This lens takes 3D Macro Photos
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Read more about this rig here at the inventor's website: www.sherlockph...
Build and print the lens yourself here (info about prism and microscope lens here as well): www.printables...
I used a Sony A7IV and a Sony A6000 camera and a Godox TT685 flash (plus wireless trigger) for the sample photos in this video
MICAEL's OLYMPUS MACRO KIT
📷 Camera: OM-1 amzn.to/3Mqizvy
🔎 Lens: M.Zuiko 60mm amzn.to/3pxVyxT
💥 Flash: Godox v350o
⚪️ Diffuser: Cygnustech / cygnustech
🔎 Closeup lens: Raynox DCR-250
🎗 This is my camera strap: amzn.to/3LJA2Ny
MICAEL's SONY MACRO KIT
🔎 My favorite macro lens: bit.ly/mwlaowa85 (I always buy Laowa lenses from their website - best price, good service, and fast, free shipping worldwide)
🔭 My favorite wildlife lens: amzn.to/3DM2meZ
💥 Flash: amzn.to/3xhpc9E
🔋 Flash batteries: www.gpbatterie...
📷 Sony A7 IV Camera: amzn.to/3BKQ1Ij
🎗 This is my camera strap: amzn.to/3LJA2Ny
⚪️ I use this diffuser: bit.ly/mwakdif...
HOW I MAKE MY VIDEOS
For my indoor RUclips videos I currently use these tools that I feel give excellent results and a very simple workflow.
📷 Camera: Sony ZV-E1 amzn.to/3oBzYsc and XLR-K3M handle amzn.to/3ONbTJH
🔭 Lens: Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art amzn.to/3owvJyh
🎤 Microphone: Sennheiser MKH-416 amzn.to/45FbQpu
💡 Light: Godox SL60W amzn.to/42gcNBq with a Godox SB-UE 80cm softbox amzn.to/3qmrxBu
📷 B-camera: Sony ZV-1 amzn.to/3MEO449
💻 Editing: Macbook Air M1 amzn.to/3INlAUA with Final Cut Pro
🎶 Music: Epidemic Sound: bit.ly/mwepidemic
For outdoor filming I prefer a small and simple setup that makes filming myself very easy and fast.
📷 Camera: DJI Pocket 2 amzn.to/3oAT5Tp
🦵 Monopod that I use as a tripod: Benro A38FD amzn.to/42ibbY1
PLEASE TALK TO ME HERE AS WELL:
💌 newsletter: mwroll.com
🌄 instagram: / mwroll
🐦 twitter: / micaelwidell
🎖 patreon: / micaelwidell
💬 discord: bit.ly/widelld...
Many of the links above are affiliate links, which means that I earn a small commission if you buy something via the links - at no extra cost to you. I greatly appreciate when people use these links, as it is an important income stream to keep this channel alive. ❤️
Thank you for watching my videos. 🥰
Thanks for watching! Please also visit my... 🐞 favorite gear: micaelwidell.com/#gear 🐛 lens guide: lensguide.micaelwidell.com 🪳 newsletter: micaelwidell.com 🐜 instagram: instagram.com/mwroll 🪲 twitter: twitter.com/micaelwidell
I wish you a good day! See you in the next video.
Someone said weird lens?
Me trying to see in 3D and then realize I am blind to one eye 😂 oops
You can still see the depth effect by making it into a wiggle gif. Having one eye doesn't stop you from seeing depth, you just have to look at it differently. Even with one eye, when you move side to side or even look slightly to the side, your brain still processes the depth. It's easier with two eyes obviously, but we adapt.
@3d420com yeah true, I'll get surgery on my eye on Monday so I'll just come back to this video after that, easier haha
I work for a camera retailer, so I've gotten to meet a load of different photographers with unique specializations... stuff like "Underwater family portraits" or "Wildfire landscapes", but I will always remember the gentleman who, when asked what he liked to shoot, pulled a 3d printed viewmaster out of his bag, popped his phone into it, and then showed me gorgeous 3d photos of the Grand Canyon and Redwood forests. I don't think I would want to do all the legwork involved myself, but it's an amazing and memorable kind of art to make.
It's easy. You can do it with just your phone. No legwork necessary to get started in 3d.
I think canon have a 3d lens.
Yes Canon RF 5.2mm F2.8L DUAL FISHEYE Lens
@@Lon1an Yes. It's a great lens, but it is not able to take macro photos.
It's easier to do it with the images arranged the other way then you go slightly cross-eyed to get the effect. A bonus of doing it this way is that the images can be much larger so you get more clarity and 3d effect.
Agreed. The Sherlockphoto website shows them for cross-eyed viewing.
cross-eyed stereoscopic images are definitely easier to view imho, I couldnt get the "look at the horizon" to work at all
Those of us who practice parallel 3d in the manner it was done since the days of 3D Daguerreotypes do not agree. I can not view cross eye formats but have a collection of antique stereoviews (7 inch wide cards) which can be freeviewed (with practice) or use various types of viewers. Freeviewing is a matter of training your eyes to diverge rather than cross. Fifty years ago there were a few clubs for 3D photographers of which I know one still exists. Part of the problem was that there were people who worked in cross eye, parallel and anaglyph methods and each had trouble viewing the work of the others.
Canon makes an $1800 3d lens suitable for their R5. There are several adapters made for 3D but most fail when you get too close. IMHO the 5mm spacing is a bit narrow for the lenses being used. I understand that Zerene stacker has a stereo routine but I have never looked into it since I am satisfied with normal focus stacking for now. As always, I fear 3D will die again and again due to the lack of standards agreed on by all. I still prefer the card formats as used in the 1850-1950 period before Stereo Realist and Viewmaster made Stereo easy and less detailed than before.
Whichever way works for you, use it! I could only see crosseyed 3d for 50 years, then all of a sudden I looked at a parallel image on Instagram, and it just worked ever since.
I can do it both ways but crosseyed is much better because I can do it with an image no matter how large it is. There is a limit to how far your eyes can diverge which limits the parallel method. @@3d420com
I've done the same effect in normal photography before and it's pretty cool. I take one picture, move the camera left or right a couple of inches (ideally the distance between our eyes), and then take the second picture. Then put the left picture on the right and the right picture on the left. It works best with many vertical objects of different distances like trees of a forest, or cemetery tomb stones.
Weird, I don't really see much 3D on your images (mostly just perceive that the images are on a plane "behind" where my screen is. But the images from the website that you showed pop out very well.
I also found that the size you view them in is important. If you watch this video on a smartphone the photos might be a bit too small. For me it is easier on a computer screen or tv.
@@MicaelWidell I used a relatively large computer screen. It's odd.
I think you might be crossing your eyes instead of using the parallel view technique (the pics on my website are oriented for cross-eyed viewing but the ones in this video are the opposite). Cross-eyed viewing allows much larger images so I prefer it!
finally I got it, I can see that middle image - it's crazy!!!!!!!!
"It's a schooner!"
Cool gadget. I do the same thing but with a 4" slider with my camera attached. I take one photo at the far left and then another at the far right. I have software that will combine these two photos into a stereogram. I have a replica stereogram viewer like the ones used in the 1890's, that I put the dual photo stereogram into the viewer and VIOLA! a stereogram.
You are very cool, but there is one thing, all the photos you made need to be swapped. There is no 3d effect in your examples. But when i swapped them it looks very cool. Thanks.
I guess I must be one of those people who can't see the 3D effect. I was viewing them on a 55-inch TV screen from 10 feet away, so that may have affected the outcome.
this is not accurate as dexcribed. you have got to use software or your eyes to combine 2 shots to have 3d effect so this lens does not give you the effect your eyes or the software
'If that's you.... Then i'm sorry😅' This made me laugh so hard. 😂😂
It hurt my eyes unnecessarily but I couldn’t see 3D.😢
Your samples are reversed, the eyes and mouth are behind the head.
So Micael, is that just a shirt or do you believe in UFO's? Can Indoors Micael talk about it...?!
I just loved the X-files series in the 90s. I don't really have an opinion on UFOs :)
If you make a video of the images rapidly switching to and from one another, you can achieve the effect of stereoscopy en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggle_stereoscopy
Yeah I tried it but the effect wasn’t very impressive with just 2 images. I think 4+ images are needed to make it look cool
@@MicaelWidell It can be done with two. The trick is to align the stereo on a center axis instead of the standard stereo window. If it's aligned to the front window, a two image 3d will wag instead of wiggle.
I didn't get anything looking into the distance. It wasn't until I went cross eyed that I saw it and could focus on it in the middle.
Yes, they merge into one image, but it doesn't really show the 3D effect. Try looking at the images linked in the description. They really jump out.
@@julianm12345 But it does. I tried it on the images in the description too. I saw them in 3D. At least 2D layered 3D. Unless I'm refocusing subconsciously further away? It kind of just pops into focus when I relax my eyes. Not sure what my eyes are doing TBH. I just know that if I try to focus in the distance, nothing happens at all
@@ArcanePath360 I'm not sure whether in this case you're seeing a "hollow face" type illusion. To get it to work properly using cross-eyes you need the original right eye view on the left and vice versa. There's not a lot of difference between the images on Micael's example, but you can see it's got a left eye view on the left.
@@julianm12345 Well since the images combine into one I'm not sure it's important which eye sees which image. The final result I'm sure is the same, since the original perspective from both images would be restored in either case.
@@ArcanePath360 The left eye has to see the image taken from the left viewpoint, and the right from the right. If you have the left viewpoint image on the left then you would have to merge the images by looking "through" the screen. By swapping the images around you get the correct image to each eye by going cross eyed. I think most people find the cross method easier. Although I think it causes more eye strain.
For me the 3d effect works much quicker if I hold my upright hand sideways (like a karate chop) between the 2 images then they slide together
Even better is to use a sheet or cardboard, paper, etc. instead.
I could see the 3d effect, but can't we just do this with the same image side by side?
No. There needs to be distance between the two cameras to create parallax 3d. For macro, you don't want too much distance. This rig is specifically made to give a stereosopic effect at 5mm.
you must invert the photo to be proper 3d !
I only have one functional eye...
One-Eyed Jacks are SOL!
Hi Micael, this was fun but, as you say, probably not a major new direction. Have you, though, tried some Gaussian Splatter imaging... i.e making 3D images from multiple-angle shots of a single insect (George would be perfect!)?
Thanks! I watch your channel a lot. I'm a 3d and macro photographer with Cascade Stereoscopic Club. This is something a lot of 3d people will want! I've shared your video to a bunch of 3d photography groups. I hope it gives you a boost.
Thanx Micael, hope you had a great holiday... A very unusual rig, looks interesting, though I could not see the photos in 3D, never have been able to... good to see you back.... Colin Devon uk
I think the 3D effect of the floating merged image is more pronounced when the image is photographed with a more shallow depth of field. Very clever and simple system that apparently works well. I guess a modified version where the two images could be separated more would result in an even greater 3D effect.
I actually see 4 faces, the one in middle after a while it slipts again😂
Has anyone used the canon stereo lens?
I've seen the results, and it's great within a short range. The lenses are pretty close together, so things further away go flat.
Yeah Micael, 2 cameras to take 1 image isn't going to work for me. Even if the 3D effect can be seen as a printed image, it's just not worth it for me. Thanks for sharing, no love lost for your channel, I'll keep watching your videos😊.
Haha I do not imagine most people would be interested in using this (me included), but I wanted to show this for entertainment and education purposes.
Why use a prism? Its got two objectives, so two different light paths...put a mirror in one light path and leave the other light path free...or am i missing something?
The prism separates the light evenly. A mirror would make one side brighter than the other.
You can also view these pictures using an old stereoscope viewer. They were popular in the first half of the last century. They were made by several different companies, Keystone View Company was one of the best known. If you look around, you should be able to find one for well under $100. I’ve been collecting them and the vintage stereograph pictures for years. These are pre View-Master machines. This was what “VR” was, 100 years ago.
View them on your phone with google cardboard.
@@3d420com I forgot about those. That's a great idea, for anyone who doesn't happen to have an antique stereoscope or two sitting around.
I can't do it. Macrocel... 😔