India के सबसे बड़े Diplomat से समझिए China का Thought Process: Padhaku Nitin, Ep 13
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 июл 2024
- चीन आबादी में दुनिया का दूसरा सबसे बड़ा और इलाके में तीसरा सबसे बड़ा देश है लेकिन उसका सपना इकोनॉमी में सबसे बड़ा देश बनना है. दर्जनों विद्वान कहते हैं बन भी जाएगा लेकिन हमारी टेंशन है कि पड़ोस में बसा ये देश हमें बराबरी का दर्जा नहीं देता. और ऐसा होने की वजहें ढेर हैं. कई तो हिस्ट्री में छुपी हैं. 'पढ़ाकू नितिन' इसे ही उघाड़ने आए हैं भारत के 32वें विदेश सचिव और चीन में राजदूत रहे विजय गोखले.
Disclaimer: इस पॉडकास्ट में व्यक्त किए गए विचार एक्सपर्ट के निजी हैं.
Precap: (0:00)
Intro: (3:43)
India's Stand: (12:22)
China's view: (23:38)
Stereotypes: (31:20)
Nehru: (47:28)
New India: (55:56)
Taiwan: (1:01:04)
UN Security Council Seat: (1:08:48)
T
Click Here For Latest Podcasts► aajtak.intoday.in/podcast.html
#Podcast #HindiPodcast #AajtakRadio
Like Us On Facebook ► https: / aajtakradio
Follow Us on Twitter ►https: / aajtakradio
Instagram ► / aajtakradio
Telegram ► t.me/aajtakradio
चीन की मूल भावना भारत के प्रति क्या है और वो क्यों है,इस पर प्रकाश डालने के लिये धन्यवाद
India was never offered the UN seat. P5 countries were all the allied countries who won the Second World War. They were ussr, USA, Britain, France (against Germany) and China, USA (against Japanese imperial forces. Canada was selected entirely on pressure from USA. However, most the Asian countries need to thank the imperial Japan for their freedom. Japan freed Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia and was fighting at Burma frontier. If Japan was not there, then most of the Asian countries would not have got their freedom from Britain or France for a long time. India got freedom because of the weakening of the British empire because of the Japanese and German and NOT because of Gandhi or congress.
Absolutely 👍
भारत ने अपने को महत्व देने लगा है,खुलकर बोलने लगा है
India has never been non aligned. Firstly, we got directions from Britain and then we signed a treaty of friendship, including military alliance with Soviet Union.
इंडियन फॉरेन पॉलिसी आज भी वही है जो पहले से चली आ रही है फर्क सिर्फ समय का है।
A very knowledgeable discussion. Thanks
Thank you 🙏
I think Indian should start saying or mentioning Tibet India border instead of china Tibet border
Excellent sir🙏🙏
तभी भारत INDIA था और सरेंडर कारनेमे सुरक्षा अनुभव करता था।
Very information podcast thanks you sir
China never was a friend of India. India’s greatest PAPPU Nehru did the blunder
India was always American puppet( Ghulam) country after independence...
The more I learn about Nehru, the more I feel depressed for celebrating this son of soil all my childhood. An incompetent PM and an incompetent PMO can sink a nation and it's future generations like a titanic. Time for India to rise and reclaim its lost borders. Akanda Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 Jai Hind
Don't fall in BJP propaganda politics. Question today government about invasion of China in Kashmir region. Why Modi is afraid from china
It was NOT surprising that those who knew Nehru did NOT for him to be PM (0), but Gandhi made him PM instead of the much favoured Sardar Patel!The more I read about Nehru and Gandhi, the more I criticize them!
first protect the borders we have. we most certainly will loose arunachal if war happen between india and china today.
The best podcast in recent days ❤
Great podcast 👏
Did veto really helpful for india in current geopolitical situation...?????
Neharu was a formar Pappu .
Tabhi tumhara parivaar yaha rh paaya aaram se 😂😂😂
@@eohitYadav Yadi aap Neharu ko kabil manate hai to Subash chandra Bose ko kyaa kahoge. Ye hamara ghor durbhagya thaa ki Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel, Dr. Rajendra Prashad, Bheem Rao Ambedakar etc jaise logo ke hote huve Jawarlal Neharu jaise Aiyash, Lampat, Murkh, aur Britishers ki chaplusi karane wala dalal Leader desh ka pahal PM banaa. PM banate hi ghotala aur Kashmir me Pakistan aur Arunachal me China se haar ka kalank Bharat pe lagaa. Eshi Neharu ne Subash Chandra Bose ko Bharat ka yuddh aparadhi ghosit karaya aur unhe gumnaam Maut marane pe majbur kiyaa. Neharu Maha Pappu tha kyoki usake pass Leader aur Sasan karane ki average yogyata nahi thi. Sirf Mahatma Gandhi aur Britishers ka Najayaj Support thaa Esh liye vo aage badh gayaa. Aap thik se history padhiye. Yadi 2nd world war me Germany aur Japan England ko buri tarah kamjor na kiya hota aur Subas Chandra Bose INA banakar war na kiye hote British se to Angrej kabhi bhi Bharat ko nahi chhode hote.
Ye baat sahi hai ki Bharat China ki narajgi se aj bhi darta hai,kuchh mayne me ye baat sahi hai, Indian Army ne Doklam me Chinese Army ko bahut buri tarah mara ye baat China ko aj bhi hajam nahi ho pati.is samay agar AEK majbut sarkar kam se kam 5 ya 10 saal India me rahegi to China dhire dhire raste par aa to jayega,lekin China kabhi bhi dhokha de sakta hai,China se Bharat ko hamesha Savdhan rahna padega.Jai Hind.
China’s thought process about india is very consistent. wo perform kar chuka hai aur we are inspiring to become a power not less than china.we are not doing what we sd do.instead going back to medieval era under rss.we sd go little more back to 600 ad.that was not sanatani but buddhism.this is the problem of china.rss will not be agree for buddhist india.and china will make all efforts that india wd not become any power.as a result india will remain a puppet of sick america and esrael who is struggling to survive.all the problem is the sanatan dharm of 700ad to1000ad.let us see what is in future.
India needs to re-open legitimacy issue of CCP rule of mainland China
Tibbat Bharath ka Abhinn Ang hai
Nagaland arunanchal pradesh Manipur zhogwo(Middle Kingdom)ka part he
Arunachal Pradesh China ka part hai
The Chinese had left no doubt about their thoughts in their writings, from Sun yet Sen to Chiang Kai Shek about their designs on our territories. The present govt. of Taiwan have not distanced themself from the same.
Yehi ki hum Dunka bazane me vishwas rakhte hai..,....
Nehru may be first pm but he behaved like last pm. He should be callled last governer general rather.
Modijika foreign policy sabse best he.
इन्डिया युरो, पस्चिमका दाश = बिजय प्रसाद (बिस्लेश्क )
China never consider India as a threat but India consider China a threat.
Sau baat ki ek baat Nehru ek bahut bada Gaddar Angrejon ka no 1 Pitthu tha, Yeh Sochne wali baat hai Un ke Rishte Edvina se Kyon the., kyon Sardar Patel Ji ko PM kyon nahin ban ne diya gaya., Asal baat yeh hai ki Britain Amreeka kabhi nahin chahte the aur Aj bhi yahi chahte hain ki Asia mein Puri tarah Shantih na ho aur Apas mein Ladte rahen hamesha Asia Kamjor hi rahe., Nehru ko PM bana kar UK Amreeka ne kewal Apna Ullu Seedha kiya., Aur 1947 se lekar 2014 tak UK aur Amreeka Bharat ko Chala raha tha Hum 2014 mein Ajhad hue hain., Aj ek Achhi Sarkar ke karan Bharath ke Sambandh puri Duniya se behtar ho rahe hain
Non aligned means was seperate from Two power block USA VS USSR.
what other countries have achieved by falling USA , See yourself .
At least ......
Book ka name kya h
Crosswinds
Kya ye book hindi ma h
डोकलाम विवाद में भारत ने चीन के सामने कौन सा कसम खाया है
भारतिय प्रशासकको स्कुलिङ पश्चिम् के हैन तो कैसे एसियन समाजमे मिलसकताहै! पतानही!?
एनालिसिस का शुक्रिया
बीते हुए कल पर बात नही होती ऐसा होता वैसा होता यह करते वोह करते ऐसा क्यों नहीं था वैसा क्यू नही था यह बाते अंधकार की तरफ ले जाती घर देश अपनी नीति मौजूदा हालात और आगे की सोच रख कर बनाता है
ये जितने भी लोग ज्ञान पेलते है अभी घर की नीति खुद के दिमाग से बना पाते बीवी अलग सोचती बच्चे अलग सोचते और रिश्तेदार अलग सोचते
47:25 😅😂
I have a question 🤔. Pl answer:
Suppose china 🇨🇳 takes Taiwan 🇹🇼 and cuts all trade, chips etc. World 🌎 won't be able to trade with S.Korea, Taiwan. In that situation, india will suffer immediate trade & employment problems.
But, will this situation also benefit india in next 10 years. Bcz then world will be forced to manufacture in india 🇮🇳. All companies from S.Korea & Taiwan will come to India bcz things needs to continue via alternative routes?
Foreign companies will never come to India....
China consider india as big Nepal Or as india consider Pakistan .
China also had it's own century of shame when when Mongolians warriors defeated China and ruled China for long. In recent time British and lapan made mince meat of China, both very small countries.
As for india, it had it's period of shame when muslims and British attacked us/and ruled us. Reason was buddhist philosophy of non violence and we are unfortunately still following the same policies.
Tune core bat bol di..iss desh ko bodhism ne namard bna dia..ye jain bodhism dharm ne beda garak kr dia..non violence policy ne yha k logo ko khtam kr dia
Nice podcast shows the depth of expertise and experience of a diplomat and the shallowness of knowledge of the host - he still thinks population is a criterion for a permanent seat. The host has good voice modulation but also talks too much.
I think China political changed in 1948
Why India and Pakistan Should Be Divided into Smaller Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of Holy Roman empire and subsequent kingdoms in Europe.
After the fall of the Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). British empire changed ownership rights in 1947
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that.
We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion.
The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions.
So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..
While broadly accepting the facts you have brought out, I emphatically disagree with your conclusion, which does not automatically emerge as an argument. As long as the people of India agree to remain together,who can separate them?
@physicsonline8853 Exactly. As long as people of different nations of India wana stay together in the union, none can force them to establish separate sovereign nation states.
Similarly, you can't force the nations to be sla*ves of Indian union (which is empire) if they want to establish their own independent nation states. Punjab Kashmir nagaland Manipur Assam Tamilnadu etc don't want to be part of this union. They have right to self determination and there must be a referendum under UN supervision in order to get their consent.
@@SatpalVerma000
What referendum?? India is together; those -Indians and make-believe Indians-who differ are agents of the " Break India"forces which wants to break the country and weaken it to satisfy nations jealous of India's rise- and will be dealt with as such.
हिंदी में बुक?
Nehru ko kosne ka ek aur video. Britain aur America ka naam k saath India nahi Nehru ? Wah re beimaan.
57:10 first save ur land from china then think about Taiwan
Uncle ji India me abhi bhi gareebi he hai....
Bodh dharm ka Daman Bharat mein kaise hua?Bodh logon ka narsanghar kisne karwaye.
Jay Modi seth Adaani Ambani Seth
भारतिय प्रशाशक अमेरिकी बेलायती व रुस को फोन कर्नेका अबभी हैसियत रख्ताहै क्या! भारत अन्तरास्ट्रिय स्थरमे बिस्श्यास कर्ने योग्य अबिभी हुवाहै क्या! शाहेदै पतानही!?
आपकी एनालिसिस USA पर भी हो
This much high level positioned person is not having fluency in.explaining the facts. Hence he is not able to explaining sencetive things properly.
Godi media bhi you tube broadcast karne lagi😅
Nehru misguided. INDIA.
This is good if Chinese copy paste technology people doesn't the real power of india
Becoz if enemy doesn't know the real power then it will definitely a plus point for india
But we know very much about copy paste & theft technology country
U Indians copy every thing from west and china no original 😂😂😂
Vijay Gokhale Jaise naukarshah aur pchli Sarkar ye
Donon iske liye jimmedaar hai.
Kashmir aur Tibet ka problem Nehru ki Den hai.
Aur lahu luhan vibhajan Congress ki den hai. Ab baten banane se kya fayda ??
Modi Sarkar lekin nahin pith rahi, naahi pichli bato ka vilap kar rahi hai . Vah kam kar rahi hai. Congress aur Gokhale ki galtiyon ko...
नेहरू / ईदीराजी ने मुस्लिम फेवर.. India मे world मे किया इशलिये मुस्लिम के पसंदगी वाला रसिया चुना. और प्रोपोगेंडा से US/UK को हमेशा गलत बताया
मोदी सरकार के कार्यकाल मे भारत का चाईना के साथ व्यापारिक घाटा 100 बिलियन डालर को पार कर गया है,क्यो,मोदी सरकार ईस पर मौन क्यो है
Never listen xi being aggressive, but Several time modi does. China always ask Nepal to make good relation with India but India does just opposite
90 PERCENT INDIAN NAME WALEY REPLIES ACTUALLY BY CHEENI RESEACHERS HAIN. THEIR SO CALLED INDIAN NAMES SHOULD'NT FOOL ANYONE.
Nehru was leftist
Yes, but Nehru was learning away from Hindus!
स्टालिन के दबाव में नेहरू को UN का सीट छोड़ा था
Stalin ka dabab ma nahi time ki dimand ka hisab sa tumha pata ha mou na Jo kranti ki the waha to mau ka pass Sena kitni the communist one crores or us kraniti ka liya us na kitna Chinese mara tha 2 crores or after independent huma kashmiri ma Pura one year Pakistan ka sath war karni Pari or pasa humara pass tha nahi tab china ko naraz Karna hum offord he nahi kar sakta tha uper sa communist hona ki bazah sa Russia Jo super power tha us ki china ko full spot the
Stalin was good for his nation . Nehru was an idiot for his own nation.
@@Singh.125⁰P
Source??
Ye what's up se pd kr aaye hai😂😂😂😂
Very bad debate no good opinion no knowledge
Dude you are missing KHALISTAN from Attock to jamuna river. The best future democratic nation.
galat bharat kavi tha hi nahi belaet ne india banaya tha
A bhara ta 1962 balabharat Rajnath arun modi amit nabin
Manohar bala bharat tereko
Ham padosibhabatshe
Pakistn cpese chhode de
Why u don't speak about now days Chinese occupation on Indian Territory. Nehru is no more. Speak about Modi politics!!
What Chinese occupation of Indian territories in Modi's time?U Seem to be a Congee, to ask people to stop talking about Nehru!
@@user-ig4mv1mm7wJay Modi seth Adaani Seth
Which Indian territory Chinese has occupied in modi's era....
My dear Anchor and Panelist Sirs, this all is useless. We, if have to match China, the Government of the day must not divide the Society, make the Defence forces genuinely strong and improve the economy. Agniveers will be no good in defending the borders. All such policies will prove useless. Jiske ghar mein nahin daane woh bahar walon se bhi jute khata hai.
it paid interview on Modi rag........1st get out China from Ladhak & Galwan ........then talk about Nehru ...........
CHEENI KUTIYA HAI, HAI.
तु बेकार लोग हो यार हम तुम काला लोग के क्यु बढे भाई माने। तुमरा रङ्ग देखकर बु आति हे।
भारतको एकदिन जरुर chin🤣तुक्डा तुक्डा कर्देगा l 😅
likhakar rakhalo india 25 tukado me batega
Kyu aur kaise?
bilkul sir aap jese logo ko desh ne chaina bhej rakha tha to koi bhi samjh sakta h ki phir chaina desh ke bare me kya sochta hoga? is Desh me teztraar logo ki kami nhi h. tum hi krke aaye ho chaina ki prgti
Nuclear test bajpeyee se 24 sal pahale Mrs Indira Gandhi ne kiya tha 1974 me
Aourat milgayi hogi china se,Nehru ishi tarah ke thhe.
jab AAA unnnn uuuu maaaaeee meee krna tha to tum chale kyu aate ho bolne?
His wording not true
Why India and Pakistan Should Be Divided into Smaller Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of Holy Roman empire and subsequent kingdoms in Europe.
After the fall of the Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). British empire changed ownership rights in 1947
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that.
We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion.
The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions.
So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..
KATUAUDDIN SINGH PAINDABAD. CHIN PONG LI SHADBAD. SAALEY CHINI RESEACHER : JHUTA VERMA ZINDABAD. YEH INDU SARZAMIN HAI CHEENI AANKHEN. TURKISTAN AZAAD, KASHGHAR AZAAD. TIBET AZAD, LHASA AZAAAD. HARBIN AZAAD, MANCHURIA AZAAD.
@@DJ-vg8by English please