Roger Ebert interview on Martin Scorsese and the Best Movies (2002)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 фев 2017
- Roger Ebert talks about Martin Scorsese's first film, the best films of the last 25 years, and the slew of great movies that came out in 2002.
Check out these Roger Ebert books on Amazon!
The Great Movies: geni.us/FwBBY6
Your Movie Sucks: geni.us/Jb2KZ1
Ebert's Four-Star Reviews: geni.us/wAhYPK
Join us on Patreon! / manufacturingintellect
Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkou...
Share this video!
Get Two Books FREE with a Free Audible Trial: amzn.to/313yfLe
Checking out the affiliate links above helps me bring even more high quality videos to you by earning me a small commission on your purchase. If you have any suggestions for future content, make sure to subscribe on the Patreon page. Thank you for your support! 
Развлечения
Check out these Roger Ebert books on Amazon!
The Great Movies: geni.us/FwBBY6
Your Movie Sucks: geni.us/Jb2KZ1
Ebert's Four-Star Reviews: geni.us/wAhYPK
Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect
Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259
Share this video!
Get Two Books FREE with a Free Audible Trial: amzn.to/313yfLe
Checking out the affiliate links above helps me bring even more high quality videos to you by earning me a small commission on your purchase. If you have any suggestions for future content, make sure to subscribe on the Patreon page. Thank you for your support!
The image of Ebert in a theatre laughing his arse off during Jackass is priceless.
" harry potter and lord of the rings, seems like the franchise thing is the thing now"
Boy was that the understatement of his whole career. That's all it is now!
It has changed, but it is more complicated than "That's all it is now." It feels like there is more small budget films, and non-franchise films now then before. Certainly franchises have taken over the theatres, but on streaming services there is a never ending supply of non-franchise films. And some content that would have been a film 10 years ago like Queens Gambit morphs into a limited series.
And films are nothing but regurgitated lazy horse shit now….nothing but leftist commie propaganda, feminazi propaganda
dont forget Marvel
Yeah, there's something totally reversed from 20 years ago, when people now say they don't want to see a DC movie if there's no chance for a sequel. Previously, most sequels sucked and were just an attempt to cash-in on the name.
Ebert has such a simple grace to the way he conveys his opinions and his truths. Never an everyman (I don't think a critic should ever be) but someone who reached the occasional rare feat of being universally understood
His "truths"? Lol, there is truth, then their is not...
R.I.P Ebert.
That's the way critics should be. Loved this guy!
Ebert is one of my favourite writers. He had such a brilliant way of communicating a director’s vision. I loved reading his reviews every week. I especially liked his zero-star reviews because you really learn about what makes a horrible movie. And those were usually the funniest reviews too!
He loved "Falling Down" from 1993 starring Michael Douglas, he reviewed movies from the perspective of the audience that would watch those movies, not based on whether or not he personally liked the movie.
Delightful man loved film as much as anyone. RIP
God Bless Mr. Ebert... he was so honest, just like Scorsese is now... he called Shakes the Clown "the Citizen Kane of alcoholic clown movies!"
that was actually Betsy Sherman of The Boston Globe
Man, videos like these between Ebert and Charlie Rose, make me wanna talk about movies in my mind.
2002 really was a fantastic year for film. Gangs of New York, Secretary, Adaptation., Punch Drunk Love, even Spielberg who was 2 for 2 in '02 with Minority Report and Catch Me If You Can. It was a great year for well written characters suited with pitch perfect performances by some of the best actors in this generation.
Unfortunately, Gangs of new york is one of scorsese’s weakest
@@achimstrejac6740 To me it's pure guilty pleasure. I watched it countless times.
Gangs is complete crap
Secretary 🔥
And City of God
Roger was always prepared. We miss him
Yeah, Charlie is so out of his depth here.
I love how Roger praises Apocalypse Now.
great film w/ more great lines of any picture I think I ever saw ."how far are you from the river?""the Ohio river sir?"
+Tony M definitely! Hard to believe to most of it was improvised by Brando. Great talent!
" I wanted to tear my teeth out, I didn't know what I wanted to do" Gavin Masterson you're exactly right .he was a real actor. I think he was the best film actor ever .when he spoke that line he meant it. he really was Kurtz. he'd seen too much. Coppola (and my boy Martin Sheen) give you a good back story to prepare you for this guy gone off his rocker. and to think when he showed up they thought the film would be destroyed .he hadn't read 'heart of darkness' as Coppola insisted, and he was fatter than Kurtz would be. yet, when he's on screen, he's brilliant. I would just rationalize it that he got fat sitting out in the jungle eating water buffalo."I used to think that if I died in a bad place my soul would go to Hell. but now? fuuck! I don't care where it goes as long as it ain't here!
'
Best war film ever made. And easily in the top 20 or top 10 films ever made in any category.
He adored Apocalypse Now so do i
I miss Roger
Oh, those were the days! Really good movies, and Robert Ebert was sensational in every way. Thank you for posting.
Roger, not Robert
What a great interview; just honest, curious questions and a couple of really enlightening points.
15:04 "I laughed at Jackass!" Roger Ebert.
Roger, we miss you. Now you're getting the early previews before anyone else. RIP.
Loved what he said about Antwone Fisher!
great conversation, thanks for the upload!
I love how the interview is just a series of, "have you seen this?" Like so many relatable chats with regular folks.
"Let me just interrupt for a minute--"
That could be Charlie's epitaph.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
20 years ago - and a completely different world. Roger noting the theme of "Minority Report" and how "we might lose our privacy." Movies as an American art form, understood by many, and people going to actual theaters to see them as they should be seen. We've lost that. This was before social media completely devoured us. Before people stared into phones. When conversations like this, before Charlie Rose was "cancelled," were a nightly affair that you looked forward to: actual conversation. The fragmentation of our spirits and minds is the story today. And it's deeply troubling.
No. First Charlie Rose had good guests that you wanted to hear what they had to say. But he was ego-centric, trying to prove how clever he was by suggesting answers for his guests. Finally he had multiple allegations of sexual harassment, so he had to go. That crap should have ended after the Anita Hill testimony during the Clarence Thomas hearings in 1991. But since the latter "won" and got a court seat, I guess men in prominent positions figured they could continue to get away with it until the "Me Too" movement of 2017! Twenty six years is another generation.
@@sandal_thong8631excellent points… for a sandal thong..
Ebert was fond of Aguirre: the Wrath of God, one of my very favorite movies too.
Because there's never been anything like it, or anyone like Klaus Kinski
Ebert was a major Werner Herzog advocate.
Great film. Strange, and you have no idea how it'll turn out, but it turns out the only way it could.
I have tried to find it but Netflix and streaming technology killed the local movie rental places and now we are stuck with the lack of depth and blandness of Netflix’s classic movie collection
He would have never believed how long it took for Scorsese to win Best Director if you told him during this interview.
Panic Room was also released in 2002 hoped to hear Ebert mention it. Such a great movie. The most underrated movie by Fincher and ever.
It's definitely well done. I think the premise is probably too simple for it to be a truly great movie. But the cinematography is tops.
The Game is his most underrated by far.
Man... Robin Williams was amazing in One Hour Photo
What a man with no ego. . . At the peak of his success. . .he’s the subject. . .of an interview. . .asked about the best movies of the 30 years. . .given a long time to think about it. . .and consider. . .he lists 4 movies that someone else has listed as the top 4 movies. . . . .
I Love these shows Conversations can last hours
3:30 "Goodfellas was the best film of the seventies?" nice one Charlie!
TBP12 he’s not just a pervert, he’s a simpering moron.
TBP12 it would have been the best movie of the 70s if it was released then also
@@randywhite3947 You sure about that? A lot of people consider Taxi Driver a superior Scorsese movie. And the 70s had a lot of good shit man Godfather, Chinatown etc all
Weirdo Reborn
1.And I know many people who feel that Goodfellas is a superior movie to Taxi Driver as well you could go either way really
2. I know man the 70s was a strong Decade for Movies(you could make a case for the 90s being better) with many classics that have shaped the art of cinema as we know it today but I personally feel that Goodfellas is just as good if not better than anything in that Decade
Mark Schultz you sound fun
“Goodfellas was the best movie of the 70s?” Hahahaha
Lol
It was of 90s
ALIEN!!!!!!!!
Come on Charlie!
Hardly Charlie Rose’s biggest blunder.
If Dances w/Wolves was a PC choice they still should have split and given Martin the best director. Costner basically used the John Ford playbook. Finally giving Scorsese the oscar for The Departed was like when they gave Paul Newman for The Color of Money. Consolation prizes to right past wrongs.
And Scorsese only two years after this made what many consider the truest of 'true cinema'....Shark Tale
The best parents. Changed my life.
Excellent interview
Funny that they mentioned _The Hours_ as I just saw the 2022 stage play featured on the PBS NewsHour today.
Brody in The Pianist is great
Adaptation had such a brilliant script
No one talks about Nicolas Cage being a great actor anymore.
maybe probably because he no longer is?
@@juniorgod321 Not with his current movie role choices! How can you take him seriously as an actor when he does, like, 5 crappy movies a year, so he can have plenty of $$$ to spend. And, he's been taking horrible roles since 2011. If it wasn't for his lavish spending, Cage could still be doing 2 movies a year - 1 big blockbuster and 1 Oscar-bait pic.
He's been in mostly arthouse movies and b-movies lately, which don't get much attention. Mandy was great, though. Pig, too.
@@ssssssstssssssss Cage was really good in Pig! I haven't seen Mandy yet. How was his performance?
I laughed when I saw him as Dracula in the preview for Renfield. Did people laugh at George Hamilton when they saw him as that character in _Love at First Bite (1979)?_
Roger put Hoop Dreams and Pulp Fiction higher than Goodfellas on his list of the best films of the 90s.
I miss Roger Ebert.
Surprised at how cruel the comments are regarding Ebert.
if anybody deserves it, he does.
Roger: "He made the best movie of three decades in a row; Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, and Goodfellas.
Charlie: "Goodfellas was best movie of the seventies?"
R: "Of the nineties."
C: "What's the best movie of the eighties?"
R: Raging Bull.
C: "What's the best movie you've seen in the last twenty five years?"
Roger: "Jesus, Charlie, I literally just told you the best movies of the last thirty two years. What are you, on medicine?"
Charlie: ruclips.net/video/eN15cYPQ--s/видео.html
Charlie Rose is overrated
our film culture used to be so sophisticated
We were saying the same in 2002 but yeah i still agree. Movies have gone down the toilet
@@prilljazzatlanta5070 comparing the early-2000's to prior decades to now is comparing apples to oranges to dog turds
@@wolfie71231 That sums it up pretty accurately
"I went to see Jackass, a _shameful_ movie... I laughed all the way through it!" 😂 15:05
Roger had hundreds of favourite films, but these were in his top 20, or the ones he generally considered the greatest.
The General (Buster Keaton)
Sunrise (F.W. Murnau)
Citizen Kane (Orson Welles)
Casablanca (Michael Curtiz)
Notorious (Alfred Hitchcock)
The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre (John Huston)
The Third Man (Carol Reed)
Singin' In The Rain (Gene Kelly, Stanley Donen)
Tokyo Story (Yasujiiro Ozu)
Vertigo (Alfred Hitchcock)
Floating Weeds (Yasujiiro Ozu)
La Dolce Vita (Federico Fellini)
Harakiri (Masaki Kobayashi)
2001 A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick)
Aguirre, The Wrath of God (Werner Herzog)
The Godfather (Francis Ford Coppola)
The Enigma of Kaspar Hausser (Werner Herzog)
Gates Of Heaven (Errol Morris)
Apocalypse Now (Francis Ford Coppola)
Raging Bull (Martin Scorsese)
Hoop Dreams (Steve James)
Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino)
Three Colors: Red (Krzysztof Kieslowski)
The Tree Of Life (Terrence Malick)
What always bothered me about Rose was his unbelievably annoying habit of laughing too early and too often.
and his stupid glib comments and his oily persona and sorry, I don't have 3 hours to devote to all the ways Charlie Rose irritates and annoys me.
His show was only ever as good as his guest. He is a terrible listener, asks vague questions, and constantly tries to assert himself as an intellectual the whole time. I have no idea how he got the clout he did, but I will still watch these old episodes because of the big names he was able to draw. It somehow worked despite his awful persona. The set design makes it special I guess?
Stop exaggeration. He isn't there to coddle anymore
Can somebody make a list of all the movies mentioned for the year ?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/75th_Academy_Awards
That Roman Polanski bit was uncomfortable
I need to give Adaptation another look.
"I think I'm the hero."
Only found this because I couldn't find his original 2002 City of God review. Charlie you failed by not bringing that one up bro
Pulp Fiction & Fanny & Alexander are on my top 2 list
That’s because you are a casual and love cliche movies
@@GeorgeZimmermen Well, Fanny And Alexander is perfect and Pulp Fiction is showing its age but it's certainly a milestone of cinema. Then again, I'm a bit of a hipster myself, I guess.
In retrospect, of course Charlie Rose would be dismissive of the reason for Polanski's exile from the U.S.
haha I was thinking the same thing
Charlie loves little boys too
Roger understates the case against Polanski, too, saying, " ... for having a relationship with a young woman." He seems to be trying to put it politely, but it comes out as something close to a lie.
@@JohnPaul-le4pf
Not really that’s exactly what he did though.... and of course he wants to be polite
@@ruly8153
Statutory rape is statutory rape and calling it a "relationship" is misleading at best; at worst, it serves as a lie.
I like Roger Ebert and I don't have any kind of a case against him, but he came up short this time and allowed himself to appear to be just another apologist for the notorious immorality of Hollywood, especially during that era.
Roger Ebert watched and laughed at Jackass. Wish I was there to see that
Most of the movies he said it would be nominated that year were nominated
2002 was a great year for movies.
Rose cuts his guests off too often lol
Peace Be With You
I love Roger hes a bit buyest for Marty they were close friends buy Marty is amazing
“Biased”. Dumbass
Minority Report he put as the best film of this year.
I bet that he would of loved Ready Player One.
after rotting, it is in hell
@@ThePoreproductions I feel he wouldn't like it
The Apartment
Sunset Blvd.
Ace in the Hole
Witness for the Prosecution
Some Like It Hot
I also liked, Kiss Me, Stupid. Very underappreciated. Ahead of it's time. And Kim Novak! Wow!
billy wilder fan
Witness for the Prosecution. So good, Marlene Dietrich is the bomb!
That's a way to store something without clay.
Ebert was a great writer, not just a great movie critic.
Whoever on the right fits with Assigned-Latin people's playlist.
Why do people hate Roger Ebert?
he was of the opinion that video games aren't art and this angered many people, Osama
Learn baby learn
I don't get it. People don't have to agree with his film criticism, but to 'hate' him and not acknowledge his expertise, reflects poorly on them, I think.
@@masterelmstreet5886 are you well?
I think he s awsome
oh what about brit films off topic i think
So weird knowing how Charlie Rose fell, especially as they discussed some romantic movies with power differentials. Charlie does a good job though I noticed that he interrupted Roger a lot. And Mel Gibson gets a pass from them both who would probably avoid discussing him now.
How would you know…🙄
@@kenfresno1711 That's my guess
@@MelindaGreen fair enough. I’m a fool.
@@kenfresno1711 No you're not. I exaggerated which is usually understood but is always at risk of being challenged. It's the chance I took.
He still has tens of millions.
Cyrano de Bergerac 1990!
Talks about the best movies from the 1970's onward, also talks about directors who always get snubbed at the Oscars
Doesn't mention Stanley Kubrick's name once.
The only films Kubrick made in the 70’s, Barry Lyndon and Clockwork Orange, weren’t very good, compared to a lot of his other work.
@@guyincognito5706 I'm pretty sure A Clockwork Orange is one of his best films.
@@guyincognito5706 barry lyndon is one of his best works lmao
Barry Lyndon is widely regarded as one of his two masterworks with 2001. 🤔
@@andrewhart5547 As a massive Kubrick fan I'm really not a fan of either of his movies of the 70s.
A Beautiful Mime
Jackass amazing he vouched 4 it. Was great
I miss Charlie Rose. Funny how he feigned not knowing what Roman Polanski‘s crimes were. Oh Charlie
well he did things similar to polanski
Yeah not very PC to excuse Polanski in the post Weinstein era now especially. It's tragic his wife was murdered but that does not excuse his own crimes and perversions.
@@kurtanglina7419 pretty serious allegation you got there
@@kurtanglina7419 Charlie Rose was accused of being inappropriate, groping and harassing. Polanski was a pedophile rapist. Big difference.
ADAPTATION FAN CLUB!!!! SPIKE JONZE SO UNDERRATED
2005 was another great year for movies, at least for me.
What were some of your favs that year?
@@ryancalhoun2910 Batman Begins, Narnia, The Island, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, King Kong, Rebound, The Ringer, Star Wars 3, V for Vendetta, 40-Year-Old Virgin, etc... and those are just some of the ones I own from 2005.
Martin scorese driving spirit. and 2002 is cliche for rock track
7:19 - the pnst
Top notch 👌
Notice how quickly Charlie Rose changes the topic after Polanski got brought up
#MeToo paranoia; hang them all without evidence you harpies.
@@RollingOrmond the movement was non existent back then and nobody had accused him back then. He changed the topic out of guilt maybe? I mean what reason could he have? Other than being a creep in his workplace?
Weirdo Reborn He wanted to keep the interview light and not get stuck on a very serious issue. Not a good excuse and I think Charlie can be really bad at interviewing and is apparently a creep. But I’m just saying what his reason likely was in that instance. He had to keep the conversation moving and didn’t want to linger on pedophilia. Especially since this was on Public Broadcast way back I the day.
I hated The Hours.
Lol, 20 years later and we REALLY don't have any privacy anymore!
2002 was a pretty good year but '99, '00 and '01 were all better and not slow years for films by any means Roger.
POTUS people can't deal with my lack of emotional awareness.
2002 was the best year for movies in the Oughts.
Loved 02. Where do you think 07 stands, though?
@@prilljazzatlanta5070 pretty up there! Assassination of Jesse James, to start!
DJ Crew
Actually Blackboard Jungle (1955) was the first movie to use a rock song - Rock Around The Clock - not Scorsese.
That's not what Ebert meant. The Girl Can't Help It was full of rock and roll. Scorsese was the first to use rock and roll the way other directors used orchestral soundtracks. Music the characters can't hear but we the audience hears. And he used not one song in the title, but many throughout .
Rockfish ***THIS***
@@Jantonov1 then the first movie to use it that way would be Easy Rider
@@Jantonov1 The characters in Blackboard Jungle couldn't hear Rock Around The Clock, just the audience.
It's really hard to watch these Charlie Rose interviews now that we know what he's really like. Honestly, I thought he should have been fired long before the me too stuff came out, because he sucked as an interviewer. A lot of the time it was clear he did no prep work.
Disagree. He was a great interviewer.
It's fine to have males compete for whatever.
Creepy Rose trying to downplay Polanski’s disgusting crime. Why am I not surprised
I want Kdramas associated with Iranians.
The Minority Blurts
Charlie Rose not being familiar with why Roman Polanski can't come to the US. How surprising...
13:43 Funny thing is, no Harry Potter was made in 2003!
The first movie released in 2001
Kinda disturbing how they casually alluded to polanski's crimes like it was no big deal.
maybe i should watch raging bull
Great film, but be patient it’s slow and different from the style of today.
@@moviola12 enjoyed it deeply but lost interest towards the middle and end... my first thoughts was this was so much superior and realistic than rocky... but as an overall film i liked rocky more
now for the record i didnt like taxi driver until it grew on me eventually so 2nd rewatch will be different
Nice that he mentioned Pulp Fiction as one of the best films ever maded!
Easy prey.
I'd heard Ebert say before that Scorsese made the film of three decades with _Taxi Driver (1976), Raging Bull (1980) and Goodfellas(1990)._ But I think George Lucas made the film of a generation: _Star Wars_ and the best sequel of all time (at least until _Avengers: Endgame), The Empire Strikes Back._
I miss Charlie Rose.
Charlie Rose was too pretentious and loved to hear himself talk too much to be a really good interviewer. Not surprised what happened to him. Roger Ebert, on the other hand, went from being, the first year of Siskel and Ebert, an awkward guy in front of the camera, to being one of the best, most engaging film critics ever.
Not even close. He was a fantastic interviewer, personality quirks and all, and dominated that space in American culture for decades. None of which had anything to do with his sexual misconduct.
@@Heraclitean I watched a fair amount of Rose. I routinely found myself screaming at the TV, “shut the freak up and let him talk!!!” Can’t think of anyone else like that. If you could review his interviews with a stopwatch, I’m certain that many interviews he would have spoken more than his guest.
@@Nicksonian Yet he was revered, beloved, and public figures craved to be on his show. Maybe because he did compelling interviews despite the interrupting, and even the interrupting came out of his enthusiasm and engagement. Not such a mystery.
@@Heraclitean Yet… Even before the flood of evidence that painted Rose as a sexual predator, I found him pompous and arrogant. Not surprising then that a number of young women found him to be exactly that, off camera and behind closed doors.