Stereochemistry of nucleophilic addition reactions| Nucleophilic addition reaction to carbonyl group

#stereochemistryofnucleophilicadditionreactions#nucleophilicadditionreactionsofcarbonylcompounds#cyclohexanonesystems
Reagents Playlist
• Playlist

[@adityamacwana4541]

Mam seriously you are awesome... You know where we are getting mistakes.. And you also solved thank you so much

[@pankajchoudhary7079]

Bhagwan apko apke jeevan Mai har tarakki de.....

[@BWS2027]

mam You explain chemistry very easy ways by which we understand without any problem
👍👍👍👍👍

[@SwatiSharma-gb7ph]

Thank you so much for being so regular.

[@rockychem9045]

great explaination mam . keep it up

[@Cartoon78626]

Thanks ma'am for regular uploading the topic really nice teaching with command on the subject

[@amitkumarnayak3727]

Thank you ma'am for another video on reagent...

[@luckysharma1943]

very good and clear explanation mam..😊

[@masrakul1042]

Thanks mam for conceptual explanation.....

[@pankajchoudhary7079]

Kas AP jaisa teacher 12 board Mai koi hota

[@amanahmad180]

Mam i preparing for jee adv.
But your lectures very awesome some time i Go beyond my syllabus for increasing my knowledge in chemistry 😃

[@maheshm7229]

Thank you so much Ma'am..

[@fashionstyle9500]

Nicely explained....thanks...🥰

[@shubhalaxmimahanta5198]

In case of gilman reagent you said that there is a cavity between two ring hence attack will always favour up side regardless of steric hindrance! But here we have to take consider the steric hindrance! Why so? Please clear the doubt

[@saimantisaha1639]

Because in that case no 1,3 diaxial interaction was present ...which is the main factor here ...

[@rajasadiq6458]

Super trick for learning

[@girijashankar6912]

Excellent 👍

[@mis_llaneous]

Hello mam, I have a small doubt. In the comparison between axial and equatorial attack, if the antibonding of C-Nu bond getting more electron density in case of axial than equatorial, then the C-Nu bond should get weaker in case of axial attack, then should it not be opposite, like the equatorial attack will be more favored than axial, according to this logic?

[@chemicalsciencevilla5788]

Very good teaching

[@buddhadebmondal5531]

At 13:20 the Me group will take the axial position due to 2-alkylketone eff

[@titirkoley6424]

2-alkyl ketone effect does not ensure that 2-alkyl cyclohexanone would be in axial form. It only states that energy difference between axial and equitorial is less than expected..means it is possible to get higher % axial form than theoritical expectations as there may be an eclipsing interaction with carbonyl. Now as Jyoti di has taken an example with methyl group, there is no confusion as it is reported in Nasipuri very clearly that me group is too small to create eclipsing strain with carbonyl. Equitorial methyl is major conformer for 2-methyl cyclohexanone.

[@pritykarmakar4937]

Thank you so much mam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@Dhananjaysir19]

Superb 👌👌👌

[@vaibhavyalzare3290]

madam please take one lecture on stereochemistry of cyclopentane, cyclobutane ,cyclopropane ring as soon as possible ,,really u r awesome for teaching..

[@kanikaverma2687]

Mam donation in sigma* will weaken the carbon nucleophile bond do we want that??

[@MOHIT-vr3zn]

Mam liAlH4 attack karta hai to AlH4- ka Al-H bond attack karta hai na ki H- jo CH3 se jyada balki hai to AlH4 ko bhi niche se hi attack karna chahiye na plz explain

[@maheshwaman3390]

Clayden 32 stereoselectivity in cyclic molecules. Page no. 828..👍👌

[@swagathbhanja3443]

Mam is it neccessary for jam ???

[@pritamrudrapaul1314]

Mam if C-H donate electron to the sigma 🌟 orbital, bond order decrease isn't it?...so nucleophile have less chance to make sigma bond on axial attack. Please kindly clear this doubt.

[@Saurabh9598]

Mam reagent ke upper depend bhi krega ki axial attack hoga ya eq.

[@mojahiransari4709]

You are great.

[@abhinavpurohit2001]

mam one doubt only...cyclohexanone m sapne btaya nu axial s aayega kuki jo antibonding bnega usme easily C-H ki electron density ka transfr hoga to doubt ye h ki transfr kaise hoga do u have ani proof for tht?? and agr aisa transfr hota h to fr kisi k antibonding m electrons aaye to fr uska bonding tut jayega obviously to fr nu nikal jayega.. so pls solve my doubt mam asap

[@JChemistry]

You can find this concept in Organic Chemistry by Clayden.
Also electron transfer completely Nahi hota hai ki bond hi break ho jaayega , this is just the delocalisation.
And we know already, delocalisation leads to decrease in energy of the system.

[@idealchemistrybysyedsabirs9380]

Madam ak number explaination h AP ka AP ki class kaha par

[@chemicalguruji2338]

Thank u so much Mam

[@pujaacharjee9182]

Plz upload a video on nucleophilic substitution .

[@feelalonebeautiful2891]

Mam aap live coaching start krdo g

[@santoshjoshi5278]

Mam, how I prepare my self for gate with msc.

[@subhamsharma9555]

When will amino acid.. Be uploaded.

[@JChemistry]

I've already completed amino acids
ruclips.net/p/PLYXnZUqtB3K-GJ_N1UwiWmFoNvDWguMvY

[@subhamsharma9555]

Sorry i want to write nucleic acid.. Actually.. At the same time i was watching amino acid so brain...dully it was it was nucleic acid when will it be uploadid

[@maheshm7229]

Based on this concept send me more questions please Ma'am...

[@vindhyajagan9458]

Hello mam. Is any available for online video classes package for chemical science net exam from you

[@JChemistry]

No not yet

[@chemconduct]

Plz complete pericyclic

[@kanchanmaurya1285]

Koi jabab hi nhi h apka mam

[@nikhatshaheen1060]

Tnku mam plz complet perrycyclic.....

[@kathyayinikathya7348]

Super madam

[@missrajanisolanki8311]

Thnku so much di

[@devendramishra603]

Thank you for your lectures, at time 6 minute you said CH bond is weak than CC bond but bond energies of the two is reflecting otherwise moreover CH bond is also almost nonpolar as significant energy difference is not there, Kindly cite the reference of your explanation and try to find some other explanation for electron donation ease. I may be wrong, Kindly explain, thank you.

[@JChemistry]

Try to read Cieplak model from somewhere ...you'll find a better explanation ...check the Google once

[@devendramishra603]

Yes Cieplak Model is the answer, thank you.

[@shwelpajadhav5905]

thank you😊

[@raghav8452]

Thanks a lot mam

[@amitghoshal1211]

Please mam tell me that IIT Patna or IIT Bhubaneswar good for MSc chemistry?????🤔🤔🤔 Please...

[@buddhadebmondal5531]

IIT Bhubaneswar

[@adityaadhau563]

Thank you mam

[@bibhutimohapatra6231]

Mam please upload a video on Michael addition reaction

[@akhilbhardwaj9738]

C-H bond is stronger than C-C bond , please correct it .

[@thestronger4027]

:) smart examiners..

[@dikshakumari6909]

What is the meaning of H,D, F

[@kreetyrani4739]

Hydrogen, deuterium and flourine

[@KamleshYadav-lk6ug]

Thanks mam...

[@aaradhyapriyam814]

🙏🙏

[@visible3467]

❤❤❤

[@pradumpatel5335]

Mam aapka aawaj gunj raha hai

[@vismiforever8357]

Are madamji thoda pause to lia kijie please means thodasa side ho jaya karia likhne ke bad fir rough kijie.... Please

[@thespritualchemacademy5433]

hello mam hi

[@123nim]

First view

[@yasodharam3480]

please please please please please please mam teach in English please please please please

[@sebin26]

Please make videos in English only

[@jatinpatro3541]

Thank you mam. 👍