The most intuitive video on imaginary numbers I have ever seen on the internet. Your videos are just brilliant. Thanks and please keep up the good work.
Amazing. I'm so glad I was able to help you. Please share the video with anyone you feel it could help. If you're working with image processing, are you using 2D Fourier Transforms?
Thank you. More videos on the way. The next video on how to interpret the output of an FFT is currently in production and I hope to release it at the beginning of May. Please add ideas for videos you would like to see in the comments so I can add it to my list.
AMAZING. I had such trouble understanding the concept of imaginary numbers back in my days as a student. It was only after working with them in my professional life for several years that the penny finally dropped. This video details my path to understanding.
I love your videos! I haven't learned any maths higher than integral calculus and I understand everything you discuss very well. I wish more people explained the basics as simply as you do; it makes understanding the more advanced things so easy. I feel like your videos are a series of stepping-stones that explain everything gradually. Wonderful channel!
Really this video is very helpful to understand Fourier Transform. Thank u so much sir. If you make a video about Laplace Transform, we will be able to understand it clearly.
Thank you. Glad it was helpful. Laplace is definitely on my radar, but I need to get the the same level as my understanding of Fourier before I can release a video about it. The research continues.
I just discover your channel thanks to RUclips algorithm (since I like this kind of subjects...) , I have to say that your videos are truly awesome, the way you help with the visual representation is incredible, it can explain complex thing is such an intuitive way ...Bravo
Thanks for pointing this out. You are, of course, correct. I must change this in my scripts for the Udemy course I am building on the Fourier Transform. Thanks.
Wonderful videos with great explanations. Could you please explain why do the real and imaginary results are the amplitudes of the cos and sine that together give the sinusoid with the maximum score for the given frequency?
Thank you so much for such great explanation of Fourier transformation, that I have never seen a second person explain the algorithm in this way. I started to learn some theory of x-ray crystallography 8 years ago, but never got the idea of the benefit of complexed sinosoid, and why the equation is true. I almost get the idea of how the aim is achieved with sinosoid with a certain phase that produce the maximum value when convolved with the signal, which represent the maximum contribution of the sinosoid with that frequency. However, I want to know why the statement at 14:33 is true, that the sine and cos wave with different amplitude, the same frequency and 0 phase difference, when each convolved with the signal, can produce a sinosoid with a certain phase, at which the maximum of the contribution of the sinosoid to the signal occur? Could you explain this part? 😅👍
@Jiang Xu you understood him wrong, first you get the sinusiod with the amplitude and phase by combining pure cosine and pure sine, and then with the resulting sinsuoid with phase shift you convolute with the original signal
Hi, thanks for your explanation. I think my expression was not correct. I just want to know why this short cut is true that when using complexed sinosoid calculation shown starting from 14:33 , you dont' have to slide the sinosoid wave with a arbitary frequency against the signal wave to integrate and to get the maxima contribution from that arbitary sinosoid wave. I think this part was not mentioned in the video, Mark just used this method but didn't explain why it is true@@vex18th
Nice explanation about the concept of i (rotation). May I ask, why only e to the i theta is spiral. What would be any number to the i theta looks like. In natural logarithm why we use the number e as base why it can't be pi i.e., log to the base pi . What is meaning of pi to the i theta
Interesting question. The special thing about Euler's number is it's relationship to sine and cosine as shown by Euler's formula which no other number shares. See my video on Euler's identity for more info: ruclips.net/video/sKtloBAuP74/видео.html
hi, great lectures, 14:32 shouldn't the real and imaginary parts of fourier transforms be divided by T/2 to get the amplitudes ?? my logic stems from the fact that Fourier Series is a special case (special form) of Fourier Transform , correct me if i am wrong greetings !!!
I did not get the idea of shifting the sinusoidal by adding a sine and cosine with varying amplitudes. From where that concept came from ? That idea is not present in the actual Fourier Transform Equation.
It is implied in the equation by the fact that the result is a list of complex numbers. Each complex number in the list represents a sinusoid with a different frequency. The complex number, which consists of a real and imaginary part represents the magnitude of a cosine wave (the real part) and a sine wave (the imaginary part). Try adding together a sine wave and a cosine wave with the same frequency but different magnitudes in excel or MATLAB or some other software that allows you to do these sorts of operations. Look what happens to the phase of the resultant wave.
How do you prove that the earth is moving at a speed of 12 times the speed of light. The reason why light is a trapped one. 3 square plus three. 3 square for mass. Light in three directions. Light is a three d vector.
U Shape Wave Thanks for your informative and well produced video. You and your viewers might find my quantum-like analog interesting and or useful. I have been trying to describe the “U” shape wave that is produced in my amateur science mechanical model in the video linked below. I hear if you over-lap wave together using Fournier Transforms, it may make a “U” shape or square wave. Can this be correct representation Feynman Path Integrals? In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level. Your viewers might be interested in seeing the load verse deflection graph in white paper found elsewhere on my RUclips channel. Actually replicating it with a sheet of clear folder plastic and tape and seeing it first hand is worth the effort. ruclips.net/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/видео.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3
Never heard a video emphasizing the fascinating world of signals and systems. Love to see some passion in educational EE videos. Thank you for sharing!
In light of your comment, I've added a link to the playlist. However, there is already a link to the video I refer to in the description (as I mentioned in the video) and there is a card, timed with my mention, that links to the video which should appear in the top right hand corner.
Please support the making of these videos: www.patreon.com/MarkNewman
Mark: How does one make a one-time support donation?
Thank you. That's very kind of you. Here's the link for a one time donation:
paypal.me/MarkHNewmam
Finally I'm relieved from a great burden of not understanding yet compelled to use the imagery numbers ..thanks a lot ..
This video is absolutely amazing.
Really glad you liked it. I wanted to explain it in the way I wish it had been explained to me all those years ago.
The most mind blowing intuitive explanation of any idea that I have come across on Internet yet. I 'm holding to this forever.
This man is brilliant and needs his own TV show!!
The most intuitive video on imaginary numbers I have ever seen on the internet. Your videos are just brilliant. Thanks and please keep up the good work.
I did not expect to get this much feeling from a fourier transform explanation video.
Thank you sir. This video is by far the best explanation of i that I have encountered on the Internet yet. Congratulations.
Wow, thanks!
I have to say I love the blues clues aesthetic of your videos. Being new to systems and signals and taking a class for it, this is a lifesaver.
Blue clues aesthetic? (U speaking of the background?)
I m working on image processing in Fourier domaine, and finally i did understand why the formula of FT is like this . Thank you so much !!!
Amazing. I'm so glad I was able to help you. Please share the video with anyone you feel it could help. If you're working with image processing, are you using 2D Fourier Transforms?
Please make more such videos. . It's extremely useful
Thank you. More videos on the way. The next video on how to interpret the output of an FFT is currently in production and I hope to release it at the beginning of May. Please add ideas for videos you would like to see in the comments so I can add it to my list.
The BEST channel explaining Signals and Systems.
Wonderful explanation of a difficult concept that tantalised me until I stumbled upon these videos. Well done
You have done a good work that is going to be remembered by students around the world
If the material I am trying to teach is remembered and understood by students, then there can be no greater compliment to a teacher than that.
We need more of this ...
This is the worlds best explantion ever I heard. Thank you so much
Thanks Mark, well done. I think you will do well with this format.
I cannot thank you more... this video is the only video i can understand
AMAZING. I had such trouble understanding the concept of imaginary numbers back in my days as a student. It was only after working with them in my professional life for several years that the penny finally dropped. This video details my path to understanding.
I have to watch all your videos.
Thanks for presenting these topics so well that my old brain can follow.
Very good interpreation. Many thanks for your help
I love your videos! I haven't learned any maths higher than integral calculus and I understand everything you discuss very well. I wish more people explained the basics as simply as you do; it makes understanding the more advanced things so easy. I feel like your videos are a series of stepping-stones that explain everything gradually. Wonderful channel!
Wow...this was an unexpected fantastic explanation!
best video i've seen on the Fourier transform. makes the subject very accessible:)
Thank you sir ,its really amazing .finally I got what I was looking for ...lots of love from India
Pure gold mine for me!
Eres un profesor realmente impresionante
You are a very awesome teacher !
Love you man! Thanks a lot for the efforts you took ❤ simply the best videos out there on Fourier transform. Even better than 3b1b !
Thank you Sir 😇
I am from India 🇮🇳
This video is really amazing, nice explanation
these are so good and you've made it really interesting
Excelente explicación, muchas gracias.
Thank you very much! Eureka! I got it. Really Amazing! Mark， I love you.
AMAZING!! I love giving people Eureka moments.
Thank you. Your clip is amazing. Keep up your work!
Superb explaination 👍🏻
Thank you.
Legend
Thank you
I didnt know unhinged maths was what I needed. But it is
Thank you!
i’m only a minute in and i’m blown away, thank you!
Really this video is very helpful to understand Fourier Transform. Thank u so much sir. If you make a video about Laplace Transform, we will be able to understand it clearly.
Thank you. Glad it was helpful. Laplace is definitely on my radar, but I need to get the the same level as my understanding of Fourier before I can release a video about it. The research continues.
Pulley or leakage. Leakage of dimensions which are otherwise orthogonal. Water pipe with hole for leakage which can let water both direction.
I just discover your channel thanks to RUclips algorithm (since I like this kind of subjects...) , I have to say that your videos are truly awesome, the way you help with the visual representation is incredible, it can explain complex thing is such an intuitive way ...Bravo
Amazing video! Cheers from Argentina :)
You're welcome. Please share with anyone you think it could help.
you are the best
0:17 A spiral has a continuously narrowing or widening radius. What you have there is a helix.
Thanks for pointing this out. You are, of course, correct. I must change this in my scripts for the Udemy course I am building on the Fourier Transform. Thanks.
Very well done 👍 17:26
BEST DESCRIPTION OF I EVER
OUTSTANDING!!
2 variables in an exponent is wild
so excellent, so beautiful
with regards
Perfect. Thanks a lot
Wonderful videos with great explanations. Could you please explain why do the real and imaginary results are the amplitudes of the cos and sine that together give the sinusoid with the maximum score for the given frequency?
Awesome. Thanks.
Thank you!!!
Great stuff! 😊
beautiful
super...thank you so much...
thanks
Thank you so much for such great explanation of Fourier transformation, that I have never seen a second person explain the algorithm in this way. I started to learn some theory of x-ray crystallography 8 years ago, but never got the idea of the benefit of complexed sinosoid, and why the equation is true. I almost get the idea of how the aim is achieved with sinosoid with a certain phase that produce the maximum value when convolved with the signal, which represent the maximum contribution of the sinosoid with that frequency. However, I want to know why the statement at 14:33 is true, that the sine and cos wave with different amplitude, the same frequency and 0 phase difference, when each convolved with the signal, can produce a sinosoid with a certain phase, at which the maximum of the contribution of the sinosoid to the signal occur? Could you explain this part? 😅👍
@Jiang Xu you understood him wrong, first you get the sinusiod with the amplitude and phase by combining pure cosine and pure sine, and then with the resulting sinsuoid with phase shift you convolute with the original signal
Hi, thanks for your explanation. I think my expression was not correct. I just want to know why this short cut is true that when using complexed sinosoid calculation shown starting from 14:33 , you dont' have to slide the sinosoid wave with a arbitary frequency against the signal wave to integrate and to get the maxima contribution from that arbitary sinosoid wave. I think this part was not mentioned in the video, Mark just used this method but didn't explain why it is true@@vex18th
I came for the math, the kipa was the cherry on top.
Nice sir 👍
amazing
16:13 explains
why e to the power minus i is used in fourier transform formula .
@Paulancar unnecessary 😒answer
Great video
Glad you enjoyed it
beautiful, even my little brother understood it.
Wow. Thank you. How old is your little brother?
@@MarkNewmanEducation 14 🙂
Nice explanation about the concept of i (rotation).
May I ask, why only e to the i theta is spiral. What would be any number to the i theta looks like.
In natural logarithm why we use the number e as base why it can't be pi i.e., log to the base pi .
What is meaning of pi to the i theta
Interesting question. The special thing about Euler's number is it's relationship to sine and cosine as shown by Euler's formula which no other number shares. See my video on Euler's identity for more info: ruclips.net/video/sKtloBAuP74/видео.html
I can finally see signals from Mathematic equations
Amazing! In that case I achieved what I set out to do when I scripted the video. Thanks for the feedback.
hi, great lectures,
14:32 shouldn't the real and imaginary parts of fourier transforms be divided by T/2 to get the amplitudes ??
my logic stems from the fact that Fourier Series is a special case (special form) of Fourier Transform , correct me if i am wrong
greetings !!!
Nice!
Thank you
I did not get the idea of shifting the sinusoidal by adding a sine and cosine with varying amplitudes. From where that concept came from ? That idea is not present in the actual Fourier Transform Equation.
It is implied in the equation by the fact that the result is a list of complex numbers. Each complex number in the list represents a sinusoid with a different frequency. The complex number, which consists of a real and imaginary part represents the magnitude of a cosine wave (the real part) and a sine wave (the imaginary part). Try adding together a sine wave and a cosine wave with the same frequency but different magnitudes in excel or MATLAB or some other software that allows you to do these sorts of operations. Look what happens to the phase of the resultant wave.
The imaginary number is Not imaginary. It is Unimaginable, or inimaginable. It preserves the symbolic i. Ouf ! 😉
Tanks!
Sir why you can't your idea patented?
What idea? The maths isn't mine. It's hundreds of years old. I'm just trying to explain it in a more intuitive way.
@@MarkNewmanEducation sir you explation is excellent.
How do you prove that the earth is moving at a speed of 12 times the speed of light. The reason why light is a trapped one. 3 square plus three. 3 square for mass. Light in three directions. Light is a three d vector.
U Shape Wave
Thanks for your informative and well produced video.
You and your viewers might find my quantum-like analog interesting and or useful.
I have been trying to describe the “U” shape wave that is produced in my amateur science mechanical model in the video linked below.
I hear if you over-lap wave together using Fournier Transforms, it may make a “U” shape or square wave. Can this be correct representation Feynman Path Integrals?
In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level.
Your viewers might be interested in seeing the load verse deflection graph in white paper found elsewhere on my RUclips channel.
Actually replicating it with a sheet of clear folder plastic and tape and seeing it first hand is worth the effort.
ruclips.net/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/видео.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3
??????????
Great work ! Keep on going, you shape the world with such outstanding presentation of normally high complex processes
Never heard a video emphasizing the fascinating world of signals and systems. Love to see some passion in educational EE videos. Thank you for sharing!
A visual interpretation of Euler's equation - mind blown.
老外对问题的执着,及疑问的态度的确值得我国的老师学习😃😃
this is on my top 5 list of the greatest math-videos on youtube.
"In my last video" is a meaningless term until you number or date your videos and point us to the relevant menu.
In light of your comment, I've added a link to the playlist. However, there is already a link to the video I refer to in the description (as I mentioned in the video) and there is a card, timed with my mention, that links to the video which should appear in the top right hand corner.
I'm wondering if the same can be said about division by 0. Could it be that division by 0, tan(90) and multiplying by +/-i are related?