16 ATP Titles 1 Masters 1000 Singles Title (Miami 2018) Longest Match (11hr 5min at Wimbledon 2010) Fastest ATP Serve (157.2 mph) IW/Miami ’22: Doubles Sunshine Double Record Acer (14,450!) Congratulations to big John Isner! 🙏
His main strength was his serve, obviously, but always liked watching him, happy retirement, Big John. Also, his match with Fed on Laver Cup was one of the best
Victoires of John Isner against the four players : 2 against Djokovic 2 against Federer 1 against Nadal 1 against Murray And the last one last year in Wimbledon was so magnificent! One of his best match played recently!
@@tiebrkr4231 first of all laver cup matches are best of 3 with 3rd set tiebreakers which is not atp tour format. Secondly practice sets are played at high level doesn't mean it can become official. Once u hav declared something as unofficial it cant be retrospectively official. U can only make future editions official not ones that are finished. Abu dhabi tournament before ao, then hopman cup and all is not in h2h
Why do you want to mention big 4, it would be better to show only isner's legacy without putting him under others shadow. Make a stand alone video show his Wimbledon if possible
Just posting this here...Why don't you guys take over the video highlight sections from all 4 grand slam production houses? US Open highlights are just a sheer disgrace towards the sport or anyone wishing to enjoy tennis. Take my money/Put my signnature on a petition.
Murray was as good as the big 3 at his peak and should have won more slams having appeared in 11 finals but only winning 3 rather unluckily. However, following his hip replacement and a number of injuries I would agree that it became just the big 3, with Murray falling behind. Murray was also the only person in the era of the big 3 to be world number 1 other than them so u would say, in conclusion, at his peak, Murray was just as good as Djokovic or nadal, maybe not federer as he is the best ever but he fell short of his peak much quicker than any of the others, leading to him falling out of the big 4
1. Djokovic 2. Federer 3. Nadal Federer has more weeks (total and consecutive) at no 1 than Nadal, and was a more dominant player in his prime than Nadal. Other than just GS titles, I consider 'dominance' as an important part of goat debate. 2000s was the era of Federer, 2010s was the era of Djokovic. Nadal never dominated to the extent of Djokovic or Federer, other than on his favourite clay
@@pokalorentz9363 lol. Federer prime rivals were obviously relatively weak and nadal had 13 slams in 2010s compared to 15 off novak which is nothing difference considering novak won 5 slams in 15-16 when rafa didnt win one. Only reason rafa has lesser weeks at no1 is due to injury layoffs in 09,12-13,18. There are only 2 main surfaces. Atleast nadal dominated 1 surface throughout his career unlike other2 who couldn't dominate hard like nadal on clay.
@@kevinstarski1598 not really if u look at overall achievements its big3. But if u look at big4 era this is accurate it was the big2 and fed,murray behind them. Fed career achievements are similar to rafole as he was big1 for a period of time when he accumulated his achievements
There is no "Big Four". Andy Murray does not belong in it at all with his achieved results. Just the usual insolence and arrogance of the British to intrude in somewhere where there is no place for them. Murray: "I would like to boast that with my only three Grand Slam titles (out of a possible 82 ) , I belong to the four Tennis Titans who made it impossible for the vast majority of other tennis players to win a Grand Slam in the period 2003-2023." Wawrinka: "Congratulations then"😁
Why on earth is Murray actually one of the big 4 and Wawrinka isn't? They both have won 3 grand slams I would just keep them out of the conversation with the big 3
Lol murray is light years ahead of wawrinka in terms of week to week consistency and overall career. Wawrinka just peaked at right time for a few slams and was lucky with injury in gs final too
can you djokovic fans shut up for once?? john just played the last singles match of his career, stop trying to steal his moment and make it about novak
@@tiebrkr4231 Obviously he is a burning fedalita trying to make Nole fanbase look bad LMFAO it can only be one of those, they are that frackin' stoopid.
16 ATP Titles
1 Masters 1000 Singles Title (Miami 2018)
Longest Match (11hr 5min at Wimbledon 2010)
Fastest ATP Serve (157.2 mph)
IW/Miami ’22: Doubles Sunshine Double
Record Acer (14,450!)
Congratulations to big John Isner! 🙏
I thought fastest serve is 163mph/h Sam Groth
Truly a remarkable and humble player!
he'll be missed!! john has always been one of my favourite players 🫶🏻
really gonna miss big isner, especially his outstanding performances no matter the situation
He was not just a great server, he was great player. True legend.
Have a great tennis career ISNER❤
Ace master 👍
John's shots are perfect. 👍💪😍
Greatest server to ever play!
Federers stats are also impressive, he is 23 cm smaller than Isner and yet he is Top 3 of the most aces ever hit
His main strength was his serve, obviously, but always liked watching him, happy retirement, Big John. Also, his match with Fed on Laver Cup was one of the best
как же грустно,что завершил...я буду скучать по пушке Джону😭😭😭
Best of luck with retirement John! Enjoy with family
Thank you, John Isner, for being the best American when Europeans came in to dominate. You set a precedent for modern American tennis.
lol
Roddick?
@@MEZOMEZO2011 Roddick counts as a dominant American.
@@official_rown yes he was doing well during the european domination era
Victoires of John Isner against the four players :
2 against Djokovic
2 against Federer
1 against Nadal
1 against Murray
And the last one last year in Wimbledon was so magnificent! One of his best match played recently!
He did not beat nadal. It was added from laver retrospectively. Thats like uaing exhibition matches
@@astonishingaparajit6785 Yes he did beat him. Laver Cup matches are official. Whether you like it, or not.
@@tiebrkr4231 it was not official when he beat him. It was made official retrospectively which is embarassing
@@astonishingaparajit6785 Yeah but he did. And it’s official now. And considering the level of the game, it is absolutely fair.
@@tiebrkr4231 first of all laver cup matches are best of 3 with 3rd set tiebreakers which is not atp tour format. Secondly practice sets are played at high level doesn't mean it can become official. Once u hav declared something as unofficial it cant be retrospectively official. U can only make future editions official not ones that are finished.
Abu dhabi tournament before ao, then hopman cup and all is not in h2h
Big John
Legend
I agree my favorite american in that time period
I tuned in fully expecting 4 mega-aces and I would've been satisfied :)
To beat someone more talented than yourself is quite a feat😮
Did any tennis player annouce a retirement then come back ?
Murray I guess
Bjon borg
Gosh, we STILL making videos with "big 4" in them, as if Murray deserves a place besides the other three.
Too bad he retired, really enjoyed watching his matches over the years. "Big John" with the killer serve. He will be missed.
bUt tHeRE iS oNLy thE biG ThrEe!!!
Watch some of Isner's best matches in full, free for a limited time -> tnn.is/isner
Why do you want to mention big 4, it would be better to show only isner's legacy without putting him under others shadow. Make a stand alone video show his Wimbledon if possible
THERE IS NO BIG 4!!!
It's both. They mean different things.
Murray and federer have pretty equal achievements in the 2010s
How many matches did he actually win against the top 3?
Ok he beat them 5 times..not bad for a serve bot ..😮
@@roydondsaI think it's 6 if you include beating Nadal at Laver Cup. Joker 2, Fed 2 Nadal 1, Murray 1 (although this was more recently)
凄い…
@@brianmoney410 not talking about Murray
Just posting this here...Why don't you guys take over the video highlight sections from all 4 grand slam production houses? US Open highlights are just a sheer disgrace towards the sport or anyone wishing to enjoy tennis. Take my money/Put my signnature on a petition.
there’s only the big 3 stop including murray
Hilarious
Who is Murray?
Murray was as good as the big 3 at his peak and should have won more slams having appeared in 11 finals but only winning 3 rather unluckily. However, following his hip replacement and a number of injuries I would agree that it became just the big 3, with Murray falling behind. Murray was also the only person in the era of the big 3 to be world number 1 other than them so u would say, in conclusion, at his peak, Murray was just as good as Djokovic or nadal, maybe not federer as he is the best ever but he fell short of his peak much quicker than any of the others, leading to him falling out of the big 4
No.
Big 4 ??
It's big 3
There is no such thing as big 4. If you put Murray in there, then Wawrinka should be included too.
There was never a Big 4. There is only Big 2 - Djokovic and Nadal. Federer can be added like a 3rd wheel. Murray is never in the picture
Now that's a unique opinion 🙄
people really putting claydal on second 😂
1. Djokovic
2. Federer
3. Nadal
Federer has more weeks (total and consecutive) at no 1 than Nadal, and was a more dominant player in his prime than Nadal.
Other than just GS titles, I consider 'dominance' as an important part of goat debate. 2000s was the era of Federer, 2010s was the era of Djokovic. Nadal never dominated to the extent of Djokovic or Federer, other than on his favourite clay
@@pokalorentz9363 lol. Federer prime rivals were obviously relatively weak and nadal had 13 slams in 2010s compared to 15 off novak which is nothing difference considering novak won 5 slams in 15-16 when rafa didnt win one.
Only reason rafa has lesser weeks at no1 is due to injury layoffs in 09,12-13,18.
There are only 2 main surfaces. Atleast nadal dominated 1 surface throughout his career unlike other2 who couldn't dominate hard like nadal on clay.
@@kevinstarski1598 not really if u look at overall achievements its big3. But if u look at big4 era this is accurate it was the big2 and fed,murray behind them.
Fed career achievements are similar to rafole as he was big1 for a period of time when he accumulated his achievements
BIG 4???????🤣🤣
There is no "Big Four".
Andy Murray does not belong in it at all with his achieved results. Just the usual insolence and arrogance of the British to intrude in somewhere where there is no place for them.
Murray: "I would like to boast that with my only three Grand Slam titles (out of a possible 82 ) , I belong to the four Tennis Titans who made it impossible for the vast majority of other tennis players to win a Grand Slam in the period 2003-2023."
Wawrinka: "Congratulations then"😁
Repulsive maga servebot.
Why on earth is Murray actually one of the big 4 and Wawrinka isn't? They both have won 3 grand slams
I would just keep them out of the conversation with the big 3
I would agree there is no big 4... But if there could be any player that challenged the 3 it was murray
Check stats. Murray is miles ahead of Wawrinka.
Lol murray is light years ahead of wawrinka in terms of week to week consistency and overall career.
Wawrinka just peaked at right time for a few slams and was lucky with injury in gs final too
trump voter 🤨
Let's see how man GS titles John has lol....#NoleFor24th
can you djokovic fans shut up for once??
john just played the last singles match of his career, stop trying to steal his moment and make it about novak
That’s suspect. All Djokovic fans also love Isner. Are you one of those fake Djokovic fans trying to make us look like bad people?
@@tiebrkr4231 Obviously he is a burning fedalita trying to make Nole fanbase look bad LMFAO it can only be one of those, they are that frackin' stoopid.
cringe asf.... lets see how many times user-ex1iq3hq2z has stepped outside lol
there is no big 4, stop overrating murray just because he belongs to british