Excellent work. I'd love to be a fly on the wall watching Goofy with his head in his hands trying to come up with explanations why his theory is never validated.
Thanks Stephen! Well if you watch his latest video, he does it by simply ignoring the evidence and saying that conventional science has zero evidence. He now only emphasizes to show that it takes 25x the gasoline to 5x as fast etc.....as this is an experiment that you can't find anywhere. However ofcourse he ignores all the dozens of other experiments that he has proposed, but all of them proved him wrong. If we can't proof that it takes 25x the fuel, than all the other experiments become invalid.
@@disparslab326 And if anyone bothered doing a scientific study of gasoline needed to go 5 x faster, he'd start making claims about rocket fuel, knowing we don't have a rocket. If we had a rocket, he'd make it about something else we don't have - a Sherman tank lol - just like he knows none of us have a wrecking ball or a bowling alley - whatever it is we haven't got, that's what he wants to use. 3.5 years ago he didn;t think any of us had springs just because he didn't - so he could make claims he never thought any of us would be able to test, just because he couldn't or wouldn't spend a penny on springs. He was wrong. Levers never even crossed his feeble mind until I used one to achieve the two velocities. He took a week off and came back claiming levers couldn't do this. A month or so later, levers were central to his claim. Like MindlessMarbles say's, he's a PoS. He cited airtracks were the only way to test because he didn;t think any of us would ever have one. Wrong again. He didn;t think we would ever have timers or slo mo cameras just because the only ones he was willing to invest in were for his "outdoor pursuits" we can only imagine lol! His attempts to compete on the cheap by making a so called airtrack out of waste pipe and a leaf blower were just laughable from the "man" endlessly bragging about money. He's given us plenty of entertainment though so I guess he's earning his keep without having to actually invest in a clown costume or car that falls apart. His ideas fall apart quicker than any clown car.
We don't know the exact amount of energy from the spring, nor do we know how much energy is consumed by the joist. So we have to measure the velocity of one probe, to predict the velocity of the other. The predictions from the equations were confirmed by the experiment. Equations: v1 = v2 × √(m2/m1) v2 = v1 × √(m1/m2) Derived from: E = ½ * I * ω² I = m × r² ω = θ/t ω = v/r mgh = ½mv²
Why not measure the time between the launch and a second time measurement when the pendulum returns? You would be able to calculate the force on both distances?
@@disparslab326 You should try my method No 2 - I go through hundreds of elastic bands until I find one that gives exactly 1.4 x the result. Sometimes I have to sand down a band to achieve this. Then I have to edit the video to make it look like it was not edited. Yes it's a lot of work but it's worth it to stop anyone realising how nature really works. That would be terrible - if people knew we could have free energy as measured by KE OR by momentum.
Funny thing is, this is literally what we would have to do to fake it: spend hours and hours to find out how to fake it. Within this experiment, these were literally the first trials and i got 1.4 straight away. According to Gary, i'm such a desperate religious nutcase that i'm wasting dozens of hours editing and finding out the precise setup to make it come out my way..obviously i know the truth and i got these results within the first few trials, the same for all the previous experiments...how do you explain that? Well you can't , you would have to lie!.@@stephenbrough8132
Excellent work. I'd love to be a fly on the wall watching Goofy with his head in his hands trying to come up with explanations why his theory is never validated.
Thanks Stephen!
Well if you watch his latest video, he does it by simply ignoring the evidence and saying that conventional science has zero evidence.
He now only emphasizes to show that it takes 25x the gasoline to 5x as fast etc.....as this is an experiment that you can't find anywhere. However ofcourse he ignores all the dozens of other experiments that he has proposed, but all of them proved him wrong. If we can't proof that it takes 25x the fuel, than all the other experiments become invalid.
@@disparslab326 And if anyone bothered doing a scientific study of gasoline needed to go 5 x faster, he'd start making claims about rocket fuel, knowing we don't have a rocket. If we had a rocket, he'd make it about something else we don't have - a Sherman tank lol - just like he knows none of us have a wrecking ball or a bowling alley - whatever it is we haven't got, that's what he wants to use. 3.5 years ago he didn;t think any of us had springs just because he didn't - so he could make claims he never thought any of us would be able to test, just because he couldn't or wouldn't spend a penny on springs. He was wrong. Levers never even crossed his feeble mind until I used one to achieve the two velocities. He took a week off and came back claiming levers couldn't do this. A month or so later, levers were central to his claim. Like MindlessMarbles say's, he's a PoS. He cited airtracks were the only way to test because he didn;t think any of us would ever have one. Wrong again. He didn;t think we would ever have timers or slo mo cameras just because the only ones he was willing to invest in were for his "outdoor pursuits" we can only imagine lol! His attempts to compete on the cheap by making a so called airtrack out of waste pipe and a leaf blower were just laughable from the "man" endlessly bragging about money. He's given us plenty of entertainment though so I guess he's earning his keep without having to actually invest in a clown costume or car that falls apart. His ideas fall apart quicker than any clown car.
If the energy of the spring is x
then what equation would predict the velocity?
We don't know the exact amount of energy from the spring, nor do we know how much energy is consumed by the joist.
So we have to measure the velocity of one probe, to predict the velocity of the other.
The predictions from the equations were confirmed by the experiment.
Equations:
v1 = v2 × √(m2/m1)
v2 = v1 × √(m1/m2)
Derived from:
E = ½ * I * ω²
I = m × r²
ω = θ/t
ω = v/r
mgh = ½mv²
Why not measure the time between the launch and a second time measurement when the pendulum returns? You would be able to calculate the force on both distances?
Interesting, yes i could definitely try that out!
Not sure how you're cheating this?
It's the hand release Ian, i know exactly how slowly i should let the one mass go 😉
@@disparslab326 You should try my method - I just fill the room with a different gas that gives exactly 1.4 x the result.
@@disparslab326 You should try my method No 2 - I go through hundreds of elastic bands until I find one that gives exactly 1.4 x the result. Sometimes I have to sand down a band to achieve this. Then I have to edit the video to make it look like it was not edited. Yes it's a lot of work but it's worth it to stop anyone realising how nature really works. That would be terrible - if people knew we could have free energy as measured by KE OR by momentum.
Funny thing is, this is literally what we would have to do to fake it: spend hours and hours to find out how to fake it.
Within this experiment, these were literally the first trials and i got 1.4 straight away. According to Gary, i'm such a desperate religious nutcase that i'm wasting dozens of hours editing and finding out the precise setup to make it come out my way..obviously i know the truth and i got these results within the first few trials, the same for all the previous experiments...how do you explain that? Well you can't , you would have to lie!.@@stephenbrough8132