@@charalargenumber8327 Yes exactly, not just a trade but then afterwards you can take his knight with your bishop and king can't take because of your queen. So even if the opponent doesn't fall for the bait and take your rook with his rook, you'd still be sacrificing your rook for both his rook and knight. It would be a 2 for 1. I think I saw that right.
lmao love this
casual 500 well done
You gotta account the fact that he isn't forced to take, nevertheless good job
it forces a trade though which is good for the side with a material advantage (I know I'm sounding like the "aghtually" meme)
@@charalargenumber8327 Yes exactly, not just a trade but then afterwards you can take his knight with your bishop and king can't take because of your queen. So even if the opponent doesn't fall for the bait and take your rook with his rook, you'd still be sacrificing your rook for both his rook and knight. It would be a 2 for 1. I think I saw that right.
@@ThatOneWeirdGal Ke2 Rxd1 Rxd1 and the knight isn't lost
@@charalargenumber8327 Oh, didn't catch that, good one!