@@h.a8681 Many APFSDS with less pen can go through the T-72 UFP, the problem is when the TURMS is in hulldown you will not do much against it even witth the shell the Strv 105 is getting.
@@h.a8681 That only work in a close combat where you can take out his breech and then you can get to him before he finish the repair. However in a situation where you see a T-72 hulldown from a medium to long range, taking out his breech will only prevent him from killing you for sometime but he can just pull back and repair it so you must drive up to his position before that happens which is not gonna be possible with such a slow tank like Centurion. Another thing is if a T-72 is hulldown while you are in a Centurion, well, you will be dead before you can even aim at his gun breech.
All of the servos and ballistic computers and stuff was on paper better than the strv 121, but it was still a centurion so it was outperformed by the 121 in trials anyway. The M/90C stands for centurion, and the M/90S stands for the S-tank. The S-tank could not fit the M/90 in the loading mechanism so they shortened it by ~2cm and called it M/90S. So the strv103 had also the m/90 irl
God I love the Centurions. And this one is the ultimate one. WW2 design pushed to its limits. Amazing piece of tank technology when you think about it. I think I will finally start grinding the swedes today :D
@@Sh-epard Well, yes but i'm talking about how it is similar to Type 74G with the thermal sight mounted on the mantlet or the year it was upgraded or even the story of how the Swed tried to modernize their aging MBT just to ended up with a completely new tank instead. This is a similar background to how the Type 74G project was abandoned in favor for the more modern Type 90 due to the cost problem.
@@krellio9006 Read the reply before you make another reply. Well, first of all i could not find any source suggest that the strv 105 has a 900 hp engine even the vehicle suggestion on the forum says it is only 750 hp so there is a high chance that it won't be keeping its 900 hp. And even if it does it still will be slow with only 50 km/h top speed and weight of 54 tons ! That mean even with 900 hp engine the HP/T is still only 16 HP/T, where the Type 74 has 18 HP/T. The only thing it has over the Type 74 is slightly better shell but then again this is not a comparison as i already have explained what i mean by this tank being similar to the Type 74G. And btw it is not 4 km/h it's 7* km/h nerf.
Swedish centurions are bad and I don't know why. They should be the exact same in some cases and they perform worse and that's not just my opinion 8ve spoken to people on the forums, Facebook and sqn members and they all see it too. These top centurions are no comparison for the shot kal in comparison. Just so much better
Basically a worse Olifant Mk2 for Sweden, but it kinda looks pretty nice with the fat optic on the turretfront.
9.0 Centurion with DM63...well, to me it's enough to reliable deal with a lot of enemy tanks.
Year ago I saw title of topic "King Centurion" with this Strv 105 but basically this is most modern Centurion in the game except TTD.
900hp is quite refreshing if it’s anything like the olifant mk2
I'm currently spading my 7.7 Swedish lineup - as a fairly defensive player this has given me something more to aim at for later tiers
Damn can't wait to fight TURMS in a centurion.
The Shell on the STRV 105 will go straight through the front of a T72 TURMS
@@h.a8681
Many APFSDS with less pen can go through the T-72 UFP, the problem is when the TURMS is in hulldown you will not do much against it even witth the shell the Strv 105 is getting.
@@i_nameless_i-jgsdf shoot the gun breech
@@h.a8681 That only work in a close combat where you can take out his breech and then you can get to him before he finish the repair.
However in a situation where you see a T-72 hulldown from a medium to long range, taking out his breech will only prevent him from killing you for sometime but he can just pull back and repair it so you must drive up to his position before that happens which is not gonna be possible with such a slow tank like Centurion.
Another thing is if a T-72 is hulldown while you are in a Centurion, well, you will be dead before you can even aim at his gun breech.
9.0 strv105 has better thermals than a 11.0 M1A2
And more penetration than a Leo 2A4
@@adrfarling5503 stange times we live in eh?
All of the servos and ballistic computers and stuff was on paper better than the strv 121, but it was still a centurion so it was outperformed by the 121 in trials anyway.
The M/90C stands for centurion, and the M/90S stands for the S-tank. The S-tank could not fit the M/90 in the loading mechanism so they shortened it by ~2cm and called it M/90S. So the strv103 had also the m/90 irl
@@canadianwaffenwaffle2976 Yee
Just a point of note, the Strv103-0 was the CBT vehicle for Sweden. Just sayin.
God I love the Centurions. And this one is the ultimate one. WW2 design pushed to its limits. Amazing piece of tank technology when you think about it. I think I will finally start grinding the swedes today :D
Pretty much the Swedish equivelent to Type 74 G.
But with the DM63 105mm...which is much much better than Type 93 APFSDS
@@Sh-epard
Well, yes but i'm talking about how it is similar to Type 74G with the thermal sight mounted on the mantlet or the year it was upgraded or even the story of how the Swed tried to modernize their aging MBT just to ended up with a completely new tank instead.
This is a similar background to how the Type 74G project was abandoned in favor for the more modern Type 90 due to the cost problem.
900hp?
Better shell?
All Type 74 is also getting reverse speed nerf, only -4kmh now.
@@krellio9006
Read the reply before you make another reply.
Well, first of all i could not find any source suggest that the strv 105 has a 900 hp engine even the vehicle suggestion on the forum says it is only 750 hp so there is a high chance that it won't be keeping its 900 hp. And even if it does it still will be slow with only 50 km/h top speed and weight of 54 tons ! That mean even with 900 hp engine the HP/T is still only 16 HP/T, where the Type 74 has 18 HP/T.
The only thing it has over the Type 74 is slightly better shell but then again this is not a comparison as i already have explained what i mean by this tank being similar to the Type 74G.
And btw it is not 4 km/h it's 7* km/h nerf.
It's more of a Swedish equivalent to olifant mk2
Hey tec could you review the german su-22 next keep up the good work
Is this vehicle better or worse than the Olifant Mk 2? Because they are very similar
Should be a bit worse in the mobility and armour department.
Olifant Mk2 is better with armor, and even thermals (gen 2).
Olifant mk 2 is still overall better.
M900 is the best 105 round
I know its gonna be bad.... A centurion at 9.0 with leo 1 gun, even tho leo 1 does everything the 105 does but better....
Luckily I’m already passed the 122 so I don’t need to grind another slow ass cent.
Meanwhile in US 9.0.....
Gaijin: Best i could do is M375
We get m774 on the m60a3tts
@@reverencerx873 whats the max pen on M774?
that moment when a centurion has better thermals than a leo2a4 or leo2a5(excluding the commander optics that have gen2 thermals)
*m1a2 crying on courner*
Like all of these 9.0 modernized 60s tanks, meh
Swedish centurions are bad and I don't know why. They should be the exact same in some cases and they perform worse and that's not just my opinion 8ve spoken to people on the forums, Facebook and sqn members and they all see it too. These top centurions are no comparison for the shot kal in comparison. Just so much better
No Leopard EVO ...sigh
Your getting a puma stop complaining German mains cry to much
@@chase7354 so true and also the mla and also the su22 and also a boat and also a low tier premium
No, Germany needs 2a6 nerf!!!!!!!!
The EVO is for SWEDEN
@@chase7354 its for Sweden, Sweden suffers