#A321XLR
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- On Thursday 5 October, the A321XLR successfully completed its ‘early passenger flight’ demonstration with 167 employees acting as passengers. There were also 22 experts and 11 Airbus Flight Test and cabin crew members on board.
Test aircraft MSN11080 took off from Toulouse at 11:14 am and landed at 5:26 pm, after a six hour 12 minutes flight around Europe. The A321XLR was powered with 30% Sustainable Aviation Fuel, demonstrating action towards achieving the sector’s emissions reduction goals including in Airbus flight test activities.
More info: www.airbus.com...
I recently flown on the LR version. Initially I was skeptical about flying long haul on narrow body especially with 'plywood' style seat nowadays. But I was won over by how wonderful the flight is. If airlines get their cabin configuration right, it will definitely work. Airbus, you got a winner here 😀
Here comes Boeing's worst nightmare.....
boeing is boeing's worst nightmare
@@thabotshabalala7114sad but true
O don't think there are crying not think is a nightmare. The a321xlr would not complete eliminate it, just that they would be a marketing dominant. And what Boeing have for the narrow body market is still enough to go on. But a brand new plane is a brand new plane we all appreciate.
But I do agree there situation is really bad compare to Airbus all thanks to a leader that doesn't know how to guide.
@@thabotshabalala7114and the nightmare are McDonald Douglas executives who manage the company
Someday i will board an A321XLR and someday i will be the pilot. Love you Guys
Yes! For me, as a FO with jetBlue.
@@wadehiggins1114 Let's keep going friend, someday we're gonna get there. Cheers.
@@MarcosBay_ Don't give up! I know you will get there. I will get there also, thanks! 😉
Hell yeah!!
Goodness, WHAT DID I MISS?!? Love this plane
My absolute favourite plane ❤🛬🛬🛬❤
why do i like so much every airbus airplane?
What if airbus makes a wide body aircraft about the same size as the a321xlr or a little bigger that would be so cool
Can't wait to see thee flying all over.
Great airplane, do you need a single engine taxi as saw the last min when aircraft arriving the gate #airbuslover
You missed the opportunity to name this the Airbus A322
Airbus ❤
i love this video
What if an ACJ319 modified with RCT......
.....and in hence there will be an ACJ321XLR
AIRBUS 💎 👑 🇪🇺
Isnt Airbus just the best european plane company
It is at least at the moment the best plane company in the world.
Nothing comes close certainly not the joke across the atlantic😊
I mean, its also kind of the exclusive one, or at least the only one with large influence. Fokker, BAe and Dornier also make other aircraft in Europe but they don’t have nearly as much power as Airbus
On Airbus al maktoum airport✈
Why the a321 had only one engine working 🤔
One engine taxies are popular these days more efficient
@@Brandonplanespotter23 I'm surprised he didn't think of that lol.
Materials all kind for engineering must be over 20,000,000,000 petapetapetaPA to over 20,000,000,000 exaexaexaPA with bake all metals parts in heat metals factories 950 degree Celsius 6 weeks.
All aircrafts must be parallel elevators both, helm perpendicular and tail parts as 1 mm.
If all you want the high level, all jet engines (over 15,000,000 voltages, over 1,000,000 ampere with transformer for ignition fuel) air crafts must be with widest FRONT parts, elevators elevators, jet engines, tail with 1mm over 2 cm length chimneys. Turbo shaft engines with radiator should be same JET engines.
Helicopter must be elevators same width body,front couple wheels with single rear wheel.
All transports kind must be over 1g traction.
From
Engineering department all database
That's impossible, that's same story you don't like luxury hotel to sleep in but looking backdoor inn?
I was in school!
787?
A321XLR
Airbus a des PNC ? Je ne savais pas...
3rd :), Love u boeing
First 🎉🎉🎉🎉 ( again)
Oh, I don’t know…the A321 XLR certainly is NOT a replacement for the 757. Everyone focuses on range, range, range, that's not what is special about the 757, it's the performance, the wing. The 757 can take off out of SNA 5700' runway full people, fuel and bags/cargo and fly cross country, at high Flight Levels and with IFR reserves for two alternates. It can fly to all the mountainous cities such as SJO, GUA, BOG, UIO and many others. Except for the 737-700, nothing has the performance to do it without ridiculous gimmicks to make it out of those cities. Gimmicks like Packs-off takeoffs or APU-to-bleed takeoffs and performance so bad you have to leave with less than full passengers, fuel and/or bags/cargo, taking delays to take-off against the traffic flow due to runway downslope and/or wind restrictions on performance etc. Boeing and Airbus are so proud of their 737NG's, 737Max's, A321s, bragging those aircraft have fuel savings greater than 20% over the aircraft they replace. Heck, they have 20% less performance, so yeah that's where your fuel savings comes from. Also, the new 737s and A321s are so performance limited they're stuck at the lower flight levels unable to top the weather. This requires weather deviations equally hundreds of miles on a typical summer cross-country flight (there goes your fuel savings). So the A321XLR is no replacement for the 757, all they've done is add more fuel tanks to the A321NEO. Big whoop...But hey everyone loves the new jet smell.
The A 321XLR IS a replacement for the 757. Don't you think that Boeing wouldn't had launched a new 757 based on the 787 technology to enter the market ? Boeing is struggling to keep their 787 programm alive. The new 777-9 is already delayed and far far away from the first passenger flight for Lufthansa. They have simply no capacities right now to launch a new 757. That's the truth.
@nikolauswolff5791 I agree. But no 321 has the performance to match the 757. That's why companies continue to fly them. Especially in the U S. To answer your question, no, Boeing is now poorly run. They have made a series of major strategic blunders over the last 30 years. Their last decent airplane launch was the 777 (1995)!
@@6862ptc 😪
Range Boeing 757-200 : 7.300 km.
Range Airbus A 321 XLR : 8700 km.
@@6862ptcicelandair is going to replace its 757s by A321XLRs. The A321XLR can't replace the 757-300 and Icelandair has them
@@6862ptc if Boeing haven't made many strategic blunders, they could have been the first company. It's since Boeing ransomed mcdonnel Douglas that they make many bad strategies
Hopefully it's not cramped. Transatlantic in narrow-body economy sounds horrible.
Actually airlines can fit seats wider than any Boeing wide body in a typical economy configuration!
@@maxsaviation9512lol nope, recently rode on a 777 with 18.5 inch economy seats, wider than any a320 series plane and there are reasons beyond seat width that make wide bodies more comfortable than narrow bodies such as higher ceilings and a larger proportion of seats with direct aisle access.
Well not per se - you can configure the seats on a narrow body less cramped than on a wide body if you want. The 777 are often configured in a 3-4-3 configuration in economy - meaning a seat width of 17". The typical seat width in economy in a Airbus A320 in a 3-3 configuration (the only one around) is 18". What is more cramped?
@@lucius1976 I never said that a 10 abreast 777 wouldn’t be cramped. I said that there are plenty of Boeing wide-bodies with seats wider than the a321 in a standard configuration such as 767 and 9 abreast 777 and that other factors besides seat width effect how cramped a plane feels.