Brother the arguments here are based on my book on the existence of God. I have also released a book on the propheices of prophet muhammad saw. Are you interested in buying either or both books
Assalam alaikum brothers. If you liked the arguments and logic I used in this debate then you should check out my book on the existence of God. Here is a sample chapter from my book:docs.google.com/document/d/1LN4PxSR83sBMfRxLPh0b6_SLcJS4lgkpsDd6sp_UPGQ/edit and here is a link to buy my book: www.smashwords.com/books/1591569 Buying this book would really help me out and help me produce more excellent and unique content.
@@unclemeag7050 i know brother. I appreciate feedback. I am working on improving my channel. I just got a new mic and am thinking about how to improve things. I do appreciate the feedback
Very strange discussion, theist always repeating the same points while ignoring the responses... And why focus on intuition as the atheist has one that opposes the theist's, so according to the theist standard himself should take the argument of evil with great respect. The same he ask the atheist to take for his P1 P2.The atheist do not need intuitions more that the Münchhausen trilemma, but usually use them to counter the theist' ones. This is why actual philosophers do not argue that, recognizing that their very personal intuitions do little work when they have the burden of proving their favorite deities by providing various arguments. The atheist can simply be unconvinced. No need for him to push back with alternative points, simply pointing out that such points exist is enough. After all no one would ask you to counter my affirmation that you have an even number of hair with a proof it is odd.
Just because you are desperate and deluded that does not mean I was dodging the responses. I literally addressed everything that clown said while he spent the entire time in cognitive dissonance. If you can grow a spine I would be more than happy to debate you on this topic in a recorded debate. If not feel free to whine in the comments
@@RefutingOrientalists I will debate you as soon I redeemed my gift cards. You seem unable to gasp the opponents points, perhaps a language barrier, as all your others 'debates' have shown. I will not waste time. Good luck for following the pdf file.
good video
Brother the arguments here are based on my book on the existence of God. I have also released a book on the propheices of prophet muhammad saw. Are you interested in buying either or both books
Assalam alaikum brothers. If you liked the arguments and logic I used in this debate then you should check out my book on the existence of God. Here is a sample chapter from my book:docs.google.com/document/d/1LN4PxSR83sBMfRxLPh0b6_SLcJS4lgkpsDd6sp_UPGQ/edit and here is a link to buy my book: www.smashwords.com/books/1591569 Buying this book would really help me out and help me produce more excellent and unique content.
I think you should add subtitles to your debates sometimes the audio goes slow and the cc captions are in correct
I want to do that but the debates are so long it would probably take me a few days just to add subtitles to one debate
@@RefutingOrientalists that’s fair I don’t mean to sound critical
@@unclemeag7050 i know brother. I appreciate feedback. I am working on improving my channel. I just got a new mic and am thinking about how to improve things. I do appreciate the feedback
@@RefutingOrientalists keep it up I also plan on buying your book
Very strange discussion, theist always repeating the same points while ignoring the responses...
And why focus on intuition as the atheist has one that opposes the theist's, so according to the theist standard himself should take the argument of evil with great respect. The same he ask the atheist to take for his P1 P2.The atheist do not need intuitions more that the Münchhausen trilemma, but usually use them to counter the theist' ones.
This is why actual philosophers do not argue that, recognizing that their very personal intuitions do little work when they have the burden of proving their favorite deities by providing various arguments. The atheist can simply be unconvinced. No need for him to push back with alternative points, simply pointing out that such points exist is enough. After all no one would ask you to counter my affirmation that you have an even number of hair with a proof it is odd.
Just because you are desperate and deluded that does not mean I was dodging the responses. I literally addressed everything that clown said while he spent the entire time in cognitive dissonance. If you can grow a spine I would be more than happy to debate you on this topic in a recorded debate. If not feel free to whine in the comments
@@RefutingOrientalists I will debate you as soon I redeemed my gift cards. You seem unable to gasp the opponents points, perhaps a language barrier, as all your others 'debates' have shown. I will not waste time. Good luck for following the pdf file.