacuum decay is supposed to only expand at the speed of light. Maybe there are lots of lowest vacuum levels and at some point the process reaches the lowest level and the whole inflation epoch runs out of energy?
David Adair met Steven Hawking at a symposium at Ohio State University, and saw an error in one of Steven’s formulas. David is now heading up the current Middle Eastern Space Program !
I believe we die at an increasingly rapid rate, once we figure out how to stop this we will figure out all pocket universe and everything else relating to space and time. The saddest thing is we can't stop time nor our bodies aging so one day, all of us who were here will be gone, it's sad to know this and I don't get people that say yay I am happy I won't live forever.
The multiverse idea came from a debate at Oxford where an atheist scientist couldn’t refute the argument of origins of life put forth by his ID(intelligent design) opponent. so he said, Well, if there were enough universes then that could explain it. No science, just a crazy whim off the top of his head.
I have always understood the word "universe" to mean: "everything that exists". In which case, by definition, you can have only one; you can't have two or more sets of "everything that exists". So I always get hung up on the semantics of theories of multiple universes. What does the word even mean in this context? What is a universe, then, if it is not everything that exists? Multiple "universes" are just members of the "everything that exists" sense of "universe", so why not just give them a different name, to avoid confusion? I don't even know what is being talked about when they talk about multiple universes, and nobody ever seems to give it a specific definition.
@@alfredomartinez3041 no I love good theory’s and hypothesis’s, it’s interesting. I wasn’t aware that we had a final theory of everything or maybe I wouldn’t like some of the good theory’s/hypothesis’s put out there by educated people.
@@alanbrady420 I dont fully understand your reply. I respect your desire for knowledge but it may be that it will take more time for us to truly understand the origins of matter. At the meantime...lets not settle for make believe theories disguised as science.
@@alfredomartinez3041 I’m not saying I’m settled on the idea, I’m merely saying I like it and it does makes sense for some of the things that we cannot see or explain. I’m not dead set on it but I do however like what it brings to the table. It’s all good Alfredo, I do like the idea of lots of different theories too that’s all’s I’m saying. Nothing is final in my thinking about the way things work unless fully proven and that’s why I’m interested. People believe in religion and that’s settling for a make believe god hypothesis but each to their own buddy. We are all individual’s with different points of views on all kinds of different matters, but I do like to keep an open mind that any of the things mentioned could be true but we’ll probably never fully know the answers unfortunately.
When we think universe can adjust in pocket it all about imagination. Reality is in front of us. Imagination areas are more in infinitely universe. In infinity universe if we imagine this visible universe is also can adjusts in pocket in imagination Even non viable universe also go on same in imagination.
Yeah, but because of inflation it isn’t necessarily the case that it is infinite, could just be truly immense or it could be flat but bounded if the geometry isn’t trivial.
Are we need another universes? I think for us, our galaxy is more that an universe, if we are able to discover 5% of it, will be great! Why speculate, when the reality it's more than we can imagine?!
Our universe had a beginning. There must have been universes before ours. There's no space and time outside the universe. Our universe appeared for no reason, then. Random event! There must exist right now other universes besides ours, then.
Whay they are describing here would be a level 1 multiverse. Theoretically, there could be 4 levels with each higher level containing the lower levels. Now wrap your head around that.
His theory may be eternally unprovable and of no use, but at least he's saves us from the idea of a First Cause. A Big Banger. Once again, the universe is all there is, all there ever was, and all there ever will be. So what happened to the idea that an effect must have a sufficient cause? You still haven't explained where all of the information in the universes comes from? Infinite die rolling infinite improbabilities accumulating all possible information randomly. Yeah. Sure. HO.K. Youbetcha!
So the multiverse springs from the original big bang? This is the same as saying the galaxies become their own universes because they will be so far from each other in the future.
In both cases that'd be just crass logicistical reductionism. The universe is not only very, very big, great, biggreat, huge, giant, hugiantly humongous, colossal, it's greatly diverse as well, and it even has this thing called "time" that is a constant coming to being of new forms (eidé, as some greek philosophers called them). The human mind is kind of allergic to such vastness and diversity, the sheer size of the universe or multiverse frightens the mind, the mind then appeals to this reductionist deterministic logic of the "same": it's always the same, the same electron, the same point in different places, the same graviton, the same self, the world and the mind are the same, as childish idealism babbles up etc. But the real reality has never signed any contract to obey or satisfy any manias or wishes of frightened little minds: real has many regions and provinces of being, each one maybe requiring its own logics and onthologics, there's no guarantee of sameness around us in the universe, lone electron or graviton theories are but childish phantasies!
MW, cool question. Wheeler suggested to Feynman that maybe there could be a coherent theory with just 1 electron, but extrapolating, could there be a coherent qed-style theory with just 1 generalized particle, moving arbitrarily in time, instantiating *all* particle interactions? (I presume the answer is yes. And I presume J Wheeler must have considered it.)
@@mangalvnam2010 In other words, you just wanted to get that out in order to deride the great Wheeler. You have not got any letters after your name have you: I have MIT.
@@michaelwhalan9783 No, sir, me ain't got no letters "after" my name, but just IN it. I have knowledge, I do research, I study and learn philosphy of science, I do not support what I say with arbitrary pieces of papers saying I am this or that or decreeing my supposed smartness. Lone particle theories, wherever they come from, either Hegel, Plato or Wheeler, or even Einstein, is philosophically and onthologically equivalent to negate time, this stubborn obsession of die-hard idealism and of the ensidic tedious logics of determinacy. It's similar to Newton's astrological maps...
Consider the Sternglass-Einstein work on the electron-positron pair in a death spiral since being created in the first condensates of matter after a Bang. From that structure paired with another counter-rotating pair was found a meson matching properties in lab results. The implications of this finding, late 50's, which was never disproven although disputed vs the "Copenhagen School", are immense to theory & help explain a portion of 'dark matter' by virtue of their external neutral charge as a single pair. And, when they finally decay their energy of annihilation is released, this can explain a portion of inflation, and dark_energy. Thus, the Standard Model while coherent to itself isn't a theory being an empirically derived system. In a cellular universe there were more than one Bang, material was there before & a portion, affected and unaffected by the explosion remains mixed in with the results of a Bang. That is, a Bang converts mass to energy that is sent quickly away from the center of mass outward as energy, thus removing most of the gathered mass as an Attractor. All masses being drawn by a Great Attractor are suddenly free to take altered trajectories as a way to distinguish objects released from the loss in mass so quickly. Consider if this didn't happen all the Universe would be only Great Attractors gobbling each other, this cellular, multiverse theory. Then, as first condensates after a bang how to create pairs? When pairs decay later in expansion they release the energy_of_annihilation after being externally neutral in charge. This leads to needing a quantum, low-viscosity charge_fluid droplet to be struck by neutrinos to spin off the these pairs as primary "particles", noting they are from a fluid. The energy_of_annihilation subtracted from that of the neutrino should be a known particle, if so a strong support for theory, and, should model nicely. Ymmv.
Nice work but in real world things never seem to work the way we plan in advance ,we always latter learn that more need to be understood to find the proper balance . Universe modeled as a perpetuum mobile function is lacking on many aspects but more things may lay out in plain site , yet no one sees them .
@@rovidius2006 The point by the Sternglass-Einstein work that the real world is made up of charge entities in various states, if you spilt charge it takes energy, when the opposites collide that energy is released. A lot more "particles" tied to orbitals are needed to identify all the ways this works. Another view that gravity is a fluid that transmits forces yet isn't one. Cheers, 🍺
@@ttmallard Indeed a lot more is needed ,but for humans there is only so much that can be had just like with cows or other beings ,there is a biological limit for all .Don't ask me how i know..
@@rovidius2006 Not sure what that means, yet mammals can survive up to 200ppm of hydrogen-sulfide in surviving the asteroid hit & PETM extinctions, our next in about 3.5ky-5ky away with BAU using fossil_fuels by past results. Cheers 🍺
@@ttmallard Do to our limited size brain ,can we extrapolate our chances to understand more than 1% of the informational load imbedded in the universe around us ?We dont know how much we dont know but we could calculate our potential abilities . If dont think of it great areas may pass unnoticed .
there's no start, the mind cannot grasp that. We're conditioned to a causal world, but in the timeless realm, the idea of causality is what's ungraspable. And btw, a delayed happy anniversary to you, that's my birthday too. But I'm a little bit younger...
@@RogerioLupoArteCientifica Really? There's no start? Then WHAT is the event that has been continously occurring into the infinite past? WHAT expands in this model? 20july1944 is the date of the bomb plot against Hitler, not my birthday.
@@RogerioLupoArteCientifica If there's no start or beginning then that implies an eternal universe and if that's true how are we here now when there's an eternal past?
Does your “nothing” have physical laws? Time? Cause and effect? By definition it can’t, right? So what would stop inflation from starting? (On a side note, inflationists believe that all it takes to kick this off is a “quantum fluctuation”. This was covered in other videos on the channel with Guth and others.)
@@hckytwn3192 OK, a quantum fluctuation started the inflation. I'm always looking for nouns in these statements. Had the quantum field that fluctuated always existed without fluctuations prior to that, into the infinite past?
We understand < 5% of the universe. How can one theory based on 4% give all these ‘multiverse plausibilities’ and a scientist a confidence level of 75%? Appears ‘closer to science fiction’.
For there to be multiverse there wud be more than one big bangs. So long as there is no another universes or big bangs are observed then it is just a speculations or theories...or like darwin theory it is just a bed time stories
There was no "big bang." The universe is eternal and never ending - something humans cannot grasp. It's hilarious to me that some people feel/think they know so much about the universe and yet they cannot explain things that happen here on earth in real time.
"So what's new in the world of physics?" "Nothing." "Really? Nothing?" "Well. With the exception of String Theory not much has happened since the 1930s. And you can't prove String Theory. At best you can say, "Hey, look! My idea has an internal logical consistency!" "Ahhh! Well, I'm sure things will pick up." ruclips.net/video/L-oAYnasuSM/видео.html
Is he basically saying there was only one big bang? And that "pocket universes" are born from it? That doesn't sound very multiversy to me. If one big bang can happen, why not others?
If I'm not wrong, wich is very posible that i'm wrong 🤣😂 The String theory propose atleast 10 dimensions, 11, or 26, we live in a 3Dimension world, well 4 dimension world length, width, height and time, which conforms the space-time, that it's expanding, and also bendable (gravitacional waves) those 3 spatial dimensions and time are fused in our daily reality, there's nothing just made of 1 or 2 spatial dimensions, or out of time, all the mater that we can see and observe is represented for ours the observers in this theater of 4 dimensions, so they only exist as geometric mathematical abstractions, if we asume that this assumptions about dimension are true, and we assume the ideal count of dimensions making the first one of this 10,11,26 posibles, the 1 dimension of our 3 spatial dimension world and time, and we theorize that the responsable for the inflation is the "inflaton" a theoric particle, and also think about the duality particle/wave or particle/string I imagine that all the quantum physics, that have diferent physics compared to the regular ones, have a origin on the 2 dimension, because waves only have length, and height, they can be represented as a bidimensional scheme, but this second dimension isn't isolated from the first one and the third one, and also time, so this waves can form wave fields, which extent in the 3 directions across time, but their original geometrical nature is 2 Dimension reality, or atleast is what I think, but thanks to that fuse of this pack of dimensions we can see their effects and movement across the 3 dimensions, for example emiting radio waves, but when you try to figure out the momentum and the position and the nature, observe the particle that forms the wave, the observator force this pack of dimensions to give the wave, or the wave field a concrete determined and geometrical nature of 3 dimension and time which it's called particle, foton, electron, proton, neutron... This nature it's more natural for us to observe and more intuitive, than the quantum wave field, because has been forced by our technology to be observed in our bigger scales, of space-time, so it adquires big part of the qualities of the regular matter and ligth that we can see everyday, that are big associations of this particles, with different physic natures, but isolated and amplified so much times the zoom. If the responsable for the inflation it's the hipotetic particle "inflaton" it will have also a wavefield nature originally, which means that inferior dimensions construct bigger ones, so maybe the expansion is that much bigger and exponential, and even than the light speed, because it has to create much more bigger dimensions that now doesn't exist, the same as our pack of 4 dimensions doesn't exist before "Big Bang" maybe they will pack our 4 dimensions, or maybe will create new ones independent from this, don't know, but maybe the 5 dimension and above will have different type of physics, product of the nature of our 4 ones, with a much bigger scale, and the limit of this 4 and the 5 will be, the contrary to the planck length, the most bigger size of 3 dimensional space-time posible before physics changes again, so one day maybe a inteligent living thing from that higer dimension find a form to observe our dimension, and see our galaxyes and think: oh wow theres a lot of particles down there, while observing and measuring our galaxyes, or maybe the "macrophysics" of that dimensions generate a reality pretty different that not gonna make happen something like this, but other will happen, I make to much assumptions, so true will be millions times more complex and different, but I like to think about that, I'm not so good at mathematic calculations but i'm trying 😂🤣😂🤣 (sorry for the bad english is not my native language)
I really like Alan Guth. He's humble and willing to share his ideas without being pompous.
he looks like Clark Kent. Imagine him without glasses.
It's hard enough to find humble men among us ordinary mortals.
For a great genius like him to be humble is truly inspiring.
He explains things very well. I wish I had him in school
Yay, another installment of Closer To Guth
Amazing. Just when you think you are tiny and unimportant - you discover how truly insignificant you really are.
It's always the case, small and insignificant.
How dare you!!!!!! You are sleeping beauty dears...but you are great
It’s funny how each one of us is basically the universe looking back at itself, yet we think we are “insignificant”. You are it, you are anything but insignificant.
@@ManiBalajiC thats why materialism lead to existential depression :D ... Even just by logic the most "fantastic" creation (by chance or by design) hardly can be call "insignificant" .
@@ManiBalajiC Small, but not insignificant. Otherwise, not one idea or statement would be worth considering or commenting on... insignificance can cover vast amounts of thought.
If everyone has a unique perspective of the Universe then each perspective is a separate universe.
Like 7.7 billion different Gods.
Great thought
@ Creating an overlay of a Venn diagram.... 😁
so is tought itself a universe or a dimension of our universe?
No because you and everything is the universe
Best channel on the tubes 🤓
Alan Guth is so smart it's nice he is trying to dumb things down to make it easier to understand for everyday people.
Life would be tragic if it weren't funny- Stephen Hawking.
What is the first thing to exist, in whatever model you hold?
If I were to ask God what is ‘his’ favorite joke, ‘he’ would probably reply: “Life”.
@@Bassotronics There's even better joke, God committed suicide on a cross.
@@xspotbox4400
I thought that was Jesus ‘his’ ‘son’, not God.
@@Bassotronics if one takes their own life, you don’t get a ticket to heaven, or is it different rules for family members?
Very interesting and worthwhile video.
I'm confused how this "inflation material" can decay, yet never run out. He said the half that's left is much much larger due to expansion rates being more frequent than decaying rates, but that doesn't define endless. Not to mention, every time it decays into "normal matter", that matter now has gravity instead of repulsive capabilities. Everything I can find says inflation was a temporary phenomena as well, literally lasting only a few seconds after the big bang before giving way to hubble expansion instead. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that the local energy minimum (the only mechanism that allows for inflation to continue forever) must fluctuate, and that it would inevitably reach a lower vacuum state in the process. This would prevent endless inflation.
Make sure Mr. Guth is aware of your supposition.
Our universe could be expanding into hyperspace interacting with virtual particles and those virtual particles decay rate is so brief we could never detect them. Yet we see the after effects of the decay. Expansion.
Just hand the joint back to me please...
These guys are trying to tackle the questions that seem to be at the core of the matter. And that in itself is astounding to me.
We are all trying to tackle that question, in our own ways.
I remember reading Guth's theory in Scientific American some 40 years ago, and it blew my mind. Later I found out that nothing was expanding nor inflating but paradoxically inflation became an important piece in the puzzle that contributed greatly towards understanding The All.
But I digress.
The three clues that explain multi-universes is black holes, dimagnetism and the dancing Shiva - who would have thought?
One must have condensates of energy_to_mass down pat to know, how is a near-perfectly equal-opposite made in mechanics other than fluids which can throw pairs of a droplet of a charge entity with neutrinos galore about ?
That is my assertion, a charge_fluid droplet exists under those conditions, it's not accounted for in the StdModel, it's a property of a particle.
Ymmv 🍺
It seems to me that the term “multiple universes” is an oxymoron since the word “UNI-verse” implies one entity or concept which includes all other. So, if what was originated by the big bang constitutes the universe, all these other “universes” or “pocket universes” that are being discussed here owe their origin to the same big bang as well and therefore are elements of that same big-bang-originated universe. Perhaps we should call these elements “universe pockets” or “universe fragments” and what we live in should be called “our universe fragment”?
Multiverse has a ring to it.
This despite the fact that we no not all dimensions of the apparent universe.
white picket fences separate the universes ...
That definition of Universe implies that everything there is to exist already exists in this one Universe, which we currently cannot know. The Multiverse is much more plausible than skeptics believe it to be, I’d say it’s even inevitable.
It would be good if they discussed the reasoning of boundary between universes. How would one know when our universe ends and some other universe begins?
Inflation also doesn't state, that we are the first universe in some chain of universes. Just that we are a universe molded by C.I. I gather that scale in a universe is self referential. As such, successive U's aren't bigger, they just are.
ie "Let size equal 1"
We appear to live in a reality that is vast beyond vast beyond vast.
And vastness is multiplying, mind boggling.
And in complexity.
If the number of these universes is infinite as he says, then regardless of how small a fraction of them would turn out like ours with the possibility of advanced life, that number would also be infinite.
Mathematics says the same. Beautifully explained!!
"Scientists really only understand about 5 percent of what the universe is made of".If that is the case then almost anything you can imagine is possible.Personally I hope the new James Web will open our tired eyes a bit more.
The universe is one. the reason is the words "tautology" and "uni". We will continue to learn more about the extent but there will always be something beyond that is there now or caused by something now.
This short discussion about a very extraordinary physics topic is remarkably clear and intellectually grasp able for even the common normal sized brain. Astonishing for sure..but believable as an extrapolation. What we know is vast..but what we don't know is infinitely more vast. What we can never know but only imagine..no words
Not really. Not my brain.
What has given rise this mysterious material at high energy density in the first place which is getting bigger as the universe expands and remain eternally there?
5:06 " that sounds ridiculous" lol I love theoretical physicists. They have the best models to come up with extravagant explanations
Alan looks like he is from 1960 and Robert looks like he's from 2060.
In an alternate universe, it will be the other way around !
@@shinymike4301 Not necessarily.
@@budweiser600 That's true.
It's funny you say that because when they zoom in on Guth, he starts to resemble a 70s version of Luke Skywalker.
Looks like I stumbled upon the channel I've always wanted to subscribe to
Of course there are multiple universes, we all create all our own universes
Love to listen to Profesor A . Gluth.
This idea of many universes
Maybe there are many universes but we don’t live in Universe, maybe we live in the wast unimaginable space between Universes
We know that what we see has a diameter of 92 billion light years, but no curvature, not even 1 degree.
Maybe?,space in which universes are “ floating “ is perfectly cold, absolute 0. K. For a brief moment stuff was “pump” in from One of the universes wich like a black hole “ate to much “and had to get rid of excess stuff into infinit space.
Space between universes is trying to get rid of this flu like problem ( temperature went up from absolute O to 1-3.K. Speed of galaxies 13 billion light from us almost moving with speed of light, matter will eventually become a light.
Close to us, dark energy and dark matter is trying to bring visible matter into galaxies, eventually to dissolve through black holes, takes billions of years, but is not our time table. At the end perfect space with absolute perfect temperature O. K.
Maybe this cycle is happening more often since one of the mathematician predicted 500 hundred trylion universes 👀
Free education. Thank you.
My respect for Einstein is growing with each new idea popular scientists come up with, simply because man set at least some limits to those cosmological fairy tales. They try to break speed of light limit also, some crack pots invented faster than light travel of mass because they didn't know how to explain uniformity of space objects otherwise.
It started with Hubble, who used Doppler effect principle on light captured by telescopes and noticed galaxies are moving away from each other, with increased acceleration from expanding space-time. Then they used radio telescopes and find limits of how far we can see, it appears everything is submerged into some kind of microwave background noise. They researched further and realized there's a wall around all the galaxies we can see, in a form of some sort of energetic fluctuations, making patches of nothing radiate slightly different temperatures. So they figured out this heat must come before any other matter was created and caused all that stuff to inflate around us.
Now, how could that be, at first they proposed an idea that was the most like religious BS fairy tale of creation, except they didn't call it the first day when God decided to actually build something, they used the more punchy word Big bang instead. Hoping nobody will notice similarity with Genesis and ask stupid questions, like why was that and why is that, nobody knows anything anyway.
Inflation is only one of those ideas, each one has in build one or another fundamental flaw, forcing theoretical scientist to invent some kind of magical phenomena, like faster than light motion in Big bang model or antigravity in inflation. None of those was ever observed in reality, and there are no theoretical foundations for their existence. It's a make believe game, they compete who will come up with more exciting and interesting idea, not real theoretical physics, based on only what really exist out there and can be confirmed by anybody.
So we are far away from any useful model, can't explain what we can observe as is, nobody ordered even more universes.
This really reminds me of the maha-vishnu conception of the universe in Hinduism which states that the transcendental entity is in a dream like sleep in the causal ocean, breathing out universes from the pores of its body. Much like the inflation of multiple universes! An interesting coincidence. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahavishnu
The culture of India has been fascinating me lately. There are so many of these, “coincidences” in their culture(s)
Yes. Lots of them. They are like bubbles on ocean of consciousness
Imagine being in a packed movie theater. There is a single reality being experienced by many consciousnesses.
In THIS divine movie/simulation, there is a singular(ity) consciousness experiencing many realities. So in this model, every sentient life is itself a realm/world. So the multiple universes are all present here. Occam would approve.
That which is looking through those eyes is that which is looking through these eyes...
yeah that giant rotating sculpture isn't distracting at all.
Always have to ask this.... What's the PRACTICAL use of this information? Or is it just to KNOW about it?
Is the Copernican principle a good reason to consider that multiple universes exist? That this universe is not the center of cosmological existence?
What are the implications of inflation doubling over time? Is the energy of inflation related to time?
In a nut shell, I believe that as infinite as our universe is, there are inner and outer universes
Beyond numbers. I like to think all the above are within a living one.
Awesome......
If we understand the language used to describe quantum mechanics etc. we understand what they are. But we don't so we can't.
A scientist in frock with his name tag on it's pocket is looking through the most powerful microscope possible. He sees a scientist in a frock with his name tag on it's pocket looking through . . .
It is the essence of "animism." What earliest hominids lived.
Why do the different pocket universes not collide ? Why has ours not collided ? It certainly seems plausible given that each pocket Universe might also probably be expanding at a rapid rate, and the base material of those pocket universes were proximal initially?
Yes there are. And each of them contains a version of myself that's just as miserable as the one that's contained in this one.
Haha...how funny and sad
Lmao
The big bang, then you're a dad
The more I learn, specially about quantum physics, the more I feel we're in a simulation.
We are.
The brain definitely interprets reality in a way that sure does seem like a simulation
Weed helps this I find 😵💫
No, quantum formalism forbids decision between the different reformulations, they all generate same empirical results! You begin to understand quantum world, if you think all reformulations together, because they all have the special gap just moved to another position!
Maybe it's like every new bubble universe is just a decay into a lower vacuum state. The new lower vacuum state universe expands at the speed of light like a bubble. The universe we know is growing faster than the speed of light over large distances due to dark energy making the vacuum decay part (if its outside our observable sphere) unable to swallow up our part of the universe fast enough to destroy it. maybe there are many vacuum decays already happening, creating new big bangs within our known universe, already, and maybe ours was created out of another with a higher vacuum state in the same way. I haven't factored in exponential expansion though, as vacuum decay is supposed to only expand at the speed of light. Maybe there are lots of lowest vacuum levels and at some point the process reaches the lowest level and the whole inflation epoch runs out of energy?
David Adair met Steven Hawking at a symposium at Ohio State University, and saw an error in one of Steven’s formulas. David is now heading up the current Middle Eastern Space Program !
Of course, all at the same time in the Universe. Choose
I believe we die at an increasingly rapid rate, once we figure out how to stop this we will figure out all pocket universe and everything else relating to space and time. The saddest thing is we can't stop time nor our bodies aging so one day, all of us who were here will be gone, it's sad to know this and I don't get people that say yay I am happy I won't live forever.
The multiverse idea came from a debate at Oxford where an atheist scientist couldn’t refute the argument of origins of life put forth by his ID(intelligent design) opponent. so he said, Well, if there were enough universes then that could explain it. No science, just a crazy whim off the top of his head.
I have always understood the word "universe" to mean: "everything that exists". In which case, by definition, you can have only one; you can't have two or more sets of "everything that exists". So I always get hung up on the semantics of theories of multiple universes.
What does the word even mean in this context? What is a universe, then, if it is not everything that exists? Multiple "universes" are just members of the "everything that exists" sense of "universe", so why not just give them a different name, to avoid confusion? I don't even know what is being talked about when they talk about multiple universes, and nobody ever seems to give it a specific definition.
Love this theory it’s so mind blowing.
You must also love science fiction
@@alfredomartinez3041 no I love good theory’s and hypothesis’s, it’s interesting. I wasn’t aware that we had a final theory of everything or maybe I wouldn’t like some of the good theory’s/hypothesis’s put out there by educated people.
@@alanbrady420 I dont fully understand your reply. I respect your desire for knowledge but it may be that it will take more time for us to truly understand the origins of matter. At the meantime...lets not settle for make believe theories disguised as science.
@@alfredomartinez3041 I’m not saying I’m settled on the idea, I’m merely saying I like it and it does makes sense for some of the things that we cannot see or explain. I’m not dead set on it but I do however like what it brings to the table. It’s all good Alfredo, I do like the idea of lots of different theories too that’s all’s I’m saying. Nothing is final in my thinking about the way things work unless fully proven and that’s why I’m interested. People believe in religion and that’s settling for a make believe god hypothesis but each to their own buddy. We are all individual’s with different points of views on all kinds of different matters, but I do like to keep an open mind that any of the things mentioned could be true but we’ll probably never fully know the answers unfortunately.
@@alfredomartinez3041 what’s your magical cut-off between a legit theory and a make believe one?
Can the energy of inflation and how much energy went into this universe be measured, calculated or estimated?
Great content, high quality ideas, most likely all true
What reason do we have for believing that this is the only universe?
When we think universe can adjust in pocket it all about imagination.
Reality is in front of us.
Imagination areas are more in infinitely universe.
In infinity universe if we imagine this visible universe is also can adjusts in pocket in imagination
Even non viable universe also go on same in imagination.
Usually I can understand these types of videos but this particular one seems extremely convoluted and very difficult to understand.
Does the region of space with the inflatron field have to be infinite? What if the region was bounded in a higher dimension?
Being infinite in dimensions we can observe makes it plausible it can be others too
Yeah, but because of inflation it isn’t necessarily the case that it is infinite, could just be truly immense or it could be flat but bounded if the geometry isn’t trivial.
Are we need another universes? I think for us, our galaxy is more that an universe, if we are able to discover 5% of it, will be great! Why speculate, when the reality it's more than we can imagine?!
Our universe had a beginning. There must have been universes before ours. There's no space and time outside the universe. Our universe appeared for no reason, then. Random event! There must exist right now other universes besides ours, then.
Whay they are describing here would be a level 1 multiverse. Theoretically, there could be 4 levels with each higher level containing the lower levels.
Now wrap your head around that.
Guth 👍
Great. Now my admiration of Guth has turned into a full-on crush.
Where are these pocket universes and what separates them from each other? A boundary?
maybe in another multiverse he has the most amazing haircut ever
His theory may be eternally unprovable and of no use, but at least he's saves us from the idea of a First Cause. A Big Banger.
Once again, the universe is all there is, all there ever was, and all there ever will be.
So what happened to the idea that an effect must have a sufficient cause? You still haven't explained where all of the information in the universes comes from? Infinite die rolling infinite improbabilities accumulating all possible information randomly.
Yeah. Sure. HO.K. Youbetcha!
A multiverse could belie a subatomic particles that protect against inflationary expansion rates.
Can we stop focusing on things that we can't see, and start focusing on things that we can see.
Ok, get into the occult
so australia isn't there just because you can't see it from here.
how are we supposed to get to these other universes physically?
@антон тхір
yes but lack of proof doesn't mean it is silly.
into what space is expanding 🤔
Quality conversations.. Hot damn! The chance to hear it from the mofos mouths... Thank you internet and f the haters!
The wheel may have many spokes but it's still a wheel!
I want to see Alan and Eric Weinstein talk for a few hours on theoretical physics.
Yes, there are.
If there are multiple universes, then inflation energy between universes? Perhaps even time between inflation energies?
At last...some good audio.
So the multiverse springs from the original big bang? This is the same as saying the galaxies become their own universes because they will be so far from each other in the future.
There is a one electron theory: what if there's only one graviton in all the multiverse?
Hey Michael; do you live in AZ by any chance?
In both cases that'd be just crass logicistical reductionism. The universe is not only very, very big, great, biggreat, huge, giant, hugiantly humongous, colossal, it's greatly diverse as well, and it even has this thing called "time" that is a constant coming to being of new forms (eidé, as some greek philosophers called them). The human mind is kind of allergic to such vastness and diversity, the sheer size of the universe or multiverse frightens the mind, the mind then appeals to this reductionist deterministic logic of the "same": it's always the same, the same electron, the same point in different places, the same graviton, the same self, the world and the mind are the same, as childish idealism babbles up etc. But the real reality has never signed any contract to obey or satisfy any manias or wishes of frightened little minds: real has many regions and provinces of being, each one maybe requiring its own logics and onthologics, there's no guarantee of sameness around us in the universe, lone electron or graviton theories are but childish phantasies!
MW, cool question. Wheeler suggested to Feynman that maybe there could be a coherent theory with just 1 electron, but extrapolating, could there be a coherent qed-style theory with just 1 generalized particle, moving arbitrarily in time, instantiating *all* particle interactions? (I presume the answer is yes. And I presume J Wheeler must have considered it.)
@@mangalvnam2010 In other words, you just wanted to get that out in order to deride the great Wheeler. You have not got any letters after your name have you: I have MIT.
@@michaelwhalan9783 No, sir, me ain't got no letters "after" my name, but just IN it. I have knowledge, I do research, I study and learn philosphy of science, I do not support what I say with arbitrary pieces of papers saying I am this or that or decreeing my supposed smartness. Lone particle theories, wherever they come from, either Hegel, Plato or Wheeler, or even Einstein, is philosophically and onthologically equivalent to negate time, this stubborn obsession of die-hard idealism and of the ensidic tedious logics of determinacy. It's similar to Newton's astrological maps...
Consider the Sternglass-Einstein work on the electron-positron pair in a death spiral since being created in the first condensates of matter after a Bang.
From that structure paired with another counter-rotating pair was found a meson matching properties in lab results.
The implications of this finding, late 50's, which was never disproven although disputed vs the "Copenhagen School", are immense to theory & help explain a portion of 'dark matter' by virtue of their external neutral charge as a single pair.
And, when they finally decay their energy of annihilation is released, this can explain a portion of inflation, and dark_energy.
Thus, the Standard Model while coherent to itself isn't a theory being an empirically derived system.
In a cellular universe there were more than one Bang, material was there before & a portion, affected and unaffected by the explosion remains mixed in with the results of a Bang.
That is, a Bang converts mass to energy that is sent quickly away from the center of mass outward as energy, thus removing most of the gathered mass as an Attractor.
All masses being drawn by a Great Attractor are suddenly free to take altered trajectories as a way to distinguish objects released from the loss in mass so quickly.
Consider if this didn't happen all the Universe would be only Great Attractors gobbling each other, this cellular, multiverse theory.
Then, as first condensates after a bang how to create pairs?
When pairs decay later in expansion they release the energy_of_annihilation after being externally neutral in charge. This leads to needing a quantum, low-viscosity charge_fluid droplet to be struck by neutrinos to spin off the these pairs as primary "particles", noting they are from a fluid.
The energy_of_annihilation subtracted from that of the neutrino should be a known particle, if so a strong support for theory, and, should model nicely.
Ymmv.
Nice work but in real world things never seem to work the way we plan in advance ,we always latter learn that more need to be understood to find the proper balance . Universe modeled as a perpetuum mobile function is lacking on many aspects but more things may lay out in plain site , yet no one sees them .
@@rovidius2006 The point by the Sternglass-Einstein work that the real world is made up of charge entities in various states, if you spilt charge it takes energy, when the opposites collide that energy is released.
A lot more "particles" tied to orbitals are needed to identify all the ways this works.
Another view that gravity is a fluid that transmits forces yet isn't one.
Cheers, 🍺
@@ttmallard Indeed a lot more is needed ,but for humans there is only so much that can be had just like with cows or other beings ,there is a biological limit for all .Don't ask me how i know..
@@rovidius2006 Not sure what that means, yet mammals can survive up to 200ppm of hydrogen-sulfide in surviving the asteroid hit & PETM extinctions, our next in about 3.5ky-5ky away with BAU using fossil_fuels by past results.
Cheers 🍺
@@ttmallard Do to our limited size brain ,can we extrapolate our chances to understand more than 1% of the informational load imbedded in the universe around us ?We dont know how much we dont know but we could calculate our potential abilities . If dont think of it great areas may pass unnoticed .
So the great Alan Guth says "inflation *_once started_* ..."
That's fine, but it doesn't explain how inflation started from nothing.
there's no start, the mind cannot grasp that. We're conditioned to a causal world, but in the timeless realm, the idea of causality is what's ungraspable.
And btw, a delayed happy anniversary to you, that's my birthday too. But I'm a little bit younger...
@@RogerioLupoArteCientifica Really? There's no start? Then WHAT is the event that has been continously occurring into the infinite past?
WHAT expands in this model?
20july1944 is the date of the bomb plot against Hitler, not my birthday.
@@RogerioLupoArteCientifica If there's no start or beginning then that implies an eternal universe and if that's true how are we here now when there's an eternal past?
Does your “nothing” have physical laws? Time? Cause and effect? By definition it can’t, right? So what would stop inflation from starting? (On a side note, inflationists believe that all it takes to kick this off is a “quantum fluctuation”. This was covered in other videos on the channel with Guth and others.)
@@hckytwn3192 OK, a quantum fluctuation started the inflation.
I'm always looking for nouns in these statements.
Had the quantum field that fluctuated always existed without fluctuations prior to that, into the infinite past?
We understand < 5% of the universe. How can one theory based on 4% give all these ‘multiverse plausibilities’ and a scientist a confidence level of 75%? Appears ‘closer to science fiction’.
Those multiple universes evolve naturally in this one
So, one wider universe, where matter decays at different paces.
Like a country, where each village does not perceive the existence of the next one.
I have the answers to most of this but I'm not interested in sharing. I can share however that the answers would surprise you.
Does multiverses exist in the same space-time fabric?
it's like to ask if its really true that all gnomes have red pointy hats ...
For there to be multiverse there wud be more than one big bangs. So long as there is no another universes or big bangs are observed then it is just a speculations or theories...or like darwin theory it is just a bed time stories
The catch is" Who or what created the big bang"
We don’t know! The only truth here!
In one of these universes I didn’t watch the interview
Its very simple. Black holes creates other universes. For them its their bigbang. From our point of view its a blackhole
There was no "big bang." The universe is eternal and never ending - something humans cannot grasp. It's hilarious to me that some people feel/think they know so much about the universe and yet they cannot explain things that happen here on earth in real time.
What's your evidence for an eternal universe?
All theory!
They tell us this mind blowing stuff but they won't talk about the UFO..... Strange to me....
"So what's new in the world of physics?"
"Nothing."
"Really? Nothing?"
"Well. With the exception of String Theory not much has happened since the 1930s. And you can't prove String Theory. At best you can say, "Hey, look! My idea has an internal logical consistency!"
"Ahhh! Well, I'm sure things will pick up."
ruclips.net/video/L-oAYnasuSM/видео.html
Is he basically saying there was only one big bang? And that "pocket universes" are born from it? That doesn't sound very multiversy to me. If one big bang can happen, why not others?
So, are we in one such pocket Universe itself ?
He doesn’t talk about what inflation doesn’t predict and the huge problems with inflation…of course
How large a part of inflation decays into universe like this one?
By definition there is only one universe. But there may be many of them.
If I'm not wrong, wich is very posible that i'm wrong 🤣😂 The String theory propose atleast 10 dimensions, 11, or 26, we live in a 3Dimension world, well 4 dimension world length, width, height and time, which conforms the space-time, that it's expanding, and also bendable (gravitacional waves) those 3 spatial dimensions and time are fused in our daily reality, there's nothing just made of 1 or 2 spatial dimensions, or out of time, all the mater that we can see and observe is represented for ours the observers in this theater of 4 dimensions, so they only exist as geometric mathematical abstractions, if we asume that this assumptions about dimension are true, and we assume the ideal count of dimensions making the first one of this 10,11,26 posibles, the 1 dimension of our 3 spatial dimension world and time, and we theorize that the responsable for the inflation is the "inflaton" a theoric particle, and also think about the duality particle/wave or particle/string I imagine that all the quantum physics, that have diferent physics compared to the regular ones, have a origin on the 2 dimension, because waves only have length, and height, they can be represented as a bidimensional scheme, but this second dimension isn't isolated from the first one and the third one, and also time, so this waves can form wave fields, which extent in the 3 directions across time, but their original geometrical nature is 2 Dimension reality, or atleast is what I think, but thanks to that fuse of this pack of dimensions we can see their effects and movement across the 3 dimensions, for example emiting radio waves, but when you try to figure out the momentum and the position and the nature, observe the particle that forms the wave, the observator force this pack of dimensions to give the wave, or the wave field a concrete determined and geometrical nature of 3 dimension and time which it's called particle, foton, electron, proton, neutron... This nature it's more natural for us to observe and more intuitive, than the quantum wave field, because has been forced by our technology to be observed in our bigger scales, of space-time, so it adquires big part of the qualities of the regular matter and ligth that we can see everyday, that are big associations of this particles, with different physic natures, but isolated and amplified so much times the zoom. If the responsable for the inflation it's the hipotetic particle "inflaton" it will have also a wavefield nature originally, which means that inferior dimensions construct bigger ones, so maybe the expansion is that much bigger and exponential, and even than the light speed, because it has to create much more bigger dimensions that now doesn't exist, the same as our pack of 4 dimensions doesn't exist before "Big Bang" maybe they will pack our 4 dimensions, or maybe will create new ones independent from this, don't know, but maybe the 5 dimension and above will have different type of physics, product of the nature of our 4 ones, with a much bigger scale, and the limit of this 4 and the 5 will be, the contrary to the planck length, the most bigger size of 3 dimensional space-time posible before physics changes again, so one day maybe a inteligent living thing from that higer dimension find a form to observe our dimension, and see our galaxyes and think: oh wow theres a lot of particles down there, while observing and measuring our galaxyes, or maybe the "macrophysics" of that dimensions generate a reality pretty different that not gonna make happen something like this, but other will happen, I make to much assumptions, so true will be millions times more complex and different, but I like to think about that, I'm not so good at mathematic calculations but i'm trying 😂🤣😂🤣 (sorry for the bad english is not my native language)
The universe is infinite, if its not then there should be some hard thing on the edges of the universe, and that would be silly.
I love science fiction
Sci-fi now, reality later.