the way you edited it so Link's rankings started at 100 and ended at 0 and then Rhett's starting at 0 and going to 100, encapsulated the two so perfectly in such a subtle way👌👌
I definitely like rhett's answers more, He was way more consistent with his inital reaction correlating to scores. Yes he rates higher, but I think he just sees everything under 50 actuall unpleasant to eat, which happens less than things being nice to eat in our food bussiness.
not necessarily. just because Rhett's answer's skew high doesn't make Link's more statistically useful. it is their own opinions, and we already know Rhett is the more positive and likes to eat.
What I'm learning is that Link's scores are actually better and more evenly distributed across the board (like a bell curve), whereas Rhett's are more biased toward higher numbers. I guess Rhett needs the scoring help chart
Well, yeah, but if you think about it, 0 on the scale should be absolutely awful, like something you scavenge from the trash in a pretty warm day, while 100 is god's nectar. They are trying commercialized products, so it's normal that the average score would be in the higher side...? I mean, on 0-100 scale, the passing vote would be 60/66 and most of Link's votes are between 69 and 29. Does it seems logic that he failed most of the foods he eats? He's more consistent, but simply because the scale isn't actually the ideal for this kind of products.
@@LoScribacchino link thinks of 0 as kinda bad, and thinks of 100 as an unattainable perfect food, instead of thinking of 50 as the base, like rhett does
I know and appreciate all the data and shenanigans in this video. But I kept getting distracted with how handsome Rhett looked in the Monster Energy and Oreo episodes.
The funniest thing for me is that link multiple times gets cuts off from saying his score, idk I find that funny😅 Also wth?! the amount of time and effort this must have taken to organize and edit,respect.
Just because link uses more numbers doesn’t mean his answers are better, I feel like rhetts are better just because he has the same emotion every time he says the same number but like will be like 🤢62🤢 but to something else he’ll be like 😮😮🥰🥰😍62‼️💞💞💞
@@justink.howlett9152 sounds like someone must have flunked out of middle school statistics if you don’t know what mean, median, and mode are. Or do they not teach you that in America? Maybe not old enough to be in middle school?
some of links scores are pretentious and a little random but rhett was in his 70's a little more than halfway through, that makes most of his scores above 50, which either means he really likes the food (which now that im writing it down, it makes sense, rhett sure does love his food) or he's inaccurate with his scores, they mostly have to rely on link to give accurate scores so they all arent super high.
@@LoScribacchino except they're trying to find the best product that the famous brand sells, so instead of giving something that doesnt taste that great a one and then giving the half decent ones a much better score, he should be giving more divergent scores like link.
It definitely tracks that Rhett’s scores skew high since he will eat basically anything.
why has no one commented on how freaking funny it is when rhett and link are sped up while rhett tries to break link's finger lmaoooo
Yes... Best part!!
Catch the fish with Grandad!
It's here if you want the non-sped up version: ruclips.net/video/d1a3KIYrdUA/видео.html
the way you edited it so Link's rankings started at 100 and ended at 0 and then Rhett's starting at 0 and going to 100, encapsulated the two so perfectly in such a subtle way👌👌
Compared to Link, Rhett was less all over the board. Link gave nearly every number 0-100. Rhett gave 80% of his scores over 50.
Catch the fish with grandad is so funny
yeah but he a hungry boy... he likes to eat sometimes tooo fast
I definitely like rhett's answers more, He was way more consistent with his inital reaction correlating to scores. Yes he rates higher, but I think he just sees everything under 50 actuall unpleasant to eat, which happens less than things being nice to eat in our food bussiness.
I never would have imagined that Link would have the more statistically reliable answers lmao (those guide boards really help)
not necessarily. just because Rhett's answer's skew high doesn't make Link's more statistically useful. it is their own opinions, and we already know Rhett is the more positive and likes to eat.
@@maevekirkland9452 yeah, Rhett's is internally consistent
74-78
Rhett: "Wow this is the greatest thing I've ever tasted"
79
Rhett: "Eh, pretty good"
This was great thank you for spending a probly unnecessary large amount of time on this video. I really enjoyed this
Minion mode activated at 1:32
2x speed it also lol
Both of your videos on this are great. I'd love to see what they think about this. I also appreciate the statistical analysis done, very nice.
The fact that everyone at GMM craps on link for his scoring system but yet he nearly has a perfect bell curve makes me furious for some reason.
This is a fun channel you've created! Thanks, this is so cool!
If u listen to it sped up it sounds like a very strange auctioneer whose very thorough.
What I'm learning is that Link's scores are actually better and more evenly distributed across the board (like a bell curve), whereas Rhett's are more biased toward higher numbers.
I guess Rhett needs the scoring help chart
Well, yeah, but if you think about it, 0 on the scale should be absolutely awful, like something you scavenge from the trash in a pretty warm day, while 100 is god's nectar. They are trying commercialized products, so it's normal that the average score would be in the higher side...? I mean, on 0-100 scale, the passing vote would be 60/66 and most of Link's votes are between 69 and 29. Does it seems logic that he failed most of the foods he eats? He's more consistent, but simply because the scale isn't actually the ideal for this kind of products.
@@LoScribacchino link thinks of 0 as kinda bad, and thinks of 100 as an unattainable perfect food, instead of thinking of 50 as the base, like rhett does
@@Badusername2000 Except Link has actually given a score of 100 before and Rhett technically hasn't gone higher than 96 except as a joke.
Whereas Link only missed using 5 of the numbers, Rhett missed using a whopping 21 numbers on the 1-100 scale. Sorry, it's my OCD taking over.
nice toes, lol 😁😁👃🏼👃🏼👅👅
that seems incorrect. I feel like link missed most of the 90s
8:20 makes me laugh everytime😹
This had to of took so long.this us awesome. Do one for link
Links came before rhetts. Just go to his guys channel.
I'm impressed that it's in order. Good job! 👍
I never though i would be watching videos of rhett and link counting but here I am
“It’s better than not good, 51” -Rhett 5:46
54 was such a confident number omg. also thank you for this
I know and appreciate all the data and shenanigans in this video. But I kept getting distracted with how handsome Rhett looked in the Monster Energy and Oreo episodes.
The funniest thing for me is that link multiple times gets cuts off from saying his score, idk I find that funny😅 Also wth?! the amount of time and effort this must have taken to organize and edit,respect.
He is one fine man 😩😍+ he’s hilarious,perfect lol
Dude you put so much effort into these! I'm so impressed
Everyone who complains about Link's scoring needs to watch this. Rhett is a garbage disposal with legs. Good job OP
the fact some of links highest (the brownies) were some of rhetts lowest😹
This is great lol well done
Rhett feels the need to provide a lot more justification for his scores
9:30
Great edit, and we thank you lol
“Now that I’ve had big girth and hot af…. 69” was too perfect 😂
Just because link uses more numbers doesn’t mean his answers are better, I feel like rhetts are better just because he has the same emotion every time he says the same number but like will be like 🤢62🤢 but to something else he’ll be like 😮😮🥰🥰😍62‼️💞💞💞
1:30 Hilarious 🤣😂
Took me until the high 30s to realise what you meant by “in order”. I identify with link
Link looks the same, Rhett looks different in each clip! Thanks!
gut check him get that moisture going lol new sub here.
This is amazing jeez
Okay kids today we will be learning our numbers with Rhett
AP Statistics coming into work at the end lol
Rhett arrived at 50 around 05:30... he likes food
I don't know why, but I keep replaying 8:00 of "NACHO?!"
Lmao “who gives a crap??” 17:47
Rhett is just a hungry boy!
And now a duo countdown in one video hehe 😄😛😜
can somebody tell me whet episode is the one where they switch chairs
There’s enough data in this video to save the universe
He reminds me of when I watched duck dynasty
Man just loves to eat
What a nice video
How could someone give Buffalo Wild Wings' Thai Curry sauce a 47? That's the best one there! 87!
5 minutes in and we’re already at 50
Update please
14:42
2 3 4 7 9 10 13 15 16 17 20 24 26 30 40 97 98 99 All the numbers he didnt use
Did anyone do the average?
Do you know what mean means
@@Painfoot Did you even speak English?
@@justink.howlett9152 sounds like someone must have flunked out of middle school statistics if you don’t know what mean, median, and mode are. Or do they not teach you that in America? Maybe not old enough to be in middle school?
@@justink.howlett9152 this is the most American thing I have ever read
Y’all I was joking.
4 4
some of links scores are pretentious and a little random but rhett was in his 70's a little more than halfway through, that makes most of his scores above 50, which either means he really likes the food (which now that im writing it down, it makes sense, rhett sure does love his food) or he's inaccurate with his scores, they mostly have to rely on link to give accurate scores so they all arent super high.
Or usually it's hard to find many awful products in the sale list of a famous brand?
@@LoScribacchino except they're trying to find the best product that the famous brand sells, so instead of giving something that doesnt taste that great a one and then giving the half decent ones a much better score, he should be giving more divergent scores like link.
something has to be actively below average to get below a 50 from rhett, because 50 is the average, most brands will be above 50
Me waiting for 69 like 👁👄👁