One thing that's become obvious is that there are no final frontiers. Like you said, there are only new horizons. 😊 Also, let's keep in mind that accuracy needs to be looked at in context. For example, a scientific calculator is perfect for calculations but that doesn't make it a mathematician. Similarly, an AI model for tumor classification might be great for detecting cancer vs. non-cancer, but that doesn't make it a doctor (or a surgeon.) 😊 The idea is that AI tools can make us better at our jobs, etc.
I do see potential to eventually phase out the need for practicing radiologists with this kind of technology. A radiologist's role could in the future be to oversee or further develop software with AI computer aided detection, but in the services of a radiologist could become non-essential at an imaging center. It takes a lot to replace a human at that level, but it is certainly possible if not likely!
It's a blast seeing Keith in something new
One thing that's become obvious is that there are no final frontiers. Like you said, there are only new horizons. 😊
Also, let's keep in mind that accuracy needs to be looked at in context. For example, a scientific calculator is perfect for calculations but that doesn't make it a mathematician. Similarly, an AI model for tumor classification might be great for detecting cancer vs. non-cancer, but that doesn't make it a doctor (or a surgeon.) 😊 The idea is that AI tools can make us better at our jobs, etc.
I do see potential to eventually phase out the need for practicing radiologists with this kind of technology. A radiologist's role could in the future be to oversee or further develop software with AI computer aided detection, but in the services of a radiologist could become non-essential at an imaging center. It takes a lot to replace a human at that level, but it is certainly possible if not likely!
He is being paid to promote others to jump on the AI/ML bandwagon.
ThinkTank255 they always are...