PERFECT ACAAN Revealed? - Penn & Teller FOOL US Emily Robinson-Hardy S10E19
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 апр 2024
- Here's the original performance:
• Holy Grail of Magic Il...
Emily Robinson-Hardy performs an outstanding version of the Any Card at Any Number magic trick routine made famous by David Berglas. This performance must be one of the best, it fooled Penn and Teller! Here I will try and guess how I think it was achieved, I may be wrong or right, you let me know in the comments.
============================================================
Learn Easy Card Tricks with New Book from Amazon
Worldwide search for Totally Magic Card Tricks or
Click link for UK Amazon: amzn.to/2EyO1aA
============================================================
Check out the merchandise.
Please support our small channel and be part of the group.
Comments and Likes much appreciated.
Contact me directly via totallymagicuk@gmail.com
#TotallyMagic
I agree the method is likely similar to this. Voice recognition embedded in the microphone could make things easier to pull off with less hand movement. Trigger voice recognition for the girl. The embedded processor determines the position from the recognized card and suit. Trigger the audio of the position when asking the gentleman.
I think you’re spot on. I went and watched the performance, and the 47 does not match the way his lips were moving. Plus, it’s subtle, but he had a weird reaction right after he spoke, as if that’s not what he said. Great job working this one out.
Just seen this. We were there at the filming at the Rio. The man did say that number 47. Everyone was asking him afterwards, and he says he said 47... the lady also said 6 spades and we could hear this clearly... the mic was given to her after she walked on stage by a tech man...
The fact she told both of them not to show any reaction supports your solution. Also at the end she asks to rename the card she selected but she did not ask him to rename his number.; Good Job.
That's why she didn't use Penn & Teller and she purposely chooses a person who resembles the voice that she was going to use
Well done for the analysis of the routine. I immediately checked the synchronization between the guy's speech and the number 47 and you are right! He didn't say 47! Well done. I believe your analysis is correct.
Sounds like you cracked it. I don't think though that she needed to press any buttons on the microphone. A stooge in the audience could have transmitted by radio the information (six of spades) to the microphone.
Now I can sleep. Thank you!
I believe you nailed it!! As i watched the performance last friday evening the first immediate clue i noticed was that she did not invite Pen and Teller onto the stage to be the volunteers!! Or since Teller doesn't speak when on stage as part of their gimmick, i thought why did Emily not have called Pen and the lovely Brook onto the stage?? Now through your thoughts on how you think it was done i can see it is because Pen's rather gravel pit voice would not have matched the male voice we heard from the gimmicked mic !!! Thank-you for your wonderful channel!! Gary in dreamland; have a nice dream!!! 🌟🌟🌟☁️🙂☁️👍👍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🍬🍬🍬☁️⏰☁️ dream!!
That's at least the 3rd time they've been fooled by technology (rather than sleight of hand)...
Close but wrong
Bravo! That was a proper Sherlock Homes analysis! I think you hit the nail on the head - what a truly ingenious method. I guess there are quite a few ways of getting the correct number out - possibly someone off stage, especially if there isn't a traditional stack to be seen - say, they have a cue sheet for card to position. However that bit is done - the method is.
I believe it's actually easier than you think...
Brilliant! I was completely fooled until you suggested this outrageously clever lateral thinking!
Brilliant breakdown! Great job!
It was a great trick.
I went back and watched him say his chosen number a few times. It seems like he says "17". Also, I noticed a little head tilt after he says his number, as someone would do if they were confused, like when another voice says 47 when you just said 17. Totally Magic, I think you're spot on!! Thanks for the video!
Great to have this explanation! When I first watched this trick, I was stumped. All I could think of was that every card was a hi-tech device with an LED display that could be programmed remotely to display whatever card that was sent to it electronically. Then I thought that having 52 of these cards that looked perfecrtly like normal large cards would be super expensive, so I started thinking maybe there is one L:ED card, and maybe an assistamnt in the table that manages to position that LED card into the correct position in the desk. But this had too manby complications and I ended up getting lost in the weeds trying to guess how they would resolve all of those issues. Your explanation seems spot on!
Great deduction as always.
Excellent brake down on Emily Robinsons act with a well thought out very strong possibility for the method.Your Good friends circuit building skills proves the possibility of your theory. Well done