Yes, this unit will work with the Fluke 192. Setup is pretty simple. We can probably supply you with a datasheet if necessary. Call us if you have any questions.
I recently bought the pico scope with you guys , do you have any link or video to show set up for secondary ignition , I was working on 92 toyota pick up 3.0 and the clamp was not graving the wire because on this truck the ignition wires are very thin , I got the snap on scope and I got a good wave form , I know i am missing some thing here on my set up I was using the extenuater would appreciate your help.
I bought this probe and us3 it with my snap-on verus.The waveform i get is nothing like it should be!!My waveform,no matter how you lay it on the coil looks like two mountain peaks joined together,one larger than the other??
(Copied from above) Yes, this unit will work with the Fluke 192. Setup is pretty simple. We can probably supply you with a datasheet if necessary. Call us if you have any questions.
The number of wires to the coil itself is of little relevance. The big difference will occur in overall coil design and shielding. Some coils the probe responds better than others.
Why is it that these Chrysler 2 wire COPs have that weird looking burn line that slopes downward . I see this same pattern on many of the 3.6L pentastar engines even when running perfectly fine with no misfires and with different probes like the Pico probe and your Paddle probe and even with just a lead clipped to a copper penny I see the same pattern . just seems.weird
Jorge, just out of curiosity, was there anything wrong with the vehicle? It looked like to me the spark line was jumping high sometimes, was that because of scaling being switched? Just something I noticed.
You will see that on virtually any ignition pattern on any scope. Combustion by its very nature is not static, and you will see changes in the pattern due to subtle differences in each ignition event. The way the probe works, in a electrically noisy environment will cause "jumps" in the pattern.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Yes, this unit will work with the Fluke 192. Setup is pretty simple. We can probably supply you with a datasheet if necessary.
Call us if you have any questions.
How do you set up the paddle probe to your scope I don't have a 1000 to 1 only x1 x10 x1000 x10000
good lesson gorge,keep up the good work....
I recently bought the pico scope with you guys , do you have any link or video to show set up for secondary ignition , I was working on 92 toyota pick up 3.0 and the clamp was not graving the wire because on this truck the ignition wires are very thin , I got the snap on scope and I got a good wave form , I know i am missing some thing here on my set up I was using the extenuater would appreciate your help.
I bought this probe and us3 it with my snap-on verus.The waveform i get is nothing like it should be!!My waveform,no matter how you lay it on the coil looks like two mountain peaks joined together,one larger than the other??
Really enjoyed this vid, could use a microphone ;) I use the Pico Paddle, but this vid really helped me fine tune using it!
Very helpful!
Can it work with a fluke scopemeter 192 and how hard would it be to set up.
(Copied from above) Yes, this unit will work with the Fluke 192. Setup is pretty simple. We can probably supply you with a datasheet if necessary.
Call us if you have any questions.
could i use that paddle on a snapon modis ultra
Absolutely, with the correct adapter to plug into your MODIS Ultra.
Hey Jorge will this work on 2,3 and 4 wire coils?
The number of wires to the coil itself is of little relevance. The big difference will occur in overall coil design and shielding. Some coils the probe responds better than others.
Why is it that these Chrysler 2 wire COPs have that weird looking burn line that slopes downward . I see this same pattern on many of the 3.6L pentastar engines even when running perfectly fine with no misfires and with different probes like the Pico probe and your Paddle probe and even with just a lead clipped to a copper penny I see the same pattern . just seems.weird
Jorge, just out of curiosity, was there anything wrong with the vehicle? It looked like to me the spark line was jumping high sometimes, was that because of scaling being switched? Just something I noticed.
You will see that on virtually any ignition pattern on any scope. Combustion by its very nature is not static, and you will see changes in the pattern due to subtle differences in each ignition event. The way the probe works, in a electrically noisy environment will cause "jumps" in the pattern.
busjockey1 yeah,look like spark having a hard time reaching the plug
Yes
In one of your other videos, Mario says to put the copper side of the probe facing up!
Actually, when testing, you may have to reposition and flip-flip the probe to get the "best" waveform possible.
Good Presentation
Piece of crap not worth the money.