European colonization of Africa : Every Year
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 янв 2017
- See the colonization of Africa from the first portuguese settlement in Africa in 1415 to the independance of the last british colony of South Rhodesia in 1980.
Only European powers are shown !
Music : Kevin Macleod - All This 
Развлечения
Portugal: First to arrive, last to leave
True from its African colonies, which were impossible to hold. Madeira had no inhabitants when colonized, so yes, it is part of Africa, but (like the Azores) an autonomous part of Portugal rather than an occupied territory.
Always.
The spanish Sahara was the last, unless you count the island in the west coast.
never left
Ronaldo was born in Africa
@@richardweil8813 Cape Verde and São Tomé had no habitants when the portuguese arrived
Sorry for the misspelling of Egypt.
It's not "Egytp", but Egypt.
We (France) still have Mayotte & Réunion (as well as a few lesser islands) between Africa & Madagascar.
But very nice video. Turns out, I myself always had a vision in mind of the colonization era of africa as a period way longer in time but for most of it it was only just bits here and there on the cost lines.
Phew for a second there i thought that i had been spelling egypt wrong my whole life
+POGKPP
Are you a serb? XDDD
wrong, Otoman empire was never colonized by Poland. Funny :)
Only trolls would make a fuzz about a small misspelling
"Free State of Congo" these Belgians and their humor
Lmao
Lmao
It was free to Leopold though
Oh please: ruclips.net/video/6mjGXDlSk0c/видео.html
@@AgarthaFan Leopold's playground is a more accurate name
2:58
3:03
Well that escalated rather quickly
Africa: exists
Europe: its free real estate
@Oricand its absolutely a crime because millions of people's killed by Europeans in whole world
@Oricand yeh but one country Mongolia but only in Asia not all over world like British Spanish and hittler is European too man
Oricand you should be also proud of the mass immigration that your stupid ancestors caused
Yggdrasil yes, into the most depraved hands and form of slavery these ever existed. It was beyond their imaginings. The slavery as practiced by Africans was not chattel slavery. European slavery was crass, vile, and violent on a level never seen before in the history of the world. Africans has no context for that level of brutality and we’re unaware of how sadistic their trade partners were by nature. Their version of slavery was different. It operated much like the European feudal system, but without all of the incest and sharing of their wives with the men of higher status, which was common practice with Europeans.
@Oricand You my friend are piece of shit.
The iberians started it, the iberians haven't quite ended it.
Canarias and Azores are 100% Ethnically European
They will never be given up.
Billyharris110 :D If we consider the whole History the first were the Romans to have a big colony in Africa :)
BulletBill110 *not iberians,PORTUGUESE'S
Constantinopla Read please, Carthage was a phoenician colony and egypt was ruled by tge natives until Alexander conquered it, Europeans have no right to claim North Africa, praise to de Gaulle who ended the last big colony on north african soil.
HellenicMacedonianPatriot You should be ashamed of yourself, i always had respect for Greece since it is one of the few European nations who fought against fascists, and never had imperial ambitions and colonies and its people are God-fearing, Greece is your rightful land, nothing south of Crete belongs to you and shall never belong to you.
France still have territories in Africa: Mayotte, Reunion and others little islands
Maxence Barré. It actually counts its territories as part of its country. That is why France is the country that stretches over the most time lines.
Some Italian islands are also technically in Africa.
Same for Spain and Portugal
They are part of French Republic
@@youcantalwaysgetwhatyouwan6687 they are in Africa the same can be said when France wanted to make Algeria *part of the French republic.....French republic my ass.
Great video, but there are some omissions about Portugal:
-You forgot the Portuguese archipelagos of Cape Verde and São Tomé and Príncipe;
-You also forgot Portuguese Congo (today Cabinda enclave, in Angola) on the north bank of the river Congo mouth;
-Although the French Conquest of Dahomey includes the city of Ajudá (Ouidah), the Fort of São João Batista was a Portuguese sovereign territory until 1961, when the garrison of the fort burned it after they were expelled by the Army of Benin.
But was an amazing work anyways, congratulations👍
Glad you mentioned São João Batista--listed under Ouidah in Wikipedia. In 1961 it was the world's smallest colony (population 5). I'm not sure it was burned, as the article says the residents "tried to", and now the fort is a museum. An interesting story.
Also wat 'bout Polish colonies ?
Sao Joao Batista was once included in the Guinness Book as the smallest polity in the world
@@richardweil8813 Indubitably.
@@SillyUwUBilly Well, Fort James in The Gambia was controlled by Courland, a vassal of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania that had de facto become a Polish vassal.
3:04 "Free State"
I would raise a hand in objection but I don't have any.Avarage Congolese during those times.
That's a technical name, the Free State of Congo wasn't even part of the Belgian empire, it was the personal territory of the Belgian king. He sent his private army to rule it and exploit it. Some American journalists decided to explore it and discovered the barbarity, as a result the Belgian Parliament eventually forcefully took the territory into official rule by the Belgian government, ending the free state. Sadly the Belgian King died peacefully instead having to be held accountable for his crimes.
:V
AnOriginalName
How would he ever be held accountable...
In his defence they gave him that territory so everyone (rich investors) could exploit it (instead of a onestate colony). Free state could not tax so it was very unprofitable for Leo II hence all the economic coercion.
Congo Free Real Estate
1651: Go your home sweden are you drunk?!
It started and ended with Spain and Portugal in Africa
no, it started with Portugal and ended with Portugal
It's ironic that in the 15th-16th century a lot of the explorers of Portugal and Spain were from the Italian peninsula, while the first Italian colony was established at the end of the 19th century.
Diam Zaphkiel
Can you name besides Cristopher Columbus?
Haha, 80% of all the explorers at the time were Portuguese, don't talk shit.
100% of the portuguese explorers were from portugal
3:01 intense colonization start
Cool video but it would've been better if you showed the African countries before and after conquest. It's a little trippy just seeing an empty continent.
There were no countries in africa back then
P.S I was wrong
What I was thinking is the nation states or something like that
@@Polavianus ottoman empire, mali empire or ghana empire, morroco i think, axun or ethiopia
@@Joaco3406 They where still in the Prehistoric Era for the sub saharan
The Spinel there were Maaaaaaany kingdoms tribes and empires there
@@Polavianus countries in Africa existed before Europe.
well done , thx
:)
Great video
Magnificent. Only one forgotten is James Island colony in the mouth of river Gambia, ruled by Courland (autonomous duchy under Polish-Lithuanian regime in modern day Latvia).
Yeah but it would have been too tiny to put on the map, plus it being super obscure for the person making this video.
There's something wrong in the map. In 1471 Guinea wasn't a colonie of Spain, it was of the portuguese sooner before them
Africa: *exists*
Europe: “it’s free real estate”
Its free *congo* state
Did anyone else notice "Egytp?"
yes
Portugal always first.
and last.
Fredericac Keop yap
nope Poland in 1200 colonization gambia first and ottoman empire in 1300 ....
YES FUCK THIS KING POLICS
adi yaf Yes bro Spanish have no right to be in ceuta and melilla, thank God gibraltar is under the British. Makes those spaniards mad.
Denmark had colonies ??!!!!!😨😨😨
Ali Mohamed I thought that was weird too!
Ali Mohamed now african muslims have colonies in denmark😂😂😂
Ali Mohamed Haven't you learned that Norway Greenland and Iceland is Danish colonies?
Ali Mohamed Haha ofcourse scandinavian and muslim
Denmark had also the Virgin Islands in Caribbean, sold them to USA in 1917. And they still have colonies (Greenland and Faroe Islands).
Good content
3:06 Ah yes, the colony of Egytp
*Protectorate
Windows Codenamed Memphis
Egytp
Ethiopia the only world country never colon....
@California Cowboy it was never colonized by Italy it was occupied... two totally different things..
@unknown unknown 👆
unknown unknown Liberia was colonized...
@Glory to kemet Liberia was colonized by the USA for a few years to send freed slaves back to Africa, then given independence. Ethiopia was occupied, not colonized.
@i don't know what Ethiopia don't colonized we eon Italy
Free State of Congo was not under Belgian leadership until 1906, it was private property of King Leopold II of Belgium
thx i in 4th grade learning about this!
Portugal and Spain: We will take africa we will be so Strong! 1:15
Portugal and Spain: Holy S... 3:15
are you blind to the color purple. ? look again
3:13 Egytp
Africa in 1880: Exists
Europe in 1880: It is free real estate.
Good video, much better than that other one by the German guy
between 1885-1899 Sudan was not under British rule, Sudan had driven out the ottomans in 1885 and was controlled by Sudanese people until the british empire came back in 1899
You forgot South-West Africa (now Namibia) which was a colony until the 90s
Can you see that he removed The Union of South Africa when it received Dominion status in 1910?
Zanzibar wasn’t part of German East Africa it was British.
Other then that good job!
I never thought Ikea colonized africa
Poland can't in to space...But it can in to colonization of africa (polish Colony in gambia)
KURWA
The Gambia ... Not Gambia
And also in Tobago :D
(And they thought to get Madagascar and Liberia, but USA was pissed off and forced Poland to go away even if liberians wanted poles to be there)
That was actually Courland, a vassal state of Poland. The colonization had nothing to do with Poland.
Portugal
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Britain
Denmark
France
Germany
Belgium
Italy
Nathaniel Hermanson may they all burn in hell
@Meme King if you are racist you are exactly like them
Courland and russia too
Courland haves cities in gambia and russia sagalo
What about Poland? Had 1 island.
Christophorus Claudius where?
Christophorus Claudius where ?
In the Gambia
island Kunta Kinteh
Christophorus Claudius Kunta Kinte was a man not a island😂
Bro we watched this in class and everybody laughed so hard at seeing the channel pfp at the end 💀
@ANGLO-SAXONS yea i saw that lmao
Damn! In most of African countries, colonization only lasted 75 years! That's what they cry so much about? Could you please do a video too about the colonization of Europe by Turks, Arabs, Huns, Mongols and other non-Whites during millenia? And don't forget to mention Tracia as a remanent colony of Turkey. And all the other areas that invaders are occupying demographically today, which are a lot, by the way.
Because is never happened
Wait until you find out about the fact these 75 years took their out of prehistory.
Dakar, Bamako, Nairobi, Ouagadougou, Abidjan, Kinshasa....all their capital cities were neolihic villages in the 1880s and modern cities in 1960.
Not really “colonisation” mate. You’d be right if Europe was a barbarian decentralised continent, but it wasn’t.
@@jahahhaha7149 yeah Europe fought back, they defeated the invaders and conquered the world. Props to Europeans, they are the reason the world is connected and globalisation happened.
Turks never colonized africa.
Nice Video, WRONG END, the colonies did Not End but Working from the Back Door
Wtf are you trying to say? are you talking about the commonwealth?
@@RUclipsIsBad111 no he's talking about human trafficking, stealing of resources and europe killing off anyone who could develop the nation
@@OwnM3Z0 you can rise and develop your nation then you monkehead.
what about Réunion and Mayotte?
you are the new Emperor Tigerstar!
I'm surprised that the ottoman empire is not here, but great video.
this video is about european colonization, not any other continent
the ottoman empire never was a colonial emipre europe make in the history money whit slaves but ottoman had only 8years salves than they prhoibited the salve systme and ottoman give all the africans in the ottoman empire land to apologize but this make ottoman not better its not a long time but they cant give the time back the africans
ottomans in lybia and egypt?
Music?
Portugal, early dinner guests who stay all night
ottoman whre ara there ?
good spelling of Egypt...
why do south africa and egypt cease to appear as british at the beginning of the 20th C? they gained independence much later i thought
Am I blind or you didn't mentioned here about Courland :v
Interesting video, but, perhaps you could have included the Ottomans, Arabs etc as a general scramble for Africa, not just the Europeans. Anyway, the Belgians in the Congo were probably the most brutal.
It’s different, it was khalifat, in Quran every Muslim desires for khalifate, it’s a unity, it’s a brotherhood, it’s one country different states union, in Islam Quran says :, verily believers are brothers, so doesn’t matter Russia or Antarctica if one is a Muslim then he is a brother and he has got rights, must not be offended and etc.
@@justworship0570 Tell that to the Moroccans who enslaved their fellow Muslims from Mali
What about the Ottoman Empire? They had North Africa and Sudan for a long time.
Prins van Oranje yeah but that was and empire, a colony is a controlled territory overseas
ottoman. empire not colonial empire
affetmez pvp true.
Ottoman not like netherlands because all of Muslim and New Ottoman Empire come 2023 Die for AtaKamal
Prins van Oranje. Remember that the ottoman empire does not exist like a country anymore unlike the UK or France. Also unlike most countries that colonised, its colonies was connected to its capital.
Sees Brandenburg-Prussia for a few years.
WAIT WOTWOTWOT
The German territory by present day South Africa was present day Namibia?
emmmmm sweden okay . i knowed about belgium but sweden :0
just a tiny little trading colony during their period of empire in Europe.
nothing special really.
lol , Sweden and Denmark?
Can I may this song
from where is this song
世界の覇者4 bgm
1890’s: *e g y t p*
Fun fact:
The fall of Dien Bien Phu (Vietnam) in 1954 marked the end of French worldwide colonial empire. Two years later in 1956, Tunisia and Morocco (3:25) obtained independence, after which France became bogged down in the Algerian campaign, sounding the death knell for a French colonial army forced to call on conscripts.
you know, aside from algeria, the french population really had no interest in the colony, they were becoming a burden economically and all they did was make france look bigger.the people wanted to focus on ww2 reparation and that's part of the reason why france lost its empire.
same thing for algeria exept the french population wanted to keep it so they had to call a historical figure in order to release it.
if the french wanted it they could have easily kept their colony until the late 1900 but they would have fallen behind economically
@@firecreeper2249 No, if they would have want to kept their colony the couldn't because the algerian population was forming the army and would have kick the ass of France out of Algeria quickly. The algerian population was 10 millions against 1 million and also french population feared and quitted. They algerians had many losses but they were stronger.
@@akbeh the algerians were in no way stronger, militias are NEVER stronger than great powers, idk how you got that idea, like maybe you're gonna give me the example of the algerian winning one battle with hard odds, but winning battles don't make you win wars.
If France wanted they could have easily starved the population and made examples so resistants lose public support and supplies, france didn't do that because algeria was deemed too much trouble for what it's worth(which we might argue was somewhat wrong since france with algeria's population and ressources would be much more important)
maybe I'm wrong since I don't know much about the algerian independance war, but so far ,looking on my own and asking algerian, it seems the fln was just a big militia that didn't hold any territories bigger than a village,
if you have proof of the opposite, please share them, I'd like to know more about this conflict
@@firecreeper2249 At the end of War, it wasn't the FLN fighting more but the population was insurging, with 11 December 1960 manifestation. And population was already starving and the more they suffer, the more they fight the colonial power. 1 Million and half algerians died in War. The Algerian nation had a great history and it's culture was middle-eastern with islamic relgion, so the population don't accept to be ruled by Europeans. It's more a question of dignity than starvation. Just see the Japanese patriotism (in WWII), so it's same for Algeria. Morroco and Tunisia weren't patriotic as Algeria so they didn't fight too much. Also, Algeria is a country that made one of greatest wars of Revolution in History. The strategy of FLN was to hide in cities and mountains and to make guerrillos attacks, so they won't say : " hello everybody I hold a town" because they will be attacked. I suggest you to see the films : The Battle of Algiers and Algerian war films (like Mostefa BenBoulaïd, opium and stick, patrol in east, Lotfi, etc.)
@@akbeh Would you happen to have sources other than films? I'd like to believe you but there's a chance what you're telling me is romanticised, in comparison, I'd get similar comment about the french resistance during ww2 while in reality they didn't do much. It's not that I don't trust you or that I'm anti algerian, it's just that I'd like to be sure to have a non biased understanding
Though (in case it's not clear)I did appreciate that you took the time to write that much, thank you for that
Somebody should do one with the African tribes and land grabs like Shaka Zulu
cool
Funny fact, first humans were raised in ethiopia 200000 years ago and ethiopia was the only african country that never was colonized
Wilson Canada Ethiopia was occupied by Italy in 1936 and became a part of the Italian colony Italian East Africa...
CK Lim Somalia too
@@Rickel2Hero The campaign resulted in a failure anyway. It was briefly colonized, but not during the Berlin conference, which took place in 1884. Italians tried to conquer it in 1896, but failed. Fun fact: italians were losing in the 2nd italo-ethiopian war. So much so, that they decided to use poison/mustard gas. And that's why they won. Obviously, Italy was kicked from the League of Nations. In the end, Ethiopia was freed by the brits and ethiopian partisans in 1941.
Ethiopia was never colonized.
Yes it was. 1936
Gustavo Larancia but that's not colonization you might as well say nazi Germany colonize France then
Dante Cammz every single kingdom in Africa wau occupied. There weren't tribes in primordial state, but kingdoms.
jesus christ, the campaign of Ethiopia is a part of italian colonialism. All kingdoms in Africa were colonized by Europeans. Colonialism means occupation and exploitation of the area and native people by political agencies controlled by the european state. Ethiopia was controlled by A.O.I. for example. Anyway even in your definition i can see an incredible mistake: a lot of Italian migrated in Libia and Ethiopia: this was one of the factor to justify racial laws.
In 3 years, more 35000 italians left Italy to Ethiopia, because the regime tried to make this area more productive. After WW2 people started to leave Ethiopia, beacause of sociale tensions
it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italo-eritrei
it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emigrazione_italiana_in_Africa_Orientale
it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italo-etiopici
it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italo-somali
(it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italo-libici )
have a look, translate it
'merchandise swaps'
Portugal and Spain: We explore, we stay
1884: Invention of the machine gun :-(
At 2:40 you see the second biggest mistake the Netherlands ever made, to trade over the African colonies in Africa to the UK.
For anyone wondering, the biggest one was to trade New Amsterdam to the UK... now known as New York...
Kevin Spee "african colonies in africa"
DanielMorenoTV lol mistake made
Kevin Spee its ok bro😂😂😂
it wasn't trade, in both cases it was taken from the dutch by force
Kevin Spee
They weren't traded, the British took them from the Batavian Republic. In fact this video is wrong, the British took the Cape Colony in 1795 (i.e. 2:32), but gave it back in the Treaty of Amiens.
Cool video, but you seemed to have forgotten Liberia? It was an American colony with the goal of sending African Americans back to Africa so as to avoid racial conflicts and have a peaceful end to slavery. It became independent and was never conquered by European powers.
America isn't European
Nobody is talking of the swedish conquest of Africa in 1650...
Still no respect for Courland's episode in Gambia...
I smoke you up fam
good
Liberia: grabs popcorn
Am so happy that my Country is in White 💯🔥
Lol fuck u racist
@@user-lb6gv5fd3r
He is talking about how his country was never colonized
OHEI JOSEKEI
You forgot the tiny polish colony
Colonization of Indonesia please
. ethiopia wasnt colonized it was just occupized
same thing
Your profile avatars...
Narroly it was colonized after Ethiopia surrendered in 1936
Damien Pimentel nope it wasn't
It was administered by the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_the_Colonies_(Italy) as part of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_East_Africa
Very important and overlooked historical information. Bravo. A major factor in the current mass migration from poorer countries in Africa and other parts of the globe to richer countries in Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand. The richer countries didn't get rich automatically!
No countries get rich automatically, European culture ensured that Europe was prosperous long before Africa was colonized. Just as it ensured that America, Canada, New Zealand and Australia become prosperous once Europeans established themselves.
@@oisinoc It's called accumulation of raw resources! That's why invading and colonizing countries get rich, even today! Europe was in the dark ages for centuries! With the development of better ships, firearms, and industrialization, able to dominate the globe past five hundred years, using white skin color as an excuse!
@@raminkhajavi9513 So Africans had access to Africa's enormous resources for millennia but could not get rich from them? Interesting. Who developed these better ships and industrialization? Europeans. Europe's prosperity was its people, everything else came from that. :)
@@oisinoc yes africa had rich civilizations before european colonizers. Not just accumulation of raw resources (invasions), but also cheap labour (slavery) is how empires got rich. That's how Europe "prospered and everything else came from that" past five hundred years. Science, knowledge, and technology is not just a european innovation, but traverses throughout time and region. For example, the chariot 2500bce central asia. The arab Muslim empire also contributed tremendously to civilization as we know it, and transferred much knowledge to Europe. Yes, european people innovators also, but in order for empires to gain wealth, it's called invasions, colonization of others for cheap surplus labor and resources. Just like today! Most of the resources and products of cheap labour ends up in "first world" countries, which export weapons and bombs, to b dropped elsewhere.
@@oisinoc according to one of my fave lecturer scholars pre computer days, Joseph Campbell, said, wars of attrition, mass subjugation of others, slavery, began with first empires, when men started making temples for themselves and calling themselves king of kings, around 2500 bce mesopotamia. But egyptian empire was started even earlier! Then it just went from empire to empire! European world dominance for past 500 years. A good example of difference of cultural mindset is when Columbus landed, "the natives are so friendly, nice, and hospitable. They bear many gifts. They will make good slaves."
Im doing study about history education noo. Please make a video about Colonialization of Indonesia. Im a teacher on Indonesia.
Please
Check out a channel called "Lazardi wong Jogja" hope this helps!
Thanks but Sorry i cant find a video about Netherlan, england,spanyol, and portugal Colonialization in that channel
3:01
Africa will be a united superpower in 50 years, mark my words.
Highly unlikely considering the closest any native 'African' empire has gotten to controlling the entire continent are 3 major groups. In East 'Africa', twice; Aksum & the Ethiopia. In West 'Africa' thrice. Almohad (Algeria/Morocco),Songhai, & Mali. In the north by Egypt three times. Fatimid, Ayyubid, & Mamluk. In the east they never went past 1.3 million km^2. The west at most they reached was about 2.3 million km^2(1.4 for Songhai & 1.1 for Mali). The north between 2 and 4.1 million km^2. Other than these no other native 'African' kingdom and or Empire has went past the one million km^2 mark. The other closest one was the Kongo Empire about 780K km^2 if I remember correctly. Making it possibly the 9th largest native empire. So what most likely is going to happen in the next 5 decades to 1 century is that 'Africa' will steadily normalize back to its historical size of its nations. Making it likely that Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Nigeria, Mali, & Ethiopia will change the least in territorial size. While the others will split into several different countries.
"Africa will be a united superpower in 50 years, mark my words."
That's a good one. 😆
once they get political leaders that are actually smart & care about their people, then maybe
No lol
@@EtneoMappingAnimation
yes we will
1:59 Prussia?!
prussia is what became germany
0:24
What about the Greek and Phoenician colonies? Yeah Phoenicia wasn’t technically in Europe but Greece was so wouldn’t that count?
The vídeo starts in 1400-s, not in somewhere else 1000 years before year 1.
Phoenicians are not Europeans in the first place they are just like the Arabs and so their language and religion .
@@user-ui3pw1ys3k that's what he said. And not all Arabs have same religion.
What about a Polish colony in Gambia 1651-1661 ??
WrigleyTV it is kind of brief if you consider how long most countries occupied territories in Africa.
1200s
Slavic nations never had colonies
Mr. Mike nah, Siberia, Russian america and the Kazakhstan area-ish.
Although if you are talking just about Africa you are right.
Ethiopia was never colonized
Nerded Out Ethiopia was never italian, they never rulled or controlled ethiopia and Egypt was definitly colonized by british for more than 20/30 years
Nerded Out it was a war, invasion and u r right their goal was colonize Eth but Mission failed. Sorry
Nope. A first war against Ethiopian happened in the middle of 1890s, when Crispi was President. The campaign was a total defeat. For this reason, under Mussolini, a military campaign was organized, just for prestige and national pride (revange for the previous defeat). Ethiopia officially gave up 5 May 1936 with the occupation of Addis Abeba.
Internal conflicts with "Arbegnuoc" is a different issue
How do you study history?
Gustavo Larancia and Nerded Out in your dreams may be or in your wish lists
Nerded Out, by your logic France and Czechoslovakia were colonized by Germany during WWII.
You ve forgoten ethiopia for italy
Which had the most territory in africa
Ww2: *WHY HELLO THERE*
Africa: *yes*
Afrika
Wow. It's insane what we western Europeans have accomplished. How much land we ruled and how powerful we still are. We also did some bad stuff but seeing this also kinda makes me proud. The British, the French or the Germans and many more. And of course our best friend the strongest nation on earth, the US which we Europeans founded.
Kinda?
The leftists and blacks have stopped you from fully embracing how great our Nations were.
@@gloomsouls lol ur racist . rwandan genocide . enslaving locals of a country . so proud of yall
@@mahadbahad9895 While the Africans themselves sold their own people, go learn real history then come back.😂
Being proud of what your ancestors did is cringe. You had nothing to do with it. Take pride in your own accomplishments. This also goes for sub-Saharan Africans that claim to be of Egyptian decent.
@@gloomsouls So you're forgetting the slave trade of famines in India? Europeans took advantage of africans selling their slaves.
Battle of three king Portugal : WTF
Sakonmynuts
As an African i really cry when I watch the video💔😭Africa is an oppressed continent.
We Europeans also did some good stuff down there
@Adrit Roy Africa is not country we are continent . We in North Africa had a civilization before European colonization
@Adrit Roy
You did not lie about these points. The biggest corruption are our governments who left us at your mercy
@@LOLXD-sf4yd That doesn’t change the situation
@@stantorren4400 Well they had plenty of time to recover
3:03 berlin conference
1:45
*Sweden has joined the chat.*
Sweden: Hey what's up everyone?
*Denmark, France and England have joined the chat.*
Sweden: Yep I'm out, cya
*Sweden has left the chat.*
I Have Never Seen Such Beautiful Country Like Egytp!
Yay! Sweden! Oh no, wait, its gone...
Vilgot Norén hehe precis
ShaDoW colonialism and imperialism are not something to be proud of.
@@ekinyanksahin2635 This is colonization...not colonialism ruclips.net/video/igQEvBShfu0/видео.html