I'm really happy that we live in a time where nobody needs proof of anything at all. Not to make allegations, and not to defend yourself against. You can just say whatever you want and people will believe it. Absolutely wonderful.
Doc admitted it though, he admitted to talking inappropriately with a minor. I gave Doc the benefit of the doubt and was hoping he would defend himself but that stopped when he ADMITTED to it, then edited out minor, them edited it back in once he was caught. And no, I will not believe that dumbass bs that he did that on purpose to trick people because that is the dumbest shit I've ever heard
Idk man I still don't like the doc, even if he didn't break any laws, dude is still a cheating scumbag, that's all I gotta say, and maybe he is innocent
5:02 Note that Dr. Disrespect said *the legal age of consent* and was not referring to their age comparative to 18. In some states, the age of consent goes as low as 16.
nobody seems to understand that he most likely is not allowed to release these chat logs because that's still bound by the rules of the lawsuit and the agreement, just like how nobody involved in the lawsuit is allowed to talk about or discuss it in the first place, so of course he hasn't shared them
@@Prismarine1 it is the reason. he been said before that he would have showed the chat messages but he is banned from twitch where said incident took place. cant show something that you dont have access to. as far as why TWITCH who HAS access to these things has not said anything well then yea probably is because of the lawsuit and whatnot. its a lot going on so idk.
I don't even think that the doc has access to those logs in the first place, Twitch has them. Once you get banned on twitch you can't log into your account.
@@perpetually. not to mention that if they are released, and they show everything he said, it would do so much damage to twitch. I still believe he didn't know at the time of the messages the user was underage, this happened all in conjunction with him cheating on his wife. While he should have vetted his DMS a bit better I think he neglected that and had an adult conversation with a minor. I'm saying "adult" like the way you would be talking to someone you know, where jokes are jokes and they don't get taken out of context because the other person is a minor. I doubt we will ever know, and at the end of the day his wife knows all about this, the leak isn't the first time she is hearing about this and she decided to forgive him, so who are we to talk about it anyway.
Dude within 24 hours Nick Avocato got skinny and Dr. Disrespect RESPONDED????? This is history being made right here (and apparently a rblx ytuber got exposed) (and Bella The Wolf got doxxed what?????)
why’s everyone diddying on minors rn guys it’s not that hard to not like kids ppl seem to think I like kids and that’s not what im saying so srry if I worded it wrong (im a kid)
People have been doing this forever morons are just thinking it’s a new thing because it’s happening to public figures in the media. This is pure evil and it’s always existed just look at Islam
These 4 Years have been a Rollercoaster of Emotions, Technoblade's Death, Dream Face Reveal, Mr Beast and Dr Disrespect's Allegations, Colby Getting Cancer, Sam Breaking up with Kat, COVID, Flus etc
@@Kurosawa-Official remember when we were kids and used to have anime battles with toy figurines? I used to smash small cars by sliding them real hard while aligned with the wall against my lil bro's... Fun, innocent times
I have a feeling this MIGHT be like a pyrocynical situation. where he ISN'T a pedo but the chatlogs have very embarrassing shit in them that he doesn't want to get out. so he's trying to prove the best he can he's NOT a pedo without releasing his embarrassing secrets. whether it be fetishes, hobbies or anything else.
He already said that the person he texted was a minor and then deleted that. He's trying to cover up his tracks guaranteed, it's not the same situation.
Homie has the worst PR team if he genuinely thinks going "haha i said stuff to make you infer I was a pedo just to say im not gottem" makes him look good
So here's what I got from his response, The reason why he didn't talk about the ban or the tweet was from legal actions (which is understandable). Cody cherry picked random texts from his chat logs to make it look like he was intentionally sexting a minor, and though he was talking bad towards her, he claims his intentions were to never be intimate with her. And he never attempted to meet up with this girl nor ever met her in the first place. I will be honest, I am kind of neutral on this as well and would like to see the chat logs if everything he says is true.
I don't think we can legally get the chat logs, also it's none of our fuckin businesses either so Doc does have a point there we shouldn't act like second graders forcing it out of him when he most likely legally can't do that, I mean the oath of silence was there for a reason, Cody doing this shit breaks it and putting those messages out there would push Doc over the edge even more in a legal stand point
@@GoId3nWrId I mean I understand, he had some legal barriers that prevented him from speaking about it, but I don't know why he admitted to it when he claimed it wasn't true. Unless he took some sort of plea deal, I think he's lying
bro is not convincing us 😭🙏 edit: please let me have my own opinion. just because I said "us" this did not mean I was telling you to think the same thing. this generation is not cooked just because I made a comment stating how dr disrespect's argument did not exactly convince me.
What's super crazy to me, a lot of people are focusing on her being 17 and saying "he isn't technically a pedophile because she is too old", "a 17 year old knows what they are doing", "there's nothing wrong with this she is old enough", most if not all of them would completely change their tune if they had a daughter. "It's fine and she knows what she is doing" turns into "Get away from my daughter you degenerate you are too old for her". Anyone who says that they would be fine with it if he was rich is a liar. Edit is my spelling.
There is nothing magical between a 17 year old and an 18 year old. It's a superficial difference. Science shows us today that people don't stop maturing mentally until past their 30s. The US has set the legal age to be 18 but other countries have it lower. Trying to gauge morality from something as superficial from a single year difference is funny in my opinion. What you're insinuating is that if someone has an 18 year old daughter, they would then automatically be fine if some random 30 year old started hitting on them. The answer is still going to be no, not because of legal issues, but because of personal moral reasons. Most people naturally wouldn't want to form a relationship where the two people are over a decade apart.
Meanwhile all these same people will turn right around and attack Kris Tyson, for inappropriate jokes in the proximity of minor, yet defend Dr Disrespect whom was directly contacting one with intent.
It's not just the number. First of all, 17 would be like...best case scenario for him (still wrong imo) and I would bet she wasn't even that. These ppl don't go after numbers cuz they like numbers...they go after naivity and innocence. It's one thing if a 55 yr old man gets with a 30 yr old woman...and a completely different thing if a (insert adult age) tries to get with a teenager. It's not the gap...it's the age of the younger individual that makes it predatory. Nothing funny about it, either. Anyone who uses the defense of..."age of consent where they live" arguement....is a piece of predatory shit.
@@dannydome In my opinion, there's no functional difference between a 17 and 18 year old. The law is perfectly fine for anyone to do anything with an 18 year old, but then people see it as a moral issue if they are 17. Yes, there is a problem when it comes to people seeking naivety and innocence, but that's still a subjective thing and you can have adults who are more innocent in terms of mental development. It's not black and white.
@@hewkiithetiscytofficialcha8903 fair, but usually one thing happens and everyone follows. One youtuber retired, multiple more after. One person exposed as a predator, multiple others right after. Nikocado redeemed himself (and I'm pretty sure EDP did too) and now Dr. Disrespect has too, so basically it probably means like 3 or 4 people will follow.
@@WafflesONTOOOOOP EDP without a doubt messaged a minor and has not even apologized for it he shouldnt be on internet if he wants to redeem his life he can do so in private but he shouldnt have the option to continue in a place where'd he have the ability to contact children. And as for the doc if he is innocent showing the messages should be no problem but he said he hasnt and probably wont instead hes trying to make this a "politics" thing. I dont know if he did it but god knows i believe him trying to avoiding showing proof will make him seem more guilty then anything.
The Doc said an I quote "Were there twitch whisper messages with an individual minor back in 2017? The answer is yes." as well as "These were casual mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of inappropriate" and "from a moral standpoint I absolutely take responsibility. I should have never entertained these conversations to begin with. That's on me. That's on me as an adult, a husband and a father. It should have never happened. I get it. I'm not perfect and I'll fucking own my shit. This was stupid."
His stream said otherwise sadly Doc is now pointing fingers and placing blame. He's not even owning up to anything wrong that he clearly did based on what his statement said smh.....Doc is 100% still a pdf file and guilty simple as that.
Investigations into it exonerated him of wrong doing -- no sexting occurred. When he said he "inappropriately DM'd a minor" he didn't mean sexually and again it was investigated and proved that no grooming or sexual things were said or done. The logs are off limits due to the lawsuit that Twitch LOST over this. No soliciting of a minor occurred. --- In his now deleted post about this he said he inappropriately DM'd a minor. People ran wild with this calling it an admission of guilt of sexually DMing or grooming a minor. the word "inappropriate" can mean nearly anything and does not automatically mean it was some deviant sexual nature.
@@OsmosisMaple Citation needed for the exact nature of the DMs because he never said it wasn't sexual in nature at all. Once again reread the quotes. Where did I state he was or was not soliciting anything? You are just as fast to jump to conclusions as the opposition you face. He admitted what he did was morally wrong, I'm going to take his stance on the matter too.
@@OsmosisMaple The logs are off limits because they're not allowed to release a minors communications under most circumstances, not because Twitch lost anything. It's to protect the identity of a minor.
I feel like this is Doc’s last attempt to try to make himself seem good, like talking to a minor is NOoOoOT the same as the group chats, and then he js starts tweakin out 😭🙏
i will say Dr disrespect is kinda winning, because, if they were to call him a Pedo, at least have some proves, there are at least 1 image of prove for every youtuber to be cancelled, they didn't interview the "Victim" nor him or don't even explains the whole thing as a whole. And i am not fan of him nor a hater, but you shouldn't NEVER and EVER accused someone with no prove to back it up.
We know that the accuser has to show proof and not the accused what normally would be the right way but here is a thing Dr said that "i made sure to mention minor" for baiting the public to accuse him being a PDF therefore he created a lie to make the public to accuse him and in this scenario Dr the accused therefore he dont has to show any proof But since it was a lie for rage bait Dr accused the public to calling him a PDF therefore the public became the accused what's mean that Dr has to show a proof If Dr wanna take this to court the the video gonna be the evidence about he Created a lie to make people's think he's a PDF Dr aint gonna get nothing from this on couty Its not a win and his "im playing 4D chess" failed miserably and even backfired He really tried to spark that two braincell
@@coolhaircutguy Koofy's situation at least have people that (kaka hide their identity so dik lol) provide them proves, and kaka also research himself and and look into his account, that's why it's obvious, but there were no prove for Dr Disrespect or, the predator you may
@@MobsterYTB Yeah, it surely is classified for the reasons I stated in my original comment but the Doc might have an original copy. The thing is, it's probably not the whole chat log but just the bits important for the investigation so even if he were to show them it probably wouldn't even prove much more than what he already said in his statement. The context people are eager for won't be served with that either so there isn't really anything he can even do at this point.
he likely can't show the messages because when you're banned you can no longer access them. it would be more troubling IF he had them saved prior to getting banned, that would somewhat admit he knew he was doing something wrong. Twitch is really the party that controls the whispers which is why they put as part of the settlement even if he got his hands on t hem he could not release them. so if people want to see the whispers they have to pressure twitch not doc. doc doesn't control the chat logs THEY DO, and if you haven't seen those logs in 4 years from twitch that means it looks bad ON TWITCH, meaning there's nothing there and it would be obvious that the partner manager was framing him to get him banned.
Honestly, everyone's obsessed with these " chat logs " but I'm just waiting for the end result. Someone's getting retribution, I don't care who. I want to see one side's head canon or fantasy story shatter to a million pieces.
he might be meaning that the minor (being under 18) is over the legal age of consent assuming they live in "those" specific states in the US, aka, they are a minor (under 18) but above age of consent (above 16)
@@claudius_drusus_ the girl was confirmed under 18 at the time. There's nothing left to discuss in the Docs own words "What I did was wrong, I was stupid."
@@claudius_drusus_ That's not why. If it was federal, it would be because it happened across state lines, I believe. Not necessarily because it was on the Internet.
16-17 is still illegal if you say stuff online, legally the age of consent online is 18. He removed the 'minor' part because he didn't wanna consider it that since they weren't where they lived. What he said wasn't illegal but he 100% said some creepy stuff to someone he shouldn't have.
Did you even watch the video lol. That was kinda the point. To bait out the liars at Twitch. An admission is NOT evidence, not even in a legal trial in court...and they all fell for it.
8:39 Doc should really just release the logs if he swears theres nothing wrong as he's trying to 'save his reputation'. Him calling the public '12, and immature' for wanting that, is self incriminating and suspicious of anything they couldve potentially been talking about that is weird on any level
I am confident he can't release the logs due to legal reasons........ but him calling people.childish and immature cause they won't take his word when he Admitted to being INAPPRIATE WITH A MINOR whatever the reason may be........like he can't expect people to take his word instantly
If the chat logs is being used as evidence in court, which, I fucking hope they would be used, then he isn't allowed to show them to the public until after the case.
Trying to respond to the allegations but the evidence is too much. He had everything, but got the drake virus and chose minors instead. Now he’s trying to act like it was nothing? I have nothing but disrespect for this man.
@@MixtriesV1 I think because this is a case of fame and well some women just want fame and Dr. Disrespect is somebody to flirt and cheat with people so it's not surprising
@@RejectedArtistFromAustria I don't think he said that, he did say I think, that the age where this person was from is the Legal Age of Consent cause some states in the US are 16, 17 etc. But I feel like there is still some legal lines crossed here, maybe not heavy ones like CSAM material, none of that happened it seems
More states in the US have the age of consent as 16 than 18. Over 30 states have 16 as the age of consent, and he said the person was 17 in the video, so he's got a 2/3s chance of being innocent of these charges solely on that. And if that's the case, all those news outlets and youtubers who jumped the gun on an accusation are guilty of libel and he's probably suing the hell out of several of them too. On the logs: Doc is banned from Twitch so he probably cannot even access his account to get the chat logs. That means Twitch would be the one withholding the chat logs, not Doc. And it sounds alot like the case is being re-arbitrated, and they're going to be paying out the ass for Cody's fuckup, so as long as that's happening, there's no way in hell they're going to be posting them. Not when they're essentially material evidence in the arbitration. The one sure thing here: Cody is turbo-fucked. Twitch will be suing them for breaching NDA, Doc will be suing them for libel. They're absolutely screwed.
Thank you bruh someone who actually understands, like really? Asking for chat logs that the Doc himself can’t even access because he’s terminated? Like come on bruh
Interstate age of consent is 18. We know she isn't in his state because the age of consent is 18 in Cali. The colloquial (common usage and not the literal dictionary definition) definition of pedophilia doesn't stop once someone exceeds the age of consent, it's applied to anyone prowling on children regardless of age of consent. Dr. Dumbshit won't be suing anyone since that would allow opposing lawyers to pursue his personal phone records in discovery. Also, he straight up admitted to it so the defense against libel is the truth that he told everyone.
4:54 It's not that confusing, at the time he probably thought she WAS a minor, probably because that's what everyone else was saying, but, from what he also says later, apparently in the region she lives in, she was actually NOT a minor. Which means she may have been British/European. It's important to note that she also said she didn't want to report anything but Twitch went against her wishes...why? What was the reason for that? I know but I'd like other people to work it out. Because it's a VENDETTA.
Fr people are so fucking rude and don't believe him even after he responded, there is literally pure evidence, I'm glad you agree that he's telling the truth, like he literally has a fucking wife, and curse left out Dr disrespect saying he was texting a fan.
yall both right and the memes and shit make it hardto focus and with the slightest bit of yapping which isn't much but the slightest bit just throws me off and i gotta refocus and it's hard for me to think of logical reasons and play detective
if the logs are something like a minor trauma dumping to him, then that would kind tie up all the little details we have; being sexual but not innappropriate and justifying why he can’t go into any detail, getting banned by strict adherence to rules but not facing any criminal charges, etc. to me it really seems like it’s that.
@@ralfred2009you overestimate people’s abilities to stay professional and not show favouritism or to not fuck people over purely based on the fact they don’t like them.
@@ralfred2009 Nope, twitch banned for way less like the jidion perma ban for "brigading" someone who is is friend. Furthermore the logs were looked at by authorities, so dr disrespect didn't sext anyone the question is did he get weird or was it something like @geatmasta says it could be.
In the community of world of tanks blitz, about a month ago the biggest youtuber, droodles, has been 'outed' for similar accusations and he took his channel down. After 2 weeks, he made it public again and explained his perspective, and he's back at 100k again. Some interesting similarities can be observed between these situations.
Confidential because of the court case.. he cant show screenshots plus we believed Cody with NO PROOF AT ALL?? So whats different from him saying this and cody saying stuff but he looks clearly upset about twitch backstabbing him.
@@Config555 this comment makes perfects sense. The most common age of consent, found in 31 states, is 16 yrs old., meaning STILL A MINOR and not 18. So Dr.'s arguement is that although they werent an adult (18yr+), they were at least the appropriate age for the jurisdiction(the state they live in), which seems like a stupid arguement cause theyre still a minor. Kinda moral grey zone.
@@csorbalaszlo1920 Yeah he probably keep the paper in his pocket or on his wall to remember .. man you're not the brightest human to ever live that's for sure.
TLDR, from an unbiased perspective He's not a pedophile. Depending on context, having communication with a minor isn't always bad as long as it's appropriate and not sexual or weird. Sure, they might've made lewd jokes, but that doesn't make him a pedophile
TLDR from an unbiased opinion Grown men shouldn't be talking to minors at all online, and shouldn't be making lewd jokes in the presence of a minor whatsoever.
@@coredefect6134 if it's an online stream then there are no restrictions for any random people popping in and chatting with you there are many loopholes in this situation.
I honestly am not convinced at all he himself said in the tweet that he DID TEXT A MINOR but at the start he was saying he didn’t text a minor? I’ve played my fair share of social deduction games going back on your own word screams guilty also Cody Conner is definitely a clout chaser but I believe he was telling the truth
I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But the fact that he said that he was sexting a minor is not sitting well with me. The best way I could justify that shit is if he was trolling but that shit is not even funny. Shouldn't even be joked about.
Its something they do court, you say you're guilty to get a less severe sentence. in this case, his lawyers probably said he should admit to guilt, in case of him being sentenced. or something but it backfired.
There is a reason I didn’t hop on the “hate disrespect” bandwagon, cause if I had a dollar every time someone tried to get someone else canceled for clout this year, I’d have a part time job at this point. It’s still of course just not ok to talk inappropriately to minors, but the fact people are so quick to take things at face value these days is crazy (like where did all the people who would do some deeper research go?
another reason why his chat logs isnt released is that in this day and age its really easy to make fake messages, so that form evidence is pretty much obsolete now
@@radthelad3902 This is rage bait. Cuz ain't no way you just messed up so badly. You technically care for zokkas problems so yeah I just wanna point that out.
I think it was a jab at the obvious. If he’s banned from twitch and from over 4 years ago he most definitely doesn’t have access to the logs and even if he did there could still be something legally binding him. Only twitch would be able to have those and even then if they didn’t document them these are still accusations to the only point being a rather open interpretation of outcome.
He might be innocent as some states allow the age of consent to be below 18, rather 16 or 17. If Dr. Disrespect's thingy was on those ages 16-17 states, he might be innocent by court. But if the girl he was "grooming" was on the states where the age of consent is 18, yeah he is not like us.
It is still predatory legal or not. 40 something and a minor is weird. Also the age was never confirmed , and its weird to keep saying 17 Didnt watch the video fully so maybe the age was confirmed Edit: It was not
@@xyptul dude you typed the same thing if you just like a girl who is 17 when the age of consent is like 16 in some state, people will just call you weirdo, not an actual violation of a law.
But Dr talking about it what means the NDA is lifted therefore he could release the logs but he doesn't want to because he has something to hide obviously not illegal but bad enough to make his situation even worst I mean Dr already lost his Friends Current and future sponsors And his own company dropped him Technically the only thing he has left is money/his fans and mark what says Dr is a creep what isn't illegal but noone wants to work or even associate with creeps
How I feel personally is that perhaps Doc was saying insulting stuff to the minor like trash-talk over a game. Which the message could still probably be implicated as guilty in out-of-context scenario. Keep in mind, he admitted to "inappropriate messages" to a minor. Not sexual engagement. So what probably happened was it was trash-talk that is taken out of context entirely but because it'll probably reveal something else doc did (Sexist, Racial, or other defamation-constituting messages) that is why he's not leaking the messages himself because it'll open a whole OTHER can of worms to shift it from a Diddy/Drake Situation to another one where he'll lose more money.
If that was true he would have just said so and showed the logs. The fact he's hiding it and being all "well technically the age of consent is..." tells me he's in the wrong.
Have you not heard of a dtuter, this man is basicly saving his carreer rn of course he is nervouse ,ALSO WHY TF DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN CARE SO MUCH CELEBRETIES ARE A STUPID CONCEPT, LEAVE PEOPLE THE FUCK ALONE
You know what people never bring up during this? There were a few popular twitch streamers that left the platform for mixer, Microsoft's streaming platform. Mixer failed and was shut down less than a week before Dr. Disrespect was banned. At the time, Dr. Disrespect was the face of Twitch. Shortly thereafter, big streamers returned from mixer to twitch. They were also not allowed to play with, nor mention his existence.
at the very very best its a 35 year old man with a wife and kids texting a 17 year old with inappropriate jokes which is still pretty weird. even weirder that he doesn't want to show any chatlogs and is bringing up the difference between the age of consent and what a minor is. come on he even edited out that he was talking to a minor on his tweet about the ban after he got backlash he's a certified weirdo
I am and always will be a firm believer of "innocent until proven guilty". Either his accusers need to provide proof, or they need to sit down and shut up.
there is still a core issue that seems that no one is talking about (well, not nearly enough), Dr Disrespect is currently being considered guilty without evidence. he is literally considered guilty until proven innocent by almost everyone. Also, there are chances that he isn't allowed to shared the whisper messages because maybe the other user doesn't want them public or he doesn't have them anymore, maybe they don't even exist anymore, not even on twich side
Dr.Disrespect respect the NDA when the lawsuit was finish. But the people who were lay off started to brag about the Dr.Disrespect crime. So they should have NDA contract on the lawsuit. Unless they by proxy or some kind of grudged. One reason is prevent harassments of the victims from pressures. But the ex Dr.Disrespect manger person had grudged on and abuse friend connection on twitch staff to fired. He use many mean to keep pushing to ban him. That abuse of auth. It was very under hand moves. Plus youtube without proper investigate abuse their power to demote money. So they both of the companies skip investigate.
I never knew much about disrespects case… however I did always hope he was innocent, I also never saw him as a pedo, there is no way he actually did anything like touching a minor.
One reason he could have for not releasing chat logs is either no consent from the "minor" or that the part of the settlement that he or twitch cant talk about the case publicly means he also cant release the chat logs.
I now understand why we are NOT getting a RUclips Rewind this year
Yep everyone in that rewind be a pedo.
It's rewind time! If I controlled rewind I would want dr disrespect Diddy drake cody ko and Kris tyson
Yeah because we didn't get one in 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
@@remaks8405 because 2019 yt rewind sucked
@@JDspeaksFacts youtube just gave up cus they were getting clown on
If my gc was leaked, oh he'll you bet I'd have 5 death sentences, 19 life sentences, 6 solitary confinement sentences
(he'll barely get out of his house)
Same im thinking of leaving them
Are your group chats involving a minor that you don't know?
@@BxIowaIrelandSwAg we ARE minors...
@@ManifoldThug bros before h03s
I'm really happy that we live in a time where nobody needs proof of anything at all. Not to make allegations, and not to defend yourself against. You can just say whatever you want and people will believe it. Absolutely wonderful.
For dumb people, this is sarcasm.
I believe the rise of cupcake leakage actually protects more cupcakes who are more secretive about their stuff
its wayy better than before. mfs used to get the death penalty for no reason lol
Doc admitted it though, he admitted to talking inappropriately with a minor. I gave Doc the benefit of the doubt and was hoping he would defend himself but that stopped when he ADMITTED to it, then edited out minor, them edited it back in once he was caught. And no, I will not believe that dumbass bs that he did that on purpose to trick people because that is the dumbest shit I've ever heard
He litteraly just said that he may have groomed minors but the twitch employee broke the nda so he is in the right
first nikacado , now doctor disrespect? this day is gonna go down in youtube history istg
hi
@dedede121-k3l😒
Idk man I still don't like the doc, even if he didn't break any laws, dude is still a cheating scumbag, that's all I gotta say, and maybe he is innocent
ong
one hell of a time to be alive..
2023 : 😊
2024 : 💀🐈⬛😈👻🎃🫨🥶😪🎉💥💨💦🕳️🔥💯
this is the only time i know what some random emoji spam means
Brainrot emoji spam
i need me a translator
yeah but there were many years with many predators, people just forget or arent in the know at the time it happens.
@@NefariousHourOfMusic we got predators before aliens 😭 predator vs alien irl would be lit imho
5:02 Note that Dr. Disrespect said *the legal age of consent* and was not referring to their age comparative to 18. In some states, the age of consent goes as low as 16.
hell, in europe some countries have the legal age of consent at 15
@joebob4591 those countries also have a limit of 5 years of age difference
@@joebob4591 there is 1 with 12 as age of consent
@@ghosty_wan5943 Wtf no country have a limit of age difference. If both people are above the age of consent they can have any age difference.
@invernofuyu2542 are you a lawyer or something? How do you know there isn't?
The concept is called "Romeo and Juliet laws" look it up.
Today been insane for RUclips news 💀
nah fr tho
What else has happened?
@@spookyt8692Nickacado Avocado dropped a video where he explained a lot of interesting things, and how he has been on a weight loss journey
@@spookyt8692 nikocado avocado lost like 250 pounds. The glowup is crazy
@@spookyt8692Nikacado hasn't been fat in 2 years. Search up "Two Steps Ahead"
bro really said "YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT PEDOPHILIA ISN'T ALLOWED???? FUCKING UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!"
@dedede121-k3lI’d prefer for my heart to stop beating
Physicist Respect (evil Dr Disrespect): *gives an actual apology and takes accountability and he is regretful of his actions.*
😂😂
@dedede121-k3I go somewhere else plz I don't care +L ratio +didn't ask + bot + no father = YOU
@dedede121-k3lcan you say my mom's heart, cause i don't like her
nobody seems to understand that he most likely is not allowed to release these chat logs because that's still bound by the rules of the lawsuit and the agreement, just like how nobody involved in the lawsuit is allowed to talk about or discuss it in the first place, so of course he hasn't shared them
I didn't think of that but that has to be the reason (hopefully)
@@Prismarine1 it is the reason. he been said before that he would have showed the chat messages but he is banned from twitch where said incident took place. cant show something that you dont have access to. as far as why TWITCH who HAS access to these things has not said anything well then yea probably is because of the lawsuit and whatnot. its a lot going on so idk.
I don't even think that the doc has access to those logs in the first place, Twitch has them.
Once you get banned on twitch you can't log into your account.
@@perpetually. not to mention that if they are released, and they show everything he said, it would do so much damage to twitch. I still believe he didn't know at the time of the messages the user was underage, this happened all in conjunction with him cheating on his wife. While he should have vetted his DMS a bit better I think he neglected that and had an adult conversation with a minor. I'm saying "adult" like the way you would be talking to someone you know, where jokes are jokes and they don't get taken out of context because the other person is a minor. I doubt we will ever know, and at the end of the day his wife knows all about this, the leak isn't the first time she is hearing about this and she decided to forgive him, so who are we to talk about it anyway.
Dude within 24 hours Nick Avocato got skinny and Dr. Disrespect RESPONDED????? This is history being made right here (and apparently a rblx ytuber got exposed) (and Bella The Wolf got doxxed what?????)
Caseoh is next on here
@@ChristopherPortorreal-ol2mj that would be the glow up of the century
@@SneedleGD yeah we got nikocado losing 250 pounds in a heartbeat so fast I bet caseoh can do the same. Caseohs weight won't stop him from dropping
@@ChristopherPortorreal-ol2mjit was 2 years but still fast
@@JA6XN caseoh better pick up on this
why’s everyone diddying on minors rn guys it’s not that hard to not like kids
ppl seem to think I like kids and that’s not what im saying so srry if I worded it wrong (im a kid)
I like moms named Stephanie
Apparently it’s difficult since those people keep doing it
People have been doing this forever morons are just thinking it’s a new thing because it’s happening to public figures in the media. This is pure evil and it’s always existed just look at Islam
@@Randomybored AHAHAHHA WTF
@@TotallynotXolt-w8j well clearly they’re weird cuz those r kids
dr disrespect still doesn' acknowledge the fact he said inappropriate jokes to some girl whos WAYY younger than him when he was double her age
Maybe he could say "fuck your mom" and that count as inappropriate
Hes 50?
Dr diddy
@@NoNameTaken117 yeah, mid-late 50s
He’s like 43 and he was 34 at the time. Still messed up regardless
WHAT TF IS THIS YEAR BRO???
2024
it's a leap year, and leap years tend to be quite mediocre. Think of 2020 as an example.
Few more months till 25...
These 4 Years have been a Rollercoaster of Emotions, Technoblade's Death, Dream Face Reveal, Mr Beast and Dr Disrespect's Allegations, Colby Getting Cancer, Sam Breaking up with Kat, COVID, Flus etc
@@Kurosawa-Official remember when we were kids and used to have anime battles with toy figurines? I used to smash small cars by sliding them real hard while aligned with the wall against my lil bro's...
Fun, innocent times
I have a feeling this MIGHT be like a pyrocynical situation. where he ISN'T a pedo but the chatlogs have very embarrassing shit in them that he doesn't want to get out. so he's trying to prove the best he can he's NOT a pedo without releasing his embarrassing secrets. whether it be fetishes, hobbies or anything else.
I geuss..
He already did say it was a minor though so I don't know about that
very
He already said that the person he texted was a minor and then deleted that. He's trying to cover up his tracks guaranteed, it's not the same situation.
if his case is still going hes not allowed to show them. right?
Homie has the worst PR team if he genuinely thinks going "haha i said stuff to make you infer I was a pedo just to say im not gottem" makes him look good
You infer he's a pedo based on what exactly?
So here's what I got from his response,
The reason why he didn't talk about the ban or the tweet was from legal actions (which is understandable). Cody cherry picked random texts from his chat logs to make it look like he was intentionally sexting a minor, and though he was talking bad towards her, he claims his intentions were to never be intimate with her. And he never attempted to meet up with this girl nor ever met her in the first place.
I will be honest, I am kind of neutral on this as well and would like to see the chat logs if everything he says is true.
@@wertzupok1113bot
@@wertzupok1113 dont threaten me with a good time
sadly we'll probably never get the chat logs as twitch got rid of the whispers section a while ago.
I don't think we can legally get the chat logs, also it's none of our fuckin businesses either so Doc does have a point there we shouldn't act like second graders forcing it out of him when he most likely legally can't do that, I mean the oath of silence was there for a reason, Cody doing this shit breaks it and putting those messages out there would push Doc over the edge even more in a legal stand point
@@GoId3nWrId I mean I understand, he had some legal barriers that prevented him from speaking about it, but I don't know why he admitted to it when he claimed it wasn't true. Unless he took some sort of plea deal, I think he's lying
bro is not convincing us 😭🙏
edit: please let me have my own opinion. just because I said "us" this did not mean I was telling you to think the same thing. this generation is not cooked just because I made a comment stating how dr disrespect's argument did not exactly convince me.
😂😭
He literally admitted the first time. How the hell does the think he will "convince" us he did nothing wrong
sigma gyat
"Me? Diddle kids? I would NEVER do thaaaaat"
@@sxvxgx5891 It's no good diddling kids
8:17 thank you
What's super crazy to me, a lot of people are focusing on her being 17 and saying "he isn't technically a pedophile because she is too old", "a 17 year old knows what they are doing", "there's nothing wrong with this she is old enough", most if not all of them would completely change their tune if they had a daughter. "It's fine and she knows what she is doing" turns into "Get away from my daughter you degenerate you are too old for her". Anyone who says that they would be fine with it if he was rich is a liar.
Edit is my spelling.
Even if they had the same age I think most people would still not be happy with it, it's not about the age gap it's about protecting your loved ones.
There is nothing magical between a 17 year old and an 18 year old. It's a superficial difference. Science shows us today that people don't stop maturing mentally until past their 30s. The US has set the legal age to be 18 but other countries have it lower. Trying to gauge morality from something as superficial from a single year difference is funny in my opinion.
What you're insinuating is that if someone has an 18 year old daughter, they would then automatically be fine if some random 30 year old started hitting on them. The answer is still going to be no, not because of legal issues, but because of personal moral reasons. Most people naturally wouldn't want to form a relationship where the two people are over a decade apart.
Meanwhile all these same people will turn right around and attack Kris Tyson, for inappropriate jokes in the proximity of minor, yet defend Dr Disrespect whom was directly contacting one with intent.
It's not just the number. First of all, 17 would be like...best case scenario for him (still wrong imo) and I would bet she wasn't even that. These ppl don't go after numbers cuz they like numbers...they go after naivity and innocence. It's one thing if a 55 yr old man gets with a 30 yr old woman...and a completely different thing if a (insert adult age) tries to get with a teenager. It's not the gap...it's the age of the younger individual that makes it predatory. Nothing funny about it, either. Anyone who uses the defense of..."age of consent where they live" arguement....is a piece of predatory shit.
@@dannydome In my opinion, there's no functional difference between a 17 and 18 year old. The law is perfectly fine for anyone to do anything with an 18 year old, but then people see it as a moral issue if they are 17. Yes, there is a problem when it comes to people seeking naivety and innocence, but that's still a subjective thing and you can have adults who are more innocent in terms of mental development. It's not black and white.
Man everyone started liking minors like it's a trend 💀👍 ( edit : y'all take a chill pill jeez...)
lol fr
@dedede121-k3l srry I'm reporting you for spamming
I'm not sorry@@commie596
Its literally a trend in Instagram reels
I hopped on the trend
This was EXACTLY my theory, that we're going into a redemption era of 2024.
Edit: I've made a severe lapse in my judgement
Eh, 50/50
@@hewkiithetiscytofficialcha8903 fair, but usually one thing happens and everyone follows. One youtuber retired, multiple more after. One person exposed as a predator, multiple others right after. Nikocado redeemed himself (and I'm pretty sure EDP did too) and now Dr. Disrespect has too, so basically it probably means like 3 or 4 people will follow.
@@WafflesONTOOOOOP EDP without a doubt messaged a minor and has not even apologized for it he shouldnt be on internet if he wants to redeem his life he can do so in private but he shouldnt have the option to continue in a place where'd he have the ability to contact children. And as for the doc if he is innocent showing the messages should be no problem but he said he hasnt and probably wont instead hes trying to make this a "politics" thing. I dont know if he did it but god knows i believe him trying to avoiding showing proof will make him seem more guilty then anything.
@@miloszkolano4362 that wasn't really my point, but I see what you're getting at
Probably, but not really. Because things have gotten a lot worse for everything and everyone since 2023.
0:27 most average thing in 2024
@wertzupok1113 bruh I'm not stupid
@@wertzupok1113 bro
@@wertzupok1113 dont threaten me with a good time.
Ah sh*t, here we go again.
brother you are not helping anyone out
The Doc said an I quote "Were there twitch whisper messages with an individual minor back in 2017? The answer is yes."
as well as
"These were casual mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of inappropriate"
and
"from a moral standpoint I absolutely take responsibility. I should have never entertained these conversations to begin with. That's on me. That's on me as an adult, a husband and a father. It should have never happened. I get it. I'm not perfect and I'll fucking own my shit. This was stupid."
His stream said otherwise sadly Doc is now pointing fingers and placing blame. He's not even owning up to anything wrong that he clearly did based on what his statement said smh.....Doc is 100% still a pdf file and guilty simple as that.
@@yaygenmills why he ai't in jail tho
Investigations into it exonerated him of wrong doing -- no sexting occurred. When he said he "inappropriately DM'd a minor" he didn't mean sexually and again it was investigated and proved that no grooming or sexual things were said or done. The logs are off limits due to the lawsuit that Twitch LOST over this. No soliciting of a minor occurred. --- In his now deleted post about this he said he inappropriately DM'd a minor.
People ran wild with this calling it an admission of guilt of sexually DMing or grooming a minor. the word "inappropriate" can mean nearly anything and does not automatically mean it was some deviant sexual nature.
@@OsmosisMaple Citation needed for the exact nature of the DMs because he never said it wasn't sexual in nature at all. Once again reread the quotes. Where did I state he was or was not soliciting anything? You are just as fast to jump to conclusions as the opposition you face.
He admitted what he did was morally wrong, I'm going to take his stance on the matter too.
@@OsmosisMaple The logs are off limits because they're not allowed to release a minors communications under most circumstances, not because Twitch lost anything. It's to protect the identity of a minor.
I feel like this is Doc’s last attempt to try to make himself seem good, like talking to a minor is NOoOoOT the same as the group chats, and then he js starts tweakin out 😭🙏
i will say Dr disrespect is kinda winning, because, if they were to call him a Pedo, at least have some proves, there are at least 1 image of prove for every youtuber to be cancelled, they didn't interview the "Victim" nor him or don't even explains the whole thing as a whole. And i am not fan of him nor a hater, but you shouldn't NEVER and EVER accused someone with no prove to back it up.
We know that the accuser has to show proof and not the accused what normally would be the right way but here is a thing
Dr said that "i made sure to mention minor" for baiting the public to accuse him being a PDF therefore he created a lie to make the public to accuse him and in this scenario Dr the accused therefore he dont has to show any proof
But since it was a lie for rage bait Dr accused the public to calling him a PDF therefore the public became the accused what's mean that Dr has to show a proof
If Dr wanna take this to court the the video gonna be the evidence about he
Created a lie to make people's think he's a PDF
Dr aint gonna get nothing from this on couty
Its not a win and his "im playing 4D chess" failed miserably and even backfired
He really tried to spark that two braincell
@@csorbalaszlo1920 yea
just like with koofy no PROPER proof of koofy being kelogish
@@coolhaircutguy koofy legit admitted it to his friend
@@coolhaircutguy Koofy's situation at least have people that (kaka hide their identity so dik lol) provide them proves, and kaka also research himself and and look into his account, that's why it's obvious, but there were no prove for Dr Disrespect or, the predator you may
if i was him, i would say "nah that aint why i got banned, stay mad"
Then people will hate you even more saying you did something worse
@@lag690 I didn't say that, you did
Bros a secret 4 chan user😂@@UnlockedANDunleashed
Bro thought he was cooking 😭
@@aranyaki9714 this is my highest rated comment ever I don’t get it
Kris Tyson, MrBeast allegations, Dr. Disrespect, and now Lunchly. This year doesn’t stop with news.
Releasing chatlogs without each party's consent is actually against data privacy laws so the Doc might not even be allowed to make them public...
And he doesnt have access to this logs, his account is BANNED. Only twitch can access that.
@@MobsterYTB Yeah, that's true as well. But deciding sections might be in the court documents.
@@Luckyluckyluc For sure, maybe when all the legal process ends we can see this logs... for now, i think its classified.
@@MobsterYTB Yeah, it surely is classified for the reasons I stated in my original comment but the Doc might have an original copy. The thing is, it's probably not the whole chat log but just the bits important for the investigation so even if he were to show them it probably wouldn't even prove much more than what he already said in his statement. The context people are eager for won't be served with that either so there isn't really anything he can even do at this point.
Doc took me to his private island. It was a great experience with minor inconveniences.
*conveniences
@@TurtleChad1 Turtle, sorry to bring up stuff but what is all this about you having UTTP creeps around your discord server?
@dedede121-k3I go somewhere else plz I don't care +L ratio +didn't ask + bot + no father = YOU
Joke is so unfunny atp
@dedede121-k3l please shut up
0:16 if you guys have no Wi-Fi
Thank you very usefull
Not every single human being is interested in this bs
@@SharpVladd your welcome for the translation
@@_Mhd_ ?
TF you mean WI-FI, Y'all use Wi-Fi?. I use mobile data
he likely can't show the messages because when you're banned you can no longer access them. it would be more troubling IF he had them saved prior to getting banned, that would somewhat admit he knew he was doing something wrong.
Twitch is really the party that controls the whispers which is why they put as part of the settlement even if he got his hands on t hem he could not release them. so if people want to see the whispers they have to pressure twitch not doc. doc doesn't control the chat logs THEY DO, and if you haven't seen those logs in 4 years from twitch that means it looks bad ON TWITCH, meaning there's nothing there and it would be obvious that the partner manager was framing him to get him banned.
This message brought to you by bobblawblaw's law blog
@jeffreykiyabu2577 it is a good point though
@jeffreykiyabu2577 it is a good point though
Since it turned into a settlement, I’m sure Doc has the logs saved somewhere. Paper trails paper trails.
Good point
Honestly, everyone's obsessed with these " chat logs " but I'm just waiting for the end result. Someone's getting retribution, I don't care who. I want to see one side's head canon or fantasy story shatter to a million pieces.
What kinda supervillain answer is this 😭😭🙏🙏
bro what 😭😭 bro woke up on the wrong side of the bed
2:14 ……Dr.Respect😳
Ew.
Lol
His alter-ego?!
@@imareezy4391yeah, that one
@@YourLocalBaconYLB RUclips translations have goals beyond your understanding, my understanding, or any of our understanding.
he might be meaning that the minor (being under 18) is over the legal age of consent assuming they live in "those" specific states in the US, aka, they are a minor (under 18) but above age of consent (above 16)
yeah once bro said "above the legal age of consent" you know immediately they're under the age of adulthood
@@TheYardninjanot exactly. Because this happened on whisper, which is online, it falls under federal jurisdiction where the AOC is 18.
@@claudius_drusus_which clause does that fall under I'm not familiar with it
@@claudius_drusus_ the girl was confirmed under 18 at the time. There's nothing left to discuss in the Docs own words "What I did was wrong, I was stupid."
@@claudius_drusus_ That's not why. If it was federal, it would be because it happened across state lines, I believe. Not necessarily because it was on the Internet.
16-17 is still illegal if you say stuff online, legally the age of consent online is 18. He removed the 'minor' part because he didn't wanna consider it that since they weren't where they lived. What he said wasn't illegal but he 100% said some creepy stuff to someone he shouldn't have.
selective outrage.
Where did he say he was 17
@@Myder_Dragon where did he say over 17?
@@Ritticle He didn't, that's my point
No; talking sexually to minors on the internet is not illegal, actually having sex is. And evidence can be brought against you.
There’s no way ppl are still glazing this guy. He literally admitted to it himself 😞
Did you watch the vid
Doc made the Response tweet to bait and troll all those that wanted to slander him, waited and then deleted the tweet
Did you even watch the video lol. That was kinda the point. To bait out the liars at Twitch. An admission is NOT evidence, not even in a legal trial in court...and they all fell for it.
@@ZoMTDU stupidest thing he could do honestly
@@Sly9192 This reminds me of when Drake said all the pedo shit was part of his master plan all along to bait people.
8:39
Doc should really just release the logs if he swears theres nothing wrong as he's trying to 'save his reputation'. Him calling the public '12, and immature' for wanting that, is self incriminating and suspicious of anything they couldve potentially been talking about that is weird on any level
I am confident he can't release the logs due to legal reasons........
but him calling people.childish and immature cause they won't take his word when he Admitted to being INAPPRIATE WITH A MINOR whatever the reason may be........like he can't expect people to take his word instantly
He can’t release it unless all party agrees. The girl has to agree to release
@@sunnyx213 You dont know that. Thats conjecture.
@@rebotsomat Sure, we don't know shit, only he said she said, yet people are throwing pdf accusations freely :D
@@johnwalker3602 saying that you inappropriately messaged a minor is pretty cut and dry. Now hes trying to paint it differently. Its so obvious.
1:05 bro just walkin in circles
Just like doctor pdf is 😂
that's how I normally talk on the phone as well tbh
40 year old talking to someone underaged is sus enough.
Him acting like chat asking for messages is childish is a huge red flag.
If the chat logs is being used as evidence in court, which, I fucking hope they would be used, then he isn't allowed to show them to the public until after the case.
Trying to respond to the allegations but the evidence is too much. He had everything, but got the drake virus and chose minors instead. Now he’s trying to act like it was nothing? I have nothing but disrespect for this man.
@@MixtriesV1 I think because this is a case of fame and well some women just want fame and Dr. Disrespect is somebody to flirt and cheat with people so it's not surprising
Real
@dedede121-k3lcap
Wasnt she 17? I mean its not this far away from 18 so is it really this bad?
@@RejectedArtistFromAustria I don't think he said that, he did say I think, that the age where this person was from is the Legal Age of Consent cause some states in the US are 16, 17 etc. But I feel like there is still some legal lines crossed here, maybe not heavy ones like CSAM material, none of that happened it seems
More states in the US have the age of consent as 16 than 18. Over 30 states have 16 as the age of consent, and he said the person was 17 in the video, so he's got a 2/3s chance of being innocent of these charges solely on that. And if that's the case, all those news outlets and youtubers who jumped the gun on an accusation are guilty of libel and he's probably suing the hell out of several of them too.
On the logs: Doc is banned from Twitch so he probably cannot even access his account to get the chat logs. That means Twitch would be the one withholding the chat logs, not Doc. And it sounds alot like the case is being re-arbitrated, and they're going to be paying out the ass for Cody's fuckup, so as long as that's happening, there's no way in hell they're going to be posting them. Not when they're essentially material evidence in the arbitration.
The one sure thing here: Cody is turbo-fucked. Twitch will be suing them for breaching NDA, Doc will be suing them for libel. They're absolutely screwed.
Thank you bruh someone who actually understands, like really? Asking for chat logs that the Doc himself can’t even access because he’s terminated? Like come on bruh
Interstate age of consent is 18. We know she isn't in his state because the age of consent is 18 in Cali. The colloquial (common usage and not the literal dictionary definition) definition of pedophilia doesn't stop once someone exceeds the age of consent, it's applied to anyone prowling on children regardless of age of consent. Dr. Dumbshit won't be suing anyone since that would allow opposing lawyers to pursue his personal phone records in discovery. Also, he straight up admitted to it so the defense against libel is the truth that he told everyone.
@@DivinetheSamurai Who is to say the chat logs aren't in Twitch's or even discord's database?
Hopefully the authorities reveal them at full soon.
Clearly you didn't read the comment..@@TheOmegaJello
and also twitch got rid of the whisper messaging system so he wouldn't be able to access them anyways
BUDDY if my group chats got leaked they dont even have to take that out of context and im STILL serving 10 death sentences💀
4:54 It's not that confusing, at the time he probably thought she WAS a minor, probably because that's what everyone else was saying, but, from what he also says later, apparently in the region she lives in, she was actually NOT a minor. Which means she may have been British/European. It's important to note that she also said she didn't want to report anything but Twitch went against her wishes...why? What was the reason for that? I know but I'd like other people to work it out. Because it's a VENDETTA.
Fr people are so fucking rude and don't believe him even after he responded, there is literally pure evidence, I'm glad you agree that he's telling the truth, like he literally has a fucking wife, and curse left out Dr disrespect saying he was texting a fan.
As a British person, if you're 30 talking to a 16 year old, YOU ARE A PEDO. It's MORALLY WRONG.
Had a wife*@@Spacegames-365
yall both right and the memes and shit make it hardto focus and with the slightest bit of yapping which isn't much but the slightest bit just throws me off and i gotta refocus and it's hard for me to think of logical reasons and play detective
he's screw now sadly unless something happens fast
if the logs are something like a minor trauma dumping to him, then that would kind tie up all the little details we have; being sexual but not innappropriate and justifying why he can’t go into any detail, getting banned by strict adherence to rules but not facing any criminal charges, etc. to me it really seems like it’s that.
He would absolutely never have been banned if that's all it was. You can't control what someone else does and you'd NEVER get banned for that in texts
@@ralfred2009you overestimate people’s abilities to stay professional and not show favouritism or to not fuck people over purely based on the fact they don’t like them.
@@ralfred2009 Nope, twitch banned for way less like the jidion perma ban for "brigading" someone who is is friend.
Furthermore the logs were looked at by authorities, so dr disrespect didn't sext anyone the question is did he get weird or was it something like @geatmasta says it could be.
Don't translate...
भवतः हृदयस्य धड़कनं कतिपयेषु घण्टेषु स्थगयिष्यति, अस्य शापस्य मुक्तिं प्राप्तुं एकमात्रं मार्गं मम चैनलस्य सदस्यतां कुर्वन्तु. .. ....
In the community of world of tanks blitz, about a month ago the biggest youtuber, droodles, has been 'outed' for similar accusations and he took his channel down. After 2 weeks, he made it public again and explained his perspective, and he's back at 100k again. Some interesting similarities can be observed between these situations.
01:40 those tweets CRAZY
fr😂
Lf green gogeta😭🙏@@ExSpheriment
@@ShadowTheHedgehog-o7t talk English 😭🙏
@@999lilo that is english😭🙏
@@999lilo do you play dragon ball legends
Bro is not beating the allegations😭🙏
@dedede121-k3I go somewhere else plz I don't care +L ratio +didn't ask + bot + no father = YOU
u don’t gotta cry about it
😂😂
He pretty much did
@@InfantryWomanNot really
Bro I started watching u since u were 10k and now ur 220k time really flies😭
Confidential because of the court case.. he cant show screenshots plus we believed Cody with NO PROOF AT ALL?? So whats different from him saying this and cody saying stuff but he looks clearly upset about twitch backstabbing him.
The proof was him admitting it numb nuts
just love how people NEVER watched the video of him stating that he was saying "I DIDNT SEX THE MINOR" alot seem to missed the part when he said that
Are you saying it’s okay to chat with a minor even if you don’t sex them? Thats concerning to think like that
@@a2dx376 im not saying that WATCH THE VIDEO AND READ THE COMMENT BEFORE SPEAKING
@@a2dx376 it's not illegal, get over yourself
It doesn't even matter at this point. Dr Disrespect is married and has children, no excuse for talking inappropriately to teenagers
Over 200k subs in only a couple months is crazy. Keep up the good work man
"It was an misinput!!" ahh move😭🙏
dude this year is the CRAZIEST year I've ever lived bro
if he was innocent he'd show the messages from the beginning
They are part ofnthe nda whichbis technically still in effect
@@paulrasmussen8953 i may be stupid
He legally can’t
He physically can, bro has been explaining everything that would be against the nda. The only thing bro hasn't shared is the logs 💀
Dear Curse,
Please ban the mf MrBeast Bot.
Thank you,
Yours Dearest
Nils
The shortest email I've seen
@@User1987-n8fstop😂
@@User1987-n8f Simple and straightforward
Fr
4:50 legal age of consent doesn't mean they're not a minor just means they're legally able to make decisions around sex
Maybe what he said didnt make much sense, BUT TH8S COMMENT MAKES EVEN LESS NGL
So why is he getting hated on for it being perfectly legal? It was some messages, and nothing was wrong with him even sexting someone.
@@SarcasticBeingYes just because something is legal doesn't meaning it isn't weird or screwed up
@@Config555 this comment makes perfects sense. The most common age of consent, found in 31 states, is 16 yrs old., meaning STILL A MINOR and not 18. So Dr.'s arguement is that although they werent an adult (18yr+), they were at least the appropriate age for the jurisdiction(the state they live in), which seems like a stupid arguement cause theyre still a minor. Kinda moral grey zone.
@@Chris_OTW I know, its just the way they worded it
Daddy curse just dropped
@dedede121-k3I go somewhere else plz I don't care +L ratio +didn't ask + bot + no father = YOU
How did bro say that
@@cursedalotKISS ME
@@cursedalotpwease
Dr Disrespect can't share the logs as part of the NDA.
Lol he literally talks about EVERYTHING the NDA would block him from talking about except for the logs.
this comment is not true, the reason he cant show the logs is beacause he doesnt have the logs, only ones that can share it is Twitch themself
@@goldthelantern8644 he was in court therefore he has to have the chat logs even if it was a printed paper therefore you wrong
@@csorbalaszlo1920 Yeah he probably keep the paper in his pocket or on his wall to remember .. man you're not the brightest human to ever live that's for sure.
@@isaacgove He had to talk about it cause of that guy who open his mouth. That's not against the law to defend yourself.
TLDR, from an unbiased perspective
He's not a pedophile. Depending on context, having communication with a minor isn't always bad as long as it's appropriate and not sexual or weird. Sure, they might've made lewd jokes, but that doesn't make him a pedophile
TLDR from an unbiased opinion
Grown men shouldn't be talking to minors at all online, and shouldn't be making lewd jokes in the presence of a minor whatsoever.
@@coredefect6134 Sure, but he isn't a pedophile solely because of that
@@coredefect6134 if it's an online stream then there are no restrictions for any random people popping in and chatting with you there are many loopholes in this situation.
He kinda sounds like Chris Chan handling a troll
@dedede121-k3I go somewhere else plz I don't care +L ratio +didn't ask + bot + no father = YOU
@dedede121-k3l Don't reply...
@@Bruggerss he still has the mister beast pfp dont expect anything
@@hokton8555 ik
I honestly am not convinced at all he himself said in the tweet that he DID TEXT A MINOR but at the start he was saying he didn’t text a minor? I’ve played my fair share of social deduction games going back on your own word screams guilty also Cody Conner is definitely a clout chaser but I believe he was telling the truth
I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But the fact that he said that he was sexting a minor is not sitting well with me.
The best way I could justify that shit is if he was trolling but that shit is not even funny. Shouldn't even be joked about.
So why do you believe his words, but then dont believe his words.
@@real_rutmen Cody Conner said something that wasn’t supposed to be said for clout be what he said is truth I believe
@@Cartisu same
Its something they do court, you say you're guilty to get a less severe sentence. in this case, his lawyers probably said he should admit to guilt, in case of him being sentenced. or something but it backfired.
There is a reason I didn’t hop on the “hate disrespect” bandwagon, cause if I had a dollar every time someone tried to get someone else canceled for clout this year, I’d have a part time job at this point. It’s still of course just not ok to talk inappropriately to minors, but the fact people are so quick to take things at face value these days is crazy (like where did all the people who would do some deeper research go?
6:34 if my texts were leaked god dam those jokes would get me cancelled
I don't care what he said
show the logs G
if not keep it moving
another reason why his chat logs isnt released is that in this day and age its really easy to make fake messages, so that form evidence is pretty much obsolete now
2024 going wild
Dr disrespecting the age of consent
Diddy
Drake
MrBeast downfall
Nikokado villain arc
Koofy double life
you should stop watching others problems and fix your own
@@radthelad3902 This is rage bait. Cuz ain't no way you just messed up so badly. You technically care for zokkas problems so yeah I just wanna point that out.
Man this is going to be the most craziest year
- Show us the evidence
- WhaT aRe We In a sEcOnD gRadE??
Exactly xd "Evidence? Proof? I don't have those words in my dictionary."
I think it was a jab at the obvious. If he’s banned from twitch and from over 4 years ago he most definitely doesn’t have access to the logs and even if he did there could still be something legally binding him. Only twitch would be able to have those and even then if they didn’t document them these are still accusations to the only point being a rather open interpretation of outcome.
Internet controversies aren’t even true half the time
I guess you're right(?)
@@hewkiithetiscytofficialcha8903he is right
This gameplay makes me happy. Keep up the good work
Over the legal age of consent is not the same as not a minor. A minor is someone under the age of full legal responsibility.
He might be innocent as some states allow the age of consent to be below 18, rather 16 or 17.
If Dr. Disrespect's thingy was on those ages 16-17 states, he might be innocent by court.
But if the girl he was "grooming" was on the states where the age of consent is 18, yeah he is not like us.
It is still predatory legal or not. 40 something and a minor is weird. Also the age was never confirmed , and its weird to keep saying 17
Didnt watch the video fully so maybe the age was confirmed
Edit: It was not
@@yapyapyup how is it weird if its over the age of consent? I feel like yall are just strecthing and grasping at this point.
Tell me you don't know the difference between "age of consent" and "age of majority" without telling me you don't know it
@@yapyapyup it is confirmed in 2017 that Dr. Disrespect's groomed victim WAS 17 years old.
@@xyptul dude
you typed the same thing
if you just like a girl who is 17 when the age of consent is like 16 in some state, people will just call you weirdo, not an actual violation of a law.
im glad i stayed neutral on picking sides on this it didnt make much sense of people calling him a pedo with no hardcore evidence
This is the year of comebacks, Nikacado and Dr Disrespect making it back again.
6:50 Same bro i would be wanted in 39 Countries 😂
A minor is under 18.
Legal age if concent, in most places, is 16
2 things can be true at the same time
6:54 Same here bro
Don’t let them leak the gc🤫🤫
WHAT DA HALLL
Same tho.. 💀
Bro why is this year a jidion vid 💀
A minor is someone under the age of 18 so if they were over the age of 16 then they could've consented to this
He said he cant release anything because of the lawsuit, maybe that's why he hasn't released the chat logs?
But Dr talking about it what means the NDA is lifted therefore he could release the logs but he doesn't want to because he has something to hide obviously not illegal but bad enough to make his situation even worst
I mean Dr already lost his
Friends
Current and future sponsors
And his own company dropped him
Technically the only thing he has left is money/his fans and mark what says Dr is a creep what isn't illegal but noone wants to work or even associate with creeps
How I feel personally is that perhaps Doc was saying insulting stuff to the minor like trash-talk over a game. Which the message could still probably be implicated as guilty in out-of-context scenario. Keep in mind, he admitted to "inappropriate messages" to a minor. Not sexual engagement. So what probably happened was it was trash-talk that is taken out of context entirely but because it'll probably reveal something else doc did (Sexist, Racial, or other defamation-constituting messages) that is why he's not leaking the messages himself because it'll open a whole OTHER can of worms to shift it from a Diddy/Drake Situation to another one where he'll lose more money.
If that was true he would have just said so and showed the logs.
The fact he's hiding it and being all "well technically the age of consent is..." tells me he's in the wrong.
@@Myder_Dragon You didn't read.
I feel like this year is just not the year 😅
The number of things that have already happened this year is scary 😨
He streamed today and still has 40k + viewers. Pretty sure no one really gives a shit anymore about what he did
5:33 bro really hesitated on that one
Who cares people need just leave people alone
Have you not heard of a dtuter, this man is basicly saving his carreer rn of course he is nervouse ,ALSO WHY TF DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN CARE SO MUCH CELEBRETIES ARE A STUPID CONCEPT, LEAVE PEOPLE THE FUCK ALONE
You know what people never bring up during this? There were a few popular twitch streamers that left the platform for mixer, Microsoft's streaming platform. Mixer failed and was shut down less than a week before Dr. Disrespect was banned. At the time, Dr. Disrespect was the face of Twitch. Shortly thereafter, big streamers returned from mixer to twitch. They were also not allowed to play with, nor mention his existence.
bro pulled out the age of consent laws 😭🙏
That’s what they’re there for.
and why wouldn't he? That's the basis of this whole thing
Guess who wasn’t found guilty in the court system. You probably have no idea what you’re talking about. Smh
@@randoff9136Pretty sure it was settled out of court if I'm remembering correctly
at the very very best its a 35 year old man with a wife and kids texting a 17 year old with inappropriate jokes which is still pretty weird. even weirder that he doesn't want to show any chatlogs and is bringing up the difference between the age of consent and what a minor is. come on he even edited out that he was talking to a minor on his tweet about the ban after he got backlash he's a certified weirdo
I am and always will be a firm believer of "innocent until proven guilty". Either his accusers need to provide proof, or they need to sit down and shut up.
6:45 I’d prolly get cancelled
I’d probably get buried in an unmarked grave with everyone I knew or knew of me forget me
I like your words funny man
6:40 uhh well i mean he is not wrong tho
it's not like you did anything illegal tho, right..
@@justawhisp4160the slurs used 💀
But if you did nothing wrong why he dosen't show anything LOL
@@ghost_bulr142legal obligation
@@ghost_bulr142Uh... Legal Stuff!??? if his show it then his losing his legal card lol!
there is still a core issue that seems that no one is talking about (well, not nearly enough), Dr Disrespect is currently being considered guilty without evidence. he is literally considered guilty until proven innocent by almost everyone. Also, there are chances that he isn't allowed to shared the whisper messages because maybe the other user doesn't want them public or he doesn't have them anymore, maybe they don't even exist anymore, not even on twich side
God i swear half of youtube commemters share 1 individual braincell
fr.
Dr.Disrespect respect the NDA when the lawsuit was finish. But the people who were lay off started to brag about the Dr.Disrespect crime. So they should have NDA contract on the lawsuit. Unless they by proxy or some kind of grudged. One reason is prevent harassments of the victims from pressures. But the ex Dr.Disrespect manger person had grudged on and abuse friend connection on twitch staff to fired. He use many mean to keep pushing to ban him. That abuse of auth. It was very under hand moves. Plus youtube without proper investigate abuse their power to demote money. So they both of the companies skip investigate.
I never knew much about disrespects case… however I did always hope he was innocent, I also never saw him as a pedo, there is no way he actually did anything like touching a minor.
man wtf happend to the internet this world wide web used to be so peaceful but now everything is just thrown in the dumpster
same question. It's like even my recommended page has gone to shiet
Since when was the internet peaceful💀
The Internet was never peaceful
sit back and just watch.... dark times are coming
@@Accountthatexists when yt consisted of nothing but videos like "i went to the zoo"
dr no respect left: guys the person was a minor. guys the person wasn't a minor
One reason he could have for not releasing chat logs is either no consent from the "minor" or that the part of the settlement that he or twitch cant talk about the case publicly means he also cant release the chat logs.
Brother needs to tell us the game in the background
1:35 twitter users thinking using the n word makes them cool 💀
Sigma sigma
Honestly agree, like yeah you can use the n-word but being repetitive abt it just makes you so corny