1 doubt reg finding y and z. For this problem: F(x) =x1^2 + x2^2 +x3^2 g1(x) = x1+x2+3x3 - 2 g2(x) = 5x1 +2x2 +x3 - 5 They have taken Y=(x1, x2) and Z=(x3). How??
More use full of video but one doubt Y -dependent and Z - independent but enga mam atha mathi sollirukanga actually atha eppdi eduthukurathu nu konjam sollidunga pls
The vector Y & Z are called dependent and independent variables respectively. At time 3:52 i explained why we take x2 as independent variable and x1,x3 are dependent variable.
![Transportation Problem Using MODI or UV Method [Part-1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3vDSjCuYFp4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Transportation Problem Using MODI or UV Method [Part-1]](/img/tr.png)
![Jacobian Method[Part-2]](/img/1.gif)
Lagrangean method with two constraints problem upload pannuga mam
Very helpful 👍
Thank you🙏. Keep watching and support our channel by share our channel videos with your friends
Mam jacobian method minimization problem upload pannuga mam
1 doubt reg finding y and z.
For this problem:
F(x) =x1^2 + x2^2 +x3^2
g1(x) = x1+x2+3x3 - 2
g2(x) = 5x1 +2x2 +x3 - 5
They have taken Y=(x1, x2) and Z=(x3). How??
Pls reply the sum
Nambala assume panradhu pa adhu...idha dhn edukanum nu illa....
Super 👌thanks for the video!
Thank you.Keep Watching & Support our channel.
More use full of video but one doubt
Y -dependent and Z - independent but enga mam atha mathi sollirukanga actually atha eppdi eduthukurathu nu konjam sollidunga pls
Are you cleared your doubt?
@@WELCOMEENGINEERS no am not clear
The vector Y & Z are called dependent and independent variables respectively. At time 3:52 i explained why we take x2 as independent variable and x1,x3 are dependent variable.
@@WELCOMEENGINEERS ok but our class teacher say Y is independent and Z is dependent so that was confusion
Suppose dependent variable varaleyna enna panrathu
Feasible point kudukama ketta epdi pannurathu
Lagrangean methods podunga ....jacobian..
Bro tomorrow i will upload jacobian method part -2 then i upload lagrangean .keep Watching
Ma'am plzz open hindi channel also not able to understand
Please explain J inverse
Bro See the Jacobian Method Part-2 for the J inverse Explanation.
Chae chiiiii......na than 50th like poten
Thank you . Keep watching
Those who are studying this topic they already know differentiation, so I think there is no need for explaining the differentiation
I explained it for the people who don't know it.
@@WELCOMEENGINEERS ok
Sorry 😐