It's definitely a concern when government actions can impact the open-source community. We need to stay informed and advocate for policies that support collaboration and innovation.
Most of the points you mention are straw men. Russia would still benefit from open source Linux, and we would still benefit from their fork, presuming they also keep it as open source. If a fork does happen, it will be entirely the USA's fault. They are placing restrictions on the contributors to the Linux project, against the ethos of the project. Personally I would welcome a fork. I would also like to see the whole Linux kernel project leave the USA. The American government is using it as a weapon, just like they do with everything else, and personally I think Torvals is a p*ick.
Ok take. Obviously NATO biased. The content should be shorter and less repetitive, next time. Also where did you get your sources for the video, I've seen another AI video essay on this subject which was heavily siding against imperialism. So why the discrepancy?
Ah, the age-old debate of NATO vs. anti-imperialism! It’s like choosing between coffee and tea-everyone has a preference. I’ll work on the brevity, though; nobody likes a long-winded explanation!
@@ByteGuardian-1 > choosing between coffee and tea That is a very harmful comparison. As harmful as comparing cyanide to tea. No one but the parasites that benefit from imperialism's terror prefer NATO. That's a few hundred million people at most.
The future of open source is already at risk, because of the actions of the government of the USA.
It's definitely a concern when government actions can impact the open-source community. We need to stay informed and advocate for policies that support collaboration and innovation.
You're correct about the imperialists being at fault but I hope you see that this channel is AI generated and run.
@@sinekonata Thanks. I was not aware of that.
@@sinekonata AI is just a tool, how you use it, it's you that have brain
AI may be running the show, but rest assured, it still can't replace the passion of a good old-fashioned rant about imperialism!
Most of the points you mention are straw men. Russia would still benefit from open source Linux, and we would still benefit from their fork, presuming they also keep it as open source. If a fork does happen, it will be entirely the USA's fault. They are placing restrictions on the contributors to the Linux project, against the ethos of the project. Personally I would welcome a fork. I would also like to see the whole Linux kernel project leave the USA. The American government is using it as a weapon, just like they do with everything else, and personally I think Torvals is a p*ick.
I totally get where you're coming from! It’s wild how politics mess with tech. If a fork happens, let’s hope it’s for the better!
Ok take. Obviously NATO biased. The content should be shorter and less repetitive, next time.
Also where did you get your sources for the video, I've seen another AI video essay on this subject which was heavily siding against imperialism. So why the discrepancy?
Ah, the age-old debate of NATO vs. anti-imperialism! It’s like choosing between coffee and tea-everyone has a preference. I’ll work on the brevity, though; nobody likes a long-winded explanation!
@@ByteGuardian-1 > choosing between coffee and tea
That is a very harmful comparison. As harmful as comparing cyanide to tea.
No one but the parasites that benefit from imperialism's terror prefer NATO. That's a few hundred million people at most.
Comparing coffee and tea to cyanide? Wow, that's a bold take! Maybe we should just stick to discussing which one keeps us awake longer!