OJ Simpson Deposition - (Day 5) Jan 26th 1996 - Part 5/5
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- Rarely-seen footage, this is the fifth day of O.J. Simpson's five-day deposition in the civil lawsuit brought against him by the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
This is the first time Simpson has answered questions under oath about his activities just before, during and after the murders.
Note: O.J. Simpson was deposed for the originally scheduled five days between Jan 22-Jan 26, 1996. One month later he was recalled & deposed for 4 more days (Feb 22-23 & Feb 26-27, 1996). In total, O.J. Simpson's deposition took 9 days.
Present in the room are -
Defendant: O.J. Simpson
Representatives: Bob Baker, Daniel Leonard & Robert Blasier
Plaintiff: Fred Goldman
Representatives: Daniel Petrocell, Arthur Groman, Edward Medvene, Peter Gelblum & Yvette Molinaro
Michael Brewer (for Plaintiff Sharon Rufo)
John Kelly (for Plaintiff Louis Brown & the Estate of Nicole Brown)
Videographer: Rod Rigole
Examination by Daniel Petrocelli
Every Time he denied an accusation from the prosecutor. He never looked at the prosecutor eye to eye and always looked down and was shifty eyes. He also constantly looked under the table for some reason day 1 through 5 in the deposition
Check out the water drinking and looking down - no eye contact- when asked about the socks them gloves OMG Dry mouthed And
G u i l t y !!
He’s sure he doesn’t recall not recalling any recollection of not recalling.
The reason the lawyer is asking about the movie so much is I saw another lawyer talking about how the real navy seals were on set teaching oj real death moves & stealth moves to sneak up. One showed him the " death kill" which is pulling ur victims head back very fast & with strength to slice the neck deep so u kill the person fast without sound. These are moves made for war. So petrocelli is trying to show he got ideas from frog man bc oj was dressed in black with the gloves the hat & the silent kill on nicole & Ron . More so nicole bc the poor woman was taken by surprise & after he had killed ron who was bigger & a karate belt. They also say oj had some words for nicole right b4 he ended her bc she had little stan Mark's in her cheek. The way the little stabs were they were able to deduce he was holding her up talking to her with the knife in his hand that was poking her. She was pretty much out if it bc he used the butt of the knife to talk her out so he could deal with ron. This was in some forensic show that examined the autopsy & nicole's home. They ask a lot of questions bc u never know what will come of it & the idea petrocelli was doing was getting enough of oj lying about a bunch of little lies then he could be lying about the big question. Oj doesn't know what " authentic " means? He just likes to say no a lot.
No
@@billyspeight6834 YES SIIIIR HE 1000% DID IT...He was just lucky he had enough money to drag the trial out to exhaustion.But at the end of the day a not guilty verdict doesn't mean anything in the public's eye.95% of everyone who knows about this case knows he's full guilty.You'd have to be blind,stupid or stupid on purpose to want to believe otherwise....lol
@@alexscott730💯
Just so you know, Ron did NOT know karate, thats a myth his sister commented on on her 2019 podcast. I think its important fact to speak about.
ruclips.net/video/4iSosE_KQhU/видео.htmlsi=gE5nljr_KZukASpb
Does OJ RECALL ANYTHING?
Norberg Wins the Oscar at 33:10. LOL 😂😂😂😂
these question are way overboard but the lawyer let him have it. you serious
OMG!!! SERIOUSLY!!!! I NEED TO FIND FROGMAN THE MOVIE!!!!🤣🤣🤣
I think it may have been a tv show pilot . So many pilots never see the light of day & I'm wondering if it even got finished bc oj u know went right to jail after being charged. I could be wrong maybe it was a movie & they put it out. I just figured since they were working on it , it may not have been finished. Checks ojs imdb to see if it's under his credits.
BULLFROG!!! 😂😂😂
@@margob6203 una Ranya, I sopo tampon esa..
How could anyone think he didn't do it esp the part ito actually ruled out that the carpet fibers were matched to the bloody glove ?? I don't know why ito ruled that out but that was in Kardashians & Larry Schillers book about the behind the scenes or the dream team & oj. Also watching that Kardashian 96 Barbara Walter's interview he said " it's impossible for all these people to be in on a conspiracy frame up. Also he said the blood evidence gave him serious doubts. So that's admitting he knew in those statements the dream team didn't think evidence was planted. Also oj failed a practice lie detector w/ the worst score anyone couod get a -23
Marsha Clark decided against using the critical witness who saw OJ in the Bronco the night of the murder. She was pissed that the witness had already given an interview.
How much time totally did OJ spend in jail for all court cases?
About a year
9 years for the vegas robbery and about 18 months during the murder trial
That's a mighty big plan ya got there...
He made a call earlier the night nicole was killed to the maid at Nicoles house. He knew she wasn't going to be there
I never knew that!
I wondered what he did with the knife and the bloody clothes?
He didn’t do it he couldn’t have gotten rid of then in such a short amount of time
According to the theory in the If I did it interview, he said the clothes had to be got rid of by someone.
@@GA-fz2wt yes that, and he also could’ve dumped it in the airport garbage.
@@blue-calla of course he did, also where is the black rucksack he didn't come back with but kato & Park saw it loaded into the limo going. Infact, kato testified on the stand that he was going to help OJ load the small black bag but OJ said no leave that I"ll do it.. Where is that bag on return? 🤷♀️
You take 3 bags and come home with 2 in less than 24hours in the hotel? 🤔 Strange eh
@@GA-fz2wt yeah, exactly. It’s insane. If it weren’t for the Rodney King brutality and if DNA was more widely understood by the public at that time, he would’ve easily been convicted. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence can see that OJ committed the m*rders. The evidence is overwhelming. And his depo from the civil case further proves it. His confession in the “If I Did It, Here's How It Happened” book & “The Lost Confession” interview were the cherry on top.
I’m at least glad he was forced to give a depo for the civil case and served jail time for the robbery. It’s not justice for Nicole & Ron but at least he was held accountable for once in his life and caged for the monster he is.
I always wanted to believe he was innocent !!! Clearly he did it but I prayed it wasn’t him
I find it ironic that he is answering "NO" to all questions regarding blood and hair found everywhere but his defense in criminal case was LAPD planted it. Why wouldn't he answer the question that way in civil case????? I wasn't impressed with D Petricelli after watching first three or four days but he now I am impressed because the murderer is walking into DP trap.
Going to the bathroom ? Really ??
Does OJ believe his own answers?
26:38 did you try them on without latex gloves? OJ answered "No" and this is a lie UNLESS OJ is specifically referring to the exact pair of blood stained gloves. Because, little known fact that people forget, he DID try on an identical pair in brand new condition.
The line of questioning clearly was referring to the specific pair of gloves. Geez you guys be reaching for straws. NOT GUILTY
He didn't try on the brand new ones with latex gloves on
@@flunder50 You fanboys have a real shitty character radar....lol...You're adoring a piece of shit and you're okay with it.That says a lot about you.Get a conscience fanboy.This coke head butchered 2 people for bullshit reasons.
It would too disgusting to try on the gloves that could have killed people with
A man that admitted he knew style because he had to look good for fans and the cameras. When asked what kind of shoes, slacks, shirts, that he owned he doesn't know???
19:57
12:38 Yes, forgetting a director's name is what you should be ashamed of.....
no it's not being able to explain why you're blood and hair was found at the murder scene and the victims hair and blood was in your home.
@@octoman511 Lol, the OP was being facetious.
37 evidence. Needle
30:32 he cannot name a store he shops for clothes.
Do you have any clue about anything??
mmmnoh
29 socks would only be limited rom the top of the shoe to put leg
The lawyer taking this deposition is annoying af. He just keeps asking the same questions over and over again until he gets the answer he wants. O.J. needed better representation on his side.
Bull frogs and knives movie scene that crazy you do not have play move kill someone, no evidence of murder weapon, anyone c would have done this especially the life style of Nicole
I agree Annabelle
Yes she o ving
Shoving answers down o.j. throat, maybe grilled by Marcia Clark, she. Try lead witnesses to what ahe wanted said
Watch the video of OJ talking about his "hypothetical " book ..."If I did it" . Then see if you think poor OJ is innocent.
Looking at his beautiful face is sad. It must be really hard on Sydney who loves her parents. Think about Sydney frequently. Way too much to deal with.
Beautifull face???...What the f#ck is the matter with people like you?...
Can you imagine him mad. Jeckyl hyde
Attendance
Dont assume but I have hrard many assumptions 22:44
I blame Rasputin......
Cato eard noice last night
29 most ome back u dy night...
22 I. Hampe
20 shoea Sho I was earing
Who, what, where , my Lord
Hahahaha loser
OJ lawyer letting too many in-necessary questions get in , what does a movie have to do with civil trail
@@dixiedeed4918 he used a knife in that movie
So what he used a 🔪
For sure
Cut it out peterrcui. What ever your name civil suit , asking was lights on ?
This cop doesn’t know how to question omg tryna trick him every question
Ain’t a cop, genius.
A cop lol
Wow
Stupid questions what does moving bull frog have do with civil .case...crazy
@@dixiedeed4918 Has alot to do with it. he was taught the same moves that he cut Nicole's throat with.
36 i sume so
3p yor hair on
Earl Cambell ws bad ass
This what we call bringing a black man down double jeopardy then again in Neveda, over charged trying pay back not Guilty murdering ex-wife and her friends this man been there taking stupid questions, where you go, what you do ? So much time wasted, in call for dispositions, case LA close why retrial him so unfair
Again shut the fuck up!!!!😠😠😠😡
Payback for what exactly? He was found not guilty in the criminal trial so why should there be “payback”, are you suggesting the jury delivered the wrong verdict?
What does frogman have to do with this ???? Simpson attorney should have objected, too much non sense
@@yourmajestymyhighness9273 bless you !!!!
I agree.
Stupid questions trying trick Simpson, harassment a second trial this is so wrong
Absolutely agree. O.J. lawyers let that other lawyer harass him into giving him the answer he wanted. No wonder why he lost the civil case.
Ana Star he lost because he’s guilty,he should be thanking his lucky stars that the jury in the criminal trial wanted payback for that no good loser Rodney King!
@@Gracelee681 of course Mr baker OJ lawyer let pet run over OJ the question was irrelevant, where keep socks, blk socks, most men do wear black socks
@@Gracelee681 you right about that
What was you wearing during frogman, how stupid, who taught you how use the knife, stop the question attorney baker