The fact that Starmer knew what was going on BUT continued to imprison people for 'misinformation' is enough to call for their immediate release and jail him on the same charges.
Also Nick Lowles who drugged and SA'd a man, also friend of BBC & Labour also runs Hate Not Hope, said “those fanning the flames” are “just as guilty” as the rioters and should be investigated. But the day before, he made up that acid had been thrown at a Muslim woman in Middlesbgh.
@@jkjxx68 Pro establishment media * I understand what you are saying but the media in the uk is absolutely controlled by the elite establishment it’s not political, just obedient.
Without giving any credence to any conspiracy theory, I will say that this affair has revealed the nature of Starmer. Authoritarian, deaf to the concerns of the public and determined to defend the indefensible: the abject failure of Islamic "multiculturalism". I think it fairly obvious that the threat to social cohesion is going to increase.
The left cant form societies. What they do is they invite countries from all over the world and some integrate whilst others have almost closed off communities. This is fine in small cases but once 20-30% is reached they will be demanding their cultures and norms be installed. I worked with 100s of mooslims for years and far too many would joke about slittin thr0ats, blowing up, throwin 0ff building . I found it quite jarring and this weird normalisation of violent deth.
I have tried to engage my "new" Labour MP on this very subject several times by email, what I recieve in response is what appears cut & paste text, without any personal response to my questions. My first email he took 3 months to answer. He (David Smith) appears to share the same deafness to what I made to him as reasonable and polite concerns. My last email to him was in December, Which I reminded him this week he still had not replied. This feeling of having nobody to discuss my concerns with or access to Westminster through my local MP is deeply concerning.
There are certain tangibles that no amount of authoritarian micromanagement can disguise. The people of Britain, I would contend, and in fact most Western societies, have experienced during the last 20 odd years, a degeneration of living standards as a direct consequence of the lack of social cohesion you refer to, as well as a decrease in safety on the streets, and a strong feeling, supported by personal experience, that our ability to express our personal apprehensions is being curtailed by the oppressive logic of a supposedly liberal progressive class who seem to feel that serving the activist minority view is more important than representing the perspective of the average citizen. It astounds me how deaf to common feeling they are, and how simultaneously short sighted the approach is. Perhaps most important of all, my sense is, that there is no trust in the institutions, and the media, to represent factually, the world as it is. Data and statistics are manipulated to suit the policy or motives of the day. People can tolerate extraordinary hardship, but being gaslighted at every turn is an insult too far.
@ibana8449 if you make them squirm, they call it far right and have a pass to not even acknowledge your concerns. Probably the same squirm when alex Rudd was being passed around prevent programs and people talking about Gr00 gangs. This is where we are in these sensitive times.
Starmer broadcast to the world that everyone arrested were "criminals", "far right" and that they needed to be "come down hard" upon, very prejudiced! Absolutely hypocritically libellous! Starmer prejudiced the court cases of people like PETER LYNCH
Far-right to Starmer is anyone who doesn't vote Labour, and/or doesn't support their agenda. Or in layman's terms, anyone who isn't either openly far left or dogwhistling their true far left selves whilst pretending to be centrist (like Starmer himself).
It goes further than that. This guy had a sustained interest in Jean Oh Side, which has a very specific meaning. They are refusing to see the obvious here.
We are far too tolerant and frankly naive in this country around other cultures. We are NOT all the same. We have to be much much less tolerant of these backward cultures.
Exactly right - the time to make the speech he made today was July 30th. The time to offer heartfelt condolences to the families was July 30th ( if not the day it happened) the people he should have comforted were the families NOT the police. Or the Muslims… in fact the Muslims should have been comforting their neighbours .., were they so doing? Or just protecting the mosque?
Asked - the clip I saw was a police officer asking if they would PLEASE(!!) leave their weapons in the mosque. Could not believe what I was hearing. Surreal. @@Towdbod98Ds
There should not be any mosques in our Country if that makes me racist then so be it. We are a Chritian Country and if they need their own church in our Country why come here in the first place..if we demanded our church in their Countries there would be hell to pay so why arent we the same! They even brought sharia law courts with them and demand their children are schooled differently to match their ways!! If they won't integrate as its OUR COUNTRY, GO HOME or be deported!
Hang on. It was released that he was a Christian choirboy born in Cardiff! That indicates to me it was a cover up; the speed the information was put out together with a photograph of the suspect as a young boy ??
the picture I saw of him today, paints such a radically different story, than the sweet one from his school pictures as a young boy. He honestly looks like a demonic fiend from a high end horror movie. Which, incidentally, isn't that far from the truth.
We weren't able to see a current photo or talk about Rudakubana because that could apparently influence a future jury and jeopardise his trial. Yet it was OK to see the innocent schoolboy pic and be told that he was a Welsh choirboy from an upright Christian family. Wouldn't that also have influenced a jury, only in a more positive direction?
Starmer did his level best to protect this killer and his family. Hasn’t even written a letter to the families of the little girl victims. He couldn’t care less about the concerns of the British people. His loyalties lie elsewhere
Starmer does not stack up and must go. We cannot trust him, he is arrogant, has no vision and seems to have some dark secrets from his past that link to today. He needs to go and his statement is just nonsense. He is a robot. Still he thinks we are all FAR RIGHT!
@@susansimpson6049 The Human rights of British girls and patriots have been ignored over the criminals rights which are forfeit (in my humble opinion) when they are guilty and if appropriate they and their families need to leave our Islands
Well said, he didn't say a word about the boats and the endless young males from who knows where entering our country illegally on a daily basis! ..but is gonna protect our children! The whole thing is sickening!!..😢😢
The Labour Party and Starmer might not have covered up anything, but his reaction to the unrest that followed the Southport attack was despicable, calling everyone far right, when normal people are right to be concerned, however reports in the media that he was a Welsh choirboy and the innocent photo of him as a child was definitely taking us for fools, and trying to cover up something.
The idea of showing us photos of him as a little kid, close to the age of the children he murdered, was to reframe it as a child on child attack. We would not hold him as responsible as we would a teenager nearly an adult.
It's odd, isn't it: we weren't able to see any photos of 17/18yr old Rudakubana or discuss his case for fear of jeopardising the case, prejudicing the jury and giving his lawyers a loophole to claim that he couldn't have a fair trial. So why was publishing his childhood photo, along with the narrative that he was a Welsh choirboy from an upright Christian family also not seen as being capable of prejudicing his future jury ? Obviously moving the prejudice in a more favourable direction.
Starmer suppressed the evidence that he was a muslim, had ricin and had accessed terrorist-related material. It was deliberately withheld for several months through fear of offending a certain demographic.
@TiwsDay if your dog gives birth in the stables, the puppies are dogs, not horses. If a couple from Rwanda , as refugees, have a child in Cardiff, that is the child's place of birth. His ethnicity is Rwandan , not Welsh.
This is the Welshman of the future. Move over, Llywelyn the Great, Owain Glyn Dŵr, Henry Tudor, Lloyd George, Nye Bevin… Radukabana (or however you spell him) is the face of the brave, new, anti-racist Wales.
Emberly misses the question. It is not a question of: "Should Starmer give a running commentary." The question is if his government interfered in any way with the decisions to withhold infomation.
Hands were somewhat tied until the first court appearance, as the suspect was under 18 years old at the time. The riots had kicked off by then. I was getting information at the time from BBC News and can't understand why they weren't including the standard phrase about the suspect "who cannot be named for legal reasons", which would have cost nothing. As far as I remember, they first included the phrase on the morning of the first court appearance, at which most restrictions were lifted so its appearance was made obsolete within hours.
Very strange that this guy had an Al-Qaeda terror manual & Ricin at his home-yet his attack was deemed non-terrorist. Yet the Nazi vermin who stabbed a non-white was last week jailed for 22 years-that attack was prosecuted as terrorist by the CPS & the judge said it was clearly a terrorist attack-so what is the difference? The explanation/defence for Southport not being desiganated as such is that he didn't have his manual at the scene, well as far as I know the Nazi didn't have his manifesto at the scene of his attack either.
WE see now how this HMG see us. Milch cows to fund their useless lifestyles, whislt they treat us with contempt, punish us and attach evil labels to us. 2-tier is beyond belief.How I envy the US, who have a leade who loves his people. Not one maklng excuses for criminal, anti-British behaviour in order to keep his power base.
Disagree with some of the assertions made People were not expecting a running commentary from the PM What we expected was: -Not to be labelled far right for being concerned citizens/ parents -not to be kept in the dark; he admits he knew; then make a statement via the Home Secretary when it became apparent the terror materials / prevent was know or whether the guy was a convert -not for the police to rule out terror - as pointed out There is evidence that Starmer was involved with his father, the degree of which should be clarified Starmer has show his authoritarian nature & his far left tendencies in either mollycoddling the public, or more likely having such a low opinion of the public to not trust us to be able to deal with unpleasant news The public would be better able to deal with news without the obvious 2tier policing exhibited by the state over the last decades ie the rape&torture gangs
Of course there’s a cover up of some sort! Parliament had the right to question removed!! And no one asked for a running commentary either. The man forgets he’s a paid servant of the people tasked with governing the people’s money. He’s not supposed to be a Dictator in a Democracy.
He gave a running commentary on those arrested for protesting. The Home Office could have released information about the ricin, Jihadi Manual, his past behaviour, the Jury would have been told of these things anyway. These are the Starmer Riots. 9/11 an inside job with 19 patsies. We are told about bad behaviour, threats at school and hockey sticks. These have a resonance. But ignored then.
There is one very important question no one is asking, this animal and his family were being investigated as dangerous in their home country, which was dealt with by Keir Starmer stepping in and sponsoring their immigration into the UK for their safety in the event of their being guilty there. Paul Embury is clearly protecting Starmer here or is ignorant of the true facts.
@@fionahamilton5994 If that were the case why has Starmer been so adamant in his efforts to shut the whole episode down. The information was available to see before the election, while the family were still living in Cardiff as a complete family, but then the information as with so much of Starmers past is slowly being eradicated from general availability.
According to elsewhere Axel takes part in islamic prayers in prison. Also TR was moved from the same prison as Axel so that TR couldn't get the information out to the public. There is definitely a cover up in place.
It's funny you should say that. Having been compelled to drive repeatedly into Stoke on Trent recently in order to visit my mother in hospital, it struck me that the UK increasingly resembles the DDR in many respects. (I write as one who visited the DDR and who researched it extensively for a film script in 20222/23.).
@@FraserBailey-jm5yz lets hope it will all change for the better, I think people are stirring in sufficient numbers due to X etc to stop this communist dictatorship really taking hold- I feel more optimistic than I did with yesterdays happening in America.However I think it will be a painful road on many fronts economy, immigration etc.
Why couldn’t we comment or speculate about Axel R’s motives because it might “prejudice the trail” but Starmer can comment on the motives of the protesters/ rioters?
I think the real issue is that the public heard of the attack, and made an assumption. We were told our assumption was wrong and dangerous to suggest. Turns out we were right, and THEY KNEW what he was. We all knew WHY he did it. We just aren't allowed to say or type it. Pathetic. Stuck Farmer.
"We are not treating the events as terror related" as the police statement? One of the first questions that needs to be asked in Parliament is: "Did any member of the government communicate with the police regarding the classification as terror related or not.
The other cited cases that were referred to as terror related all occured under a Tory government. This one occured under a Labour government. Labour are so committed to supporting muslims that they will not allow anything to get in front of their ideological stance. Not even the cold blooded slaughter of children. I notice that immediately after his brief visit to Southport to lay a wreath, he went right to the local mosque to reassure the attendees that they would be protected. He did not visit the hospitals where the surviving victims were being treated. Shows his priorities.
Whilst previous governments have been almost totally incompetent at every level, the one thing that the current governing elites have always been good at is; distraction, obfuscation and deflation. Frankly, this terror attack had the power to set of the multi-ethnic tinder box that is today's Great Britain, and it almost happened. Everybody knows that multi-culturalism has failed, demographics are shifting at an accelerated rate, and that currently there are 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation ethnics who are living in this country that harbour an UTTER contempt for the native English; our children, our women, and our way of life. The government, media, police, court systems etc. did absolutely EVERYTHING they could to take the wind out of the sails of this event. The government were utterly silent, refusing to even discuss the matter (other than the standard token gestures of sorrow to the families). The media portrayed the murdering little sod out to be a 'Welsh, Christian boy', and presented a photo of the killer taken perhaps 5-6 years earlier than his current age, a la Trayvon Martin. The police and courts hushed everything and everyone up, no doubt warning families of the victims to not speak in public, lest they themselves be arrested for inciting racial hatred. I've never been more disgusted to see how heavy handed the police and courts dealt with the protesters, especially considering the two-tier nature of how different minority communities were treated in comparison to whites. The most hilarious thing about today's announcements was the speech given by Yvette Cooper, who seemed more concerned about how the killer being able to buy a knife on Amazon....... EXCUSE ME? How about asking the question WHY HE AND HIS WHOLE DAMNED FAMILY WERE EVEN ALLOWED IN THIS COUNTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE? WHAT has happened to this country? Do these people have ANY right to rule us? I'm starting to sympathise with what the Bolsheviks did to their ruling elite once they ousted them from power.
Having now seen Axel’s mugshot I suspect it was withheld because it risked sparking unrest that would have made the riots which occurred look like a silver service dinner party. Especially when paired with the establishment line that he was as Welsh as Gareth Jones. They probably thought (with good reason) that savage’s face and the insistence he was Welsh would have been just too much.
That mug shot is not a natural photo. He is tucking his chin in , folding his lips and looking up(whites of eyes are very clear at the bottom of the eyelid). In my estimation this is not a mug shot. Especially if you put it next to when they put up the school photo. I have my own ideas on why this photo has been released!
Not strong enough, Paul. Not by half. Starmer's slippery & disingenuous comments about the Southport attack were not even close to being 'reasonable'. Right from the start, the man had access to details about the killer via Prevent, not only the police investigation underway, that would clearly have indicated a potential Islamist motive to this horror. Yet Starmer went straight on television to waffle some irrelevant garbage about knife crime & began slating anyone who dared put 1+1 together. That was the catalyst which started winding up tensions as it became immediately clear that something was very wrong & he was refusing to acknowledge it (so, yet another cover up was likely being instigated). And things only got worse as he pushed the far-right narrative, had people rushed through the courts for naughty social media posts & even got the nudge unit to create another 'spontaneous' anti-racist demo (to counter racist marches that were never going to happen - because those were a fiction, too). Consequently, when you say Sir Drear Smarmer is being reasonable, I have to ask what planet you're on? As far as I can tell, as always, he's quite the opposite.
The guy always seems edgy. Notice he gulps a lot. Dry throat and anxious. He was a fireman for years. Great pension no worries. The tax payer served well.
This is a posed photo, he has pulled his chin down, folded his lips and looked upwards (the whites of his eyes are not naturally aligned ). Especially if you compare with the school boy picture(very small eyes with little white showing ). I have my own thoughts on why this photo has been released...
My main concern is how to survive all of these financial and political crisis, especially in light of the US political power scuffle. The government has really called things more difficult for its citizens, and we can't sit back and bear all the consequences of the bad governance.
I started with as low as $12,000 actually because it was my first time and it ended up being profitable, She is a great personality in the States and she's so intelligent.
What Paul Embery didn't make reference to was those people who were sent to prison for hurty words. Starmer was well aware of what he was doing by putting pressure on the judiciary to impose severe sentences on those people. These people were saying this attack was islamist related and were smacked by the Starmer government for saying so, but we now know the inclinations of these political prisoners were fundamentally correct.
" ....failure of State institutions... " . what ????? again ? and again ? and again ?and again ? how many times are we going to lose innocent children before these State institutions are purged. Who has the BALLS to sort this nation out.
Certainly, to focus on the man as a former “choirboy” was grossly disingenuous. “Choirboy” conjures up images of angelic little lads - occasionally mischievous, of course - but the connotation is one of goodness and purity, not one of barbaric slaughter.
This guy is deluded , it’s not British native’s responsibility to integrate people. There are plenty of groups that integrate well. You can’t integrate those who don’t want too. It’s the same fantasy that’s been peddled by the cool kids for the last 30 years.
Stalmer called the Protestors "Right wing thugs and criminals" BEFORE they had been to court!!!! So is that not "prejudicial" ? And how many "lone wolves" does it take to make a pack????
The comment about Starmer not wanting to give a running commentary- Starmer led the debate with inflammatory comments about ordinary people as being far right. He didn’t mind running off at the mouth with insulting words rather than paternal calming statements
I think it's even worse than that. I think this traitorous government conspired to create this event, by recruiting this character, radicalising him, and keeping him out of jail despite his repeated offences, so that he could be free to perpetrate this awful crime.
No, a PM is not expected to indulge in a running commentary. But was Government pressure placed on the Manchester Police? Of course the FOI request was refused; not to protect the integrity of any inquiry but to hide any Government pressure
Why was the court date moved along with some other controversial cases? Why were questions removed from within Parliament ? Why has Starmer not redacted his Far Right comments? But Paul says there’s no conspiracy, so all good , job done ….now let’s move you along nothing too see here …. Authoritarianism inch by inch
Spot on....they will want this to just go away......but we won't let them. Starmer's claims to make every stone "unturned" in the public enquiry -we'L see about that. No doubt it will be an attempted sham. The public aren't stupid we can see through it, he will have to be doing mental gymnastics to get out of this scandal of the century !
Starmer himself does not stack up. Pre Election Starmer was totally different, to Post Election. In the latter, his actions were totally different, to what he indicated Pre Election. To me, that amounts to lying. I can find no compelling reason to believe any words that comes out of his mouth. I don,t think I am alone in that. Unfortunately the cabinet that surrounds him, seem to be of a similar bent.
Paul Embery seems very reasonable and measured in his thoughts. I'm a little surprised by his choice of reading material on the bookshelves that would suggest he would communicate a lot more of the far left rhetoric. I guess he's just an old style; Labour man, the like of which we don't see very often these days!
I agree with your assessment of Mr.Embury, he’s like a throwback from what Labour was all about before they decided to ditch the British working class?
Embury is either an apologist for the regime or very naive. The Spectator just loves to parade the acceptable face of the soft left in order to cover for the ugliness of the actual left.
My experience. You get to your 50s, take a look around you and think: "Why are all these people here?"... Indeed "why is even a single one of them here?"
Surprised to hear Paul saying that . Hate when he is on GB dont feel he tries to be objective and always defends mass immigration nothing to say about the impact on the country
Paul Embery has a very bland approach. He says thinks like 'I don't think.......' Well we think there has been some serious cover ups that demand more serious investigation. Hung up on this interview.
I'll tell you why 'something doesn't stack up'. Because we're being manipulated away from the real questions. A guilty plea is very clever. None nobody will ever need to know who planned all this, who recruited him, who radicalised him, who kept him out of prison until it was his time to be activated, and who it was who finally deployed him to cause more deliberate conflict and chaos. Is there anyone we know who would do such a thing, has the power and influence to make it possible for him to evade arrest despite his crimes, and clearly wants to see this country on its knees?
@@arfurascii2232 A guilty plea means that the prosecution team does not need to interrogate him in court, and that the Court Documents will not have to record answers to many questions that otherwise would have been necessary in order to prove his guilt. It's a way of avoiding him exposing anything via that in-court questioning. That's my point. And what's makes you think that the authorities would spend any further time investigating if he's already destroyed his own defence and confessed?
@@zantas-handle "And what's makes you think that the authorities would spend any further time investigating if he's already destroyed his own defence and confessed?" - because generally they want to do their jobs properly. Also they want be seen to be doing their jobs properly - especially when their failures or misses are the subject of public attention. And it's not difficult to recall specific cases in which they have continued to investigate although the perpetrator is behind bars. This is routine.
This system has failed CHILDREN and we need a new type of democracy. Lets go Swiss - referendums it works. They (Swiss) have forced government legislation changes, by using referendums. So WASPI and Winter Fuel Payment would be a national referendum. This PM has been duplicitous since the 2016 Brexit vote. He shows his contempt for democracy, I quote Stammer - DAVOS OR WESTMINSTER- DAVOS. For over a decade we have been double-crossed by one P.M. after another. In Switzerland voters can reverse government legislation by referendum and they have, and do, do it. Its time no more political parties lets go SWISS
Was he "a lone wolf"? He may have carried out the act on his own, but was he talking/emailing/etc with anyone or group? There are so many unanswered questions - answers we will never now get. Starmer continues to act as a lawyer & not as a politician, let alone the country's PM!
The fact that Starmer knew what was going on BUT continued to imprison people for 'misinformation' is enough to call for their immediate release and jail him on the same charges.
Bang on
sadly he'll get away with it. pro labour media will downplay this as much as they can
Also Nick Lowles who drugged and SA'd a man, also friend of BBC & Labour also runs Hate Not Hope, said “those fanning the flames” are “just as guilty” as the rioters and should be investigated. But the day before, he made up that acid had been thrown at a Muslim woman in Middlesbgh.
@@jkjxx68 Pro establishment media * I understand what you are saying but the media in the uk is absolutely controlled by the elite establishment it’s not political, just obedient.
👍👍👍
Without giving any credence to any conspiracy theory, I will say that this affair has revealed the nature of Starmer. Authoritarian, deaf to the concerns of the public and determined to defend the indefensible: the abject failure of Islamic "multiculturalism". I think it fairly obvious that the threat to social cohesion is going to increase.
Spot on this comment 🏴
The left cant form societies. What they do is they invite countries from all over the world and some integrate whilst others have almost closed off communities. This is fine in small cases but once 20-30% is reached they will be demanding their cultures and norms be installed.
I worked with 100s of mooslims for years and far too many would joke about slittin thr0ats, blowing up, throwin 0ff building .
I found it quite jarring and this weird normalisation of violent deth.
I have tried to engage my "new" Labour MP on this very subject several times by email, what I recieve in response is what appears cut & paste text, without any personal response to my questions. My first email he took 3 months to answer. He (David Smith) appears to share the same deafness to what I made to him as reasonable and polite concerns. My last email to him was in December, Which I reminded him this week he still had not replied. This feeling of having nobody to discuss my concerns with or access to Westminster through my local MP is deeply concerning.
There are certain tangibles that no amount of authoritarian micromanagement can disguise. The people of Britain, I would contend, and in fact most Western societies, have experienced during the last 20 odd years, a degeneration of living standards as a direct consequence of the lack of social cohesion you refer to, as well as a decrease in safety on the streets, and a strong feeling, supported by personal experience, that our ability to express our personal apprehensions is being curtailed by the oppressive logic of a supposedly liberal progressive class who seem to feel that serving the activist minority view is more important than representing the perspective of the average citizen.
It astounds me how deaf to common feeling they are, and how simultaneously short sighted the approach is. Perhaps most important of all, my sense is, that there is no trust in the institutions, and the media, to represent factually, the world as it is. Data and statistics are manipulated to suit the policy or motives of the day. People can tolerate extraordinary hardship, but being gaslighted at every turn is an insult too far.
@ibana8449 if you make them squirm, they call it far right and have a pass to not even acknowledge your concerns.
Probably the same squirm when alex Rudd was being passed around prevent programs and people talking about Gr00 gangs.
This is where we are in these sensitive times.
Starmer broadcast to the world that everyone arrested were "criminals", "far right" and that they needed to be "come down hard" upon, very prejudiced! Absolutely hypocritically libellous! Starmer prejudiced the court cases of people like PETER LYNCH
RIP Peter Lynch
Exactly
Well said
Far-right to Starmer is anyone who doesn't vote Labour, and/or doesn't support their agenda.
Or in layman's terms, anyone who isn't either openly far left or dogwhistling their true far left selves whilst pretending to be centrist (like Starmer himself).
Yeah, complete double standards.
protecting their voting cabal.
100%agree
Mass stabbing? Don’t you mean mass murder?
quite. BBC reported is repeatedly as just 3 girls stabbed.
It goes further than that. This guy had a sustained interest in Jean Oh Side, which has a very specific meaning. They are refusing to see the obvious here.
What about saying he would protect the Muslims after this happened but no protection for little girls?
And the police told the Alans to leave their weapons at the mosk.
We are far too tolerant and frankly naive in this country around other cultures. We are NOT all the same. We have to be much much less tolerant of these backward cultures.
Exactly right - the time to make the speech he made today was July 30th. The time to offer heartfelt condolences to the families was July 30th ( if not the day it happened) the people he should have comforted were the families NOT the police. Or the Muslims… in fact the Muslims should have been comforting their neighbours .., were they so doing? Or just protecting the mosque?
Asked - the clip I saw was a police officer asking if they would PLEASE(!!) leave their weapons in the mosque.
Could not believe what I was hearing. Surreal.
@@Towdbod98Ds
There should not be any mosques in our Country if that makes me racist then so be it. We are a Chritian Country and if they need their own church in our Country why come here in the first place..if we demanded our church in their Countries there would be hell to pay so why arent we the same! They even brought sharia law courts with them and demand their children are schooled differently to match their ways!! If they won't integrate as its OUR COUNTRY, GO HOME or be deported!
Waaay to diplomatic, Paul.
Just as with R Gangs - the response was systemic, ideological and deliberate, by the Far-Left establishment
To diplomatic and beyond!
Agree fully
trade unionist leaders tend to be diplomatic when their team is at the wheel
Talk about sitting on the fence , Paul should be wincing with pain ?.
@alistairnewton8898 Paul was more comfortable criticising the Tories, sadly.
It stinks. The whole thing.
"New threat" , it's not new at all, it's been building for years.
Lee Rigby 😢 🇬🇧
Whats been building?
And ignored for longer! Can't upset the immigrants!
New Threat is Liebour!
It’s been going on for years under people noses , but treated as etc drink driving , accident , gang related .
Hang on. It was released that he was a Christian choirboy born in Cardiff! That indicates to me it was a cover up; the speed the information was put out together with a photograph of the suspect as a young boy ??
the picture I saw of him today, paints such a radically different story, than the sweet one from his school pictures as a young boy. He honestly looks like a demonic fiend from a high end horror movie. Which, incidentally, isn't that far from the truth.
We weren't able to see a current photo or talk about Rudakubana because that could apparently influence a future jury and jeopardise his trial. Yet it was OK to see the innocent schoolboy pic and be told that he was a Welsh choirboy from an upright Christian family. Wouldn't that also have influenced a jury, only in a more positive direction?
@@pennylando3145 .......a typical two-faced-Stoma response, SO DESPERATE he is to protect his muslim-gift-giving DONORS.
Exactly, this bloke is just full of Waffle.
Starmer did his level best to protect this killer and his family. Hasn’t even written a letter to the families of the little girl victims. He couldn’t care less about the concerns of the British people. His loyalties lie elsewhere
The govt politicised the Judiciary and Police Cheifs at Southport, then today implores us to believe they are Independant bodies.
Starmer is a Liar.
... and a tyrant.
...and a traitor
For starmer - Justice is not blind, its Intersectional.
He has the rationality of a GCSE political club captain.
🎯
My 11 year old son is more intelligent than starma
The self satisfied kid that takes over.
No. He's not blind - just hungry for votes from certain communities.
@@kenricnarbrough8191 GCSE? I think you are being generous there.
Starmer gave a running commentary on the stitching up of the British protestors.
Starmer does not stack up and must go. We cannot trust him, he is arrogant, has no vision and seems to have some dark secrets from his past that link to today. He needs to go and his statement is just nonsense. He is a robot. Still he thinks we are all FAR RIGHT!
Starmer is a WEF puppet.
Yes we need to know exactly whose human rights he was protecting in the past as a lawyer!
Genocidal deputy district Governor Anaclet Rudakubana@@susansimpson6049
It is well documented he defended terrorists and child murderers and stopped them from being deported.
@@susansimpson6049 The Human rights of British girls and patriots have been ignored over the criminals rights which are forfeit (in my humble opinion) when they are guilty and if appropriate they and their families need to leave our Islands
We need a public inquiry into Keir Starmer.
@@FraserBailey-jm5yz it’s called a general election
AMEN
We do, and the traitor should be thrown in prison
It's already mostly been examined by, 'the lotus eaters'.
It's only terrorist if done by the far right everyone knows that just ask Starmer
How can Starmer protect our children when he refuses to do anything about immigration?
Well said, he didn't say a word about the boats and the endless young males from who knows where entering our country illegally on a daily basis! ..but is gonna protect our children! The whole thing is sickening!!..😢😢
He spends money on protecting the mosques instead.
Yes he is vomit inducing
Because, quite simply, he doesn't care. He has the eyes of a sociopath.
He can't. He doesn't care.
The Labour Party and Starmer might not have covered up anything, but his reaction to the unrest that followed the Southport attack was despicable, calling everyone far right, when normal people are right to be concerned, however reports in the media that he was a Welsh choirboy and the innocent photo of him as a child was definitely taking us for fools, and trying to cover up something.
Anything to do with possible islamists/illegal immigrants has to be covered up! 😢😢😢
The idea of showing us photos of him as a little kid, close to the age of the children he murdered, was to reframe it as a child on child attack. We would not hold him as responsible as we would a teenager nearly an adult.
It's odd, isn't it: we weren't able to see any photos of 17/18yr old Rudakubana or discuss his case for fear of jeopardising the case, prejudicing the jury and giving his lawyers a loophole to claim that he couldn't have a fair trial. So why was publishing his childhood photo, along with the narrative that he was a Welsh choirboy from an upright Christian family also not seen as being capable of prejudicing his future jury ? Obviously moving the prejudice in a more favourable direction.
Stoma's CHIEF GIFT-GIVER is muslim
Starmer suppressed the evidence that he was a muslim, had ricin and had accessed terrorist-related material. It was deliberately withheld for several months through fear of offending a certain demographic.
But why did the government claim ‘Welshman’ and not terrorist related. Clearly designed to mislead. Not just ‘not give a running commentary’. Come on…
@TiwsDay if your dog gives birth in the stables, the puppies are dogs, not horses. If a couple from Rwanda , as refugees, have a child in Cardiff, that is the child's place of birth. His ethnicity is Rwandan , not Welsh.
They are still doing it, the front page of The Sun today “The Amazon “ killer. No , it should have said”The Jhihadi “ killer
@@laurapearson3370 yes Laura, we are not falling for it!
This is the Welshman of the future. Move over, Llywelyn the Great, Owain Glyn Dŵr, Henry Tudor, Lloyd George, Nye Bevin… Radukabana (or however you spell him) is the face of the brave, new, anti-racist Wales.
Waffling on, making excuses for starmer
Emberly misses the question.
It is not a question of:
"Should Starmer give a running commentary."
The question is if his government interfered in any way with the decisions to withhold infomation.
Exactly, he's just full of waffle.
Hands were somewhat tied until the first court appearance, as the suspect was under 18 years old at the time. The riots had kicked off by then. I was getting information at the time from BBC News and can't understand why they weren't including the standard phrase about the suspect "who cannot be named for legal reasons", which would have cost nothing. As far as I remember, they first included the phrase on the morning of the first court appearance, at which most restrictions were lifted so its appearance was made obsolete within hours.
Very strange that this guy had an Al-Qaeda terror manual & Ricin at his home-yet his attack was deemed non-terrorist. Yet the Nazi vermin who stabbed a non-white was last week jailed for 22 years-that attack was prosecuted as terrorist by the CPS & the judge said it was clearly a terrorist attack-so what is the difference? The explanation/defence for Southport not being desiganated as such is that he didn't have his manual at the scene, well as far as I know the Nazi didn't have his manifesto at the scene of his attack either.
There quick enough to label anybody "Far-Right thugs" just for being present at a protest though.
they say "provable motive".
@@brianlopez8855 Both are provable
WE see now how this HMG see us. Milch cows to fund their useless lifestyles, whislt they treat us with contempt, punish us and attach evil labels to us. 2-tier is beyond belief.How I envy the US, who have a leade who loves his people. Not one maklng excuses for criminal, anti-British behaviour in order to keep his power base.
Disagree with some of the assertions made
People were not expecting a running commentary from the PM
What we expected was:
-Not to be labelled far right for being concerned citizens/ parents
-not to be kept in the dark; he admits he knew; then make a statement via the Home Secretary when it became apparent the terror materials / prevent was know or whether the guy was a convert
-not for the police to rule out terror - as pointed out
There is evidence that Starmer was involved with his father, the degree of which should be clarified
Starmer has show his authoritarian nature & his far left tendencies in either mollycoddling the public, or more likely having such a low opinion of the public to not trust us to be able to deal with unpleasant news
The public would be better able to deal with news without the obvious 2tier policing exhibited by the state over the last decades ie the rape&torture gangs
Cover up from day one is the most accurate description.
Blaming everyone as far right was not a misstep. It was a cynical ploy.
Of course there’s a cover up of some sort! Parliament had the right to question removed!!
And no one asked for a running commentary either.
The man forgets he’s a paid servant of the people tasked with governing the people’s money. He’s not supposed to be a Dictator in a Democracy.
He is just a muslim stool pigeon.
He gave a running commentary on those arrested for protesting. The Home Office could have released information about the ricin, Jihadi Manual, his past behaviour, the Jury would have been told of these things anyway. These are the Starmer Riots. 9/11 an inside job with 19 patsies. We are told about bad behaviour, threats at school and hockey sticks. These have a resonance. But ignored then.
There is one very important question no one is asking, this animal and his family were being investigated as dangerous in their home country, which was dealt with by Keir Starmer stepping in and sponsoring their immigration into the UK for their safety in the event of their being guilty there. Paul Embury is clearly protecting Starmer here or is ignorant of the true facts.
@@geoffhoward2171 do you know these assertions to be true and factual,I understood they fled the Hutu masassacre as they are Tutsi.
@@fionahamilton5994 If that were the case why has Starmer been so adamant in his efforts to shut the whole episode down. The information was available to see before the election, while the family were still living in Cardiff as a complete family, but then the information as with so much of Starmers past is slowly being eradicated from general availability.
Starmer needs to quit and his knighthood removed. He lied to the public and started making threats with 24/7 courts just to cover is rear. 🙄🙄🙄🙄
According to elsewhere Axel takes part in islamic prayers in prison. Also TR was moved from the same prison as Axel so that TR couldn't get the information out to the public. There is definitely a cover up in place.
Starmer has read the room wrong every day since he was voted in. It's time for him to move on.
It seems to me Starmer can not relate to the British people and is so arrogant he knows whats best for us
starmer looks and behaves like Erich Honecker, little wonder the police upper echelons have a Stasi mindset!
It's funny you should say that. Having been compelled to drive repeatedly into Stoke on Trent recently in order to visit my mother in hospital, it struck me that the UK increasingly resembles the DDR in many respects. (I write as one who visited the DDR and who researched it extensively for a film script in 20222/23.).
@@FraserBailey-jm5yz lets hope it will all change for the better, I think people are stirring in sufficient numbers due to X etc to stop this communist dictatorship really taking hold- I feel more optimistic than I did with yesterdays happening in America.However I think it will be a painful road on many fronts economy, immigration etc.
That comparison made me giggle but it’s a fair comparison
he is like a character from 1984,
Why couldn’t we comment or speculate about Axel R’s motives because it might “prejudice the trail” but Starmer can comment on the motives of the protesters/ rioters?
And yet the far right guy just found guilty of attacking the migrant was given 20 years. The judge described him as a terrorist. 🤷🏼♀️
I think the real issue is that the public heard of the attack, and made an assumption. We were told our assumption was wrong and dangerous to suggest. Turns out we were right, and THEY KNEW what he was. We all knew WHY he did it. We just aren't allowed to say or type it. Pathetic. Stuck Farmer.
The Manchester arena bombing 8 years ago was a lone wolf. And he says its new ?????
"We are not treating the events as terror related" as the police statement?
One of the first questions that needs to be asked in Parliament is:
"Did any member of the government communicate with the police regarding the classification as terror related or not.
Can’t trust starmer.
Double speak from KS to shut down social media under the guise of terrorism
The other cited cases that were referred to as terror related all occured under a Tory government. This one occured under a Labour government. Labour are so committed to supporting muslims that they will not allow anything to get in front of their ideological stance. Not even the cold blooded slaughter of children. I notice that immediately after his brief visit to Southport to lay a wreath, he went right to the local mosque to reassure the attendees that they would be protected. He did not visit the hospitals where the surviving victims were being treated. Shows his priorities.
Whilst previous governments have been almost totally incompetent at every level, the one thing that the current governing elites have always been good at is; distraction, obfuscation and deflation.
Frankly, this terror attack had the power to set of the multi-ethnic tinder box that is today's Great Britain, and it almost happened. Everybody knows that multi-culturalism has failed, demographics are shifting at an accelerated rate, and that currently there are 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation ethnics who are living in this country that harbour an UTTER contempt for the native English; our children, our women, and our way of life.
The government, media, police, court systems etc. did absolutely EVERYTHING they could to take the wind out of the sails of this event. The government were utterly silent, refusing to even discuss the matter (other than the standard token gestures of sorrow to the families). The media portrayed the murdering little sod out to be a 'Welsh, Christian boy', and presented a photo of the killer taken perhaps 5-6 years earlier than his current age, a la Trayvon Martin. The police and courts hushed everything and everyone up, no doubt warning families of the victims to not speak in public, lest they themselves be arrested for inciting racial hatred. I've never been more disgusted to see how heavy handed the police and courts dealt with the protesters, especially considering the two-tier nature of how different minority communities were treated in comparison to whites.
The most hilarious thing about today's announcements was the speech given by Yvette Cooper, who seemed more concerned about how the killer being able to buy a knife on Amazon....... EXCUSE ME? How about asking the question WHY HE AND HIS WHOLE DAMNED FAMILY WERE EVEN ALLOWED IN THIS COUNTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE?
WHAT has happened to this country? Do these people have ANY right to rule us? I'm starting to sympathise with what the Bolsheviks did to their ruling elite once they ousted them from power.
👏👏👏 ^ THIS.
Well said.
RIP Peter Lynch
I have been watching with horror and disbelief from Australia 😢
Having now seen Axel’s mugshot I suspect it was withheld because it risked sparking unrest that would have made the riots which occurred look like a silver service dinner party. Especially when paired with the establishment line that he was as Welsh as Gareth Jones. They probably thought (with good reason) that savage’s face and the insistence he was Welsh would have been just too much.
It still could be. Just delayed, and even exacerbated by the deception.
They are just delaying the inevitable. Their ideology and policies have failed the country and they aren't planning on reversing them.
That mug shot is not a natural photo. He is tucking his chin in , folding his lips and looking up(whites of eyes are very clear at the bottom of the eyelid). In my estimation this is not a mug shot. Especially if you put it next to when they put up the school photo. I have my own ideas on why this photo has been released!
Not strong enough, Paul. Not by half. Starmer's slippery & disingenuous comments about the Southport attack were not even close to being 'reasonable'. Right from the start, the man had access to details about the killer via Prevent, not only the police investigation underway, that would clearly have indicated a potential Islamist motive to this horror. Yet Starmer went straight on television to waffle some irrelevant garbage about knife crime & began slating anyone who dared put 1+1 together. That was the catalyst which started winding up tensions as it became immediately clear that something was very wrong & he was refusing to acknowledge it (so, yet another cover up was likely being instigated). And things only got worse as he pushed the far-right narrative, had people rushed through the courts for naughty social media posts & even got the nudge unit to create another 'spontaneous' anti-racist demo (to counter racist marches that were never going to happen - because those were a fiction, too). Consequently, when you say Sir Drear Smarmer is being reasonable, I have to ask what planet you're on? As far as I can tell, as always, he's quite the opposite.
Mass stabbing? It was child murder.
What most people don't know is the dreadful extent of the injuries.
Starmer is a traitor.
A protester lost his life thanks to Starmer. They didn't mind jeopardising those trials.
Paul seems naive at best.
Very, very naive - and, as you suggest, that's the most polite interpretation.
The guy always seems edgy. Notice he gulps a lot. Dry throat and anxious.
He was a fireman for years. Great pension no worries. The tax payer served well.
he is a Labour operative after all
Quite a difference between the original photo of Axel put out to the public, compared to the more recent photo of him, eh?
Exactly what me and the women in M&S were saying
Have you tried the own brand matured cheddar?🧈
Any surprise ?
@vonrecht1236 Unfortunately, no.
This is a posed photo, he has pulled his chin down, folded his lips and looked upwards (the whites of his eyes are not naturally aligned ). Especially if you compare with the school boy picture(very small eyes with little white showing ). I have my own thoughts on why this photo has been released...
Starmer is an absolute snake. Perhaps Lord Ali is his advisor as well as provider?
Bear in mind that leading up to Southport there were other incidents (soldier stabbed etc) and this was the final straw!!
This is NOT going away Starmer until you are held accountable for those atrocities.
My main concern is how to survive all of these financial and political crisis, especially in light of the US political power scuffle. The government has really called things more difficult for its citizens, and we can't sit back and bear all the consequences of the bad governance.
I totally agree with you. I've made over 220k this year...
I started with as low as $12,000 actually because it was my first time and it ended up being profitable, She is a great personality in the States and she's so intelligent.
You trade also?, I tried trading after watching some videos on RUclips but still keep making losses, how do you trade on your own?
No I don't trade on my own , I always required help and assistance
From my personal financial advisor Evelyn Susanne Scarlett
What Paul Embery didn't make reference to was those people who were sent to prison for hurty words. Starmer was well aware of what he was doing by putting pressure on the judiciary to impose severe sentences on those people. These people were saying this attack was islamist related and were smacked by the Starmer government for saying so, but we now know the inclinations of these political prisoners were fundamentally correct.
" ....failure of State institutions... " . what ????? again ? and again ? and again ?and again ? how many times are we going to lose innocent children before these State institutions are purged. Who has the BALLS to sort this nation out.
Certainly, to focus on the man as a former “choirboy” was grossly disingenuous. “Choirboy” conjures up images of angelic little lads - occasionally mischievous, of course - but the connotation is one of goodness and purity, not one of barbaric slaughter.
Why was this case so SPECIAL? Others were called terrorist attacks why is this the exception?
This guy is deluded , it’s not British native’s responsibility to integrate people. There are plenty of groups that integrate well. You can’t integrate those who don’t want too. It’s the same fantasy that’s been peddled by the cool kids for the last 30 years.
Don't think Embery understood the question let alone give a coherent answer
I fear for my children and my grandchildren what is happening to this country. If you don't know their identity, you hold them till you do simple.
What does he mean he doesn’t think there was a cover up? Starlin has admitted to it ! Duh!
We were lied to
Stalmer called the Protestors "Right wing thugs and criminals" BEFORE they had been to court!!!! So is that not "prejudicial" ? And how many "lone wolves" does it take to make a pack????
Starmer did provide a running commentary and suggested those who linked it with terrorism were wrong.
Which human rights lawyer enabled that families asylum case, because those girls would still be alive
When are starmer and rayner ging to kneel for the grooming gang victims? Or the Southport victims?
no confidence in the legal system which is too political which is so obvious with a two teir approach!
The comment about Starmer not wanting to give a running commentary- Starmer led the debate with inflammatory comments about ordinary people as being far right. He didn’t mind running off at the mouth with insulting words rather than paternal calming statements
this is the new way to silence people pull the far right card
Starmer & Cooper misled the public, repeatedly and for Paul to lay this just at the police's door is a cop out.
I genuinely do think this is a deliberate cover up.
I think it's even worse than that. I think this traitorous government conspired to create this event, by recruiting this character, radicalising him, and keeping him out of jail despite his repeated offences, so that he could be free to perpetrate this awful crime.
Just complete incompetence then. Either way Starmer out
The Chief Constable of Merseyside has not covered herself in glory here.I have no confidence in her.Over promoted.
Everything about it stinks, especially the way they used the photograph of the murderer as a 12 year old when they had his mugshot after his arrest.
How can this not be classified as terrorism, and at the same time Tommy Robinson was treated as a terrorist. I'm missing something here.
I would plead to King Charles to disolve the UK government and have a national vote for common sense
Will they free all those quickly placed in jail for saying it was a Muslim terrorist, asking for a friend…
No, a PM is not expected to indulge in a running commentary.
But was Government pressure placed on the Manchester Police?
Of course the FOI request was refused; not to protect the integrity of any inquiry but to hide any Government pressure
They all have evil eyes to me. I know evil when I see it. The murderer's eyes look evil, and so do Starmer'S,
Why was the court date moved along with some other controversial cases? Why were questions removed from within Parliament ? Why has Starmer not redacted his Far Right comments? But Paul says there’s no conspiracy, so all good , job done ….now let’s move you along nothing too see here …. Authoritarianism inch by inch
Spot on....they will want this to just go away......but we won't let them. Starmer's claims to make every stone "unturned" in the public enquiry -we'L see about that. No doubt it will be an attempted sham. The public aren't stupid we can see through it, he will have to be doing mental gymnastics to get out of this scandal of the century !
Great example of talking an awful lot without actually saying anything.
I have a gut feeling stammers involvement with this monster goes deepr . I think he knows the family personslly .! Something is not right !
Starmer himself does not stack up. Pre Election Starmer was totally different, to Post Election.
In the latter, his actions were totally different, to what he indicated Pre Election. To me, that amounts to lying.
I can find no compelling reason to believe any words that comes out of his mouth. I don,t think I am alone in that. Unfortunately the cabinet that surrounds him, seem to be of a similar bent.
Paul Embery seems very reasonable and measured in his thoughts. I'm a little surprised by his choice of reading material on the bookshelves that would suggest he would communicate a lot more of the far left rhetoric. I guess he's just an old style; Labour man, the like of which we don't see very often these days!
I agree with your assessment of Mr.Embury, he’s like a throwback from what Labour was all about before they decided to ditch the British working class?
Embury is either an apologist for the regime or very naive. The Spectator just loves to parade the acceptable face of the soft left in order to cover for the ugliness of the actual left.
Labour was for Sovietising Britain as far back as 1917.
@@georgehetty7857 Indeed!
@@blackm004 You can tell a lot about people by their books - unless you think that they are just there for show!
My experience. You get to your 50s, take a look around you and think: "Why are all these people here?"... Indeed "why is even a single one of them here?"
Surprised to hear Paul saying that . Hate when he is on GB dont feel he tries to be objective and always defends mass immigration nothing to say about the impact on the country
Starmer seems to be the biggest monster of them all
The establishment, especially Labour only care for their client groups over the native population.
Paul Embery has a very bland approach. He says thinks like 'I don't think.......' Well we think there has been some serious cover ups that demand more serious investigation. Hung up on this interview.
I'll tell you why 'something doesn't stack up'. Because we're being manipulated away from the real questions. A guilty plea is very clever. None nobody will ever need to know who planned all this, who recruited him, who radicalised him, who kept him out of prison until it was his time to be activated, and who it was who finally deployed him to cause more deliberate conflict and chaos. Is there anyone we know who would do such a thing, has the power and influence to make it possible for him to evade arrest despite his crimes, and clearly wants to see this country on its knees?
Why do you think the authorities will stop investigating because he has pleaded guilty?
@@arfurascii2232 A guilty plea means that the prosecution team does not need to interrogate him in court, and that the Court Documents will not have to record answers to many questions that otherwise would have been necessary in order to prove his guilt. It's a way of avoiding him exposing anything via that in-court questioning. That's my point. And what's makes you think that the authorities would spend any further time investigating if he's already destroyed his own defence and confessed?
@@zantas-handle "And what's makes you think that the authorities would spend any further time investigating if he's already destroyed his own defence and confessed?" - because generally they want to do their jobs properly. Also they want be seen to be doing their jobs properly - especially when their failures or misses are the subject of public attention.
And it's not difficult to recall specific cases in which they have continued to investigate although the perpetrator is behind bars. This is routine.
Well said, these are all points I have been querying myself?
We all know this is either a cover up, or gross incompetence so bad it warrants instant dismissal
I think Starmer has links with the family
This system has failed CHILDREN and we need a new type of democracy. Lets go Swiss - referendums it works. They (Swiss) have forced government legislation changes, by using referendums. So WASPI and Winter Fuel Payment would be a national referendum. This PM has been duplicitous since the 2016 Brexit vote. He shows his contempt for democracy, I quote Stammer - DAVOS OR WESTMINSTER- DAVOS. For over a decade we have been double-crossed by one P.M. after another. In Switzerland voters can reverse government legislation by referendum and they have, and do, do it. Its time no more political parties lets go SWISS
Conspiracy suggests competence and that is one thing we know kier and his front bench lack.
These guys are part of the problem.
Why is it so hard to call out when something is obviously wrong and evil.
Ridiculous stances these 2 hold.
Paul Embery should stand for election. I don't share his politics but he talks with balance and fairness!!!
Balance and fairness? Haha... He's an apologist, no balance in that.
Was he "a lone wolf"?
He may have carried out the act on his own, but was he talking/emailing/etc with anyone or group?
There are so many unanswered questions - answers we will never now get.
Starmer continues to act as a lawyer & not as a politician, let alone the country's PM!
Paul, you say everything that was wrong very well but somehow clear Starmer from any responsibility.
He's on starmers side obviously.
Just tell us 'not to look back in anger', I dare you.
They said not terror related and suspect was a Christian both were lies .
If not for double standards, would have none at all.