The Right and Left in India - Dr. David Frawley - India Inspires Talks
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- In this Talk, Dr. Frawley clearly explains the intellectual roots of "The Right" and "The Left" in India. He states that in India, the political terminology of right and left is defined by Marxists, who like to call anyone that opposes them right-wing or fascists. According to their view anything traditionally Hindu would have to be right-wing on principle, just as only their views are deemed progressive, even if supporting Stalinist tactics. This means that in India such subjects as Yoga, natural healing, vegetarianism and animal rights are all automatically right-wing because they are causes of the Hindu mind, with antecedents in ancient Indian culture. Great Hindu yogis and sages from Shankaracharya to Sri Aurobindo are classified by modern Marxists as right-wing, if not fascist.
However, the Indian left is mainly the Old Left, emphasizing a failed communist ideology and state economic planning such as dominated Eastern Europe in the decades following World War II and took it nowhere. It wreaked the same havoc with the economy and educational systems of India and kept the country backward. Indian communists are among the few in the world that still proudly honor Stalin and Mao (while warning of the danger of Hindu fundamentalism)!
About Speaker : - Dr. David Frawley (Pandit Vamadeva Shastri) D. Litt., is a western born teacher or guru in the Vedic tradition. In India, Vamadeva is recognized as a Vedacharya (Vedic teacher), and includes in his unusual wide scope of studies Ayurveda, Yoga, Vedanta and Vedic astrology, as well as the ancient Vedic teachings going back to the oldest Rigveda.
Vamadeva is a recipient of the prestigious Padma Bhushan award, one of the highest civilian awards granted by the government of India, “for distinguished service of a higher order to the nation,” honoring his work and writings as a Vedic teacher, which he received in March 2015.
To view more Talks - please visit www.indiainspires.org.
I'm an American vaidika...my long search carried me home and I'm content. Dear Hindus, please rediscover the true roots of Hinduism. Uphold, appreciate and value your wonderful tradition and culture. The world needs it!
@@abhilashduttaroy 🤦 Gatar
Noo India already westernised
No use now
Now west should certify then only Indians understand
@@abhilashduttaroy teri?
Ur Right, Hinduism / Sanathana Dharma is only answer for World Social Perils.
@@saideepreddy8480 Agree with you. Cannot give up on centuries old civilization can we ? Or should we ? As per opinion turning back would be doing so to all the efforts by our ancestors to preserve the glorious tradition.
That's it . I am reading the Vedas.. I have done a lot of research and now I am going to bring back my culture whIchever country I live or settle.. I love architecure of Indian values , the cultural values and I am proud of it .
This is the best time to do that. People have forgotten that amid all the propaganda you have to find truth because only truth will set you free.
Your culture of ancient Vedic knowledge, science, math and Sanskrit among others is being stolen bro..work hard and build yourself into a Virat Hindu who can fight such heinous measures taken by the west to steal our culture and history.
@@tiffles3890 I have read kautilyas Arthashashtra..it's interesting.
It is very difficult to read and understand vedas, even before that you need to find an authentic guru which is very very difficult to find in today's age. And even after you've done all this just understanding the vedas will take you years. And then there is a lot more to do after reading the vedas. It is not easy.
@@tiffles3890 Bhagwat Gita is essential but need a Guru to explain.
The amount of damage done to India and Hindus by the Congress, the Nehru family (the worst of them being Nehru and Sonia Gandhi) and the leftists is mind boggling. There is something seriously wrong with the country if the people can't see the consequences and still support these groups. Congratulations to Dr. Frawley in explaining all of this in such a lucid way.
@ Erwin Masasu, could you please elaborate and enlighten me on the damage done to India and Hindus by Nehru and Sonia?
@Z Z How? Other than rhetoric do you have any points?
Thank you Dr. Frawley, for this clear articulation. Thank you, India Inspires.
Brilliant talk. To the psuedo-seculars this appeals more when coming from a westerner. Although I think you are more Indian than many of us.
Bhagat Singh was a communist and atheist, just saying
@@reubenpapang5803 a patriot not a communist
@@reubenpapang5803
he wasn't a communist like today's one...
and above all he was a hardcore nationalist and there's nothing wrong in being an atheist.. millions of hindus are atheists.
@@sameerjha6562 obviously, he was more radical than today's. British called him a terrorist for God's sake. You're more similar to the British than Bhagat Singh
@@reubenpapang5803 he wasn't a communist , you dumbass .
Clarity and conviction are the two forces that make this great talk admirable. His conclusion about reforming the political practices world over through Dharmic and Karmic practices of the politicians world over, particularly in India, is the last nail on the coffin of Communism, a blunder that mankind was unforgivably driven into by the ideologues, during the three quarters of the twentieth century. One must be grateful for the academic spirit of free thinking of the learned speaker that is sadly lacking in the academia of today’s India.
This is what i wanted!
The most accurate lecture on Left and Right wings. Thank you India inspires,thank you Sir Frawley
robin singh a
India Inspires is doing a brilliant job!
This is a Must Watch for every Indian. Frawley lays bare the pitiable fact about Indian Leftists 'who are now returning their awards to this Government thats pro-Indian culture'. About these Indian Liberals and Leftists he observes 'they know more about Marx and ideas of Neo Marxism but none or almost all of them know no Sanskrit. Kalidasa, never learnt Vivekanada or Sri Aurobindo'.
Thank you for putting the Dharmic perspective & making us realise what we have lost & are losing in relation to our culture.
Great to learn differences between pseudo left and right.Best video on the issue.
Even he knows about the hypocrisy of ndtv.Glad to here his views and gain knowledge.India Inspires.
I always enjoy David Frawley's talks. Many thanks for uploading this.
india inspires foundation's great work for all Indian knaowledge
wonderful and enlightening discourse Dr Frawley. Many thanks.
A mind bending talk. Thank you very much!
Brilliant lecture and great points raised and espoused with such clarity. Namaskar and pranam
Dr. Frawley , thank you for your contribution on Hinduism. Great books written by you. It is the growing non-Indian Hindus that made many Indian Hindus take a deeper look at science and logic behind our own religion Sanathan dharma way of life. 🙏
Great talk !! Thanks for answering the the questions that were going through my minds for so long.
Rising of Sanatana Dharma, Karma yoga and Indian cognitive Science and value system is the solution of all the problems in India.
+Tejasvi Joshi I think the rising of a widespread, deep and sincere practice of Dharmic religions would be the solution of all the problems in the whole World...
+Danilo B But In another video of this channel ,they were showing People of Indian religion will be in minority in 2050. Right now Indian religion has 61% of total population of the Indian subcontinent. Once it reaches to 50% or less Genocide of Hindus/Jains/Buddhist/Sikh will start even today we can see how Hindus is living in difficulty in Pak/Bangladesh and in India Any State, district and villages wherever they are in minority. So Future of Dharmic civilization is not secure.
Well, this is just a projection and we actually don't know what will happen by 2050...as a Buddhist I have to say "nothing at all in this World is secure" ;-)
My feeling is that we're heading towards an huge environmental disaster.
Is there a "demographic emergency"? Yes, there is, but it's a worldwide emergency, as we human are becoming too many and are consuming too many resources and polluting enormously. The result of this could be massive famines, wars and environmental disasters.
No divine power cannot save us but strong will to put the ancient teachings in practice in all their width and depth, both in inner practice and social actions to preserve what is wholesome and really necessary for World peace and prosperity.
I have an anglicised friend born in India Bengal who lives here in Australia, and he behaves exactly in the way that David Frawley mentions at 11:45 minutes when he refers to Indian literary figures who adopt Anglo culture as something progressive and high class. He's actually spot on about how whitewashed Indian intellectuals turn to the Bible, Shakespeare, Marx, and Western literary figures believing they are paragons of high culture. My anglophile knew nothing of the Vedic and Indic Corpus, but was quite proudly an Anglophile. Growing up with Western Literature has shown me only one perspective of things, and I'm very familiar with the romanticism that my Anglophile friend has engaged himself in. But after discovering alternative ideas, and higher spiritual principles in Eastern Sanatana Dharma I came to realise that there were things which surpassed the inferior ideas in Western thought. I found it quite sad, because the New Testament in ENGLISH and Shakespeare is nothing compared to the spiritual wisdom of the Upanishads, and the Bhagavad Gita. The teachings of Ramanujacharya, Adi Shankara, the Sanskrit Language, he has no interest in. Very sad. I could give less than two sh!ts about Shakespeare. I have Bhagavad Gita.
He also know Laloo Yadav.A great scholar.Feeling of nationalism.Jai Ho!
GREAT TALKING! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Great ideas. Makes a lot of sense
Thank you, Dr Frawley, for this important and instructive talk, especially your dissection of the differences between left/right-wing in the West and in India.
One difference of opinion I have with Dr Frawley is his blanket correlation between the Western Leftists-Liberals and Hindu right wing on certain ideas, and his blanket bracketing the western right wing of today as they were in the past. While yes, Christianity continues as the basic weave, but the Neo-Right that is emerging now, in Europe and in the US (especially them opting for Trump) is a new more libertarian right wing - it is a pushback against the Left which seeks to do the same thing it does in India, that is, de-racinate/de-culture people from their own roots. It is a pushback against the growing overbearing dictatorial tendencies and intolerance of the Left. It’s a pushback against the Left using corrupt means, such as the immigration policies, leftist economic policies, increasing govt control policies, etc. to gain and stay in power. Today’s western Neo-Right is trying to do what the Indian right wing wants to do - get people back to their cultural roots. In the West, it’s about reflecting the values that European thinkers strove for; establishing the rule of law, the values of liberty, free speech, and, most importantly supporting the Working Class People - the strata that the elitist Left of today have abandoned, while opting for identity, gender politics and so on.
So, in fact, the Hindu right wing of today has more in common with the western Neo-RightWing of today.
What Dr Frawley overlooked, or didn’t think about, is that today’s Western Leftists are anti-Hindu and pro-Islamists.
Whoa, I've been politically enlightened. I've never thought about this subject before. I will never look at politics the same ever again. Whew, that was too heavy though.
Dear Dr Frawley, Thank you for the bottom of my heart for this talk. Everyone who cares about Indian culture/politics should hear this.
Mr. Frawley, you are indeed super !! Hope India wakes up. India should be Hindu India only
Thanks for thoughts.
Very inspiring and eye-opening lecture, thank you dr. David Frawley
I have attended one of such lecture where swastikas are shown and also Kaki chaddis in a presentation in Germany. The Indian Prof. was degrading Hindu traditional values as superstitious and also quoted Swami Vivekananda as a negative person.
Good speech! Nehru dynasty, crooked left & commis are biggest threat to our great culture.
Some of my friends also want to be liberal minded in order to forget their culture.I let the time teach them a lesson.
Eye opener
People from KERALA much watch this to know what they have been feed with all these years
brillant
Simply devastating articulation. The anti Hindu and anti India forces are becoming more and more encouraged due to political patronage.
That’s why I left Left.
Awesome Dr!
pretty sure "india" doesn't care .. certainly not about anything to do with dharma, or sadhana
Fortunately there are Indians, including NRI's who care
I appreciate your effort, many many thanks to Dr. David frawley
Sir your speech was great, without going into the exact chronology of past, Mahatma Phule emerged in my mind who took into western philosophy and was influenced by the early western writers like Thomas Paine, latter Ambedkarji, called upon the Dalit’s to leave the villages and come to city, and give up caste based skills and acquire non caste based skill, he also said dalits should give up their caste based baluth rights i.e. asking for excess food, used cloths, carrying and eating dead animals from higher caste households, these rights where dived and specified as per sub caste, parallel to this time of history bapuji was trying to homogeneous caste system, but it doesn't look to have happened, what a shudras or ati-shudras where undergoing in the villages did not change, Bapuji was propagating restoration of Village economy and wanted it to restore.
The idea and benefits of Dharma and karmayog benefits, can never reach any Dalits in a village surrounding, unless in rare cases like kabir from lower weaving cast, Tukaram a Vani (shopkeeper) or Gadge Mharaj a dhobi ( washerman) as v don't have legacy of literateness like bhramin. The Brahmin in villages will nonverbally discriminate, like the way they give Prasad or refer to us in Pvt conversation, as their is minimum contact as Brahmins are never in any way homogeneous with the other community in villages, either their contact points with village society are in temple’s or they come into mainstream society in present times as RSS pracharak, in rare occasions they manage shops in villages, or they educate themself out of the villages, and we never see them their after.
The real conflict and oppression in villages comes from the immediate higer sub caste according to hierarchy, be it a superior sahtirya oppressing a inferior shatriya or bottom line ATI Sudra by a higer sub caste of shudra.
When I first voted for BJP, it was because I felt Cong and N.C.P where selectively creating riots and where communal.
After voting BJP I had a perception that Pramod Mahajan & Nitin Gadkari where as corrupt as congress and created riots when it benefited them only difference was congress carried a secular façade.
During Modis election, I did not vote to any party, as far as RSS their agenda on minority and caste is not clear to me, do they condemn caste system and want caste less society. If yes what’s their white paper, having said that I have more affinity towards Sudershanji and I feel he is the elder of my lineage, these kind of affinity I never feel for any congress or Bjp member, but he is a elder who I believe will rub my concerns as non-issue, I believe if I would want his advice.
My best friend in city is from higher caste of another region, I don't have any friend of higher caste in my village, I am from land owning caste higher to us are Brahmins they don't Aquint village squares and village bars, after school very few of my Brahmin fellows have taken priesthood or into shop keeping most of them have left villages, only Brahmin’s other than priests are RSS pracharak who have social contact with me, other than Brahmins the all other caste share the village bars in spite of a internal dynamics of hierarchy these bar patron’s arrive at a homogeneity when in bar.
Dharma and Karma yoga are unachievable in discriminative caste system.
Sir you have ignored y we voted Congress for so long, was it the best party no, it was the best amongst the rascals we believed, but did v have a option, I did not vote modi because, forget Godara, I don't trust solution in Modi's development will redeem majority who are poor.
About animal rights the western librals eat poultry, cattle can be compared to gold for Indian farmers, it bails them out during crises, when cow sale was banned thousands of cow where abandoned by farmers, it did not evoke the spiritual feelings that I thought Hindus should have felt if the decision was popular.
Concluding migration has given anonymity of caste and kind of liberated me and the images of Hinduism has to liberate itself clearly from caste oppression and help me to embrace Dharma and Karma yoga. This will help me stop looking at western ideas for redemption. As swami Vivekananda said remove the costume of caste as caste is not part of the religion, and Ambedkarji said annihilate caste, once we liberate Hinduism from caste it will be easy to look at islam as our own, as my favourite saint says, “Mohammed- the Messenger of equality. You ask, "What good can there be in his religion?" If there was no good, how could it live? The good alone lives, that alone survives”, we got attracted to left liberalism for a reason sir.
it's good that you are following Mohammed and u have found ur rights and opportunity
.. that's great I don't know what rights you have got and equality but still good for you.
great speech
Interesting that Dr. Frawley makes many of the same complaints about the Western left that many Westerners make. The secular left is really a religion and when you view it as a religion then their behavior and dogma makes sense. They define themselves by what and who they hate, not who and what they love. Therefore anyone who loves and who does not hate is the enemy of the left. Much the same as Islam constantly defines itself not by what it is but by what it isn't and by what it hates. Bottom line is that those who are hated by the left and by Islam need to become allies against these two hateful ideologies.
One of my top best favourite videos ever ♥️🙏🏽
What a great talk ! !
Thanks Fraw.
thanks a lot dear Dr. David
Good talk.
The colonaised mind is still same in india.
Its interesting how Hindu practices and traditions like cow protection, vegetarianism, and yoga are associated with left wing politics in the West whilst Hindu traditions are associated with right wing politics in India. I never thought of this. But it does make sense.
I guess with the western left it’s promoted, whilst in the Indian right it’s more imposed.
It was really awesome...
Sir, you have spoken truth blatantly.
Inspiring! Enlightening ❤️
Clear
Boss like
He must be given more publicity
By the way his voice is very youngish
Jai Hind Jai Bharat
excellent
🙏
Nehru was an atheist but I dont recall him rejecting the upanishads. He talks about them in detail in discovery of India. Also he started the IITs , IIMs which are pride of our nation today. But I agree overall there is a colonial hangover in India even today.
Nehru is a very controversial topic even we start reading in depth and with an unbiased mindset..he wasn't a great fan of Indian culture and the discovery of India is not only thing to make an opinion about his works.
31.55
who brings it it all depends on that
अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च:
if mahatma gandhi was not in line with nehru why did he made him the prime minister? why did he insist on hindus only to not retaliate in partion riots?
Please rename it's not India we are BHARAT
We are not Hindus name coined by Greeks and given by cruel mughals to us we are SANATAN that's it
True like secular
Wow
this kind of genius shud only be in devalok
certainly not the govt of the nation
Leftist/modern intellectuals/western educated indians dint blindly followed western ideologies or principles , they blended west and east ideologies according to there context and requirement .They fought against colonialism and countries own upliftment. Indians just took education to increase awareness among themselves not to get blindly driven by western ideas , they had there own consciousness , they wer motivated according to reason , truth and science .They wanted change in religion for sake of social comfort and countries adavantage. They wer never against there own religion or culture , they wer against ills in native culture like exploitative caste hierarchy , social injustice , degarded women status , unequal rights , superstition ,female infanticides . They wer never anti hindus , religion was never targetted , they just targetted undesired by-products of religion. They just wanted to weed out social evils they fought against colonialist , imperialist and capitalist . They never rejected vedas and upanisads ,they wer against social coercion due to religion . They reformed social and religious life for socio cultural regeneration of india . They are not cultural colonoalist.
bull shit!
Remember how they burnt temples in China .. It was horrible
It isn't right to say that Britain colonised a country when they conquer India ,because there wasn't one country but many countries in India or South Asia,so right from the beginning this man is bullsh-tting.
go and read about aryavat or the history of India and again it seems like you are having a colonist mindset..
good for you and it's not about what British did or not.. it's about today
@@sameerjha6562 Thank you for your reply Sameer but you are talking like narrow minded hindutva parrot,let's see when the British arrive in South Asia there was in Bengal a country called the Nawabs of Bengal which were vassal to the falling Moghuls, the Islamic empire of Hindustan,an emerging but short lived Hindu Maratha empire and up North West there was the empire of Ranjeev Singh,all those countries were in the territories of what is today Pakistan,India and Bangladesh,not to mention the Princely states,so by any counts that doesn't make a country ,they were separated countries with kings and capital cities ,with different religions and different languages in the same way as India today is not part of Pakistan ,or Pakistan part of India and the same goes for Bangladesh ,so when some one is referring to India as a country before 1947 ,is talking rubbish,for the entire history of South Asia foreigners refer to India as a cultural entity not as a political entity or country or state,even the cruel and murderous king Ashoka or ChandAshoka didn't conquer the entire subcontinent ,he didn't conquer the Dravidian South ,you see I used the proper word conquer not like some of your hilarious historians that said wrongly that he united India,how come?like in the complete obliteration of the Kingdom of Kalinga?Those were the acts of a butcher king pretending to be a pious Buddhist,now when you tell me to read "aryavat"as you baptise it I presume that you are referring to ARYAVARTA,please at least if you try to give me "lessons" in Indian history can you at least do the correct spelling to avoid confusions,now yes I read the Dharmashastras where is talking about the Aryans coming to South Asia and looking down to the local people like Adavasi and the Dravidians a practice which continues to this day,anything else can you teach me because so far you just call me a colonist,please try to admit to yourself that there are people of European origin that might be better than you chumpy at your own history ,please get a education and learn to control emotions ,OK buddy,now take good care of yourself ,so long buddy.
Frawley contradicts himself in his haste to discredit leftist liberals in India. In the beginning he was seen saying that the Chinese communists were against their own culture and traditions. Then coming to 34 minutes into the talk he says that Chinese communists were nationalists who embraced their culture and traditions.
He meant Mao’s Communists as opposed to the post-Mao Communists
@@ritaputatunda Ok. So we can safely conclude that unlike the Mao communists the post Mao communists have taken a right shift. Why does Crawley not aknowledge the same in India? He blindly supports the Indian right wing which resorts to blatant lies that Indian leftists are supporting China even on issues of national security supposedly due to their ideological affiliation. The DYFI which is the youth wing of the CPIM celebrates Sri Krishna Jayanthi every year. That itself talks volumes about the change in their attitude towards indigenous culture just like it happened in the case of Post Mao Chinese communists.
@@anilkanacherry6154 lol they were coming on debates during India-china face-off anybody who have some sense can see whom they were supporting. How one CPIM youth leader attacked wistron that created hesitancy among investors with people. How they shut down Sterlite copper plant that turned India into a copper importer from a leading exporter and benefited China. There's a tweet of your leader whatever his name is some Yechury where he's standing with Xi and it's written that he'll work with his boss or maybe leader (I don't remember the exact term) for ideology. So kindly shut up and don't bring absurd arguments in defence of your ideological fathers.
@@anilkanacherry6154 celebrating Shri Krishna doesn't mean anything as they're so many who do all kinds of evil while are great worshippers (I can't say that they're even worshippers or not). These are the same people who celebrate Mahishasura and call maa durga a prostitute. Have some shame you bigot. How can you even think of defending such low lifes?! Maybe you're one of them isn't it?!
Sawapan das gupta is bestttt
What about Bajrang dal?
This was rambling dribble, Mao moved China in a direction whereby they have left behind the Century of Humiliation whereas the current rightwing BJP/RSS has no goal or plan to move its citizens out of poverty (reading the Gita won't accomplish anything). Also India as a member of the Quad is still colonized so I'm not sure how Mr. Frawley's viewpoints helps in developing a mind separate from its colonizers.
Mr. Fawley says much but his talking points reveal nothing except reinforce the current Hindu flex and bias (i.e. India is great etc. (BTW there was no India prior to the British))
I'm a 19 year old. I haven't read many books. I could find so many holes in his logic it's like a sponge.
Yep
And that's why he won't talk to uneducated people 😉
Good job exposing the self.
Keep it up
Liberal destroyed huh.
@@aagantuk7370 nope exposed
Destruction bhi kar dijiye janab
@@aagantuk7370 jhatta destruction
Koi points to bola hi nhi
Ha malum hai jyada padhe nhi ho books
Ek kaam kar, jakr destruction ka definition book se padh k aja😉
He talks about the left.... 🧐
But doesn't talk about the right🤣 extreams? Why didn't he bring up Italy, Japan, Spain, Austria and Germany.? They promoted culture and religion to extreams and they were wrong and did terrible things too. He is misleading people.
Lol. They have been talked of since long and an Indic person don't give a shit about them. Why are you so rattled if somebody is countering left? You're another zombie, Isn't it? Piddis! One more thing rw of a country always works against rw of another country while lw around the globe is in sync with each other. Second everything is contextual so unless you're educated enough about Indian culture better stfu! You're similar kind of people who say that all religions are the same all teaches peace, there should be no boundaries and similar other bullshit. Educate yourself before dumping your borrowed or imbibed shitty opinions about anything here.
@@user-ft3ep1ep8y Indic People... You just assumed I wasn't.? So right politics is better along with corny capitalism. Is that why India's job market, health care and education system sucks? How is Yoga and Ayurveda working against the pandemic. ? Obviously not well.
@@shrimppaste1692 are u sure about that lol
In fact the first communist was Ram and Kriśna then Buddha :-) 3 of the incarnations of Vasudev (Vishnu) :-)
INNOCENT WIZZARDS
next social-democratic leader will be the Master of the world ... Maitreya
It is not about making name of an Indian in global platform, brining wealth from foreign countries, taking loans from foreign countries, giving away our natural resources is not a right path. Considering GDP as growth will lead us to a disaster.
Please don't praise BJP or any political party, modi also threatened and asked to close GreenPeace and Fossil Free...!
Modi also had collaboration with Karnataka CM who was also into mining scams.
All political parties in India are against development of humans in India.
Of course Modi talks also about poor, but doing against them. All the environmental regulations are violated. More capitalism is a disaster for any country in the world. Modi also approaches wrong concepts of growth, at-least not dharmic and gandhian. Gandhi would have removed modi from PM post for making a statute of worth 2000 crores of Patel.
Even the taxes are increased. The WTO GATS education pact was silently singed. It is stupidity.
+karun kumar you mean to say all development work is against poor? and all leftist work is pro poor? Pl dont fool yourselves.
I can look at the way you speak and tell how this country ran. What school of thoughts we are influenced by, i understood the partwhere you said the colonial history writing but a left tradition which only like people went outside to study i assume dr ambedkar, nehru , patel...many more but Ambedkar had his agenda based on how he was treated, Nehru was from much more wider perspective as like a world leader (A leader of vision which is not narrowed by culture or religion, pure human spirit if he is left it was good to have for young India) and Patel more leaned to the Hindus for natural reasons of his upbringing and the place he grew. if at all you are supporting BJP , and you so interested in Hindutva as a nationality then you are in wrong place, we been living in this country for quite few years without any communal war, all of a sudden a foreigner came to support BJP intellectuals the so called the Bakths supporter, we clearly know you been paid or allow to make money out of it which you can, but when you say left people burned buddha books, again you are proving to be a twisted person, according to what we know about the ethnography, there was jains and Buddhists, there were nothing called Hinduism, old people in india seems to have no sense other than the scarifies, Yagas, and hierarchy social system, what are you up to swamiji....have ever read any part of Alberuni or Megasthenes.....you are not doing justice as a public intellect, you are being one sided and trying to divide india ....we have only history that started 1947 , we know that is the only history that save all Indians from people like you! the kind that of people who would lie about anything and try an rewrite history for their fundamentalist idea ! you get no respect!
Nehru was the worst curse that happened to India after 1947. He had no understanding of India's ancient dharma & karma. Was only interested in continuing the British imperialism in disguise. He was a servant of the British, communists, socialists and minorities.
The biggest curse was his disrespect of India's hertiage and culture before the British & Islamic invasions
@@zeaybaanoorie528 Yes sir if you really wanted know how ancient indid ran, read some baba sahib or Alberuni....And in the time of Nehru...There was none other than Nehru to unite the country strategically...there is no politician who still can foresee like him..yes he lost popularity on china issue but Kashmir sir still have no clue how he is wrong when there was no other good options..and sir he was not a indian politician,, he was a world leader he wanted a global connectivity.
@@deenibrahim5617sorry sir ! Nehru was not a world leader. He was an impotent personality who did not want to take the advice of Indian leaders such sardar Patel & Ambedkar. He only wanted to do what the British ordered. He had a mentality of a servant of the british and not the welfare of India.
Nehru is solely responsible for the mess he has created in Kashmir. He wanted to be seen as a great world leader,. That's why he took the matter of Kashmir to the UN. The Congress leadership had advised that it would be bad for India to approach the UN on a matter that could be resolved directly between the maharaja of Kashmir & pak. He was also directly responsible for introducibg article 370 to please his cousin shaikh abdulla.
@@deenibrahim5617 dude
He was simply attracted to someone else's wife
Did everything for that