He is an ex-hindu atheist. Atheist are hiding behind the fancy word to justify they are truth. like be rational , walk alone, humanists, Science seeker & X etc 😂
a pakistani athiest awais iqbal challenged qaiser ahmad raja on creation vs evolution. and after that day there is not a single evolutionist with confidence yapping abut evolution
Saboor believed in creation before he studied evolution and after studying it he still don't believe in it , only reason he studied it is to prove it wrong so he was dishonest from the start just like Pakistani block
Just believe in allah he Will feed you leave all the facilities that created by science and go with your family to live in forest or mountain which is created by your god 😂
Bro, I went with him on his Instagram live and I gave him logical argument for God first wasthe Quranic argument that universe cannot come from nothing. It cannot create itself. It cannot come from something else created so therefore it must be God and I gave him the dependency argument, but he denied logic saying that logic is limited due to our limited observations and that there could be a squared circle and 2+2 = 5 and the irony is that the name of his account is be “rational “.
that is just absolute trash stupid 1st of all rational literally comes from the Greek word ratio which means thinking while avoiding CONTRADICTION what he is doing is basically ignorance and composite fallacy which is basically that if science can change that means logic can change 💀🤦♂️ go tell him that without all this he wouldn't have Darwinian evolution which is basically deductive + a current theory that might change and science too also tell him that how logical thinking works because he is mixing science and logic
I subbed you, because I'm with you, ever encounter him again then have this argument like this: 1:every thing in the universe is dependent upon each other, hence can't explain its own existence also the chain of dependencies cannot go on infinitely; there must be a necessary, independent being (God) who is the source of all existence 2:Something which begans (has a beginning) to exist cannot has a cause of nothing, or itself rather the cause must be God, a necessary being 3:if logic is limited due to our limited observation and if it is really unreliable how can you trust your reasoning that led you to atheism? and since both logic and observation are invalid then every rational system like Mathematics or science should collapse? 4: so if logic is unreliable, their claim that "logic is limited" is itself illogical and cannot be trusted, making them cut their own branches off where they are sitting on... 5:idk about other possible realities but in this reality calling out a squared circle itself goes against the law of non-contradiction, its like existence of unicorns, flying pigs, and logically consistent atheism, lol 6:ask him that if he admit the possibility of things beyond his understanding, why exclude the possibility of God? He would crash his mind or maybe just quit being a hypocrite these are basically radical skepticism, which denies the reliability of human logic and reasoning altogether, look brother If the atheist chose to reject logic itself, that’s not a failure of the argument it’s a refusal to engage in meaningful reasoning, which reflects more on the atheist’s inconsistency than on the validity of the arguments for God, Assalam walaikum, Allah ki rehmat se Duniya me nahi to Jannat me milenge
Alhamdulillah, i didn't knew that you could speak Urdu, I've always seen you speaking in English. there are a lot of so called Ex Muslims raising in India and it's nice to see at least someone with a brain and reach replying to them
Actually no, those so called ex-muslims are completely fake. 2 reasons 1. They make that profile to deceive the ummah and encourage them to disassociate with their muslim identity. They were never muslim to begin with. 2. Even if the person really WAS a “muslim”, they STILL wasnt a muslim because no man or woman can leave islam if they truly understand it. And if they didn’t understand it they didn’t believe in it, and you cannot disbelieve in something that you never believed in.
if you wanna tackle them start listening to dr mufti yasir nadeem al wajdi, awaz e haq uncensored, qaiser ahmad raja. also if you are interested interested in evolution listen to creation vs evolution debate by qaiser ahmad raja and awais iqbal
They are not ex muslims, it is just a propaganda by hindu organization to spread fitna amongst muslims living in India, and if someone really left Islam, he/she was never understood islam and knew Allah on first hand , had they knew, they would rather get beheaded than leaving islam.
After u r ABUJAAN soc king off many mghol they finally accepted you in puss 😺 IAM. 😂😂 Ik you are proud of u r ABUJAAN achievement. A jam will be a jam forever.❤❤
@@Bharatiyamulnivasikumbhar420 if ram and Krishna is a pdofly then put them in your backyard. They will look good together with your r 🌲 pe a dickt pdofly momo.
@@crazydrax5059 bro its an attempt of Indian far right hindutva boys who Catch young muslim women in their Love - hence the word "Love trap" And then they leak their private vids or pics doing zina and things like that to publicly shame them or force them to marry and leave islam. That is what this terms means
Alot of indian muslim girls are getting into haram relationships (gf bf, adultery , marriage etc.) With hindu guys in India. That is what is meant by that term that muslims use - implying that they catch our women in traps
Alot of indian muslim girls are getting into haram relationships (gf bf, adultery , marriage etc.) With hindu guys in India. That is what is meant by that term that muslims use - implying that they catch our women in traps
1. Fossil Gaps and Missing Links: While many transitional fossils have been found, there are still gaps in the fossil record, particularly when it comes to the intermediate forms between species. Critics often point out the absence of clear "missing links" that definitively show the gradual transition from one species to another, especially between species like Homo sapiens and earlier hominids like Australopithecus or Homo habilis. For example, despite claims of human-like ancestors, there is no direct, continuous fossil evidence showing a seamless progression of human evolution. 2. Sudden Appearance of Complex Traits: The theory of evolution suggests that small changes accumulate over time, leading to the development of complex traits. However, the sudden appearance of complex traits in humans, such as advanced cognitive abilities, language, and consciousness, is difficult to explain through gradual changes alone. Critics argue that such complex developments could not have emerged solely through random mutations and natural selection, and might require a different explanation. 3. Irreducible Complexity: Some critics of evolution argue that certain biological systems are "irreducibly complex", meaning they could not function unless all parts were present at once. For example, the complexity of the human eye or the human brain is sometimes cited as evidence that such systems could not have evolved through gradual, step-by-step processes, as they would have been non-functional at earlier stages of development. 4. Human DNA and the Gap with Primates: While humans share a significant portion of their DNA with great apes, such as chimpanzees, critics of evolution point out that the genetic gap between humans and chimpanzees is still significant. Some argue that the differences in cognitive abilities, behavior, and physical characteristics between humans and other primates are too vast to be explained by gradual evolutionary changes. The genetic similarity between humans and primates could be interpreted as evidence of a common designer or divine creation, rather than evolutionary descent. 5. Human Uniqueness: Humans exhibit unique characteristics, such as advanced problem-solving, abstract thought, art, and culture, which critics argue are not easily explained through evolutionary mechanisms. The "leap" from basic tool use to advanced social structures and creativity might seem too sudden for gradual evolution to account for. The development of consciousness, self-awareness, and moral reasoning in humans is often seen as a key differentiator from other animals and could be considered evidence against a purely naturalistic evolutionary explanation. 6. Rapid Evolutionary Changes: Some evolutionary theorists suggest that species can evolve relatively rapidly in response to environmental pressures, but critics point to rapid leaps in human development, such as the sudden emergence of Homo sapiens, and argue that such jumps in evolution cannot be explained by slow, gradual change alone. The timing of the appearance of anatomically modern humans-with advanced cultural and technological capabilities-could suggest a need for a different explanation outside the framework of gradual evolution. 7. Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design: Some believe that the theory of evolution may not explain everything about human origins, and that intelligent design (the idea that life was designed by a higher intelligence) could be a plausible alternative. Advocates of intelligent design argue that certain aspects of human biology and behavior show signs of design, which evolution alone cannot adequately explain. The argument for theistic evolution suggests that God could have used evolutionary processes as a tool for creating life, but this still raises questions about how much of the evolutionary process was guided or predetermined. 8. Anthropological and Cultural Evidence: Some anthropologists argue that human beings' distinct cultural and spiritual aspects-such as religious beliefs, language, art, and abstract thinking-cannot be solely explained by biological evolution. Critics claim that these aspects of human experience may suggest a deeper purposeful creation beyond purely materialistic processes. 9. Complexity of Human Evolutionary Path: The human evolutionary lineage is more complex than a simple linear progression. Various hominid species (e.g., Neanderthals, Denisovans) coexisted at different points in time, complicating the story of human evolution. Critics argue that the simultaneous existence of multiple human-like species calls into question the simplicity of the theory of gradual human evolution. 10. Alternative Theories of Human Origin: There are several alternative theories regarding the origin of humans that challenge the traditional view of gradual evolution. For example, some propose the idea of a divine creation or intervention that directly shaped humanity’s emergence. The idea of parallel evolution or convergent evolution suggests that similar traits and characteristics could emerge independently, rather than through a single evolutionary path.
1. there's like a dozen species b/w Australopithicenes and homo sapiens what world are u living in 2. they're not difficult to explain , they have been explained for decades just read a paper. and what critics lol random creationists aren't ' critics ' they should be in the same category is flat earthers 3. all irreducibly complex structures proposed by behe and friends were debunked , and actual irreducibly complex structures have been shown to arise in multiple experiments. 4. baseless assertion again. ' some argue that ' by some u mean yourself. 5. no its not lol. these are just assertions there is no argument 6. humans did not emerge suddenly stop lying also yes evolutionary theory permits geologically rapid cases of evolution how's that an issue ? 7. this is again a baseless assertion 8. no one argues that , culture exists in other great apes too 9. who are these critics lmao no one has ever argued that human evolution is linear , no evolution is linear 10. just because some people think god created humans using magic doesn't invalidate the theory. if u want to critique the theory explain how endogenous retroviruses could infect thousands of loci all orthologous in both chimps and humans , or explain why pseudogenes for embryonic pluripotency are doing in corresponding genomic loci b/w humans and other apes.
9:48 Tailbone meantion in hadees 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “There are forty days between the two blows.” They said, “O Abu Hurairah, forty days.” He said, “No.” They said, “Forty.” A month. He said, “I did not.” They said, “Forty years.” He said, “I did not.” Then God sends down water from the sky, and they sprout as plants sprout. He said, “But not from man.” Nothing will wear out except one bone, which is the tailbone, and from it creation will be assembled on the Day of Resurrection. Sahih Muslim 7414
Adam was first human created by God in heaven, and eye created from Adam, it mean many human created in heaven,we not falling on earth from heaven,but we taking birth,so what do you think ,how Adam reached on earth?
Existence of Adam and hawwa is a secondary debate. Primary issue is that whether this universe came into existence from nothing? Or there is a creator behind it. And talking about "fact", anything that began to exist must have a creator because otherwise you would stuck into an infinite regress, which is fallacy.
Asslam alykum Brother zeeshan that Indian youtuber made the video for his indian viewers who only have couple of brain celles working but not for someone of your calibre. Take care ❤👍
Allah SWT ke 99 names h !!! Un mein ek ye👇 bhi h *95. Al-Badi (البديع)* To iska kya matlab h ? Pata h? Nahi pata hoga ! Main kis liye hu ?! *Al-Badi' (البديع)* : 1. The Originator 2. The Creator 3. The Innovator 4. The Producer 5. *THE EVOLVER* 6. The Incomparable 7. The Unique 🏴🏳️
@@hassaanwaheed-t9jEvolution occurs through the process of natural selection, where small, gradual changes accumulate over time, leading to the adaptation of species. These changes often arise from genetic mutations, which can affect an organism's traits.
If you ask me which is easier to believe 1: my long long long ancestor was a dumb blind fish or a monkey hanging on tree by its tail 2 there’s a creator a god who created me and everything around me. I find the 2nd one easier to believe
First of all just because atheism is rooted in empiricism rather than faith does not mean that an atheist who believes in naturalism is “rational” i mean who decided that the tag for “rationality” in just rooted in observation
4:25 science yakin nahi karta kyuki koi bhi proof hain nahi... science us chij ko accept jrur krega jiska koi proof ho..tum proof de do accept kr lenge
While the theory of evolution is widely accepted by scientists as the best explanation for the development of life, including humans, there are still some scientific aspects that suggest the process may not be fully understood or the only possible explanation. Here are a few reasons why it is not considered a 100% certainty that humans evolved entirely by themselves: 1. Gaps in the Fossil Record: Although there is substantial fossil evidence supporting the theory of evolution, there are still gaps in the fossil record, especially regarding the intermediate forms between species. The "missing links" between major evolutionary stages, such as the transition from apes to humans, are not always clear. While many fossils show gradual changes, the full sequence of these transitions remains incomplete. 2. Complexity of Human Evolution: The evolution of human beings is highly complex and involves multiple factors such as genetics, environmental pressures, and random mutations. Some scientists argue that the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species involves more than just gradual evolutionary changes and might include rare or sudden events (like genetic bottlenecks or environmental catastrophes) that are difficult to predict or explain with certainty. 3. The Role of Genetic Mutations: While genetic mutations are a driving force behind evolution, the process is not always entirely predictable. Some mutations are beneficial, others harmful, and many are neutral. The randomness of mutations and their effects on an organism's survival can complicate the process, making the exact pathway of evolution difficult to trace. 4. The Anthropic Principle: Some scientists argue that the development of intelligent life (such as humans) may be extremely rare or even unique in the universe. The anthropic principle suggests that certain conditions in the universe may be so finely tuned for life to evolve in specific ways that it's unlikely for it to occur elsewhere, or for humans to evolve in precisely the way they did without a series of improbable events. 5. Alternative Hypotheses: While evolution via natural selection is widely accepted, there are alternative theories, such as the idea of "intelligent design" or the possibility of extraterrestrial influences on human development. Although these ideas are not generally accepted in the scientific mainstream, they provide other perspectives on how life, including human life, could have originated. 6. Sudden Development of Complex Traits: Some traits in human beings, such as advanced language, reasoning abilities, and consciousness, appear relatively suddenly in the evolutionary timeline. The rapid development of these traits raises questions about whether they can be fully explained through gradual evolution or if other factors (such as environmental or social pressures) played a significant role. While there is strong evidence for the theory of evolution, particularly through genetic, fossil, and comparative anatomy studies, these and other uncertainties mean that science does not yet claim 100% certainty about every aspect of the process, especially when it comes to the complex evolution of humans.
Question: Kia koi dosra specie he jo apny apko cover krny k liye clothing krta ho? Khana paka kr with different mechanism khata ho? Different languages bol skta ho?
@@itsanis3798 aap evolution theory ko apne religion (atheism) ki wajah se hi mante hai na?? Kyu ki aap ke relegion ke anusar to jo cheeze 5 senses se nahi dekhi ja sakti un ka astitva hi nahi hai, to fir theory of evolution kaha 5 senses me aati hai????
Question; Konsa dosra specie itna zaheen he jis ne ships, aeroplane, space ships, computer, AI, quantum mechanics or quantum computing, etc cheezein ijad ki hun?
@@mdjakaria4187 Your stupidity is being watched by the god you worship. Isn't it Allah who said seeking knowledge is important? And by that he did not meant knowledge of Islam alone, he meant every form of it. "Read" is the first word of quran.
Monkey and human share same ansestor. Do some research kid . You will find many organ in your body that are useless in human like apendix,tailbone ,earbone ect
@@inamdurrani9259 didn't he condemned Indian Hindus when they played music infront of mosque? Now this Bangladeshi Muslims killing hindus in Bangladesh so why he doesn't talk about his so called muslim brothers?
Inka hisaab se ek cell bna phir vahi fish bani phir vo fish crocodile 🐊 bana phir snake bna phir monkey 🐒🐒🐵🐵🐵 bna phir ye jo abhi h vo monkey se insaan banne ki koshish kr rha h
1. Science doesn't necessarily require repeatability. Conclusions can also be made through inference of data. As an example, when a robber commits a crime and runs away, the police don't see the crime actively happening in front of them. Yet they can infer what happened. Same is the case with genetic testing which used to figure out who the father of a particular person is, in court. We don't see him physically begetting his son, yet we infer it. 2. No it's not true that we infer evolution just by looking at bones (I think you meant to say fossils, which doesn't necessarily have to be bones). Darwin saw that within individual genuses of animals, the different species sometime tend to display characteristics of other species within the same genus, in rare cases. This was difficult to explain under special creation but easy to explain under the idea that they share ancestory, especially given the fact that they always show a particular pattern in terms of biographical distribution and the reversion to previous characteristics were also present under the cases of artificial selection. 3. If people start saying tomorrow that heliocentric theory proves God doesn't exist, that doesn't mean heliocentric theory is false. Many philosophers and scientists have pointed out the simple mindedness of Dawkins when he says evolution proves God doesn't exist. Even his book the God delusion contains many philosphical errors. That still doesn't mean evolution is false. 4. It's completely false that you can't speak against darwin in america. Many well-funded and influential young earth and old earth creationist organizations exist in America. There is even a museum promoting young earth creationism. 40 percent of the population beleive God created humans in their present form less than ten thousand years ago. 5. It is undeniable that some jews, christians and muslims hate the theory of evolution. I don't understand how that is a strawman. 5. Evolution like every other scientific theory and inference mechanism, is based in assumptions, however they are not unrealistic assumptions. All its assumptions are pretty realistic. Without realistic assumptions, we can't do many things in life. 6. Methodological naturalism is very important in trying to figure out stuff. It simply means we will try to understand the unknown by assuming there was not any miraculous intervention. Not hard to grasp when you think about it. And also macroevolution has been so perfectly been shown to be true in all the decades with new discoveries such as shared pseudogenes, hox genes, jumping genes, endogenous retroviruses, chromosomal fusions, chromosomal inversions in closely related species ,beyond all reasonable doubt that it is extremely absurd to say in today's time that it is based on this or that assumption. 7. Some people before darwin did used to beleive in some sort of evolution, but darwin was indeed the first person to show that all life on earth is related via common ancestory. It is not true that he discovered only natural selection. 8. Fossil evidence shows that cambrian explosion didn't happen in the small time creationists say it did. Watch the video " exposing discovery institute part 2 by " Professor dave explains" to learn more. 9. When scientists dispute neo-Darwinism, they don't mean that macroevolution or common descent itself isn't true. They mean that new mechanisms of evolution have been discovered so our current model of evolution should be renamed.
1. Fossil Gaps and Missing Links: While many transitional fossils have been found, there are still gaps in the fossil record, particularly when it comes to the intermediate forms between species. Critics often point out the absence of clear "missing links" that definitively show the gradual transition from one species to another, especially between species like Homo sapiens and earlier hominids like Australopithecus or Homo habilis. For example, despite claims of human-like ancestors, there is no direct, continuous fossil evidence showing a seamless progression of human evolution. 2. Sudden Appearance of Complex Traits: The theory of evolution suggests that small changes accumulate over time, leading to the development of complex traits. However, the sudden appearance of complex traits in humans, such as advanced cognitive abilities, language, and consciousness, is difficult to explain through gradual changes alone. Critics argue that such complex developments could not have emerged solely through random mutations and natural selection, and might require a different explanation. 3. Irreducible Complexity: Some critics of evolution argue that certain biological systems are "irreducibly complex", meaning they could not function unless all parts were present at once. For example, the complexity of the human eye or the human brain is sometimes cited as evidence that such systems could not have evolved through gradual, step-by-step processes, as they would have been non-functional at earlier stages of development. 4. Human DNA and the Gap with Primates: While humans share a significant portion of their DNA with great apes, such as chimpanzees, critics of evolution point out that the genetic gap between humans and chimpanzees is still significant. Some argue that the differences in cognitive abilities, behavior, and physical characteristics between humans and other primates are too vast to be explained by gradual evolutionary changes. The genetic similarity between humans and primates could be interpreted as evidence of a common designer or divine creation, rather than evolutionary descent. 5. Human Uniqueness: Humans exhibit unique characteristics, such as advanced problem-solving, abstract thought, art, and culture, which critics argue are not easily explained through evolutionary mechanisms. The "leap" from basic tool use to advanced social structures and creativity might seem too sudden for gradual evolution to account for. The development of consciousness, self-awareness, and moral reasoning in humans is often seen as a key differentiator from other animals and could be considered evidence against a purely naturalistic evolutionary explanation. 6. Rapid Evolutionary Changes: Some evolutionary theorists suggest that species can evolve relatively rapidly in response to environmental pressures, but critics point to rapid leaps in human development, such as the sudden emergence of Homo sapiens, and argue that such jumps in evolution cannot be explained by slow, gradual change alone. The timing of the appearance of anatomically modern humans-with advanced cultural and technological capabilities-could suggest a need for a different explanation outside the framework of gradual evolution. 7. Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design: Some believe that the theory of evolution may not explain everything about human origins, and that intelligent design (the idea that life was designed by a higher intelligence) could be a plausible alternative. Advocates of intelligent design argue that certain aspects of human biology and behavior show signs of design, which evolution alone cannot adequately explain. The argument for theistic evolution suggests that God could have used evolutionary processes as a tool for creating life, but this still raises questions about how much of the evolutionary process was guided or predetermined. 8. Anthropological and Cultural Evidence: Some anthropologists argue that human beings' distinct cultural and spiritual aspects-such as religious beliefs, language, art, and abstract thinking-cannot be solely explained by biological evolution. Critics claim that these aspects of human experience may suggest a deeper purposeful creation beyond purely materialistic processes. 9. Complexity of Human Evolutionary Path: The human evolutionary lineage is more complex than a simple linear progression. Various hominid species (e.g., Neanderthals, Denisovans) coexisted at different points in time, complicating the story of human evolution. Critics argue that the simultaneous existence of multiple human-like species calls into question the simplicity of the theory of gradual human evolution. 10. Alternative Theories of Human Origin: There are several alternative theories regarding the origin of humans that challenge the traditional view of gradual evolution. For example, some propose the idea of a divine creation or intervention that directly shaped humanity’s emergence. The idea of parallel evolution or convergent evolution suggests that similar traits and characteristics could emerge independently, rather than through a single evolutionary path.
veru good point to point demolition of stupid arguement zishan bhai, however, my hunch is, this guys often exposes hindutva paradigms and thwir irrational beliefs, and this is done by him to show that he is neutral, because darwinism is easiest theory to dismantle
Macro we cannot observe qki life cycle badi hoti h. Isiliy it is not possible for use to observe macro. But it doesnt mean macro evolution hota nai. Indus is not hindu as u said.
@@fahimmuntasir7038 No, scientific theories are not absolute truths: Explanation Scientific theories are based on evidence and are considered to be true, but they are not absolutely certain. Theories can be disproven by future experiments or evidence. - By Google That's what STJ also said in this video. Saying that we should blindly follow a Theory only because it's a Scientific makes no sense and they say that "We are Rational"
@Billioncompany786 Scientific theory aren’t meant to be absolute truth...Not just scientific theories but scientific facts aren’t absolute truth.. That's why science works bruh... But a scientific theory is simply the best explanation for any natural phenomena...We threw everything at it,we challenged it every way possible but it still rose to the occasion..That's why it's the highest honour... Scientific theory changes or improves overtime...Just like darwin's theory of evolution is not really a thing but we improved and added a lot more information to it And made "modern synthesis of evolution".. which explains the process better as darwin's theory had some flaws... Even Einstein's general theory of relativity doesn’t work in certain scale..But it is able to explain most of the events or things in our universe..So that's how science works..We improve it overtime with more observation and understanding...It isn't hypothesis it's the best explanation we have got in our hand... By me- Also science itself doesn't believe in its theory blindly lol... The concept of blind faith isn’t there in science... Science doesn’t claim to provide you with absolute truth and that's why it's the most trustworthy resource known to us...If another resource helps you better grasp the universe then good for you mate..
@@Billioncompany786 evolution is as fact as earth being round, if you want to say evolution gonna be debunked in future it's like saying science will prove earth to be flat😂 sorry baradar world doesn't revolves around your fairytales
He is an ex-hindu atheist. Atheist are hiding behind the fancy word to justify they are truth. like be rational , walk alone, humanists, Science seeker & X etc 😂
🤣🤣
a pakistani athiest awais iqbal challenged qaiser ahmad raja on creation vs evolution. and after that day there is not a single evolutionist with confidence yapping abut evolution
Bro does the muslim debater win, Does he replied with scientific evidences plz tell me
Brother Suboor Ahmed can eat so called Athiest defending Evolution.😂
Saboor believed in creation before he studied evolution and after studying it he still don't believe in it , only reason he studied it is to prove it wrong so he was dishonest from the start just like Pakistani block
Just believe in allah he
Will feed you leave all the facilities that created by science and go with your family to live in forest or mountain which is created by your god 😂
@@Ropas365 they love all kafir science and technology but call evolution stupid when it goes against there faith
@@Ropas365 and you eat gobar and worship varaha pigs and lingam and yoni in guddimallam temple and kamakhaya temple that's gud science.
Olagayber and pdofly momo without apuss, b lastme law and aI take iya:🤡🤡 hello saar plzzz con wort saar. We are most b reading of all time saar.
Shukran Habibi love from Canada 🇨🇦 keep exposing Hinduism Cult ❤
Hell nah why are u guys so hypocrite your religion Islam is the true definition of cult 🤡
No need to expose anything
Only one religion is true
Islam
We need to promote and prove this only
Bro, I went with him on his Instagram live and I gave him logical argument for God first wasthe Quranic argument that universe cannot come from nothing. It cannot create itself. It cannot come from something else created so therefore it must be God and I gave him the dependency argument, but he denied logic saying that logic is limited due to our limited observations and that there could be a squared circle and 2+2 = 5 and the irony is that the name of his account is be “rational “.
that is just absolute trash stupid 1st of all rational literally comes from the Greek word ratio which means thinking while avoiding CONTRADICTION what he is doing is basically ignorance and composite fallacy which is basically that if science can change that means logic can change 💀🤦♂️ go tell him that without all this he wouldn't have Darwinian evolution which is basically deductive + a current theory that might change and science too also tell him that how logical thinking works because he is mixing science and logic
I subbed you, because I'm with you, ever encounter him again then have this argument like this:
1:every thing in the universe is dependent upon each other, hence can't explain its own existence also the chain of dependencies cannot go on infinitely; there must be a necessary, independent being (God) who is the source of all existence
2:Something which begans (has a beginning) to exist cannot has a cause of nothing, or itself rather the cause must be God, a necessary being
3:if logic is limited due to our limited observation and if it is really unreliable how can you trust your reasoning that led you to atheism? and since both logic and observation are invalid then every rational system like Mathematics or science should collapse?
4: so if logic is unreliable, their claim that "logic is limited" is itself illogical and cannot be trusted, making them cut their own branches off where they are sitting on...
5:idk about other possible realities but in this reality calling out a squared circle itself goes against the law of non-contradiction, its like existence of unicorns, flying pigs, and logically consistent atheism, lol
6:ask him that if he admit the possibility of things beyond his understanding, why exclude the possibility of God? He would crash his mind or maybe just quit being a hypocrite
these are basically radical skepticism, which denies the reliability of human logic and reasoning altogether, look brother If the atheist chose to reject logic itself, that’s not a failure of the argument it’s a refusal to engage in meaningful reasoning, which reflects more on the atheist’s inconsistency than on the validity of the arguments for God,
Assalam walaikum, Allah ki rehmat se Duniya me nahi to Jannat me milenge
Well then he might be a secret Christian because they believe 1+1+1=1 😂
@@M_Liesl Ma sha allah bhai thanks for sharing
@@mdjakaria4187 English ka E bhi ata hai?
Alhamdulillah, i didn't knew that you could speak Urdu, I've always seen you speaking in English. there are a lot of so called Ex Muslims raising in India and it's nice to see at least someone with a brain and reach replying to them
Actually no, those so called ex-muslims are completely fake. 2 reasons
1. They make that profile to deceive the ummah and encourage them to disassociate with their muslim identity. They were never muslim to begin with.
2. Even if the person really WAS a “muslim”, they STILL wasnt a muslim because no man or woman can leave islam if they truly understand it. And if they didn’t understand it they didn’t believe in it, and you cannot disbelieve in something that you never believed in.
if you wanna tackle them start listening to dr mufti yasir nadeem al wajdi, awaz e haq uncensored, qaiser ahmad raja. also if you are interested interested in evolution listen to creation vs evolution debate by qaiser ahmad raja and awais iqbal
@@RahimTariq-nd4qkYou Forget Islamic Awakening
They are h muchlim
Watch mufti Yasir nadeem al wajidi
Qaisar ahmad raza.
Awaz e haq uncensored
They are not ex muslims, it is just a propaganda by hindu organization to spread fitna amongst muslims living in India, and if someone really left Islam, he/she was never understood islam and knew Allah on first hand , had they knew, they would rather get beheaded than leaving islam.
Bs jisko famous hona hota h wo islam ko target krta h...
Masha Allah brother. Finally someone addressed this guy's lies. And the best did it. 😍
My beloved brother remembered he has a urdu channel🎉
Exactly 😢😂
Bahut Khoob ( Zeeshan❤Bhai ) 👌👌...🤣🤣😂😂
@@Ex-Sanatani_SadiqMalik hazrat aap yaha bhi.
Olagayber and pdofly momo without apuss, b lastme law and aI take iya:🤡🤡 hello saar plzzz con wort saar. We are most b reading of all time saar.
@XeJe99 o jahil did you watch video??? Or do you say that Krishna and Ram was pdf file because I can give you refrence from the scriptures about it.
After u r ABUJAAN soc king off many mghol they finally accepted you in puss 😺 IAM. 😂😂 Ik you are proud of u r ABUJAAN achievement. A jam will be a jam forever.❤❤
@@Bharatiyamulnivasikumbhar420 if ram and Krishna is a pdofly then put them in your backyard. They will look good together with your r 🌲 pe
a dickt pdofly momo.
Love From Khalisthan 😍
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Bhai ap Canada sa ho.
Love you bruh 🇨🇦
@@kalsaofpunjab love from Kashmir iok
@@2khongajaldiinshallah-dw7kf Khalisthan
Love you and your responses brother! We need more of these as we have many atheists in India.
10:36 excellent point brother ❤
Assalamualaikum
Welcome back Zeeshan Bhai on this channel
Wa Alaikumassalam Wa Rahmatullah
Walekum Salaam ❤🇨🇦
MashaAllah ❤❤❤ love from Odisha India
Thank you Sir ❤ lots of doubts and waswasayat is clear alhamdulillah may Allah protect us from this world fitnah
Zeeshan, you're doing great! Keep it up.
Nice explanation brother assalamualaikum may Allah guide us all !!
Masha Allah Zabardast Zeeshan bhai ❤❤❤❤
"Stop Bhagwa love trap" wdym by that?
@@crazydrax5059 bro its an attempt of Indian far right hindutva boys who Catch young muslim women in their Love - hence the word "Love trap" And then they leak their private vids or pics doing zina and things like that to publicly shame them or force them to marry and leave islam. That is what this terms means
Alot of indian muslim girls are getting into haram relationships (gf bf, adultery , marriage etc.) With hindu guys in India. That is what is meant by that term that muslims use - implying that they catch our women in traps
Alot of indian muslim girls are getting into haram relationships (gf bf, adultery , marriage etc.) With hindu guys in India. That is what is meant by that term that muslims use - implying that they catch our women in traps
@@crazydrax5059i just explained that bro - you aren't from india..?
1. Fossil Gaps and Missing Links:
While many transitional fossils have been found, there are still gaps in the fossil record, particularly when it comes to the intermediate forms between species. Critics often point out the absence of clear "missing links" that definitively show the gradual transition from one species to another, especially between species like Homo sapiens and earlier hominids like Australopithecus or Homo habilis.
For example, despite claims of human-like ancestors, there is no direct, continuous fossil evidence showing a seamless progression of human evolution.
2. Sudden Appearance of Complex Traits:
The theory of evolution suggests that small changes accumulate over time, leading to the development of complex traits. However, the sudden appearance of complex traits in humans, such as advanced cognitive abilities, language, and consciousness, is difficult to explain through gradual changes alone. Critics argue that such complex developments could not have emerged solely through random mutations and natural selection, and might require a different explanation.
3. Irreducible Complexity:
Some critics of evolution argue that certain biological systems are "irreducibly complex", meaning they could not function unless all parts were present at once. For example, the complexity of the human eye or the human brain is sometimes cited as evidence that such systems could not have evolved through gradual, step-by-step processes, as they would have been non-functional at earlier stages of development.
4. Human DNA and the Gap with Primates:
While humans share a significant portion of their DNA with great apes, such as chimpanzees, critics of evolution point out that the genetic gap between humans and chimpanzees is still significant. Some argue that the differences in cognitive abilities, behavior, and physical characteristics between humans and other primates are too vast to be explained by gradual evolutionary changes.
The genetic similarity between humans and primates could be interpreted as evidence of a common designer or divine creation, rather than evolutionary descent.
5. Human Uniqueness:
Humans exhibit unique characteristics, such as advanced problem-solving, abstract thought, art, and culture, which critics argue are not easily explained through evolutionary mechanisms. The "leap" from basic tool use to advanced social structures and creativity might seem too sudden for gradual evolution to account for.
The development of consciousness, self-awareness, and moral reasoning in humans is often seen as a key differentiator from other animals and could be considered evidence against a purely naturalistic evolutionary explanation.
6. Rapid Evolutionary Changes:
Some evolutionary theorists suggest that species can evolve relatively rapidly in response to environmental pressures, but critics point to rapid leaps in human development, such as the sudden emergence of Homo sapiens, and argue that such jumps in evolution cannot be explained by slow, gradual change alone.
The timing of the appearance of anatomically modern humans-with advanced cultural and technological capabilities-could suggest a need for a different explanation outside the framework of gradual evolution.
7. Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design:
Some believe that the theory of evolution may not explain everything about human origins, and that intelligent design (the idea that life was designed by a higher intelligence) could be a plausible alternative. Advocates of intelligent design argue that certain aspects of human biology and behavior show signs of design, which evolution alone cannot adequately explain.
The argument for theistic evolution suggests that God could have used evolutionary processes as a tool for creating life, but this still raises questions about how much of the evolutionary process was guided or predetermined.
8. Anthropological and Cultural Evidence:
Some anthropologists argue that human beings' distinct cultural and spiritual aspects-such as religious beliefs, language, art, and abstract thinking-cannot be solely explained by biological evolution. Critics claim that these aspects of human experience may suggest a deeper purposeful creation beyond purely materialistic processes.
9. Complexity of Human Evolutionary Path:
The human evolutionary lineage is more complex than a simple linear progression. Various hominid species (e.g., Neanderthals, Denisovans) coexisted at different points in time, complicating the story of human evolution. Critics argue that the simultaneous existence of multiple human-like species calls into question the simplicity of the theory of gradual human evolution.
10. Alternative Theories of Human Origin:
There are several alternative theories regarding the origin of humans that challenge the traditional view of gradual evolution. For example, some propose the idea of a divine creation or intervention that directly shaped humanity’s emergence. The idea of parallel evolution or convergent evolution suggests that similar traits and characteristics could emerge independently, rather than through a single evolutionary path.
1. there's like a dozen species b/w Australopithicenes and homo sapiens what world are u living in
2. they're not difficult to explain , they have been explained for decades just read a paper. and what critics lol random creationists aren't ' critics ' they should be in the same category is flat earthers
3. all irreducibly complex structures proposed by behe and friends were debunked , and actual irreducibly complex structures have been shown to arise in multiple experiments.
4. baseless assertion again. ' some argue that ' by some u mean yourself.
5. no its not lol. these are just assertions there is no argument
6. humans did not emerge suddenly stop lying also yes evolutionary theory permits geologically rapid cases of evolution how's that an issue ?
7. this is again a baseless assertion
8. no one argues that , culture exists in other great apes too
9. who are these critics lmao no one has ever argued that human evolution is linear , no evolution is linear
10. just because some people think god created humans using magic doesn't invalidate the theory.
if u want to critique the theory explain how endogenous retroviruses could infect thousands of loci all orthologous in both chimps and humans , or explain why pseudogenes for embryonic pluripotency are doing in corresponding genomic loci b/w humans and other apes.
Bhut din se intezar tha❤
Assuredly the creation of the heavens and the earth is a greater (matter) than the creation of men: Yet most men understand not.(Quran 40:57)
They think everything getting evolved after created as mobile phones
Barakallah feek
Very informative ❤❤
Bhai please expose albert Einstein,Stephan Hawkings and every scientists.
😂😂😂
@@dark_seid_29 🤣🤣
Also Charles Darwin, and especially their sworn enemy 😎Richard Dawkins...
9:48 Tailbone meantion in hadees 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “There are forty days between the two blows.” They said, “O Abu Hurairah, forty days.” He said, “No.” They said, “Forty.” A month. He said, “I did not.” They said, “Forty years.” He said, “I did not.” Then God sends down water from the sky, and they sprout as plants sprout. He said, “But not from man.” Nothing will wear out except one bone, which is the tailbone, and from it creation will be assembled on the Day of Resurrection.
Sahih Muslim 7414
Evolution is just a theory
Adam and hawwa story is fact 😂😂
Adam was first human created by God in heaven, and eye created from Adam, it mean many human created in heaven,we not falling on earth from heaven,but we taking birth,so what do you think ,how Adam reached on earth?
Existence of Adam and hawwa is a secondary debate. Primary issue is that whether this universe came into existence from nothing? Or there is a creator behind it. And talking about "fact", anything that began to exist must have a creator because otherwise you would stuck into an infinite regress, which is fallacy.
ماشاءاللہ بهای، آپ کی اردو صاف ہوئی ہے
After 3 months brother 😢
My classmate friend used to follow him i rescued him from that type of so called rational Instagram account
MAASHA ALLAH
He even lied about the banana gene its not 40%
Wisdom❤ and Truth❤
Asslam alykum
Brother zeeshan that Indian youtuber made the video for his indian viewers who only have couple of brain celles working but not for someone of your calibre.
Take care ❤👍
Allah SWT ke 99 names h !!!
Un mein ek ye👇 bhi h
*95. Al-Badi (البديع)*
To iska kya matlab h ? Pata h? Nahi pata hoga ! Main kis liye hu ?!
*Al-Badi' (البديع)* :
1. The Originator
2. The Creator
3. The Innovator
4. The Producer
5. *THE EVOLVER*
6. The Incomparable
7. The Unique
🏴🏳️
Ey yoooo broooo....never knew you could speak hindi😅....Take love man...Love you for Allah❤❤
Small changes over period and population segregation leads to speciation.
And how it happens?
@@hassaanwaheed-t9jmutations and natural barriers.
@@hassaanwaheed-t9jEvolution occurs through the process of natural selection, where small, gradual changes accumulate over time, leading to the adaptation of species. These changes often arise from genetic mutations, which can affect an organism's traits.
Exposed more of this kind people.
Maza aa agya zeeshan bhai...❤
Brother finally remembered this channel's password 😂❤
وَعَلَيْكُم السَّلَام وَرَحْمَةُ اَللهِ وَبَرَكاتُهُ
If you ask me which is easier to believe
1: my long long long ancestor was a dumb blind fish or a monkey hanging on tree by its tail
2 there’s a creator a god who created me and everything around me.
I find the 2nd one easier to believe
And he created your mom from the ribs of your father.... subhanallah 😂😂
@@Umarkhan-9280 uff ignorance at peak
She is also your mom and you always say gau mata 🐄🐄🐄🐄🐄🐄@@BlackBeard-lh3mu
@@Umarkhan-9280 so true so better
✨✨
@@mdjakaria4187these people are crazy bro..
Asalam bhai
Indian city sambhal me muslim ke halat per be video bnahe .
Thanks
Bro are you from India?? I heard some news about this place but i wasn't sure if it was real or fake
Mashallah ❤
Everyone Please Forgive My Sister from Yemen Someone has hacked his account
First of all just because atheism is rooted in empiricism rather than faith does not mean that an atheist who believes in naturalism is “rational” i mean who decided that the tag for “rationality” in just rooted in observation
Meri ghalti nahi hai. Maine "Mr. International" phada😅
Please, makes a more video in Urdu❤❤❤❤❤
Smile2Jannah can eat 100 OverSmart Athiest in Breakfast 😂
4:25 science yakin nahi karta kyuki koi bhi proof hain nahi... science us chij ko accept jrur krega jiska koi proof ho..tum proof de do accept kr lenge
We all agree on 🍕 pizza toppings !
great explanation bro
Love from Kashmir valley
Boi kyt rozaa..
@EXTBOY567 kupware.... Che kat roza paan
Kashmir main kaha se
@@adnanmir2873 kupwara sai
@@Hurmankaya chalo thik byt chus kupwair roza..
Your logic is over 95%. Scientists are stupids who believes in theory of evolution & you are intelligent who don't believe in it..😂😂😂
If you can disprove him then do it?
While the theory of evolution is widely accepted by scientists as the best explanation for the development of life, including humans, there are still some scientific aspects that suggest the process may not be fully understood or the only possible explanation. Here are a few reasons why it is not considered a 100% certainty that humans evolved entirely by themselves:
1. Gaps in the Fossil Record: Although there is substantial fossil evidence supporting the theory of evolution, there are still gaps in the fossil record, especially regarding the intermediate forms between species. The "missing links" between major evolutionary stages, such as the transition from apes to humans, are not always clear. While many fossils show gradual changes, the full sequence of these transitions remains incomplete.
2. Complexity of Human Evolution: The evolution of human beings is highly complex and involves multiple factors such as genetics, environmental pressures, and random mutations. Some scientists argue that the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species involves more than just gradual evolutionary changes and might include rare or sudden events (like genetic bottlenecks or environmental catastrophes) that are difficult to predict or explain with certainty.
3. The Role of Genetic Mutations: While genetic mutations are a driving force behind evolution, the process is not always entirely predictable. Some mutations are beneficial, others harmful, and many are neutral. The randomness of mutations and their effects on an organism's survival can complicate the process, making the exact pathway of evolution difficult to trace.
4. The Anthropic Principle: Some scientists argue that the development of intelligent life (such as humans) may be extremely rare or even unique in the universe. The anthropic principle suggests that certain conditions in the universe may be so finely tuned for life to evolve in specific ways that it's unlikely for it to occur elsewhere, or for humans to evolve in precisely the way they did without a series of improbable events.
5. Alternative Hypotheses: While evolution via natural selection is widely accepted, there are alternative theories, such as the idea of "intelligent design" or the possibility of extraterrestrial influences on human development. Although these ideas are not generally accepted in the scientific mainstream, they provide other perspectives on how life, including human life, could have originated.
6. Sudden Development of Complex Traits: Some traits in human beings, such as advanced language, reasoning abilities, and consciousness, appear relatively suddenly in the evolutionary timeline. The rapid development of these traits raises questions about whether they can be fully explained through gradual evolution or if other factors (such as environmental or social pressures) played a significant role.
While there is strong evidence for the theory of evolution, particularly through genetic, fossil, and comparative anatomy studies, these and other uncertainties mean that science does not yet claim 100% certainty about every aspect of the process, especially when it comes to the complex evolution of humans.
Evolution is 100% right but we don't found some species of animals fossil doesn't make evolution 100% wrong.
Brother s2j Exposed Science journey's
Watch Abuzar responds
@Ex_Apostate786 that video is private right now kid
@@utugxutugx Aur Bhi Videoes hai zo So called Atheist ko Answer kiya hai zake dekho
@@Ex_Apostate786 Watch ExHindu Awaz E Haq Indian RUclipsr ExHindu expose Hinduism
@@utugxutugxwatch Awaz E Haq ExHindu Expose Hinduism
बहोत अच्छा काम कर रहे हो भाई लगे रहो
after engineer sahab now zeeshan is also making great response videos
Bhai please make a video on shah jama masjid please
Good job bro 👍
Question:
Kia koi dosra specie he jo apny apko cover krny k liye clothing krta ho? Khana paka kr with different mechanism khata ho? Different languages bol skta ho?
3:15 science chalti hi induction pe hai
Like inferences
Atheist ke liye ek sawaal 👇
Pahle *DNA* Aaya ya *RNA* ?!
RNA. It's simple
@@RehanAhmad-ks3wd for atheist Rna and Dna both are created simultaneously from stardust 🫠
@RehanAhmad-ks3wd tum atheist ho ?!
@@Tausif185Kya uska answer galt hai,?😏ya sach sunke dar gye
Rna bro viruses have rna mostly@@Tausif185
6:15 well done sir 😂
جتنا چاہے جھوٹ بولو؛ ڈارون کی تھیوری درست اور جناب کے ڈرامے حماقت ہی رہیں گے
Brother upload video atleast weekly😊
Confirmation bias is scary🙂
I request you to respond to SeeKen Jigyaasa. that would help a lot. ☺
Atheism aur liberalism mazhab ke manne walo ke liye theory of evolution sabse buniyadi aqidah hai, wo log ise bina empirical evidences ke mante hai.
Pagal log Hain
Adam and Eve ke story se better fit hoti hai 😂
@Ropas365 Adam aur hawwa ki baat sahi hai, proof ke liye Islam ishwar almighty ka dharm kyu hai is ke sabuto per research kare.
@@Bharatiyamulnivasikumbhar420evolution theory se ap isliye inkaar krte hai Qki ye apke religion k khilaaf hai, apne v koi research nahi ki hai.
@@itsanis3798 aap evolution theory ko apne religion (atheism) ki wajah se hi mante hai na?? Kyu ki aap ke relegion ke anusar to jo cheeze 5 senses se nahi dekhi ja sakti un ka astitva hi nahi hai, to fir theory of evolution kaha 5 senses me aati hai????
DR Elvish Silver ko v cover krna brother... assalamu alaiykum warahmatullahi wa barakatuh
Question;
Konsa dosra specie itna zaheen he jis ne ships, aeroplane, space ships, computer, AI, quantum mechanics or quantum computing, etc cheezein ijad ki hun?
Only one God Allah
Evolution is real, but Human beings are not part of it.
That's what i believe.
I alsooo...
@@Rexorazor your belief doesn't matter at all
@@mdjakaria4187 Your stupidity is being watched by the god you worship.
Isn't it Allah who said seeking knowledge is important?
And by that he did not meant knowledge of Islam alone, he meant every form of it.
"Read" is the first word of quran.
Haa bhai hame toh aliens chhod ke gye the naa dharati par!
Marvel ki eternals dekh ke theory bnayi hai kya?
@Adrian-clarke Naa Bhai, me maanta hoon ke Adam aur Ev hi thay Jo chhodke Gaye humme.
Meri own scientific theory explain karsakti hai ye baat ko.
The brother came from Darwin's side, his great-great-great-grandfather was a monkey, but we know ours was Adam.
Monkey and human share same ansestor.
Do some research kid .
You will find many organ in your body that are useless in human like apendix,tailbone ,earbone ect
congratulation you are in madersha uniersity
What's your thoughts on this incident happened in bangladesh what happened to monk of iskcon temple? Who will you defend now ?
Matlab iskcon wale ko ye right hai ki wo apne desh ka jhanda ka apman?
Why do you need his condemnation??
@@inamdurrani9259 didn't he condemned Indian Hindus when they played music infront of mosque? Now this Bangladeshi Muslims killing hindus in Bangladesh so why he doesn't talk about his so called muslim brothers?
Inka hisaab se ek cell bna phir vahi fish bani phir vo fish crocodile 🐊 bana phir snake bna phir monkey 🐒🐒🐵🐵🐵 bna phir ye jo abhi h vo monkey se insaan banne ki koshish kr rha h
Yeah, I also Irritated by him
Assalam alaikum
1. Science doesn't necessarily require repeatability. Conclusions can also be made through inference of data. As an example, when a robber commits a crime and runs away, the police don't see the crime actively happening in front of them. Yet they can infer what happened. Same is the case with genetic testing which used to figure out who the father of a particular person is, in court. We don't see him physically begetting his son, yet we infer it.
2. No it's not true that we infer evolution just by looking at bones (I think you meant to say fossils, which doesn't necessarily have to be bones). Darwin saw that within individual genuses of animals, the different species sometime tend to display characteristics of other species within the same genus, in rare cases. This was difficult to explain under special creation but easy to explain under the idea that they share ancestory, especially given the fact that they always show a particular pattern in terms of biographical distribution and the reversion to previous characteristics were also present under the cases of artificial selection.
3. If people start saying tomorrow that heliocentric theory proves God doesn't exist, that doesn't mean heliocentric theory is false. Many philosophers and scientists have pointed out the simple mindedness of Dawkins when he says evolution proves God doesn't exist. Even his book the God delusion contains many philosphical errors. That still doesn't mean evolution is false.
4. It's completely false that you can't speak against darwin in america. Many well-funded and influential young earth and old earth creationist organizations exist in America. There is even a museum promoting young earth creationism. 40 percent of the population beleive God created humans in their present form less than ten thousand years ago.
5. It is undeniable that some jews, christians and muslims hate the theory of evolution. I don't understand how that is a strawman.
5. Evolution like every other scientific theory and inference mechanism, is based in assumptions, however they are not unrealistic assumptions. All its assumptions are pretty realistic. Without realistic assumptions, we can't do many things in life.
6. Methodological naturalism is very important in trying to figure out stuff. It simply means we will try to understand the unknown by assuming there was not any miraculous intervention. Not hard to grasp when you think about it.
And also macroevolution has been so perfectly been shown to be true in all the decades with new discoveries such as shared pseudogenes, hox genes, jumping genes, endogenous retroviruses, chromosomal fusions, chromosomal inversions in closely related species ,beyond all reasonable doubt that it is extremely absurd to say in today's time that it is based on this or that assumption.
7. Some people before darwin did used to beleive in some sort of evolution, but darwin was indeed the first person to show that all life on earth is related via common ancestory. It is not true that he discovered only natural selection.
8. Fossil evidence shows that cambrian explosion didn't happen in the small time creationists say it did. Watch the video " exposing discovery institute part 2 by " Professor dave explains" to learn more.
9. When scientists dispute neo-Darwinism, they don't mean that macroevolution or common descent itself isn't true. They mean that new mechanisms of evolution have been discovered so our current model of evolution should be renamed.
1. Fossil Gaps and Missing Links:
While many transitional fossils have been found, there are still gaps in the fossil record, particularly when it comes to the intermediate forms between species. Critics often point out the absence of clear "missing links" that definitively show the gradual transition from one species to another, especially between species like Homo sapiens and earlier hominids like Australopithecus or Homo habilis.
For example, despite claims of human-like ancestors, there is no direct, continuous fossil evidence showing a seamless progression of human evolution.
2. Sudden Appearance of Complex Traits:
The theory of evolution suggests that small changes accumulate over time, leading to the development of complex traits. However, the sudden appearance of complex traits in humans, such as advanced cognitive abilities, language, and consciousness, is difficult to explain through gradual changes alone. Critics argue that such complex developments could not have emerged solely through random mutations and natural selection, and might require a different explanation.
3. Irreducible Complexity:
Some critics of evolution argue that certain biological systems are "irreducibly complex", meaning they could not function unless all parts were present at once. For example, the complexity of the human eye or the human brain is sometimes cited as evidence that such systems could not have evolved through gradual, step-by-step processes, as they would have been non-functional at earlier stages of development.
4. Human DNA and the Gap with Primates:
While humans share a significant portion of their DNA with great apes, such as chimpanzees, critics of evolution point out that the genetic gap between humans and chimpanzees is still significant. Some argue that the differences in cognitive abilities, behavior, and physical characteristics between humans and other primates are too vast to be explained by gradual evolutionary changes.
The genetic similarity between humans and primates could be interpreted as evidence of a common designer or divine creation, rather than evolutionary descent.
5. Human Uniqueness:
Humans exhibit unique characteristics, such as advanced problem-solving, abstract thought, art, and culture, which critics argue are not easily explained through evolutionary mechanisms. The "leap" from basic tool use to advanced social structures and creativity might seem too sudden for gradual evolution to account for.
The development of consciousness, self-awareness, and moral reasoning in humans is often seen as a key differentiator from other animals and could be considered evidence against a purely naturalistic evolutionary explanation.
6. Rapid Evolutionary Changes:
Some evolutionary theorists suggest that species can evolve relatively rapidly in response to environmental pressures, but critics point to rapid leaps in human development, such as the sudden emergence of Homo sapiens, and argue that such jumps in evolution cannot be explained by slow, gradual change alone.
The timing of the appearance of anatomically modern humans-with advanced cultural and technological capabilities-could suggest a need for a different explanation outside the framework of gradual evolution.
7. Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design:
Some believe that the theory of evolution may not explain everything about human origins, and that intelligent design (the idea that life was designed by a higher intelligence) could be a plausible alternative. Advocates of intelligent design argue that certain aspects of human biology and behavior show signs of design, which evolution alone cannot adequately explain.
The argument for theistic evolution suggests that God could have used evolutionary processes as a tool for creating life, but this still raises questions about how much of the evolutionary process was guided or predetermined.
8. Anthropological and Cultural Evidence:
Some anthropologists argue that human beings' distinct cultural and spiritual aspects-such as religious beliefs, language, art, and abstract thinking-cannot be solely explained by biological evolution. Critics claim that these aspects of human experience may suggest a deeper purposeful creation beyond purely materialistic processes.
9. Complexity of Human Evolutionary Path:
The human evolutionary lineage is more complex than a simple linear progression. Various hominid species (e.g., Neanderthals, Denisovans) coexisted at different points in time, complicating the story of human evolution. Critics argue that the simultaneous existence of multiple human-like species calls into question the simplicity of the theory of gradual human evolution.
10. Alternative Theories of Human Origin:
There are several alternative theories regarding the origin of humans that challenge the traditional view of gradual evolution. For example, some propose the idea of a divine creation or intervention that directly shaped humanity’s emergence. The idea of parallel evolution or convergent evolution suggests that similar traits and characteristics could emerge independently, rather than through a single evolutionary path.
Aap inki tarha refrance bhi diya kre inki ankhe kholne ke liye
veru good point to point demolition of stupid arguement zishan bhai, however, my hunch is, this guys often exposes hindutva paradigms and thwir irrational beliefs, and this is done by him to show that he is neutral, because darwinism is easiest theory to dismantle
Assalamu alaikum brother Upload more video
SUBSCRIBED😘
Brother zishan make more videos in Urdu so may people can't understand English
Macro we cannot observe qki life cycle badi hoti h.
Isiliy it is not possible for use to observe macro. But it doesnt mean macro evolution hota nai.
Indus is not hindu as u said.
And someone please ask them who created the genes that show mutation ?
Qaiser Ahmed Raja expose whole Darwinism in his channel seekho by Qaiser Ahmed Raja
Apni Khushi manao 🤦 bas ...
🕋☝🏻
Brother I really think if you are trying to reach a hindi/urdu audience that you should title your videos in the urdu/hindi.
Good 👍👍
Aakhir aapki yaad aa hi gaya ke aapka dusra channel bhi hai
He is the son of a desi cow ,so he should advocate darwin evolution
Good content as well
Start ur live stream In urdu plzzzz plzzzz plzzzz......
Sir be regular
There is a reason why it's a "Theory"
Clown germ theory is also a "theory". Does that mean germs don't exist? Learn the meaning of scientific theory forst
And there is a reason scientific theories are different from general theory
@@fahimmuntasir7038
No, scientific theories are not absolute truths:
Explanation
Scientific theories are based on evidence and are considered to be true, but they are not absolutely certain. Theories can be disproven by future experiments or evidence.
- By Google
That's what STJ also said in this video. Saying that we should blindly follow a Theory only because it's a Scientific makes no sense and they say that "We are Rational"
@Billioncompany786 Scientific theory aren’t meant to be absolute truth...Not just scientific theories but scientific facts aren’t absolute truth..
That's why science works bruh...
But a scientific theory is simply the best explanation for any natural phenomena...We threw everything at it,we challenged it every way possible but it still rose to the occasion..That's why it's the highest honour...
Scientific theory changes or improves overtime...Just like darwin's theory of evolution is not really a thing but we improved and added a lot more information to it
And made "modern synthesis of evolution".. which explains the process better as darwin's theory had some flaws...
Even Einstein's general theory of relativity doesn’t work in certain scale..But it is able to explain most of the events or things in our universe..So that's how science works..We improve it overtime with more observation and understanding...It isn't hypothesis it's the best explanation we have got in our hand...
By me-
Also science itself doesn't believe in its theory blindly lol... The concept of blind faith isn’t there in science...
Science doesn’t claim to provide you with absolute truth and that's why it's the most trustworthy resource known to us...If another resource helps you better grasp the universe then good for you mate..
@@Billioncompany786 evolution is as fact as earth being round, if you want to say evolution gonna be debunked in future it's like saying science will prove earth to be flat😂 sorry baradar world doesn't revolves around your fairytales