The History Of Nuclear Power | The Atom & Us | Spark
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Action-packed tour through the history of one of the most controversial subjects of the 20th
century - nuclear power - as told by those who experienced it first-hand. Focusing on events in
the US, UK, France and Germany, it charts its social and political development from the early
days of post-war atomic euphoria, through to the struggling ‘nuclear renaissance’ of the present
day.
---
Subscribe to Spark for more amazing science, tech & engineering videos: goo.gl/LIrlur 🚀
Join the Spark Channel Membership to get access to perks:
/ @sparkdocs
Find us on:
Facebook: / sparkdocs
Instagram: / spark_channel
Any queries, please contact us at: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
#Spark #nuclear #oppenheimer 
Наука
![Roddy Ricch - Survivors Remorse [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/J5IeFzr2GgE/mqdefault.jpg)
Germany saying no to nuclear energy then burning millions of tons of coal makes NO sense at all.
and at same time importing ton of electricity from FR where its produced in nuclear reactors...
@@B4rr4cudk4 YES that as well !
No one ever said Germany 🇩🇪 had any sense left either..
@@jayspik6498people are stupid everywhere. There's ones out there saying you can pick being a guy or girl and all sorts of other nonsense
@@wades623What is it with you clowns bringing your antitrans bs everywhere. It is not the big issue you think it is.
Germany led the world in manufacturing solar PV and have some of the highest installed renewable capacity of anywhere but still emits on average around 5 times more CO2 per unit of power than france
haha Germany pushed the solar panels and now the solar panel benefit ended and they trash them in masses. Not sure where the video to this is now.
It is not 5 time, it is 40 times
A Harvard study attributes around 8 million deaths per year, to burning fossil fuels, and although very low renewables have historically caused more deaths per unit of electricity generated than nuclear energy. Atomic power, despite all the accidents, fear and bad press is the safest and most reliable energy technology.
everyone remembers fukusima, not the tsunami that leveled huge areas and caused so much destruction and loss of life. I still dont quite understand why Germany got afraid of nuclear after fukusima, its not like is on one of the most active tectonic plates ... just mental
what about nuclear waste?
@@B4rr4cudk4 because tsunami is a nature made and you can't control it while fukishima was a human made problem
A red herring. Solvable. @@wiezyczkowata
@@wiezyczkowataWhat about the radioactive and lethally toxic renewables waste being dumped into rivers in China?
Nuclear is the way. Fission now, fusion in the future.
Have there been any advancements in containing nuclear fusion yet?
The voices of fear are louder than the voices of common sense
They alway were. But why listen to peaple who have nothing to say?
Nuclear is the future. But use thorium reactors.
BBC 4 did an excellent program called inside sellafield, where the staff were absolutely committed to cleaning it up and fixing the mistakes of the past. Dealing with the waste problem. And the waste is a problem. It showed footage of the huge ponds there that are leaking currently and the robotic arms they use to take out the material to store in concrete boxes on site. The other facility they have reprocesses used fuel and vitrify the 3 percent that’s left (high end waste) and that’s stored in another building on site and it’s more than a swimming pools worth. It’s this part that needs to be solved safely, because Nuclear power is part of the energy solution. Definitely.
Well, we haven't solved that problem in over 60 years... (vitrification and burying it is _not_ a solution; that's making a mess for the future.)
IF you can believe government propaganda. Sov said Chernobyl was safe and no problem back when it exploded until they couldn't deny the truth anymore.
Young, smart, courageous people will make the future. Other people will make whiney videos saying it cannot be done 🙄
One thing is for certain, we need a form of energy production that emits little to no carbon dioxide. Solar and wind have come a long way and definitely have a role to play in the bigger picture. However they will always be dependent upon the weather. Fusion is and often jokingly always said to be 20 years away. Traditional nuclear energy must be given a second look. Thorium seems to hold a lot of potential and so does modular reactor technology.
Exactly, well said, however, the fossil fuel interests capture of governments and spreading of FUD will probably mean we will have to go through an energy crisis before much happens.
Also there's a bug movement of water through Germany some big rivers and lakes all of these waterways have hydroectric powerstations but also they have a high density population in some key areas and then ery large outstretched farmland with areas of natural resources that are not so heavily managed as the other country's in Europe forestry management also produces a lot of fuels bio fuels that are collected from waste wood chip there's a lot of methods of producing fuel but all these fuels are so very basic but the hydroelectricity is a big thing when there's such big rivers available to use
@@jimgraham6722 Totally agree with both of you's.. The problem is & has always been the people in power with the greed they have, they crave for that dollar worse than a crackhead & the crackhead person is the worse of the worse human on the planet.. These people make a crackhead look like a beautyful butterfly, they are the worse cáncer the world has seen on the earth.. The crackhead has a problem a diciease that can be helped but these people just don't care about nothing or no one only the money...Also they have technology that's 100 times better & clean, the motor that runs on water or the motor that can run 400 or 500 Miles a gallon but no way are they going to do that & miss out on all the billion's of dollars that Cars) SUV's that run just 10 Miles a gallon can make them.... It's all about the powerfull dollars..🤯😂😂😂
Humans are the cáncer of the planet!!
All for a piece of paper, how much is enough?? Crazy what will we/they are going to leave behind for our/their children and their childrens childrens, a planet with just pictures of the white rino & hundres of other animals that we have killed of to extinción it's just so sad.
Blessings to you all from Puerto Rico with lot's of love..Love one another & the mother earth like you love your childrens & family.... The material world is going to stay behind when you die si live for others & i ganranty that your life will be so much beautyful, wonderful,rewarding...❤😂
I would say we need an energy economy that produces NO toxic byproducts. Carbon is certainly the buzzword of the day, but _current_ generation nuclear power creates some of the nastiest stuff in the universe. It doesn't matter that it's "low volume", or great efforts are taken to safely contain that waste (most of the time, anyway... there have been the notable oopsies over the decades) when it remain dangerous well beyond any human understanding. Fusion would be a good option... if we can ever crack that nut. As you mention, thorium is the path we should've always taken, but people funding the (early) research want to make bombs, and thorium reactors can't do that.
@@jfbeamNuclear waste is managed so safely and cleanly that it’s hardly an issue. The nuclear waste situation was solved decades ago.
Nuclear power is the way forward, the stigma around it needs to go
I appreciate your materials... but I would prefer instead of subtitles all of them with voiceovers then it would be possible to listen to it like a podcast while driving in the car...
Really a pick your poison situation. To die slowly or quickly in order to power the world’s computer phones😂
And Bitcoin mining
Funny how this Program wants to make it look
like the nuclear fearing hippies were right all along,
somehow overlooking the 30-40 years between the
anti-nuclear movement starting and renewables becoming
an at least somewhat reasonable alternative.
Oh well, lots of People also think Greta Tungberg's
"I'm gonna act like a petulant child until somebody does something"
is new, inspiring & helpful.
28:30 holyshit! He had a raccoon living in his left eyebrow named spunker.
In the U.S. look to VC Summer and Vogtle for why nuclear power is a bad idea. VC Summer nuclear units cancelled in 2017 after spending BILLIONS and Vogtle spent $35 billion for two units and #4 is still not operating. Vogtle is (per MW generated) the world's most expensive power plant
Well, that's the results of anti-nuclear, NIMBY's going back to the 70's. We (US) have only built (or "finished") a few new reactors in decades. Plenty were licensed for construction ~20 years ago, but all of them were canceled or abandoned. As far as I've followed, only _one_ new reactor has joined the US grid. Vogtle was an 80's construction that was "going to be" completed, but as you mention still isn't.
@@jfbeam Just saying something does not make it true. In the southeastern U.S there is 100% political and public support for nuclear. Unless you call 5 hippies an anti-nuclear group, there is NO opposition to new nuclear. Vogtle and VC Summer started their nuclear projects at the same time. VC Summer abandoned their project after spending 17 BILLION with no end in sight and Vogtle is now 7 years behind schedule and 120% over budget. All the problems were construction and project management related NOT NIMBY or anti-nuclear. READ facts instead of believing social media
@@clarkkent9080 I suggest you do a little (more?) research. There are still organizations that actively oppose new nuclear projects. It's not like the 70's and 80's where people block roads, occupy construction sites, etc. Today we sue! While that usually doesn't stop anything, it does drag things out, and inflate costs. Every utility quotes costs, and power need projections for the reasons - even back in the 70's - because they don't want to admit public opposition has any effect.
Go ask the citizens of Cherokee County SC (Gaffney SC what they think (thought) about Duke's plans to revive that site. Nobody wanted it. Everyone questioned why the f*** you'd build a 2MW site _HERE_ - the edge of nowhere. In the 70s and 80s, sure, there's textile mills everywhere. 2000-2020, there aren't even farms out there. And the Broad River? VERY. BAD. CHOICE. for your primary cooling source. I have pictures of it bone dry! It's also the water source of every city along it's banks. Of course, there was no mass protests, because they rightly assumed it would go the same way... and it did. They didn't even clear the trees.
(A few years back, they rebuilt the coal plant at Cliffside NC. That's plenty of power for what has remained in the area. Including the FB and Apple data centers.)
I have worked on all the Nuclear Power Stations in the UK That are all safe
what about nuclear waste? how safe it is?
Had you worked in the nuclear power plants that were not safe, you wouldn't be posting about it anywhere let alone being able to place the word safe and nuclear together in one sentence!
If it is handled correctly its safe@@wiezyczkowata
@@britengineerinmindanaothep9376 problem is there is a lot of people who are in charge that will be willing to cut corners...
In France, atomic not be Always profitable and it is subsidise by the State, but it protect the économie and it is a strategic matter
1) The number of deadly nuclear power accidents can be counted on one hand, actually, one finger, Chernobyl. Those that caused a serious release of radiation into the environment can be counted on two hands, the majority of which were early experimental reactor accidents. Only Chernobyl and Fukushima were true nuclear disasters. 1a) Chernobyl's accident was caused by incompetent operations employees doing a very dangerous test incorrectly, a test that would never have been tried anywhere else other than with a small, experimental reactor. 1b) The RBMK reactor design built at Chernobyl was an inherently unstable design with no redundancy built in. Only the old Soviet Union ever built this type of reactor, most of which have been shut down long ago. 1c) Today's modern reactor designs are stable using basic physics principles that make them inherently stable, the main thing that needs to be controlled is keeping the coolant pressurization, levels, and flow.
2) Far more deaths, injuries, illness, and environmental damage has been caused by fossil fuel use in the same period of time that nuclear power has been in existence.
3) The physical amount of nuclear waste that has ever been produced can fit into a single sports stadium. Most of it is lower-level waste, the really nasty stuff can fit into one olympic swimming pool.
This is an old documentary rife with misinformation and a lack of understanding of how nuclear power plants actually work.
What's Fukushima?
the amount of people affected by Chernobyl and who still are till this day can't be counted on one hand...
@@wiezyczkowata this is true but pales in comparison to the number of people that have a lower life expectancy and diminished quality of life as a result of burning fossil fuels.
@@sammorrow8420 tell that to citizens of neighborly countries of Ukraine that has higher then normal cases of thyroid cancer as a result of Chernobyl...
@@wiezyczkowata It would definitely take less time than telling many millions more who suffer due to fossil fuels. Plus the old method of nuclear power was chosen so that our power hungry governments would have tens of thousands of world ending bombs. Even back then there was a safer way to extract energy from the atom but was abandoned due to political and military reasons. If we continue to bury our collective heads in the sand, countries like China will export that technology at a very high price. Not to mention the price we will pay ignoring climate change cuz those who stand to profit in the short term are spending billions to lie to the public.
First NPP in the world was in Obninsk, Russia, AMB reractor, RBMK type. June of 1954.
Without nuclear energy to power industry and the economy, the next best bet is to export all your industries to countries with the needed power capacity, and to depopulate your country so less energy is needed.
It seems these things are happening.
Mankinds Nuclear Enigma. 🌐
Carbon free power in gigawatts. What's not to like? These ain't bombs, a critical bomb is a hard problem, that's why only a few have them. Burning coal is worse
My question is who was paying Greenpeace to focus on Nuclear power while ignoring fossil fuels?
Ignorance is bliss
Greenpeace also highlighted fossil fuels. Sadly, fossil fuels have a higher installed base, and are three times cheaper than nuclear, so they have been harder to shift.
That is changing. The renewables that were made fun of in the 20th century have gotten progressively better and cheaper.
New generation is increasingly renewable, fossil new build is slowing and nuclear has been in decline for thirty years.
I think your question is misplaced. Who has been paying politicians to favour centralised power generation? Easily monopolised, and easy to hold a nation to ransom for increased contracts..
It's making a huge comeback. By a nuclear worker 😊 ✌️
😂
“Idk about using fire to cook food….that stuff seems sooooo dangerous and expensive - let’s keep eating it raw: it’s safer this way”
“Idk about washing your hands constantly - that seems expensive and dangerous…let’s keep praying to god: it’s safer that way”
“Idk about (insert practical sciences) - I’ll point out minor issues blown out of proportion while ignoring major flaws in our current way of doing things…let’s not change our minds after learning new information: I’d rather live in fear about new technology than pay any mind to how my current behavior is damaging my life and those around me”
I don't know about flying on planes, there have been so many crashes and thousands of deaths. JK, I'm a pilot and go flying all the time!
🤣Exactly! And Spark can make a documentary about how a caveman burned his-self. And how cave-boy was frightened because daddy burned his-self. But the documentary will not cover the generations of cave-people who died because they could not cook food. Just like this propaganda film fails to show the MEGATONS of carbon spewed when America turned to coal. (and then China followed with more and more coal.)
Wow. Bernard Ingham has the bushiest eyebrows I've ever seen. A bird could be nesting in them lol. Way to go bloke.
Thereneed to have regulations, the would have componies thaking shortcuts in safety. Used fuel rods could reprocessed into new fuel rods
3.6.... not great, not terrible
Anatoly Dyatlov
16:28 US didn't discover fission at all
Verdade
Black bling bling plz
👍🏻👍🏻
I don’t see how nuclear can win in the market place since it’s sooooo expensive to build and takes 1-2 decades to construct
What if inspired people can do for nuclear energy as SPACEX has done for rockets?
@@jwestney2859 then I guess nuclear would make more sense, but then you can say that about renewables or battery storage
@@njm543 Copenhagen Atomics is one of MANY teams working to create the safe affordable reactors that were first built at Oak Ridge 60 years ago. That development was killed by Richard Nixon because of politics.
@@jwestney2859 and no companies are working on improving renewables?
@@njm543 I do everything I can for solar, and for wind. Also for batteries. My fave battery team is called Ambri. The chemistry they have created fascinates me! They have a pilot installation in Aurora Colorado. In my dream I will visit this installation. My big dream is that 8 billion people on earth can have energy abundance, and that we can stop global warming at the same time. To do this we need wind and solar and batteries and old nuclear power and a whole new te-invented nuclear power. It will take everybody to make it happen. That is my wish and my dream. 🤗
I didn't like nuclear power to i was very anxious about it, but i have seen a lot of documentaries and read lots of information because i'm a very curious man , how each generation of reactors became safer and safer and how bad Fukushima Diachi and Vladimir Lenon Nuclear Power plant accidents were we still learned a great deal from it, unforntunately with the costs of lives and environmental issues, thats something we should never forget but can also take it with us to make it safer & safer.
But it could help us face out fossil fuels because the next generation of Thorium reactors and Small Modular Reactors could make the industry extremely safe without any Toxi Waste Created.
After seeking a lot of information about the subject, my interests shifted and i'm pleeing for nuclear energy, only the worst problem about nuclear energy is, that it is incredibly expensive
its not really that expencive in the grand scheme of things the only major costs are in cutting though all the red tape the activists put up
Isn't it funny how Blair went from anti to pro?
Element 115 ?? What about it ?
Wait a few milliseconds & it won't be a problem anymore
I am always dumbfounded by how many seemingly intelligent people can't pronounce nuclear...even people in the field
Sounds right to me.
Is it Nuc-lear or Nu-clear?
If nuclear power made economic sense, more reactors would be built. The main problem is it's the most expensive way to produce electricity.
Actually, it's not, but there is a huge upfront cost, and you have to get it paste the "hippies" that don't what it in their backyard. (and their backyard is the entire planet) Over a half-century plus of operation, they produce some seriously profitable electricity. (1000MW for 50 years, even assuming 20% downtime for maintenance and refueling is still damn cheap power.)
@@jfbeam Actually, it is.
"successful" operation of a plant depends on many subsidies: Guaranteed purchase contracts, guaranteed price floors, exemption from spent fuel disposal costs, exemption from public liability insurance, "tax incentives", quite apart from capital loan guarantees or forgiveness.
The most common reason for nuclear closures in the US this century is "operational losses", followed closely by "repairs" and "low wholesale prices".
Nuclear cannot compete, and it cannot even break even without price subsidies.
Bye bye nuclear....
we are gonna build mre of those nUCUlar power plantzzzzz
The cosmos, an expanse beyond human comprehension, has intrigued and inspired generations with its enigmatic beauty and unfathomable complexity. At the heart of our understanding lies a singular theory that has revolutionized our perception of the universe
Gee, what a totally unbiased documentary. /s
I went to a catholic school and have seen documentaries about abortion less biased than this.
I'd like to know, from all the anti-nuclear 'people', how many deaths do you believe you are responsible for, given that there are tens of thousands more deaths each year caused by your preferred power source, coal and oil, than have been caused by nuclear in all of history?
German opposition to nuclear is a real disappointment. Fewer nations would benefit more from nuclear power.
Safe?
Where are they putting all the spent nuclear rods?
😂 whats your solution People complain about global warming. We have a solution, but the solution is not what they want. So they complain without giving another solution
@@2ndAmendmentMF one child per couple till the population reaches normality.
@@christianheidt5733 😂
Underground repository in a geologically stable area.
Exactly; environmentalists always crying the sky's falling without proposing a viable solution. Not helpful.@@2ndAmendmentMF
I am horrified by the ignorance of humans to understand the basic principals of atomic reaction and implement them for "Grater Good".
Hmm doesnt really sound like an objective coverage. I think what the people say should be weighted more proper with the facts. E.g. the explosion in Tjernobyl wasnt a nuclear explosion, but a steam explosion. And "doing homework and finding the danger" doesnt really sound like doing your homework well. Whats the alternative? Coal, Gas? Both increase the radiotion level of the environment way more, let alone the particulate matter it releases. An objective story would weigh both sides.
45:51 Don't you mean an GE reactor? You can't get much more west than the US.
Everything great the US makes (even though a lot of it came from the UK) is amazing.
Everything bad the US makes is someone else's problem or they twisting words so they don't look bad.
now they have decided to build more while promoting ev cars and now AI data centres need alot of power too. no idea why they don't promote true renewable enengy
My only friend is nuclear
Can't have nuclear power ... can't have fossil fuels power???
the french were quick to develop nuclear power to get the bomb so they would never be occupied again !!!
crib told currency see
Go nuclear, or go home.
That was Ronald Reagan?
You mean the trader who negotiated with the Iran government who took those hostages in late 70's till the early 80's to delay releasing those hostages till after the election so he'd have a better chance wining that election? The same one who limited funding for the development of the Space Shuttle with the result of lowering safety and making the program cost more in the long run? Or perhaps the same president that spread the lie that giving the rich more money by lowering their taxes and breaking up unions that were fighting for their fair share of the profits in the form of better pay and benefits on the hope that these same greedy self centered individuals will share those benefits with the workers that were being exploited by those same rich business owners? Then yes, I believe it was.
A wonderful insight ...
And here we are in Australia giving the US $370B to build 7 Neuclear Submarines as our best Defence Strategy ...
Requiring Weapons grade Uranium .. A technology the here in OZ, We do not even possess ...
Its called "the AUKUS deal"
AUS, US n UK ..
Our Prime minister at the time of signing was(still is) a Total Megalomaniac .. Scott Morrison ..
He was awarded a medal by Joe Biden .. for his service 😢
There is a kind of weirdness about it. I am very surprised however, Morrison did not propose coal fired submarines, he could have tossed in the lump of coal he carries around in his pocket.
That why, the French didn't see it coming and coudn't understand the décision
The World's Fair in Seattle, Washington State (USA), and many animated videos from Walt Disney were NOT propaganda but educational for all.
фильм для тиктокеров! первая в мире атомная электростанция находится в Москве!
People who want to end nuclear power should not complain when their lefty coastal cities get flooded out due to the icecaps melting
My mother worked at a University in the US. Her Department Head had been exposed to the Atom Bomb fallout.
Years later he developed cancer and when he died, a box of teeth and whole fingernails and toe nails were found in his desk drawer. He and his wife had one child but he had some birth defects.
Side note: There was a literal lead brick that was used as a door stop in the copier room of the office.
Someone along the line found out its origins and was concernes that it was probably radioactive so they a count on it and pretty soon it was removed.
The real kicker was, it was an Engineering college that studied metals.
History of nuclear power, history of uneducated masses against few highly specialised peaple. and lot of money on both sides....
This a biased review.
Calder Hall Calder Hall Calder Hall
sos sos sos
You should be using a voice as a translator, not just subtitles. Not everyone (like me) watches this long video to read some subtitles. And you must also skip all the music from your contents. They are really ayyoning, most of the times I close the video just because of the added music
Lol you have a hard time reading this is a problem!
I found the music very fitting, it wasn't annoying filler content but rather protest songs relevant to the times
I belong to a group of people that listen only to most of the videos on RUclips in the background while doing other things, especially when the video is more informative than entertaining such as this one. Rather than addressing the difference in preferences, you insult @shahidanwer72475. Do you lack understanding of that preference or insist on forcing others to adopt your choice by attempting to shame them? The editor / editors on this channel often do a bad job on these videos by elevating the volume of the music over the speakers making it difficult to hear what they are saying. I put up with this annoyance because I enjoy the information presented. I value my time and multitask while listening. To each their own,
@christopherlastname7638. 🤨
Stop Press! What an incredible ‘co-incidence’ that a few weeks after the blockbuster anti-nuclear-power movie ‘The China Syndrome’ came out, an almost impossible ‘valve failure’ occured at three mile island. Oh, and the other amazing ‘co-incidence’ was that the relevant ‘alarm indicator’ in the control room was ‘invisible’ due to a label covering it that related to some kind of service. Had the indicator been seen, we would never have heard about a dangerous accident because it could have been dealt with quickly. At the time Nuclesr was on a role, being more reliable, polution free, and competatively priced than coal, oil and gas. This amazing set of coincidences had unbelievably bad consequences for Nuclesr, and saved ‘big fossil’ ... WHAT A COINCIDENCE!
There were a certain pair of brothers who had made billions out of coal mining who might have been involved.
Same as Cole we should stop using cole
It's coal...not cole...smh
You should get into spelling and stop using the youtube comment section
Yeah Cole is a cool dude; we should respect him and not use him.
I am into whale oil. These mighty creatures are God's gift to humanity for home lighting.
open closed nuke power plants
15 minutes in and it seems this is another anti nuclear documentary. Surprised Greta didnt show up.
my speech are constitution : i have one smart question only which is : what is the different between nuclear energy as well as atomic energy and hydrogenic energy ? genius phycisist from the brave iraq 🇮🇶 🇮🇶 🇮🇶
Poles and power lines. While free energy was known by Nikola tesla 😂😊😮
Ohhhh Suuuuure!
NOTHING is ever free people still need to be paid so they can eat and everything else ! ! £500.00 bet you are NOT working for free else you would NOT be able to be here to watch this video.
@@publicmail2😐😑 sheeeep
all right then, build as many nuclear power plant as we can, don't worry about it waste, we gonna make do with hundreds and thousands years effect from it"
Nuclear waste is a red herring, as solutions are already available. Second, nuclear waste decays over time. The waste from mining and building solar panels and batteries doesn't decay, those hazardous elements will be around forever; and carelessly stored around the world making for thousands of toxic waste sites. All the high-level nuclear fuel ever created could fit on a football field stacked 50ft high. That could all be buried in situ at the nuclear power plant. Problem solved.
What about waste fly ash from coal plants? We just pile it up and let it blow all over the place. Contains radioactive materials and heaps of carcinogens. They are responsible for most of the cancer we experience today.
We shouldn't have gotten into nuclear energy
Yes we should have the problem is regulates should be in place ! We have ships and submarines powered by nuclear there's nothing wrong with nuclear the problem is we still use old nuclear power plants with no hope of a new one there going to run these planes to the ground! If you think solar power or wind power can keep up your varie wrong! The push to get off Cole and gas all when pushing electric cars giving up your gas stove what will power all that because there already maxed out !
What's wrong with nuclear? Perhaps instead of coal, humans should have continued burning dung for fuel.
The bottom line is Nuclear Power is the most expensive and dangerous way mankind has come up with to boil water
Expensive to build, but not to operate
SpaceX should design a rocket to fling the high level nuclear waste into deep space.
Given SpaceX history of rockets exploding while on their journey, it might be a bad idea for those living near the possible fallout area. 🤔
Not viable. And why bother, proven underground storage is available.
it makes scense German are determined to destroy earth.
Phu《k Ralph Nader. Mamala's boi