The 2014 TOHO version looks sharper at first glance, but upon closer inspection, the 2011 Criterion version actually has the more detailed image in each frame.
Watched criterion first time ever seeing Godzilla and it was Very dark , didn't ruin the movie but I thought just a byproduct of the time /difficulty shooting effects shots etc @@bluemutt9964
@@stitch9677 I think if there had been more nighttime scenes with Godzilla, it might actually be perfect. The introduction to him at the very beginning was fucking peak.
OH SHIT I never noticed that, that is genuinely really shitty. That being said, I do prefer the criterion just a touch because the blacks aren't pure black, it gives that warm slightly flat film look, not to mention not increasing the contrast gives more depth to the image compared to the more intensely contrasty look of Toho's.
Its getting a 4k restoration from the original source, schedule for release in November by Criterion. It'll also have the American version with the same treatment and a standard bluray copy with it.
Nah, 1. the original camera negative of Godzilla doesn't exist anymore. Toho's 4K restoration is from various internegative duplicate sources. 2. Godzilla, the U.S. version popularly known as Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, will be the same 2K restoration undertaken in 2011.
Yes, some sections are a bit brighter in the new Toho edition, but since I already own a copy of Criterion's release, I'll just stay with it. It's the same movie, after all!
The 2014 TOHO version looks sharper at first glance, but upon closer inspection, the 2011 Criterion version actually has the more detailed image in each frame.
It's sharper at first glance and viewing, Criterion is too dark
Watched criterion first time ever seeing Godzilla and it was Very dark , didn't ruin the movie but I thought just a byproduct of the time /difficulty shooting effects shots etc @@bluemutt9964
65 Years Later and still the best Godzilla movie
69 years later and it’s no longer the best Godzilla movie.
@@XanthosAcanthus I still think its better, darker and more realistic but minus one was close
@@stitch9677 I think if there had been more nighttime scenes with Godzilla, it might actually be perfect. The introduction to him at the very beginning was fucking peak.
godzilla minus 1 is now the king
Nope@@silentslayergaming8469
0:08 They actually fixed it!
@@trentspiwak972 They fixed the stability of that one shot of the cannons.
Put the video in 0.25x speed
OH SHIT I never noticed that, that is genuinely really shitty. That being said, I do prefer the criterion just a touch because the blacks aren't pure black, it gives that warm slightly flat film look, not to mention not increasing the contrast gives more depth to the image compared to the more intensely contrasty look of Toho's.
I hope this restoration is in the 4k version.
Creo que la de Toho vale mas la pena, arreglaron el fotograma dañado y se ve un poco menos oscuro.
A esperar a Marzo a ver el reestreno en 4k
Is there even a difference or is it just darker in the 2011 one
Happy Halloween 🎃
Its getting a 4k restoration from the original source, schedule for release in November by Criterion.
It'll also have the American version with the same treatment and a standard bluray copy with it.
Nah, 1. the original camera negative of Godzilla doesn't exist anymore. Toho's 4K restoration is from various internegative duplicate sources.
2. Godzilla, the U.S. version popularly known as Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, will be the same 2K restoration undertaken in 2011.
@@SpaceHunterM
So, I shouldn't buy the criterion 4k?
Yes, some sections are a bit brighter in the new Toho edition, but since I already own a copy of Criterion's release, I'll just stay with it. It's the same movie, after all!
Toho restorations generally suck.