Janet seems very timid and completely non-sensationalist, to me she doesn't seem like a woman who faked stuff to get attention, she looks like a woman who has been damaged by a real trauma that she went through and doesn't really enjoy talking about it.
PanchoSupercat I went to school with Janet and actually went to the house with her one lunch time. I saw enough in the short time i was in there. Its all real and true and Janet sure hell would not lie.
Looking on the documentaries it never seemed as though any of the family got off on it, Janet's Mum seemed a quiet and very matter of fact lady with no desire create any hysteria. I noticed the lights on the stage set flickering during this interview with Janet and wondered if the spirit was still following her!!
My mum has always been a magnet for paranormal stuff especially after the passing of all my grandparents and again she is someone who doesn't sensationalise any of it so I think that is part what I see in Janet, also my dad is kind of a skeptic and even he is running out of explanations for the weird things that go on in my parents home, such as something pinging across the room one day while they were both at the dining table. My Mum found a button on the floor and it was an RAF button from the blazer my Grandad had been buried in a few months earlier! One of their dogs has major issues at night of being terrified, panting and wanting to get out the house. I am very open minded about the unknown.
+aidsbrigade But there is a chance that it was real, and that's the point. If you decide to not believe it, that's fine, but don't go making assumptions when you weren't even there.
aidsbrigade Im a guy who doesnt simply "believe" things, especially not paranormal things. But saying something like "there is NO chance" is plain stupid and even arrogant. There is a 99% chance its fake, but not 100%. Water is 100% fluid, grass is 100% green. But you can not say to 100% that there is nothing (or something in that matter) after death. Nobody ever came back after definitely dying so the only thing you can say to 100% certainty is that YOU DONT KNOW. You dont know if God or gods exist, you dont know if spirits or life in general exists outside our dimension. You dont know if alien life exist inside our universe. If you are going to say you are to 99.99% sure, then thats fine. But please dont have the ignorance and arrogance to claim that you have the omniscience to know that there is NO chance something unusual happened. Maybe you are right. Maybe you are wrong. Thats it.
100% agreed very very disrespectful. Notice how Janet doent try to intervene to tell that lady what she think. I say this because Jannet is not putting herself out there on social media trying to prove to people what happened to her. A person who has gone through something like that doesn't have to convince because deep down in her heart she knows what she went through and she shouldn't even have to argue with anyone what she experienced. Same goes for the rest of the family and friends who were there.
and that Sceptic was a foul just because she has not had a pronominal Encounter for good or Ill does Not make it not a Reality i am an agnostic on such things but very Interested and open Minded and i Don't doubt that there may have been a soul cold Bill who did not wont to cross but some of it from the Films sounds a bit far fetched as i don't belive in demons or hell
I love how the skeptic talks about "the girls" as if Janet isn't even really sitting right next to her. "The girls must have been under an enormous amount of pressure" -hello? She's sitting right there? Hasn't anyone ever told you it's rude to not acknowledge someone's presence when they are in the room. She's the cats mother.....
No, you're wrong. Debra could easily have said; "You and your sister." LeyLey makes a valid point. She was ignoring Janet by talking across her, as though Janet wasn't there. She was more interested in speaking to Playfair. She felt more comfortable, doing that. Shes a bitch, like yourself.
I agree....that was very rude! Her opinions on the case are absolutely fine - she's completely entitled to them, but to say at the end 'I feel sorry for the girls really because they must have been under enormous pressure after a while to come up with something' really crosses the line. She's saying right in front of Janet and Guy 'you're liars and you were lying'. So, so rude!
You can tell 30+ years later that dreadful period still lives on in her, you can see the look on her face. It's so sad that people have to suffer through something so unbelievable.
'aidsbrigade,' It may be unbelievable, to skeptics like yourself. Skeptics have no understanding of psychic matters. They prefer to believe their own bullshit.
@Alber I'm ok, but I don't think that you are well. You need to see a doctor. I cannot continue in discussion with you. I wish you well, but must say goodbye. SC
Janet Hodgson looks like a regular simple person, she speaks in a humble way and her face expressions are so clear and sincere that bringing that skeptic and the stupity of the things she said was not only offensive but unnessesary . this is why many people is afraid to speak about phenomenas cuz they are going to be mistreated . I trully feel sorry for Janet on that show but hopefuly with the serie people get another perspective of their lives and not being judging without knowing what is like.
Hey Natalie,mate I saw something when I as six years old and it's haunted my life ever since,I've hardly spoke about it,it sounds crazy,maybe I should say about it on the net?
smokerings617 brickiller - RUclips as good as a place as any. I speak on mad subjects on here that I would never talk about with any other media outlet, or sometimes my mouth. I've had my own weird things go on all my life, nothing too big but just something...
Agreed! When you have a guest like Janet, who has for the most part tried to hide her identity for privacy as an adult, I think it was unprofessional to have a skeptic like that as a guest at the same time. What they should've done was have the skeptic on AFTER Janet to discuss this story or on a completely different episode to discuss this story. They should've focused the interview on Janet and no one else mostly to get the most out of the rare chance to interview her. I think it was disrespectful to have a skeptic there because of that, and it's just going to discourage her from giving other interviews about this case.
she was possessed and had no control- the ghost was feeding on her energy. its like somebody is on alcohol, you do stupid things and when sober realised what you have done is wrong!
I agree that she genuinely encountered an evil spirit as a child and was possessed by it. she couldn't have produce this voice if she wasn't possessed. on the top of that she is not the only person in this world who reported their traumatic experiences with an evil spirit! why would a child fake this anyway! it doesn't make sense!!
+aidsbrigade wtf u have a 17 month ild daughter that can do a 72 year old man voice wow put her on television but don't say misinformation because it's really not
I'm not saying it's not a hoax and I'm not saying it is, but don't you just wish that one time the hard core skeptics get proven completely wrong and literally get the shit scared out of them.
It's called the "point of death". That's when they get shocked into realizing that where they are going is nothing like they imagined. Leave it to divine providence. It's just a matter of time. No need to waste time trying to convince stubborn people of greater things, salvation is a personal journey that we must all undertake necessarily ALONE.
I believe that Satan's dominions are responsible for all ghost activity. Their job is to mess with your mind your beliefs and to divide. Skeptics are always going to be skeptical and be hidden in the dark from the supernatural.
Telekinesis has just been 'officially' scientifically proven. The video I watched before this one says - One person says maybe Janet is doing these things by herself. They asked her could they move something from the room upstairs to the lower level... Let's just say something was found where it shouldn't have. 'Enfield case true or fiction' Title is something like that.
arent skeptics just ignorant fools who sit in their home and do nothing? look at youtubers who visit haunted places, many of them start as skeptics but now they are having second thoughts because they genuinely seen some shit
the sceptical woman Deborah does what debunkers ALWAYS do - she doesn't address address the reported facts but takes a patronising 'Well, you see, people make mistakes ...' attitude !
That is what so offensive about her trolling. She is stalking this page like it is her career. A real skeptic has more respect than this. She is just hateful and dismissive making up shit along the way.
For some strange reason I feel she is telling the truth and it really happened. She comes across as someone who has suffered a trauma through what she went through and doesn´t really want to talk about it.
the people who absolutely dont believe have just never experienced anything and are very closed minded. there are things in this world that cant be explained
I have been dealing with the dead since I could remember(literally when still in diapers) I'm turning 43 this month. People like this skeptic is the reason I was terrified to tell anyone when I was a kid. Around 13/14 my sensitivities kicked into high gear and I started telling people. My 2 teenagers have also dealt with them since they were babies. Except I have always spoken VERY openly and non judgmental about spirits with them. Ive also helped many other children and adults deal because its scarey and there are con artists out there. Ive never charged a penny for helping them if they are gifted or have a haunting etc. I never will. Sorry got a bit off topic there :)
@aidsbrigade could be a number of things. Bill is a common name :) "Evil" ghosts tend to lie. They frequently pretend to be other people to try and gain trust in the living. Especially with children. I have personally seen and have audio recordings(I'm a sensitive) of spirit that appear to be children when playing with children or show themselves as kids to someone who is a mother because many mothers would want to help a child(even if deceased) that needs help or is sad etc. Perhaps "Bill" used that name and info because there was a link to someone there? I wish I could speak to Janet one day! Troublesome spirits can do some very bizzare things if it suits them. Especially during an attachment. I do believe Janet was/is a sensitive though. Kids that dont know how to control their gifts can actually create a true poltergiest situation. Unfortunately "poltergiest" has always been a dead person who messes with the living. When in reality, its the human(often combined with spirit) creates those strong energies and that create moving things, stress, voices, flying objects, lights flickering etc.
When you produce sufficient evidence, we will believe. We are open minded but also rational and all the so called ‘evidence’ for this case is questionable at best. Especially as the voice about bill’s death details is wrong as I’ve mentioned before. Lots of eye witness accounts, which as everybody knows is not credible in the slightest. People are just superstitious and believe what they want to believe. Not one of the photos proves anything. Even the so called levitation photos can be reproduced by a child jumping out of bed.
It's not gonna happen because it's not real. If it did happen it would mean that its in her head and she is suffering from delusions. Just like you do.
Bless her heart she is genuinely scarred and haunted by the ordeal it is written all over face....I wish her the best and pray she has found a way to cope and live a as normal a life as possible..
What would janet get from faking a story like this? she doesnt do interviews, she doesnt like the publicity and waht they get an article in the newspaper saying their house is haunted, how would that help the hodgens in any way? just because you cant explain it doesnt mean it does not exist
aidsbrigade or maybe they are sharing stories about the subject at hand... if i tell you a story about meetin an old friend its not because i think im cool its because im sharing a story fuck head
Instead of arguing about it behind a screen, obviously there are better ways to confirm your assumptions. Why not try find a local house that people believe is haunted? Go check it out for yourself, tell me what you find if anything. And remember the number 1 rule guys. Just because you dont find anything, doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Im a science minded person and cannot believe I just said that. It only applies in this case though not the religious argument. I can say it because I have experienced paranormal activity myself. So please guys, go and find a place and go with some friends to make you more comfortable.
Fascinating to see how Janet still seems so anxious and reserved as a result of her experiences but she plucks up the courage to basically tell that woman to do one, voice still shaking showing it was hard for her.
candid0111 it was a hoax a silly woman who clearly has no life making up something like this shes acting serious to try and convince people it was real
I'm more inclined to believe that The Amittyvile case to be more of a hoax than the Enfield one. With regards to Amittyvile, the Lutz family knew the tragic history of the house, with Defoe killing his family, it's possible to make up a story about the house being haunted on that bases to make money, which they did with the Jay Aston book and the pathetic films, but I believe this family didn't make any money out of it. It was out of the girls control that the press were involved, though in some cases it was blatantly obvious that the girls were doing some of it, either for attention or to keep it going, they got caught faking it, besides, the girls admitted it more than once that they did, this discredits the actual genuine events that the girls may have been copying. I still remain doubtful of the voice coming from Janet though. It seems clear that Janet has gone through some distress, but the other sister may not have been quite so effected.
I was being a smart ass and I'm not here 2 convince any1. as a matter of fact the post had nothing 2 u or anyone else that do not believe. u just couldn't control urself
This woman is a prime example of "skepticism" at it's worst. Although she has no real evidence that they've faked anything, she immediately puts them on the defensive with accusations to throw them off guard. Instead of getting to the meat of the topic, she has them defending their integrity. It is a prototypical technique used by debunkers and one of the primary reason people have little respect for them. Note that she brings up two cases where the debunkers themselves were caught out in lies - Amittyville and the Fox sisters. She doesn't appear to be bright enough to have realized her mistake. Debunkers are most vicious when the evidence is good, they throw out lies, engage in character assassination, and try to humiliate people into silence.
This is what is called Psuedo-Skepticism, in other words these people aren't real Sceptics at all. They have an entrenched belief system and address the points that are the easiest to address and fail to even mention the things that are harder to explain away. Joe Nickell another Psuedo-Skeptic wrote about the case and stated that a police woman saw a chair merely shake when in reality the police officer saw the chair levitate and move four feet across the room. Deborah even inadvertantly made herself appear foolish to those who have read into the case by mentioning names such as Barrington with having 'problems' with the case when in reality Barrington thought there was considerable evidence for strange inexplicable occurences. She just encited random names that were involved in the case to backup her false claims.
people are entitled to see evidence if claims like this are expected to be believed. So far all the evidence has been hear say and he said she said .. and a dodgy photo that just looks like a teenage girl playing 'trampolines' on her bed.
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
I believe her, felt like slapping that lady who was trying to say they are lying. Janet looks like this has really affected her. Living in a haunted house can make people go mad & need psychiatric help...
no the girl was making them out to be a liar... saying that she felt for the girls "because they had to come up with new ideas to scare everyone". thats a class-act-bitch trying to get her point across with a lot of speculation. "this and this happened, so this must happen naturally" o shut the hell up. Of course most people dont want to believe it, because: 1. They are too distanced from it 2. Are scared 3. Following the general thought that ghosts are fake
aidsbrigade I saw hearing weird knocking and a weird voice is proof, but if you encounter that with: its all fabricated... then nothing is ever going to be proof.
She looks still possessed by a ghost to me. I was born in England but have heard of ghosts getting into especially very young women. I'm a Hindu so I'm not even allowed to go to a cemetery or crimatorium for this very reason...
+Keshi Raj I didn't realize Hindus can't go into cemeteries, etc. Thank you for teaching me something new today! How I love learning new things from people. :)
thank you so much janet, you are so brave for standing up there and being questioned like that again. I do believe you as someone who has suffered from seeing ghosts most of my life, the supernatural is real, very much so and it can greatly affect peoples lives. so greatful for her speaking up. that must have been very hard...
pat squires 1 second ago please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
@@patsquires3654 That doesn't disprove anything. The girls played pranks on the journalists, but that doesn't disprove the testimony of 30+ independent witnesses.
Janet said the very words I was thinking, " you weren't there ". I thought I would be near to tears as Janet was with this sceptic who seems to know everything.
The film was a joke, i was pissing myself with laughter when she was in that room and see that CGI face aka old guy funny as fuck, it was 4 supposed to be a horror movie felt like a comedy film
The fact that you found it "scary" is interesting,maybe the reason that you are so ferociously attacking anybody that believes in the Enfield Case,Is that you are really fighting a battle with your own subconscious mind ,that believes there is some truth to the paranormal.This is really your own inner conflict being taken out on the public,to justify your own internal fears,somehow believing that if you can convince others,maybe you can then convince yourself.hmmm?just maybe,a little bit?
This case is so well documented unlike most that have come up over the years, also that this was happening when most people we're too afraid to report paranormal stuff for fear of being ridiculed, unlike now where most people are more open minded - unlike the woman on this programme who is only interested in selling more copies of her magazine. As they say you need to experience things to believe it and i for one hope Janet and her siblings find peace after all these traumatic events.
Anyone else notice the studio lights to Janet's right and the back ground close to Janet- keep flashing brighter and then going dim- before turning back to normal light. It's happening on and off throughout the entire interview. Very intriguing- Perhaps Janet carries a presence with her yet-
Please note on the tape where the light flickers. I just sat through this total waste of time, with the sound off, picture maximized, and saw nothing that would even qualify as a flicker. Please, if I'm missing something, let me know WHERE ON THE TAPE IT IS. Second: Go to mark 2:23 on the tape. It's a black and white picture of the family. Now allow it to run and check the lower right hand of the picture. Is something moving, or am I having a stroke? Please advise, but I want only non believers to respond as you other lot are waaaaay too gullible. Thnx.
This is interesting. When you watch footage of the house and girls from the time the poltergeist was taking place Janet and her sister seem almost giddy about the whole thing, or at least not particularly disturbed with one of them claiming they've "gotten used to it" over time. But here we have Janet decades later and she seems sincerely traumatized by the whole event. The scarcity of interviews and lack of capitalization of the story (i.e. sensationalist books) at least, for me, lends a lot more credibility to this whole thing. In any case something definitely happened beyond their control in that house.
Yeah I think there's a lot we didn't see happening to Janet. I think at first they found it harmless fun, exciting but then it must have got out of control
I'd bet that at their young ages at the time, suddenly having all that media attention gave them that awkward feeling, which kids will respond with by grinning and giddiness. I agree... she's definitely a traumatized adult.
Janet seems a very level headed lady and very traumatized by those events which centered around her even to this day bless her. Some of the things spoken from those voices which came from Janet back then,were obviously of a mature nature not what a young eleven year old would say! People obviously have their own beliefs but I for one strongly believe in the events that took place. The skeptic lady is talking such mumbo jumbo! She wasn't even there and just talks about those who thought it a hoax as she herself is a non believer! She never in her life witnessed such events that for one is true,such people get you my nose!
aidsbrigade Jeez, it’s been a month! Stop wasting your time on comments like these, Just post a public comment, let everyone see it and don’t reply since you’ve proven yourself right. Whether fake or not, We still cannot prove it, even if you have tons of evidence. I’ve seen you on videos related to this, doing the same darn thing, don’t you have anything to do besides youtube? Because you’re like replying about 60% of the comment section trying to debunk this, okay we get it! So stop it, you aren’t helping at all. Now don’t come at me with a hella big of a sentence 🤦♀️
@@anderite2582 pat squires 1 second ago please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
aidsbrigade I just do theres something about her i cant yet figure it out. But i understand only because ive seen things before. Things other people wouldn't understand or for that matter believe me at all. Its hard for someone to tell you that your full of shit when they haven't even experienced anything like it before. Just my personal experience thats all.
aidsbrigade I don't ask people to for the very same reason. But i respect you as well because everyone is different we don't all have the same life you know.
Ive experienced something paranormal like what I believe youve experienced Vanessa and I cant say I believe or disbelieve this investigation yet, I just have to experience it to make sense of it. I know that many people dont understand it, its like anything really. A mental illness can only be assumed by someone who hasnt experienced its severity, Its called having a small mind. We should be glad, we have been enlightened. People can go out and experience sky diving, eating from 3 star restaurants riding camels in the dessert, swimming with sharks, an overdose on drugs, sex with countless people and they will still not understand what its like to have seen something like this. Those examples were a bit extreme but I hope you can understand what I mean. Though I dont broadcast what ive seen anymore because people laugh at it I like to hear the stories of others.
Paul Sack I understand where your coming from. I to don't like to talk about things that ive seen of course because people always try to find an explanation for everything. Thats not how it works though like i said everyones life is very different i never thought of it as a curse or anything just unusual. Thank you for sharing I like the feeling of not being the only one.
I experienced living with a poltergeist, it started to attach itself to my nephew , the most frightening experience, everything you don’t believe, voices, whispering, levitation, projectile vomiting, wardrobes opening and clothes being thrown out! All apparently brought on by having tarot cards and spirits being brought into the house through spiritual readings.
aidsbrigade,...Janet is not a liar. Nor is she an admitted liar. Agreeing that she attempted to fake activity, does not make her a liar. Quite the opposite, in fact.
@@stuartcertain6363 My dear Stuart, I'm going to tell you one thing: We must go through the darkest tunnel; but if you take my hand and walk with me, we will come out unharmed, heading for paradise. If you refuse my help, you will inevitably succumb. Eve can't exist without Adam, and Adam is alone without Eve. You know it. Be courageous at the right moment and don't disobey me. 'Deus Vult'
I believe Janet 100%, I've had paranormal experiences before. That skeptic is extremely rude and arrogant, glad Janet put her in her place. She has no right to call Janet a liar she wasn't there.
I am NOT a skeptic, but a believer in the paranormal. I'm also a realist. I've been watching all of the information and documentaries and interviews with these figures, Janet, Fairplay, the photographers, and their stories change. Not moderately, but significantly. Fairplay says in the documentary he was introduced to the case by a man who'd gone to hear him lecture who asked his help. In this interview, Fairplay says he saw one of the investigators giving an interview on the local news and didn't want to miss the opportunity. To compound that, with regard to Janet appearing on the dresser, the photographer states in the documentary that Janet had been heavily sedated "Enough to knock out an elephant" but fought and battled them so hard it too multiple adults to restrain her in bed even still, and upon leaving the room they turned to find her atop the dresser. In another interview with Miss Goldman, he doesn't mention her being sedated at all and claims they head no footsteps or floorboard creaks and went upstairs on a routine check and found her on the dresser. It isn't difficult to remember facts of such extraordinary occurrence, but these parties seem to misremember or rewrite far to much for me to be comfortable with their recollections.
Sounds like most of the witnesses were influenced by an array of different information and misinformation, which affected their perception and understanding of the events they witnessed... the misinformation held by the witnesses, is especially responsible for polluting and tainting the witness perceptions and recollections of the events! Which basically makes it extremely difficult (if not impossible) to determine the what side of each story is real and valid! Total bummer! But it’s still really neat to hear the victim speak of her experiences, cuz experiences aren’t about fact, it’s what she felt and saw and heard, what she experienced, regardless of what witnesses did or didn’t see/understand/believe... and although many people may lie about this sort of thing, I really think Janet is being honest!
Phaylen Fairchild read Guy’s book then tell us it’s not real. Also I would be more suspicious if their stories were the same because if you have a group in a room watching something play out in front of them. Each person will remember different things. Why is that do you think? Because we are individuals and we see, hear, smell, touch everything in our own way.
Phaylen Fairchild I believe it because she has nothing to gain .plus my cousin was in school when a chair was lifted a flung at a teacher who was telling her off for being late .to many people including police saw objects moving .the story does not change I don't understand why your saying it is .your welcome to your opinion which is totally wrong of course
This lady is very disrespectful like she is 'better' than anyone else. Very disrespectful. Unless you LIVE thru it, will you truly believe in it. Maybe this lady needs an experience of her own...or does that have to be in a 'controlled environment' as well?? 😒
Cat Rowe agree. I hate people like that. She was speaking from basically what she learned as if she was reading from a book and not personally at all. I bet she was paid to debunk the fact this is a true story and not any child should ever have to experience. I have a paranormal past as well and it was terrifying but thank Jesus Christ no where near The Enfield Poltergeist story
I TOTALLY believe Janet. My heart goes out to her and ALL the trauma she has been through. Much less the ridicule from completely close minded ignorant disrespectful fools as this woman is. SHAME ON HER...!!!
Janet comes across being very honest and seems genuinely believable about her experiences as a child. However listening to her speaking I do think these experiences have not necessarily left her mentally intact (and I honestly say this with compassion.) The skeptic woman is rude and arrogant.
I absolutely believe what happened to this family, as a child back in the late 70s we had a poltergeist in our house that tormented us for years , things would be thrown around , doors slamming, my bed would shake violently and I was even thrown down the stairs, so much happened there's too much to mention. Needless to say my parents eventually sold the house after years of suffering. After moving to a new built house all the negativity ceased but did get visitations that were comforting. I have had spirits around me all my life and strange occurrences In all three houses my wife and myself have owned but nothing really negative like my parents first house. watching the series of the Enfield poltergeist bought back a few memories I would rather forget, what his woman and her family went through as a child was much worse than what we went through and can imagine how this has affected her life. Me, I'm always expecting something to happen when I enter a room on my own even now.
lia exlemus 1. Why am I a geek?? lol. 2. It's **you're**. IDIOT. I'm also perfectly calm thank you. It comes with the territory of being a rational, sensible thinker. So YOU'RE the one who should probably calm down! :D
aidsbrigade fuck me you really are sad aren’t you 😂😂😂Imagine pitting all this effort and spending your time replying to all of these comments that are against what you ‘believe’😂freak of nature you critter.
aidsbrigade, Strange response from you......you, who has cast aspersions upon the girls regarding their intelligence. You reveal yourself to be a shape-shifting demon, when you want to be. You cannot be trusted with any point, you make.
Janet has awe-inspiring courage and I am saddened by the ignorance she must have faced growing up in stiff-upper Briton in the 70's. Indeed, and just to clarify to any skeptic watching this footage, it was NOT and NEVER the norm for anyone to speak candidly about paranormal happenings, not least the media in its then stuffy and unexciting infancy.
Listen.. with all do respect to all parties of this conversation. Simply put.. if you're a skeptic you HAVE TO go out there and prove to yourself nothing weird is going on. Put in the effort..at-least 30 days/nights in a haunted house, such as the Amityville or conjuring house or else you're not worth listening to on national television. You're just judging a obviously, far-fetched story from a distance, you're not the one spending great parts of your life investigating murder houses trying to gather proof of the most mysterious phenomena known to man-kind. I'd take great offense if a skeptic was NOT there with me to experience these things, just judging the story after not even putting in an effort to find the real, truth.
aidsbrigade then that's the skeptics problem. There are still many events of unexplained phenomena happening all over the world. There is proof look up the extended trailer to 'sir noface.'
aidsbrigade well duh but it's the first government sanctioned paranormal investigation that promises definitive proof that ghosts exist. So you'll have to wait until it comes out.
aidsbrigade had it right the first time, no matter how unfortunate his name is. You can't just claim any insane thing and then say to sceptics "Prove to me it's NOT real! You can't!" Nobody can prove that anything isn't real, it's not possible.
+aidsbrigade wow ... you just don't stop! I've been reading through the comment thread & you have replied to almost every comment. Pretty time consuming. Why is it so important to you to be on this thread spouting off your bs? Give it a rest & go do your own research rather than asking everyone else for 'proof'! Go find a skeptic site so you can rattle off with other close-minded individuals! ;-)
pat squires 1 second ago please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
@@patsquires3654 Even the investigators at the time acknowledged the girls faked some of the activity. I mean, it happened over a year, so I'd be surprised if they didn't. The book written by one of the investigators is well worth a read.
If something traumatic happens you will remember it down to the last detail. For example if you saw a 70(ish) year old man with long grey hair, crawling across the road without a shirt or shoes on wearing light brown homemade pants while driving on a one lane country road,you are about to ask him if he needs help he looks up into your car window with black eyes and says nothing..you will remember that. I don't agree with the "not remembering" I often hear when it comes to these kinds of answers given to people who have had an encounter of some type.
"Long-term" memory involves hard-wiring of pathways in the brain based on real experiences. Replaying the events through those pathways may in fact consolidate the recollection. Suggestion, however powerful, eventually fades and becomes an incoherent jumble of facts because it does not involve such pathways.
The Enfield case is highly interesting, of course. There were undoubtedly weird goings on. Many agree now that Maurice Grosse and Guy Playfair, whilst being very caring and sensitive, went into the case looking for answers to their own beliefs. Confirmation bias was definitely there. Janet seems very disturbed as an adult and I have a great deal of sympathy for her and everything she's had to deal with. The investigators put her through a rigorous sequence of experiences. The poor girl didn't stand a chance.
I believe you, Janet. You are far too scarred by these experiences. It is very unfortunate that you were picked on by such a malevolent spirit. I hope that you have healed from these experiences and have gotten on well in your life. You don't need such sensational scrutiny anymore.
Reread my posts aidsbrigade in relation to the lights, one must always look to logic and the mundane first. I have had undeniable experience aidsbrigade of survival and if that upsets you so be it.
This Debra woman what an arrogant pratt. She talks about historically, but two of the people involved are there!. She quotes that the SPR said it was a hoax yetone of the members of the SPR is next to her telling her that is wrong,. Skeptics are great at putting their own version into things they never witness.
@@honeybadger9425 millenials, boomers oh come on!! Didn't we learn anything from Germany 1933 back then?? Putting people in a certain category because they were born in a certain time frame? Like that is normal. Hitler did the same back then. Just see everyone as an individual.
@@desdes1822 Oh please spare me the left wing PC BS im talking about how a camera worked back which obviously the majority of millenials wont know about and if that offends you i dont care.
I just watched the original television interview special (30+ minutes). The camera set up wasn't a video camera or continuous but a still photo cam set to take pictures at intervals. I believe it was set only for motion like a wildlife camera in the girls bedroom. Also, watching the original interview with the girls, Janet can be seen taking an intake of breath as the voice continues constant. I have yet to see a ventriloquist ever be able to do that. Both girls are able to talk over the voice as well. I've (my family ) used to experience low level paranormal activity. When we were going through buying our house from having rented it for years, it was a slightly stressful time for my parents and we used to hear heavy footsteps going up and down the hall. We used to joke it was my mom's deceased father making sure we were okay and assuring us we were doing the right thing going through with the mortgage. After the paperwork was done, no more footsteps. My sister and I once woke at the same time to see a green mist humanoid shaped apparition, see through and about 3 1/2 feet tall with a large head standing by our gerbil cage inspecting them. Just watching, and we watched it until it disappeared and we went back to sleep. Didn't know we were both awake and saw the same thing till the next morning. My sister was like 12 and I was about 10. Once we caught a tiny flash of light in a dark room on my old video camera I used to mess with, so we turned the lights on and looked for a possible source but found none. I may have been older than 15, maybe 17. I think I'll look to see if I still have that video. Hope I didn't record over it. Other slightly weird stuff, minor things, none of which ever scared us. But I've never been afraid of "scary" movies. So I have no reason to think this family didn't go through something paranormal and traumatic.
pat squires 1 second ago please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
That's probably why she doesn't want to be interviewed, that woman was just straight out saying they were faking.. She was kind enough to do the interview and they did exactly the thing and reason she doesn't do them....
I do believe Janet’s home was possibly encountering something paranormal but I also believe that some of it was the kids playing around when nothing was happening !
I think you are right. Kids will do that, especially if it gets them attention. The problem is though, it then puts into question everything else that supposedly happened!! I personally just don't know what to believe. Wish I did!!
Yeah quite a few, my nan still lives on the next street to where it all happened. I drive by the house on my way to the train station. I find it so interesting!
lamb92 Me, too! I love hearing stories by people that were around the time things happened...and just to know your nan lives near it and you can drive by the real house? I envy you!! It sounds exciting!
No way was this a hoax. An overwhelming number of credible, impartial witnesses for one; members of the police, press, neighbours went on record to say what they witnessed. The lollipop lady who worked the crossing for the school opposite (Janet's school) saw Janet levitating around the room through the bedroom window, from the street! I've seen Janet interviewed over the years, and, as others have pointed out, she doesn't come across as a sensationalist or liar. I believe every word, and I think it's insulting of that 'expert' to contradict her account of what took place and left her and her family traumatised.
aidsbrigade just do some resarch , thats how i knew . they kept living in that house ( so no house gaining) , they were remembered has the "wierd family" (social exclusion ) and they also were offended and critisised from people like you that tougth it was a hoax . So if it was a hoax (wich a doubt it , mainly because the lorraine couple stated that it was a case of demonic possession) it wouldnt be a hoax with the purpuse of economic benefit , and theres no point of doing a hoax that big just for the fun ...
+aidsbrigade You are sounding bitter now and it is unbecoming. Their family was poor and living in a council house that they did not own. The people that came in to investigate were not paid by this family as she was a single mother not making much money. Now the guy who is an author, writing about it. What the fuck did you expect him to do? He is a writer of paranormal phenomenon. That is one of the reasons his expertise was valued to begin with. This situation did more damage to this family than it did anything to profit them. Of course she fixed her fucking teeth. She is not still eleven. She grew the fuck up and made changes in her life as we all do. If you do not believe in the paranormal fine, I can respect that. Just stop behaving like a mad cap bitch about something you know nothing about.
Shavenhamster Thank you! Aidsbrigade is sounding really ridiculous. Of course she got her teeth fixed and more than likely by the NHS. TO expect this woman at 50 to be and look the same as the girl at 11 is just dumb.
I'm sorry but to all the people saying she "faked it" you're TOTALLY wrong you CANNOT fake something for that fucking long and get away with it, maybe if you're the Government sure, but not just a regular simple family in the 70's, and look at them, clearly none have the intelligence to pull something like that off. And even if they did fake it, 30 years later I'd be getting sick of telling the same story, and the family never got any money, support or anything, just the label of "that weird family" totally not worth faking it if you ask me.
Ever considered that it's the reporters and the psychical researchers who faked it? Oddly there is no video footage, even though such technology was readily available at the time.
A family in the early part of the twentieth century faked some photos of fairies, and carried on insisting they were real until the 1980s, when they finally admitted to how they had done it.
Look up James Randi and Steve bannachek, in the 80s they fooled scientists for about 4 years into believing they were psychic. There was another guy, can't remember his name with Steve. James was just in the background monitoring.
kempouk so let me get this straight, you just jumped to some insane conclusion and called someone a name over the internet, for no reason, how mature are you? lol grow up.
I completely agree with the haunting. This skeptic is just a fool with no idea what went on in that house. I’ve followed this story for years including watching the original spoof documentary on BBC’s called Ghost Watch. I was a little girl when watching the spoof with my sisters and cousin sisters trying to find a comfortable space so we could all go to sleep without fear. In the spoof, Sarah green was trapped in the basement in the end. Woke up early to see if Sarah green would appear on Saturday live.
1 second ago please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ? the police statement is very intreasting as both police officers see the chair move and conduct tests to make sure there is no trickery involved ?
I have a niece. When she was in her preteens, just about Janet's age... her voice was changing. Just for fun or out of habit... she would periodically talk with this deep, low tone raspy voice-- quite similar to the voice of this poltergeist. So, the whole claim that a young girl couldnt possibly make those sounds is just rubbish. Secondly... am I to believe that a dead person who finds themselves miraculously rejoined with the living-- a feat so rare, it must be as shocking to them as it is to us... decides to use this fleeing opportunity to pull-off a few juvenal pranks? Throwing Legos, flipping chairs, telling half-baked 'knock-knock' jokes and banging on walls? The whole thing sounds like a trivial waste. It would be like Aliens finally visiting Planet Earth-- only to spend their time working the weekend shift at Petco.
'aidsbrigade,' Just joking. There is nothing about you that concerns me. If name calling and insinuations were a game show; you'd win hands down. However, when it comes to this case.....nah!
aidsbrigade by all means...continue..tis your right as a free citizen of the world...i just find it entertaining is all. Especially seeing the back and forth with in the commenters.
Janet seems very timid and completely non-sensationalist, to me she doesn't seem like a woman who faked stuff to get attention, she looks like a woman who has been damaged by a real trauma that she went through and doesn't really enjoy talking about it.
PanchoSupercat Couldn't agree more.
PanchoSupercat I went to school with Janet and actually went to the house with her one lunch time. I saw enough in the short time i was in there. Its all real and true and Janet sure hell would not lie.
Looking on the documentaries it never seemed as though any of the family got off on it, Janet's Mum seemed a quiet and very matter of fact lady with no desire create any hysteria. I noticed the lights on the stage set flickering during this interview with Janet and wondered if the spirit was still following her!!
Maria MaM That's amazing. I have experienced many things myself. She seems very lovely and living with unknown things happening changes a person.
My mum has always been a magnet for paranormal stuff especially after the passing of all my grandparents and again she is someone who doesn't sensationalise any of it so I think that is part what I see in Janet, also my dad is kind of a skeptic and even he is running out of explanations for the weird things that go on in my parents home, such as something pinging across the room one day while they were both at the dining table. My Mum found a button on the floor and it was an RAF button from the blazer my Grandad had been buried in a few months earlier! One of their dogs has major issues at night of being terrified, panting and wanting to get out the house. I am very open minded about the unknown.
Always find it funny when a person who wasn't even there tries to tell others what happened (or didn't). Ridiculous.
+aidsbrigade But there is a chance that it was real, and that's the point. If you decide to not believe it, that's fine, but don't go making assumptions when you weren't even there.
aidsbrigade Im a guy who doesnt simply "believe" things, especially not paranormal things. But saying something like "there is NO chance" is plain stupid and even arrogant. There is a 99% chance its fake, but not 100%. Water is 100% fluid, grass is 100% green. But you can not say to 100% that there is nothing (or something in that matter) after death. Nobody ever came back after definitely dying so the only thing you can say to 100% certainty is that YOU DONT KNOW. You dont know if God or gods exist, you dont know if spirits or life in general exists outside our dimension. You dont know if alien life exist inside our universe. If you are going to say you are to 99.99% sure, then thats fine. But please dont have the ignorance and arrogance to claim that you have the omniscience to know that there is NO chance something unusual happened. Maybe you are right. Maybe you are wrong. Thats it.
@aidsbrigade You will believe one day madam...
@aidsbrigade You will believe when you die!
@aidsbrigade And,i know what i am talking about!You?No!
I wish they hadn't of included the skeptic in the interview. I feel like it is very disrespectful to Janet to have that lady there.
100% agreed very very disrespectful. Notice how Janet doent try to intervene to tell that lady what she think. I say this because Jannet is not putting herself out there on social media trying to prove to people what happened to her. A person who has gone through something like that doesn't have to convince because deep down in her heart she knows what she went through and she shouldn't even have to argue with anyone what she experienced. Same goes for the rest of the family and friends who were there.
@@hollzie7348 i Don't believe it but i Don't doubt Janet's Clames
and that Sceptic was a foul just because she has not had a pronominal Encounter for good or Ill does Not make it not a Reality i am an agnostic on such things but very Interested and open Minded and i Don't doubt that there may have been a soul cold Bill who did not wont to cross but some of it from the Films sounds a bit far fetched as i don't belive in demons or hell
Skeptics are often sighted as being rude.
Yes, there should only ever be one side to a story....😂😂😂
I love how the skeptic talks about "the girls" as if Janet isn't even really sitting right next to her. "The girls must have been under an enormous amount of pressure" -hello? She's sitting right there? Hasn't anyone ever told you it's rude to not acknowledge someone's presence when they are in the room. She's the cats mother.....
No, you're wrong. Debra could easily have said; "You and your sister."
LeyLey makes a valid point. She was ignoring Janet by talking across her, as though Janet wasn't there. She was more interested in speaking to Playfair. She felt more comfortable, doing that.
Shes a bitch, like yourself.
@@davidpearson6346 you are a virgin
I agree....that was very rude! Her opinions on the case are absolutely fine - she's completely entitled to them, but to say at the end 'I feel sorry for the girls really because they must have been under enormous pressure after a while to come up with something' really crosses the line. She's saying right in front of Janet and Guy 'you're liars and you were lying'. So, so rude!
@Ater Miles Take care. SC
You can tell 30+ years later that dreadful period still lives on in her, you can see the look on her face. It's so sad that people have to suffer through something so unbelievable.
aidsbrigade enough of the lies
'aidsbrigade,'
It may be unbelievable, to skeptics like yourself.
Skeptics have no understanding of psychic matters.
They prefer to believe their own bullshit.
@@stuartcertain6363 shut up you melt
@@ace-bw6fn fuck off bollocks face.
@Alber I'm ok, but I don't think that you are well. You need to see a doctor. I cannot continue in discussion with you. I wish you well, but must say goodbye. SC
Janet Hodgson looks like a regular simple person, she speaks in a humble way and her face expressions are so clear and sincere that bringing that skeptic and the stupity of the things she said was not only offensive but unnessesary . this is why many people is afraid to speak about phenomenas cuz they are going to be mistreated . I trully feel sorry for Janet on that show but hopefuly with the serie people get another perspective of their lives and not being judging without knowing what is like.
Hey Natalie,mate I saw something when I as six years old and it's haunted my life ever since,I've hardly spoke about it,it sounds crazy,maybe I should say about it on the net?
smokerings617 brickiller - RUclips as good as a place as any. I speak on mad subjects on here that I would never talk about with any other media outlet, or sometimes my mouth. I've had my own weird things go on all my life, nothing too big but just something...
Agreed! When you have a guest like Janet, who has for the most part tried to hide her identity for privacy as an adult, I think it was unprofessional to have a skeptic like that as a guest at the same time. What they should've done was have the skeptic on AFTER Janet to discuss this story or on a completely different episode to discuss this story. They should've focused the interview on Janet and no one else mostly to get the most out of the rare chance to interview her.
I think it was disrespectful to have a skeptic there because of that, and it's just going to discourage her from giving other interviews about this case.
100% agreed
You're right she definitely looks simple alright
I don't think the blonde lady was a liar she seemed like she was being genuine
she was possessed and had no control- the ghost was feeding on her energy. its like somebody is on alcohol, you do stupid things and when sober realised what you have done is wrong!
yeah shes not a liar its really real :-( the voice creeps me out xd
I agree that she genuinely encountered an evil spirit as a child and was possessed by it. she couldn't have produce this voice if she wasn't possessed. on the top of that she is not the only person in this world who reported their traumatic experiences with an evil spirit! why would a child fake this anyway! it doesn't make sense!!
+aidsbrigade wtf u have a 17 month ild daughter that can do a 72 year old man voice wow put her on television but don't say misinformation because it's really not
+aidsbrigade i get what your saying but the thing about your 17 month daughter and 5 year old its complete BS
"You have to see things to believe them and we were there and you weren't" WELL SAID.
I was in your moms bedroom she sucked my dong. I was there you weren’t
I'm not saying it's not a hoax and I'm not saying it is, but don't you just wish that one time the hard core skeptics get proven completely wrong and literally get the shit scared out of them.
It's called the "point of death". That's when they get shocked into realizing that where they are going is nothing like they imagined. Leave it to divine providence. It's just a matter of time. No need to waste time trying to convince stubborn people of greater things, salvation is a personal journey that we must all undertake necessarily ALONE.
I believe that Satan's dominions are responsible for all ghost activity. Their job is to mess with your mind your beliefs and to divide. Skeptics are always going to be skeptical and be hidden in the dark from the supernatural.
Telekinesis has just been 'officially' scientifically proven. The video I watched before this one says - One person says maybe Janet is doing these things by herself. They asked her could they move something from the room upstairs to the lower level... Let's just say something was found where it shouldn't have. 'Enfield case true or fiction' Title is something like that.
He did, I meant on the original case.
arent skeptics just ignorant fools who sit in their home and do nothing? look at youtubers who visit haunted places, many of them start as skeptics but now they are having second thoughts because they genuinely seen some shit
the sceptical woman Deborah does what debunkers ALWAYS do - she doesn't address address the reported facts but takes a patronising 'Well, you see, people make mistakes ...' attitude !
hey tepee see where my ball went
Real or not, you weren't there so you can't correct anybody.
Your interpretation of events or information is not facts. It's your perception/projection only.
Clear hoax to you and your ways of thinking only. Look at her, her reactions, if not real it would be more of a psychological explanation.
That is what so offensive about her trolling. She is stalking this page like it is her career. A real skeptic has more respect than this. She is just hateful and dismissive making up shit along the way.
Billy wants a damn biscuit!
Somebody get Billy a biscuit.
+Jane Doe
None of this would have happened if Billy and the Crooked Man, had their damn biscuits!
SO GIVE THEM FRIGGIN BISCUITS!
I ain't your darned house elf. Get 'em yourself.
Jane Doe
That makes the Crooked Man very aroused!
Jane Doe
He's no longer Crooked...
For some strange reason I feel she is telling the truth and it really happened. She comes across as someone who has suffered a trauma through what she went through and doesn´t really want to talk about it.
the people who absolutely dont believe have just never experienced anything and are very closed minded. there are things in this world that cant be explained
I have been dealing with the dead since I could remember(literally when still in diapers) I'm turning 43 this month. People like this skeptic is the reason I was terrified to tell anyone when I was a kid. Around 13/14 my sensitivities kicked into high gear and I started telling people. My 2 teenagers have also dealt with them since they were babies. Except I have always spoken VERY openly and non judgmental about spirits with them. Ive also helped many other children and adults deal because its scarey and there are con artists out there. Ive never charged a penny for helping them if they are gifted or have a haunting etc. I never will.
Sorry got a bit off topic there :)
@aidsbrigade could be a number of things. Bill is a common name :) "Evil" ghosts tend to lie. They frequently pretend to be other people to try and gain trust in the living. Especially with children. I have personally seen and have audio recordings(I'm a sensitive) of spirit that appear to be children when playing with children or show themselves as kids to someone who is a mother because many mothers would want to help a child(even if deceased) that needs help or is sad etc.
Perhaps "Bill" used that name and info because there was a link to someone there? I wish I could speak to Janet one day! Troublesome spirits can do some very bizzare things if it suits them. Especially during an attachment. I do believe Janet was/is a sensitive though. Kids that dont know how to control their gifts can actually create a true poltergiest situation. Unfortunately "poltergiest" has always been a dead person who messes with the living. When in reality, its the human(often combined with spirit) creates those strong energies and that create moving things, stress, voices, flying objects, lights flickering etc.
When you produce sufficient evidence, we will believe. We are open minded but also rational and all the so called ‘evidence’ for this case is questionable at best. Especially as the voice about bill’s death details is wrong as I’ve mentioned before. Lots of eye witness accounts, which as everybody knows is not credible in the slightest. People are just superstitious and believe what they want to believe. Not one of the photos proves anything. Even the so called levitation photos can be reproduced by a child jumping out of bed.
@aidsbrigade how did she know his name was bill?
@aidsbrigade the police gave statements of seeing objects flying across the room how do you explain that?
Thumbs Up if you'd like to see Deborah Hyde get the shock of her fucking patronising life one day by experiencing similar activity in HER home!
This comment needs more likes lol
It's not gonna happen because it's not real. If it did happen it would mean that its in her head and she is suffering from delusions. Just like you do.
Barry Allen
Yeah, see the bitch get thrown across the room from her own bed and then come back to This Morning and apologize..
Barry Allen i would love that. A few slaps in that stuck up face would be nice.
I'd love that
Bless her heart she is genuinely scarred and haunted by the ordeal it is written all over face....I wish her the best and pray she has found a way to cope and live a as normal a life as possible..
@aidsbrigade She hasn't made a fortune. Your jealousy shows, yet again.
I believe ,so sorry Janet that some don’t ,hope your well and happy today .
What would janet get from faking a story like this? she doesnt do interviews, she doesnt like the publicity and waht they get an article in the newspaper saying their house is haunted, how would that help the hodgens in any way? just because you cant explain it doesnt mean it does not exist
aidsbrigade yep the kind of attention she gets must be phenominal "the girl who was possessed"
aidsbrigade or maybe they are sharing stories about the subject at hand... if i tell you a story about meetin an old friend its not because i think im cool its because im sharing a story fuck head
Instead of arguing about it behind a screen, obviously there are better ways to confirm your assumptions. Why not try find a local house that people believe is haunted? Go check it out for yourself, tell me what you find if anything. And remember the number 1 rule guys. Just because you dont find anything, doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Im a science minded person and cannot believe I just said that. It only applies in this case though not the religious argument. I can say it because I have experienced paranormal activity myself. So please guys, go and find a place and go with some friends to make you more comfortable.
+Apple Pie I agree, she was a child at the time, no reward other than the thrill of it would be required
***** I agree with what you said but I believe that they didnt leave because they were poor
Fascinating to see how Janet still seems so anxious and reserved as a result of her experiences but she plucks up the courage to basically tell that woman to do one, voice still shaking showing it was hard for her.
she probably didn't want to get rumbled .
Janet does not look 'right' at all. I believe her.
aidsbrigade Na i don't think she is acting. she seems disturbed.
aidsbrigade I said i believe her. I don't think she is acting.
aidsbrigade your life must be well bad and lonely, you comment way too much and take to much offence on these videos lol
candid0111 it was a hoax a silly woman who clearly has no life making up something like this shes acting serious to try and convince people it was real
I'm more inclined to believe that The Amittyvile case to be more of a hoax than the Enfield one. With regards to Amittyvile, the Lutz family knew the tragic history of the house, with Defoe killing his family, it's possible to make up a story about the house being haunted on that bases to make money, which they did with the Jay Aston book and the pathetic films, but I believe this family didn't make any money out of it. It was out of the girls control that the press were involved, though in some cases it was blatantly obvious that the girls were doing some of it, either for attention or to keep it going, they got caught faking it, besides, the girls admitted it more than once that they did, this discredits the actual genuine events that the girls may have been copying. I still remain doubtful of the voice coming from Janet though. It seems clear that Janet has gone through some distress, but the other sister may not have been quite so effected.
I think Debra should go home with Janet for a couple of nights! lol
It was a joke, why so serious?
aidsbrigade
this doesnt concern u dumbass
yeah I had lunch with him yesterday da. if I could prove he does exist we wouldn't have this discussion.
I was being a smart ass and I'm not here 2 convince any1. as a matter of fact the post had nothing 2 u or anyone else that do not believe. u just couldn't control urself
This woman is a prime example of "skepticism" at it's worst. Although she has no real evidence that they've faked anything, she immediately puts them on the defensive with accusations to throw them off guard. Instead of getting to the meat of the topic, she has them defending their integrity. It is a prototypical technique used by debunkers and one of the primary reason people have little respect for them. Note that she brings up two cases where the debunkers themselves were caught out in lies - Amittyville and the Fox sisters. She doesn't appear to be bright enough to have realized her mistake. Debunkers are most vicious when the evidence is good, they throw out lies, engage in character assassination, and try to humiliate people into silence.
This is what is called Psuedo-Skepticism, in other words these people aren't real Sceptics at all. They have an entrenched belief system and address the points that are the easiest to address and fail to even mention the things that are harder to explain away. Joe Nickell another Psuedo-Skeptic wrote about the case and stated that a police woman saw a chair merely shake when in reality the police officer saw the chair levitate and move four feet across the room. Deborah even inadvertantly made herself appear foolish to those who have read into the case by mentioning names such as Barrington with having 'problems' with the case when in reality Barrington thought there was considerable evidence for strange inexplicable occurences. She just encited random names that were involved in the case to backup her false claims.
people are entitled to see evidence if claims like this are expected to be believed. So far all the evidence has been hear say and he said she said .. and a dodgy photo that just looks like a teenage girl playing 'trampolines' on her bed.
It was all fake. I know because I experienced real poltergeist activity but I haven't tried to gain anything from it.
Get your medications checked.@@djmossssomjd8496
@@djmossssomjd8496 neither did they.
Screw that skeptic, I believe Janet.
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
pat squires so the cop, and many witnesses are lying? Bullshit.
@@cmac5365 i dont believe the policewoman was lying but i do belive janet was lying about the voice as she almost admits in the video
then you are too gullible for this world
I believe her, felt like slapping that lady who was trying to say they are lying. Janet looks like this has really affected her. Living in a haunted house can make people go mad & need psychiatric help...
no the girl was making them out to be a liar... saying that she felt for the girls "because they had to come up with new ideas to scare everyone". thats a class-act-bitch trying to get her point across with a lot of speculation. "this and this happened, so this must happen naturally" o shut the hell up. Of course most people dont want to believe it, because:
1. They are too distanced from it
2. Are scared
3. Following the general thought that ghosts are fake
aidsbrigade I saw hearing weird knocking and a weird voice is proof, but if you encounter that with: its all fabricated... then nothing is ever going to be proof.
She looks really affected & that could be the reason she doesn't do any interviews. This was a one off.
She looks still possessed by a ghost to me. I was born in England but have heard of ghosts getting into especially very young women. I'm a Hindu so I'm not even allowed to go to a cemetery or crimatorium for this very reason...
+Keshi Raj I didn't realize Hindus can't go into cemeteries, etc. Thank you for teaching me something new today! How I love learning new things from people. :)
thank you so much janet, you are so brave for standing up there and being questioned like that again. I do believe you as someone who has suffered from seeing ghosts most of my life, the supernatural is real, very much so and it can greatly affect peoples lives. so greatful for her speaking up. that must have been very hard...
I believe her
hi Michelle it's a**ie s boy I belive her too don't like the other bit*h though x
The sceptic? Me too
Michele Knight then ur a lunatic too. Crazy bitches.
CORNWALL GHOST HUNTING : Not true! Shes alive!
Michele Knight so do I
Poor Janet's face when the 'expert' dismisses everything she's experienced. That adds to the trauma.
pat squires
1 second ago
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
@@patsquires3654 That doesn't disprove anything. The girls played pranks on the journalists, but that doesn't disprove the testimony of 30+ independent witnesses.
I believe the family of the Enfield poltergeist suffered a terrible ordeal and wish them best for the future.
anyone here who came for conjuring 2 ?
ya that movie scary af
hell yeah
+tbone it wasn't scary
yeap
lol .... yessss
She seems shaken to her core to even reminisce about it!
Janet said the very words I was thinking, " you weren't there ". I thought I would be near to tears as Janet was with this sceptic who seems to know everything.
True or not Conjuring 2 is one of the best story written horror films ever.
Wasnt scary
The film was a joke, i was pissing myself with laughter when she was in that room and see that CGI face aka old guy funny as fuck, it was 4 supposed to be a horror movie felt like a comedy film
yes! when the dog did a morph I was laughing so much.
The fact that you found it "scary" is interesting,maybe the reason that you are so ferociously attacking anybody that believes in the Enfield Case,Is that you are really fighting a battle with your own subconscious mind ,that believes there is some truth to the paranormal.This is really your own inner conflict being taken out on the public,to justify your own internal fears,somehow believing that if you can convince others,maybe you can then convince yourself.hmmm?just maybe,a little bit?
Vera Farmiga is a great actress, can't wait to see the sequel. So beautiful and talented.... She is great in bates motel.
Hahahaha "you wasn't there luv"
I was.
aidsbrigade eh?
That sceptic is a joke
You are joke, if u really believe in this
@@jakubfrei3757 no your a joke how about you try barking with your mouth closed
@@sakura-i7u how about you go read a science book
This case is so well documented unlike most that have come up over the
years, also that this was happening when most people we're too afraid to report
paranormal stuff for fear of being ridiculed, unlike now where most people are more open minded - unlike the woman on this programme who is only interested in selling more copies of her magazine.
As they say you need to experience things to believe it and i for one
hope Janet and her siblings find peace after all these traumatic events.
Yes exactly typical it hasnt happened to me so definately dont excist WOW
Hope that sceptic gets haunted and possesed
That skeptical was incredibly rude and dismissive
Anyone else notice the studio lights to Janet's right and the back ground close to Janet- keep flashing brighter and then going dim- before turning back to normal light. It's happening on and off throughout the entire interview. Very intriguing- Perhaps Janet carries a presence with her yet-
I noticed that too
I think it's an intended technical glitch.
woah i see that too
Please note on the tape where the light flickers. I just sat through this total waste of time, with the sound off, picture maximized, and saw nothing that would even qualify as a flicker. Please, if I'm missing something, let me know WHERE ON THE TAPE IT IS.
Second: Go to mark 2:23 on the tape. It's a black and white picture of the family. Now allow it to run and check the lower right hand of the picture. Is something moving, or am I having a stroke? Please advise, but I want only non believers to respond as you other lot are waaaaay too gullible. Thnx.
BTW, I don't buy it as something supernatural. I think it's the way the picture is cropped. Still, I'd like verification that I'm not having a stroke.
This is interesting. When you watch footage of the house and girls from the time the poltergeist was taking place Janet and her sister seem almost giddy about the whole thing, or at least not particularly disturbed with one of them claiming they've "gotten used to it" over time. But here we have Janet decades later and she seems sincerely traumatized by the whole event. The scarcity of interviews and lack of capitalization of the story (i.e. sensationalist books) at least, for me, lends a lot more credibility to this whole thing. In any case something definitely happened beyond their control in that house.
Yeah I think there's a lot we didn't see happening to Janet. I think at first they found it harmless fun, exciting but then it must have got out of control
I'd bet that at their young ages at the time, suddenly having all that media attention gave them that awkward feeling, which kids will respond with by grinning and giddiness. I agree... she's definitely a traumatized adult.
That poor woman. Her eyes are so haunted and sad. I want to give her a big hug.
Janet seems a very level headed lady and very traumatized by those events which centered around her even to this day bless her.
Some of the things spoken from those voices which came from Janet back then,were obviously of a mature nature not what a young eleven year old would say!
People obviously have their own beliefs but I for one strongly believe in the events that took place.
The skeptic lady is talking such mumbo jumbo! She wasn't even there and just talks about those who thought it a hoax as she herself is a non believer! She never in her life witnessed such events that for one is true,such people get you my nose!
aidsbrigade+ Agressive at the skeptic because she thinks she's lying when she clearly was not.
aidsbrigade Jeez, it’s been a month! Stop wasting your time on comments like these, Just post a public comment, let everyone see it and don’t reply since you’ve proven yourself right. Whether fake or not, We still cannot prove it, even if you have tons of evidence.
I’ve seen you on videos related to this, doing the same darn thing, don’t you have anything to do besides youtube? Because you’re like replying about 60% of the comment section trying to debunk this, okay we get it!
So stop it, you aren’t helping at all.
Now don’t come at me with a hella big of a sentence 🤦♀️
aidsbrigade then praise yourself for thinking that to yourself 🤦♀️
aidsbrigade k
@@anderite2582
pat squires
1 second ago
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
11:39 well done Janet for defending yourself.
Haha you bell end. She’s lying
Does anyone else notice the light flickering in the back?
Stfu
lol
Oh, how erudite! I'll respond in kind: No, YOU STFU, Sammy Campbell. There, now I'm at your level. Geeze, it's dark down here!
Pls stfu I'm scared
yes the flikkering light was the first thing i saw when i played the video.Weird!!
The Conjuring 2 scared the fucking shit out of me I tell ye
It was awesome
It wasn't scary, but It's pretty fun to watch
laksmitha Yes, I couldn't stop laughing when that firetruck rolled in xD
Samuel Wall yeah, that was hilarious 😂 especially when the whole family started knocking at their neighbors house
Yeah that nun was real nasty. She wasn't there to help thats for sure.
YOU WEREN'T THERE - YOU DON'T KNOW!!
I believe you janet
aidsbrigade I just do theres something about her i cant yet figure it out. But i understand only because ive seen things before. Things other people wouldn't understand or for that matter believe me at all. Its hard for someone to tell you that your full of shit when they haven't even experienced anything like it before. Just my personal experience thats all.
aidsbrigade I don't ask people to for the very same reason. But i respect you as well because everyone is different we don't all have the same life you know.
aidsbrigade thanks
Ive experienced something paranormal like what I believe youve experienced Vanessa and I cant say I believe or disbelieve this investigation yet, I just have to experience it to make sense of it. I know that many people dont understand it, its like anything really. A mental illness can only be assumed by someone who hasnt experienced its severity, Its called having a small mind. We should be glad, we have been enlightened. People can go out and experience sky diving, eating from 3 star restaurants riding camels in the dessert, swimming with sharks, an overdose on drugs, sex with countless people and they will still not understand what its like to have seen something like this. Those examples were a bit extreme but I hope you can understand what I mean. Though I dont broadcast what ive seen anymore because people laugh at it I like to hear the stories of others.
Paul Sack I understand where your coming from. I to don't like to talk about things that ive seen of course because people always try to find an explanation for everything. Thats not how it works though like i said everyones life is very different i never thought of it as a curse or anything just unusual. Thank you for sharing
I like the feeling of not being the only one.
I experienced living with a poltergeist, it started to attach itself to my nephew , the most frightening experience, everything you don’t believe, voices, whispering, levitation, projectile vomiting, wardrobes opening and clothes being thrown out! All apparently brought on by having tarot cards and spirits being brought into the house through spiritual readings.
gods how does janet restrain herself from flying at the condescending woman and clawing her face
@aidsbrigade no she's probably used to twats calling her a liar
aidsbrigade,...Janet is not a liar. Nor is she an admitted liar. Agreeing that she attempted to fake activity, does not make her a liar. Quite the opposite, in fact.
aidsbrigade,...in what way would that be? She's a liar because you don't believe her,...is that it?
She’s used to skeptics
@@stuartcertain6363
My dear Stuart, I'm going to tell you one thing:
We must go through the darkest tunnel; but if you take my hand and walk with me, we will come out unharmed, heading for paradise.
If you refuse my help, you will inevitably succumb.
Eve can't exist without Adam, and Adam is alone without Eve. You know it. Be courageous at the right moment and don't disobey me.
'Deus Vult'
I think Janet is telling the truth.
And that skeptical person, I hope all kinds if poltergeist will haunt you.
I believe Janet 100%, I've had paranormal experiences before. That skeptic is extremely rude and arrogant, glad Janet put her in her place. She has no right to call Janet a liar she wasn't there.
She was a liar it’s been proven baby
@@jeremyjolly3645You think what you want but I believe her.
I believe her all the way. I know she was honest and never seemed fame
What an idiot you are
I am NOT a skeptic, but a believer in the paranormal. I'm also a realist. I've been watching all of the information and documentaries and interviews with these figures, Janet, Fairplay, the photographers, and their stories change. Not moderately, but significantly. Fairplay says in the documentary he was introduced to the case by a man who'd gone to hear him lecture who asked his help. In this interview, Fairplay says he saw one of the investigators giving an interview on the local news and didn't want to miss the opportunity. To compound that, with regard to Janet appearing on the dresser, the photographer states in the documentary that Janet had been heavily sedated "Enough to knock out an elephant" but fought and battled them so hard it too multiple adults to restrain her in bed even still, and upon leaving the room they turned to find her atop the dresser. In another interview with Miss Goldman, he doesn't mention her being sedated at all and claims they head no footsteps or floorboard creaks and went upstairs on a routine check and found her on the dresser. It isn't difficult to remember facts of such extraordinary occurrence, but these parties seem to misremember or rewrite far to much for me to be comfortable with their recollections.
"but a believer in the paranormal. I'm also a realist." I should use this joke
Sounds like most of the witnesses were influenced by an array of different information and misinformation, which affected their perception and understanding of the events they witnessed... the misinformation held by the witnesses, is especially responsible for polluting and tainting the witness perceptions and recollections of the events! Which basically makes it extremely difficult (if not impossible) to determine the what side of each story is real and valid! Total bummer! But it’s still really neat to hear the victim speak of her experiences, cuz experiences aren’t about fact, it’s what she felt and saw and heard, what she experienced, regardless of what witnesses did or didn’t see/understand/believe... and although many people may lie about this sort of thing, I really think Janet is being honest!
Its Playfair not fairplay. You cant even get the name right, so why would anyone listen to your silly opinion.
Phaylen Fairchild read Guy’s book then tell us it’s not real. Also I would be more suspicious if their stories were the same because if you have a group in a room watching something play out in front of them. Each person will remember different things. Why is that do you think? Because we are individuals and we see, hear, smell, touch everything in our own way.
Phaylen Fairchild I believe it because she has nothing to gain .plus my cousin was in school when a chair was lifted a flung at a teacher who was telling her off for being late .to many people including police saw objects moving .the story does not change I don't understand why your saying it is .your welcome to your opinion which is totally wrong of course
"we'll have to leave it there" ...just when they're all starting to get into proper debate.
Daytime magazine show, innit
This lady is very disrespectful like she is 'better' than anyone else. Very disrespectful. Unless you LIVE thru it, will you truly believe in it. Maybe this lady needs an experience of her own...or does that have to be in a 'controlled environment' as well?? 😒
Cat Rowe agree. I hate people like that. She was speaking from basically what she learned as if she was reading from a book and not personally at all. I bet she was paid to debunk the fact this is a true story and not any child should ever have to experience. I have a paranormal past as well and it was terrifying but thank Jesus Christ no where near The Enfield Poltergeist story
"Holly has left the Studio so she can't see or hear anything."
Lolololololol!!
I TOTALLY believe Janet. My heart goes out to her and ALL the trauma she has been through. Much less the ridicule from completely close minded ignorant disrespectful fools as this woman is. SHAME ON HER...!!!
Janet comes across being very honest and seems genuinely believable about her experiences as a child. However listening to her speaking I do think these experiences have not necessarily left her mentally intact (and I honestly say this with compassion.)
The skeptic woman is rude and arrogant.
I couldn't believe that women
I absolutely believe what happened to this family, as a child back in the late 70s we had a poltergeist in our house that tormented us for years , things would be thrown around , doors slamming, my bed would shake violently and I was even thrown down the stairs, so much happened there's too much to mention. Needless to say my parents eventually sold the house after years of suffering.
After moving to a new built house all the negativity ceased but did get visitations that were comforting.
I have had spirits around me all my life and strange occurrences In all three houses my wife and myself have owned but nothing really negative like my parents first house. watching the series of the Enfield poltergeist bought back a few memories I would rather forget, what his woman and her family went through as a child was much worse than what we went through and can imagine how this has affected her life.
Me, I'm always expecting something to happen when I enter a room on my own even now.
What bollocks
You know nothing
@@darrendavis927 guarantee you can’t prove anything and the current inhabitants of the house will claim nothing weird ever happened
Who cares what you believe? It's not a matter of what you or anyone else believes. It believes in you
@@SkinCareLuver wtf does that even mean
Ha Ha!! At 11:30 "we were trying to record using a video tape; trying to get some action... in the bedroom". Jimmy Saville look out!!
nipty bipty pretty funny
nipty bipty I had the same thought. lol
nipty bipty ha ha
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🐸😷😷😷😷😷🐇👺👺👺👺👺💀💀🐰🐰🍭🍬👮🍬🍭🍬😢👮
I believe her. Anything is possible.
Even that you won't believe in fuckin ghosts like a little boy ? :D
Lo que tu digas crack
Aidsbrigade shut your mouth i believe her I totally agree with her she is right ghost are exit our world don't insult her
the stage lights are flickering on and off during Janet's interview! Spirit went with Janet to interview.
Ahahahahahaha you silly silly man.
what i s your point Woodie?
why? what was I missing?
lia exlemus 1. Why am I a geek?? lol. 2. It's **you're**. IDIOT. I'm also perfectly calm thank you. It comes with the territory of being a rational, sensible thinker. So YOU'RE the one who should probably calm down! :D
lia exlemus you sad pathetic witch lolol
She has my respect by talking about it
Can I just say Hi to the people currently living in that house. Sweet dreams lol.
@aidsbrigade prove it?
aidsbrigade fuck me you really are sad aren’t you 😂😂😂Imagine pitting all this effort and spending your time replying to all of these comments that are against what you ‘believe’😂freak of nature you critter.
I certainly wouldn't have been able to come up with 'brain hemorrhage' at 11 years old
aidsbrigade,
Strange response from you......you, who has cast aspersions upon the girls regarding their intelligence.
You reveal yourself to be a shape-shifting demon, when you want to be. You cannot be trusted with any point, you make.
Janet has awe-inspiring courage and I am saddened by the ignorance she must have faced growing up in stiff-upper Briton in the 70's. Indeed, and just to clarify to any skeptic watching this footage, it was NOT and NEVER the norm for anyone to speak candidly about paranormal happenings, not least the media in its then stuffy and unexciting infancy.
I believe that poor woman about every thing she is saying and the old man .But this is just a nother level of direspect .
Closed-minded, bigoted sceptics like Hyde really annoy me. There's no doubt in my mind that these phenomena are absolutely real.
Listen.. with all do respect to all parties of this conversation. Simply put.. if you're a skeptic you HAVE TO go out there and prove to yourself nothing weird is going on. Put in the effort..at-least 30 days/nights in a haunted house, such as the Amityville or conjuring house or else you're not worth listening to on national television. You're just judging a obviously, far-fetched story from a distance, you're not the one spending great parts of your life investigating murder houses trying to gather proof of the most mysterious phenomena known to man-kind. I'd take great offense if a skeptic was NOT there with me to experience these things, just judging the story after not even putting in an effort to find the real, truth.
aidsbrigade then that's the skeptics problem. There are still many events of unexplained phenomena happening all over the world. There is proof look up the extended trailer to 'sir noface.'
aidsbrigade well duh but it's the first government sanctioned paranormal investigation that promises definitive proof that ghosts exist. So you'll have to wait until it comes out.
Is that really ur picture
You are everywhere Oo
aidsbrigade had it right the first time, no matter how unfortunate his name is. You can't just claim any insane thing and then say to sceptics "Prove to me it's NOT real! You can't!" Nobody can prove that anything isn't real, it's not possible.
Janet still looks terrified to this day...
+aidsbrigade wow ... you just don't stop! I've been reading through the comment thread & you have replied to almost every comment. Pretty time consuming. Why is it so important to you to be on this thread spouting off your bs? Give it a rest & go do your own research rather than asking everyone else for 'proof'! Go find a skeptic site so you can rattle off with other close-minded individuals! ;-)
+aidsbrigade ccccllllloooooooossssseeddd mindeeeeeeed
that poor 'skeptic' woman: she's hopeless. janet is great.
Janet could write a fascinating book about what happened to her. Although, I can understand why she wouldn't want to. Respect for coming on the show.
pat squires
1 second ago
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
@@patsquires3654 Even the investigators at the time acknowledged the girls faked some of the activity. I mean, it happened over a year, so I'd be surprised if they didn't. The book written by one of the investigators is well worth a read.
What a horrible cow when that woman has been through all of that I hope she gets her day
If something traumatic happens you will remember it down to the last detail. For example if you saw a 70(ish) year old man with long grey hair, crawling across the road without a shirt or shoes on wearing light brown homemade pants while driving on a one lane country road,you are about to ask him if he needs help he looks up into your car window with black eyes and says nothing..you will remember that. I don't agree with the "not remembering" I often hear when it comes to these kinds of answers given to people who have had an encounter of some type.
"Long-term" memory involves hard-wiring of pathways in the brain based on real experiences. Replaying the events through those pathways may in fact consolidate the recollection. Suggestion, however powerful, eventually fades and becomes an incoherent jumble of facts because it does not involve such pathways.
العاب
The Enfield case is highly interesting, of course. There were undoubtedly weird goings on. Many agree now that Maurice Grosse and Guy Playfair, whilst being very caring and sensitive, went into the case looking for answers to their own beliefs. Confirmation bias was definitely there. Janet seems very disturbed as an adult and I have a great deal of sympathy for her and everything she's had to deal with. The investigators put her through a rigorous sequence of experiences. The poor girl didn't stand a chance.
RIP Guy Lion Playfair, respect to you !
I believe you, Janet. You are far too scarred by these experiences. It is very unfortunate that you were picked on by such a malevolent spirit. I hope that you have healed from these experiences and have gotten on well in your life. You don't need such sensational scrutiny anymore.
+james woody well said.
Well said and looking at her demeanour whilst being interviewed I don't think so.
I see your persistence in not seeing it and your expectations will never occur in the way you want it to.
Reread my posts aidsbrigade in relation to the lights, one must always look to logic and the mundane first. I have had undeniable experience aidsbrigade of survival and if that upsets you so be it.
Nope I am here unfortunately but describe myself as a spirit with a body. We survive death aidsbrigade, not matter what you think.
ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTED WITH THIS POOR EXCUSE OF A CYNIC.
This Debra woman what an arrogant pratt. She talks about historically, but two of the people involved are there!. She quotes that the SPR said it was a hoax yetone of the members of the SPR is next to her telling her that is wrong,. Skeptics are great at putting their own version into things they never witness.
janet seems disturbed etc even now
If the camera was there all the time filming, then it would have pictured how she got to flying from her bed. Id like to see that footage.
It took pictures every 4-5 seconds
You must be Millennial cameras were not like todays they had seconds between frames back then.
@@honeybadger9425 millenials, boomers oh come on!! Didn't we learn anything from Germany 1933 back then?? Putting people in a certain category because they were born in a certain time frame? Like that is normal. Hitler did the same back then. Just see everyone as an individual.
@@desdes1822 Oh please spare me the left wing PC BS im talking about how a camera worked back which obviously the majority of millenials wont know about and if that offends you i dont care.
It was a jump
Janet thinking "fuck I look so stupid now"
I just watched the original television interview special (30+ minutes). The camera set up wasn't a video camera or continuous but a still photo cam set to take pictures at intervals. I believe it was set only for motion like a wildlife camera in the girls bedroom. Also, watching the original interview with the girls, Janet can be seen taking an intake of breath as the voice continues constant. I have yet to see a ventriloquist ever be able to do that. Both girls are able to talk over the voice as well. I've (my family ) used to experience low level paranormal activity. When we were going through buying our house from having rented it for years, it was a slightly stressful time for my parents and we used to hear heavy footsteps going up and down the hall. We used to joke it was my mom's deceased father making sure we were okay and assuring us we were doing the right thing going through with the mortgage. After the paperwork was done, no more footsteps. My sister and I once woke at the same time to see a green mist humanoid shaped apparition, see through and about 3 1/2 feet tall with a large head standing by our gerbil cage inspecting them. Just watching, and we watched it until it disappeared and we went back to sleep. Didn't know we were both awake and saw the same thing till the next morning. My sister was like 12 and I was about 10. Once we caught a tiny flash of light in a dark room on my old video camera I used to mess with, so we turned the lights on and looked for a possible source but found none. I may have been older than 15, maybe 17. I think I'll look to see if I still have that video. Hope I didn't record over it. Other slightly weird stuff, minor things, none of which ever scared us. But I've never been afraid of "scary" movies.
So I have no reason to think this family didn't go through something paranormal and traumatic.
sorry but i tried today and managed to do the voice in a deep tone it was VERY VERY easy
@@patsquires3654 coz u not am 11 year old girl
@@patsquires3654what for hours on end 🙄🙄
And?
Sad this is exactly why Janet doesn't do interviews smh how dare that lady radical Janet's story 😔
pat squires
1 second ago
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ?
She seems really uncomfortable i think she has been traumatized
You only have to look at the face to know how much stress she’s still under with it .
That's probably why she doesn't want to be interviewed, that woman was just straight out saying they were faking.. She was kind enough to do the interview and they did exactly the thing and reason she doesn't do them....
I do believe Janet’s home was possibly encountering something paranormal but I also believe that some of it was the kids playing around when nothing was happening !
I think you are right. Kids will do that, especially if it gets them attention. The problem is though, it then puts into question everything else that supposedly happened!! I personally just don't know what to believe. Wish I did!!
My dad was in her class at school, he said it would follow her to school and stuff would happen and several times she would run out the class crying.
I'm jealous. Did you get to hear many of those stories growing up?
Yeah quite a few, my nan still lives on the next street to where it all happened. I drive by the house on my way to the train station. I find it so interesting!
lamb92
Me, too! I love hearing stories by people that were around the time things happened...and just to know your nan lives near it and you can drive by the real house? I envy you!! It sounds exciting!
ssky3s Yeah its just an ordinary house now with other people living in it, i dont know wether they know about its history though lol
an amazingly courageous woman, Janet.
At 6:12 the lamp behind the poltergeist expert increases in brightness for a split second after he answers his belief on the supernatural.
No way was this a hoax. An overwhelming number of credible, impartial witnesses for one; members of the police, press, neighbours went on record to say what they witnessed.
The lollipop lady who worked the crossing for the school opposite (Janet's school) saw Janet levitating around the room through the bedroom window, from the street!
I've seen Janet interviewed over the years, and, as others have pointed out, she doesn't come across as a sensationalist or liar.
I believe every word, and I think it's insulting of that 'expert' to contradict her account of what took place and left her and her family traumatised.
It’s a proven hoax dummy
she fixed her teeth!
they gain any money , in fact the happening almost destroyed the life of the family . (do some research before you talk shit)
aidsbrigade just do some resarch , thats how i knew . they kept living in that house ( so no house gaining) , they were remembered has the "wierd family" (social exclusion ) and they also were offended and critisised from people like you that tougth it was a hoax . So if it was a hoax (wich a doubt it , mainly because the lorraine couple stated that it was a case of demonic possession) it wouldnt be a hoax with the purpuse of economic benefit , and theres no point of doing a hoax that big just for the fun ...
+aidsbrigade You are sounding bitter now and it is unbecoming. Their family was poor and living in a council house that they did not own. The people that came in to investigate were not paid by this family as she was a single mother not making much money. Now the guy who is an author, writing about it. What the fuck did you expect him to do? He is a writer of paranormal phenomenon. That is one of the reasons his expertise was valued to begin with. This situation did more damage to this family than it did anything to profit them. Of course she fixed her fucking teeth. She is not still eleven. She grew the fuck up and made changes in her life as we all do. If you do not believe in the paranormal fine, I can respect that. Just stop behaving like a mad cap bitch about something you know nothing about.
Probably had braces fitted through the NHS when in her teens like most kids with goofy teeth.
Shavenhamster
Thank you! Aidsbrigade is sounding really ridiculous. Of course she got her teeth fixed and more than likely by the NHS. TO expect this woman at 50 to be and look the same as the girl at 11 is just dumb.
I'm sorry but to all the people saying she "faked it" you're TOTALLY wrong
you CANNOT fake something for that fucking long and get away with it, maybe if you're the Government sure, but not just a regular simple family in the 70's, and look at them, clearly none have the intelligence to pull something like that off. And even if they did fake it, 30 years later I'd be getting sick of telling the same story, and the family never got any money, support or anything, just the label of "that weird family" totally not worth faking it if you ask me.
Ever considered that it's the reporters and the psychical researchers who faked it? Oddly there is no video footage, even though such technology was readily available at the time.
A family in the early part of the twentieth century faked some photos of fairies, and carried on insisting they were real until the 1980s, when they finally admitted to how they had done it.
Look up James Randi and Steve bannachek, in the 80s they fooled scientists for about 4 years into believing they were psychic. There was another guy, can't remember his name with Steve. James was just in the background monitoring.
The two girls were the only witness to the fares are you calling all the people who had anything to do with this case liars.
Prick
kempouk so let me get this straight, you just jumped to some insane conclusion and called someone a name over the internet, for no reason, how mature are you? lol grow up.
I completely agree with the haunting. This skeptic is just a fool with no idea what went on in that house. I’ve followed this story for years including watching the original spoof documentary on BBC’s called Ghost Watch. I was a little girl when watching the spoof with my sisters and cousin sisters trying to find a comfortable space so we could all go to sleep without fear. In the spoof, Sarah green was trapped in the basement in the end. Woke up early to see if Sarah green would appear on Saturday live.
Im an absolute sceptic, but there do seem to be eye witnesses including the police. Fascinating.
1 second ago
please watch the bbc interview with the 2 girls, they both slip up, when asked whats it like to live in a haunted house, janet says its NOT really haunted, her older sister smiles and says shut up janet, she then does the ghost voice and tells a knock knock joke, its so obviously fake its almost embarrissing , i am not saying its all fake but the voice is without doubt a hoax, so the question is how much of the rest of the story is hoax ? the police statement is very intreasting as both police officers see the chair move and conduct tests to make sure there is no trickery involved ?
Im just a random internet guy but i once experienced something i was not able to explain till this day
What is it
I genuinely believe this story to be true. 👍
I have a niece. When she was in her preteens, just about Janet's age... her voice was changing. Just for fun or out of habit... she would periodically talk with this deep, low tone raspy voice-- quite similar to the voice of this poltergeist. So, the whole claim that a young girl couldnt possibly make those sounds is just rubbish. Secondly... am I to believe that a dead person who finds themselves miraculously rejoined with the living-- a feat so rare, it must be as shocking to them as it is to us... decides to use this fleeing opportunity to pull-off a few juvenal pranks? Throwing Legos, flipping chairs, telling half-baked 'knock-knock' jokes and banging on walls? The whole thing sounds like a trivial waste. It would be like Aliens finally visiting Planet Earth-- only to spend their time working the weekend shift at Petco.
"And John Barrowman is here after the break"
What a contrast.
He's more terrifying than the poltergeist 👻 😆
@@linzianna It's just the contrast. To go from spooky to total camp. 😂
I would love to see Katie Hopkins' take on this!
Man this aidsbrigade dude really got nothing better to do with their life LMAO
Don't say that!... One of you is bad enough, for this century.
Shit,......I broke out in a sweat there!
'aidsbrigade,'
Just joking. There is nothing about you that concerns me.
If name calling and insinuations were a game show; you'd win hands down.
However, when it comes to this case.....nah!
this is like the 5th video ive seen him/her commenting on. lol..i find it highly entertaining. More so than the actual videos lol.
'Adalynn Vargas',
Don't encourage him...He's a menace.
aidsbrigade by all means...continue..tis your right as a free citizen of the world...i just find it entertaining is all. Especially seeing the back and forth with in the commenters.
the way janet talk really freaks the hell outta me
+aidsbrigade go to sleep deborah! go to sleep!
Okay - actually her accent and speech are pretty much nondescript for an English woman, there is nothing weird there.