Immunity Eliminated! 😳 The Rock Wannabe Body Slams Unarmed & Compliant Motorist! Bodycam Footage!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- 2023.03.07
9th US Circuit Court of Appeals
Unpublished Opinion: law.justia.com...
Bodycam: • ‘I’m glad I wasn’t kil...
Settlement Resolution for $150,000: eservices.scot...
😳 Father Exposes Complaint Shredding Operation! 👨⚖️🥊😂 • 😳 Father Exposes Compl...
#sherrytheshredder
Other Interesting Cases:
Gangsta CPS Loses Immunity! 😳 Demands the Right to Lie to Violate Citizens & Kidnap Kids! • Gangsta CPS Loses Immu...
-----
I'm just trying to be a dad after my kids were abducted.
Why I am the Father in Exile:
How to Fight Corrupt Family Court (Expose it!)
• How to Fight Corrupt F...
Voter Fraud and Abduction Admission Caught on Court TV in NV
• Voter Fraud and Abduct...
Judicial Misconduct & Rights Violations Caught on Court TV - Santa Clara, CA Judge Roberta Hayashi
• Voter Fraud, Judicial ...
Ring Camera! Kidnapping Coppers Exposed! 😳 Admit I Reported Corruption But Refuse to Investigate! • Kidnapping Coppers Exp...
Kidnapper Judge Cindy Hendrickson Revokes Illegal Order 😳 (2023)! Admits Denying Me Due Process! • Kidnapper Judge Cindy ...
Secret Judge Club Exposed 😳 at Corrupt California State Bar Meeting! (2023) • Secret Judge Club Expo...
Santa Clara County California Superior Court Judges Who Deny Due Process and Participate in Misconduct and Felonies: Roberta Hayashi, Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Brooke Blecher, Thomas Kuhnle. Transcripts and Filings Will be Released Publicly on this Channel.
#fatherson #missingsomeone #pitbull #dogshorts #dogjokes #familycourt #vegas #vegaslocals #clarkcounty #nevada #nevergiveup #dogdad #corruption #exposed #california #santaclara #southlaketahoe #funny #entertainment #comedy #viral #music #trending #shortvideo #fun
Unpublished Opinion: law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/22-15454/22-15454-2023-05-08.html
Bodycam: ruclips.net/video/r_BL0WetZRw/видео.htmlsi=EWOL2BVezy0lk3ld
Settlement Resolution for $150,000: eservices.scottsdaleaz.gov/cityclerk/DocumentViewer/Show/cf5d0c2a-66d5-40a7-8d02-72f125a41ab2
😳 Father Exposes Complaint Shredding Operation! 👨⚖🥊😂 ruclips.net/video/u4JCc4qO30o/видео.html
#sherrytheshredder
Other Interesting Cases:
Gangsta CPS Loses Immunity 😳 Demands the Right to Lie to Violate Citizens & Kidnap Kids! ruclips.net/video/llXqlKB_AME/видео.htmlsi=q974eNTgxew4MKqE
-----
I'm just trying to be a dad after my kids were abducted.
Why I am the Father in Exile:
How to Fight Corrupt Family Court (Expose it!)
ruclips.net/video/pVgudZtNYiQ/видео.html
Voter Fraud and Abduction Admission Caught on Court TV in NV
ruclips.net/video/J9FeWPKEFo8/видео.html
Judicial Misconduct & Rights Violations Caught on Court TV - Santa Clara, CA Judge Roberta Hayashi
ruclips.net/video/Zgog-NLFyC8/видео.html
Ring Camera! Kidnapping Coppers Exposed! 😳 Admit I Reported Corruption But Refuse to Investigate! ruclips.net/video/ONUR0GL9Voc/видео.html
Kidnapper Judge Cindy Hendrickson Revokes Illegal Order 😳 (2023)! Admits Denying Me Due Process! ruclips.net/video/hRaX0g7rgS8/видео.html
Secret Judge Club Exposed 😳 at Corrupt California State Bar Meeting! (2023) ruclips.net/video/LHRTQh0WTYk/видео.html
Santa Clara County California Superior Court Judges Who Deny Due Process and Participate in Misconduct and Felonies: Roberta Hayashi, Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Brooke Blecher, Thomas Kuhnle. Transcripts and Filings Will be Released Publicly on this Channel.
2021 - 1200 civilians were shot and killed by cops. Same year 63 cops were shot and killed by civilians. 20:1 ration makes "Office Safety" a B.S. story. The 4th Amendment makes no mention of Detention, RAS, Dogs, Arrest, Officer Safety, Investigative Detention, or Qualified Immunity. These concepts are from the SCOTUS violating Separation of Powers and redefining the Constitution. The SCOTUS is a PRIVATE Corporation (Fascist) as listed on D&B (Unconstitutional), and you have No Standing (No Rights). Narcissists aka cops are inherently UNREASONABLE, because crazy people don't know they are crazy.
The cop opened the car door causing the interior light to come on. There was no "reach into the dark".
Great videos, exile! Keep it up!!
What the Actual F@ck! I saw the video and the lawyer is right, this tyrant doesn't need to be a cop anyplace. Actually deserves a jail sentence.
Have you ever seen the FBI press release showing the symbol for "little boy lover"? Look it up, then look up the badges of the LA County Sheriffs! You will be MIND BLOWN!
Seems to me: the cop wanted to beat the crap out of him..
Do u think after he got notified of the lawsuit, The Rock Wanabee said, “It doesn’t matter!” 😂
@@fatherinexile
CAN YOU SMELLELLELLELLOWWW... THE LAW... SUIT... COOKIN 🤣
What was dude was reaching for his phone to record the asshole that violating his rights!!
He is a c0p.
I'm sure he is a no good bully who thinks he is God.
Exactly, if saftey is the greatest priority, I can't understand how raising tension and giving conflicting orders isn't building a foundation to a dangerous situation.
The funny thing is, if you feel a person doesn't like your chosen profession (which isn't illegal) escalating to violence etc proved them right. He did nothing to change his perception.
the cop is obviously the one that escalated things. He had a bad attitude right from the start. He ordered the man out just because he rightly told the cop he better lose the attitude. The cop had already said that same thing to the man, along with accusations. Cop can dish out but cant take it. Hypocrite, jerk, control freak.
Its "A Clockwork BLUE" on our streets! Cops are EAGER TO BE VIOLENT, and GLEEFULLY SADISTIC! They are PERPETUALLY ESCALATING to try to INSTIGATE and CREATE a charge!
Exactly what it was.....
I am betting traffic stops are more dangerous for law abiding citizens than cops.
They're not cops, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo
Agree
100%
Yes
You would be wrong by a LONGSHOT. Never mind the idea that you threw "law abiding citizen" in there because nobody knows who is going to be law abiding until after the fact, but police get ambushed by other people, or hit by cars all the time. Traffic stops are the source of the vast majority of officer fatalities (FOR WHERE THERE ARE A LOT). Try not to lie to others, but most importantly don't lie to yourself. If you can't judge reality you'll be making huge mistakes your entire life.
It’s great when the judges truly pick apart a nonsense argument and not let it slide by just because it’s coming from a prosecutor or a cop
Here here.
Or is it “hear hear”? Which actually makes sense. 😂
Or here, hear
I'd say "hear here", but what do I know.
Such a rare sight these days. When you or I are accused of a crime, it is government against one person (and especially the prosecutor)... but when a cop commits a crime, it is one man against the entire city and the prosecutor actually fights FOR the cop (the accused)? That alone seems like a major conflict of interest, and we all know how the judges, lawyers and DA's trade favors and barter cases. If a cop is accused, like in this case, then it is he alone who should defend himself (and his own lawyer), but to have the entire city behind to defend him is a blatant violation of the Rights of The People and especially to equal protection. It is not the Constitution that gives cops/government More Power, but it is the Constitution that Restricts the power of government, yet in cases like this, government attacks one, but then comes to the aid of another. (and of course the one's they help are always government). It's a good example on why we need the Constitution and why (as The People) we have the Right and Duty to set things like this straight when we see them. It is the job of a prosecutor to enforce JUST Laws and not to defend or protect another agent of government from the consequence of his own actions. It is the DA (in this case) whom should be prosecuting the assailant (cop), but instead, she defends him?
"Get out of the car or I'm going to hurt you". Pretty much sums up the officer's attitude. Don't obey him like a dog and you've got an "attitude" and he's going to teach you a lesson.
Cop should be charged with assault.
🎯
@@fatherinexile it all starts at the Academy, all cops are taught to dominate, threaten and torture anybody that doesn't agree with them.
We all know that pretextual traffic stops are being used wrongly and as a weapon against a certain minority.
The blatant threats of deadly force and raw video footage of seniors, veterans, pregnant women and people in medical crisis have flooded the news and social media for years...they are just being wilfully brutalized by rogue cops.
Cops openly boast about not caring about being sued, then going on paid vacation or leave is a well known fact!!!
This is how 99 percent of cops operate. Let 10 people comply they them think they are invincible.
I’m pretty sure a member of the public will not get assault charge for body slamming an officer.. Assuming the person survive a hail of gunfire, taser and baton strikes.. You get multiple felony charges.
So, yes, you are right the officers
must be charged, but with multiple felonies.
Aggravated assault*
6 months to 'be' a cop
TWO YEARS to BE a hairdresser
Great point!
And they don’t disqualify you from being a hairdresser if you are too smart. But american police do have that criteria, in fact, the lowest criteria in the world.
Good grief! I never looked at it through that lens. What an amazing observation, good job!
So when a cop places his hand on his gun isn't that a threat to citizens safety.
Ooooh! Interesting point!
@@fatherinexileCops are hypocrites who don't practice what they preach.
@@ianbattles7290 This could be the understatement of the year.
Just shush and OBEY YOUR MASTERS!!!
Cops are threats to citizens as soon as they enter that patrol vehicle for their shift.
If a cop can't control his emotion at a traffic stop he has no business being a cop.
It "law" enforcement, not "My feelings" enforcement.
If he gets violent that quickly with a civilian, I can only imagine how he is with his family.
LEO = Large Ego Oppressor
@@robertroth618 well there has been several studies done on this subject, some cops come home and cry to their wife in her arms the things they seen that day and their wives help them through it, depending on their wives reaction they go to work the next day and do their job according to their wife's advice, others come home and immediately cause chaos, beat their wives, abuse the family and then take it out on their calls when they go to work, either way is wrong, i think they need to seek medical intervention and not do ther job based on their home life or the advice given from a spouse, it distorts the law, there needs to be professionalism, but an insecure cop who is so afraid get killed on duty needs to really consider weather or not he is fit for duty, its a hard job there is no doubt about it, there are different emotions flying around at every call, cops need more surveillance and a closer tight grasp on their emotional ability to do their job properly, i think they need to attend regular assessments from an outside agency designed to look for the signs of irregularities in emotional patterns as part of a protocol, lets face it they see things that most of us will never see and we cant afford to have these loose cannons being the ones that "serve and protect" if they deviate from that mandate, thats why we see all these violent, law breaking, murdering cops with qualified immunity still corrupting our streets.
We don't have these problems with the fire department. You know why?
It's largely because they stay at the station until someone calls for them. If they went around writing tickets for fire safety violations, people would be just as fed up with the revenuing by the fire department as they do the police department.
Maybe the cops should stay at the police station until someone calls for them.
@@robertroth618the statistic is 40% of police officers commit domestic violence.
Safe bet.
This case just shows the travesty of qualified immunity .
If you or I did what these cops did, we would be in jail for a long time.
If still alive ...
Right, that's what makes me mad . If a person did that it would be prison time ASAP.
That is because we lack qualified immunity, a powerful union to protect us and tax payer resources to make that all happen. A billionaire might get away with it in the U.S, though; probably get some form of probation.
@@andreaallen1362 We the People need to get rid of "Qualified Immunity" Even the KKK Group had jumped in to do their scott free Unalive of Blacks and brown people. It's not even a matter of race anymore,, because these low IQ KKK members don't care if your black or white.
Update, June 2023: Driver Dominguez apparently suffered a broken nose and lost his job. An appeals court denied cops' claim of qualified immunity, and found it likely that a jury would find that the cops violated his Fourth Amendment rights by using unwarranted force. Shortly afterwards, the City of Scottsdale settled for $150K without admitting fault. It appears that the two officers are no longer with Scottsdale PD.
I was looking for a news article for the settlement cause I knew I saw it, but I needed to step away from the computer. If I find it, I will add link. Thank you!
all this settling for some change and no other demands (like licence for these cops revoked, apology letter, admit of guilt etc.) is why police does what it does ...
@@germaninsider7890how about prison
And unfortunately these officers will go on to become a problem somewhere else. They should have had their peace officer certification permanently revoked.
but they will be with some other cop station doing the same thing
Cop: Get out of the car !!!
Driver: Step away from my door so i can open it !!!
Cop: Give me your license & Registration !!!
Driver: Reaches for paperwork.
Cop: Don't move !!!
😂😂 I love this comment
What a beautiful question. “Why must we look at this from the favorable perspective of the officer?” This question must be asked in any case involving aggressive law enforcement.
I'm a little concerned they said numerous time the law is in favor of the cop
Qualified immunity is from the perspective of the cop at time of action. Reasonable and lawful gets their immunity every time.
@@michaellovett8773 there shouldn't be favor one side or the other. It should be unbiased the whole way round. The mentality that cops are the good guys has been out the window for as long as I have been around and longer. Rodney King opened the eyes to a LOT of people about the cops yet people still believe they are the good guys. RUclips has exposed millions to the fact that cops are more corrupt than criminals. Personally there shouldn't be a thing like qualified immunity. When you get a trial you are suppose to have an unbiased judge yet go to any traffic court and you get a biased judge every time the second they pull up your criminal records they use that to determine your guilt on top of they want to keep getting money for their own pockets.
I've said this a hundred times, why is the cops word any more reliable than mine!!!!!
That’s how summary judgements work. Look up what a summary judgment is and how it works.
At no point was the officer threatened. The only threats came from the officer. The only violence was initiated by the officer.
Cops PROVE, ...EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR, ...that they are EAGER TO BE VIOLENT, and GLEEFULLY SADISTIC! Cops responses are ALWAYS way out of line with the infraction, or situation at hand. Its "A Clockwork BLUE" on our streets! Cops are EAGER TO BE VIOLENT, and GLEEFULLY SADISTIC! They are PERPETUALLY ESCALATING to try to INSTIGATE and CREATE a charge!
The obviousness of this situation is that the officer initiated a scenario of aggression to getting a reaction from the driver for the sole purpose of being able to make a charge of resisting to justify the excessive force he used. The judges could see this in the video and were right on the mark in their objections to the cop's actions. It even went as far as them noticing that the officer stepped up to the car's door PREVENTING the driver from making an exit.
So it was a normal stop
I hate America..reaching reaching reaching
@dennismood7476 they do that to nail you with assault on a peace officer. Just like when they're serving and protecting you while saying "stop resisting"
that was not an arrest, it was an assault
The judges fairly well dismantled her arguments in the first 7 minutes by asking reasonable questions.
If you watch the video you will understand why the judges didn't buy her argument. The cop was out of control.
@@sampleowner6677 I did, before she spoke her first word, the looks on the judge's faces told me how they were going to rule in this case, and they showed her no mercy throughout the hearing. It was glorious.
@sampleowner6677 lol...why the fuk do you think they made this comment? Of course they undersrand....You're not the brightest bulb in the box, are you? 😂😂😂
That makes him an astute judge of facts.
She has the assumption that the judge is either stupid, or will simply go along with her lies.
Why is she screaming . The anger and rage is the same as the cops . They explode in rages . Seems to me police are looking g for excuses to murder or assault people . Just not safe driving .
it's the how dare you usurp my authority arrogance
Or for not licking their boots
It's never about driving safe it's to just assert authority. Because I've made many complaints about our sheriff's driving 85-95 miles an hour with no lights on and stopping at lights and stop signs because obviously there is no emergency call just tyrants doing whatever they please. They also drive while texting
Yea, she's not helping disprove the thing where sexists say women shouldn't be in positions of power because they are too emotional, lol
No one should have immunity , our police are out of control . 🐖
Not OUR police, THE police. They're not MY police.
100% correct,cops are at war with us.
No our entire government is out of control. We have seen over the last 30 years a transition from a republic to a fascist police state just like Germany was under Adolf Hitler. The patriot act and the Obama area police militarization has to be dismantled and the federal and local governments powers restricted to the way it was before 9-11 . As the surveillance state is beyond anything that should ever be allowed in a free society.
No they’re not. There a some bad cops but the vast majority are fine.
@@doc145 LOL! And where is your PROOF of this. I love interacting with BOOTLICKERS. What tastes better, black or brown shoe polish?
The assumption that a gun owner is automatically dangerous during a traffic stop is indefensible.
The cop is armed. The same assumption can be made of him.
@johnriddle3176 And the cops are too stupid to realize the hypocritical irony of their claim...
Especially when we have the 2nd amendment right and alot of states with open carry.
theyll do anything to not hold
rh shelves accountable
@@balla2172 Here's the thing, under the "Armed and Dangerous" precedent set in Terry V Ohio: if an officer has reasonable belief that a subject is armed AND dangerous, then they are within their rights to remove you from your vehicle (if applicable) and perform a Terry frisk without violating the 4th amendment. The major issue with this ruling however is that it's created a circuit split surround the phrase "Armed and Dangerous". To a reasonable person, the word 'and' in this context would be considered a qualifier, meaning that in order for an officer to perform a Terry frisk, you not only have to be armed, but also posing a clear and articulable danger to yourself, the officer, or the general public, which is how the standard is applied in most circuits. However in the 4th circuit for example, you have the US V Robinson decision, which applied the logic of "anyone who's armed is inherently dangerous" and therefore can be legally removed from their vehicle and/or Terry frisked without violating the 4th amendment. I can't remember off the top of my head which ones, but there are at least 2 other circuits that apply the same logic.
Listen to counsel immediately start sputtering and stammering as soon as she realizes that all three judges aren't having any of her BS
I was a Road Officer for 12 years, and had to go thru Federal Background Checks for 30 years for my other work...The Officer clearly was clearly stirring up the confrontation.. Actions like his, treating the public this way, especially a person such as this Security Officer, who in order to get his job and carry a weapon had to go thru a damn good Background check, creates the animosity other officers nationwide are having to deal with today. Officers like this, are creating problems for other Law Enforcement everywhere. This Officer put the Driver in a WTF mindset being treated this way.
I might JUST be a high pressure pipe welder making around 130,000 a year which isn't very much really, but I will always be able to say that I do NOT have a job of lying through my teeth every day in order to pay my mortgage. I can go to Church and feel good about who I am and what I have become .... and I have NOT become a professional liar in order to drive a Mercedes. ... I'll keep a clear conscience and drive my Acura TL.
This is the first time I’ve seen a comment like this on one of these vids, and I think u raise an excellent point! These lawyers are actually very well behaved. U should see the thousands of losers who practice in the family courts and have no morals or principles.
@@fatherinexile I am addicted to educating myself on Canadian Law pertaining to police interacting with citizens. I have about 10,000 hours of reading and watching.
I first became aware of the "lying" method when educating myself on investigative interrogation techniques used in interrogation rooms.
I read that a cop can lie to you constantly, as long as it's not coercive. Then I read that all police officers in training are not only taught to lie to citizens, but it is encouraged as a means of extracting evidence...that is when I lost all respect for law enforcement.
It has gotten to the point that I can no longer find any data to expand my learning curve as far as police to citizen interactions....I've reached the end ...I'm getting to the point now that just for fun, I am memorizing the RCMP Code of Conduct Violations from their policy booklet ... now that is an addiction I have for sure.
RCMP Police Act:
Part IV: Code of Conduct
Section 37: Responsibilities
A thru H
I like E because it scares new recruits that are too green to speak up when falsely detaining someone .. for example:
I was stopped because the cop thought I was getting ready to drive the car after drinking, but it wasn't my car, he had the wrong person. I told him I will not provide ID unless arrested, he would arrest me, would not explain why I'm detained, but held my arm, so I could not leave, which equals physical detainment.
I said to the young female recruit: Did you get a good mark on your final exam from the Academy? ... Would you like to further yourself in the field of policing? ...then you better get away from this man who is training you, because I have no choice but to submit proper complaints about him AND you to the Police Commissioner's Complaint Department tomorrow.
She got all spooked and say What did we do? ... I said, he is violating my civil rights by detaining me without explaining the reason for the detainment promptly, as explained in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms of Canada, Section 10 (A), and Section 10 (B).
She said, but what did I do? .. .I said under Section 37 of Responsibilities, subsection ( E), it states ...It is the responsibility of every member to ensure that no unlawful act by ANY member is concealed or allowed to continue. I said your partner is breaking the law by violating my Civil Rights and you are doing nothing to stop it, so I have no choice but to file formal complaints against you tomorrow ....she drags the cop over to the side of the car where I can hear them and they have a little chit-chat, and then they just get in the car and leave without even making eye contact with me.
THAT never would have happened if I had not read and studied Canadian Law as much as I have. I am very glad that I know my rights inside out now.
Bravo my good man.
If your going to brag about being so righteous you should be forthcoming for how horrible you used to be, I don't know YOU but I know people and ain't 1 of them perfect.
@@howlinwulf Thank you for your brief but kind words Sir.
May I ask ... Are you the Howlin' Wulf at the summit of a mountain, or rather … Are you the Howlin' Wulf that enjoys listening to "Smokestack Lightning" ? ...lol
Cop had an attitude from the start and escalated the whole situation!! This man will win and he'll sue but, once again it's the taxpayers paying the bill !! Total insanity ! 😒😒😒
And the taxpayers should go to their elected city council and demand that they get the police department under control and they should be electing a new prosecutor that will prosecute a cop for these felonies.
tax payers will not pay if judgement is given to remove qualified emmunity the cop will.then he may go after the city as well but the cop will pay his bill
@@hnelg the cops rarely have to pay their own bills.
And the union will push for promotions, instead of a counter action
@ned6938 this is true but if he looses his qualified wmmunity he's wide open for a law suit circut court ruled against the cop the appeals court seemed in the man's favor as well that's why the cop appealed to beat a law suit.if he looses qualified emmunity he gets sewed that's how it works if he keeps it that man can sue the state which he will sue both anyways I'm sure
If you havent watched this body cam it is absolutely heartbreaking. Both these cops should be in prison. How this lawyer can sleep at night defending any part of their actions is unbelievable.
Where is the bodycam footage of this
Where is the video of this
@@ambertrenchard0313 ruclips.net/video/r_BL0WetZRw/видео.htmlsi=182Rqmi7r0lCJPCq
Too bad youtube stopped allowing links...
Everything RUclips does seems to suppress the truth...
They hate the truth...
Money is how she sleeps. She makes lots of money. Some people are just greedy to the point of sinful...
Don't you just love how she talks about how many cops get shot and assaulted on traffic stops but fails to mention how many civilians are assaulted and killed by cops, which as we know is a much higher figure, the hypocrisy of the argument beggars belief.
Police are "civilians." Civilian means non-combatant. Police are not military.
10 cops per year.... OVER 1200 CIVILIANS have been killed in a year where NO weapons were found.... Seems like WE THE PEOPLE are being HUNTED....
She also gave those figures in a vacuum. It's one thing to say that 10 officers get killed each year. Makes you say wow, that's a bunch of officers. That's until you see that there are over 700,000 officers, which actually amounts to approximately 0.001%. It's not even a blip.
Or that being a Pizza delivery guy is more dangerous
Can you point me towards the statistics that claim civilians are assaulted/killed by police at a higher rate than police being assaulted/killed by civilians?
End qualified immunity and Terry v Ohio and Pennsylvania v Mimms NOW!!!
This is why we should NOT have qualified immunity at all.
In my country there exists no qualified immunity for police we have very few issues with police violence, if complaints are made they are refereed to an independent body to investigate.
👍
She's just as insane as the officer she's defending. I just watched the bodycam footage and she's lying her ass off
No she is doing her job. Which, in this case, is fighting a fight she cannot win. But it is her job to do this. And the job of the judges to pick her reasoning apart.
@@Chr15T I'll go look at the footage. She has NO authority under the umbrella of her zealous defense of her client to lie to the court. Interesting armchair exercise.
@@Chr15Timagine your job was licking boots on the state’s behalf..
@@Chr15Tit is not her job to bring up cases like this this is a waste of the taxpayers money her job is to filter out cases
where u find the footage please
When an OFFICER loses his QUALIFIED IMMUNITY he should also lose his accreditation!!!!!!! If a court rules against his QUALIFIED IMMUNITY THAT IS THE COURT RULING THAT HE HAS KNOWINGLY BROKEN THE LAW!!!!!!! I myself beleive QUALIFIED IMMUNITY should not exist!!!!!!! Ignorance of the law is no excuse should be exponentially true for anyone who takes a job enforcing,prosecuting or judging the law!!!!!!!
Also, decertified
#FACTS
This happens all of the time. Cops, most of them from what I've seen, shouldn't be officers at all. Saw one the other day where a cop was trying to arrest a kid walking to work at night with a backpack on. He grabbed him from behind and body slammed him onto the asphalt. The cop just suspected that he might be someone that was breaking into cars and just body slammed him. The kid had no idea what was coming.
Qualified immunity is an important thing, only an idiot would want it gone.
@@Beast_from_the_middle_east only a cop or their family would want to keep it around!!!
Wow, total respect for these judges.
If traffic stops are SOOOO dangerous, then maybe The State should stop doing them so much? 🤷🏽🤷🏽
BINGOOOOOO
Coos don't serve & protect. They harass, maim,incarcerate, abuse & destroy.
I agree wholeheartedly! Cops off traffic duties and a traffic corps installed?
If they say they fear for their life they shouldn't be cops. Cops should be fearless, right?
@@geraldross967 Citizens should be fearless? Can we use that as an excuse to slam or kill any armed cop?
law enforcement, in general, want to claim that "this job is so dangerous". ok, it can be. so is construction work, so is crab fishing, so is walking through the woods.
They VOLUNTEERED for this job, and intentionally put themselves in danger. Why? Step away from danger into a safer spot and regroup. Live another day. Law enforcement routinely escalate situations and use that to facilitate making charges and arrests.
Statistically, Law Enforcement is not one of the more dangerous jobs, and the vast majority of LE fatal incidents are the result of their own driving.
I'm a Brit Army veteran with 22 years service I knew when I took the Queens shilling that being a soldier was dangerous
So do cops
They make their job dangerous. A smart cop doesn't go hands on 5 times a day. They all need serious temperament and communication training.
They are “trained” to see anyone who isn’t a cop as the enemy.
My words exactly!!!
There should never be any qualified immunity
No, there should not. In fact, its illegal under the constitution (the right to redress shall not be infringed/restricted). In simple terms, if some government representative did you wrong, you have a right to challenge the legitimacy of their actions. QI just goes to prove just how corrupt our system has become.
Great Job Judges
Why did no judges bring up the fact that the stop itself had 0 merit to begin with?
Great point!
Because the lawers didn't.
Because those black robe pimps run the pigs, and the DA. That's why.
Watched judges to the same on a different case involving a criminal cop. Cop broke the law judges said nothing. @@ned6938
I think that is a missed opportunity due to the attorney bringing up how dangerous traffic stops are. Why did they stop someone for no reason & immediately antagonize the driver if it’s so dangerous?
If the cops were not following written procedures, they should not be allowed to use taxpayer funded defense
They're following verbal orders as are their supervisors this is how the police state gets implemented
Probably required by their union contract.
Finally! Judges calling out officers on escalating the situation.
The cop messed up so badly that the attorney cannot coherently defend his actions. Sad day for her.
@Jared..the sad part is that the tax payers are paying for the defense of these cops as well as any settlement if and when they are sued. $$$$$$$
I feel sad she's so sleazy
and yet she still tried. disgusting breed
@@Gnome_DominoShe’s not sleazy. She’s zealously advocating on behalf of her client. It’s her job
@2ndchance431 yup just add it to the tab. The tab being the national debt
That defense attorney is trying to sell some oceanfront property in Arizona, and she didn't even show the least amount of respect possible. If I were on that court, she'd have been serving 30 days for contempt. Lying to an appellate panel is grounds for disbarment, and she did just that, lied multiple times.
Thanks for the comment, I was wondering if I was the only one who noticed that she is a lying itch with capital B.
Nicely put. I was trying to think of a way to sum up her behaviour. Thanks, you did it for me!
Correct, she is trying hard to get the cops actions justified!! She knows if she doesn't get the cop justified the police dept will get a new lawyer and she does not want to lose that check every month fron the city otherwise she is dependent on her clients which might pay and might not pay or take years to pay her bill!!!!!
It isn't illegal to aggressively defend someone, even with exagerations.
@@dh891 exaggerations, not lies!
IN OTHER WORDS THE JUDGE WAS BASICALLY TELLING HER TO STOP MAKING SH*T UP AND EXAGGERATING IT 🤡....😂🤣😂
Proportional to the treat... what a bunch of crap--nice to see judges not buying her BS. Settlement should have been much higher.
When did our justice system go from having a good defense to trying to subvert the law as a defense?
When you elected Trump and and his alternative truth.
That's a damn good question.
Immediately upon its implementation.
Always been this way for some of us
@@patrickkelly7085it's gonna be fine.
He will be back again.
Maybe you will lose your mind and won't know the difference.
If I were you I'd be mad.
her arrogance is staggering. aggressively demanding from the judge to provide relevant cases to prove her case. the judge isn't on trial, you are lady
And there it is, "EVERY COMMAND", NOT A LAWFUL ORDER.
How dare We The People question our employees UNLAWFUL DEMAND.
How dare We The People actually know our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND USE THEM.
The F.O.P. and it's standing army are here to subjugate us. It's just that simple, when has an occupying army EVER been reasonable? Never is the correct answer, with NO exceptions.
Well said Buffy
Yes, I am a cop your constitutional right mean nothing to me!!!!
Exactly. Dogs are given commands.. citizens are not.
The attorney needs to experience being “ripped out of her car” to understand her bias
I can't believe the judges allowed this defense attorney to claim that "traffic stops are inherently dangerous" based solely on the claim that "2000 officers are injured and 10 are killed each year". There are 20 million stops each year. Those are odds of 2,000,000-to-1 against death and 10,000-to-1 against injury per traffic stop. I feel like I face more danger just brushing my teeth.
if you mean the female its called the prosecuting attorney
or the male defense attorney
im really confused who your talking about help me out
@@luci-fer250 There is no prosecuting attorney here.. you have a plaintiff and a defendant. The woman is the attorney for the cop.. she is defending him in this case.. so in this case she is a defending attorney.
There is the old adage, "Numbers do not lie, but people do." And people sure use numbers to lie, especially in politics and law.
I read that pizza delivery drivers' jobs are 233% more dangerous than being a cop.
Hell, even a simple school crossing guard's job is 317% more dangerous . . .
If they’re that scared they shouldn’t be a cop.
Sick and tired of police getting hugged by prosecutors and judges,supreme court needs to get rid of qualified immunity as easy as they implemented it
Yes and then you would see a lot less of this kind of behavior from cops!!!!!
Yeah!
Judges should take it back as only applies to elected officials.
Qualified immunity is meant to provide protection for those officer who make mistakes but do so as they perform their duties "in good faith" and nothing less.
It's strange that the "in good faith" part of QI doesn't get argued more. Telling someone you're going to "rip them out of the car" (instead of "we'll have to remove you from the vehicle") shows intent, mental state, and the low level of professionalism prior to force being applied. When force is applied and it's a full body slam into pavement it should be questioned if the officer was still acting "in good faith" of his duty.
If it IS in good faith of his duty, then we can expect this type of interaction with the entire department. That means every officer will need to undergo new training and new departmental policies written, as that's clearly not what the citizens have hired them to behave like.
If this is NOT in good faith, no QI protections.
Forcing them to pick one also then forces them to choose whether they are going to back this officer.
another perfect example of police officers failure to de-escalate
It's always scary when the suspect is more calm/rational than the "trained" police officer.
This case is the perfect example of why everyone should contradict the brainwashing we received that handing over your identification when asked , which is to consent. We Americans do not have to consent at any traffic stop , we have a legal right to assert our 4th , 5th , and 6th amendment rights verbally , you can not be legally detained or arrested for asserting your rights. If a police man wants any information from me , he'd better have a warrant with my name already on it , in which case I would probably want to get to the bottom of why there's a warrant for me , absent a warrant , no info will be provided by me , once you have asserted your rights , no commands from the officer are lawful.
Where's the case that says they have to de escalate???
@@Internal_Investigation it's in their training and just like the oath they took, they ignore it
Actually I think this is a case where the officer "escalates" the situation. There was no need to de-escalate in the 1st place.
The cop after pulling him over should have said I pulled you over for "the offence" give me your lic, reg, and insurance. The cop asked if he had any guns. The guy said he owns a gun but does not have it with him. Instead of doing the correct thing the cop gets a bad attitude and escalates the situation. The cop needs to find a different line of work, perhaps flipping burgers
I went and watched the video after hearing the woman defending the officer. How can she can sit there with a straight face and say that this happened because of the drivers actions is absolutely INSANE! That officer needs to be locked up. Absolutely insane. The guy was explaining everything to him was getting his insurance and license together. And he was absolutely out of line. And not only needs to be fired he needs to be jailed. This went waaaaaaay left waaaaaaaay too quick.
It's her job to argue the defense of the officer, and she at least does a decent job considering it's basically impossible for her to defend. The only leg she has to stand on at all is that the driver turned and reached for something after things had escalated quite a bit. She isn't lying about the situation or making up evidence. The judges did see through her attempt though and I'm glad they denied the immunity claim and it ended up being settled by the city.
That attorney for the cop is a liar and barely held onto her composure. She is a lot like her client. 😡
The best part was when the judge said you client was dumping on him from the get go.
Yep, he pulled the bully card early and used it during the whole encounter.
I saw that as well, she was SO flustered and angry the entire time, and to me…that was weird AH! I get some lawyers being passionate about their cases, especially when it is clear cut and they should be winning, but you’d literally have to be insane to watch that video and conclude the cop was justified, either that or you’re sleeping with him and she has that kind of emotional involvement from what we can see of her. It’s just weird as hell.
And she apparently loves the taste of leather. Yes boot leather.
After Leo incidents like this so they get drug tested ?
No that is her job. She supposed to defend her client even though her know that her client were wrong.
Watching this video, while at an older age, it has never been more apparent that everyday citizens are at a unparalleled disadvantage when in these situations. Cops get something like a cumulative ground hog day ability to hone their corruptive and abusive skills with every interaction. So they know what to do and when to do it and use manipulation to entrap citizens who don't have any clue as to how to deal with these abusive cops. Citizens only get one chance to survive these situations where as cops get constant passes and blue line sympathizer to help get them evade accountability. This is a sickness within that community of sickos and this behavior borders on psychopathic tendencies... Sad that our system of protections protects these low lifes vs everyday citizens not posing any threat...
So to summarize, the problem is in the system which assumes the cop is right from the start?
Well people need to stand up and basically not shut up until this bad cops get fired. They cannot arrest us all and our best place to deal with this is the voting booth and taking some time to learn about the people you vote for. It would help if you know what the limitations and the person job you are voting for. For example there so many thing the Presiden with immigration without Congress passing laws to back them up.
@@krane15 The problem is the people who administrate the system; people who are flawed, petty, and biased.
This is exactly how the government works. Slowly corroding and working to take our rights away constantly and always only one step closer to an authoritive distopian society. You never get those rights back.
So, putting your hands up to signal "I'm no danger", (as humans all over the world do), is "a reach"? If police in America are thrust into a state of perceived peril at the sight of someone puuting up their hands, why do they ask people to do just that in already tense situations? If that is what this lawyer is basing her appeal on, she might as well have stayed at home and made a pot of soup.
Lady Lawyer there would be well served to get her own attitude in check before calling out someone else for theirs, especially when speaking to a panel of judges.
LMAO!!
Agreed!
I agree with the comment. She sounded and acted as though she was arguing with her teenage daughter or a worker at a drive-in window.
thats what I was thinking , she being very pushy with the judges
Her only defense was the “reach”. And yelling it a hundred times doesn’t make it justified.
Cop escalated from the word go. He's not a reasonable officer. There was no reason to order him out of the car. What a stupid woman. There's a threat of force!
She's doing the job she's paid, a lot, to do. That is to emphasize what helps,her client, and diminish what does not. Lawyers don't care what the actual truth is, just what parts of it help them win. That is not being stupid.
@@MGower4465 She's annoying the judges, because they know full well what she is saying is inaccurate because they have seen the videos, and annoying the judges will hardly help her client, or her next case. The lower court has already found against her client, using the same evidence I assume, and now she seems to be making a different argument.
Final moment of this video: Judge realizes that the reach is instigated by the cop's threat of force and the driver's desire to film to prevent that force.
The mental gymnastics these people go through to defend their criminal enforcers is absolutely abhorrent and will not be forgotten.
She is a lawyer, she has to do her job. They understood that she probably doesn't believe what she's saying herself, but if she doesn't do that, then he will later on be able to claim ineffective assistance of counsel. So it's good that she tried all those arguments.
@@volodyanarchist True but it still just comes off as deception
@@volodyanarchisttruth and justice are more important than anyone's career. Remember, the Nazis also justified their actions by saying they were just following orders.
@@volodyanarchisthe can claim that as many times but it doesn’t take a genius that he will lose
She's a fantastic storyteller/liar!!!
The lawer is sure trying to force her lie on 3 jurists that highly outclass this goon.
She proves lawyers have no ethics, morals or values.
I agree with the judges opinion BUT the duty of a lawyer is to get their clients off or the best out come for her clients. Morals and ethics come first before they take the case.
Money is ethics morals and values
Everyone deserves a defense. She had nothing to work with. Her client was so guilty and it was on video.
@@jaimemcdanieltravels Her client is also a piece of shit.
The point of a defense lawyer is to make sure the prosecution has BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that you are actually guilty, not because they defend you or your actions.
A threat created by the officer.
The largest danger was to the officers ego “get out or I’ll drag you out”
These DA's supporting police brutality just astounds me.
This attorney ought to be embarrassed. She can't possibly believe the officer didn't instigate the violence because his ego was hurt.
She literally said that the officer has "the right and duty to unquestioned command of the situation." regardless how our wrong or tyrannical he is. Un friggin believable.
She’s just a mercenary in the court working for the mercenary on the street.
The old furtive movements nonsense. He was reaching for the insurance that the officer asked for. The officer was the one who was a dick. A citizen attempting to assert why he's been stopped exercising his 1st amendment. At no point did I see him attack them. He was passively resisting at most.
Furtive movement = sneeze at the wrong moment and u are dead!
This channel is awesome. I love how you post the actual event in the description so we can understand the situation before we hear arguments. Really great stuff 👍
Thank you! It’s great to hear such nuanced feedback! I’m happy to keep making the effort to find these for folks like u who appreciate them!
I’ve been saying for years what we need is to be listening to the oral arguments at appeal.
Kudos bud. This channel is the bomb.
"Passive resistor." Kek. Also, these three judges are only grilling her because the orders came down the police was getting canned.
Special kinda hell for lawyers like her!!!
The only thing cops say these days is we are scared. It's been proven that the pizza delivery boy is in more danger and they don't cry for pizza boy safety, and they can actually find the right house and cops can't.
Good point!
😂😂😂
Right on comment, if the police pressure is too much go for uber driver of pizza delivery, oh, what's that? No perks, no damn fine salary and great benefits. Cops ususally get a bunch of over time plus side hussle jobs that don't show as salary, events, filming locations et alii.
Officer safety is an excuse.
If you are that scared why did you become a cop, should have been a hair dresser or something in that line of work!!!!!
I'll never forget a quote from a law enforcement supervisor, "Always go home at night, comply or die". They will kill you, even if there's no actual threat to officers, based on the good old adage, "For officer safety". This is taught through all training levels and they just deal with the legal issues later on. We, as the public, are absolutely unsafe out in public and in our own homes. So much for being free citizens.
These Judges are certainly ripping into the lady Lawyer… brilliant.
Still not enough in my opinion. She should have been censured.
Hopefully these judges are just good judges and not anti police californian type judges
@@sandrasweeney798 Censured? What? They asked to hear her arguments. The lawyer is doing her job, and on top of that she may not even necessarily agree with the arguments she is presenting. It is her job to best represent her client. The lawyer isn't to blame, the police officer is. His actions were so reprehensible that even a good lawyer couldn't effectively defend them.
@@michinwaygook3684
Aye the cop was also doing his damn job that he hates just as much as he hates the ppl he sworn an oath to protect & serve
Keep posting these. They’re fascinating and very informative.
Thank you! I’m glad you are enjoying them and are learning from them!
End qualified immunity ASAP!!!
She says that "traffic stops are inherently dangerous." BS, a few dozen incidents compared to millions of stops is a very low ratio. Most interactions are due to police escalations.
Typical melodramatic Karen.
Not all. For instance there are cases where the driver has a warrant and is willing to hurt an officer to stay out of jail, usually this isn't even recognized by the officer until he gets the license and such from the driver and runs it. Still I'd say that there are far far too many cases where the officers escalate things. Part of me figures that it is because they have things going on in their personal lives that impact their attitude during work. But why should we expect retail workers to not have an attitude with customers and not expect the police to be the same and to deescalate instead of escalating situations. Police get training in de-escalation, retail workers don't get training and often seem to be held to higher standards by their employers.
Just looked it up and police isn't even in the top 20 most dangerous jobs, fatality rate of 14 per 100000, and that includes car accidents and and non violent causes of death such as having a sudden heart attack while on duty or anything else, it's actually the exact same fatality rate as my job as an industrial maintenance technician, and my job definitely isn't dangerous, these numbers come directly from OSHA who keep pretty good track of on the job injuries and deaths, and is literally in the top 10 hits when you google most dangerous jobs, so feel free to fact check of you want.
@@Greg1096 Disclaimer: I'm a retired LEO from Ca. (In fact from a noted aggressively proactive city/county), so I'll always lean toward giving the police a great deal of leeway in most instances. Not so much as an ignorant/blind bias, but more from an understanding of the many, complicated nuances of the job that must be processed in split seconds of time. I also am very critical of awful, thuggish, unnecessarily violent and ignorant police activity. In this day and age there is so much video of interactions that are available there are plenty of situations I've been extremely angry and disgusted over.
All that to say that statistically, as far as on the job deaths, police work doesn't come close to the most deadly work. There is a difference between deadly and dangerous though. A big reason why it isn't as deadly has to do with training/officer safety advancements over the past 40+ years. I don't know where it would land on the list, but I would bet even active duty military personnel (as a whole) over the past 40 years wouldn't top the list either, but none of us would argue a lack of danger. Danger's deadliness gets mitigated through training, equipment, trauma care advancements. Instead of deadliness, measure your line of work's number of job related, disabling traumatic injuries and prevalence of severe psychological trauma or even just life expectancy overall. My point is simply that fatalities is only one statistic that doesn't provide the true picture.
Btw, the officer in this case was 100% the problem here and shouldn't be in that line of work. I understand why qualified immunity exists, but it is entirely too broad, and this officer doesn't deserve to claim it.
My 2 cents anyway.
Plus how many motorists are assaulted or murdered by officers on a traffic stop.
The woman lawyer is assertive to the point of being angry. Pleading her case changed to nearly daring the judges. That’s the rebuttal ass chewing she got.
Does not mean she is wrong, She is supposed to do everything she can but the problem is the judges hold the power whether right or wrong which is why they do not sit level with everyone in the room.
She lied over and over, and she knew that she was lying. The judges knew that she was lying.
@@JohnDoe-jq1br The judges are also going off of opinion and their interpretation of the video, of the lawyer, and of the law. The whole legal system is based on opinions.
@josephhodges9819 she was wrong. The judge said so.😅
@@boiledbread9937 That is strictly the judge's opinion and nothing more.
I just watched the bodycam video of this and that officer was wayyyyy outta line! I hope this guy wins and that officer is charged.
The cop clearly said what’s the attitude about when Andy proclaimed his innocence and the cop attacked him.
This lawyer is doing a lot of reaching. 😄
Her circular BS arguments are trying to get some common thugs with badges off after violating rights and terrorizing the public. These are road pirates and not police. Furthermore I am politically as far right as they come, but I believe in personal rights all the way to infinity and the only way to square that with this situation is to say the officers are WRONG. THey are to protect and serve not harass and enslave. It does not matter who they are dealing with. Shitty behavior
I mean best comment on here lol😂
lol brilliant
she is a karen
@@charleslucas5955 - Like someone's conniving crazy shrill ex wench LOL
The officer must be sacked, prosecuted and jailed.....for life.
I've now watched a few of these, and it's a small sample size... that said, these cases make the point of why government attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, DAs, etc, rely on "running out the clock", making a defendant keep spending money on attorney fees until eventually agreeing to a plea deal. In none of these videos does the police's, city's, attorney come across as particularly good at their jobs, it seems they're not generally relying on skill, law, facts, they're relying on "I have an unlimited budget and will spend the opposition into oblivion".
See also the James Flynn case, the "prosecutor " of Rittenhouse, I think Binger was his name... even the incompetent Lytitia (sp) James, AG of New York...
Excellent point! Thank you!
You failed to mention a glaring lack of honesty, or any morals or ethics. That is the major problem.
If cops knew that if they unnecessarily escalated a situation they will be accountable for anything that happens after and will not be represented by the city that behavior would stop overnight!
Which is why every family needs an attorney in it.
_________________________
When your kids are young, make them take a nap every day, if they aren’t tired allow them to take a book into bed but they have to go to bed, but no toys or iPads, phones, etc. my mom did this with us and we all read and do well in school. Then guide at least one towards a law degree, because at some point in time someone in your family WILL need a lawyer, it’s better to have a free lawyer in the family who cares about the client than to have an expensive lawyer that cares not if the client goes broke and still gets nothing from it…..
The Justice system is a joke
@8:10, funny how the lawyer for the cops has learned to stretch the truth just like the cops do.
She thought it was going to be a slam dunk LMAO! She walked in there thinking, "well, these judges will side with me. I'm standing for a cop! No way they're going to go again what I say!"
Well! Fortunately, you got some smart, objective judge's, who actually looked at the totality of the circumstances!
Common sense judges. Why cain’t we have duplicant judges across the nation?
We probably do! But most, if not all, of the other appellate circuits do not video record! Cameras in ALL Courtrooms now!
dingdingdingdingdingdingdingding give this man a gold star
(i didnt know if you smoked so i said the first thing that came accross my marble trap)
Attorney Lori Davis, for the defense, eh? I did not know I could dislike someone so much in just 5 minutes. The judges are steadily telling her that's not how they see it, and she just ignores them and carries on.🤦♂
I felt an immediate distain for her as well. That said, she did what she is supposed to do defend the client, aggressively if necessary. Where I don't have to like her I do respect the fact that she is good at her job.
@@michaeldose2041 my thoughts and sentiments exactly!!
Yeah she is hurting herself more than helping!!!
@@michaeldose2041define "good"
The defence laywer proves the veracity of the old adage that "pets start to take on the personality of their owners."
Let’s hope this lawyer doesn’t become a judge
Remind me to never have a dark cluttered interior of a vehicle in Scottsdale.
You’ve been warned! 🔦💡🌞
Arizona as a whole is awful as far as Law Enforcement being criminals.
"What reasonable cop is going to believe him?" 1. There are no reasonable cops. 2. Apparently, they believed him when he told the cops he had a gun, but not when he said it wasn't with him.
The judges are ripping this woman apart.
This is an officer begging the courts to protect him from the lawsuit, which could Ibut probably won’t lead to criminal charges). But it will ruin his career in abusing people.
I doubt if he stops abusing people's rights, he is mad now, civilians better look out! I dare them to defy my corrupt ways, I wear a badge I can do what ever I want!!!
Officers lie more often than they tell the truth so listening to these judges is extremely frustrating, the assumption that LEO tell the truth is a major problem
Officers can lie to civilians, but not judges. Lying in court is perjury and is contemptible.
@@jonahzablow2132and never ever punished
"Officers lie more often than they tell the truth", surely this is based on some scientific data, could you cite it please?
@@fishbait9556are there any sources for data that proves they are honest?
@@JS-pe7uc I didn't make any claim, genius, the other guy did
If your going to pull a gun on cop at a traffic stop , you are not going to tell the cop that you own a gun or have a gun . This lawyer should be bringing that up. And these judges should have thought this.
If the cop was anywhere near as belligerent as his attorney, the cop was clearly in the wrong.
I know she was pressed for time, but dayumm!
The video is out there. The cop escalated the whole thing over ego: "How dare you question me peon, I'll teach you what happens". The driver got roughed up and lost his job, but ultimately won a settlement by the city.
The scariest moment you spend in time with the police is real. I was kidnapped by a Chandler AZ. Police officer, he got me while I was going for a walk in my gated community where I also worked as a “guard” for employment. It’s really bad when criminals have badges, I can’t get any help, now I deal with the retaliation, for the complaint I filed. I feel terrible for all the victims of corrupt authority, and what’s sad about this situation is the number of innocent victims by the hands of the authorities we were raised to trust, and respect. Good luck everybody.
I know someone who was retaliated against and even after being forced to move , they were retatiated against in their new home out of the county .They should have moved out of state . But it was so evil that so many were involved ....No help ...
You tell the average American this story an they won’t believe it. But I have seen countless videos an i believe your story. It is so upsetting that justice is a myth
"kidnapped", huh? Could you describe what happened or should we just take your word for it?
@@Harlem1mentalityyup, back the blue until it happens to you.
How did you escape your attacker?
Traffic stops are only as dangerous as the officer makes it.
There are thousands of videos here on youtube showing people how to respond to traffic stops. DON'T TALK TO COPS. KEEP YOUR HANDS ON THE WHEEL.
The problem I’m having is the lawyers who defend these cops on taxpayer dime , is we pay their salaries for guns , car , why do we have to pay for the attorneys ,,,,… And these lawyers argue for these bastards,,,,,I say end qualified immunity let them pay there own lawyers as well , like rest of the people …… they get lawyers and qualified immunity is why these things happen .7. Years of abuse 7 years of intimidation 7 years trying to be the ROCK
exactly we have to pay the lawyers when they falsely arrest or if we try to find him sort of justice for their crimes
@@andykrueger7564and we pay the settlements. It’s a lose,lose,lose for us not to mention losing our rights
100% correct!!!
All of this was preceded by the officer opening the car door of the victim, which should have been a violation immediately by the officer. Once the door was opened, qualified immunity should have been denied.
Agreed! This was a traffic stop. No reason to open citizen's door!
“I’m going to hurt you if you don’t get out of the car”
*hurts him when he doesn’t get out of the car*
“your honor the officer is entitled to qualified immunity because he didn’t know what he was doing was wrong”
These judges give me hope that someday law enforcement will both be changed and more importantly, held accountable for their relentless assaults on citizens for minor traffic infractions, speech, and asking simple questions. Treating every citizen as if they are criminals must be stopped!
WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY IGNORING VIOLENT CRIMINALS
That's not the cop,
Hopes that they will start holding them accountable thebvourt system should not be in charge of weather or not police lose qualified immunity that should be decided by a board of members of the community no different then jury duty a random pool of people should be called upon to hear the facts of what happened and it should be the public that makes that determination because the way things are going soon the public will stop not fighting back against this shit which they should be able to do if police use force in an unnecessary or overly forceful manner the citizens should be able to defend themselves to the same level as we would if it weren't police
This whole case is predicated on the fact that this lawyer and cop feel like they should be able to hurt people and violate people's rights without any kind of accountability whatsoever. Thank the Gods these judges saw straight through their bullshit.
Agreed
We need judges like this that can see BS when someone speaks it right.
I have seen plenty of videos showing an officer standing right up against a motorists door , demanding they get out of the vehicle . If you open the door , even in compliance , and hit the officer , they can claim that you assaulted him . If the officer lets you open the door , but steps up into the opening , as in this case , when you step out and bump into the officer , they can claim assault . The testimony given by both the attorneys and the judges implies that the officer manufactured the reason to assault the driver to me .
Oh this tactic is taught at the academy, next time you are stopped you will immediately jump out and lick the cops boots and kiss his ass, that is why they do this!!!!!
This happened to me but worse. The cop opened my door hot himself and immediately arrested me. Currently going through a lawsuit cause Chick-fil-A caught it on their cameras
AZ has constantly shown they have the worse cops in the country. The amount of outrageous videos that constantly comes out that state is astounding. They make NYPD look like the crown jewel of policing and civil decorum with civilian interactions.
True watch Direct D
Yup. The mesa PD on what they allowed those 2 cops to do after the daniel shavier murder flushed all my faith down the toilet.
Got evidence withheld, allowd the cops to be re hired just long enough to fill out ane submit paperwork for retirement due to "ptsd" and now they both collect a check for life.
Sad state of affairs. If they wanna watch us with their cameras everywhere we go, we shall do the same.
I would be frightened to get out of my car with how violent the officer was with him.
Me too!
I m ready to buy my camera for my truck and get my own body cam too!!
@@ephraimcamacho9600 Don't forget a radar detector.
Better to get out of the car. Like the defense lawyer was saying the officer can far more easily justify using force while you are in the car. Also I've seen lots of times where people are pulled out of cars and it's almost always more violent than when they are already out of the car. If he had held up his hands and said he was going to get out of the car there is still no telling what the officer would have done to him, but it probably would have been quicker, involved less force, and would have looked far worse for the officer.
@@michaelmurray6197That cop came up to the car claiming that the guy had an attitude, that he did not. The cop was looking for a fight from the start. The cop didn't give the guy room to get out of the car or much time between yelling at him or try to explain anything at all. It's very confusing and stressful for the person, but for the cop it's just his 5th stop of the night.
Sure it's better to get out of the car, but look at it from the perspective of a guy who has no idea why he's even involved with the cop.