MAJOR Threat To Google Search (SearchGPT vs. Perplexity vs. Google Search)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- After extensive testing, I've concluded that Google Search is up against significant threats to its cash cow. Here's why...
Join My Newsletter for Regular AI Updates 👇🏼
www.matthewber...
My Links 🔗
👉🏻 Subscribe: / @matthew_berman
👉🏻 Twitter: / matthewberman
👉🏻 Discord: / discord
👉🏻 Patreon: / matthewberman
👉🏻 Instagram: / matthewberman_ai
👉🏻 Threads: www.threads.ne...
👉🏻 LinkedIn: / forward-future-ai
Need AI Consulting? 📈
forwardfuture.ai/
Media/Sponsorship Inquiries ✅
bit.ly/44TC45V
Are you using AI Search (Perplexity or SearchGPT) more than Google Search now?
I am
I've been using Perplexity about 80% of the time. (still getting over the habit of using Google)
My 80 year old mom uses Perplexity over Google as well.
I use pages for the class I teach. I started a collection as well for a different class.
Made my own 😅
Perplexity a bit more than Google these days.
Im using perplexity
I like Perplexity a lot. I like that you can shift between modes, including writing if you don't want search. In the premium version you get to choose models as well.
@gball8466 Wrote "I like Perplexity a lot. I like that you can shift between modes, including writing if you don't want search. In the premium version you get to choose models as well."
I like Perplexity a lot. I do not use the pro version.
I am pretty satisfied with the results.
But once in a while its logical becomes stupid and I have to point it out to it. "Yes my apologies! I can see that you are superior"
I didn't realize you can do non-search too. You can click on focus to do so, and select writing. Thanks!
References are very important, especially if you need to track down the source to verify the information. Thank you for pointing that out because 4o and its predecessors have a pretty big issue with not handling references very well at all.
Perplexity Pro easily takes the cake
But why pay for it, why not just use the free version?
@@enermaxstephens1051 Well, it's better. You also get access to regular gpt and claude free to switch
@@enermaxstephens1051 exactly that's what I wanted to tell
@@enermaxstephens1051 The free version of Perplexity comes with 5x Pro searches per day. If you need more Pro searches than that, then it makes sense to pay to get better results and advanced features like voice functionality.
How could you possibly evaluate perplexity without getting the pro account. It is night and day.
Stop watching, he is just a Openai promoter and a noob !
most biased ai channel ever
You aren't using perplexity PRO right, to what extent do you think that would change things and overall results?
It changes a lot depending what the search is. Some things pro won't give a much better answer, because the answer itself is simple. I used perplexity to find me compatible PC parts for a pc I found in a dumpster. Gonna hopefully get it going this weekend
Also very curious of the answer
Why you didn't push Pro Search button in Perplexity?
To try and make OpenAi look better
Because I do not have the cash!
@@ZergRadio you get 5 pro search for free per day
For many queries there is not a clean advantage of the Pro Search. Pro Search is super useful where is more analytical workload to be done, for simple search and resume the vanilla is more than enough.
Yeah you need to redo with pro as it does query planning and expansion
You overlooked something with Perplexity: it gives its sources. And you can continue the conversation.
I always use Perplexity unless I need a link to buy a product or a website.
It really useful to read manual and summarize it. It made me learnt the octatrak or MC-707 a breeze, or compare products (ie: field recorders), You tell him your need and it helps you.
It's like having an assistant make the search and summarize the answer. Probably better, let face it, humans too "hallucinate" too.
Indeed. People freak out about LLM hallucinations however we are forever plagued by "human error" - it's nothing new haha.
4:59 - he compares the sources feature for both.
if you like sources then a traditional search engine like google is by far the best lol
Having the Pro version of Perplexity makes a big difference.
Also, you can zero in on the information you need with follow up questions which would otherwise be accomplished tediously with combing through 10 blue links.
You miss a lot the "related answer" of Perplexity... those are damn good follow-up search
+1 to this. if only there would be a way to 'navigate back' or through those 'related' then ++ :))
Print screen 😃
@@mihaitanita agreed. hopefully they'll add that feature.
doesnt google have the same thing
You should also try the pro search in perplexity in case it gives you better answers
For sure
At 10:00 of you clicked the source link at the end of the answer i think it's giving you the correct video. The video/images on the right are kind of like the images you get in Search GPT
Also on the location issue.(Movie theatre) Your test is not fair across the board. Searchgpt is using any info from your account. Perplexity can do this as well but you need to explicitly give that info in your settings. As far as Google if you are logged in, you will get better results.
The power of Perplexity AI's "Collections" feature is brilliant! Look into it and how it can be used. It deserves a video of its own.
It would take google all of 2 hours to add that "feature" as a "search with AI" button. Oh wait, why are you ignoring the AI Overview?
It makes NO sense to "ignore" the AI Overview @6:23... do you ignore the AI from the other 2? If they "have" the feature, and it only requires you to keep on, then ignoring it is very unfair. Such an artificial barrier created. It does AI search... you can't just "ignore" it because you want to make 2 other engines look better.
Nevertheless, it is cool to see some of the different AI search engines out there. I ran the same question in 4o, and it gave pretty much the same results for ip question.
Thanks for the comparison.
well, google would then show you black lesbians if you search for Vikings, that's why they are doomed.
Google and Bings implementation of AI search is clunky and it has pushed me to Perplexity.
google AI results still suck
google search can’t handle complex multi item requests like “ what was the acceptance rate at Harvard the year Jamie Dimon graduated” that would take google 3 separate searches, chatGPT alone can do it in one, searchGPT is even better
I was just thinking about something similar because I've noticed that a lot of major brands right now have a search engine that can use AI to search the internet and give relevant results. At the moment and for a little while I've been using brave browser and they, not long ago, added the, search with AI feature right beside the search bar. I think Google Gemini is doing this iPhone is doing this Even Microsoft edge has this. There has been quite a lot of talk about how Google is going to get taken down because of AI search when the user I'm responding to just commented about how easy it would be for Google to just either add the feature so it's there all the time when you search or do like brave browser and just have a button sitting there if you want to get an answer with AI and AI search results. Google isn't going anywhere right now because one can't even use the search engines in this video without being subscribed to a club for the monies. So most people aren't even using it, they're still using Google or other regular search engines they've been using all along but now with added features of AI so what's the point in going over to these other, "new", search engines when their current search engine is facilitating the same thing? Some people have hyped up this AI search thing like it's going to take down Google tomorrow and after tomorrow there's just going to be no more Google. That is preposterous. The only thing this is doing is getting clicks and comments and reactions from people which is what the RUclips algorithm loves and is all about. It's controversy. Someone hears Google is in trouble or Google is on the verge of getting taken out and everybody in there Mama's uncle is going to tune in to find out how.
Miss reminds me of a video I seen last night for a couple of seconds because I quickly realized what it was but anyways, the title had something to do with a guy named Derek from vise grip garage here on RUclips and the title was something about Derek getting exposed. The only reason why I clicked on the link to see what it was all about is because I have seen hundreds of disguise videos and I have not got nothing but the most genuine reactions and content from this person. He is very engaging, funny, smart and an overall great entertainer. He knows his craft inside and out and teaches along the way with every step and every screw nut and bolt but anyway. The title was misleading because there is no dirt on Derek. there is no scandal. The video just went on to talk a little bit about Derek's life how he got started on RUclips and how he has expanded into a few other channels along with one of his son's channels.
We live in very slimy times where people will slant a title just to get a click because they can't come up with a genuine title and let it be because they don't think that would garner enough attention so they have to be dishonest and misleading using trickery to get people to click. It's kind of disgusting what people are willing to do. I think this is some of the reason why comments on RUclips are so Kurt and crappy sometimes. It starts to make a person numb to it all when they're fed nothing but deceit and lies from regular people claiming to just be trying to make it. It's like the restore videos on here. Some of these people are so hard up they are fabricating the whole thing. These people will make something look like it came out of a landfill after they just walked out of Walmart from purchasing the item just to make a restore video because they can't find anything to do legitimately or they can't do it at all, the right way. I mean, what do you do when you run out of landfill looking stuff that can actually be repaired? I guess you fake it till you make it 😂
there is open source alternative if you wanted to try
I've fully moved to perplexity for ALL my sesrch needs
I was expecting video on perplexity
Great video Matthew! Also, the main reason why the searches probably weren’t as thorough and in-depth was because pro search wasn’t enabled
10:32 "Google really has an advantage..." Yes, they own RUclips and the full up-to-date video list, more than we can even see. (including unlisted videos)
Not to mention the entire SEO industry is basically dedicated to feeding Google information about websites, almost exclusively.
@@NeorecnamorceN Yes, and that is a whole realm unto itself, because of multiple forces trying to game the system in their favor (to get traffic they don't deserve). So quality becomes an issue, so you either learn to discern or your results (quality) is reduced. (which partly answers the question of why Google search has been in such decline for the past decade).
The list of speakers for Dreamforce in SearchgPT was from 2023. As I was there in the venue. There was a 2 hour waiting time to get to the auditorium to see Sam Altman and 3 hours wiating time to see Matthew mcconaughey. I did get to see Dr.Fei Fei Lee.
There are also Aria the ai integrated into opera, and copilot integrated into edge.
Honorable mention: Perplexica the local ai search engine.
The links are important because these are the people who work hard to produce content that GPT and Google use.
The most challenging thing to test is new regulations. Perplexity is the best one I tested, but they still struggle and make mistakes. When I ask for the most current regulation on a topic for a specific country, I don't always get an accurate response
Why are you ignoring the Google AI results? That’s not a Labs feature anymore. It’s out of beta and on the default Google now.
This man hates Google !
Most biased ai channel.
if SearchGpt said totally wrong thing this mqn will say its okay but if Google do even 99% this man will say thats definitely a fail !
Same with Gemini, never learned to use Gemini multiple times. asks for help in comments, everybody says how to use that, never read the comments. again make a video about Gemini and again fail.
stop being a OpenAi d sucker !!
Well it's not yet , as long as it be globally available on Google
I've been testing SearchGPT for a week, and it's a solid beta. Like you said, the key challenge is knowing when to use an LLM, AI Search, or traditional search based on the query. It's like the early days of search engines, where people switched between different search engines based on needs, preferences, and performance. Once AI search improves, it'll be as ubiquitous as Google.
I still remember websites that offered metasearch. These searched in several search engines at the same time. (1999)
Nothing stays constant forever so today it’s not Google but tomorrow it could be. These are the joys of tech.
Well, he did kinda skip over the fact that Google already added AI search as well, at the top. And it felt like a silly thing to do. Like "oh yeah google also has AI search, but if we pretend its not there, then it's worse than AI search". Like.. wat? The thing is that Google still has a lot behind them. All these perplexity and searchGPT things are also powered by some more traditional search engines in the backend. And it's even likely that they are using Google's search in the backend, or maybe Bing or something, depends on what deal they have. And then process results with AI and pull relevant info. Maybe with some caching. I kinda doubt they made their own crawlers. Crawling the entire web and storing and caching results is not an easy or cheap task to do at such scale. So I seriously doubt that they went for it.
Plus google does have their own great AI models. So I think Google search is not going anywhere. It just adds AI and gets better is all.
Google has 1 thing going for it: Google Maps. Google owns Maps and Waze. The only viable alternative is Bing maps. The other competitors (Open Street Maps and related apps, Mapquest, and Apple Maps) have downsides. Apple Maps has live turn-by-turn navigation but it is only available with the app which is locked to Apple devices. OSM and Mapquest have apps but their maps (particularly the locations of businesses) are often out of date and do not offer live traffic.
We don't need a separate SearchGPT. It should be integrated with ChatGPT. When I ask about real-time information (like current news or sports results), ChatGPT should automatically function like SearchGPT.
I like Perplexity but I have found it sometimes makes things up. With Chat GPT I have always gotten more correct answers.
Well tha depends for mi experience using daily also got have the tendency to hallucinate or mix things up
Perplexity has Pro Search which you should have used to give it a full fair chance. To use unlimited Pro Searches you do need to pay $20 a month but that would go towards your expenses for making this video, thus a tax right off. Also, it would have helped if you researched how each of the tools work in order to best know how to utilize the tools. Great video! Thank you!
Exactly, you’re using the free version of Perplexity and not their premium offering, which is far superior.
there is open source alternative
@@jacobcdev there are bunch of those… all which are far less effective.
@bsarel centralized system usually have better infra, decentralized open source alternative is more flexible, have you tried mindsearch ?
there are a few things that perplexity have advantage as a centralized system over decentralized open source alternatives.
* better GPUs and infra
* better caching
* closed end paid models
and the generation workflow is hidden so you do not know how the answer was created.
Perplexity as a research tool completely blows google results out of the water. Not difficult, Google is not even a search engine any more, its an ad platform with a few shithead subpage results from authority domains sprinkled in.
I appreciate you asking us to consider liking and subscribing at the end of the video. I can't count the number of videos I see with creators asking AT THE BEGINNING, before even seeing the content. At the end is both logical and courteous. +1
Should’ve asked Grok too
I'm flying to europe question was horribly constructed, Europe isn't a country bud, there's a ton of them IN europe, it doesn't know where you want to go.
SEO-Expert here. I haven't tested Search GPT yet, but my opinion is, that Search GPT might have an upper hand when it comes to customization. ChatGPT does an outstanding job by providing users the option to add additional information to our backgrounds, expertise or information we expect. But I think Google has the upper hand when it comes to understanding the search intention behind the query. Probably mostly because of all the user data to all the queries, they might have collected for so many years. The Image Sidebar is a good example of this. If the user doesn't need this kind of information, Google will usually not show this piece of information.
You can only deliver the best results if you understand which kind of answer / information the user expects.
That is only true when the user history is relevant, and sometimes you specifically do not want user history interfering with what results are given.
Also, you can use an llm to search using the google apis if you want history correlated.
Different tools for different use cases I think.
Lastly, the relevant user information that can fuel some surprisingly good results can be built up pretty quickly. I think diminishing returns sets in pretty quickly once you get past basic interests and high level demographics
"Tell me about Smith Predictors in Control Theory". When I do this the AI tools were able to find better sources and seemed to actually read the pdf's it found and use them in the summary provided. The nice thing is that Perplexity, SearchGPT, and Google are not mutually exclusive. When hunting information, we can use different tools to "dig deeper". My first stop is Perplexity. If I don't find what I need after a couple of prompts, then I move to Google.
But Google search is free while searchGPT costs money. Certainly that matters.
Morphic ai thank me later
@@trikosgr9334 its paid
Google won with most recent data. because most site have them index and optimized for google. or any other search engine. If the AI can access that maybe game changer
As long as results are all over the place I wouldn’t consider AI Search a real threat for Google. As we still have to validate each and every result, we simply don’t know which one is realy better…
There's a notion that the web will die because nobody will visit websites, they'll all be using ChatGPT to search, and it occurred to me that maybe the web of websites will be replaced by a web of AI models, all talking to each other, all specialising in different areas, all trained by their users, so you'll ask your AI assistant a question and it'll go off and ask other models for the answer, and maybe you'll have to pay 0.001 cents for each answer
damn that doesnt look too far fetched
It's a shame you didn't test a pro account on perplexity. It's a lot better than the free version.
Bruh, Matt... You DO HAVE PEROLEXITY PRO l. you bought a Rabbit. It came with pro lmao
I've said this EVERY time you've talked about it. LOL!
@matthew_berman
@matthew_berman
How do they compare to bing chat?
Your thumbnails seem to be all created by 14 year old.
Brilliant 14 year old
Sure. Every thumbnail be 🤩, 😮 or 🤯
facts cant stand em. biggest clickbait/sell-out account i've seen since i started following the whole AI movement
Try searching something controversial or politically incorrect. That's the real test.
I don't understand why someone named it "Perplexity"... Aren't we all searching for answers and truth? Who wants a confused search engine?
Perplexity == "inability to deal with or understand something complicated"
Yeah i dont blame Google for slowly rolling out AI search results, using and looking at perplexity, the amount of hallucination and wrong answers, makes me think things arent ready yet
The thing about AI search is that you can just talk to the AI. I recently asked: "there's a kind of flooring transition specific to exterior doors. it goes immediately underneath the door but isn't weather stripping. what is this called?" Perplexity answered, and I said, "I'm putting in new flooring, and need to put it underneath the threshold. this threshold seems to be metal with a rubber strip in the middle. can you either tell me how to remove it or point me to videos that show how to?" Got a great answer, and finished my floors. Google would have been pretty useless for something like this.
For specefic answers. RUclips is also a great source for answers. I find sometimes I use different options depending on what I'm looking for. Pretty cool times we're in right now, so much fun!
I don’t understand why this is any better than just vanilla chatGPT queries? Aside from the UI presentation just slightly different.
Gives me similar vibes to the chatGPT plugins that were briefly hyped last year as ‘the new app store’ and quickly faded into obscurity.
I thought so too and then I started using perplexity. It is like asking an intern to do some research on a topic and get back to you, but it does look at 15-20 websites and summarizes in 15 seconds or so. Not always perfect but leaves sources most of the time, and you can follow up w different questions.
Thank you for showing us how SearchGPT isn’t as useful as Perplexity.
One thing to take on consideration: If you don't show the links to the websites, you'll kill the internet. (Why should I do a website if I have no visits?) If you kill the internet, there will be no more new content made online and you kill the whole purpose of online search. So they MUST continue to show links in the results (if not it's not a search anyway). Until we're all replaced by AI and there is no need to make new content online...
Why would anybody use a search engine where they have to check if the results are hallucinations.
Yes google is done, perplexity beats them in every way. After using perplexity for a couple years now, I have zero desire to sift through google's links.
I would have like to have seen Co-Pilot also tested, since it's like the longest available AI search engine to date.
I use Perplexity Pro for most things right now. The ability to pick the AI model to use as well as image generator is awesome.
As an Aussie, pronunciation of Melbourne is "Melbin" - it's very British in a way, the second syllable is greatly shortened. In fact, as an American, you may extend the 'i' in Melbin, so from an American's perspective, it would be more like "Melb-n", does that make sense? It's just I know a million Melbournians would make a big fuss about it, lol.
I think you go with a 6.7L Cummins turbo-diesel. You get 400hp with and insane 1,075lbs of torque. But if you will have more weight which might help in some towing situations and might not.
I'm about 5 minutes in... I agree about the images. They just seem like a distraction and a waist of page load time, although it would be nice if there was something to click, to quickly show them, whenever they're needed. I like how they've kept it nice and minimalistic too, just as clean and simple to comprehend as ChatGPT.
Seems like it will be a lot easier for Google to add Ai search versus the others adding all the benefits of Google
OpenAI and Perplexity should pay you a fee for your tests. Because they could improve their AI based on the results and your reviews.
prediction as soon as an AI search is competitive with google, google will swallow it whole.
Perplexity paid version allows you to choose GPT as a model. It would be funny if they used searchGPT itself
6:00
why didn't consider AI Overview or SGE when you compare Google with AI search? this whole video is a joke fr 😂
The question comes in, how many of your "tests" were made up by machine learning itself trying to get humans to be its agents.
I don't find perplexity accurate, but other influencers like to mislead us so they can create content
Haven't used Google search in 4 years, never felt like I'm missing anything
Inspirational! There’s more to come.. blessings
Booking...
Google can do bookings better because they have integrated an end-to-end travel provider like Sabre into their product line.
These APIs are expensive to use because of how they are licensed.
If Sabre (et al) were to make a deal with one of the AI makers to implement their API as tools/functions inexpensively, they could compete with Google in that space.
By "they", I mean "we could compete with Google in that space".
Comparing any search engine to Google is almost pointless since Google basically owns the entire SEO industry. Websites go out of their way to make sure Google has all the latest info on their site and are coded specifically for their crawlers.
Should really be comparing them to Google circa 2004
I mean. Comparing free version of perplexity with GPT doesn't feel fair. I mean, it's so much better on pro with better models
I know that things can change, but I do remember listening to Sam Altman in an interview saying how much he disliked all the adds that come up in searches, he was asked about adding ads to ChatGPT.
My biggest "problem" is: Should I wait for SearchGPT or get Perplexity?
I have every faith that Google will respond and stay very relevant in this space. Nothing is “over” other than being able to rely on certain RUclips videos to have a base goal to inform the facts without bias, conscious or otherwise.
Great video, omg, totally gonna subscribe, amazing, best ever, solved world hunger and also perpetual motion, like totally…
Google is now on the defensive, which is the worst position to be in. Despite having the technology, tools, and user base to lead in AI, they took their advantage for granted and are now scrambling to catch up.
They didn't take it for granted. Their ad model was making so much money they couldn't give it up so easily. Now they are being forced to.
Give them 6 months
I tend to doubt with youtube, maps, etc users will be able to lose google. But yeah, remember altavista? Now where did I leave my cane
Just like yahoo... their days are numbered too
Google = Search Engine
Perplexity AI & SearchGPT = Answer Engine
You missed out on Kagi. It's better than both searchgpt and perplexity
I like it as well, all my pages are ranking unlike in Google
It would have been good to include Bing Search/Copilot in the test since its a more direct competitor to Google search that uses AI models to dig the data out from the internet.
I love searchgpt. It’s quick and concise, especially when I know I might be navigating multiple pages to find the gold.
Still need to check every single answer you get somewhere else, because little shit is lying.
I hope you love wrong answers too 😂
If you can't evaluate if the responses to your questions are correct, your questions were the wrong ones.
Most suggested search queries are analogous to comparing pounds to gallons. Web search is not supposed to target formulating answers. This is a task of chat bots.
After watching this video, I tested Google Chrome with A.I. imbedded in their search.
It's better than I thought. And the ads weren't as intrusive as I expected. But in all honestly, I prefer using numerous search engines to make sure what I want to see isn't being censored.
Perple ity also let's you enter sources you want to search, so it's great at browsing a site for what you need.
Why no Bing+Copilot?
I resized an apology letter because it's not available yet in my country. Yeah!
Very questionable that you didn't turn on Perplexity's "pro" feature when the button to do so was sitting right there. You're not allowing Perplexity to fully shine by doing that. If the version of SearchGPT that you were given access too here ends up being a paid service, then this comparison is entirely unfair to Perplexity.
Next time you don't use a key feature, please acknowledge why you haven't done so. A lack of transparency is not a good look.
I guess google can be good If you are an expert on structuring your search… although i find the list of links and relentless monetization to be tedious and annoying
It is not obvious how to get search gpt
I find perplexity the best, most straightforward , for general questions. One thing i like is i do not have to figure out how to structure my question… i can get an approximate initial question and then refine the question based upon the results if i need more specific information
I think it would be interesting to test the searches by writing them more like prompts. I wouldn't be surprised if that's where the real difference kicks in. google search isn't going to give you a better search because you wrote a well written paragraph, but I'd bet the other two would.
I LOVE how we're in an age where '10 blue links' is jsut way to slow... we're in the AI age now. We want and we want it - yesterday.
the Brave search engine has a built-in AI, which works very well!
A search engine is not a question-answer based system on general knowledge, LLMs alone can do that. I don't know about searchgpt but i know for a fact that perplexity rag through google's data via API. No Ai startup will ever manage to do search better than google unless they have more than 20 years of indexing the world information, google image, maps,lenz, news, shopping suite etc
I agree, I don’t have searchGPT, but perplexity is really good.
I believe 1 year is before my multi different countries company will buy ai computer and develop my system to understand why important
Perplexity all the way
Fantastic analysis of the AI search tools! Your comparison highlights some crucial differences. I’m interested in diving deeper into the user experience for both Search GPT and Perplexity. Were there any specific features or interface elements that made one tool more intuitive or effective than the other? How did each tool handle complex and nuanced queries, especially those involving recent events or intricate technical details? Did you notice any patterns in how they managed accuracy or relevance in their responses? Your detailed observations would be really enlightening. Great job on the thorough testing!
Were these questions generated by AI?
Because they look like they are asked by Claude (Opus 3.0? Sonnet 3.5?)?
Either that, or you, sir, have been chatting with AI for WAAAAY too long.... as have I (:
@@Outblaze7 Haha, it looks like we’re both diving headfirst into the AI rabbit hole! 😄 With our endless chats with these digital brainiacs, we could practically start our own support group-AI Anonymous! If our questions seem like they’re borrowed straight from Claude’s script, it’s only because we’re becoming seasoned explorers in this tech wilderness. Our pursuit of knowledge has turned into an epic quest, where every conversation with AI is a new adventure. Here’s to deciphering code and chasing down curiosity, one virtual dialogue at a time!
Excellent review.
I started watching this thinking of the idea that more big businesses than Google - their core product is at risk of becoming irrelevant.
Then you mentioned booking a flight.
I spent a half dozen years doing database dev work with the travel industry data.
There is no way those folks are giving up their data. That is how they make money - because they control access to the data.
The booking/ticketing/(human) agent approach we use today will not exist in 5 years as 50k travel agents are converted to agentic software.
Kind of a sad nostalgic feeling as I have my coffee and listen...
Hang on, "new" ip command in Linux. I've been using that for years, did I miss some new parameters or something? What changed from the "old" version and when?
Before iproute2 was in common use, you used different commands that were part of now-obsoleted net-tools. For instance, you could use `netstat` before, but that was replaced with the `ss` command. And instead of using the `arp` command, you now have to use `ip neighbor`. And you used to use `ifconfig` instead of newer commands like `ip address`. I don't know the exact timing off the top of my head, but I feel like iproute2 was being used in the early 2010s over net-tools.
6:00
You simply said I'm gonna ignore Google's AI overview and look at the 10 blue links, WTH? 😂
My head expert actually together asked that is important to be able to verify quality of my self made system to use ai sim ply how great you do this work!
I don’t think you can compare ai chat to a search engine. They’re too different. They serve separate purposes.
It would be like comparing a car ride to a ride on the city bus. Doesn’t make sense.
I guess it depends what you're using search for, but IMO, when I search with Google, I DO want a simple list of links to sites. I want relevant links to sites. I DON’T want a huge blurb of text explaining the thing I'm searching for. If I want that, THEN I use ChatGPT. So both Perplexity and SearchGPT fail in this regard. I want an AI search that uses AI to serve up incredibly relevant / spot on results for my query.
Perplexity is hopeless. It’s really bad.