Labour Leadership Ask Me Anything - Jeremy Corbyn
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Jeremy Corbyn answers questions from the other three candidates to be Labour leader during LBC's Labour Leadership Debate.
Subscribe to LBC: bit.ly/Subscrib...
LBC: Leading Britain's Conversation
DAB Digital Radio Nationwide | 97.3FM FM London
"what is ambition? is it to run things or try and change things? brilliiant response!
***** The guy has never had a Lemonade stand let alone a corner shop he is ECONOMICALLY ILLITERATE!......
He is a walking talking caricature of Carl Marx..... Jesus.
finalfrontier001 Running a business and an economy are two very different things requiring different skills: governments aren't run for profit.
Dylius01
"government aren't run for profit"
"Running a business and an economy are two different things"
Excuse me??....... Wow just wow to think people have the audacity to write shit like this...WOW!!
There are TROLLS and then there THIS!!
finalfrontier001 What a coherent rebuttal! Thank you for showing me the error of my ways.
finalfrontier001 ..Jesus is still the most influential man in history,you uneducated buffoon.
Yvette Cooper makes me sick. What is the point of voting labour if their policies are the same as the conservatives?
Because Labour is leftwing now under corbyn
It helps when you are interviewing someone if you let them answer for more than 5 seconds without interrupting them. If I had been treated so disrespectfully I would have thrown something at the smug interviewers face.
Hope you see this! But it’s laughable when Dale asked which leadership positions Corbyn had held, when Dale himself ran for MP and wasn’t voted in! A position Corbyn still holds (even technically atm).
I want Corbyn for leader, and Watson for deputy, but I want Watson on the dispatch box (is that what it is?) Watson is fucking razor sharp
Dan Clements You should be ashamed.
legaliseme the ultimate dream team!
legaliseme What on Earth do you mean? Watson on the despatch box? The only people that speak on the despatch box are senior cabinet ministers. Corbyn, will speak there if he is leader, Watson (whoever that is) will speak there if he is a senior cabinet member.
DukeOfWellington Tom Watson is a candidate for deputy leader of the party, and will probably get some sort of cabinet position even if he does not get deputy.
DukeOfWellington Tom Watson is running for deputy leader and is also being supported by unison and most of the major unions as he is well linked to the trade unions, from what i have seen he is very much a front runner.
I actually changed my mind since my original comments and instead voted for Stella Creasy for deputy because frankly i think with her on the front lines against the tories she would be able to get young women in the ballot box voting labour, shes pretty good in front of a camera and has a talent for the zingers
First politician i've seen actually answer a question for a long time. Most of them just talk in circles and don't address a thing.
Blitzar Zero Jeremy Corbyn wants to increase the expand the benefit system and delay the deficit budget to 20 and 30 years more. The question is are you on with that??
finalfrontier001 What's the point in having no deficit but a shithole of a country?
Serpent0fEden
Spending ore and printing money ....... SUICIDE!!! basics of economics.
+finalfrontier001 so like selling RBS for a billion less than we paid for it? Trickle down economics does not work.
Serpent0fEden
Nope we sale it for 765 million and that is at much as we can get out of it before the price fell. We are gonna use that money on the debt reduction. Are debt is 1.5 TRILLION!!! our liability DEBT is approximately 20 TRILLION!!!!
.....and Jeremy Corbyn wants to EXPAND the BENEFIT SYSTEM!?!?!?
We are not facing problems we have fastest growing economy in Europe out of the G7 this year plus more jobs and unemployment overall falling. We are in HEAVEN!!
You want to see REAL AUSTERITY go to GREECE where they are gonna start TAXING BREATHING AIR!!
I pissed myself when Corbyn responded saying 'can I finish?.. do you mind my friend?' in the coolest manner possible.
May help if you spell his name correctly
***** Ehm, on spelling 'hear hear'
Myra Cecilia Hear here
James Chambers here hare here
James Chambers Here here!
Don't think so he's still a prat how ever you spell it.
The Labour party focus should NOT be on clawing back the ex labour voters that turned to the Tory's this year, their focus should be on winning the trust of the 75% that didn't vote Conservative in the last election!!
Vote Corbyn!!
Disgraceful LBC, disgraceful. It doesn't take much to spell a man's name correctly.
Hahaha! So disrespectful.
Neil Rasserer I know, they missed out the comrade.
Neil Rasserer Fucking get over yourself.
Yvette cooper sounds so condescending when she speaks to other people.
TheIdiotBoxUK nice legs, shame abooooot every thing else
+fookdatchit why, just why?
She was right...
Watching this, it makes the events of December become crystal clear.
Watching this in 2017 at the verge of the snap general elections, and even in this short period, Corbyn has acted upon most of the things he set out to do within the party, transformed the nature of the party, increased the membership, made the party more democratic and collectively created this radical progressive manifesto we can be proud of.
But made Labour unelectable 😂
@@thomasnorton4610 not really
"What is ambition? Is it to control things or to change things?" - Jeremy Corbyn.
I think 'managing' would be a better word than 'controlling'. Jeremy wants to have a go at changing the existing system rather than just managing it. Yvette Cooper asks Jeremy if he wants to be Prime Minister. He says yes but is not really convincing. He sees his mission as being to shift the party and the national debate. And yet all the candidates Jeremy is actually the only one with a chance of winning the 2020 General Election (or, more realistically, getting enough seats so that he can form a coalition with the SNP and LibDems) but he knows that it's more important to shift people's consciousness than to win and govern with no clear direction. He is the signpost that Mhairi Black was asking for in her maiden speech and should he win the Labour leadership he would form a very effective alliance of opposition with the SNP. His only problem would be the right wing of his own party. Erm, why am I suddenly thinking of Game of Thrones and Jon Snow bringing the Wildlings across the Wall?
***** Troll alert.
***** Just looked on your profile page,Troll of the highest order,also a racist Troll.
I know about rightwing Ambition, it controls change. Think about it......
Gavin Sealey What is the old saying, Gavin?" He who feels unfit to wear the crown is best placed to handle it." Please forgive my terrible paraphrasing. But, you are right. Your assessment is bang on in my eyes. Corbyn feels it is better to loose on principle than to win with someone else's identity and beliefs. Opposition can influence and interfere in Government. Look at the SNP recently. They almost single handedly prevented the Tories from reintroducing hunting. This Government has a majority of twelve in the house. A powerful opposition can influence policy and decision making almost as entirely as a pressed, small majority.
Brian McTaggart Massive thumbs up to you mate.
This man is our only hope.
So do Right wing ones.
Out of curiosity out of everything in Jeremy's campaign so far, what do you think will do the most harm?
Danny Atkinson For a third term>?
Danny Atkinson It's not about left or right wing. It's about what's right for the country. Unfortunately the electorate hasn't figured that out yet and still vote along ideological line.
Nathan-John Hughes Change is on the horizon
Bernie Sanders in USA and Jeremy Corbyn in UK would be an interesting global direction
I don't care he he not able to run a tap. This man could bring about real change for the working and middle classes😊
Maybe, rather than 'Leading' Britain's conversation, you could allow Britain's conversation to develop organically.
About the employment thing:
Whenever unemployment comes down, even if only very slightly, it sounds like really good news.
It's great that productive forces in the economy are growing, and that there'll be a little bit more money in people's pockets.
But if one gets a little more ambitious about human potential, then the picture starts to become darker than governments make out.
Unemployment, generally means being out of work. But let's coin a new word: Misemployment.
It means being in work, but of a kind that fails to tackle with any sincerity the true needs of other people, merely exciting them to unsatisfactory pleasures and desires instead the way Primark, Patek Philippe, or YouPorn might. An employee of these businesses is Misemployed.
Similarly, A man who is employed by a casino in Las Vegas to hand out flyers in order to tempt them to go inside and use slot machines is clearly employed in the technical sense and is marked as being off the unemployment registers. He's paid a wage in return for helping to solve a small part of the puzzle of the human condition that is of interest to his employers: that not enough tourists might otherwise leave the blue skies and heat of the main street to enter the air-conditioned halls of an Egyptian-themed casino. The man is clearly employed, but he is also dramatically, in truth, misemployed. His labour is generating capital, but it's making no contribution to human welfare and flourishing.
He is joined in the ranks of misemployment by the people who make cigarettes, addictive but sterile television shows (such as soaps), badly designed buildings, ill fitting and shoddy clothes, deceptive advertisements, artery-clogging biscuits and highly sugared drinks.
The rate of misemployment in modern economies is very high. While we may be genuinely grateful of the job we're given, we are all in the back of our minds, as employees, hoping for something else: that our work can contribute, in some way, to the common good, that we can make a modest difference. Governments have, with some success, learning techniques to reduce the rate of overall unemployment. In the language of the field, they do this by 'stimulating demand'.
Though technically effective, this method fails to draw any distinction between good and bad demand and, therefore, between employment and misemployment.
The real trick to bringing down misemployment isn't just to stimulate demand per se, but to stimulate the right sort of demand. To invite people to buy the ingredients of true satisfaction, to want the things that really matter, and therefore give individuals and business a chance to direct their labour, and make profits in meaningful areas of the economy. Employment figures aren't irrelevant, they matter a great deal: they're the first things to be attended to.
But these figures mask a more ambitious index that we should get around to building in the future. One that measures misemployment and, hence, shows how intelligently and responsibly we're deploying human capital. Or rather: how we're using up people's lives.
***** I think that, ultimately, the solution is to make education free. When we remove the price tag from education, we make it more accessible. We are free to return to university to retrain, or to study whatever it was that interested us as we grew up.
A lot of people wanted to be something other than they are, but the idea of the cost of re-education is an obstacle many cannot overcome and, so, they end up in places like McDonalds.
But what about the economic burden of free education? In actual fact, surprisingly, an economy is boosted when education is free. Unemployment goes down - and could disappear completely - when everyone is able to do what they really desire, rather than whatever circumstance dictates they should do to survive. Creativity and Industry go up, more money goes into the economy as a result and everyone is able to live a higher standard of life.
And it's becoming ever more important that we look at how to deal and eliminate misemployment because the age of automation is almost upon us and, as it stands, that simply means people will be displaced, and that unemployment and poverty will increase as 'misemployment' positions are gradually automated.
Mycroft Wells That's an interesting point and very close to the truth. Speaking honestly that is exactly how things are for me. My story is I completed my Masters degree in the field of computing, I specialised in a wide variety of internal subjects (as well as gaining external certifications) to make myself as employable as possible. When I graduated I worked as a back end coder for well known e-commerce site's. I know around the year 2012 (possibly the market crash? cuts in public sector jobs?) something changed enormously in the job market. Despite my experience I could not get a job even remotely in my field. I then worked as an outside contractor which sustained me for awhile, but then that became difficult too.
I was left jobless for 4 months (it was sheer hell), and anyone who has been through that knows how it effects confidence. I gave up looking for a job in my field and got a job with Primark, it certainly paid the bills and if anything made me realise how many people were in the same desperate situation to me and did exactly the same thing. Perfectly intelligent graduates who are trying to get into industries that are over flowing and closing the door. I am now back in my preferred sector and it took me quite a long time to find a company to allow me that chance again.
My point of view is that we are very ill equipped to deal with the routes young people choose to take in employment. Misemployment certainly pays the bills but it is dangerous too, but as I found out, it's almost near impossible to return to a sector which you needed to abandon for awhile for the sake of financial stability. I would like future governments to work closer with education institutes and look to supply the demand of graduates through public sector business initiatives. I do think the government neglects the intellectual wealth our country has and instead resorted to a system of simply supplying the demand what private companies deem necessary. To fit the metaphor; square pegs in round holes.
Mycroft Wells I think you sound like an utter Puritan. It's those simple pleasures that make life more bearable.
James Burton Only if your life is shit and dull.
So you are saying that the majority of men's lives are shit and dull? No wonder no one listens to you.
Sorry Jeremy but just writing something down as a "human right" doesn't stop it from being rationed. Economics 101 failed again
***** The rich in this country have seen their wealth grow enormously while public services having been cut over the last few years. The money is there.
Szaam Wait so you want others people money based on something you cannot prove or achieve.... Sounds like a socialist to me whihc means economic illiteracy
Szaam There will always be healthcare rationing so long as it is in control of government- no matter how much money they throw at the problem. Jeremy is naively idiotic for thinking that declaring healthcare to be a human right will solve this.
Fucking hell LBC, at least try to be subtle about it. What a pathetic, sneering interview. Let the man speak.
No bias from the LBC then...
He doesn't seem to understand basic economics. You can't just increase the minimum wage and expect nothing to change. It's all about supply and demand. Increasing the minimum wage will mean there needs to be either more demand for workers in an economy or less supply of labour to reach an equilibrium on the price mechanism. More tax on corporations, raising the top rate of income tax and pro-union rhetoric means less investment from transnational enterprises, so less demand for labour. Point being the supply of labour will shrink and there'll be more unemployment.
Jake Wrightson Fantastic statement.
Jake Wrightson Also those countries are western countries that are sparsely populate with rich natural resources. In addition, the demand for labour created by these natural resources and other factors leads to the supply of labour being unable to meet the demand, therefore wages are higher to attract more people into these positions and skilled immigrants are needed to fill the gaps.
Good luck Jeremy , I wish you all the best
Last time I checked Germany, Denmark, and many other developed nations had a lower employment rate than that of Great Britain
Bob Hawke was leader of the Trade Unions in Australia He turned out to be one of the best, if not the best PM of Australia, ever, in the 80s. This red herring, 'you havn't run anything', was a catch phrase ,the Tories tossed on Anthony Albanese ,the current Labour PM. He is turning out to be a highly respected and accomplished PM ,Surely to be up there with Bob Hawke as history will tell
Good point made by Corbyn that's often forgotten: a lot of the people in this country are on zero hour contracts, which takes them off the unemployment figures. It doesn't translate however in to full time or even part time employment.
you can slag him off all you Like ...he as my Vote all day..if not i will not Vote
Labour,,,
thecobraman I am voting for him so he can DESTROY Labour. You are fucking delusional if you think the British public is going to vote him as Prime minister. Conservative and UKIP members are joining deliberately so they can vote for him on purpose.......... You sir, and Jeremy Corbyn are the BUTT of the JOKE!!
+thecobraman i havent voted since before tony blair but will vote for corbyn i vote for my party only when they are at least trying to do the right thing.
UglyhoodRAT - this comment doesn't age well :-D
Vote corbyn. To guarantee a tory government in for a third term.
Let the man speak
Oh! Jeremy Corbyn!
Why is the LBC presenter (who is supposed to be moderating the debate) getting involved? He is supposed to be impartial...
Oliver Bruce He is sir. He just asked Jeremy a basic question. If asking basic questions exposes and unravels your ideology apart i am not sure what i can say sir....... Maybe you need to do some soul searching.
finalfrontier001 5.22 he wasn't asking questions, just putting words in his mouth, and talking over him. Not impartial, it was supposed to be the other candidates asking questions wasn't it?
creativejani
He asked how credible he is and what experience does he have in economics and position. Jeremy became hostile like Ian was taking something away from him not even Nigel Farage is this hostile on basic questions.
Jeremy fell flat with no answer or lack luster ones.
finalfrontier001 I think he ignored a personal dig, it wasn't an impartial question more of a statement 'you haven't done anything' which is insulting. But I didn't see Jeremy get hostile. BTW what had Cameron done, or Blair, before becoming PM? We see what we look for.
creativejani
They did politic at university and their families ran businesses .....pretty credible and their have a conservative traditional free market stance on economics.
Jeremy Corbyn has never had lemonade stand let alone a corner shop!!
He is economically illiterate he is a walking talking caricature of Karl Marx...
He said he wants to reintroduce clause IV which to re-nationalize means public services..... Which would cost 180 billion alone let alone the cost to run year on year.
We have a deficit whihc is 90 billion and you want another 180 billion for what!?!??
The guy always says that we don't have to tackle the deficit until the next 20 years....OMFG!!
This is what he want to do;
Rise the Tax on the Rich
Print money like mad
And lend more money from foreign banks
Welcome to Socialism.
If asked again about what has he done before being prime minister: He has resisted his parties inclinations to turn against its principles, he has not deal with anyone and therefore has clean hands to take the wheels, he has seen first hand, 30 odd years of government policies that changed the country from left to right and centre. He has a clean conscious and a pounding healthy heart. That is all it takes my friends. And hopefully, 5 years being leader of the opposition.
Corbyn all the way
Good to see all the support for Corbyn online and hate of the tories. Can you please make sure to vote next time!
"one member one vote." How often and for how long did we hear that? They obviously forgot to add the clause "as long as you vote for who we want you to. "
Corbyn appears to be very complacent about the current deficit. His answers give the impression that having a continuous deficit is of secondary importance to welfare. Surely this is what the Greeks thought and now look at the trouble that they are in.
Lowest unemployment - 0 hours contact is not work. Sanctions removed from unemployed register. Sick & disabled not counted. Corbyn has a clear Labour vision. Rally nice to see someone who isn't driven by personal ambition but by the desire to help others. #JezWeCan
Can't believe how rude they are being to Corbyn. He has had a wider sphere of experience in politics than almost any MP in his 32 years in Parliament. He has learnt a lot! Compare this to other Labour politicians who are often put into positions of importance, with little or no knowledge of their subject. We should all support anyone who is genuine and decent, whichever party they are in. I hope it will be the end of right/left politics and the good people get together. That was created to divide people.
6:00 - Iain Dale couldn't give less of a shit that children are going hungry.
You know there is a very easy way to massively reduce unemployment, get rid of the minimum wage.
TAX TAX TAX
is the labour way
Wow, he has changed so much, for the better.
The radio presenter was doing most of the debating with JC when it should have been the other candidates backing up the points raised by there own questions.
he has my vote
He was asked "What qualifies him to be Prime Minister?" Well, the answer that question will be the number of people that will vote for him. If the British people don't want him, they wont vote for him. I believe that the British people will vote for him.
When I listen to Liz Kendal, I see Britain's answer to Sarah Palin.
he wants to be the leader of the labour party and a labour prime minister; the rest want to be the leader of the labour party and a tory prime minister.
corbyn's voice sounds eerily like tony benn in this interview
The trouble with British radio talk shows is that they are dominated by Tory broadcasters.
I wonder what she is thinking now she and her mates who under mind this man and have contributed to the mess we are in now I won’t be voting labour ever again with her in it
What's with JC voice??
Labour is a party that has always stood for helping those who aren't well off, never have I doubted the sincerity of the intentions of people who support labour. But, this approach has an inherent problem within which is it takes responsibility away from people, it implies that the situations people find themselves in, financial or otherwise (on a large scale), are not the result of how they have chosen to live their lives. It's this sort of thinking that has led to a general mindset of entitlement about people, like somehow it is the governments responsibility to ensure they have high living standards, rather than there own. I reject the notion of collectivist thinking, though I admire Corbyn' sticking to his values.
There are now more Labour supporters because of JC than the other three all put together.
"They're closer to France than George Osbourne"
So that means it's legitimate to say they're the same? Are all policies that are closer to Corbyn's position equal to Corbyn's?
go corbyn
Bear solutions for labour leader! Check out his blunt ted battle
I don't think calling into question someones capability to be a prime minister is even relevant. Lets look at the qualifications of previous prime ministers shall we. Bare faced liar - NO. War monger in the pockets of the US - NO. Covertly assist big business to take advantage of the populous - No. Paedophile - No. Hey, in my book he has all the qualifications necessary. I'm in. Fresh new honest look that appeals to all decent people. Go Corbyn Go !!!
Once again, with the benefit of hindsight, if the other three candidates had been delivering a cohesive message, thus representing what their 'constituents' felt, they would have received the requisite number of votes! They didn't, and Mr Corbyn DID, that's 'democracy' in action, a concept that the other three would do well to relearn!
So softly spoken lady gets him to actually say he would like to be PM and then abrasive, rude host uses this as an 'in' to take the piss...
The fact that he is back bencher is great means he won't but himself forward just to get a promotion he will only stand up when he thinks its right
It's so obvious the guy in the seat is against JC, as for the rest of them they all follow the old right wing side of the party. Jeremy will win with his honesty.
I don't want to be elected. I hate the thought of being Prime Minister. It makes me sweat just to think of it. But the only way the Labour Party will get back into power is through me.
Looks like LBC were Corbanned from spelling his name right.
Someone has no shame really, after 'flipping' home three times and god knows what...Than ask somone to look into her eyes?
Corbyn rocks here
You're all bashing the host but these are questions that need answerin!
My god! I have heard a politician talking sense. Excuse me while I reel from the shock! Bliar watered down left wing politics to the point where they were indistinguishable from the right. I hope with all my heart his guy wins the leadership. Bravo.
Safe to say that Labour leaders from the past - Wilson, Callaghan, Gaitskell et al - would watch this stuff in disbelief. Are these pygmies really the best that the party has to offer?
clearly, "the dude abides"
Corbyn is going to wipe the floor with all of their smirking arses!
What did David Cameron run before he became Conservative leader? What a fucking ridiculous question.
Serious question, why is Corbyn's voice sound different here?
I am sick of the old politicians of the blairite ERA! I HOPE CORBYN BECOMES THE LABOUR LEADER!
Labour was for the safety and protection of barely paid workers from the abuses of profiteering business people, who would cut all safety corners,see recent explosions in China, for inhuman profits. All the worst excesses of the Industrial revolution have been swept away from public view in our path to "glory". Labour died when disaffected middle class teenagers, who always had the protection of their parent's wealth, decided they would be naughty and cool and vote against their parents and for Labour. They then transformed it into the same self serving crock that is the Conservatives and other parties. Politics is not about policies and the population, but about the careers paths of politicians and those who vote for them. The working classes who are working for a pittance and a revolving door of cheap and happy to do anything for a buck workers from this country and others, have long since given up voting because of this charade. Blair was the devil incarnate as was his cronies. They all lied to keep their jobs no one lifted a finger against his megalomania and the same applies to Cameron
"We'd attract more people to vote, we'd increase the electorate" he was right
Jeremy Corbyn's rhetoric is 100% wishful thinking. He and his supporters wouldn't know pragmatism if slapped them in the face.
corbyn ROCKS!!!
Missed opportunity there Jeremy. "What qualifies you to be prime minister". Response "I will serve and deliver in the interests of the people not the corporate elite, and that sets me apart from every other candidate and the ruling party"
Corbyn needs to get better at batting off right wing/establishment media attacks like 'you are going to run a deficit forever'.
Hope he,s leader for a very long time....
He could get rid of Evette Cooper straight away.
Misspelling Corbyn LBC? Along the old Ron Paul lines over in the states. Horrendous that. And so deliberate.
He speaks sense, and he has a point people won't vote for another middle right suit that churns out same shit. It needs to be a better alternative, I think old JC has them shitting it a bit haha. Bring on the revolution
God help Labour if he gets elected!!!
As long as Jeremy Corbyn is Labour Leader he will get my vote
People keep trying to say JC's splitting Labour - yet it was Blair who moved away from the origins of Labour and put the party in a direction that these guys are trying so desperately to keep on track. JC's support is the roots, the origins and marginalised. Those electorates lost to protest votes to nationalism and sick of politicians corrupt and useless to them, people like Blair, Fox, Campbell and the mass of Tories looking sell the state and the peoples assets to the highest bidder.
They keep trying like the Tories to focus on the person, not the policy - probably because JC's policy is something they don't want to give air time or argue. Maybe the cant argue! Where is the politics there!!? Where is our political system??!
JC offers a vehicle to allow people to regain politics. He articulates an alternative from the Institution and expresses an idea of the UK that is based on equality, the electorate and a progressive, intellectual attitude than brings some dignity and quality into OUR, the peoples, UK political system.
Today I watch that prick Cameron say he wanted ALL schools in the UK to be an Academy. Free, privatized schools. Two weeks ago Osbourne sold the banks at cut cost to those that ruined them and cost the UK billions. I've watched for the last six years as cuts after cuts after cuts after cuts have stripped the state of its infrastructure, food banks grow, pay packets shrink, money go less far, youth unemployment rise, quality of life drop, social mobility freeze and malcontent grow. This, whilst the current leaders reward the super rich, pander to the elites, take from those with less and give to those with more.
Corbyn, the better you do, the better WE do. You are the only voice for the real people that MAKE the UK.
'They' might not be listening, but WE are. And WE are the ones that count.
oh and Cameron what has he managed before was become Tory leader aside of his assets?!
Good answer!!
Well at least I know I'm not voting Labour or Conservative in 2020. Time to look into the other parties.
Corbyn answers the fucking question thank fuck for that
He's going to apologise for the 2003 intervention in Iraq, which will temporarily give the extreme-left a warm, fuzzy feeling inside their delicate, little hearts because they believe that the state of the Iraqi economy is much more important than human survival. It will also embolden the Jihadi militants whom will see the 2003 intervention as a victory. The only major thing he shares in common with those Islamists is the idea that human survival is less important than other things. One prefers a healthy economy, the other values political victory.
He's woefully unqualified. Hilarious.
+K Russell And Cameron is?
hoah After today. Fuck yes.
K Russell lol. No.
"Ask Me Anything"? It won't make a bind bit of difference to my answer i will just waffle and lie through what's left of my teeth.
Did you actually watch the video?
......and if Corbyn needs help, we WILL help him, rather than just talking up a load of bollocks.
i will vote labour if corbyn was leader
Answer the question.. Do you want to be prime minister? sure? He doesn't believe it either... He's lining up to loose..
+G Man You are a tory.
Of course he wants to be prime minister, what a stupid question.
Oh dear Yvette that was a bit desperate wasn't it?
The establishment and media really do not like Corbyn, which in a positive result. I have not trusted Labour, 'New Labour or is it Tory Light' since John Smith but if Corbyn gets the job and does not renege on his positions that will change. Yes I like Bernie Sanders too
Yvette, your naivety is quite distressing. What is the point in getting a Labour government elected if its policies don't represent Labour party members? The 'get elected at all costs' is a pathetic viewpoint, especially if you are not actually providing any real choice or difference.
From a laymans perspective i've looked into Friedrich Hayeks thoughts and Michael Alberts (participatory economics) . They both seem to have many good points but I'm not convinced either.. Maybe what Yvette saying is that Labour needs to target the middle ground. As human beings, globally I think we are heading in the direction of extinction. We need major change in many areas or we and the planet are in big trouble . I have no idea if the whole climate change thing but we all know pollution, extraction of resources, business 'externalities' , general division and distrust amongst peoples is causing a crush of tectonic plates in a major way.
Corbyn. Was. Right.