Finite square well bound states

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 52

  • @leetingfung
    @leetingfung 7 лет назад +50

    video less than 30min still way better than lectures in whole semester

    • @changbadinesh
      @changbadinesh 4 года назад

      I need exact analytical solution to the energies ..can YOu do it for me?

  • @annakiseleva7418
    @annakiseleva7418 5 лет назад +7

    THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU'RE LITERALLY SAVING MY INTEREST IN QUANTUM HERE

  • @himangshuchakraborty1760
    @himangshuchakraborty1760 3 года назад +2

    Thank you so much.. On 31st may'2021 I've presentation on "Finite square well potential". Nd I found this☺

  • @sharairamirez9274
    @sharairamirez9274 4 года назад +4

    hi, great video c: I was wondering, what happens if the potential is odd?

  • @BLVGamingY
    @BLVGamingY 9 месяцев назад

    at around 6:00 you assume the function only contains sines and cosines instead of letting it be complex exponentials, it ends up the same because once you assume those complex exponentials form an even function, then you arrive at sine anyways

  • @vivekpanchal3338
    @vivekpanchal3338 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks for explainning Better than everyone.
    👌

  • @emillytabara9410
    @emillytabara9410 4 года назад +1

    Hi! great explanation . Which software do you use to write?

  • @monicapym8948
    @monicapym8948 3 года назад

    This is exactly what I was looking for, amazing!!

  • @aniruddhavichare5425
    @aniruddhavichare5425 8 лет назад +4

    best explanation

  • @user-rg1nt9lf4s
    @user-rg1nt9lf4s 6 лет назад

    very good content sir. thank you .. sir kindly make a video on Bound
    States for Potential Wells with no rigid walls.

  • @c4esium137
    @c4esium137 Месяц назад

    21:52 n should only take odd integer values no?

  • @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666
    @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666 4 года назад +2

    Shouldnt it be the second derivative of psi for when you wrote the time independant schrodinger equation?

  • @davidhand9721
    @davidhand9721 4 года назад

    Do you have a course on QFT, too? Can anyone recommend one that is as clear and good as this?

  • @gyalofabundance
    @gyalofabundance 7 лет назад +1

    Thanks for the explanation!
    Where did you graph the functions?

    • @the-fantabulous-g
      @the-fantabulous-g 4 года назад

      Program's called SAGE, you should be able to find it by searching sage graphing or something similar

  • @pranavgeorge992
    @pranavgeorge992 4 года назад +1

    In the 2nd region E>V, does this mean the particle is free in that region?

    • @account1307
      @account1307 4 года назад +3

      No a particle is only free if its energy is greater than the potential everywhere, in the second region the energy of the particle is greater than V but it is still less than the maximum value of the potential globally :)

    • @BLVGamingY
      @BLVGamingY 9 месяцев назад

      ​@account1307 bruh he meant in the region and, in the region, the answer is yes, but since the region is finite there are some limitations

  • @eliaskaroui5665
    @eliaskaroui5665 4 года назад +2

    please help
    why E is greater then the potential V in Region 2 ?2:35
    why is V greter then E in Region 1 and 3 ?

    • @puikihung5882
      @puikihung5882 4 года назад +3

      see the graph at 1:57. E(x) is always in between o and -V0. Hence E(x) is a negative number. In region 1 and 3, by definition, V(x) is 0, so EV.

  • @SampleroftheMultiverse
    @SampleroftheMultiverse 10 лет назад +1

    Your video is well done!

  • @onlineearning8323
    @onlineearning8323 4 года назад

    I need a pdf solution of chapter 11 problems. quantum scattering.. can I get it from you?

  • @kemalaziz9696
    @kemalaziz9696 5 лет назад +4

    Look at the bottom of 3:26, there is an error.

    • @NiflheimMists
      @NiflheimMists 4 года назад +2

      Yeah, leftmost term should have d2ψ/dx2 instead of just ψ

  • @Domenzain31
    @Domenzain31 2 года назад

    The S.E. is missing the second derivative with respect to x in minute 3:00

  • @ashwith
    @ashwith 10 лет назад

    Would be incorrect to not use the fact that \Psi can be odd or even and do the problem the hard way?

  • @niamphmotley
    @niamphmotley 2 года назад

    where does the 4 come from ?

  • @kokori100
    @kokori100 10 лет назад +2

    SOS!I have a question @ 04:30 . for x

    • @kartikaloria8256
      @kartikaloria8256 6 лет назад +1

      |E|

    • @rubenlauwaert6673
      @rubenlauwaert6673 5 лет назад

      I think it is just an assumption that (E

    • @puikihung5882
      @puikihung5882 4 года назад

      see the graph at 1:57. E(x) is always in between o and -V0. Hence E(x) is a negative number. In region 1 and 3, by definition, V(x) is 0, so EV.

  • @JohnDavid-iq9rz
    @JohnDavid-iq9rz 6 лет назад

    If E = Potential Energy(V) + Kinetic Energy(K), then, how E could be lesser than V ? For E< V, K will have to be negative, which is impossible. Please comment.

    • @NiflheimMists
      @NiflheimMists 4 года назад

      E cannot be less than V. But it can be negative, if V is.
      V < 0
      E < 0
      V < E < 0 is an allowed energy

    • @frede1905
      @frede1905 4 года назад +1

      @@NiflheimMists Yes, E CAN be less than V(x) for several points (so for several values of x). It's just that E can't be less than V(x) for ALL points (so for all values of x), because then the wave function can't be normalized (it will either be 0 everywhere, or it will blow up at x=-inf. and/or x=inf.).

  • @xichen9674
    @xichen9674 8 лет назад +1

    Why is E negative? Is it always negative?

    • @monku1521
      @monku1521 6 лет назад +2

      The outside of the well is 0 joules. It's when the potential is zero. Since we can't escape the potential (bound states), the Energy is less than zero.

  • @aniruddhavichare5425
    @aniruddhavichare5425 8 лет назад

    E is negative because its the binding energy

  • @arupmarik
    @arupmarik 5 лет назад

    What about last slide (no9)

  • @shivanandashekhar6580
    @shivanandashekhar6580 9 лет назад

    Easily understood

  • @Chemidan92
    @Chemidan92 10 лет назад

    At 9:30 "if we want to have an even function for psi we cannot have a sin term". Can someone explain please

    • @LimosRock1
      @LimosRock1 10 лет назад

      sin(x) is an odd function so even if you had any even terms, the function for psi will always be odd if there's a sin

  • @YourAverageHater
    @YourAverageHater 9 лет назад

    What happens if the potential is positive? Solution without imaginary roots?

    • @zeenaligog
      @zeenaligog 8 лет назад

      +Дејан Гујић yes if the V is +, inside the well ,the solutions are exponential without imaginary

  • @beedeelovesyouall
    @beedeelovesyouall 3 года назад

    Thank you so muccchhhhhh. Ur GODDDDDDDD

  • @Paradox586
    @Paradox586 4 года назад

    Why only even solution boundary conditions? I don’t get why sine is not considered for even solutions

    • @NiflheimMists
      @NiflheimMists 4 года назад

      Sine is an odd function, because it is antisymmetric about the origin. Cosine is an even function because it is symmetric about the origin.
      Both symmetric (even) and antisymmetric (odd) wavefunctions are both, in general, solutions for symmetric potentials, because the magnitude squared of either a symmetric or antisymmetric function is symmetric.

    • @HankGussman
      @HankGussman 4 года назад

      Just plot a graph of sin function from -pi/2 to +pi/2.
      You will see sin function is not symmetric about vertical axis.

  • @rukwoo4418
    @rukwoo4418 5 лет назад

    What about cos( la)=0?

  • @dlmoney11
    @dlmoney11 6 лет назад

    cos()/sin() = cot()