If anyone hasn’t seen the update on this; the gunner thanked video games (possibly War Thunder) for helping him destroy it because he remembered where to shoot and the weak spots of the T-90 (that’s a rough recollection of his quote).
@@PatriotsW710yeah, but in terms of upgrade packages we pretty much gave em scraps, the first M1 abrams for example are very, very different from Today’s M1A1 SEPV3
This really shows whoever fires first has a big advantage. Second is that tanks are vulnerable to vehicles that cannot even perpetrate them, but simply destroy its ability to fight. Bradley being faster and smaller certainly has an advantage also in this area.
I Saw another comment from other videos, basically the Bradley crew didn't do the job, they just blinding the Russia crew and drone did the job. Plus i think the t90 was damaged
The tankers first fired armor-piercing ones, but then switched to high-explosive fragmentation, blinding the enemy, knocked out optical instruments and damaged the control system, the tank turret began to rotate, the crew left the tank and the tank drove into a tree, then a kamikaze drone arrived
@pocaujmniewdupepocaujmniew5128 It’s 25mm there was no way they were getting through it 😅, their best hope was destroying the optics like they did in the video disabling the tank but still keeping its crew members alive
@pocaujmniewdupepocaujmniew5128 if the tank is blind, immobile and unable to fire back its effectively destroyed. You don't have to explode the ammo to destroy a tank. If the optics, gun, turret ring, hatchs, and tracks are destroyed and the crew abandons the vehicle thats definitely taken out of the fight
Just a reminder that when we're sending military aid to Ukraine, it's usually not a big pile of money. It's usually old weaponry that we're about to cycle out and the military is required to put a price tag on the equipment. This is what Ukraine is managing to pull off with those resources that we're about to be cycled out!
@@preemavivek2008idk the situation but if that 80 billion figure is true it likely does not mean cold hard cash, just 80 billions worth I assets which is a lot. However, the hardware we're giving them is, to my knowledge, old variants of what we use. The Bradley entered service in 1981 and has received numerous retrofits and upgrades since then, making the ones the US uses practically unrecognizable to the base model, which is what we're likely giving Ukraine
The war in Ukraine has been a treasure trove of data for the US department of defense. The USA is getting to see it's hardware(albeit old) in real combat without risking any of their own. Meanwhile the money buying replacements is helping to stimulate local economies. The military wins by getting replacements for the old worn out stuff.
This is not true. The US is funding the Ukrainian government with actual cash. You can’t fight a war without a functioning government. Whether or not not this money is being spent correctly is up for discussion lol.
@@ToolofSociety This is the angle that needs to be played up publicly to secure more public support: That we’re already saving and even making more money in the short and long term from the aid we’ve been sending than if we were to leave Ukraine high and dry and let out assets continue to waste away… If you can’t win over people by their hearts alone, you have to appeal to their more pragmatic instincts.
If you watch the full lenght video, you will see 2 IFVs against the tank, the tank very soon got blind due the accurate IFV gunfire against the tank optics, the explosions shown are the effect of reactive protection and yes, it was a small victory because at the and the IFVs seriously damaged the tank, but from the other side, this tank protected the crew that safely evacuated the tank immobilized against a tree and on fire. The crew sholud thank the pilot who always offered the front side to IFVs insted to escape offering the less protected back side. Boys: this is not a videogame.
The M2 Bradley didn't do damage to The inside but messed up The smoke launchers (The explosion) instruments and The cupolas. The Crew abandoned The tank due to panic and because The thing that locks The turret Ring was Broken so The turret started moving on its own. Later it was destroyed by a Kamikaze drone
@@Beenlawden “didn’t do damage” just destroyed its targeting systems disabled the turret and destroyed the smoke launchers “didn’t do damage” you’re delusion is showing
@bradleystanley1184 they did state on the inside of the tank, but honestly, I can agree with you on this. That tank was effectively mission killed before a drone popped the chassis, rendering it usable only for the scrap yards.
@@FreeWeIdThe crew survived without a scratch, the Bradley only blinded the tank and the explosion you see are from the tank reactor armor, the crew abandoned the tank shortly in the full video
Getting hit by those 25 mm while inside a tank its equivalent to being inside a bell being pounded. One RUclipsr military analyst mentioned that the noise would have disoriented the T-90 crew.
What must it feel like inside that tank? Is each impact loud and shakes the whole vehicle? Is it terrifying? Or does the heavy armour absorb it well and isn't much noise inside the tank?
Actually ukriane lost 50km land that day which won't be a win. Moreover this tank escaped but later a drone arrived and hit but still the crew walked away
How did it destroy it if i might ask. I see that the bradley dis nothing to the T-90 the big explosion at the end are the smoke charges that were set on fire
It destroyed optics, and turret controls. They were blind and out of control until they hit a tree and abandoned the tank. Kamakaze drones took it out later
@@vladislavovi44well I mean what little can you do when you’re sitting blind with no turret controls? And apparently a drone finished it off from what I’m hearing.
@@Dalgol21 another video shows that the turret is rotating without a problem, and about the sights we cant say if they are taken out. The T-90m has multiple primary and secondary sights. If im not mistaking 2 digital targeting sights( one primary gunners sight, and commander sight) and 1 or 2 optical gunners sights so i doubt that all of them were destroyed
Missing the big picture here. It disabled it's ability to fight. That's all you have to do disable the enemy's ability to fight be it an infantry man or a tank. A tank without a crew (that escaped) is worthless
The Bradley didn't "obliterate" the T90. It just knocked out the T90s optics. The Bradley is a really effective IFV but the T90 absorbs the rounds pretty well actually.
Actually ukriane lost 50km land that day which won't be a win. Moreover this tank escaped but later a drone arrived and hit but still the crew walked away
@@abdmzn wrong. Russia will drag it so long, that ukraine will lose manpower and resources. Eventually the people will be fed up with it. And then Russia can just steamroll through. They used the same strategy in ww2 as well. And just for info, Russia has like 140 million people, ukraine has way less
The fact that most people here really think It exploded instead of using a smile granade is embarassing. The Bradley literally only destroyed a few optics, not a single serious hit landed that day
Ofc, a Bradley is not built against tank, but they have a last arsenal options against tank that could one hit it and idk why didn't they use it here Maybe probably because they wanted to perma blind the enemy or bullying
Yo for those wondering, the T-90 tank has explosive reactive armor, what dude did was hit all those ERA’s and make them explode leaving fuel tanks, and other systems discovered.
That ERA was working as intended, but only for however long it could last considering one Bradley was laying into the T-90m…..and there was two in the area.
At least we don’t have to pay to recycle and demolish old vehicles and munitions, at least somebody can get a use from them. I don’t think the majority of our country realizes how much money we actually spend on just retiring old equipment so this is a win win in my book
Well the Bradley itself didn't destroy it, there is no way a 25 mm cannon can destroy an MBT's frontal armor. Rather than showing how "bad" the T-90M is, it shows how bad russian crew training is Source: my (as impartial as can be) opinion
Why as that big blast away from the tank? It doesn't look like the T-90 got destroyed. More like a part its explosive armour blew outwards. And the fact the video ended before we could see the aftermath of that blast makes me think it wasn't destroyed.
The initial series of smaller explosions, which I discern to be high-explosive (HE) rounds, with sharp bursts of sound and fiery flashes, signaling the onset of combat. Following these, the resounding detonation, echoing through the battlefield like a thunderclap, marks the activation of the T-90's reactive armor, a last-ditch defense mechanism against incoming threats. Despite the chaos erupting around it, the T-90 emerges from the tumult relatively unscathed, a testament to its robust design and the skill of its crew in navigating the hazards of modern warfare.
They blinded the tank. They destroyed all the cameras on the outside leaving the gunner and driver both blinded and deafened. Everyone lived from this encounter. T-90 hits a tree and gets stuck so the crew bails and runs. The Bradley's reposition to avoid any possible counter fire.
it did not obliterate the tank, the T90 has reactive armor that works like flairs. The t90 also first got hit from a FPV drone and had it turret disabled, then the Bradley was taking shots at the front of the tank that isn't even penetrationmable from a Bradly. The American Abram tank legit died to a single drone and grenades. (Also the T90 crew survived and was towed back for repairs and was back on the front line)
Dude, the Bradley hit the most important components like Fire Controls System and the Hydraulics. You haven’t seen it The crew of that Russian Tank was captured and the T-90 later got obliterated by a Drone.
@@Romanov117 yea it disabled the tank but there was no fire or any smoke afterwards, and the drone hit it first then the Bradley came later, the crew did not get captured i do not know where you heard that from
@@Justinianthegreat09 are you being salty how much the T-90’s haven’t shown dominance over the Battlefield that the Abrams still remain the superior vehicle under NATO hands. Let me tell you one thing, is that you’re cheering over weakened Ukraine in February and now they’re pushing back in Ivaniske because the U.S. Aid is coming back.
Most likely 1 bradley because shots came from only one direction. They could've been side by side but the tracers say that only one Bradley was presently fighting the T90M
A fitting term based on what is shown in the video. Did you have a more eloquent or accurate way of describing it? Or... no, you just came here to say "really tho??? Look how smart I am."
So basically it got destroyed because the tank was rendered useless… 😂 when you wreck your car it doesn’t have to turn into a crushed coke can to be considered a totaled vehicle. This tank was busted beyond repair regardless if the hatch flew off the tank and it completely blew up sky high. 😂
@@XoKingChaseXo wth are you even saying the tank is basically just blinded and at longer version of the video the tank rammed into a tree and all crew came out and abandoned it
@@youaveragegamer3746His point stands, the tank was taken out of the fight and won't be returning anytime soon, if ever. By all metrics it was effectively destroyed.
Reminds me of how insurance classified a car as totaled. A tank doesn't have to blow up like a Michael bay movie to be considered "destroyed". Granted the word inoperable would better describe what happened the thing is this tank was taken out of action just by what we see in the video. And was made into scrap with the drones later on. So it was destroyed by every definition of the word. Just not in the video Although the reputation of the T-90 was destroyed by this video.
I hate to be the one that points this out, but tank did its job and protected the crew, the explosion off the turret was the smoke grenades as you can as the T-90M is still moving around… yes I call it a win for the Bradley but the T-90M wasn’t destroyed by a Bradley it was destroyed by a Drone
It's just luck. Direct confrontation also depends on the level of experience of the crew and gunner. But honestly, if the Bradley is hit by a T90 shell, there is no chance of survival, but if the T90 is hit by a Bradley shell in a vulnerable spot, then there will be problems, for example, it cannot be controlled. In short, tanks are still better in terms of protection and firepower. You can't use a rare case to make a general assessment. So what should we say when many tanks are taken down by a soldier using a shoulder-mounted anti-tank gun? Is it true that the soldier is more powerful than the tank???
Gotta love how this is a perfect example of explosive reactive armor stopping smaller rounds and the west thinks the tank is blowing up even thought they are still driving around and firing back and leave the fight and limp back to base all alive.
Many people think that the last explosion was tank getting destroyed but reality is it was probably a smoke granade getting lauched by the crew or possible because of the bradley shot at the end bradley couldn't destroy the tank but letter got destoryed by a drone
Tank got disabled it can't be useful it's not destroyed but not in working condition as well parts are damaged even millitary can't fix this tank now soon it can captured by Ukraine or soon it will held as memorial victory over russia
Looks like a training issue for the russians rather than a technical problem... They should have not be at close quarter with the bradley. And the tank was disabled. Not destroyed.
30 busmaster useless against tanks like t90m thats why bradleys equipped with anti thank missiles, the tank destroyed by 3 fpv after the crew unharmed abandoned
If anyone hasn’t seen the update on this; the gunner thanked video games (possibly War Thunder) for helping him destroy it because he remembered where to shoot and the weak spots of the T-90 (that’s a rough recollection of his quote).
Woah 😳... It's that true? Maybe I should play more War thunder
Lol
He only said that he played game, we can't be sure it's WT or not.
@@Yanespe It's gotta be WT or, where else can you find a simulation of a T90m.
@@JeepersBeepers_ Arma.
Russians frantically trying to explain to everyone how it was actually a win cuz the auto loader didn’t evaporate the crew
I see you commenting on all videos regarding this report , smh these paid bots
the tank crew was captured by the Ukrainian army
@@youaveragegamer3746do you see the Russian tank that was suppose to take over Europe get wrecked by ifv? 😂😂
@@youaveragegamer3746 says you? LOL
@@sorionx4817 no, they were not. They escaped safe and sound.
This is so humiliating for Russia, the US basically gave Ukraine its scraps and they’re defeating Russia spectacularly with old weapon vehicles
Bradley M2 is a mainstay in the USA military lol
@@PatriotsW710yeah, but in terms of upgrade packages we pretty much gave em scraps, the first M1 abrams for example are very, very different from Today’s M1A1 SEPV3
no idiots, the T90 survive.. the exploding is come from defensive system
@jombonny1202
Surely you must be joking. 😏🤣🤣
@@PatriotsW710 There is no "lol" here. Hundreds of people are being killed every day.
This really shows whoever fires first has a big advantage. Second is that tanks are vulnerable to vehicles that cannot even perpetrate them, but simply destroy its ability to fight.
Bradley being faster and smaller certainly has an advantage also in this area.
Yes, it's tricky in close combat.
Anti-tank mines are relatively cheap & sometimes destroy a tank, but their only intended function is to break a track & immobilize it.
Imagine getting bullied whilst driving a tank. 😂🤣
Ahahahahahah😂
Imagine being a big muscle bound dude getting bullied by a little person…..
I Saw another comment from other videos, basically the Bradley crew didn't do the job, they just blinding the Russia crew and drone did the job. Plus i think the t90 was damaged
Bullied by a cheap AFV no less. The T90 is a joke. 🤣
@@KiraSlith sir, there is reason why t90 is used, it's like saying that anti tank launcher is better than tank.
The tankers first fired armor-piercing ones, but then switched to high-explosive fragmentation, blinding the enemy, knocked out optical instruments and damaged the control system, the tank turret began to rotate, the crew left the tank and the tank drove into a tree, then a kamikaze drone arrived
That explosion was probably from the reactive armor. I don't think it was from a high-explosive round.
@@integratedhatespreaderI believe it was reactive armor too, but all the metal coming off before was the hei-t rounds I think
@pocaujmniewdupepocaujmniew5128 It’s 25mm there was no way they were getting through it 😅, their best hope was destroying the optics like they did in the video disabling the tank but still keeping its crew members alive
@pocaujmniewdupepocaujmniew5128 if the tank is blind, immobile and unable to fire back its effectively destroyed. You don't have to explode the ammo to destroy a tank. If the optics, gun, turret ring, hatchs, and tracks are destroyed and the crew abandons the vehicle thats definitely taken out of the fight
The crew used it well. Talk about battlefield improvisations.
Just a reminder that when we're sending military aid to Ukraine, it's usually not a big pile of money. It's usually old weaponry that we're about to cycle out and the military is required to put a price tag on the equipment. This is what Ukraine is managing to pull off with those resources that we're about to be cycled out!
80 billion dollar aid and Bradley is still the backbone of US if forced
@@preemavivek2008idk the situation but if that 80 billion figure is true it likely does not mean cold hard cash, just 80 billions worth I assets which is a lot. However, the hardware we're giving them is, to my knowledge, old variants of what we use. The Bradley entered service in 1981 and has received numerous retrofits and upgrades since then, making the ones the US uses practically unrecognizable to the base model, which is what we're likely giving Ukraine
The war in Ukraine has been a treasure trove of data for the US department of defense. The USA is getting to see it's hardware(albeit old) in real combat without risking any of their own. Meanwhile the money buying replacements is helping to stimulate local economies. The military wins by getting replacements for the old worn out stuff.
This is not true. The US is funding the Ukrainian government with actual cash. You can’t fight a war without a functioning government. Whether or not not this money is being spent correctly is up for discussion lol.
@@ToolofSociety
This is the angle that needs to be played up publicly to secure more public support:
That we’re already saving and even making more money in the short and long term from the aid we’ve been sending than if we were to leave Ukraine high and dry and let out assets continue to waste away…
If you can’t win over people by their hearts alone, you have to appeal to their more pragmatic instincts.
If you watch the full lenght video, you will see 2 IFVs against the tank, the tank very soon got blind due the accurate IFV gunfire against the tank optics, the explosions shown are the effect of reactive protection and yes, it was a small victory because at the and the IFVs seriously damaged the tank, but from the other side, this tank protected the crew that safely evacuated the tank immobilized against a tree and on fire. The crew sholud thank the pilot who always offered the front side to IFVs insted to escape offering the less protected back side.
Boys: this is not a videogame.
+1
Ok, I see why ukraine loves this weapon !!!
The M2 Bradley didn't do damage to The inside but messed up The smoke launchers (The explosion) instruments and The cupolas.
The Crew abandoned The tank due to panic and because The thing that locks The turret Ring was Broken so The turret started moving on its own. Later it was destroyed by a Kamikaze drone
@@Beenlawden “didn’t do damage” just destroyed its targeting systems disabled the turret and destroyed the smoke launchers “didn’t do damage” you’re delusion is showing
@bradleystanley1184 they did state on the inside of the tank, but honestly, I can agree with you on this. That tank was effectively mission killed before a drone popped the chassis, rendering it usable only for the scrap yards.
It must have been scary for the crew inside the T-90, hearing the rounds pounding the hull of the tank.
I think they were pretty cheese at that point
@@FreeWeIdThe crew survived without a scratch, the Bradley only blinded the tank and the explosion you see are from the tank reactor armor, the crew abandoned the tank shortly in the full video
@@icekidtvshorts4504 without a scratch?
Getting hit by those 25 mm while inside a tank its equivalent to being inside a bell being pounded.
One RUclipsr military analyst mentioned that the noise would have disoriented the T-90 crew.
Ears probably still ringing and still disoriented
The tracers in the rounds give it a sci-fi look.
@Mr.quack25 what's your point? Doesn't change what @lidraman2 observed.
tracer or penetrator bullets, depleted uranium?
So machine guns really do incapacitate a tank, like in war thunder.
I mean, they were autocannons which explains it a bit more
Fun fact: The pilot of this Bradley tank played War Thunder and knew where to hit the T90
So crazy that the Russian Air Force made an appearance for a split second there (t90 turret)
are you blind the turret it still intact, plus the explosion was a gas grenade exploding
@@pfirwas not a gas grenade it was the ERA exploding right when they T90 launched a smoke grenade
I see you're taking a regular dose of Ukrainian Blue pills each day.
@konnerkramer329 finnaly someone with a brain
Gotdam but that was a beating!
Most modern russian tank can't even go toe to toe with a gulf war era bradley 😂😂😂
The bradley guy: WAIT, I'M PLAYING WAR THUNDER
Russia thinks it can somehow bully around Western Europe when it's the second best army in Ukraine.
Soon Putin's army will be the 2nd best army in Russia
Your comment turned to be a prophecy after Kursk Operation. Well done 👍 @@CCP-Lies
Let's ignore the Russian Ukraine war right now and just admire how cool this footage actually is
Nope you just cant ignorantly dismiss the context.
@@globalcitizen9521 womp womp just enjoy the footage before I touch you
@@suggmeawfDave Chappell?
@@bradleystanley1184 you're next
@@suggmeawf 💀
What must it feel like inside that tank? Is each impact loud and shakes the whole vehicle? Is it terrifying?
Or does the heavy armour absorb it well and isn't much noise inside the tank?
I imagine the turret controller was terrified because they destroyed the optics. It probably was scary, i think they didnt saw them
You how a roller coaster gets to those parts where it’s banging you around? Like that plus ya deaf and dying
It's more like hearing heavy rain drops when you wearing a helmet, but in this video the reactive armor of the tank must make some loud noise.
Apparently if you hear the newest sounds in war thunder it gives some veterans ptsd....
They're 25mm, not 120mm Tank rounds that ostensibly should also bounce at least once or twice, but war is war.
I really wish there was a video with the audio
“Best job I ever had!”- Fury
Bradley: "Nah, I'd win"
Actually ukriane lost 50km land that day which won't be a win. Moreover this tank escaped but later a drone arrived and hit but still the crew walked away
@@suryanshsagar2677you sure it was that day.
Singular?
@@idkusernameeggatron4652 huh ? Bruh do you operate on Intel Pentium ?
@@suryanshsagar2677😂😂
@@suryanshsagar2677 do you run on copium
Precision 🔥🔥🔥
a light armored vehicle took out a whole tank, thats cold
That's what TOW missiles are designed for
@@FrankBru Nor a single TOW was fired here
This machine has got to be one huge FMAB reference... Given ya know... Hiw Bradley easily obliterated a tank.
Wow 😮🇺🇸💪
It was a drone that destroyed the tank but the Bradley kept it blind
I didn’t see no tank get destroyed here
disabled
Press F to repair
How did it destroy it if i might ask. I see that the bradley dis nothing to the T-90 the big explosion at the end are the smoke charges that were set on fire
It destroyed optics, and turret controls. They were blind and out of control until they hit a tree and abandoned the tank. Kamakaze drones took it out later
@@Digdug44 i still don’t see the destruction of this tank just that they abandoned it
@@vladislavovi44well I mean what little can you do when you’re sitting blind with no turret controls? And apparently a drone finished it off from what I’m hearing.
@@Dalgol21 another video shows that the turret is rotating without a problem, and about the sights we cant say if they are taken out. The T-90m has multiple primary and secondary sights. If im not mistaking 2 digital targeting sights( one primary gunners sight, and commander sight) and 1 or 2 optical gunners sights so i doubt that all of them were destroyed
Missing the big picture here. It disabled it's ability to fight. That's all you have to do disable the enemy's ability to fight be it an infantry man or a tank. A tank without a crew (that escaped) is worthless
The Bradley didn't "obliterate" the T90. It just knocked out the T90s optics. The Bradley is a really effective IFV but the T90 absorbs the rounds pretty well actually.
War with NATO they told 😂😂
Win in 3 Days they want 😂😂
Kherson forever they said😂
Actually ukriane lost 50km land that day which won't be a win. Moreover this tank escaped but later a drone arrived and hit but still the crew walked away
They never said that 😂😂😂 who invades in straight lines and outnumbered 5:1? you dumb fcking sheep
@@suryanshsagar2677 Even if Ukraine did lose 50km every day (it isn't) it will take decades for Russia to win the war, and manpower it doesn't have.
@@abdmzn wrong. Russia will drag it so long, that ukraine will lose manpower and resources. Eventually the people will be fed up with it. And then Russia can just steamroll through. They used the same strategy in ww2 as well. And just for info, Russia has like 140 million people, ukraine has way less
Really makes you wonder what goes through the Russian crews head as they get slapped by an American Bradley.
The fact that most people here really think It exploded instead of using a smile granade is embarassing. The Bradley literally only destroyed a few optics, not a single serious hit landed that day
This video will upset putins allies in the gop
I'm with the GOP and the support for pulling out of Ukraine is insane, please send help 😂
Cry harder boomer. Your party is in shambles and cannot even elect a speaker of the house without insane backdoor deals to your party's crazies.
How is this upsetting? How about you look at the graveyard of bradleys that's been shown? "Silence"
@@WarAuthority move to Russia
@@WarAuthority because the MAGA CULT GOP are Putins best allies. They are now on the side of North Korea and Iran. No silence
Actually it was not destroyed and the t90 crew survived the ambush
Disabled would be the proper way to describe it.
Ofc, a Bradley is not built against tank,
but they have a last arsenal options against tank that could one hit it and idk why didn't they use it here
Maybe probably because they wanted to perma blind the enemy or bullying
@@denzelpardillo1181 Mission killed for sure. Recovery ops will distract manpower.
@@ehe8692I don’t think this one was fitted with TOWs so they only had the bushmaster.
Crew had to evacuate
It barely misses. Just how precise that Bradley cannon?
Yo for those wondering, the T-90 tank has explosive reactive armor, what dude did was hit all those ERA’s and make them explode leaving fuel tanks, and other systems discovered.
High rate of fire keeping the tank off balance abd preventing them from being able to bring the heavier armorment to bear!
That ERA was working as intended, but only for however long it could last considering one Bradley was laying into the T-90m…..and there was two in the area.
The guy who leaked files about T90M
"They call me mad man"
Esse blindado Bradley é animal quando atira no modo intermitente derruba qualquer blindado
I remember pro Russian propagandists saying the Bradley is nothing but a glorified jeep
These Ukrainians can make omelettes without eggs... imagine if they had eggs!
I'm proud to help such brave and resourceful people...🇵🇹🇪🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸
At least we don’t have to pay to recycle and demolish old vehicles and munitions, at least somebody can get a use from them. I don’t think the majority of our country realizes how much money we actually spend on just retiring old equipment so this is a win win in my book
Misleading, the tank survived, it didn't get obliterated.
Well the Bradley itself didn't destroy it, there is no way a 25 mm cannon can destroy an MBT's frontal armor. Rather than showing how "bad" the T-90M is, it shows how bad russian crew training is
Source: my (as impartial as can be) opinion
Who knew a BB gun could actually take out a freight train
Outstanding
The horror for those folks
The Russians' biggest problem with the equipment is that it is made in Russia…
View port of the t90: FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇦🇺🇦👍
Why as that big blast away from the tank? It doesn't look like the T-90 got destroyed. More like a part its explosive armour blew outwards. And the fact the video ended before we could see the aftermath of that blast makes me think it wasn't destroyed.
10 months later and this seems so ridiculous.
"Prepare to meet your maker!"
- Top 5 quotes made before disaster
The initial series of smaller explosions, which I discern to be high-explosive (HE) rounds, with sharp bursts of sound and fiery flashes, signaling the onset of combat. Following these, the resounding detonation, echoing through the battlefield like a thunderclap, marks the activation of the T-90's reactive armor, a last-ditch defense mechanism against incoming threats. Despite the chaos erupting around it, the T-90 emerges from the tumult relatively unscathed, a testament to its robust design and the skill of its crew in navigating the hazards of modern warfare.
Oh look, thats us in Multicrew Tank Combat 4 😂
The explosion was from the ERA blocks not from the inside, tank turret rotated because the gunner left the controller and escape
It’s like Hulk Hogan getting kicked in the head 50 times by Bruce Lee
He fed the snail
They blinded the tank. They destroyed all the cameras on the outside leaving the gunner and driver both blinded and deafened. Everyone lived from this encounter. T-90 hits a tree and gets stuck so the crew bails and runs. The Bradley's reposition to avoid any possible counter fire.
"All iron burns the same"
"the Bradley is definitely not a tank"
it did not obliterate the tank, the T90 has reactive armor that works like flairs. The t90 also first got hit from a FPV drone and had it turret disabled, then the Bradley was taking shots at the front of the tank that isn't even penetrationmable from a Bradly. The American Abram tank legit died to a single drone and grenades. (Also the T90 crew survived and was towed back for repairs and was back on the front line)
Dude, the Bradley hit the most important components like Fire Controls System and the Hydraulics. You haven’t seen it
The crew of that Russian Tank was captured and the T-90 later got obliterated by a Drone.
@@Romanov117 yea it disabled the tank but there was no fire or any smoke afterwards, and the drone hit it first then the Bradley came later, the crew did not get captured i do not know where you heard that from
@@Romanov117 also an American Abram tank got killed with one drone
@@Romanov117 an second Abram once got killed with one shot from a T72
@@Justinianthegreat09 are you being salty how much the T-90’s haven’t shown dominance over the Battlefield that the Abrams still remain the superior vehicle under NATO hands.
Let me tell you one thing, is that you’re cheering over weakened Ukraine in February and now they’re pushing back in Ivaniske because the U.S. Aid is coming back.
Most likely 1 bradley because shots came from only one direction. They could've been side by side but the tracers say that only one Bradley was presently fighting the T90M
Obliterate?.....
Thank you
A fitting term based on what is shown in the video. Did you have a more eloquent or accurate way of describing it? Or... no, you just came here to say "really tho??? Look how smart I am."
I mean, it's "the most advanced" russian tank vs 40 years old IFV. And IFV won.
Isn't that a IR flare and not a ammo cookoff
"It a troop carrier not a tank" ahh moment
Are you joking
POV you unlock the M42 Duster on War thunder in the American tree
It didn't destroyed the T90 though but it destroyed all of their optics blinding the tank and immobilizing of which the crew had to abandoned it
So basically it got destroyed because the tank was rendered useless… 😂 when you wreck your car it doesn’t have to turn into a crushed coke can to be considered a totaled vehicle. This tank was busted beyond repair regardless if the hatch flew off the tank and it completely blew up sky high. 😂
@@XoKingChaseXo wth are you even saying the tank is basically just blinded and at longer version of the video the tank rammed into a tree and all crew came out and abandoned it
You used that word first. Nobody said it was destroyed. It was obliterated 100%. You're strawmanning.
@@youaveragegamer3746His point stands, the tank was taken out of the fight and won't be returning anytime soon, if ever. By all metrics it was effectively destroyed.
Reminds me of how insurance classified a car as totaled. A tank doesn't have to blow up like a Michael bay movie to be considered "destroyed". Granted the word inoperable would better describe what happened
the thing is this tank was taken out of action just by what we see in the video. And was made into scrap with the drones later on. So it was destroyed by every definition of the word. Just not in the video
Although the reputation of the T-90 was destroyed by this video.
I hate to be the one that points this out, but tank did its job and protected the crew, the explosion off the turret was the smoke grenades as you can as the T-90M is still moving around… yes I call it a win for the Bradley but the T-90M wasn’t destroyed by a Bradley it was destroyed by a Drone
I wonder if the Bradleys were out of TOWs or if they didn’t want to risk stopping to take a shot. Either way being in that tank would be scary asf
Engagement was too close and fast paced for TOWs, and there were too many obstacles that could cut the TOW lines
The accuracy of that fncking thing..
This is the famous tank (or military technical) battle in this war
It's just luck. Direct confrontation also depends on the level of experience of the crew and gunner. But honestly, if the Bradley is hit by a T90 shell, there is no chance of survival, but if the T90 is hit by a Bradley shell in a vulnerable spot, then there will be problems, for example, it cannot be controlled. In short, tanks are still better in terms of protection and firepower. You can't use a rare case to make a general assessment. So what should we say when many tanks are taken down by a soldier using a shoulder-mounted anti-tank gun? Is it true that the soldier is more powerful than the tank???
I didnt know tanks actually exploded like that
Please don't forget that the guy inside the tank is likely forced into the war and is a human just like you
So this is what hms hood looked like when she sank
Everyone in that Russian tank is def those Bushmaster rounds are massive
Gotta love how this is a perfect example of explosive reactive armor stopping smaller rounds and the west thinks the tank is blowing up even thought they are still driving around and firing back and leave the fight and limp back to base all alive.
in the video you can see the turret spinning and then the crew jumps out of the tank… it didnt limo back XD. 🤡
Many people think that the last explosion was tank getting destroyed but reality is it was probably a smoke granade getting lauched by the crew or possible because of the bradley shot at the end bradley couldn't destroy the tank but letter got destoryed by a drone
Guys in my opinion the fog throwers got a hit and explode not the tank .
Tank got disabled it can't be useful it's not destroyed but not in working condition as well parts are damaged even millitary can't fix this tank now soon it can captured by Ukraine or soon it will held as memorial victory over russia
@@Agamjot677u ukrain cant recover what is on lost ground . They are retreating everywhere they are surrendering
@@wernerhofgartner en tu mente
It craves violence.
I wonder what the pentagon wars fans think about this.
speed does it all
Lol can u imagine the noise inside that tank I bet they re all deaf and had they’re brains scrambled from that 25mm.
they have nice headphones, but the vibrations would be crazy
7687 Maximillian Ports
It’s just armored vehicles not tank 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Average level 5 at top tier with a premium vehicle
How come they didnt use their Tow missiles?
bradley needed to be update ngl in warthunder
Too many young people caught up in this
Cool but seriously next time carry an anti tank weapon
TOW missile needs a certain distance to arm
Looks like a training issue for the russians rather than a technical problem... They should have not be at close quarter with the bradley. And the tank was disabled. Not destroyed.
the bradley didnt even use its anti tank missles
Possibly hit a weakspot
It wasnt obliterated, the exploding you see is the reactive armor. Bradley basically did nothing to it, just damages the optics.
Shut up loser
The gunner said he knew where the weak spot was because of video games 😅😅😅😅 what a g
30 busmaster useless against tanks like t90m thats why bradleys equipped with anti thank missiles, the tank destroyed by 3 fpv after the crew unharmed abandoned
Hey, don’t count out the old stuff. I mean, I wouldn’t want to be shot at by a Bradley.