Why San Francisco Airport Can Be a Challenging Place to Land 🧠 Air Disasters | Smithsonian Channel
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- With high traffic and compact runways, San Francisco International Airport has a reputation as a difficult place to land. How much did that factor into in the crash of Asiana Flight 214, on July 6, 2013?
Watch Full Episodes Here: www.smithsonia...
Paramount+ is here! Stream all your favorite shows now on Paramount+. Try it FREE at bit.ly/3qyOeOf
#AirDisasters #SmithsonianChannel
Subscribe to The Smithsonian Aviation Channel: bit.ly/2UNavJO
Twitter: bit.ly/33lH712
Instagram: bit.ly/3iw9Iay
Facebook: bit.ly/3kkVOZp
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
when plane crashes happen and at the end happy music plays
To be honest they are kinda smart in a way it lifts my mood a bit
I have a theory the AP has control to auto throttle so maybe when they turned of the AP the auto throttle stayed on and it could have failed and it might have reduced power increasing the sink rate causing the crash.I know it is crazy.
They had the autopilot (AP) and autothrottles (AT) both on. They were in Flight Level Change mode with altitude 0 selected. Even after the AP was disconnected, the AT remained on, commanding the motors to a low power setting for descent to 0 feet as "commanded". You can raise the nose, but without power, the airspeed simply bleeds off. You need power to arrest the descent rate (there's some low speed protections if you get really slow, but it's too complicated to explain here). But the plane did exactly what is was commanded to do. It was descending at low power to an altitude of 0 feet. Not an uncommon command for a plane that was above glidepath (although 1000 ft is more commonly used instead of 0, "just in case", as was this case). All they had to do was disconnect the AT and push the power up, or change modes.The problem is that the captain (new to the Boeing 777) did not change modes when they got to a proper visual glidepath. He was coming from an Airbus, and those throttles operate differently and he wasn't used to disconnecting or overriding the AT. The Check Airman (instructor pilot) failed to instruct/intervene (I blame him, not the "student" captain). The pilot in the jumpseat could have just put his foot on the throttles and shoved them forward. But he just watched it all happen. Call me a racist, but that's the asian culture. They've been hammered for many decades by the NTSB for that. They simply don't benefit from multi-crew teamwork (lack of). Better to crash than insult the captain by telling him to change mode to Vertical Speed when they got established on (and went through) the visual glidepath (or saying, "push the f-ing throttles up"). This was a blunder of epic proportions. A Cessna 152 student would have done far better. The captain got tunnel vision and got too far behind the aircraft, and could figure out what the problem was. The Check Airman/Instructor was the pilot in command bears full responsibility since the captain wasn't yet qualified. I'm a senior airline captain with 777 experience. I depend heavily on my First Officer to correct the most minor errors I might make. In return, I buy the beer (I've never flown a "perfect flight"). That's the way it is in the Western World of flying (and ships)
actually they are 2 different systems working under 1 command but good theory
Mana wrote a whole essay
@@drcroll he/she can't just say 'Plane crashed.' to explain her theory
Somewhat simple explanation: captain kuk selected level change mode on their FCU which make the auto throttle add thrust and the autopilot pitch up to climb to 3000 feet. Captain kuk didn't want to climb though, he wanted to continue the approach so he pulled back the thrust levers back to idle. That made the autothrottle thinks the pilot is controlling the thrust levers they go into HOLD mode which basically means the autothrottle isn't moving the throttle at all. This also disengage the autothrottle "wake up" feature on low speed
"ktvu has just learned the names of the 4 pilots who were on board the flight they are captain sum ting wong wi tu lot ho lee fuk and bang ding ow"
Asiana Airline 214 crashes
Smithsonian Channel: plays nice music and "it's brighter here"
The cameraman never dies💀😂😂
ironic how their motto is ‘it’s brighter here’ yet they literally cover air disaster stories
Mr Arbend looks like every pilot and police officer in a 70's TV show!
Rip to those 3 Who Died
Where there only 3 deaths? I hate it when they dont tell you :/
@@tuggspeedman822 , they weren’t wearing their seatbelts.
@@Powerranger-le4up I don’t agree with you. Attendants force passengers fasten safety’s belt where taking up and landing down.
@@Powerranger-le4up, 2 died on impact. 1 died after getting hit by a fire engine
@@CaptainJadenAR actually the 3rd one was killed By A Fire Truck
Well I certainly wouldn't fly in or out of San Francisco, too afraid to
These accidents are really rare. Plus all the investigations that went on and how they've corrected issues on the airport side you'd be fine flying in and out. Plus out of the 3 casualties 2 didn't wear seatbelts which flung them out of the plane. Meanwhile the cabin crew and other passengers who did wear seatbelts escaped with injuries
@@BrittenelleandOrionKMG okay in this case I feel reassured now and I feel better about it now having more faith and confidence in it. I think I’d be fine flying in and out of San Francisco.
To be entirely honest, I've flied in and out of San Francisco for maybe 7-10 times and each time it went pretty smoothly. However, there's always a chance of an incident occurring
@@chaerihwi5117 How often do incident's occur there?
@@JasonShipley1979 rarely. I've actually never heard of one except the 2013 one
No my pichur is asiana airlines RIP to the other pepple😢 at the back😭
Where is the rest of the video??
Read the description, the link is there to the Smithsonian website, viewable with a paid subscription.
It so very danger
Asiana airline 214 on DVD or for 3 Chinese girls for the movie in 2013.
Captain Sum ting Wong
Wi tu Lo
Ho Lee fuk
Bang ding ow
😂😂😂😂
Pro tip: do not fly with Sum Ting-Wong
Best airplane meme of the 2010’s
😭
Now he works at Air Canada and he almost caused a huge disaster at SFO about 5 years ago
@@mteagleworldno I think that was Wong Lan-Wei
@@KerbalHub with first officer Tai Xi-Wei
Another pro tip:-
Please verify your information before publishing it on the news.
Actually feel sorry to the poor newsreader reading out the fake names.
ok so what i heard that the plane was too low and when the pilots pulled up the throttle it was too late because it would take some time for the engines to go full speed and when the pilots throttled up they pulled up the yoke which lead to a stall i think so maybe it was pilot error
You are correct the investigación found that pilot error was the main cause of the Crash
Pilot names:
Captain sum ting wong
Wi tu lo
Ho lee fuk
Bang ding ow
I mean, isn't the basics of flying to land VFR? I am surprised the pilot forgot how to do VFR and allowed the computer to fly.
its said that the captain never really did a visual approach,.
Some companies require AP to land.
They're supposed to always check their airspeed, regardless. He overrode part of the computer when it tried to take them back up to 3000ft, but didn't know that doing so would disengage the auto-throttle. None of the pilots noticed.
Obviously that airport is dangerous....there should be no room for error in any aspect of flying.......then you looking for someone to blame .smh 😒
This is a type of plane crash Iam not scared of since everyone survived except for the three passenger without seatbelt’s so if Iam ever in a plane crash, I hope it’s similar to this or emirates flight 521 which was a pretty serious crash since there was a lot of fire yet everyone survived.
Finally I can see the look like of sum ting wong and his voice
I dont see anything here about copa 201
Well this accidente shoud not have happen
0:40 Thanks you for flying with Ryanair
The pilots were not able to fly stick and rudder. Their performance was way worse than the performance of a teenager during flying lessons in a Cessna.
Me living near SAN FRAN LIKE OH HELL NO
SAMEEE, I live in Berkeley but I land at SFO from a trip in a couple days 😭
To land in San Francisco airport you should check all around and pay attention to ATC
Asiana 214 Happened twice with United 232
Rip to the 3 people who die
Same
When I was coming back to CA I got scare cuz I look like the plane was going to land in the water btw the plane was a A321 or A320
no, it was a boeing 777, the really long planes that are referred to as "pencils with wings" look it up and you will see what i mean
oh wait lol i misread ur comment, sorry
Good af ternon greetings everyone
My man haha, NTSB old guy crashed several aircrafts in this channel as a pilot... Now got the job as investigator... Lol
on July 6th 2014 I was actually waiting for a flight at O-hare when I saw the news break, what are the odds
The most likely cause is that the pilots descended way too fast and realized that too late.
To all those people saying they’re scared of flying … did you see the Chinese passenger jet nose dive into the ground the other day?
Boeing 747 On Fire Explodes Mid-Air | Asiana Airlines Flight 991 | 4K
Meanwhile controller Wode-Fuk is watching this...
Glider pilots dont need it.......they just have skill...
The thumbnail looks like the plane is about to crash
Oh sh##
What was the name of the flight crew again?
Stall not enough flaps maybe? 😎👍
this happened on my birth date
🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
Low spd approach
Where can I watch the full episode?
Smithsonian channel
ik who died, only one flight attendant cuz the flight attendant was sitting at the back, and the back falled at the water, so the flight attendant died
Really? That's odd, because I checked that all the 3 dead people were passengers.
Pro Tip: dont approach manually, even if the guiding equipment is off
Pilots enjoy flying. In VMC, most pilots click the autopilot off and fly manually on final approach. Western World pilots have no problem with this most basic of flying skills. Most American and European pilots learned to fly in planes that required flying skills. The rest of the world leans mostly in simulators and become system managers instead of aviators (the exception is their military pilots, who generally stay in their relatively prestigious positions). If you can’t hand fly a plane to a runway that is in plain view in clear weather, you probably shouldn’t be flying an airliner full of passengers. Yes, use an autopilot when other problems demand your attention. But this was a perfectly good airplane in good weather. Nothing was wrong except that they had to use basic pilot judgement to determine their glide path. The real problem was that they didn’t change flight modes and stop the descent, which was the result of poor crew coordination. The Check Airman is to blame because he’s an expert on the plane and he’s likely seen this rookie mistake lots of times. The Captain/student reverted to his previous Airbus mentality, and the CKA should have caught this.
God is great
Allahu akbar
Not real 😂😂
Asiana flight 214 Was on final descend to San Francisco airport, The plane was about to land until the plane's nose went up and the engines started to roar, the planes back tail gets cut off the runway because of the impact of the back, The plane slides on the runway into the air and on the ground again, everyone survives.
Has anything like this have ever happened after this accident? Also how did they crash if the other planes landed safely with no errors at all?
Because you ar sopouse to use moré power on landing about 50% to 55% power
Enough Already with the animation! Your series used to be so good, until you started making videos for 12 year old's with ALL the kiddie animation.
What is wrong with the animation?
why stall asiana flight 214 accident runway 28L
The glideslope was under construction so they had to manually land the plane
Pilot Error
@@moygsa because there was sum ting wong
@@emiratesaviation33 lol