2:40 Weeping wing anti-ice sytems do not effectively shed already accumulated ice. They are preventive systems which require activation prior to entering icing conditions.
Hi ivy mciver and friend. Hope you are well and enjoying the cirrus sr22t aircraft what a life for our ivy. Philip is still interested in learning may be one day I will get to learn. Take care nice to see you. Keep enjoying the cirrus and the vision jet phil.
Good walkthrough, but deploying the chute is certainly not "much better than trying to find a field and do an approach into it". Can't believe the demonstrator agreed. 12:35
Correct. It's always better to land in a field, make it to a nearby airport, etc. if there is a viable option. The chute should be used as a last resort.
People hating on the chute makes me cringe. I did my commercial ride in my SR22 and did 200+ engine out landings. I can put her down right where I want her altitude permitting. Are fighter pilots crappy airmen for having a hot seat? A way out in a terrible oh shit moment? When I’m flying a xc in the SR22 over mountainous terrain or god forbid moonless xc at night nowhere near a town.. you bet your ass I love knowing if my one engine decides to fail, I’m more than happy with that shiny red handle above my right shoulder. It beats smashing into trees at 70 mph with 70+ gallons of 100LL in the wings waiting to incinerate me.
Now why did I know they'd be stressing the pulling of the chute from the get go. No trouble shooting.. No attempt to land somewhere.. Just pull the chute. There are quite a few parameters for successful deployment and even if successful, the plane is totalled. Insurance must be high because they know the owner will pull the chute as soon as there's an engine hiccup.
"forced" meaning what? Is that a power off 180? Or an off-field landing? I sat through a Cirrus session and there is a lot of misinformation out there from other vendors. They like to claim that "real pilots" don't need a chute. Cirrus does not advocate using the chute to land. It's a last-ditch option, but they want you to make good ADM decisions that say err on the side of living the next day. But if you can safely put her down in a field, that's the better choice. Same as a Bonanza. I asked a professed "real pilot" (Cirrus hater) how he would handle an IMC/night engine out over mountain or dangerous terrain. After all the stammering and refusals to answer, I surmised "death." Nobody want to pop the chute and lose a plane. It's expensive. But I think it's nice to have. I don't get why Cirrus is the only GA plane that calls for people to declare themselves "real pilots" to hate. Why does it matter to you that some other person popped it too soon? Does it hurt their soul?
You should have shown the switches and aircraft interior while the person explains where they are, rather than showing her face the entire time. We are all here to look at the aircraft, not the demonstrator. That’s basic common sense.
2:40 Weeping wing anti-ice sytems do not effectively shed already accumulated ice. They are preventive systems which require activation prior to entering icing conditions.
SR22T is a beautiful-looking plane. If it had retractable landing gears, it would be a perfect-looking plane. But in general, it is a great plane!!
I know a doctor who bought a Cirrus and pulled the chute when the AC stopped working.
That's an emergency.
Nice perspective. I've seen a lot of SR22 videos, but this had a lot of info that I wasn't aware of. Well done!
Hi ivy mciver and friend. Hope you are well and enjoying the cirrus sr22t aircraft what a life for our ivy. Philip is still interested in learning may be one day I will get to learn. Take care nice to see you. Keep enjoying the cirrus and the vision jet phil.
This video would’ve been perfect for a drinking game. Everyone take a shot of liquor each time Ivy said, “Uuum”.
i'm drinking right now... thanks for the idea
Definitely the standard that all manufacturers should aim for.
Rachel is amazing! 👏🏼
Ivy McIver - the best name I'm heard since Michael McMichael and Larrie McLaren
Great demo!
Cirrus has a side-yoke, Columbia has a side-stick. It’s a very comfortable plane.
Good walkthrough, but deploying the chute is certainly not "much better than trying to find a field and do an approach into it". Can't believe the demonstrator agreed. 12:35
Depends what you mean by field, but the stats definitely favour a pull in case of engine failure assuming sufficient altitude
Correct. It's always better to land in a field, make it to a nearby airport, etc. if there is a viable option. The chute should be used as a last resort.
Parachute is no alternative for good airmanship.
People hating on the chute makes me cringe. I did my commercial ride in my SR22 and did 200+ engine out landings. I can put her down right where I want her altitude permitting. Are fighter pilots crappy airmen for having a hot seat? A way out in a terrible oh shit moment? When I’m flying a xc in the SR22 over mountainous terrain or god forbid moonless xc at night nowhere near a town.. you bet your ass I love knowing if my one engine decides to fail, I’m more than happy with that shiny red handle above my right shoulder. It beats smashing into trees at 70 mph with 70+ gallons of 100LL in the wings waiting to incinerate me.
What is the max knots the parachute can take before it tears away from the plane in an engine failure or empty gas situation?
133 knots.
Now why did I know they'd be stressing the pulling of the chute from the get go. No trouble shooting.. No attempt to land somewhere.. Just pull the chute. There are quite a few parameters for successful deployment and even if successful, the plane is totalled. Insurance must be high because they know the owner will pull the chute as soon as there's an engine hiccup.
Good video
Lol...Great video of mostly two people looking at stuff. Next time, less face time and more of the equipment!
How do you teach forced landings in a cirrus? Is it go/no go decision to pick a field/roadway or is it automatically pull caps regardless?
"forced" meaning what? Is that a power off 180? Or an off-field landing?
I sat through a Cirrus session and there is a lot of misinformation out there from other vendors. They like to claim that "real pilots" don't need a chute. Cirrus does not advocate using the chute to land. It's a last-ditch option, but they want you to make good ADM decisions that say err on the side of living the next day. But if you can safely put her down in a field, that's the better choice. Same as a Bonanza.
I asked a professed "real pilot" (Cirrus hater) how he would handle an IMC/night engine out over mountain or dangerous terrain. After all the stammering and refusals to answer, I surmised "death."
Nobody want to pop the chute and lose a plane. It's expensive. But I think it's nice to have.
I don't get why Cirrus is the only GA plane that calls for people to declare themselves "real pilots" to hate. Why does it matter to you that some other person popped it too soon? Does it hurt their soul?
A marvel of engineering.....
You should have shown the switches and aircraft interior while the person explains where they are, rather than showing her face the entire time. We are all here to look at the aircraft, not the demonstrator. That’s basic common sense.
Nice bird!
Would have been an improvement to see more of the display's while she is demonstrating the glass panels, rather than looking at her talking.
That lady is nice.. 🤔 they both are
Can't you also parachute into mountains
Why are we looking at your faces?
hot