Thanks for your comment. Correct, stimulation of positrons (+e), which inherently have more energy than electrons (-e), proven by the invention of the Cloud Chamber, but they are one. Which, was proven by of Paul Dirac's mathematics back in the 1930's. This lead to Paul Dirac being awarded a Nobel Prize for his discovery of the positron (+e). This concept shattered Einstein's concepts of GR and SR. Which, lead to Einstein never receiving a Nobel Prize for his false theories. Strangely, the academic community, to this day i.e. 100 years later, accepts GR and SR as truth. Yet, it's fundamentally wrong... No wonder the academic elite haven't figured it out yet. "Truth is stranger than fiction." Again, thanks for your comment.
@@quantumkineticscorporation This is awesome, 🙏 using the VIC invention by Meyer to create a working quantum well using electrostatic fields, for example you place two parallel plates with **opposite polarities** to generate a potential difference. This setup creates a **potential well** between the plates where charged particles (like electrons) are confined. The confinement leads to **quantized energy levels** within the well due to quantum mechanical effects. By adjusting the **strength of the fields** and the **distance between the plates**, you can control the well’s depth and width. The confined particles behave similarly to those in semiconductor quantum wells, displaying phenomena like **energy quantization** and **quantum tunneling**. For optimal performance, a **vacuum** or low-pressure inert gas is used as the medium to minimize interference with the electric fields and particle interactions. Other mediums can be used due the VIC preventing dead short conditions like Water.
@@obr2021 Thanks for your comment. We agree with you regarding the quantum vacuum flux and the quantized energy levels (quantum tunneling). However, we have to clarify that the Quantum Kinetic Well® is not the VIC. It is something completely new and innovative from the prior art technology of the 1990's. Again, thank you for your wonderful comment. "Truth is stranger than fiction."
@@obr2021 Thanks for your amazing comment! Anything is possible with this technology. It is only limited to the imagination. So, when you look at it that way. We got it made.
According to CERN, "We don't find antimatter around us; in order to study antimatter it has to be made." where do you get your antimatter if it costs 1 billion for a gram?! The cost of antimatter from CERN's website: The efficiency of antimatter production and storage is very low. About 1 billion times more energy is required to make antimatter than is finally contained in its mass. Using E = mc2, we find that 1 gram of antimatter contains: 0.001 kg x (300,000,000 m/s)2 = 90,000 GJ = 25 million kWh Taking into account the low production efficiency, it would need 25 million billion kWh to make one single gram! Even at a discount price for electric power, this would cost more than a million billion Euros!
Thank you John Hill for your comment. It's great to see new users engaging on RUclips. We appreciate your clarity and honesty. We hope, too, you will upload new content to RUclips soon. As for your concerns about antimatter, we would agree with you. It takes an enormous amount of energy to "produce" 1 gram of antimatter. However, in our video on "Gravity" we never say, "We create or produce antimatter". We do however mention, that we "tickle" antimatter using a special type of electricity. It is called, "negative differential electron pressure". Positrons and electrons work together to stabilize and expand our known universe. Interestingly enough, in a Cloud-Chamber when the electron and positron polarize in a swirling action; it can be seen that the positron has more "kinetic" energy than the electron. Just food for thought regarding how the Universe functions... Antimatter can be "tickled" at 1.9 watts/sec using the Quantum Kinetic Well phenomenon. Limitless Clean Energy is here!
Thanks for your comment. Yes, teaching the forgotten realm of physics in the 1930-50's that was swept under the Einsteinian classical physics, which is only half correct... A bold new world is waiting for the human race. If they want it... Again, thanks for your comment.
@@quantumkineticscorporation it clearly says in the article "Now when the rubidium rushes out fast enough, if behaves as if it has negative mass" the key word is "behaves" not that it is negative mass. If that was your smoking gun, I'm sorry - but that's a massive failure.
@@aneikei Thank you for your comments. In our video on "Gravity", we never refer to antimatter as "(-)negative mass". We call it, "A conjugate charge-mass". We would agree with you that "(-)negative mass" is impossible using Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. However, it should be noted, that Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theories on G.R. or even Special Relativity. Perhaps, we here at QKC will make a future video covering this topic (field line charges, both positive and negative) more in detail. Again, thank you for your comments.
So all and all it’s the creation and manipulation of Electrostatic field between the exciter, lines of force that makes it possible.
Thanks for your comment.
Correct, stimulation of positrons (+e), which inherently have more energy than electrons (-e), proven by the invention of the Cloud Chamber, but they are one.
Which, was proven by of Paul Dirac's mathematics back in the 1930's. This lead to Paul Dirac being awarded a Nobel Prize for his discovery of the positron (+e). This concept shattered Einstein's concepts of GR and SR. Which, lead to Einstein never receiving a Nobel Prize for his false theories. Strangely, the academic community, to this day i.e. 100 years later, accepts GR and SR as truth. Yet, it's fundamentally wrong... No wonder the academic elite haven't figured it out yet.
"Truth is stranger than fiction."
Again, thanks for your comment.
@@quantumkineticscorporation This is awesome, 🙏 using the VIC invention by Meyer to create a working quantum well using electrostatic fields, for example you place two parallel plates with **opposite polarities** to generate a potential difference. This setup creates a **potential well** between the plates where charged particles (like electrons) are confined. The confinement leads to **quantized energy levels** within the well due to quantum mechanical effects. By adjusting the **strength of the fields** and the **distance between the plates**, you can control the well’s depth and width. The confined particles behave similarly to those in semiconductor quantum wells, displaying phenomena like **energy quantization** and **quantum tunneling**. For optimal performance, a **vacuum** or low-pressure inert gas is used as the medium to minimize interference with the electric fields and particle interactions. Other mediums can be used due the VIC preventing dead short conditions like Water.
@@obr2021 Thanks for your comment.
We agree with you regarding the quantum vacuum flux and the quantized energy levels (quantum tunneling). However, we have to clarify that the Quantum Kinetic Well® is not the VIC. It is something completely new and innovative from the prior art technology of the 1990's.
Again, thank you for your wonderful comment.
"Truth is stranger than fiction."
@@obr2021 Thanks for your amazing comment!
Anything is possible with this technology. It is only limited to the imagination. So, when you look at it that way. We got it made.
According to CERN, "We don't find antimatter around us; in order to study antimatter it has to be made." where do you get your antimatter if it costs 1 billion for a gram?!
The cost of antimatter from CERN's website:
The efficiency of antimatter production and storage is very low. About 1 billion times more energy is required to make antimatter than is finally contained in its mass. Using E = mc2, we find that 1 gram of antimatter contains:
0.001 kg x (300,000,000 m/s)2 = 90,000 GJ = 25 million kWh
Taking into account the low production efficiency, it would need 25 million billion kWh to make one single gram! Even at a discount price for electric power, this would cost more than a million billion Euros!
Thank you John Hill for your comment. It's great to see new users engaging on RUclips. We appreciate your clarity and honesty. We hope, too, you will upload new content to RUclips soon.
As for your concerns about antimatter, we would agree with you. It takes an enormous amount of energy to "produce" 1 gram of antimatter. However, in our video on "Gravity" we never say, "We create or produce antimatter". We do however mention, that we "tickle" antimatter using a special type of electricity. It is called, "negative differential electron pressure".
Positrons and electrons work together to stabilize and expand our known universe. Interestingly enough, in a Cloud-Chamber when the electron and positron polarize in a swirling action; it can be seen that the positron has more "kinetic" energy than the electron. Just food for thought regarding how the Universe functions...
Antimatter can be "tickled" at 1.9 watts/sec using the Quantum Kinetic Well phenomenon.
Limitless Clean Energy is here!
Курс физики для ПТУшников.
Thanks for your comment.
Yes, teaching the forgotten realm of physics in the 1930-50's that was swept under the Einsteinian classical physics, which is only half correct... A bold new world is waiting for the human race. If they want it...
Again, thanks for your comment.
You placing a negative in front of mass doesn't mean antimatter. It means negative mass, which does not exist.
phys.org/news/2017-04-physicists-negative-mass.html
@@quantumkineticscorporation it clearly says in the article "Now when the rubidium rushes out fast enough, if behaves as if it has negative mass" the key word is "behaves" not that it is negative mass. If that was your smoking gun, I'm sorry - but that's a massive failure.
@@aneikei Thank you for your comments. In our video on "Gravity", we never refer to antimatter as "(-)negative mass". We call it, "A conjugate charge-mass". We would agree with you that "(-)negative mass" is impossible using Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. However, it should be noted, that Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theories on G.R. or even Special Relativity. Perhaps, we here at QKC will make a future video covering this topic (field line charges, both positive and negative) more in detail.
Again, thank you for your comments.