Nat's views on German engineering are so on point. Well said Nat. Richard. What a score Retropower. The total of all your team members continues to far exceed the sum. Thank you for this channel.
@@paulbriant4693 the 93 and 95 were meant to heavily based on the gm vectra running gear to save on costs but Saab changed so much of the platform. They even refused to use even the sat nav system because they believe their system to be better. Which having driven a vectra as it was badged here in the UK and having owned a 95 from 2000 to 2008 they were two very different driving experiences.
I'm glad I stayed to the end - the quality of Richard's work is simply outstanding. Although whenever he speaks, I just can't help but check that I'm not standing on plastic*... *one for the older film buff!
So much to take in. One of your best episodes yet, such a mad variety! I love the way the more outlandish projects (Saab and Allegro) actually end up making some sort of sense.
Nat I absolutely agree with your dismay at manufactured engineering faults , when I worked at a Saab dealer back in the early 2000’s I had a conversation with a guy at the academy who said it was a constant battle between the designers and engineers around trying to keep things making sense for those of us who have to work on the the cars post production… I presume it’s still an argument that carries on to this day !! . Great work you guys are doing 👍.
I agree totally I worked for seat for a number of years and the conversations we had with management about that subject was on a regular basis normally that they engendered some.thing then basically built the car around it, the fact that the offending part took a short time to change but stripping the car down to gain access and putting back together was possibly 6 hours
Ease of build at the point of manufacturing will likely be far more important to the company than ease of possible maintenance some years down the road. For a start they would rather sell new then fix old and have to consider manufacturing and carrying stock of all sorts of batches of components that may or may not be used. Ever. If you look at global vehicle regulations and the rate at which they change, manufacturers might conclude that regulation induced obsolescence will kick in within about 10 years even if they can make something capable of lasting 20 or more years with only regular consumables items maintenance for, say, 95% of the production and sales in any particular market. So if you design something for fitting in an obscure place but don't really expect it to fail within the expected service lifetime of the vehicle or the part of the vehicle it is fitted to (i.e. an engine that might be expected to require a significant rebuild or replacement by the time the component life is over) it would not be logical to place great emphasis on ease of maintenance for the component. On the other hand if the component or design (like timing belts running in oil?) is inherently flawed when put to everyday usage tests, one might make a different argument in full glare of the results of practical use. Back in the day many engines were thought to be doing well if they reached 50k miles without too much rebuilding work. But they were quite simple to work on. Now we expect much longer lives but regulations make them far more complex and so force compromise on matters of design. The result may be a greatly foreshortened life for the vehicle before it heads to the recycling facility. A difficult to change small component and the high cost of such work will contribute to that shorter life. The political rule makers may be delighted by such an outcome.
I can remember a friend of mine missing a game of Sunday football. SAAB 900, father making up for lateness with his right foot, a humpback bridge and air. On impact the car folded writing it off. 😂 Nats friend wasn't the only one to bend a 900.
Several thoughts on this week's wonderful episode. 1. WaSaabi is a fabulous name for a spicy Swede. 2. Bobby has been a tremendous asset with his tool/jig/pattern making abilities 3. Nat, I hope you've learned that you should never piss off a painter 4. I share your sentiment about German cars, having endured many codependent and abusive relationships with older German machines, I finally had to switch to Japanese for my daily. 5. Richard is a very talented and creative trimmer. I like a craftsperson who says "sure, no problem."
Thank you Nat for explaining about the air-con makeup,,,, and loosing me completely ten seconds after you started!! 🎵The knee bones connected to the thigh bone??🎵 I’m sure it’ll ALL fit together Nat 😂😂
So I did some looking into the DAZA to longitudinal gearbox, and as I suspected it appears to have the same difficulty as bolting the VW 2.5l 5 cylinder (an engine not sold in the UK but very popular in the US, and a relative of the DAZA). Namely the cam chain housing interferes with the top of the bellhousing. We generally solve it by cutting a piece out of the bellhousing, bolting them together, and fabricate an appropriate patch piece for the bellhousing and weld it in. The other main issue there, is none of the later 5 cylinder engines have a provision for an engine mount on the left side (when mounted longitudinally). Also a problem that's been solved, usually incorporating a mount into an aftermarket oil filter housing (iAbed Industries here in the US makes the filter housing) Might want to acquire the DAZA and start looking into the fitment...
We had a 1976 reg Allegro in Antique Gold (reg. WGJ12R) which was only 10 away from the Triumph TR7 in the Detectorists TV series (reg. WGJ22R) quite likely sold by the same Leyland dealership.. I was thinking perhaps a hint of metallic or flake might be worth experimenting with I don't have a clue about paint but it is a particularly revolting colour in standard form. Really looking forward to the mating of the SAAB and AUDI the ingenuity involved in the process is fascinating.
Very excited about the SAAB Audi. The 5 cylinder turbo engine has a DAZA code. My only concern is that the S4 front drive shafts emerge from the front of the gearbox and therefore the engines hang out over the front of the front axle. It is almost impossible to correct the horrendous understeer that results. Is there anyway you can push the front axle/ wheels forward to address this? May have been better to get a TTRS front subframe and mount the 5 cylinder transversely?
I think the new Saab/Audi project rendition is one of the best looking modified cars I've seen, the whole body proportions are perfect and I love the use of the classic Saab 3 spoke wheel design you've used but in a much larger diameter, really looking forward to seeing the build process and to see the finished item. I love the Camaro as I'm a huge fan of the 1st Generation Camaro but for me this Wasaabi project is my favourite car of all the fabulous cars you've built up to now.
Had a couple of 900 Turbos in the early 90's and enjoyed them both immensely. Lots of unique design features if I recall, and extremely comfortable for the longer journeys. The price of petrol today you couldn't use one as a daily driver.
07K is the code, presumably you're using the later aluminium block derivative? A VR6 would have been a good option too, again the later alloy block version is a bit lighter & they sound mega. I'm using an old style I5 20V in an older Audi project which is a bit of a boat anchor!
I don’t know if this is a sensitive question…. but I keep wondering how you seem to have gone full circle on the upholstery? It seemed that you started with Dean as an in house trimmer, then he moved to his own premises ? Seemed to start doing other work ? Then you brought Richard in .. as an in house trimmer with the plan to offer his services out for doing other work ? I suppose it’s none of my business - but I do keep wondering what the story is and whether you’ll still have work for Dean going forwards.
"Hey Mark, I have a B5 A4 needs an oil change. I hear the windscreen needs to come out to do so. You being a VAG master technician, fancy taking it on for me?"
A few weeks ago I suggested using the SAAB 900 cabrio body shell due to its reinforcements. The original 99 shell had the "A" pillars stand on the front wheel tub, making it much more ridged. Although they chopped it off to add a more cushioned impact absorption zone, SAAB tilted the cabrio's "A" rearward to once again align the pillar on a pad on top of the wheel tub. As an old SAAB aficionado/dealer, tuner and customizer, I've seen the results of violent collisions in which the occupants walked away unscathed. I'd rather be in an old, rusty 900 than a new plastic dispose-a-car if a collision is eminent.
Question possibly been answered before, the one of the project escorts is wearing an L plate as in 73 with the amount of engenering that’s gone into it, hasn’t it had to go for Iva as I should of thought as the allegros will
Would you consider taking on older cars with seperate chassis? Work could be done on the body while the chassis is modified to take substantially uprated running gear, suspension and brakes almost at the same time. I have in mind a Rover P4 with the engine and gearbox of an SD1 2600 or a BMW 5 series.
The Interceptors Hvac unit looks brilliant. Looks 'factory'. The Saab could really be your best-looking project yet! Gonna be stunning. Can I ask? If you are bining so much of the body work, what's the craic with the vehicles I.D? VIN, etc? Will it still officially be recognised as a SAAB by the powers that be?
No it’ll be put through an IVA (individual vehicle approval) test, and registered as a Retropower. It then gets assigned the reg plate of a brand new car; but you’re allowed to put any plate on car provided it doesn’t make the car appear *newer*. So the original registration plate number can put on retainer and placed on the car when the builds finished.
Saw a Mk3 E-type fixed head coupé on the North Western, heading into Albany, this afternoon - I'd forgotten just how small they actually are, compared to modern cars! Those drop-heads are going to be even smaller! 😎👍
I have allways understood that the front of the Saab 900 is designed to slide under the cabin section in a head-on. Apparently that produced remarkbly good protection for the dummies well above the majority of other breeds in that Era.
Man, I wish you guys were in Australia. I would love to come work for you. I do have a British passport. Do you need a fastidious, ingenuitive mechanic?
I think the guys need to address this matter at some point given the latest DVLA discussions on the current rules in place, people cannot keep sweeping it under the rug, it affects all modified cars including every road legal rally car and the likes of Singer, Alphaholics, Eagle E types etc etc, they simply do not meet the current UK registration rules for retaining the donor VIN and original V5 description. I am sure Retropower discuss it in depth with the owners prior to starting a project, and it is then ultimately the owners decision how they decide to put theirs cars on the road at the moment in the UK, post completion, but they could become expensive garage ornaments in the future.
Reply from @PS-ps8mo is very true. There is also an insurance issue: many people seem hope that insurers are nice car nuts but in the real world they do their very best to avoid settlements. A single vehicle inspection is also very unlikely to convince Police outside GB.
Manufacturers that dabbled in fully zinc dipping shells (before they realised it was bad for planned obsolescence) always seemed to go heavy on the overpaintable seam sealer, all over the place. Guessing part of that may have been related to that sponginess issue you described (although I’m guessing the dip process leaves a slightly thinner coating with less corner build up).
@@mattclarke6773 If they use a new Audi engine they can use the B2x4 T5 engines that was in NG900/OG9-3 that is a SAAB engine also even if it's a Triumph engine it was what the 900 came with which makes it a SAAB engine.
@@mattclarke6773 Also they created the B-engine TOGETHER with Triumph and later did the H-engine that was an evolution of the B-engine and was in the 900 by themselves in Södertälje Sweden.
@tetepeb yes, but they're 4 cylinder engines and I'm not sure if they reliably make large hp. A B235r engine can make big power but only with aftermarket/tuning company parts, then you get into reliability issues. A VAG DAZA 5 cylinder engine is probably best or newer.
@@mattclarke6773 A B204 makes 500hp without breaking a sweat or opening the longblock and with the money these projects cost, having it rebuildt with forged parts and balance and so one is not a big cost for reliability. We Swedes now how to tune these engines, even the old T16 engines can make good hp reliably but not as well as the T5.
The Sabb project...Cold War Motors just started on an other splice project to bring one old rusty car back using the chassis and part of the body of one and the upper panels of another..no fancy scanning over there just a different way and level of end product !
Hi Team ... brilliant channel .... can't believe you're not in the lillins of subscribers .... quick question if I may ... could you tell me a bit about your fly press ...it looks a monster ... what make/model is it please?
As always a great video, on the Audi donor for the Saab wouldn't a car of the Audi's age contain a fair bit of weld through structural adhesive in the underbody seams, are you not worried about losing this when you pyro it?
Unless you plan on the obligatory riot-gun mount, like the Police 900’s in Vail CO back in the 80’s, the build will be woefully incomplete. Just a suggestion.
Having owned and lightly tuned some 25 SAABS over 25+ years I tend to agree. The 9000 were excellent but towing g with them usually ended up with the rear end of a 9000 pulling off! That happened 3 times. :(.
I learned to drive in an antique gold allegro with the weird suspension that rose up when you got to the clutch biting point on hill starts, those Honda vtec engines and cool looks will be awesome but that Saab is my dream car a beautiful car with a brilliant sound and real power, I can’t wait to see it come to life
Go to the tool icon in the top right bar and turn down the playback speed to 0.5x … takes Nate’s explanations to a whole new and fun level ! You’re welcome 😂
Probably because the 9-3X is set up for a transverse engine whereas the Audi and 900 are both longitudinal mounted engines. And I imagine its just easier to get your hands on Audi body shells than for the 9-3
Audi's are a good car, but if that Saab was mine, I think I'd be sitting it on an M series chassis. . . @SavingSalvage will probably be interested in that V8. As for the Saab parts, advertise them, plenty folk out there give you good money for them.
Cal seemed a little different this week, hope you're doing okay bud? As ever.... I'm just flawed by the level of attention to detail, and skill level shown. The Retropower workmanship is everything I could ever hope to aspire to. 🙌🏻
Yes, you still get the galvanic protection, and the coating forms a “composite” as the powder coat soaks into the spongy zinc layer. It’s extremely tough stuff, and the rust protection is just unbelievable. A bit overkill possibly but better that way
i just want to say that you have a aswome shop and some awsome cars! im building my saab 96 2stroke (1963) into a classic gp car. but first it needs to drive :)
On the Jensen you have “notched” the chassis extensions/outriggers/jacking point arms for exhaust/manifold clearance. With the entire car supported by those jacking points (when the car is on the car lift) isn’t that potentially introducing a possible weakness/flex? Why didn’t Jensen do that if it isn’t a structural part? Exhaust/manifold clearance has always been an issue on the Interceptor, in that area.
Nat's views on German engineering are so on point. Well said Nat.
Richard. What a score Retropower.
The total of all your team members continues to far exceed the sum.
Thank you for this channel.
Project Wasaabi, someone likes watching Mighty Car Mods 😂
I hope nobody is ever comparing Retropower to the two comedians at MCM.
Immediately thought of them too. Their Wasaabi ate up a bit less money though.
@@freddofrosch1They called it upon them Wasaabi-ing it 😂
Same thought here😂
Unfortunately Wassabi was very poorly done. I did try to advise them but sadly they ignored everything i suggested. Paul @ The SAAB Clinic.
The Saab looks like it's going to be a stunning retromodded car just like the rest of the cars you build. I loved my Saab 95.
I've had 96, 99,900 and 9000 loved them heart broken when they stopped making them. Have not included vauxhall saabs, crap.
@@paulbriant4693 the 93 and 95 were meant to heavily based on the gm vectra running gear to save on costs but Saab changed so much of the platform. They even refused to use even the sat nav system because they believe their system to be better. Which having driven a vectra as it was badged here in the UK and having owned a 95 from 2000 to 2008 they were two very different driving experiences.
I'm glad I stayed to the end - the quality of Richard's work is simply outstanding. Although whenever he speaks, I just can't help but check that I'm not standing on plastic*...
*one for the older film buff!
So much to take in. One of your best episodes yet, such a mad variety! I love the way the more outlandish projects (Saab and Allegro) actually end up making some sort of sense.
That render looks amazing! Looking forward to this build!
Nat I absolutely agree with your dismay at manufactured engineering faults , when I worked at a Saab dealer back in the early 2000’s I had a conversation with a guy at the academy who said it was a constant battle between the designers and engineers around trying to keep things making sense for those of us who have to work on the the cars post production… I presume it’s still an argument that carries on to this day !! . Great work you guys are doing 👍.
I agree totally I worked for seat for a number of years and the conversations we had with management about that subject was on a regular basis normally that they engendered some.thing then basically built the car around it, the fact that the offending part took a short time to change but stripping the car down to gain access and putting back together was possibly 6 hours
Ease of build at the point of manufacturing will likely be far more important to the company than ease of possible maintenance some years down the road. For a start they would rather sell new then fix old and have to consider manufacturing and carrying stock of all sorts of batches of components that may or may not be used. Ever.
If you look at global vehicle regulations and the rate at which they change, manufacturers might conclude that regulation induced obsolescence will kick in within about 10 years even if they can make something capable of lasting 20 or more years with only regular consumables items maintenance for, say, 95% of the production and sales in any particular market.
So if you design something for fitting in an obscure place but don't really expect it to fail within the expected service lifetime of the vehicle or the part of the vehicle it is fitted to (i.e. an engine that might be expected to require a significant rebuild or replacement by the time the component life is over) it would not be logical to place great emphasis on ease of maintenance for the component.
On the other hand if the component or design (like timing belts running in oil?) is inherently flawed when put to everyday usage tests, one might make a different argument in full glare of the results of practical use.
Back in the day many engines were thought to be doing well if they reached 50k miles without too much rebuilding work. But they were quite simple to work on.
Now we expect much longer lives but regulations make them far more complex and so force compromise on matters of design. The result may be a greatly foreshortened life for the vehicle before it heads to the recycling facility.
A difficult to change small component and the high cost of such work will contribute to that shorter life. The political rule makers may be delighted by such an outcome.
How is it there is 10k views now but only a thousand likes, come people. Well done retro power quality cars!!!
I can remember a friend of mine missing a game of Sunday football. SAAB 900, father making up for lateness with his right foot, a humpback bridge and air. On impact the car folded writing it off. 😂 Nats friend wasn't the only one to bend a 900.
Several thoughts on this week's wonderful episode.
1. WaSaabi is a fabulous name for a spicy Swede.
2. Bobby has been a tremendous asset with his tool/jig/pattern making abilities
3. Nat, I hope you've learned that you should never piss off a painter
4. I share your sentiment about German cars, having endured many codependent and abusive relationships with older German machines, I finally had to switch to Japanese for my daily.
5. Richard is a very talented and creative trimmer. I like a craftsperson who says "sure, no problem."
I am a huge Saab fan but that “frankensaab ” is going to be an amazing car, can’t wait for the next episode
Thank you Nat for explaining about the air-con makeup,,,, and loosing me completely ten seconds after you started!! 🎵The knee bones connected to the thigh bone??🎵 I’m sure it’ll ALL fit together Nat 😂😂
_Eye bone / thigh bone!_
Columbo reference for the more mature viewer. Brilliant!
I guess the British summer is much like the Finnish; it's the best day of the year!
Indeed
Want to extend my thanks for the audio improvements noted these past couple of videos. Thanks!
Can't wait to see Dave get involved, his RS001 build is bonkers!!!
Richards new sewing machine looks mightily impressive for £12.50 off Marketplace! Nice buy Nat!
Marc is a VAG master? Doesn't surprise me. Lads like that typically know their way around a VAG, all the ins and outs AND ups and downs.
I still think it ought to be called Saaudi.
With how thirsty 5 cylinders are, naming it after an OPEC nation would be fitting.
PIF
Loving the sections on upholstery, keep it up.
I would love to see a whole upholstery episode on one of the projects
So I did some looking into the DAZA to longitudinal gearbox, and as I suspected it appears to have the same difficulty as bolting the VW 2.5l 5 cylinder (an engine not sold in the UK but very popular in the US, and a relative of the DAZA). Namely the cam chain housing interferes with the top of the bellhousing. We generally solve it by cutting a piece out of the bellhousing, bolting them together, and fabricate an appropriate patch piece for the bellhousing and weld it in. The other main issue there, is none of the later 5 cylinder engines have a provision for an engine mount on the left side (when mounted longitudinally). Also a problem that's been solved, usually incorporating a mount into an aftermarket oil filter housing (iAbed Industries here in the US makes the filter housing)
Might want to acquire the DAZA and start looking into the fitment...
A Saab900 with an Audi "angry wasp" under the bonnet - that's going to sound better than outlandish, if not stunning 🙂
We had a 1976 reg Allegro in Antique Gold (reg. WGJ12R) which was only 10 away from the Triumph TR7 in the Detectorists TV series (reg. WGJ22R) quite likely sold by the same Leyland dealership.. I was thinking perhaps a hint of metallic or flake might be worth experimenting with I don't have a clue about paint but it is a particularly revolting colour in standard form.
Really looking forward to the mating of the SAAB and AUDI the ingenuity involved in the process is fascinating.
Churchill diamonds looking great!
The Saab looks like it’s going to be amazing
Cant wait to see the process to get the finished vehicle
Keep up the fabulous work lads. 👍
Cal honestly Austin Retropowers Oh Behave baby.
Richard that is some ravioli stitching just like mama used to make .
You know when you’ve made the perfect cup of tea but can’t get round to drinking it before it’s cold. Nats piece today.
So impressed with your work! The level of commitment is stunning (for example the 3D/CAD work amongst much more etc). Greetings from Australia.
What a briliant episode - a superb array of skills plus some welcome insights into German engineering solutions.
Don't like the looks of Saabs, but THIS profile rendition on this week's top page, is STUNNING!
Very excited about the SAAB Audi. The 5 cylinder turbo engine has a DAZA code.
My only concern is that the S4 front drive shafts emerge from the front of the gearbox and therefore the engines hang out over the front of the front axle. It is almost impossible to correct the horrendous understeer that results.
Is there anyway you can push the front axle/ wheels forward to address this? May have been better to get a TTRS front subframe and mount the 5 cylinder transversely?
Loving the saab concept art ,its going to look and sound amazing -(we hope )
I think the new Saab/Audi project rendition is one of the best looking modified cars I've seen, the whole body proportions are perfect and I love the use of the classic Saab 3 spoke wheel design you've used but in a much larger diameter, really looking forward to seeing the build process and to see the finished item. I love the Camaro as I'm a huge fan of the 1st Generation Camaro but for me this Wasaabi project is my favourite car of all the fabulous cars you've built up to now.
Had a couple of 900 Turbos in the early 90's and enjoyed them both immensely. Lots of unique design features if I recall, and extremely comfortable for the longer journeys. The price of petrol today you couldn't use one as a daily driver.
Love watching Richard's block! Go the Wallabies.
Me: "Door" is a single syllable word. RetroPowerCars: "Doo-oo-oo-ah"
Saab renderings look amazing, will make one hell of a car
07K is the code, presumably you're using the later aluminium block derivative? A VR6 would have been a good option too, again the later alloy block version is a bit lighter & they sound mega. I'm using an old style I5 20V in an older Audi project which is a bit of a boat anchor!
Yeah they'd want to use the alloy block version, those old Saabs were lead-tipped arrows with their factory 4 cylinder engine in them...
Yeh first ! ☕️ in hand hope everyone is well 🇬🇧👍🏻 superb video guys as usual with some really cool projects , looking forward to progress ! 👍🏻😉🇬🇧
I don’t know if this is a sensitive question…. but I keep wondering how you seem to have gone full circle on the upholstery?
It seemed that you started with Dean as an in house trimmer, then he moved to his own premises ? Seemed to start doing other work ? Then you brought Richard in .. as an in house trimmer with the plan to offer his services out for doing other work ?
I suppose it’s none of my business - but I do keep wondering what the story is and whether you’ll still have work for Dean going forwards.
"Hey Mark, I have a B5 A4 needs an oil change. I hear the windscreen needs to come out to do so. You being a VAG master technician, fancy taking it on for me?"
I’m on my way 😂
A few weeks ago I suggested using the SAAB 900 cabrio body shell due to its reinforcements. The original 99 shell had the "A" pillars stand on the front wheel tub, making it much more ridged. Although they chopped it off to add a more cushioned impact absorption zone, SAAB tilted the cabrio's "A" rearward to once again align the pillar on a pad on top of the wheel tub.
As an old SAAB aficionado/dealer, tuner and customizer, I've seen the results of violent collisions in which the occupants walked away unscathed.
I'd rather be in an old, rusty 900 than a new plastic dispose-a-car if a collision is eminent.
Love the battery cosy 😁
Question possibly been answered before, the one of the project escorts is wearing an L plate as in 73 with the amount of engenering that’s gone into it, hasn’t it had to go for Iva as I should of thought as the allegros will
For the Saab project name, we kindly suggest Stig Carlsson or Eric Blomqvist.
anything but wassabi - name has been used at least 3 times on other peoples saab builds already
Would you consider taking on older cars with seperate chassis? Work could be done on the body while the chassis is modified to take substantially uprated running gear, suspension and brakes almost at the same time. I have in mind a Rover P4 with the engine and gearbox of an SD1 2600 or a BMW 5 series.
If that saab looks like them renders with that powerplant! Sign me up. Wow!
The Interceptors Hvac unit looks brilliant. Looks 'factory'. The Saab could really be your best-looking project yet! Gonna be stunning. Can I ask? If you are bining so much of the body work, what's the craic with the vehicles I.D? VIN, etc? Will it still officially be recognised as a SAAB by the powers that be?
No it’ll be put through an IVA (individual vehicle approval) test, and registered as a Retropower. It then gets assigned the reg plate of a brand new car; but you’re allowed to put any plate on car provided it doesn’t make the car appear *newer*. So the original registration plate number can put on retainer and placed on the car when the builds finished.
@Jonathan_Doe_ thanks bud
I am hypnotised watching these familiar cars being revised Engineering problems recognised Solutions devised Cheers Guys
Good old Harvest Gold paint. Was quite a colour spectacle on the P6 Rover 3500$ - stunning..!
wasaabi - what a nice nod to MCM
Saw a Mk3 E-type fixed head coupé on the North Western, heading into Albany, this afternoon - I'd forgotten just how small they actually are, compared to modern cars!
Those drop-heads are going to be even smaller! 😎👍
I have allways understood that the front of the Saab 900 is designed to slide under the cabin section in a head-on.
Apparently that produced remarkbly good protection for the dummies well above the majority of other breeds in that Era.
So jealous of the Interceptor owner, it’s going to be stunning!
Used to have a 900 turbo from 1983. It had a bit over 300hp on the wheels. Was a fun car
Man, I wish you guys were in Australia. I would love to come work for you.
I do have a British passport. Do you need a fastidious, ingenuitive mechanic?
I wish Australia had an equivalent workshop. Too many high end Australian workshops seem to only build a limited range/style/make of cars.
Diamonds look amazing.
awesome as usual , however , are Nats eyebrows growing at a silly rate , they are beginning to look like Dennis Healeys
😆
😂
Marc, it looks like that is one genuine Audi, at least it has the proper Audi oil leaks. But if you say it's a good'un, then it must be.
What happens to saab also the allegros regarding vin numbers ??
I think the guys need to address this matter at some point given the latest DVLA discussions on the current rules in place, people cannot keep sweeping it under the rug, it affects all modified cars including every road legal rally car and the likes of Singer, Alphaholics, Eagle E types etc etc, they simply do not meet the current UK registration rules for retaining the donor VIN and original V5 description. I am sure Retropower discuss it in depth with the owners prior to starting a project, and it is then ultimately the owners decision how they decide to put theirs cars on the road at the moment in the UK, post completion, but they could become expensive garage ornaments in the future.
Reply from @PS-ps8mo is very true.
There is also an insurance issue: many people seem hope that insurers are nice car nuts but in the real world they do their very best to avoid settlements.
A single vehicle inspection is also very unlikely to convince Police outside GB.
Shooosh. ❤
Manufacturers that dabbled in fully zinc dipping shells (before they realised it was bad for planned obsolescence) always seemed to go heavy on the overpaintable seam sealer, all over the place. Guessing part of that may have been related to that sponginess issue you described (although I’m guessing the dip process leaves a slightly thinner coating with less corner build up).
It will probably be a very cool car but it can never be the Ultimate if it doesn´t have a SAAB engine.
SAAB used Triumph engines anyway, so I don't think it really matters
@@mattclarke6773 If they use a new Audi engine they can use the B2x4 T5 engines that was in NG900/OG9-3 that is a SAAB engine also even if it's a Triumph engine it was what the 900 came with which makes it a SAAB engine.
@@mattclarke6773 Also they created the B-engine TOGETHER with Triumph and later did the H-engine that was an evolution of the B-engine and was in the 900 by themselves in Södertälje Sweden.
@tetepeb yes, but they're 4 cylinder engines and I'm not sure if they reliably make large hp. A B235r engine can make big power but only with aftermarket/tuning company parts, then you get into reliability issues.
A VAG DAZA 5 cylinder engine is probably best or newer.
@@mattclarke6773 A B204 makes 500hp without breaking a sweat or opening the longblock and with the money these projects cost, having it rebuildt with forged parts and balance and so one is not a big cost for reliability. We Swedes now how to tune these engines, even the old T16 engines can make good hp reliably but not as well as the T5.
The Sabb project...Cold War Motors just started on an other splice project to bring one old rusty car back using the chassis and part of the body of one and the upper panels of another..no fancy scanning over there just a different way and level of end product !
Sunday afternoon
Ready for the best entertainment around
Maybe too early for Bourbon
Probably better get a beer cause it’s 95 here in Texas
Too early for a bourbon? You need to move out of Texas, you're not tough enough to survive there.
Hi Team ... brilliant channel .... can't believe you're not in the lillins of subscribers .... quick question if I may ... could you tell me a bit about your fly press ...it looks a monster ... what make/model is it please?
A Question about the XJC, probably a little early. The door glass would pull away from the frame at speed, how will you improve that?
we feel the same about the weather here in the Netherlands!!!!!😎
As always a great video, on the Audi donor for the Saab wouldn't a car of the Audi's age contain a fair bit of weld through structural adhesive in the underbody seams, are you not worried about losing this when you pyro it?
Interesting comment about NVH in custom chassis vehicles. How did that pan out in the Morris Minor?
Don't tell Jonny Smith, but your baby poo Raptor appears to be the same colour as his aggro 😆
On the re--engined SAAB to a 5 cyl turbo Audi engine , why not a FORD FOCUS 5 cyl turbo engine and chassis?
Coz ford's are shit??
@TheOriginalDaveJ it's actually a volvo
Because that is originally a Volvo engine, and if you put a Volvo engine in a Saab, your days are numbered!
@@BOLLOX64 it's also a transverse fwd while the saabs are set up like the fwd audis of old
Unless you plan on the obligatory riot-gun mount, like the Police 900’s in Vail CO back in the 80’s, the build will be woefully incomplete.
Just a suggestion.
My dad gave me his 9000 turbo in the mid 90’s… I loved that car
HAHAHA!!!! Richards touching cloth 🤣🤣🤣
Good to see you are thinking of fitting 3 spoke aero type wheels to the SAAB
It'd be a crime not to do tri-spokes on a Saab 900.
The proportions of the Scimitar and the Saab seem very similar, -(from this side of the camera)..
Cherry red leather interior for jags of Churchill’s age , especially if your going for the chesterfield gentleman’s club look
The end did remind me of those TV ad's that say but wait there is more!
I tell ppl this is the best FF car ever made and im not joking its so much fun to drive
Having owned and lightly tuned some 25 SAABS over 25+ years I tend to agree. The 9000 were excellent but towing g with them usually ended up with the rear end of a 9000 pulling off! That happened 3 times. :(.
I learned to drive in an antique gold allegro with the weird suspension that rose up when you got to the clutch biting point on hill starts, those Honda vtec engines and cool looks will be awesome but that Saab is my dream car a beautiful car with a brilliant sound and real power, I can’t wait to see it come to life
SAAB FTW
Like to go have a pint with Mark sometime
Bet that would be a hoot
He might not understand my Texas drawl
I will come over and a have a beer 😜
Go to the tool icon in the top right bar and turn down the playback speed to 0.5x … takes Nate’s explanations to a whole new and fun level ! You’re welcome 😂
For the SAAB build, why didn't you use a 9-3 X SAAB? if you wanted a 4x4
Probably because the 9-3X is set up for a transverse engine whereas the Audi and 900 are both longitudinal mounted engines. And I imagine its just easier to get your hands on Audi body shells than for the 9-3
Saab Meets Porsche 935, I like it.
There is a Chev powered SAAB 9-3 Sports Sedan here in Australie which is a pretty wild beast and looks great.
Audi's are a good car, but if that Saab was mine, I think I'd be sitting it on an M series chassis. . .
@SavingSalvage will probably be interested in that V8.
As for the Saab parts, advertise them, plenty folk out there give you good money for them.
Cal seemed a little different this week, hope you're doing okay bud?
As ever.... I'm just flawed by the level of attention to detail, and skill level shown.
The Retropower workmanship is everything I could ever hope to aspire to. 🙌🏻
the rendering of the Saab is very nice. Now I would have kept the V8 out of the S4 over going to the Audi 5 cylinder however I do see your point why!
The battery looks like it about to do a bank job and then get chased by The Sweeney as it makes it's getaway ;-)
On the suspension parts do you still get the advantage of galvanic protection when all the zinc metal spray coating is then covered with powder coat?
Yes, you still get the galvanic protection, and the coating forms a “composite” as the powder coat soaks into the spongy zinc layer. It’s extremely tough stuff, and the rust protection is just unbelievable. A bit overkill possibly but better that way
I have a mini van in harvest gold, terrible colour but some how a great colour
i just want to say that you have a aswome shop and some awsome cars! im building my saab 96 2stroke (1963) into a classic gp car. but first it needs to drive :)
Why is land cruiser still in shop ?
oops was watching just as mentiond about leak lol
'Week 173: Bobby is still working on the E-Type door mechanisms...'
Mmm, Harvest Gold, let the flashbacks commence.
On the Jensen you have “notched” the chassis extensions/outriggers/jacking point arms for exhaust/manifold clearance. With the entire car supported by those jacking points (when the car is on the car lift) isn’t that potentially introducing a possible weakness/flex? Why didn’t Jensen do that if it isn’t a structural part? Exhaust/manifold clearance has always been an issue on the Interceptor, in that area.
A4 shell have you looked under the underfloor cladding yet???
Beautiful